Antichemokine immunotherapy for allergic diseases

Chemokines have emerged as critical regulators of leukocyte function and as such represent attractive new targets for the therapy of allergic diseases. Recent studies have revealed important roles for the chemokine family in both the afferent and efferent limbs of the immune system, orchestrating and integrating innate and acquired immune responses. A subset of chemokines including eotaxin-1 (also called CCL11), eotaxin-2 (CCL24), eotaxin-3 (CCL26), MCP (monocyte chemoattractant protein)-3 (CCL7), MCP (monocyte chemoattractant protein)-4 (CCL13), TARC (thymus- and activation-regulated chemokine) (CCL17), and MDC (macrophage-derived chemokine) (CCL22) are highly expressed in allergic inflammation and are regulated by T helper type 2 cytokines. Receptors for these chemokines, including CCR3 (CC chemokine receptor 3), CCR4 (CC chemokine receptor 4) and CCR8 (CC chemokine receptor 8) are expressed on key leukocytes associated with allergic inflammation, such as T helper type 2 cells, eosinophils, mast cells and basophils, establishing a subset of chemokine/chemokine receptors potentially important in allergic inflammation. Recent data using inhibitory antibodies and chemokine antagonists support the concept that interfering with this subset of chemokines and their receptors represents a new approach to allergy immunotherapy.     

Chemoattractant receptors expressed on type 2 T cells and their role in disease

The existence of two functionally distinguished populations among T cells has been established in both mice and humans. Type 1 T helper (Th1) cells are involved in the defense against intracellular bacteria and many viruses, while type 2 Th cells (Th2) are the major actors in the response against parasites and play a central role in allergic inflammation. More recently, several data have suggested that some chemokine receptors are tightly regulated on T cells, and in accordance with this selective expression, Th1 and Th2 cells can be differentially recruited by specific chemokines to the inflammatory sites. Among Th2-associated chemokine receptors, CCR3, CCR4 and CCR8 have been described to play a central role in allergic inflammation. However, CCR3 is mainly expressed on basophils, eosinophils and mast cells, but it is poorly expressed by Th2 cells, and CCR4 is also expressed by Th subsets different from Th2 cells. So far, the chemoattractant receptors which among T cells appear to be selectively expressed by Th2 cells or their subsets are CCR8 and CRTH2. The ligand for CRTH2 is not a chemokine, but is prostaglandin (PG)D2, which is able to attract basophils, eosinophils, Th2 cells and type 2 cytotoxic (Tc2) CD8+ T lymphocytes. The selective expression of CRTH2 on Th2 and Tc2 cells may be useful to develop new therapeutic strategies against allergic diseases and against other immune disorders. Additional studies, however, are required to understand its effective importance in the induction and maintenance of Th2- or Tc2-mediated response and inflammation.     

Chemokine receptor antagonists: a novel therapeutic approach in allergic diseases

The aim of this review is to give an overview of the role of chemokines, particularly ligands of the CC chemokine receptor CCR3, in allergic diseases and to show the new concept in the treatment of allergies using chemokine receptor antagonists. Allergic diseases such as allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis are characterized by a complex interaction of different cell types and mediators. Among this, Th2 cells, mast cells, basophils and eosinophils are found in the inflamed tissue due to the attraction of chemokines. Of all the known chemokine receptors, the chemokine receptor CCR3 seems to play the major role in allergic diseases which is supported by the detection of this receptor on the cell types mentioned above. Therefore, academic and industrial research focus on compounds to block this receptor. To date, certain chemokine receptor antagonists derived from peptides and small molecules exist to block the chemokine receptor CCR3. However, the in vivo data about these compounds and the mechanisms of receptor interaction are poorly understood, as yet. For the development of additional chemokine receptor antagonists, more details about the interaction between the ligands and their receptors are required. Therefore, additional studies will lead to the identification of novel CCR3 chemokine receptor antagonists, which can be therapeutically used in allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis.     

