Durability of resin dentin interfaces: effects of surface moisture and adhesive solvent component.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the effects of different surface moisture on bond strength (BS) durability of an ethanol/water based, Single Bond (SB); an acetone-based, One-Step (OS); and a water-based, Syntac Single Component (SC) adhesive system to dentin. METHODS: Forty-five human third molars had their superficial dentin surface exposed flat by abrasion. The adhesives were applied to a delimited area of 52 mm(2) on either air-dried (30 s) or rewetted surfaces (2.5 or 4.0 microl) followed by resin composite build-ups. After storage in water at 37 degrees C (24 h), the teeth were sectioned to obtain bonded sticks with a cross-sectional area of 0.8 mm(2). The sticks, from each tooth, were divided, stored in water at 37 degrees C and tested either immediately or after 6 months (6 M) at 0.5 mm/min. BS was expressed as an index that considers cohesive failures and estimated values of premature debonded specimens. RESULTS: Three-way ANOVA showed statistically significant effects for moisture degree, storage time and double interactions (p < 0.05). While SB and SC achieved higher BS at 0 and 2.5 microl of water, for OS the BS was higher at 4.0 microl of water. Regardless of the moisture degrees, reductions in BS were observed after 6 M storage for SB and OS (p < 0.05), but not for SC (p > 0.05). No difference in BS between the 24 h and 6 M storage was found when the moisture was set at the extreme conditions. Significant reduction in BS was observed when the moisture was set at 2.5 microl. SIGNIFICANCE: The bond strength of different solvent-based adhesive systems gradually decreases over time, regardless of the variable moisture pattern used for the bonding procedure.     

The effect of a re-wetting agent on dentin bonding.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, a new generation of simplified one-bottle dentin bonding systems, sensitive to variations in the degree of substrate moisture, was introduced. This in vitro project compared the dentin bond strengths and interfacial ultra-morphology formed by three one-bottle bonding systems [OptiBond SOLO (ethanol-based), Prime&Bond 2.1 (acetone-based), and Single Bond (ethanol- and water-based)]. The null hypothesis tested was that re-wetting a dried dentin surface with a HEMA aqueous solution would not result in bond strengths, and resin impregnation into demineralized dentin, comparable to those obtained for moist dentin. METHODS: Dentin specimens were assigned to the following three etched surface conditions: moist dentin-control group; dentin dried for 5 s; and dentin dried for 5 s and re-moistened with a commercial 35% HEMA aqueous solution. Mean shear bond strengths were calculated and analyzed with one- and two-way ANOVA. Dentin discs treated with the same combination of surface condition/adhesive were processed and observed under both transmission and scanning electron microscopes. RESULTS: For moist dentin, the morphology of the resin-dentin interfaces showed penetration of the dentin adhesives to the depth of the transition between demineralized and unaffected dentin. Drying dentin for 5 s resulted in a significant decrease in mean bond strengths and an incompletely infiltrated collagen structure with areas of unveiled collagen fibers, regardless of the solvent. Re-wetting dentin with the aqueous HEMA solution re-established the level of bond strengths obtained to moist dentin and resulted in a raise of the fiber network with simultaneous increase in interfibrillar space dimensions. SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest that the use of an aqueous HEMA solution might compensate for the dryness induced on dentin surfaces by using air blasts from an air syringe, after rinsing off the etchant. As the behavior of the material that contained water was also affected by surface dryness, the percentage of water included in the composition of current ethanol- and water-based adhesives, such as Single Bond, may not be enough to compensate for the collapse of the collagen filigree upon drying.     

Effect of solvent and rewetting time on dentin adhesion.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the influence of solvent and rewetting time on microtensile dentin bond strengths of four dentin adhesives. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Sixty human molar specimens were divided into four dentin adhesive treatment groups: (1) a water-based total-etch dentin adhesive, EBS Multi; (2) an ethanol-based total-etch adhesive, Excite; (3) an acetone-based total-etch adhesive, Prime & Bond NT; and (4) an ethanol- and water-based total-etch adhesive, Single Bond. For each dentin adhesive, three specimens were assigned to five dentin moisture conditions. Specimens were tested in the tensile mode. RESULTS: When adhesives were applied to moist dentin, bond strengths varied from 26.2 MPa for Prime & Bond NT to 29.5 MPa for Single Bond without any statistical differences. When applied to dentin that had been dried for 15 seconds, Prime & Bond NT and Excite resulted in the lowest mean bond strengths, but they were statistically similar to each other (7.9 and 8.3 MPa, respectively). Single Bond resulted in a mean bond strength of 12.7 MPa, which was significantly lower than that of EBS Multi (24.1 MPa). For the latter, all mean bond strengths were statistically similar when some amount of moisture was present on the surface. For the other three adhesives, mean bond strengths returned to the range obtained on moist dentin only when dentin was rewet for 30 seconds. CONCLUSION: Bond strengths upon rewetting depend on the type of solvent in the bonding system, and rewetting time.     

