Anorectal dysfunction in patients with urologic disturbance due to multiple sclerosis

Anorectal function was evaluated in 11 patients with voiding dysfunction due to multiple sclerosis. In six patients with constipation, three also had symptoms of obstructed defecation and one patient was incontinent due to stercoral diarrhea. One patient was only fecal incontinent and one patient had obstructed defecation as the only symptom. Three patients had no anorectal symptoms. Anal manometry in the women compared with a control group revealed significant lower anal resting and squeeze pressures, although no significant difference of rectal sensation to distention with air was found. Pudendal nerve terminal latencies were obtained in seven patients and were all normal. In four patients latency could not be demonstrated due to poor contraction of the sphincter on stimulation of the pudendal nerve. Two of these patients were incontinent and two had both constipation and obstructed defecation. It is concluded that patients with voiding symptoms due to multiple sclerosis often reveal anorectal symptoms or motility disorders. Although anal sphincter function is reduced, fecal incontinence is not prevalent in this group. The reason for this lies probably in the fact that many of the patients are constipated, thus securing fecal continence.     

Results of rectocele repair

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the results of rectocele repair and parameters that might be useful in selecting patients for this operation. METHODS: Twentyfive patients with symptom-giving rectoceles were prospectively evaluated with a standardized questionnaire, physical examination, defecography, colon transit studies, anorectal manometry, and electrophysiology. Patients underwent posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy. They were followed postoperatively (mean, 1.0 year) with the same questionnaire, physical examination, defecography, anorectal manometry, and electrophysiology. RESULTS: Constipation had improved postoperatively in 21 of 24 constipated patients (88 percent). At postoperative follow-up 13 patients (52 percent) had no constipation symptoms, 8 (32 percent) had occasional symptoms, and 4 (16 percent) had symptoms more than once per week. Four patients with rectocele at preoperative defecography, but not at physical examination, had favorable outcomes following surgery. The majority of patients not using vaginal digitalization preoperatively had improved with respect to constipation. All patients with pathologic transit studies had various degrees of constipation postoperatively. Constipation was not improved in two of five patients with preoperative paradoxic sphincter reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Rectocele is one cause of constipation that can be treated with good results. Preoperative use of vaginal digitalization is not mandatory for a good postoperative result. Defecography is an important complement to physical examination. Patients with pathologic transit study might have a less favorable outcome of rectocele repair with respect to constipation. More studies about the significance of paradoxic sphincter reaction in these patients are indicated.Poster presentation at the XVth Biennial Congress of the International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Singapore, July 2 to 6, 1994.     

Scintigraphic defecography: Quantitative and dynamic assessment of anorectal function

PURPOSE: Conventional assessment of anorectal function with defecating videoproctography is semiquantitative and the high radiation exposure precludes prolonged or repeated testing. The aim of this study was to develop a dynamic scintigraphic method of assessing anorectal function. METHODS: Fourteen patients with fecal incontinence, 18 patients with chronic constipation, and 8 control subjects were assessed by scintigraphic defecography. This involves introduction of a technetium-99mradiolabeled artificial stool into the rectum of the subject and acquisition of gamma camera images during evacuation. RESULTS: Mean evacuation rate was 2.8 percent/ second in incontinent patients and 0.9 percent/second in constipated patients (P <0.001). The mean anorectal angles were 136° and 133°, respectively. There were 18 cases of pelvic floor descent and 6 rectoceles. Scintigraphic defecography provides quantitative information on rectal evacuation. Anorectal angle and pelvic floor movement can be examined. The radiation dose to pelvic organs is significantly less than with videoproctography. CONCLUSION: We believe that scintigraphic defecography is the investigation of choice for objective and dynamic assessment of anorectal function.Read in part at the meeting of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Dublin, Ireland, September 1992.     

Disorders of impaired fecal control a clinical and manometric study

Two hundred eight patients with retention disorders have been studied. Most frequent causes were idiopathic (107), iatrogenic (57), and obstetric (33). Twenty-five patients experienced soiling, 31 had insufficient function, and 152 complained of incontinence. Seventy percent of patients with idiopathic incontinence did not experience urge, compared with 38 percent with iatrogenic and only 3 percent with obstetric incontinence. The incidence of prolapse was 58 percent in patients with idiopathic incontinence, 20 percent in patients with iatrogenic incontinence, and only 3 percent in patients with obstetric incontinence. The authors conclude that the function of the puborectalis sling is to create the anorectal angle to evoke the feeling of urge and to support intra-abdominal contents and, furthermore, that fecal incontinence after anorectal surgery was likely caused by denervation. Anal resting and squeeze pressures varied widely. There was a huge overlap in the different groups. Mean resting and squeeze pressures were 9.5 kPa and 9.4 kPa, respectively, in controls, 4.8 kPa and 10.3 kPa, respectively, in the soiling group, 7.1 and 6.1 kPa, respectively, in the insufficient group, and 5.1 and 2.7 kPa, respectively, in the incontinent group. An incontinent external sphincter function could be defined as a function of the external sphincter causing a pressure increase of 5 kPa or less during straining. The ability to retain feces, therefore, is based on external sphincter function. Anal manometry is, indeed, a suitable technique to determine anal sphincter functions, but the presence of a retention disorder cannot definitely be determined. Its clinical application remains under discussion.     

