Inhibition of the COMPT with entacapone in the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson disease

Motor fluctuations are a common problem in the long-term treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Entacapone (Comtan) is a potent, peripherally acting, reversible and selective inhibitor of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT). Used as an adjuvant to levodopa therapy, entacapone slows the elimination of levodopa by decreasing peripheral conversion to 3-O-methyldopa, increasing central extracellular levodopa and striatal dopamine concentrations. Coadministered with levodopa/carbidopa or levodopa/benserazide, at doses of 200 mg 2 to 10 times daily in patients with end-of-dose fluctuations, entacapone may increase the duration of clinical response, both after the first single dose and after repeated dosing. At this dosage, it has a time to peak plasma concentration of 1.2 h and an elimination half life of 3.4 h. In two multicentric, long-term (24 weeks), parallel, randomized and placebo-controlled studies, entacapone increased the duration of 'on' time (by approximately 1 hour daily) and decreased the duration of 'off' time with a concomitant reduction in the mean daily levodopa dose. In these and other phase III studies, entacapone was generally well tolerated, with most adverse effects being dyskinesias and gastrointestinal disorders. Increased dyskinesia were generally controlled by reducing levodopa doses. Entacapone appears to be a useful adjunct in extending the benefit of each levodopa dose in PD patients with end-of-dose fluctuations.     

Entacapone increases levodopa exposure and reduces plasma levodopa variability when used with Sinemet CR

Entacapone is a catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor used as an adjunct to levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitors in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Entacapone increases the bioavailability and reduces the daily variation of plasma levodopa when administered with standard levodopa preparations. These parameters were studied when entacapone was administered with a controlled-release levodopa preparation after repeated administrations throughout the day in 16 healthy male volunteers. On 2 test days, 200 mg entacapone or placebo was administered 4 times during the day at 4-hour intervals concomitantly with a single dose of controlled-release levodopa/carbidopa 100 mg/25 mg (Sinemet CR). Plasma levodopa, 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD), and carbidopa concentrations were measured before intake of the medication and then every 30 minutes for 16 hours (until midnight), and less frequently up to 24 hours after the first levodopa dose. The minimum, maximum, and average concentration of levodopa; the daily variation of levodopa concentration; and the area under the time concentration curve (AUC) were calculated. The mean (+/-SD) plasma levodopa AUC was 39% (P = 0.0001) higher with entacapone (11,802 +/- 1454 ng/hour/mL) compared with placebo (8465 +/- 927 ng/hour/mL). The daily variation of plasma levodopa was reduced by about 25% with entacapone (P < 0.01). Entacapone significantly reduced plasma 3-OMD concentration by about 50% (P = 0.0001), indicating marked COMT inhibiting activity. There were no differences in plasma carbidopa concentrations. Entacapone significantly increased the bioavailability of levodopa and reduced its daily variation when administered concomitantly with a controlled-release levodopa preparation.     

Levodopa consumption reduces dopaminergic receptor responsiveness in Parkinson's disease

In seven patients with Parkinson's disease with daily motor fluctuations, we found that the same subcutaneous apomorphine dose that improved motor function when given in the morning after a normal night without taking levodopa failed to turn patients "on" during afternoon and evening "off" periods, and on a different morning after receiving levodopa during the night. No significant changes in levodopa or 3-O-methyldopa plasma levels that could explain these variations were detected. These findings suggest that increased daily levodopa consumption may reduce striatal responsiveness to dopaminergic stimulation.     

Long-term intraduodenal infusion of a water based levodopa-carbidopa dispersion in very advanced Parkinson's disease

Objective – To evaluate the effects of continuous duodenal infusion of levodopa over time on the disabling fluctuations in motor performance in advanced parkinsonian patients. It has earlier been demonstrated that these fluctuations can be reduced by keeping the plasma concentration of levodopa constant. Material and methods – In view of the low water solubility of levodopa a stable dispersion of the drug was developed and used for continuous intraduodenal infusion in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. Nine patients were evaluated with respect to an optimal oral treatment, during nasoduodenal infusion by a portable pump and then followed for 6 months to 2½ years when treated via transabdominal infusion. Upon each test occasion, over 2 non-consecutive days, objective movement analysis by means of an opto-electronic system was applied every 15-20 min and video recordings performed twice every h. On several test occasions plasma levodopa concentrations were analysed every 15 min. Results – The patients showed improvement and decreased variance of their motor function. In the 2 patients followed over a period of 2½ years levodopa plasma concentration showed reduced fluctuations on infusion and the levodopa consumption as well as mean levodopa plasma concentration decreased. Conclusion – Continuous duodenal infusion of levodopa is an alternative treatment strategy for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease when conventional therapy has failed.     