A confocal microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin interface using adhesive systems with three different solvents bonded to dry and moist dentinan in vitro study.

OBJECTIVE: Total dehydration of acid-etched dentin is known to cause the collapse of collagen fiber, which leads to poor hybridization. Dentin-bonding systems with water as a solvent are found to rehydrate the collapsed collagen. Acetone-based adhesives are found to compete with moisture, and the acetone carries the resin deep into the dentin. The question arises whether to dry the dentin and use a water-based adhesive, or to keep the dentin moist and use an acetone- or alcohol-based adhesive. The aim of this study was to compare different bonding systems and techniques to assess which is most successful. A confocal microscope was used to evaluate the amount of hybrid layer formation and the depth of resin tag formation. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Superficial occlusal dentin specimens from 120 noncarious, freshly extracted human premolars were used for the study. The dentin was etched using 36% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds and then rinsed. The specimens were then randomly divided into 4 groups for different drying procedures: group I: air-dried for 30 seconds; group II: air-dried for 3 seconds; group Ill: blotted dry; group IV: overwet. The specimens were further subdivided into 3 groups to be tested with different bonding systems: subgroup A: acetone-based adhesive (Prime & Bond NT); subgroup B: water-based adhesive (Syntac Single Component); subgroup C: water- and ethanol-based adhesive (Single Bond). The resulting resin-dentin interfaces were then examined and categorized via confocal microscopy, and relative values were assigned to each specimen. RESULTS: Group IV (overwet) showed the lowest values, and the highest values were obtained in group III. The highest values were seen in group III, subgroup A (blotted dry, acetone-based bonding agent, Prime & Bond NT). CONCLUSION: Under these conditions, using these three bonding systems, maximum hybridization and resin tag formation was achieved using acetone-based adhesive on etched dentin kept moist by blot drying.     

The effect of different air-polishing powders on dentin bonding

PURPOSE: Air-polishing is routinely used for professional tooth cleaning. Therefore, the aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of different air-polishing powders on dentin bonding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dentin bond strengths of a resin composite (Clearfil AP-X) bonded with different classes of adhesives (4-step etch-and-rinse: Syntac; 3-step etch-and-rinse: OptiBond FL; 2-step etch-and-rinse: Single Bond Plus; 2-step self-etching: AdheSE, Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, One Coat Self-Etch Bond; all-in-one/mix: Xeno III; all-in-one/no mix: Clearfil S3 Bond, G-Bond) were measured on flattened dentin surfaces. In test groups, specimens were air polished with Prophypearls (calcium carbonate) or ClinPro Prophypowder (glycine) prior to bonding. Microtensile bond strengths were evaluated after 24 h of storage at 37 degrees C in water. Surfaces and resin-dentin interfaces were observed by SEM, TEM, and CLSM. RESULTS: Mean bond strengths varied from 18 to 73 MPa in control groups. Calcium carbonate air polishing generally caused significantly reduced dentin bond strengths (p < 0.05). TEM exhibited severe nanoleakage after calcium carbonate air polishing. Glycine did not affect dentin bonding performance of the adhesives under investigation. CONCLUSION: Calcium carbonate air polishing should be avoided when dentin-bonded restorations are applied. Glycine powder is an alternative.     

