Long-Term Graft and Patient Outcomes Following Kidney Transplantation in End-Stage Kidney Disease Secondary to Hyperoxaluria

BackgroundEnd-stage kidney disease secondary to hyperoxaluria presents a major challenge for transplant physicians given concern regarding disease recurrence. Few contemporary studies have reported long-term outcomes following transplantation in this population.MethodsThis study examined the outcomes of all adult patients with end-stage kidney disease secondary to hyperoxaluria who received a kidney or combined liver-kidney transplant in Australia and New Zealand between 1965 and 2015. Patients with hyperoxaluria were propensity score matched to control patients with reflux nephropathy. The primary outcome was graft survival. Secondary outcomes included graft function, acute rejection, and patient survival.ResultsNineteen transplants performed in 16 patients with hyperoxaluria were matched to 57 transplants in patients with reflux nephropathy. Graft survival was inferior in patients with hyperoxaluria receiving a kidney transplant alone (subhazard ratio [SHR] = 3.83, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-12.08, P = .02) but not in those receiving a combined liver-kidney transplant (SHR = 0.63, 95% CI, 0.08-5.21, P = .67). Graft failure risk was particularly high in patients with hyperoxaluria receiving a kidney transplant alone after more than 1 year of renal replacement therapy (SHR = 8.90, 95% CI, 2.35-33.76, P = .001). Posttransplant estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in patients with hyperoxaluria (10.97 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI, 0.53-21.42, P = .04). There was no difference between groups in the risk of acute rejection or death with a functioning graft.ConclusionCompared to reflux nephropathy, hyperoxaluria was associated with inferior graft survival in patients receiving a kidney transplant alone. Long-term graft function was lower in patients with hyperoxaluria, but the risks of acute rejection and death were not different.     

Preemptive kidney transplantation in systemic lupus erythematosus

Preemptive kidney transplantation is associated with superior outcomes. Patients who have kidney failure due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may not receive a preemptive kidney transplant because of the concern for risk of disease recurrence with shortened graft and patient survival. We identified 8001 patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing dataset who underwent kidney transplantation between October 1987 and February 2009 with kidney failure due to SLE. Seven hundred thirty patients received a preemptive kidney transplant with 7271 patients who were on dialysis before transplantation; their mean ages were 40.0 ± 11.6 years and 36.9 ± 11.7 years, respectively, (P < .01). Women constituted 82.5% of preemptive and 81.4% of non-preemptive groups (P = .47). Preemptive transplant recipients were more likely to receive a living donor kidney transplant (odds ratio [OR] = 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.3–4.5; P < .01). In unadjusted analyses, preemptive transplantation was associated with lower risk of recipient death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.38–0.70; P < .01). The difference remained significant after adjustment fr covariates (HR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.36–0.84; P < .01). Graft survival was also superior among preemptive kidney transplant recipients in both unadjusted (HR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.49–0.68; P < .01), and adjustment analyses (HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.55–0.86; P < .01). We concluded that preemptive kidney transplantation among patients with SLE was associated with superior patient and graft outcomes and should be considered when feasible.     

Risk factors for and outcomes of delayed graft function in live donor kidney transplantation – a retrospective study

Delayed graft function (DGF) in deceased donor kidney transplantation is associated with worse outcomes. DGF has been less well studied in live donor transplantation. We aimed to examine the risk factors for DGF, and associations between DGF and short‐ and long‐term outcomes in live donor kidney transplant recipients. Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, we included live donor kidney transplants performed in Australia and New Zealand over 2004–2015 and excluded pediatric recipients (n = 440), pathological donors (n = 97), grafts that failed in the first week (as a proxy for primary non function; n = 38), and grafts with missing DGF data (n = 46). We used multivariable logistic regression to identify the risk factors for DGF and the association between DGF and rejection at 6 months; Cox proportional hazards models to examine the relationship between DGF and patient and graft survival; and linear regression to examine the association between DGF and eGFR at 1 year. DGF occurred in 77 (2.3%) of 3358 transplants. Risk factors for DGF included right‐sided kidney [odds ratio (OR) 2.00 (95% CI 1.18, 3.40)], donor BMI [OR 1.06 per kg/m² (95% CI 1.01, 1.12)]; increasing time on dialysis and total ischemic time [OR 1.09 per hour (1.00, 1.17)]. DGF was associated with increased risk of rejection at 6 months [OR 2.37 (95% CI 1.41, 3.97)], worse patient survival [HR 2.14 (95% CI 1.21, 3.80)] and graft survival [HR 1.98 (95% CI 1.27, 3.10)], and worse renal function at 1 year [Coefficient ‐9.57 (95% CI ?13.5, ?5.64)]. DGF is uncommon after live donor kidney transplantation, but associated with significantly worse outcomes. The only modifiable risk factors identified were kidney side and total ischemic time.     