Influence of meal ingestion time on pharmacokinetics of orally administered levodopa in parkinsonian patients

The influence of meal ingestion time on rate and extent of oral levodopa absorption was evaluated in a group of 17 patients, after administration of their usual second daily dose of levodopa plus carbidopa (Sinemet 10:1) or benserazide (Madopar 4:1). Standard meals were consumed by the patients after they had fasted 15-17 h, on one occasion 30 min before ingestion of the levodopa "study dose" and, at another time, 2 h after ingestion of the same dose. This study dose, ranging from 50 to 250 mg levodopa, was given to the patients at 11 a.m., 4 h after their first morning dose. Time to peak plasma levodopa concentration increased threefold (from 45 +/- 23 to 134 +/- 76 min, p less than 0.001), when levodopa was administered after meals. Area under the 6-h plasma concentration-time curve for levodopa was decreased in 10 subjects, unchanged in three and higher in four after ingestion of meals, the latter finding probably resulting from an erratic absorption even at fasting. On the whole, levodopa absorption proved significantly lower (p less than 0.01), on the average 15%. Similarly, peak plasma levodopa concentrations were lower in 12 patients, unchanged in two, and higher in three, with an overall significant decrease (p less than 0.001) of 30% on the average. The data confirm the importance of meal ingestion time in relation to levodopa dose as a determinant of drug absorption.     

Pharmacokinetics of etilevodopa compared to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease: an open-label, randomized, crossover study

"Dose failures" and "delayed on" phenomena following an intake of levodopa dose in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with motor fluctuations may be caused by stagnation of poorly soluble levodopa in the atonic stomach. Etilevodopa is a unique, highly soluble prodrug of levodopa. When ingested, etilevodopa is more readily dissolved in the stomach than levodopa. It passes unchanged through the stomach to the duodenum, where it is rapidly hydrolyzed by local esterases and rapidly absorbed as levodopa. To compare the pharmacokinetics of three different modes of etilevodopa/carbidopa administration with standard levodopa/carbidopa tablets in fluctuating PD patients, 29 patients with PD and response fluctuations were enrolled in an open-label, randomized, four-way crossover study of single doses of 4 treatments: swallowed etilevodopa/carbidopa tablets, etilevodopa/carbidopa tablets dissolved in water, etilevodopa oral solution with carbidopa tablets, and standard levodopa/carbidopa tablets. To measure the maximal concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), and area under the curve (AUC) of plasma levodopa, etilevodopa, and carbidopa, blood samples were drawn before drug administration and at intervals up to 240 minutes thereafter. Plasma levodopa tmax was significantly shorter with all three modes of administration of etilevodopa (mean of about 30 minutes) than with levodopa treatment (mean of 54 minutes). During the first 45 minutes after drug ingestion, plasma levodopa AUC was significantly greater after etilevodopa administration than after levodopa administration. Levodopa AUC for 0 to 1 hour and 0 to 2 hours were also significantly greater following administration of etilevodopa/carbidopa swallowed tablets than following administration of levodopa/carbidopa tablets. Mean levodopa Cmax was in the range 2.3 to 2.7 microg/mL for all treatments. Levodopa Cmax was significantly greater following treatment with etilevodopa swallowed tablets than with levodopa tablets. Etilevodopa/carbidopa was well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable to that of levodopa/carbidopa. The shorter levodopa tmax observed with etilevodopa potentially translates to a shorter time to "on". Clinical trials with etilevodopa/carbidopa tablets should be carried out in PD patients with response fluctuations such as "delayed on" and "dose failures".     

Entacapone prolongs levodopa response in a one month double blind study in parkinsonian patients with levodopa related fluctuations.