Effects of moisture degree and rubbing action on the immediate resin–dentin bond strength

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of moisture and rubbing action on the microtensile bond strength (BS) of an ethanol/water-based (Single Bond [SB]) and an acetone-based system (One-Step [OS]) to dentin. METHODS: On 60 human molars, a flat superficial dentin surface was exposed by wet abrasion. Two coats of the adhesives were applied on either a dry (D) or rewetted surface (W), under no rubbing action (NRA), slight (SRA) or vigorous rubbing action (VRA). After light curing (600 mW/cm2/10 s), composite build-ups were constructed incrementally and specimens were stored in water (37 degrees C/24 h). They were longitudinally sectioned in the "x" and "y" directions to obtain bonded sticks (0.8 mm2) to be tested in tension at 0.5 mm/min. Resultant BS was expressed as an index that includes bond strength values of the different fracture patterns and the specimens that failed during preparation for testing. The data were analyzed by a three-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison tests (95%). RESULTS: The interactions moisture/agitation and adhesive/agitation were statistically significant (p < 0.05). In D groups, the highest BS was obtained under VRA (37.11 +/- 7.3). In W groups, the BS at SRA (41.82 +/- 8.4) and VRA (38.89 +/- 8.2) were similar. For SB system, the SRA (33.6 +/- 8.3) and VRA groups (41.26 +/- 5.9) yielded similar BS while for OS the VRA was essential to reach high BS (34.2 +/- 8.4). SIGNIFICANCE: High BS to dentin can be obtained, under dry conditions, when ethanol/water and acetone-based systems, are vigorously agitated in the surface. On wet dentin, slight agitation seems to be enough to provide high BS to dentin.     

Ten‐years degradation of resin–dentin bonds

Hashimoto M, Fujita S, Nagano F, Ohno H, Endo K. Ten‐years degradation of resin–dentin bonds. Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118: 404–410. © 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 Eur J Oral Sci The purpose of this study was to evaluate the durability of resin–dentin bonds in 10‐yr water‐storage testing. Resin–dentin bonded bulk specimens were prepared using six commercially available resin adhesives. The resin–dentin bonded specimens were stored in water for 24 h (control group) or for 10 yr (experimental groups). After each storage period, the specimens were sectioned to make specimen beams and then subjected to a microtensile bond test. After the bond test, fractured surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition, interfacial observation of silver nanoleakage was performed using the backscatter electron mode of SEM. The bond strengths of four of the six adhesive systems tested decreased significantly after 10 yr. However, no significant bond‐strength reduction was recorded for the other two systems. The interfacial observations showed water tree propagation in the bonding resin layer as a typical morphological change after aging for five of the six adhesives tested. Water tree propagation may be a symptom of degradation in the resin bonding layer of resin–dentin bonds.     

Effect of smear layer thickness and acidity of self-etching solutions on early and long-term bond strength to dentin

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of smear layer thickness (SL) on early and 6-month bond strength (BS) of self-etching adhesives to dentin and to measure the ultimate microtensile strength (UTS) of the adhesives. METHODS: Clearfil SE Bond; Optibond Solo Plus Self-Etch Primer; Tyrian Self Priming Etchant (TY) and as controls, Single Bond (SB) and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SBMP) were applied on flat superficial dentin surface with thick and thin SL thicknesses. After adhesive's application (n=6) a resin build-up was made. After 24h, resin-dentin beams (0.8mm(2)) were prepared to be tested immediately and after 6-month (6M) at 0.5mm/min. For the UTS measurement, hour-glass specimens were prepared with the bonding resin alone or after mixing (1:1). BS values were analyzed by three-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison tests. Two-way ANOVA (bonding resin and bonding resin+self-etching primer) and Tukey's test were used for the UTS values. The bonding resins were re-evaluated separately by a one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test, since Single Bond is a one-bottle adhesive (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: The SL thickness was not significant (p=0.64). BS values were reduced after 6M, except for the SBMP. TY provided the lowest BS mean while SB and SBMP the highest BS. The UTS of the SBMP was the highest. TY yielded the lowest UTS. Regression analysis revealed a linear and significant relationship between the UTS of self-etch systems and the mean BS (R=0.95, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of a self-etching system does not seem to be dependent on the SL thickness. The total-etch, three-step system provided the highest BS to dentin and maintained the BS stable over 6 months. The performance of the self-etching systems can be envisaged by their UTS.     