Single‐center experience with third and fourth kidney transplants

Kidney retransplantation is often associated with a higher immunological risk than is primary renal transplantation. Faced with increasing organ shortage and growing waiting lists, results of kidney retransplantation are of particular interest. Fifty‐six third and fourth kidney transplants were analyzed retrospectively. Parameters included patient and donor demographics, operative details, incidence of surgical, immunological and infectious complications and patient and graft survival. Patients receiving third kidney grafts had 1‐ and 5‐year patient/graft survival rates of 97.4%/72.9% and 88.9%/53.6%, respectively. Episodes of acute rejection and delayed graft function were observed in 44% and 49% of these patients. Fourth kidney transplantation was associated with 1‐ and 2‐year patient/graft survival rates of 84.8%/68.5% and 63.6%/47%, respectively. Acute rejection and delayed graft function occurred in 33% and in 60% of cases. Acceptable patient and graft survival may be achieved after third and fourth kidney transplantation. Graft losses in this sensitized population are mainly because of rejection. Profound immunosuppression may lead to major infectious problems.     

Modifiable factors predicting patient survival in elderly kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Elderly transplant candidates represent an increasingly important group on the waiting list for kidney transplantation. Yet the factors that determine posttransplantation outcomes in this population remain poorly defined. METHODS: We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study involving all patients aged 60 years or older who received a first cadaveric kidney transplantation between 1985 and 2000 in the province of Quebec. The main outcomes were patient survival, overall graft survival, and treatment failure (patient death or graft loss within the first posttransplant year). Survival analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazard model. Logistic regression identified factors predicting treatment failure. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, the modifiable factors associated with patient survival were active smoking at transplantation [hazard ratio (HR) 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-3.60)], body mass index (BMI) (HR 1.34 for a 5-point increase, 95% CI 1.05-1.67), and time on dialysis before transplantation (HR 1.10 for a 1-year increase, 95% CI 1.02-1.18). The only modifiable factor associated with graft survival was active smoking at transplantation (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.24-3.30). Treatment failure was associated with time on dialysis before transplantation (odds ratio for dialysis >/=2 years 3.28, 95% CI 1.34-7.9). CONCLUSION: Our results show that active smoking, obesity, and time on dialysis before transplantation are modifiable risk factors associated with an increased risk of mortality after transplantation in elderly recipients. They represent potential targets for interventions aimed at improving patient and graft survival in elderly patients.     

Effect of interleukin‐2 receptor antibody therapy on acute rejection risk and severity,long‐term renal function,infection and malignancy‐related mortality in renal transplant recipients

In renal transplantation, the use of interleukin‐2 receptor antibody (IL‐2Ra) has been associated with reduced rejection rates, but the effect of this agent on rejection severity and type, long‐term graft function and risk of infection and malignancy‐related mortality remains unclear. Using Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, all live‐ and deceased‐donor renal transplant recipients in Australia between 2000 and 2006 were included. Of the 3344 renal transplant recipients, 1874 (56.0%) received no induction and 1470 (44.0%) had received IL‐2Ra. Compared with no induction, IL‐2Ra was associated with reduced rejection risk (relative risk 0.70, 95% CI 0.60, 0.81) and higher estimated glomerular filtration rate at 5 years (difference in means 3.51, 95% CI 0.83, 6.19). Severity and type of rejection were similar in both the groups. The adjusted rate of death attributed to malignancy for no induction and IL‐2Ra per 1000 patient‐years was 1.48 and 1.63, respectively, whereas death attributed to infection was 2.42 and 2.16 respectively. This registry analysis demonstrates that IL‐2Ra induction in kidney transplantation is associated with substantial clinical benefits of reduced risk of acute rejection and improved long‐term graft function without an increase in adverse events.     