OBJECTIVES--To establish, in a double blind manner, the antiparkinsonian effects of repeated dosing with entacapone, a peripheral COMT inhibitor. METHODS--A one month, cross over study was conducted. During the two four-week treatment periods, entacapone (200 mg) or placebo was given with each levodopa dose four to 10 times daily. Motor responses were repeatedly quantified using the motor part of UPDRS. Plasma levodopa and its metabolites were measured. RESULTS--Entacapone prolonged the availability of levodopa in the plasma and thus to the brain by decreasing its peripheral O-methylation and slowing its elimination rate, without affecting the maximum plasma levodopa concentration or the time to maximum concentration. Corresponding with the pharmacokinetic findings, entacapone prolonged the duration of motor response to an individual levodopa/DDC inhibitor dose by 34 minutes (24%, P = 0.001) and dyskinesiae by 39 minutes (37%, P = 0.002) compared with placebo, without affecting their magnitude or starting time. Entacapone treatment resulted in a reduction of 16% in the mean total daily levodopa dose due to dyskinesiae. Also, according to the home diaries, the mean daily "on" time increased by 2.1 hours compared with placebo, despite the lowered mean levodopa intake. CONCLUSION--The efficacy of repeated entacapone dosing as an adjuvant to levodopa/DDC inhibitor treatment for Parkinson's disease with levodopa related fluctuations is verified.     

Dopamine sulfate in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid and motor function in Parkinson's disease

We measured sequential plasma and CSF levodopa and CSF dopamine sulfate levels following a single dose of levodopa/carbidopa in two patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). We obtained CSF from an Ommaya reservoir implanted in the lateral ventricle several months earlier at the time of transplantation of adrenal medulla to caudate nucleus and could detect dopamine only in its sulfconjugated form. Peak CSF levodopa and dopamine sulfate levels occurred 1 to 1.5 hours after peak plasma concentration of levodopa. The time course of clinical improvement and worsening correlated precisely with the appearance and disappearance of both levodopa and dopamine sulfate in the CSF. The precise correlation between CSF dopamine sulfate and levodopa indicates that in patients with advanced PD the brain retains some capacity to convert levodopa to dopamine. The transient nature of the correlation between motor fluctuations, CSF levodopa, and CSF dopamine sulfate is consistent with suggestions that in patients with advanced PD there is a diminished capacity to store dopamine synthesized from exogenous levodopa. Dopamine sulfate appears to be a useful index of the availability of dopamine in the parkinsonian brain.     

Acute effects of pulsatile levodopa administration on central dopamine pharmacodynamics

Inconsistencies in the response to individual levodopa doses occur in most patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). To investigate the possible development of acute tachyphylaxis, we evaluated the effects of repeated injections of intravenous levodopa in 10 PD patients with motor fluctuations by administering, during a single day, a previously determined optimal levodopa dose repeatedly each time motor function returned to baseline. Peak antiparkinsonian response was lower by 20%, and peak plasma levodopa levels lower by 35% following the first dose compared with all subsequent doses. Neither peak dyskinesia scores nor the duration of motor response changed significantly with successive levodopa doses. These data suggest that pulsatile levodopa administration does not acutely alter dopamine receptor responsiveness, and that other pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors contribute to the dose-to-dose variability in response to levodopa.     

Crossover comparison of IPX066 and a standard levodopa formulation in advanced Parkinson's disease

The objective of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetics, motor effects, and safety of IPX066, a novel extended‐release formulation of carbidopa‐levodopa, with an immediate‐release carbidopa‐levodopa formulation in advanced Parkinson's disease. We performed an open‐label crossover study in 27 subjects with advanced Parkinson's disease experiencing motor fluctuations on levodopa therapy. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to 8 days' treatment with either immediate‐release carbidopa‐levodopa followed by IPX066 or IPX066 followed by immediate‐release carbidopa‐levodopa. Pharmacokinetic and motor assessments were undertaken on day 1 for 8 hours (following a single dose) and on day 8 for 12 hours (during multiple‐dose administration). Following a single dose of IPX066 or immediate‐release carbidopa‐levodopa, plasma levodopa concentrations increased at a similarly rapid rate and were sustained above 50% of peak concentration for 4 hours with IPX066 versus 1.4 hours with immediate‐release carbidopa‐levodopa (P < .0001). Multiple‐dose data showed IPX066 substantially reduced variability in plasma levodopa concentrations despite a lower dosing frequency (mean, 3.5 vs 5.4 administrations per day). In addition, total levodopa exposure during IPX066 treatment was approximately 87% higher, whereas the increase in levodopa C_max was approximately 30% compared with immediate‐release carbidopa‐levodopa. Both products were well tolerated. IPX066 provided more sustained plasma levodopa concentrations than immediate‐release carbidopa‐levodopa. Larger, longer‐term, well‐controlled studies should be conducted to provide rigorous assessment of the clinical effects of IPX066. © 2011 Movement Disorder Society     