牙本质粘接剂粘接强度与界面形态的研究

目的:采用一种新的界面处理方法,对不同类型牙本质粘接剂的粘接强度与界面形态进行研究.方法:选取人无龋磨牙,暴露咬合面牙本质,分别使用3 种粘接剂(Single Bond,SB;Clearfil SE Bond,SE;Clearfil S3 Bond,S3)制备粘接样本.粘接样本切割成粘接界面约为0.9 mm×0.9 mm的柱形小条,用微拉伸测力仪测试粘接强度(n=15).另外将粘接样本依次用6 mol/L盐酸、5%次氯酸钠和0.08 mg/ml透明质酸酶溶液处理,扫描电镜观察粘接界面形态.结果: 3 种粘接剂的牙本质粘接强度分别为:SB (35.50±6.40) MPa,SE (45.06±5.29) MPa,S3 (30.46±3.82) MPa,三者之间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).SB粘接界面的树脂突长约9～12 μm,部分样本出现混合层易与粘接剂层分离.SE形成的树脂突长约9～14 μm,无混合层与粘接剂层分离现象.使用S3后,树脂突稀疏,长约4～7 μm,混合层与粘接剂层结合紧密.结论:牙本质粘接剂的粘接界面形态与粘接强度存在一定的相关性.     

In vivo influence of residual moisture on microtensile bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives

Purpose: This study evaluated the microtensile bond strengths of three dentin adhesives applied on clinically moist dentin or on dentin that was dried with air for 5 seconds. The null hypothesis to test was that the level of residual moisture does not influence bond strengths when restorations are placed in vivo.
Materials and Methods: Twenty-four premolars scheduled to be extracted for orthodontic reasons from patients between the ages of 15 and 23 years were restored with one of the following adhesive systems followed by a mini hybrid composite resin: Excite (Ivoclar/Vivadent), an ethanol-based dentin adhesive; Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply/Caulk), an acetone-based dentin adhesive; and Single Bond (3M ESPE), an ethanol and water-based dentin adhesive. After extraction, the specimens were sectioned with a slow-speed diamond saw in two perpendicular directions to obtain sticks with a cross-section of 0.7 ± 0.2 mm². The specimens were attached to a Geraldeli device and fractured using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm per minute.
Results: For each dentin adhesive, there were no statistical differences between means for dry dentin versus moist dentin. Single Bond and Prime & Bond NT ranked in the same statistical subset regardless of the moisture condition of the substrate. Both Excite, dry, and Excite, moist, resulted in statistically lower bond strengths than Single Bond, moist, but similar to those of Single Bond, dry, Prime & Bond NT, moist, and Prime & Bond NT, dry.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
In this study, the level of residual moisture did not influence microtensile bond strengths. Clinically, the degree of moisture left on the dentin surface upon rinsing off the etching gel may not be as relevant as previously reported in laboratory studies.     

Durability of resin-dentin bonds related to water and oil storage

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term effects of etching time, adhesive system and storage condition on resin bond strength to dentin. METHODS: Twenty-five extracted human third molars had a flat dentin surface exposed. Two total-etch adhesives, Single Bond (SB) and One-Step (OS), and one self-etching adhesive system, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V (CL), were used. The adhesives were bonded to dentin according to their respective manufacturer's instructions. Additional groups of SB and OS systems were created, in which the phosphoric acid etching time was doubled (30 seconds). After bonding, build-up crowns were constructed incrementally with Z250 resin composite and the teeth were stored for 24 hours in distilled water at 37 degrees C. The teeth were serially and vertically sectioned to obtain several bonded beams with approximately 0.8 mm2 of cross-sectional area. Beams were tested in microtensile (0.6 mm/minute) either immediately (control) or after storage for 6 months or 1 year in either distilled water or mineral oil. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: Significant reductions (P< 0.05) in bond strength were observed after both long-term storage periods in water for all the materials, regardless of the etching time for SB and OS. Bond strengths were either preserved or increased in specimens stored in oil.     

Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of two dentin adhesives applied on dry vs moist dentin

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of substrate moisture on the clinical behavior of two dentin adhesives after 18 months. The null hypothesis tested was that drying dentin with air upon rinsing off the acid would not influence the clinical performance of two dentin adhesives as compared to leaving the preparation visibly moist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled in this study. One hundred twenty-eight restorations divided into 4 groups were inserted and evaluated at baseline: (1) NT/Moist - Prime & Bond NT, an acetone-based adhesive, applied on moist dentin; (2) NT/Dried - Prime & Bond NT applied on dentin dried with air for 3 to 4 s; (3) SB/Moist - Single Bond, an ethanol- and water-based adhesive, applied on moist dentin; (4) SB/Dried - Single Bond applied on dentin dried with air for 3 to 4 s. A microfilled composite resin was used for all restorations. Patients were recalled at 6 and 18 months. RESULTS: At 18 months after initial placement, 110 restorations (86% recall rate) were re-evaluated. Retention rates at 18 months were 92% for NT/Moist, 93% for NT/Dried, 100% for SB/Moist, and 89% for SB/Dried. No statistically significant differences were found among groups for retention rate. Both NT/Moist and SB/Moist resulted in a significant decrease in sensitivity to air from baseline to 18 months. When data were pooled for the variable "substrate moisture", SB resulted in an overall retention rate of 95%, while NT resulted in a retention rate of 92% (statistically similar). The marginal adaptation with SB was significantly worse at 18 months than at baseline. CONCLUSION: The moisture level of the dentin substrate in noncarious cervical lesions does not influence retention of composite restorations, but moist conditions caused less sensitivity to air. When applied as per manufacturers' instructions (moist dentin), both adhesives resulted in Class V retention rates exceeding the ADA 18-month full acceptance guidelines.     