Eosinophil chemotaxis by chemokines: a study by a simple photometric assay

BACKGROUND: The effects of a panel of 15 chemokines on eosinophil chemotaxis were studied by a new photometric assay which is both less tedious and less laborious than the conventional manual counting methods. Approximately 40 chemokines have been identified to date, but there is little information on the eosinophil migration-inducing ability of chemokines other than CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 3 ligands. METHODS: Eosinophil migration was measured by the Boyden chamber technique with a 96-well multiwell chamber and polycarbonate membrane filter. Eosinophil migration was assessed by determination of the eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) activity, and photometric measurement was performed with a microtiter plate reader. RESULTS: The assay was sensitive enough to detect 200 eosinophils, and the time required was within 4 h. CCR3 ligands, i.e., regulated on activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), eotaxin, eotaxin-2, and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-3, induced significant migration, while other chemokines showed no significant migration-inducing ability. Although the chemotaxis induction by these chemokines was efficiently inhibited by anti-CCR3 mAb, anti-CCR1 mAb failed to show any inhibitory effects. CONCLUSIONS: The photometric assay is suitable for analyzing a large number of samples. CCR3 ligands are the most important chemokines inducing eosinophil chemotaxis; thus, CCR3 represents a possible therapeutic target for the treatment of allergic diseases.     

嗜酸性粒细胞活化趋化因子与支气管哮喘的研究进展

嗜酸性粒细胞活化趋化因子(Eotaxin)是CC趋化因子家族成员之一,由结构性细胞和渗出性炎症细胞产生,是嗜酸性粒细胞、嗜碱性粒细胞和Th2型细胞因子的化学激活趋化剂,通过其受体(CCR3)选择性地诱导嗜酸性粒细胞在肺内黏附、募集和脱颗粒。     

CCR3 functional responses are regulated by both CXCR3 and its ligands CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11

The chemokine receptor CXCR3 is predominantly expressed on T lymphocytes, and its agonists CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 are IFN-gamma-inducible chemokines that promote Th1 responses. In contrast, the CCR3 agonists CCL11, CCL24 and CCL26 are involved in the recruitment of cells such as eosinophils and basophils during Th2 responses. Here, we report that although CCL11, CCL24 and CCL26 are neither agonists nor antagonists of CXCR3, CCL11 binds with high affinity to CXCR3. This suggests that, in vivo, CXCR3 may act as a decoy receptor, sequestering locally produced CCL11. We also demonstrate that the CXCR3 ligands inhibit CCR3-mediated functional responses of both human eosinophils and CCR3 transfectants induced by all three eotaxins, with CXCL11 being the most efficacious antagonist. The examination of CCR3-CCR1 chimeric constructs revealed that CCL11 and CXCL11 share overlapping binding sites contained within the CCR3 extracellular loops, a region that was previously shown to be essential for effective receptor-activation. Hence, eosinophil responses mediated by chemokines acting at CCR3 may be regulated by two distinct mechanisms: the antagonistic effects of CXCR3 ligands and the sequestration of CCL11 by CXCR3-expressing cells. Such interplay may serve to finely tune inflammatory responses in vivo.     

Murine lung eosinophil activation and chemokine production in allergic airway inflammation

Eosinophils play important roles in asthma and lung infections. Murine models are widely used for assessing the functional significance and mechanistic basis for eosinophil involvements in these diseases. However, little is known about tissue eosinophils in homeostasis. In addition, little data on eosinophil chemokine production during allergic airway inflammation are available. In this study, the properties and functions of homeostatic and activated eosinophils were compared. Eosinophils from normal tissues expressed costimulation and adhesion molecules B7-1, B7-2 and ICAM-1 for Ag presentation but little major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II, and were found to be poor stimulators of T-cell proliferation. However, these eosinophils expressed high levels of chemokine mRNA including C10, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, MIP-1γ, MIP-2, eotaxin and monocyte chemoattractant protein-5 (MCP-5), and produced chemokine proteins. Eosinophil intracellular chemokines decreased rapidly with concomitant surface marker downregulation upon in vitro culturing consistent with piecemeal degranulation. Lung eosinophils from mice with induced allergic airway inflammation exhibited increased chemokines mRNA expression and chemokines protein production and upregulated MHC class II and CD11c expression. They were also found to be the predominant producers of the CCR1 ligands CCL6/C10 and CCL9/MIP-1γ in inflamed lungs. Eosinophil production of C10 and MIP-1γ correlated with the marked influx of CD11b^high lung dendritic cells during allergic airway inflammation and the high expression of CCR1 on these dendritic cells (DCs). The study provided baseline information on tissue eosinophils, documented the upregulation of activation markers and chemokine production in activated eosinophils, and indicated that eosinophils were a key chemokine-producing cell type in allergic lung inflammation.     

