Optimal routes of administration of ergotamine tartrate in cluster headache patients. A pharmacokinetic study

Bioavailability and rate of absorption of ergotamine were studied in eight cluster headache patients outside attacks. In a cross-over design, approximately 2 mg ergotamine tartrate was administered as effervescent tablets, suppositories, and from an inhalation device, with 0.25 mg intravenously as the reference. Ergotamine in plasma was measured by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection from 5 to 420 min. For all three routes of administration, a similar low (0.5-4.2%) bioavailability of ergotamine was estimated. Only inhalation of ergotamine resulted in early (at 5 min) peak concentrations of ergotamine in plasma and is therefore most likely to relieve the short-lived attacks of cluster headache. The inhalation route for ergotamine poses problems, however, and we suggest ways of improving the inhalation device.     

Comparison of pharmacodynamic effects and plasma levels of oral and rectal ergotamine

Plasma levels and the vasoconstrictive effect of 1 mg ergotamine tartrate given as tablets or suppositories were compared. In a crossover study, eight male volunteers received tablets or suppositories containing ergotamine in a drug combination (Anervan) and, as a control, suppositories without ergotamine. Blood sampling and measurement of toe-arm systolic gradients with a strain-gauge technique were done for up to 6 h and again after 24 h and 48 h. Only 29 of 160 blood samples contained detectable (greater than 0.1 ng/ml) amounts of ergotamine, and kinetic comparison could not be performed. Only ergotamine-containing suppositories caused a significant (p less than 0.008) decrease in toe-arm systolic gradient which was significantly different (p less than 0.003) from the effects of ergotamine tablets and control suppositories. Rectal ergotamine is thus more biologically active, for the factor used, than oral ergotamine. We suggest that a rectal dose of 1 mg ergotamine tartrate should be tried as the initial dose in the treatment of migraine attacks.     

Acute migraine attack therapy: comparison of naproxen sodium and an ergotamine tartrate compound

The efficacy of safety of naproxen sodium and ergotamine tartrate were compared for the treatment of acute migraine attack in a randomized, parallel trial with 114 participating patients. At the start of symptoms, patients took either three tablets of naproxen sodium (275 mg each) or one of an ergotamine combination (containing 2 mg ergotamine tartrate, 91.5 mg caffeine, and 50 mg cyclizine chlorhydrate). Patients were followed for three months or until six attacks were monitored, whichever came first. Both medications substantially shortened the duration of migraine attacks and reduced the severity of symptoms. When the test medications were taken within 2 h of onset of attack, naproxen sodium was statistically significantly more effective than the ergotamine combination in reducing the severity of headache pain, nausea, and lightheadedness. The ergotamine combination was associated with significantly more vomiting, need for rescue medication, and side effects than was naproxen sodium. Four patients required discontinuation of the ergotamine combination and one of naproxen sodium. Both patients and investigators rated tolerance for naproxen sodium as superior to tolerance for the ergotamine combination. Naproxen sodium seems to be an effective and safe treatment for migraine attacks.     

Low biological availability of ergotamine tartrate after oral dosing in cluster headache

An attempt was made to determine the plasma ergotamine concentrations in nine male patients with cluster headache 15-600 min after oral therapeutic doses of ergotamine tartrate (Cafergot). Some of the patients were studied twice. Five patients received a constant dose of 2-4 mg daily for at least seven days. Four patients were given 1 mg five times on one day and three patients a single oral dose of 2 mg. Ergotamine was determined by means of high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection--a new highly sensitive, specific method, the detection limit of which is less than 100 pg/ml for ergotamine. Ergotamine tartrate was not discovered in any of the plasma samples. In one patient ergotamine could not be detected in the cerebrospinal fluid one hour after a single oral dose of 2 mg. The oral biological availability is less than 1%, which is the maximal available fraction of unchanged ergotamine after oral administration. A clinical benefit was observed in several of our patients. These effects of the drug may be because of active metabolites being formed and/or to high affinity of ergotamine to cranial vessels.     

Treatment of the acute migraine attack current status

The main treatment of the acute migraine attack remains sleep, sedation, an anti-nauseant and analgesics, and in some patients 1 or 2 mg of ergotamine tartrate. Drugs containing large amounts of caffeine should not be used. Absorption of drugs may be impaired in a migraine attack. Metoclopramide is probably the anti-emetic of choice because it is an effective anti-nauseant and promotes normal gastrointestinal activity. Domperidone has a similar action but is said not to go through the blood-brain barrier, so is less likely to cause extrapyramidal reactions. All drugs, including analgesics such as aspirin and paracetamol, are best given in a soluble or effervescent form. Where vomiting occurs early in the attack, suppositories may be indicated. Ergotamine tartrate is necessary in about one third of attacks and is best given by suppository or by inhalation. Doses higher than 2 mg per attack or 6 mg in one week may cause toxic symptoms, the early signs of which are headache, nausea, vomiting and a feeling of not being very well. The non-drug treatments of an acute attack include pressing on the temporal artery, hot and cold compresses and relaxation.     