Comparison of levodopa with carbidopa, and levodopa with domperidone in Parkinson's disease

In a comparison of the effects of domperidone and carbidopa during levodopa treatment, 20 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease were treated with fixed dose regimens of either levodopa 500 mg-domperidone 20 mg or levodopa 100 mg-carbidopa 25 mg; each for 8 weeks. Clinical response, incidence of side effects, and plasma levodopa concentration resulting from each treatment were compared. Overall, in the dosages used, Parkinson's disease was less well controlled with levodopa-domperidone than with levodopa-carbidopa. In eight subjects there was a severe deterioration 2 to 7 days after changing from a fixed dose of levodopa-carbidopa to levodopa-domperidone. In nine subjects who completed the trial, the clinical response, occurrence of dyskinesias and of nausea and vomiting, were similar with both treatments, although peak plasma levodopa concentration and levodopa bioavailability were greater on levodopa-domperidone than on levodopa-carbidopa.     

Influence of fluctuations of plasma large neutral amino acids with normal diets on the clinical response to levodopa.

Plasma large neutral amino acids (LNAAs) compete with levodopa for entry into the brain. Fluctuations in plasma LNAA concentrations could therefore contribute to variability in clinical response to levodopa. The hourly plasma levodopa, plasma LNAAs and clinical response were investigated in 11 fluctuating Parkinsonian patients on a regular hospital diet. The fluctuations in plasma levodopa were 2 to 3 times greater than the fluctuations of plasma LNAAs. The correlation between clinical response and plasma levodopa was substantially improved in only one patient by considering plasma LNAAs and calculating relative levodopa flux into brain. Although plasma LNAAs significantly increased during the day, the patients' clinical status did not uniformly deteriorate and mean afternoon clinical scores correlated better with mean plasma levodopa and levodopa flux than with mean plasma LNAAs. Minimum effective concentrations of levodopa for clinical response did not correlate with 9 am LNAA concentrations. It is concluded that in most patients, the relatively small variation in plasma LNAAs in comparison with the large variations in plasma levodopa indicates that fluctuations in LNAA are not an important contributor to the fluctuating response to levodopa.     

Effect of a slow release preparation of levodopa on Parkinson''s disease in combination with a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor

Plasma concentrations of levodopa were determined after therapeutic oral levodopa-carbidopa doses. The wide fluctuations observed in plasma levodopa levels could be considerably reduced by the addition of a slow release levodopa preparation. This kind of combination medication was given to 15 parkinsonian patients, whose earlier therapy had proved inadequate. With the combination medication, levodopa-carbidopa, on an average 420 mg/42 mg combined with 950 mg of levodopa in slow release form, a statistically significant improvement in parkinsonian signs could be achieved without any worsening of the side effects. The results suggest that parkinsonian patients may tolerate much higher daily levodopa doses if the fluctuations in plasma levels of the drug can be diminished.     

The effect of exercise on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levodopa.

The aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of low-intensity exercise on levodopa absorption and levodopa motor effect. We studied the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levodopa under resting conditions and under a workload of 50 watts for 2 hours on a cycle ergometer in 12 parkinsonian patients with predictable fluctuations of motor disability. The patients attended the hospital on both days in a provoked off state. After a baseline assessment of motor disability using the Columbia University rating scale (CURS scale) and a blood test for measurement of the baseline levodopa concentration in the plasma, 100 mg levodopa and 25 mg benserazide were administered as a single dose orally. Blood samples for measurement of the levodopa concentration in the plasma were taken, and motor assessments were conducted at 15-minute intervals for 240 minutes and at 30-minute intervals from 240 to 360 minutes. All patients were able to perform the exercise program. The baseline Columbia University rating scale score did not differ significantly between both days. The mean levodopa concentration in plasma at half-maximal motor effect tended to be higher during exercise and indicated that the patients needed a higher levodopa concentration in plasma to achieve the half-maximal motor effect. The maximal levodopa concentration in plasma tended to be higher with exercise. Both trends did not reach statistical significance. In summary, there was not a negative or a positive net effect of exercise on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levodopa. However, there were two counteracting trends: a trend toward better levodopa absorption and a trend toward a deteriorated concentration-effect correlation.     