Impaired CD4 and CD8 T cell phenotype and reduced chemokine secretion in recent-onset type 1 diabetic children

Although the role of the T cell-mediated autoimmune reaction in type 1 diabetes (T1D) is conclusive, studies including data from human circulating CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocytes subsets during the disease onset and posterior development are scarce. Further, chemokines and chemokine receptors are key players in the migration of pathogenic T cells into the islets of non-obese diabetic mice developing T1D, but few studies have investigated these markers in human T1D patients. We studied the expression of T helper 1 (Th1)- and Th2-associated chemokine receptors, and the two isoforms of CD45 leucocyte antigen on CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocytes from T1D and healthy children, as well as the secretion of chemokines in cell supernatants in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Our results showed increased expression of CCR7 and CD45RA and reduced CD45RO on CD8(+) cells among recent-onset T1D patients. The percentages of CD4(+) cells expressing CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3), CXCR6 and CCR5, and the secretion of interferon-gamma-induced protein-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha and MIP-1beta was lower among diabetics. Low expression of Th1-associated receptors and secretion of chemokines, together with an increased amount of CD8(+) cells expressing CD45RA and CCR7 in T1D patients therefore might represent suboptimal Th function in T1D, leading to impaired T cytotoxic responses or alternatively reflect a selective recruitment of Th1 cells into the pancreas.     

Chemokines induce eosinophil degranulation through CCR-3

BACKGROUND: Such CC chemokines as eotaxin and RANTES induce preferential eosinophil recruitment in allergic inflammation. They also elicit proinflammatory effector functions of eosinophils, such as enhanced adhesion and superoxide generation. Eosinophil degranulation by chemokines, however, has not been studied in detail. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify chemokines and their corresponding receptors that induce eosinophil degranulation by using a panel of chemokines and blocking antibodies to candidate receptors. METHODS: Highly purified eosinophils were preloaded with Fura-2 and stimulated with a panel of chemokine ligands for 14 known chemokine receptors: CCR1 to CCR8, CXCR1 to CXCR4, CX3CR1, and XCR1. Calcium influx was measured with fluorescence spectrometry. Eosinophils were also stimulated with the chemokines in the presence or absence of IL-5, and levels of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin were measured in the supernatant with RIA. Specific antibodies to chemokine receptors were used to block degranulation. RESULTS: Calcium influx was induced by monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP) 1, MCP-3, MCP-4, RANTES, eotaxin, IL-8, and stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha, which are chemokines that bind several chemokine receptors. However, degranulation was induced only by CCR3 ligands, including MCP-3, MCP-4, RANTES, and eotaxin. Priming of eosinophils with IL-5 enhanced CCR3 ligand-induced degranulation but did not cause non-CCR3 ligands to induce eosinophil-derived neurotoxin release. An antibody against CCR3 significantly inhibited degranulation induced by CCR3 ligands, eotaxin, or RANTES. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that chemokine-induced eosinophil degranulation, a major effector of eosinophil functions, is mediated through only CCR3, although some non-CCR3 ligands induce calcium influx in eosinophils. CCR3 may be an important target in the treatment of eosinophilic inflammation.     

Switch in chemokine receptor expression upon TCR stimulation reveals novel homing potential for recently activated T cells.