Kidney Transplant Rejection in Australia and New Zealand: Relationships Between Rejection and Graft Outcome

Although acute rejection rates have fallen over time, how this relates to graft outcomes is not known. Using data from the ANZDATA Registry, we examined associations of rejection within six months of transplantation with graft and patient outcomes among kidney-only transplants performed between April 1997 and December 2004 in Australia and New Zealand. Associations of biopsy histology with outcomes of the rejection episode were also examined. Outcomes were examined among 4325 grafts with 1961 rejection episodes in total. Crude rejection rates have fallen by one-third over that time, but rates of graft survival are constant. The occurrence of acute rejection was associated with an increased risk of graft loss after 6 months (HR, adjusted for donor and recipient characteristics, 1.69 [1.36-2.11], p<0.001). Late rejection (first rejection >or=90 days) was associated with higher risk of graft loss (adjusted HR 2.46 [1.70-3.56], p<0.001). Vascular rejection was also associated with a higher risk of graft loss 2.07 [95% CI 1.60-2.68], p<0.001. The occurrence of acute rejection is associated with an ongoing increased risk of graft loss, particularly if that episode occurred late or included vascular rejection. The reduced rates of rejection have not been associated with improved graft survival.     

肾移植1180例次生存分析

目的 总结我院２２年来临床肾移植的效果,分析探讨影响肾移植存活预后因素。方法 对我院１９７７年１０月至１９９９年６月间所作的１１８０例次（１０３９例患者）尸体肾移植的临床资料进行随访总结。并对可能影响移植肾存活的诸因素,如受者性别、受者年龄、移植次数、供者年龄、供受者性别配对、供受者血型配合、淋巴细胞毒交叉试验、冷缺血时间、延迟肾功能、肾功能正常时间、免疫者性别配对、供受者血型配合、淋巴细胞毒交叉     

Influence of Recipient Race on the Outcome of Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation

Racial differences on the outcome of simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation have not been well studied. We compared mortality and graft survival of African Americans (AA) recipients to other racial/ethnic groups (non‐AA) using the national data. We studied a total of 6585 adult SPK transplants performed in the United States between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2007. We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine risk factors associated with early graft failure and immune‐mediated late graft loss. We used conditional Kaplan–Meier survival and multivariate Cox regression analyses to estimate late death‐censored kidney and pancreas graft failure and death between the groups. Although there was no racial disparity in the first 90 days, AA patients had 38% and 47% higher risk for late death‐censored kidney and pancreas graft failure, respectively (p = 0.006 and 0.001). AA patients were twice more likely to lose the kidney and pancreas graft due to rejection (OR 2.31 and 1.86, p = 0.002 and 0.008, respectively). Bladder pancreas drainage was associated with inferior patient survival (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.15, 1.75, p = 0.001). In the era of modern immunosuppresion, AA SPK transplant patients continue to have inferior graft outcome. Additional studies to explore the mechanisms of such racial disparity are warranted.     

Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal from Sirolimus-Based Therapy in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal has been used as a strategy to improve renal allograft function, however, it also carries risk of acute rejection. We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials that involved CNI withdrawal from a sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen. The search strategy yielded six trials (n = 1047 patients) reported in eight publications. CNI withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy, was associated with an increased risk of acute rejection (risk difference, 6%; 95% CI 2-10%, p = 0.002) but a higher creatinine clearance (mean difference, 7.49 mL/min; 95% CI 5.08-9.89 mL/min, p < 0.00001) at 1 year compared to continued CNI and sirolimus therapy. Graft loss (relative risk, 0.87; 95% CI 0.46-1.64, p = 0.66) and death (relative risk, 0.88; CI 0.40-1.96, p = 0.76) were similar in both groups at 1 year. Hypertension was significantly reduced in the CNI withdrawal group (relative risk, 0.56; 95% CI 0.40-0.78, p = 0.0006). CNI withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy is associated with an increased risk of acute rejection in the short term with a significant improvement in renal function and a reduction in hypertension. Longer follow-up is needed to determine if these changes will result in a significant improvement in patient and graft survival.     