Ergotamine vs. metoclopramide vs. their combination in acute migraine attacks

The effect of ergotamine tartrate was compared with that of the antiemetic agent metoclopramide and with those of two combinations in a double-blind trial of 24 adult female patients with migraine. The following combinations of the drugs were used in oral administration in a total of 176 acute migraine attacks: (a) Ergotamine 1 mg, (b) Metoclopramide 20 mg, (c) Ergotamine 1 mg + metoclopramide 20 mg, (d) Ergotamine 2 mg + metoclopramide 20 mg. The duration of attacks was significantly shorter on both of the combinations compared with the single drugs. The intensity of the pain was somewhat weaker and the appearance of nausea and vomiting somewhat but not significantly less during the combination treatments. In their overall opinion the patients favored the 2 mg + 20 mg combination significantly more than the others. Both ergotamine and metoclopramide are efficient in acute migraine attacks. Their combination seems to enhance the therapeutic response in some respects.     

Ergotamine abuse: Results of ergotamine discontinuation, with special reference to the plasma concentrations

Twenty-three patients suffering from continuous headache linked with habitual daily use of ergotamine tartrate were studied. Their headaches were classified clinically, and possible side effects of ergotamine medication, plasma levels of ergotamine, and occurrence of withdrawal symptoms after discontinuation of drug abuse were recorded. Seventeen of the patients were clinically diagnosed as suffering from "ergotamine headache", and seven of them complained of coldness in the extremities. Plasma ergotamine levels were measured by using a radioimmunoassay. In almost half of the patients the 1 h plasma levels after the daily dose were below the detection limit of the procedure (0.12 ng/ml). The duration and severity of the withdrawal symptoms did not correlate with the doses and plasma levels of ergotamine. In only 4 of the 21 patients who were followed up for 3 to 6 months did headache symptoms not improve after ergotamine withdrawal. The results indicate that even small (0.5–1.0 mg/day) doses of ergotamine tartrate taken regularly may cause continuous headache symptoms and withdrawal symptoms after discontinuation.     

Sublingual Flunarizine: a New Effective Management of the Migraine Attack. A Comparison versus Ergotamine

SYNOPSIS
Flunarizine was found to be effective in the acute treatment of isosorbide dinitrate induced migraine attacks, when given in a dosage of 10 mg sublingually.
The present study consists of two parts: in the first preliminary investigation, 7 out of 8 migraine patients who developed a typical migraine attack after isosorbide dinitrate were relieved of pain within about 10 minutes. On the basis of this result a second, randomized controlled open trial was performed, in which the acute efficacy of flunarizine was compared with ergotamine tartrate, 0.25 mg i.m., on 40 migraine patients. Flunarizine was found as effective as ergotamine (75% positive responses in the flunarizine group, 70% in the ergotamine group). The mean latency of the flunarizine effect was significantly lower than that of the ergotamine ( r < 0.001, Student's t test). Moreover sublingual flunarizine was found to be virtually devoid of side effects.     

Ergotamine in plasma and CSF after i.m. and rectal administration to humans

An attempt was made to study the kinetics of penetration of ergotamine across the blood-bran barrier. A single therapeutic dose of ergotamine was given to 18 hospitalized patients; eight patients received 0.5 mg i.m., three patients 4 mg rectally, and seven patients 2 mg rectally. Plasma samples were drawn between 0.25 and 72 h and one CSF sample was taken from each patient between 0.5 and 6.5 h after administration. The ergotamine concentrations were measured using a RIA method. The 0.5 mg intramuscular injection showed the highest plasma levels of ergotamine, with a mean peak concentration of 1.27 ng/ml reached at 0.5 h. The 4 mg rectal administration resulted in mean plasma ergotamine levels of 0.44 ng/ml in the time interval of 0.75–2 h. The 2 mg ergotamine rectally resulted in mean plasma levels of 0.15–0.17 ng/ml 1–8 h after administration of ergotamine. Neither the plasma samples taken after 10 h nor the CSF samples had ergotamine concentrations above the detection limit of the RIA method (0.1 ng ergotamine/ml).     