When naive T lymphocytes are activated and differentiate into memory/effector cells, they down-regulate receptors for constitutive chemokines such as CXCR4 and CCR7 and acquire receptors for inflammatory chemokines such as CCR3, CCR5 and CXCR3, depending on the Th1/Th2 polarization. This switch in chemokine receptor usage leads to the acquisition of the capacity to migrate into inflamed tissues. Using RNase protection assays, staining with specific antibodies, and response to recombinant chemokines, we now show that following TCR stimulation, memory/effector T cells undergo a further and transient switch in receptor expression. CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, CCR5, CCR6 and CXCR3 are down-regulated within 6 h, while CCR7, CCR4, CCR8 and CXCR5 are up-regulated for 2 to 3 days. Up-regulation of CCR7 following TCR stimulation was observed also among resting peripheral blood T cells and required neither co-stimulation nor exogenous IL-2. On the other hand IL-2 down-regulated CXCR5, up-regulated CCR8 and facilitated the recovery of CCR3 and CCR5. Upon TCR stimulation, Th1 and Th2 cells produced comparable sets of chemokines, including RANTES, macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta, I-309, IL-8 and macrophage-derived chemokine, which may modulate surface chemokine receptors and contribute to cell recruitment at sites of antigenic recognition. Altogether these results show that following TCR stimulation effector/memory T cells transiently acquire responsiveness to constitutive chemokines. As a result, T cells that are activated in tissues may either recirculate to draining lymph nodes or migrate to nearby sites of organized ectopic lymphoid tissues.     

Expression of CC and CXC chemokines and chemokine receptors in human leprosy skin lesions

We have investigated the expression of chemokines and their receptors in leprosy skin lesions using immunohistochemistry. Skin biopsies from 25 leprosy patients across the leprosy spectrum, 11 patients undergoing type I reversal reactions and four normal donors were immunostained by ABC peroxidase method using antibodies against CC and CXC chemokines and their receptors. Using an in situ hybridization technique we have also studied the expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), RANTES and interleukin (IL)-8 chemokines mRNA in leprosy skin lesions. Chemokines and receptor expression was detected in all leprosy skin biopsies. Expression of CC chemokines MCP-1 (P < 0.01) and RANTES (P < 0.01) were elevated significantly in borderline tuberculoid leprosy in reversal reaction compared to non-reactional borderline tuberculoid leprosy, but there was no difference in the expression of IL-8 chemokine. Surprisingly, there was no significant difference in the expression of CC (CCR2 and CCR5) and CXC (CXCR2) chemokine receptors across the leprosy spectrum. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the expression of mRNA for MCP-1, regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) and IL-8 chemokines. Here, the presence of a neutrophil chemoattractant IL-8 in leprosy lesions, which do not contain neutrophils, suggests strongly a role of IL-8 as a monocyte and lymphocyte recruiter in leprosy lesions. These results suggest that the chemokines and their receptors, which are known to chemoattract T lymphocytes and macrophages, are involved in assembling the cellular infiltrate found in lesions across the leprosy spectrum.     

T cell chemokine receptor expression in human Th1- and Th2-associated diseases

The interaction between chemokines and their receptors is an important step in the control of leukocyte migration into sites of inflammation. Chemokines also mediate a variety of effects independent of chemotaxis, including induction and enhancement of Th1- and Th2-associated cytokine responses. Recent studies have shown that human Th1 and Th2 clones, activated under polarizing conditions with polyclonal stimuli in vitro, display distinct patterns of chemokine receptor expression: Th1 clones preferentially express CCR5 and CXCR3, while many Th2 clones express CCR4, CCR8 and, to a lesser extent, CCR3. These differential patterns of chemokine receptor expression suggest a mechanism for selective induction of migration and activation of Th1- and Th2-type cells during inflammation and, perhaps, normal immune homoeostasis. Studies have begun to examine T cell chemokine receptor expression in vivo to determine the relevance of these in vitro observations to human Th1- and Th2-associated diseases. In this review, we critically examine recent reports of T cell chemokine receptor expression in human autoimmune disorders (multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis) and atopic disorders (allergic rhinitis and asthma) which are believed to arise from inappropriate Th1- and Th2-dominated responses, respectively.     