Long-term graft outcome with mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine: A paired kidney analysis

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials and U.S. Registry data have demonstrated that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) reduces acute rejection rates and improves graft survival. We undertook the first paired kidney analysis comparing the effects of MMF and azathioprine on graft outcome in the United Kingdom. METHODS: In all, 238 deceased donors from 1999 to 2002 who donated one kidney to a patient treated with MMF and the other kidney to a patient treated with azathioprine were identified from the national transplant database held by U.K. Transplant. Graft function and rates of change of graft function were compared using multiple linear regression analyses adjusting for covariates on an intention-to-treat basis. Incidence of acute rejection and delayed graft function were studied using logistic regression. Patient and graft survival censored for death were evaluated with Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: The MMF-treated patients exhibited a nonsignificant trend towards improved graft function but with increased rejection rates (44% versus 31%, P < 0.01). Treatment with MMF did not reduce delayed graft function rates. Univariate analysis showed that graft survival was inferior in MMF-treated patients (90% versus 95%, log-rank, P = 0.02) but in multivariate Cox regression models, MMF treatment was not a significant factor. Surprisingly, in the first year 32% of patients achieved daily doses of less than 2 g of MMF compared to 18% of patients who received less than 100 mg of azathioprine (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In this real-life study, there was no difference in patient or graft outcome between MMF and azathioprine treated groups despite increased rejection rates in patients receiving MMF therapy.     

Is pre‐transplant sensitization against angiotensin II type 1 receptor still a risk factor of graft and patient outcome in kidney transplantation in the anti‐HLA Luminex era? A retrospective study

We aimed to assess the correlation of anti‐angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (anti‐AT1R‐Abs) before transplantation on a multicentric cohort of kidney transplant recipients (2008–2012), under tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), screened by Luminex technology for anti‐HLA immunization. Anti‐AT1R antibody levels were measured by ELISA in pretransplantation sera of 940 kidney recipients from three French centers of the DIVAT cohort. Multivariable Cox models estimated the association between pretransplant anti‐angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies and time to acute rejection episodes (ARE) or time to graft failure. Within our cohort, 387 patients (41.2%) had pretransplant AT1R‐Abs higher than 10 U/ml and only 8% (72/970) greater than 17 U/ml. The cumulative probability of clinically relevant (cr)‐ARE was 22.5% at 1 year post‐transplantation [95% CI (19.9–25.4%)]. The cumulative probability of graft failure and patient death were 10.6% [95% CI (8.4–13.3%)] and 5.7% [95% CI (4.0–8.1%)] at 3 years post‐transplantation, respectively. Multivariate Cox models indicated that pretransplant anti‐AT1R antibody levels higher than 10 U/ml were not significantly independently associated with higher risks of acute rejection episodes [HR = 1.04, 95% CI (0.80–1.35)] nor with risk of graft failure [HR = 0.86, 95% CI (0.56–1.33)]. Our study did not confirm an association between pretransplant anti‐AT1R antibody levels and kidney transplant outcomes.     

The time interval between kidney and pancreas transplantation and the clinical outcomes of pancreas after kidney transplantation

Pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation is one of the accepted pancreas transplant modalities. We studied the impact of time interval between kidney and pancreas transplantation on the outcomes of PAK transplantation. Using OPTN/SRTR data, we included 1853 PAK transplants performed between 1996 and 2005 with follow-up until November 1, 2008. Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed using the time interval between kidney and pancreas transplantation either as a categorical (less than one yr, between one and less than three yr, and greater than or equal to three yr) or as a continuous variable (months) to assess kidney graft and patient survival. Patients who received a pancreas transplant three yr or later after kidney transplantation had higher risk of death-censored kidney graft loss (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.04, 2.32, p = 0.03). Each month beyond three yr between kidney and pancreas transplantation incurred 1% higher risk of subsequent death-censored kidney graft loss (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001, 1.02, p = 0.03). In conclusion, time interval between pancreas and kidney transplantation is an independent risk factor of kidney graft loss following pancreas transplantation. Shortening the time interval between pancreas and kidney transplantation to less than three yr may reduce the risk of kidney graft loss in qualified PAK transplant candidates.     