Impact of antimigraine compounds on cognitive processing: a placebo-controlled crossover study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate potential cognitive impairment caused by acute antimigraine drugs. METHODS: We conducted a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study to detect the short-term impact of sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, and ergotamine tartrate on cognitive processing as measured by event-related potentials and a d2 test. Sixteen healthy subjects were enrolled in the study and given placebo, sumatriptan 100 mg, zolmitriptan 2.5 mg, and ergotamine tartrate 2 mg on different days and in random order. Before and 2 hours after drug administration, visually evoked event-related potentials and a d2 test were measured. RESULTS: The N2 latency was significantly increased after ergotamine intake. No other significant differences could be observed in all other event-related potential parameters. In the d2 test, the GZ value was unchanged after ingestion of zolmitriptan and ergotamine, but improved significantly after taking placebo and sumatriptan. The number of relative errors and the concentration value did not change significantly. All results fell within the reference values for the d2 test in all examinations. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that there may be a slight cognitive decline 2 hours after ingestion of ergotamine tartrate and, to an even lesser extent, zolmitriptan, but not after ingestion of sumatriptan or placebo. All changes recorded were very mild and unlikely to be clinically relevant.     

Reduced serotonin vascular sensitivity in ergotamine abusers

The action of ergotamine on the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) venous sensitivity was studied in ergotamine abuser and non-abuser migraine patients. Ergotamine abusers showed reduced 5-HT hand vein contraction during abuse, compared to seven days after ergotamine withdrawal. In non-ergotamine users, the 5-HT venoconstriction was not significantly modified 12 h after a single intramuscular ergotamine (0.25 mg) administration. Even the administration of ergotamine locally into the vein did not change the venospasm of 5-HT given acutely in the same vein. Therefore, it seems that the 5-HT antagonism does not contribute to the therapeutic effect of ergotamine during the migraine attack. Moreover, the reduced 5-HT responsiveness during ergotamine abuse may possibly be compatible with the chronic headache present in some abusers, the withdrawal headache attacks and the abuse itself.     

Ergotamine Dependency- a Review

SYNOPSIS
Ergotamine tartrate has been recognized as the drug of first choice for the treatment of acute attacks of migraine. This paper draws attention to a common but poorly delineated state of addiction that can develop when ergotamine tartrate usage exceeds two or three days per week. This syndrome is characterized by a self-sustaining, rhythmic headache/medication cycle, with daily or almost daily migraine headaches and the irresistible and predictable use of ergotamine tartrate as the only means of alleviating the headache attacks. This report further delineates the clinical features, criteria for recognition, and treatment alternatives for this syndrome. In order to avoid this condition, usage should be restricted to 2 days per week.     

HUMAN PLASMA LEVELS OF SOME ANTI-MIGRAINE DRUGS

SYNOPSIS
Four compounds of therapeutic value in the treatment of migraine attacks or for the prophylaxis of migraine and other vascular headaches, ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, methysergide and pizotifen are given in low dosages and achieve low in vivo concentration. Human plasma levels were determined by measurement of radioactivity after oral administration of the corresponding radioactively labeled compounds. The labeling of the four compounds with tritium or carbon-14 is briefly described. The procedure to measure radioactivity of the blood samples is given. The values from single dose experiments in healthy volunteers were analysed based on a compartment model which allows for the formation of metabolites. The calculated pharmacokinetic constants have been used for simulations and predictions of plasma levels after different therapeutic dosages.     

Medical therapy for menstrual migraine

A menstrual migraine occurs in approximately 7-10 % of women suffering from migraine. The migraine occurs from 2 days before until 3 days after the end of the menstrual period. The choice of treatment depends on the duration of the attack, which ranges from 3 to 7 days. An attack of up to 3 days duration should be treated with acetylsalicylic acid, ergotamine tartrate or naproxen, each in combination with an antiemetic (domperidone, metoclopramide). If there is no response, sumatriptan can be administered orally (25-100 mg) or subcutaneously (6 mg). In the attacks continue for more than 3 days, short-term prophylaxis with naproxen or the application of an estrogen-containing patch is indicated. Neither ovulation inhibitors nor traditional migraine prophylaxis has an influence on menstrual migraine. Patients should keep a headache diary. Short-term prophylaxis with ergotamine tartrate or tamoxifen is obsolete.     