The relative activity of CXCR3 and CCR5 ligands in T lymphocyte migration: concordant and disparate activities in vitro and in vivo

In chronic inflammatory reactions such as rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis, T cells in the inflamed tissue express the chemokine receptors CXCR3 and CCR5, and the chemokine ligands (CCL) of these receptors are present in the inflammatory lesions. However, the contribution of these chemokines to T cell recruitment to sites of inflammation is unclear. In addition, the relative roles of the chemokines that bind CXCR3 (CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11) and CCR5 (CCL3, CCL4, CCL5) in this process are unknown. The in vitro chemotaxis and in vivo migration of antigen-activated T lymphoblasts and unactivated spleen T cells to chemokines were examined. T lymphoblasts migrated in vitro to CXCR3 ligands with a relative potency of CXCL10 > CXCL11 > CXCL9, but these cells demonstrated much less chemotaxis to the CCR5 ligands. In vivo, T lymphocytes were recruited in large numbers with rapid kinetics to skin sites injected with CXCL10 and CCL5 and less to CCL3, CCL4, CXCL9, and CXCL11. The combination of CCL5 with CXCL10 but not the other chemokines markedly increased recruitment. Coinjection of interferon-gamma, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interleukin-1alpha to up-regulate endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression with CXCL10 or CCL5 induced an additive increase in lymphoblast migration. Thus, CXCR3 ligands are more chemotactic than CCR5 ligands in vitro; however, in vivo, CXCL10 and CCL5 have comparable T cell-recruiting activities to cutaneous sites and are more potent than the other CXCR3 and CCR5 chemokines. Therefore, in vitro chemotaxis induced by these chemokines is not necessarily predictive of their in vivo lymphocyte-recruiting activity.     

Aminooxypentane-RANTES induces CCR3 activation and internalization of CCR3 from the surface of human eosinophils

Eosinophils are predominant effector cells in allergic diseases attracted by several CC chemokines into the inflammatory tissue. According to their important role in attracting leukocytes, several kinds of chemokine receptor antagonists have been developed. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of aminooxypentane (AOP)-RANTES on the activation of the CC chemokine receptor 3, CCR3, exemplary on human eosinophils, because they represent the dominant CCR3+ cell type. AOP-RANTES dose-dependently induced an increase of intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) and a release of reactive oxygen species, which could be inhibited by pertussis toxin, in human eosinophils from normal nonatopic donors. AOP-RANTES was as effective as RANTES but less effective than eotaxin and eotaxin-2 in the activation of the respiratory burst. Flow-cytometric analyses revealed that eosinophils constitutively expressed the CC chemokine receptors CCR1 and CCR3, whereas CCR5 was not expressed. AOP-RANTES, RANTES, eotaxin and eotaxin-2, but not Met-RANTES, induced a downregulation of CCR3 at 37 degrees C. Reexpression of CCR3 on eosinophils was observed within 120 min. Whereas no differences of CCR3 downregulation and recycling after stimulation with AOP-RANTES, RANTES, eotaxin and eotaxin-2 were found there exists a distinct profile of activity with respect to the activation of the respiratory burst in human eosinophils.     

Membrane-bound eotaxin-3 mediates eosinophil transepithelial migration in IL-4-stimulated epithelial cells

Epithelial cells play an important role in orchestrating mucosal immune responses. In allergic-type inflammation, epithelial cells control the recruitment of eosinophils into the mucosa. Th2-type cytokine-driven release of eosinophil-active chemokines from epithelial cells directs eosinophil migration into the mucosal epithelium. CCR3, the main eosinophil chemokine receptor, regulates this process; however, the respective contribution of individual CCR3 ligands in eosinophil transepithelial migration is less well understood. Using an in vitro transepithelial chemotaxis system, we found that eotaxin-3 produced by IL-4-stimulated airway epithelial cells and CCR3 on eosinophils exclusively mediate eosinophil transepithelial migration. Eotaxin-3 protein levels were also increased in the nasal mucosal epithelium recovered from allergic patients as compared to non-allergic patients. Surprisingly, eotaxin-3 in IL-4-stimulated airway epithelial cells was predominantly cell surface bound, and the cell surface form was critical for eosinophil transepithelial migration. Eotaxin-3 cell surface association was partially glycosaminoglycan (GAG) dependent, but was completely protein dependent, suggesting that eotaxin-3 associates with both GAG and cell surface proteins. We thus provide evidence that cell surface-associated eotaxin-3 is the critical IL-4-dependent chemotactic signal mediating eosinophil transepithelial migration in the setting of allergic inflammation.     