Kidney graft survival in Italy and factors influencing it

PURPOSE: National registry data are often a suitable basis for examination of transplant outcomes. Using data supplied by the Italian National Transplant Registry, established in 1995, we performed the first nationwide analysis of this kind. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 4893 recipients of cadaveric kidneys transplanted in all Italian centers from 1995 through 2000 was done to study 5-year graft survival. The association between some donor and recipient variables and outcomes in renal transplantation was analyzed. Graft survival was 93% at 3 months, 89% at 1 year, 82% at 3 years, and 80% at 5 years after transplantation. RESULTS: A significant association between graft survival and donor age (old vs young, relative risk [RR] = 1.62, 95% CI 1.27-2.06) and recipient age (old vs young, RR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.53). Graft survival was also associated with cold ischemia time (24-36 hours, RR= 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.85 and >36 hours, RR= 1.94, 95% CI 1.32-2.86 vs 0-24 hours) and donor/recipient sex mismatch (female/male vs male/male, RR= 1.50, 95% CI 1.17-1.93). CONCLUSION: The quality of kidney transplantation in Italy is satisfactory and is comparable to that in other developed countries. Furthermore, our experience confirms that both donor and recipient factors are major determinants of renal allograft function.     

En bloc transplantation of kidneys from donors weighing less than 15 kg. into adult recipients

En bloc transplantation of kidneys from donors who weighed less than 15 kg. into 20 adult patients is described. Intraperitonealization of the medial kidney allowed adequate renal positioning and growth. Graft venous thrombosis occurred in 1 patient and irreversible graft rejection occurred in 4 patients. Graft survival was 65% with excellent function at a mean followup of 8.8 months. En bloc transplantation of pediatric cadaver kidney grafts in adults is an acceptable procedure.     

Parental donors in live-donor kidney transplantation associated with increased rejection rates and reduced glomerular filtration rates

BACKGROUND: Living unrelated and related kidney transplantation has been shown to have similar allograft survival. However, the effect of donor-recipient relatedness in living-related and unrelated kidney transplantation on graft and patient survival remains uncertain. METHODS: Using Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, primary living renal transplant recipients in Australia between 1995 and 2004 were studied (n=1989). Donors were categorized according to their relationship with recipients: parent (n=606), child (n=103), spouse (n=358), sibling (n=656), other living-related donors (n=81), and other living-unrelated donors (n=185). Outcomes analyzed included the presence of rejection at 6 months, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 and 3 years, graft survival, and patient survival. RESULTS: A greater proportion of renal transplant recipients from parental and spousal donors were transplanted preemptively. Donor groups had no relationship with graft or patient survival. Parental donors were associated with an increased relative odds of acute rejection (odds ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.53, P=0.009) and a lower eGFR at both 1 and 3 years (coefficient -2.99 and -5.68, respectively; P<0.0001) compared to other donor groups (reference sibling donor group). CONCLUSIONS: This study has established that donor-recipient relatedness in both related and unrelated living kidney transplantation had no significant effect on graft and patient survival. Parental donors were associated with a higher relative risk of rejection and lower eGFR in the transplant recipients, although these findings did not translate to a worse graft outcome.     

Impact of cytomegalovirus prophylaxis on rejection following orthotopic liver transplantation.

With improved cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis, CMV disease after liver transplantation has decreased dramatically, and patient and graft survival have improved. We examined the impact of CMV prophylaxis on biopsy proven rejection after orthotopic liver transplantation by analyzing data on 192 liver recipients over 5 years (1994-1999). Risk factors assessed for biopsy proven rejection including donor and recipient age, CMV serostatus; CMV prophylaxis; immunosuppression; bacteremia and blood product use were examined over a 2-year follow-up. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for rejection showed that bacteremia (HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.39-9.36, P=0.008), donor age (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.06-1.36, per 10 year increase, P=0.004), and use of cyclosporine as initial immunosuppression compared to tacrolimus (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.27-3.09, P=0.003) were associated with increased risk; ganciclovir prophylaxis for 3 months (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.79, P=0.003) and recipient age (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.63-0.96, for each 10 year increase, P=0.03) were associated with decreased risk. We conclude that, the use of CMV prophylaxis with ganciclovir significantly reduces the incidence of biopsy proven rejection in liver transplant recipients.     