Effect of solvent type on microtensile bond strength of a total-etch one-bottle adhesive system to moist or dry dentin

This study evaluated the effect of organic solvent (acetone or ethanol) on the microtensile bond strengths (MTBS) of an adhesive system applied to dry and moist dentin. Sixteen extracted human third molars were ground to expose a flat occlusal dentin surface and acid etched for 20 seconds (20% phosphoric acid gel, Gluma Etch 20 Gel, Heraeus/Kulzer). After rinsing the acid etchant, an ethanol-based one-bottle adhesive system was applied to the mesial half of the occlusal dentin surface. An acetone-based, one-bottle adhesive system was applied to the distal half of the ground dentin surface. The teeth were randomly assigned to groups. In Group 1, the etched dentin was thoroughly air dried and an ethanol-based one-bottle adhesive system was applied (Gluma Comfort Bond, Heraeus/Kulzer) (GCB). In Group 2, the etched dentin was thoroughly air dried and an acetone-based one-bottle adhesive system was applied (Gluma One Bond, Heraeus/Kulzer)(GOB). In Group 3, excess moisture was removed after acid etching, leaving a moist dentin surface and a one-bottle ethanol-based adhesive was applied (Gluma Comfort Bond). In Group 4, excess moisture was removed after acid etching, leaving a moist dentin surface and an acetone-based adhesive was applied (Gluma One Bond). A hybrid resin composite (Venus, Heraeus/Kulzer) was applied to the bonded surface in four 1-mm increments and light cured according to manufacturer's directions. The specimens were then sectioned with a slow-speed diamond saw in two perpendicular directions to obtain sticks with a cross-section of 0.5 +/- 0.05 mm2. The microtensile bond strength (MTBS) test was performed with a Bencor device in an Instron machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. The data were subjected to a two-way ANOVA and Scheffé Post hoc test (p < 0.05). The experimental MTBS measured for dry dentin were Group 1 = 37.0 +/- 10.6 and Group 2 = 34.7 +/- 9.0 in MPa (mean +/- SD); and on moist dentin, Group 3 = 50.7 +/- 11.0 and Group 4 = 38.5 +/- 10.5 in MPa (mean +/- SD). The ethanol based adhesives resulted in higher MTBS than acetone-based adhesive (p < 0.008) and bonding to moist dentin resulted in higher MTBS (p < 0.001). GCB applied on moist dentin resulted in statistically higher bond strengths than the other groups. The highest MTBS were achieved with the use of an ethanol-based adhesive to moist dentin.     

Biomodification to dentin by a natural crosslinker improved the resin-dentin bonds

ObjectivesTransient collagen cross-linking treatment by proanthocyanidins (PA), a natural crosslinker, was proved to increase the cross-linking degree and ultimate tensile strength of demineralised dentin. The present study aimed to investigate whether transient pretreatment by PA-based preconditioner can improve the resin–dentin bonds of various etch and rinse adhesives. The influence of solvent type, PA concentration and treatment duration were examined.MethodsPA-based preconditioners were prepared by adding powdered grape seed extract, rich in PA, to various solvents at different concentrations. They were used on demineralised dentin before the application of the bonding agent. Bond strength, failure modes and degree of conversion were evaluated via microtensile testing, field emission scanning electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, respectively.ResultsCollagen cross-linking treatment by PA-based preconditioners presented a concentration- and time-dependent increase in dentin bond strength even in reduced, clinically applicable treatment duration. PA preconditioning improved bond strength of the tested water/ethanol-based adhesive better than the water/acetone-based system. Mixed fracture was the most prevalent failure mode happened on the top of the hybrid layer in PA-pretreated specimens, whilst at the bottom in non-treated controls. The degree of conversion was not significantly affected by PA pretreatment.ConclusionsTransient PA preconditioning improved resin–dentin bonds without compromise on the curing behaviours of the tested adhesives.     