I-TAC/CXCL11 is a natural antagonist for CCR5

The selective CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) agonists, monokine induced by interferon-gamma (IFN- gamma)/CXC chemokine ligand 9 (CXCL9), IFN-inducible protein 10/CXCL10, and IFN-inducible T cell alpha chemoattractant (I-TAC)/CXCL11, attract CXCR3+ cells such as CD45RO+ T lymphocytes, B cells, and natural killer cells. Further, all three chemokines are potent, natural antagonists for chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3) and feature defensin-like, antimicrobial activities. In this study, we show that I-TAC, in addition to these effects, acts as an antagonist for CCR5. I-TAC inhibited the binding of macrophage-inflammatory protein-1alpha (MIP-1alpha)/CC chemokine ligand 3 (CCL3) to cells transfected with CCR5 and to monocytes. Furthermore, cell migration evoked by regulated on activation, normal T expressed and secreted (RANTES)/CCL5 and MIP-1beta/CCL4, the selective agonist of CCR5, was inhibited in transfected cells and monocytes, respectively. In two other functional assays, namely the release of free intracellular calcium and actin polymerization, I-TAC reduced CCR5 activities to minimal levels. Sequence and structure analyses indicate a potential role for K17, K49, and Q51 of I-TAC in CCR5 binding. Our results expand on the potential role of I-TAC as a negative modulator in leukocyte migration and activation, as I-TAC would specifically counteract the responses mediated by many "classical," inflammatory chemokines that act not only via CCR3 but via CCR5 as well.     

Systemic chemokine and chemokine receptor responses are divergent in allergic versus non-allergic humans

T(h)1- and T(h)2-polarized human T cell clones display distinct patterns of chemokine receptor expression and selective chemokine responsiveness in vitro. We hypothesized that natural exposure to environmental grass pollen would induce differential systemic chemokine and chemokine receptor expression patterns in individuals with allergic rhinitis compared to healthy controls with type 2- and type 1-dominated responses to allergen respectively. To this end, we compared chemokine receptor expression on peripheral blood T cells directly ex vivo and plasma chemokine levels between these two groups of study participants prior to and during the grass pollen season. T(h)1-associated CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR) 3 was strongly expressed on >50% CD4(+)/CD45RO(+) cells of all subjects. When examined longitudinally, CXCR3 expression increased over the grass pollen season (P < 0.0001), solely in non-allergic subjects. In contrast, for both allergic and non-allergic subjects, CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 5 (T(h)1-associated) and CCR3 (T(h)2-associated) were weakly expressed on <10% of CD4(+)/CD45RO(+) cells both prior to and during the grass pollen season. Type 1 chemokines CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL) 9 and CXCL10 (monokine induced by IFN-gamma and IFN-gamma-inducible protein of 10 kDa: CXCR3 ligands), and type 2 chemokines CC chemokine ligand (CCL) 11 (eotaxin: CCR3 ligand), CCL17 (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine: CCR4 ligand) and CCL22 (monocyte-derived chemokine: CCR4 ligand) were readily detectable in the plasma of most participants. Systemic CXCL9 levels decreased from pre- to grass pollen season in allergics (P < 0.05), whereas CCL17 decreased in non-allergics (P < 0.05) over the same period. Taken together, these longitudinal data suggest a systemic shift to more intensely type 1-dominated responses in non-allergic individuals and, conversely, to more type 2-dominated responses in allergic individuals upon natural re-exposure to grass pollen.     