Intramuscular ergotamine: plasma levels and dynamic activity

Ergotamine tartrate (0.5 mg) was injected intramuscularly into 10 subjects with migraine. The effect on peripheral arteries, measured as a decrease in toe-arm systolic gradients, developed slowly and was well sustained after 29 hr. In contrast, ergotamine was quickly absorbed (t1/2 = 3 min) and plasma levels (measured by HPLC) declined, with a biologic t1/2 of 2.5 hr. A hypothetic effect compartment model was adopted and kinetic and dynamic data were simultaneously fitted on a computer. Calculated from mean data, the rate constant for equilibration of the drug between plasma and effector site was 0.07 hr-1, with a t1/2 of 9.9 hr, and the steady-state plasma concentration resulting in 50% of maximal effect (Cpss50) was 0.24 ng/ml. The largest variability for the estimated kinetic and dynamic parameters among subjects was found for Cpss50 (coefficient of variation = 110%), indicating that, in addition to some kinetic variability, dynamic variability (difference in sensitivity) should be anticipated in the therapeutic use of ergotamine.     

Aborting a Migraine Attack: Naproxen Sodium v Ergotamine plus Caffeine

SYNOPSIS
The tolerability and efficacy of naproxen sodium and of ergotamine tartrate plus caffeine (ergotamine) were compared in the treatment of acute migraine attacks and associated symptoms. In this multicenter, double-blind, parallel study of up to six headaches over a 3-month period, patients took naproxen sodium 825 mg, ergotamine 2 mg, or placebo at the time of the first symptom of an attack; 30 minutes later, if necessary, patients repeated naproxen sodium 275 mg, ergotamine 1 mg or placebo, as appropriate. Rescue medication was allowed 30 minutes following the second dose if needed. Active drugs provided notably better relief of head pain than did placebo; 1 hour following the first dose the difference between naproxen sodium and placebo was statistically significant. Naproxen sodium was as efficacious as ergotamine in the relief of migraine attacks and associated symptoms. Relief of vomiting, nausea, photophobia, and motor symptoms favored naproxen sodium over ergotamine; these differences were statistically significant for nausea and motor symptoms. Ergotamine-treated patients reported more complaints and had more severe and longer-lasting complaints than patients on the other two regimens. Overall tolerance ratings by both investigators and patients indicated that naproxen sodium and placebo were tolerated significantly better than ergotamine.     

Triptans vs Other Drugs for Acute Migraine. Are There Differences in Efficacy? A Comment

The introduction of triptans in migraine treatment was apparently a revolution. Comparative randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with triptan and other drugs do not give a clear-cut picture. Oral triptans are superior to oral ergotamine most likely because the bioavailability oral of ergotamine is extremely low (<1%). Compared with NSAIDs, in most cases aspirin, triptans were not superior and in several RCTs triptans caused more adverse events than aspirin plus metoclopramide. Guidelines for treatment of migraine should be evidence-based. It is suggested that based on current evidence, effervescent aspirin should be the first-line drug for the treatment of migraine. Aspirin is also much cheaper than the triptans.     

Neurogenically mediated plasma extravasation in dura mater: Effect of ergot alkaloids

C-fiber-dependent neurogenic plasma extravasation developed in the dura mater but not the brain after electric stimulation of the rat trigeminal ganglion or after chemical stimulation of perivascular axons with intravenous capsaicin, a drug that depolarizes sensory nerve fibers. C-fiber-independent extravasation also developed in this tissue after intravenous injections of substance P or neurokinin A (two constituents of unmyelinated C fibers) and after serotonin, bradykinin, or allergic challenge in presensitized animals. Intravenous dihydroergotamine or ergotamine tartrate, in doses similar to those used to treat migraine and cluster headache, prevented the stimulation-induced leakage of plasma proteins within the dura mater. Not unexpectedly, the acute administration of methysergide, a drug effective in the prophylactic treatment of headache, was inactive in this acute model. Neither acute nor chronic administration of propranolol affected stimulation-induced leakage of plasma protein. These results demonstrate that neurogenic inflammation develops within the dura mater in the rat and that ergot alkaloids prevent the process by a C-fiber-dependent mechanism.     

What Happens to the Old Headache Medicines?

Old headache medicines never die; they either fade away or come back in disguise. The disguise is often a new route of administration, which may work better, faster, more completely, with fewer adverse events, and/or have certain other advantages. The clinical aspects of 3 of the oldest headache medicines (ergotamine tartrate, dihydroergotamine, and methysergide) will be discussed here. Sumatriptan will then be discussed as the prototype of the newest category of acute care therapy (triptans) for migraine. It will be compared with the older medications, and the new forms being developed will be briefly discussed. Diclofenac potassium for oral solution will be mentioned as the newest drug approved for migraine by the Food and Drug Administration, and a possible alternative to triptans in patients with frequent headaches or those with contraindications to vasoconstrictors.