效前挥发对丙酮基牙本质粘结剂微拉伸强度的影响

目的:研究含有丙酮的牙本质粘结系统在较长时间的多次使用后,效前挥发对其微拉伸粘结强度的影响。方法:选用3种含有丙酮的牙本质湿粘结系统GlumaOne-Bond、Bond-1和One-Step,每天在9时和15时各打开密封盖1min,分别测试和比较各粘结系统在第0天、第7天、14天和21天时的微拉伸强度。结果:2种粘结系统GlumaOne-Bond和One-Step在使用7天后,粘结强度没有明显变化,在使用14天和21天后,微拉伸粘结强度有明显的下降,下降幅度分别为10.4%、11.2%、13.3%、12.4%;Bond-1的微拉伸粘结强度在4个测试点的强度都没有明显差别。结论:多次使用后的效前挥发对部分含有丙酮的牙本质粘结系统的粘结强度有一定的影响。     

Durability of resin-dentin bonds: effects of direct/indirect exposure and storage media.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the longevity of resin-dentin bonds of three adhesives using different storage media and specimen size. METHODS: Flat dentin surfaces from extracted human third molars were bonded with: a two-step etch-and-rinse self-priming adhesive (Single Bond), a two-step self-etching adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond), and a one-step self-etching adhesive (One-Up Bond F). Composite build-ups were constructed. The bonded teeth were stored under three conditions: dry, distilled water, or mineral oil. Half of the specimens were stored as intact bonded teeth (Indirect Exposure/IE). The other half were first sectioned into beams and stored under same conditions (Direct Exposure/DE). After storage periods of 24h, 3 months or 1 year, the intact teeth (IE) were sectioned into beams and both subgroups (DE and IE) were tested for microtensile bond strengths. Results were analyzed with multiple ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests. Fractographic analysis was performed by SEM. RESULTS: After 24h, Single Bond and Clearfil SE Bond performed equally and were superior to One-Up Bond F. After 3 months of DE to water storage, decreases in bond strengths were observed for Single Bond and One-Up Bond F, this decrease occurred for Clearfil SE Bond after 12 months of water storage. Bonded specimens aged in dry did not alter bond strengths over time. Bond strength increased when Single Bond was stored in mineral oil after 3 and 12 months. Micromorphological alterations were evident after water storage. SIGNIFICANCE: Although dentin bond strength of all the adhesives fell over time in DE, SE Bond fells the least.     

The influence of light intensities irradiated directly and indirectly through resin composite to self-etch adhesives on dentin bonding

This study was designed to evaluate effects of light-irradiated intensities directly and indirectly through resin composites to one- and two-step self-etch adhesives on dentin bonding. One-step (Clearfil S(3) Bond; TS, Bond Force; BF) or two-step (Clearfil SE Bond; SE) self-etch adhesives was applied to dentin surface. The adhesive agent was light-cured with light-intensity of 350 or 600 mW/cm(2), and then resin composite with different colors (translucent or opaque shade) was filled and light-cured with the same light-intensity as the bonding procedure. After 24 h water storage, bond strengths to dentin were determined using μTBS test. For the 600 and 350 mW/cm(2) groups, translucent shade resin obtained higher μTBS than opaque shade resin. Using SE and BF, the 350 mW/cm(2) group in translucent shade resin was higher μTBS than the 600 mW/cm(2) group in opaque shade resin, while TS showed no different μTBS between them.     