Th2-cell-mediated chemokine synthesis is involved in allergic airway inflammation in mice

Eosinophilic inflammation in the bronchial mucosa has been recognized as a prominent pathological feature of bronchial asthma. Th2 cells have been implicated in the local infiltration and activation of eosinophils. The migration of eosinophils as well as Th2 cells is controlled by chemokines, suggesting a crucial role of chemokines in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma. To elucidate the mechanism by which Th2 cells induce eosinophilic inflammation, a Th2-cell-dependent murine model of asthma was employed in this study. Along with the infiltration of eosinophils and antigen-specific Th2 cells, CC chemokine receptor-3-active eotaxin, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-3 and RANTES, as well as CC chemokine receptor-3-inactive MCP-1 were produced in the lungs of Th2-cell-transferred mice after antigen provocation in vivo. On the other hand, differentiated antigen-specific Th2 cells produced MCP-3 and RANTES but not eotaxin or MCP-1 upon stimulation in vitro. Chemokines synthesized by Th2 cells and other cell types are involved in the development of eosinophilic inflammation in bronchial asthma.     

Enhanced allergen-induced airway inflammation in paucity of lymph node T cell (plt) mutant mice

BACKGROUND: Dendritic cells and lymphocytes play a central role in allergic asthma. Chemokines for these cells include the CCR7 agonists secondary lymphoid chemokine/CCL21 and EBV-induced lymphoid chemokine/CCL19, but their role in allergic asthma is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the effects of abrogation of lymphoid tissue expression of CCR7 agonists on allergic airway responses. METHODS: Paucity of lymphocyte T cell (plt) mutant mice, deficient in EBV-induced lymphoid chemokine/CCL19 and the lymphoid form of secondary lymphoid chemokine/CCL21, were evaluated in an established ovalbumin (OVA)-induced asthma model (plt-OVA group) and compared with similarly immunized +/+ BALB/c mice (+/+OVA group). RESULTS: APTI responses to methacholine increased similarly in OVA-challenged plt and +/+ mice. However, airway inflammation was strikingly enhanced in plt-OVA mutants over +/+OVA mice and included increased numbers of eosinophils, CD4 and B cells, neutrophils, and total leukocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and inflammatory cell cuffing around pulmonary arterioles. Enhanced airway inflammation was accompanied by an increase in lung T(H)2 activity, with increased levels of IL-4 and monocyte-derived chemoattractant/CCL22. CONCLUSIONS: Induction of allergic asthma in mutant mice with impaired CCR7 responses results in characteristics that resemble severe asthma in human subjects, including severe bronchial lymphocytosis, eosinophilia, and neutrophilia, but not in enhancement in airway hyperreactivity. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Disruption of chemokines responsible for trafficking of antigen-processing cells and lymphocytes to the draining lymph nodes might lead to enhanced allergic airway responses.     

Induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in C57BL/6 mice deficient in either the chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha or its CCR5 receptor

Macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha is a chemokine that is associated with Th1 cytokine responses. Expression and antibody blocking studies have implicated MIP-1alpha in multiple sclerosis (MS) and in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). We examined the role of MIP-1alpha and its CCR5 receptor in the induction of EAE by immunizing C57BL / 6 mice deficient in either MIP-1alpha or CCR5 with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG). We found that MIP-1alpha-deficient mice were fully susceptible to MOG-induced EAE. These knockout animals were indistinguishable from wild-type mice in Th1 cytokine gene expression, the kinetics and severity of disease, and infiltration of the central nervous system by lymphocytes, macrophages and granulocytes. RNase protection assays showed comparable accumulation of mRNA for the chemokines interferon-inducible protein-10, RANTES, macrophage chemoattractant protein-1, MIP-1beta, MIP-2, lymphotactin and T cell activation gene-3 during the course of the disease. CCR5-deficient mice were also susceptible to disease induction by MOG. The dispensability of MIP-1alpha and CCR5 for MOG-induced EAE in C57BL / 6 mice supports the idea that differential chemokine expression patterns represent differences in disease mechanism that underlie various models of EAE, and possibly distinct patterns of pathology seen in MS.