Influence of protein-restricted diet on motor response fluctuations in Parkinson's disease]

The clinical management of Parkinson's disease has been revolutionized by the introduction of levodopa therapy. It has significantly reduced disability and has extended life expectancies of patients with Parkinson's disease. However, motor response fluctuations frequently appear in patients after long-term treatment with levodopa. In this study, we investigated the effect of protein-restricted diet on fluctuations in eight patients with Parkinson's disease who had been receiving long-term levodopa treatment (mean 12.5 years). Two weeks of protein-restricted daytime diet (7.5 g total at breakfast and lunch) was followed by 12.5 g total at breakfast and lunch. At night, high-protein diet (40-50 g at dinner) was offered to the patients in order to maintain total daily protein intake at Japanese standard level. The medication schedule of levodopa and other antiparkinsonian drugs was not changed within 2 weeks after the study was began. Fluctuations were reduced in 7 of the 8 patients. But in only one patient (case 6), dyskinesia and general condition got worse and stopped this therapy. Body weight, serum protein and albumin levels did not change significantly for at least three month after the study was begun in every 6 patients who were examined. Homovanillic acid level of cerebrospinal fluid reduced in every 4 patients who were examined. We concluded that protein-restricted diet during the daytime offers a fascinating technique for the control of motor response fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing long-term levodopa treatment. But this therapy must be indicated carefully. Mechanism of this therapy may has something to do with improvement of dopamine metabolism in the brain.     

COMT inhibition in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease

A new approach in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease is the inhibition of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) with new generation COMT inhibitors, entacapone and tolcapone. Entacapone acts mainly peripherally whereas tolcapone acts both peripherally and centrally. They induce a dose-dependent inhibition of COMT activity in erythrocytes and a significant decrease in the plasma levels of 3-O-methyldopa, indicating their effectiveness as COMT inhibitors. Consequently, they increase the elimination half-life of levodopa and thus prolong the availability of levodopa to the brain without significantly affecting the C_max or t_max of levodopa. Clinically, the improved levodopa availability is seen as prolonged motor response to levodopa/DDC inhibitor and also as prolonged duration of dyskinesias in Parkinson’s disease patients with end-of-dose fluctuations. The dyskinesias are managed by decreasing the daily levodopa dose in Parkinson’s disease patients with end-of-dose fluctuations. Both pharmacokinetically and clinically the 200-mg dose of entacapone is the most effective dose compared with placebo. For tolcapone 100 and 200 mg have most often proved to be the optimal doses. Based on the duration of COMT inhibition entacapone is administered with each levodopa/DDC inhibitor dose whereas tolcapone is given three times daily. Both entacapone and tolcapone are well-tolerated. However, there seems to be a trend for tolcapone to induce more often diarrhoea and increase in liver transaminases compared with entacapone. Thus, COMT inhibitors are clinically significant and beneficial adjunct to levodopa therapy in Parkinson’s disease patients with end-of-dose fluctuations. Their effects and significance also in the treatment of de novo patients need to be clarified.

     

Extended levodopa release from a subcutaneously implanted polymer matrix in rats

It is well recognized that plasma fluctuations resulting from oral levodopa therapy may cause an unstable clinical response in parkinsonian patients. We have therefore developed a slow-release polymer matrix system that can deliver levodopa continuously for extended periods of time (at least 225 days) after subcutaneous implantation in rats. Advantages of this approach include (1) the elimination of levodopa plasma fluctuations and (2) the possibility of reducing the required dose due to constant plasma levels and because the gastrointestinal tract is circumvented. The peripheral implantation of polymer systems containing levodopa, dopamine receptor agonists, or other anti-Parkinson agents may constitute a novel technology of drug delivery to improve the care of patients with Parkinson's disease.     