Effect of hydrostatic pulpal water pressure on microtensile bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of pulpal pressure on the microtensile bond strength of four self-etch adhesives to dentin. A total-etch adhesive was added for comparison. METHODS: 60 freshly extracted human third molars were selected. For each tooth, the root was removed below the cemento-enamel junction. A second parallel section was made to remove the coronal enamel to form a crown segment. The root portion of the resulting crown segment was cemented to a Plexiglas platform using cyanoacrylate cement. The crown segment was then connected with a plastic tube to a water column to produce a pressure of 20 cm H2O at the prepared dentin surface of the crown segment. The adhesive materials were: a total-etch adhesive (Scotchbond 1) and four self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond, Hybrid Bond, Futurabond NR, and AdheSE Bond). The tested adhesives were applied to the dentin surface in three test procedures: applied to dentin without pulpal pressure, applied to dentin with pulpal pressure for 24 hours, and applied to dentin with pulpal pressure and the pressure was maintained for 6 months during storage. Grandio resin composite was placed in 3-4 layers to a height of 5-6 mm to form a crown segment. For bond strength measurement, the composite-dentin segment was removed from the Plexiglas. This segment was then sectioned to prepare the specimens for microtensile bond measurement. RESULTS: None of the tested adhesives showed bond strength reduction when applied to dentin supplied with water pressure. After 6 months of pulpal pressure, Scotchbond 1, Clearfil SE Bond and AdheSE Bond showed significant reduction in bond strength (P < 0.05). In contrast, Futurabond NR and Hybrid Bond were not significantly affected.     

Dentin regional bond strength of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of self-etch (with or without H(3)PO(4)-etching) and total-etch bonding systems bonded to different regions of dentin. METHODS: Long flat dentin cavity preparations extending from top-crown to root-apex within the same tooth were performed and bonded: using two-step (Clearfil SE Bond/SEB, Resulcin Aqua Prime/RES) and one-step (Etch & Prime 3.0/EP, One-Up Bond F/OUB, Prompt L-Pop/PLP, Solist/SOL and Futurabond/FUT) self-etch adhesives; these same adhesives were also applied following H(3)PO(4)-etching of dentin and finally two more groups were bonded with total-etch adhesives (Single Bond/SB and Prime & Bond NT/PBNT). Build-ups of resin composite were constructed incrementally to ensure sufficient bulk for the MTBS test and the different regions of dentin were identified by painting with different colours on the top of the resin composite. Specimens were sliced into beams and tested in tension. ANOVA and multiple comparisons tests were used (p<0.05). RESULTS: Regardless of the tested dentin region, SEB attained the highest MTBS to smear layer-covered surfaces (i.e., coronal dentin: 42.7MPa), while H(3)PO(4)-etching of dentin hampered bonds (i.e., coronal dentin: 27.7MPa). When bonding with PBNT, SB, RES, EP, PLP, SOL and FUT, MTBS was similar for different dentin regions. H(3)PO(4)-etching of dentin did not alter the attained MTBS. SIGNIFICANCE: SEB yielded the highest MTBS to all regions of dentin. When bonding to parallel-cut dentin, previous H(3)PO(4)-etching of dentin did not increase MTBS and differences in bond strength among dentin regions were absent.     

The effect of additional etching and curing mechanism of composite resin on the dentin bond strength

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of additional acid etching and curing mechanism (light-curing or self-curing) of a composite resin on the dentin bond strength and compatibility of one-step self-etching adhesives.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen human permanent molars were randomly divided into eight groups according to the adhesives used (All-Bond Universal: ABU, Clearfil S3 Bond: CS3), additional acid etching (additional acid etching performed: EO, no additional acid etching performed: EX), and composite resins (Filtek Z-250: Z250, Clearfil FII New Bond: CFNB). Group 1: ABU-EO-Z250, Group 2: ABU-EO-CFNB, Group 3: ABU-EX-Z250, Group 4: ABU-EX-CFNB, Group 5: CS3-EO-Z250, Group 6: CS3-EO-CFNB, Group 7: CS3-EX-Z250, Group 8: CS3-EX-CFNB. After bonding procedures, composite resins were built up on dentin surfaces. After 24-hour water storage, the teeth were sectioned to make 10 specimens for each group. The microtensile bond strength test was performed using a microtensile testing machine. The failure mode of the fractured specimens was examined by means of an optical microscope at ×20 magnification. The data was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Scheffe''s post-hoc test (α=.05).

RESULTS

Additional etching groups showed significantly higher values than the no additional etching group when using All-Bond Universal. The light-cured composite resin groups showed significantly higher values than the self-cured composite resin groups in the Clearfil S3 Bond.

CONCLUSION

The additional acid etching is beneficial for the dentin bond strength when using low acidic one-step self-etch adhesives, and low acidic one-step self-etch adhesives are compatible with self-cured composite resin. The acidity of the one-step self-etch adhesives is an influencing factor in terms of the dentin bonding strength and incompatibility with a self-cured composite resin.