Greater early pancreas graft loss in women compared with men after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Gender differences in graft survival has been reported after some types of organ transplantation, but not after pancreas transplantation. This study compares graft survival between women and men after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK). METHODS: All first time SPK (n = 163) transplants (109 M/54 F) performed between 1989 and 2000 at University of Nebraska Medical Center, where data was available, were analyzed for overall graft and patient survival. Graft failure was then subdivided into early (<6 months), and late (>6 months), and compared between women and men. RESULTS: The 5-yr pancreas and kidney graft survival rates for all SPK recipients was 86% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 81-92%] and 87% (95% CI = 82-93%), respectively. While overall pancreas graft survival in women was similar to men (p = 0.16), early pancreas graft failure was greater in women than men (p = 0.010) with no one cause for failure predominant. There was no gender difference in late pancreas graft failure or in early, or late kidney graft failure in the same recipients. The gender difference was unexplained by differences in age, immunosuppression, body mass index (BMI), or diabetes duration between women and men. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of a gender difference in pancreas graft survival after SPK with greater early (<6 months) pancreas graft failure in women than men. With no gender difference in kidney graft failure in the same individuals, gender differences in immune responses are unlikely to be the cause. Multiple variables likely contribute.     

Six-year follow-up of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil use during the first 6 months of renal transplantation

Long-term follow-up examination to test whether therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine (AZA) during the first year translates into different graft or patient survival and graft function is important. Therefore, 6-year follow-up data of a group of 80 consecutive renal transplant recipients were analyzed. The first group of 40 patients was treated with AZA, cyclosporine and prednisone and the second group with MMF, cyclosporine and prednisone for the first 6 months. Graft failure rates were compared during follow-up. Creatinine, inverse slope of creatinine (delta/creatinine) and 24-hour proteinuria at 6 years post transplantation were compared. The Kaplan-Meier analyses for death-censored and non-censored graft failure showed no difference between the groups. Creatinine values at 6 years for the AZA Group were 139 +/- 36 micromol/l (95% CI 125.9-151.2 micromol/l) and for the MMF Group 149 +/- 52 micromol/l (95% CI 133.9-164.9 micromol/l). Delta/creatinine and 24-hour proteinuria at 6 years did not differ between the two groups. We conclude that an initial 6-month treatment with MMF as opposed to AZA reduced the early rejection rate, but did not result in superior long-term graft function or survival after 6 years of follow-up observation.     

ABO‐Incompatible Living Kidney Transplants: Evolution of Outcomes and Immunosuppressive Management

ABO‐incompatible living kidney transplantation (ABO‐ILKT) has steadily become more widespread. However, the optimal immunosuppressive regimen for ABO‐ILKT remains uncertain. We aimed to determine the longitudinal changes in the outcomes from ABO‐ILKT compared with those from ABO‐compatible living kidney transplantation (ABO‐CLKT) over the last 25 years. Of 1195 patients who underwent living kidney transplantations (LKT) at our institute between 1989 and 2013, 1032—including 247 ABO‐ILKT and 785 ABO‐CLKT cases—were evaluated for graft survival, patient survival, infectious adverse events, and renal function. The patients were divided into four groups according to the transplantation era and ABO‐compatibility. In the past decade, ABO‐ILKT and ABO‐CLKT recipients yielded almost equivalent outcomes with respect to the 9‐year graft survival rates, which were 86.9% and 92.0%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–3.22, p = 0.455). The graft survival rate for ABO‐ILKT conducted between 2005 and 2013 was better than that for ABO‐ILKT conducted between 1998 and 2004 (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13–0.72, p = 0.007). ABO‐ILKT recipients showed substantial improvements in the graft survival rate over time. Graft survival was almost identical over the past decade, regardless of ABO‐incompatibility. Currently, ABO‐ILKT is an acceptable treatment for patients with end‐stage renal disease.