Levodopa/DDCI and entacapone is the preferred treatment for Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations in routine practice: a retrospective, observational analysis of a large French cohort

Levodopa is the gold standard drug for the symptomatic control of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, long-term treatment with conventional formulations [levodopa and a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI)], is associated with re-emergence of symptoms because of wearing-off and dyskinesia. Treatment with levodopa/DDCI and entacapone extends the half-life of levodopa, avoiding deep troughs in levodopa plasma levels and providing more continuous delivery of levodopa to the brain. In this open-label, retrospective, observational study we investigated the effects of levodopa/DDCI and entacapone therapy in 800 PD patients with motor fluctuations. Levodopa/DDCI and entacapone treatment was assessed as good/very good in improving motor fluctuations (64%) and activities of daily living (ADL; 62%). The therapeutic utility was considered to be good/very good in 70% of cases. Moreover, there was a reduction in levodopa dose in 20% of patients. Neurologists preferred levodopa/DDCI and entacapone compared with increasing levodopa dosage, dose-fractionation or addition of a dopamine agonist (63%, 29% and 23% of patients respectively). Reasons included achieving more continuous dopaminergic stimulation (40%), reducing motor fluctuations (54%) and improving ADL (41%). This analysis reveals the preference of neurologists for levodopa/DDCI and entacapone over conventional levodopa-modification strategies for the effective treatment of PD motor fluctuations in clinical practice.     

Levodopa infusion combined with entacapone or tolcapone in Parkinson disease: a pilot trial

Background and purpose: Catechol‐O‐methyltransferase inhibitors may be used to decrease levodopa requirement. The objective was to investigate whether the levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel infusion dose can be reduced by 20% without worsening of motor fluctuations and levodopa concentration stability when oral catechol‐O‐methyltransferase inhibitors are added. Methods: A short‐term, randomized, partly blinded, crossover, investigator‐initiated clinical trial was performed, with levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel combined with oral entacapone and tolcapone on two different days in 10 patients. The primary outcome measure was difference in coefficient of variation of levodopa in plasma between levodopa/carbidopa, levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone, and levodopa/carbidopa/tolcapone. The secondary outcome measures other pharmacokinetic variables, patient‐reported outcome, and blinded analysis of motor performance. Results: Variation of plasma levodopa concentrations did not differ significantly between the treatments. The treatments did not differ regarding motor performance. Levodopa concentrations were significantly higher using tolcapone. Concentrations of the metabolite 3‐O‐methyldopa decreased gradually during catechol‐O‐methyltransferase inhibition. Conclusions: According to this small, short‐term pilot study, oral catechol‐O‐methyltransferase inhibitors administered in 5‐h intervals may be useful in cases where levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel dose reduction is wanted. Stability of plasma levodopa levels is not significantly altered, and off‐time is not increased when decreasing the levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel dose by 20%. Rather, the dose should probably be decreased more than 20%, especially under tolcapone co‐treatment, to avoid increased dyskinesias with time.     

Genetic polymorphism of catechol-O-methyltransferase and levodopa pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic pattern in patients with Parkinson's disease.

We explored the potential effect of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) genetic polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a standard oral dose of levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We prospectively collected blood samples for COMT genotyping from a population of 104 PD patients. Each patient was examined by a standard oral levodopa/benserazide test, based on simultaneous serial measurements of plasma levodopa concentrations, finger-tapping motor effects and dyskinesia ratings, up to 4 hours after dosing. The main levodopa pharmacokinetic outcome variables were time to peak and peak plasma concentration, plasma elimination half-life, and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve. The main outcome levodopa pharmacodynamic variables were latency, duration, and magnitude of the motor effect elicited by the levodopa test dose, the area under the tapping effect-time curve, and the presence of dyskinesias. Nineteen patients (18%) harbored the low-activity homozygous COMT genotype (A/A), 63 patients (61%) carried the intermediate-activity heterozygous COMT genotype (A/G) and 22 patients (21%) had the high-activity homozygous COMT genotype (G/G). The three groups were comparable for vital and clinical characteristics. No significant difference was found in levodopa main pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic variables and dyskinesia incidence among the three subgroups of patients. We failed to identify clinically relevant levodopa pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic response patterns associated with the COMT polymorphism in PD patients.