Lack of correlation of anorectal manometry with symptoms of chronic childhood constipation and encopresis

Chronic constipation is an extremely common problem in children. Many authors have advocated using anorectal manometric examination during evaluation of chronic childhood constipation and encopresis as a means of developing individualized modes of treatment. PURPOSE: This study was designed to prospectively examine frequency and severity of symptoms of childhood constipation and encopresis and associate these symptoms with anorectal manometric findings. METHODS: Forty-four children with chronic constipation participated in the study. Before performing anorectal manometry, bowel-related symptoms were collected for two consecutive weeks with a computerized voice mail system. Anorectal manometry was performed using a triple lumen catheter attached to a hydraulic manometry infusion system. RESULTS: Frequency of voluntary bowel movements did not correlate with any manometric parameters. Frequency of fecal soiling, age at onset of symptoms, and duration of symptoms were all highly correlated with degree of sphincter spasm during attempted defecation; however, none of these variables correlated with any other manometric parameter. Amount of pain associated with bowel movements correlated with frequency of soiling and was inversely correlated with maximum squeeze pressure but was not correlated with any other manometric parameter. CONCLUSIONS: In children with chronic constipation and encopresis, sphincter spasm demonstrated with anorectal manometry is highly correlated with frequency of fecal soiling, age at onset, and duration of symptoms; however, none of the other commonly measured manometric parameters appear to correlate with symptoms of chronic childhood constipation and encopresis.Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant RO1 HD 28160.     

Defecography in patients with anorectal disorders

To evaluate the results and clinical impact of defecography in patients with anorectal disorders, 100 results of defecographic examinations from 92 patients were reviewed. The defecographic results were screened for the anorectal angle, defined both at rest and during straining, perineal descent, and abnormalities of the rectal configuration during straining. Anal manometry, saline infusion test, rectal capacity measurement, and anal electromyography (EMG) were also performed. There was a significant difference (P<0.001) both at rest (22°) and during straining (12°) between the two anorectal angle measurements. Incontinent patients had a larger anorectal angle, both at rest and during straining, than continent patients (P<0.04), but with a large overlap. The anorectal angle was not influenced by gender or age. An abnormal rectal configuration was found in 62 defecographic examinations. From the 8 patients with rectopexy performed for a large rectocele or intussusception, incontinent patients with an intussusception had the best results. In four patients, anal EMG showed an increased activity of the external sphincter during straining. Two of these four patients had abnormal defecograhic results. No correlations were found between anorectal angle and the other function tests. In conclusion, the anorectal angle lacks clinical relevance. In patients with defecation problems, defecography may be indicated whenever other investigations (physical examination, anal manometry, anal EMG) have excluded local pathology or a spastic pelvic floor syndrome. In these situations, defecography could detect an intussusception, which could easily be treated with rectopexy.Read in part at the meeting of the Dutch Society of Gastroenterology, Noordwijkerhout (The Netherlands), March 25 to 26, 1988.     

Anorectal dysfunction and rectal prolapse in progressive systemic sclerosis

Our aim was to characterize the clinical spectrum of anorectal dysfunction among eight patients with progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) who presented with altered bowel movements with or without fecal incontinence. The anorectum was assessed by physical examination, proctosigmoidoscopy, and anorectal manometry. There was concomitant involvement of the other regions of the digestive tract in all patients as determined by barium studies, endoscopy, or manometry: eight esophageal, three gastric, four small bowel, and two colonic. Seven patients had fecal incontinence, and four also had second-degree complete rectal prolapse. Abnormal anorectal function, particularly abnormal anal sphincter resting pressures, were detected in all patients; anal sphincter pressures were lower in those with rectal prolapse. Rectal capacity and wall compliance were impaired in seven of seven patients. Successful surgical correction of prolapse in three patients resulted in restoration of incontinence for six months and seven years in two of the three patients. We conclude that rectal dysfunction and weakness of the anal sphincters are important factors contributing, respectively, to altered bowel movements and fecal incontinence in patients with gastrointestinal involvement by PSS. Rectal prolapse worsens anal sphincter dysfunction and should be sought routinely as it is a treatable factor aggravating fecal incontinence in patients with PSS.This work was presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association, May 1992, and appears in abstract form in Gastroenterology 1992;102:A473.Supported in part by the General Clinical Research Center Grant 00585 from the National Institutes of Health.     

Association between rectocele and paradoxical sphincter response

Rectocele as well as paradoxical sphincter reaction may lead to rectal emptying difficulties and outlet obstruction. Forty-one patients with emptying disturbances and rectocele were investigated with defecography, anorectal manometry, colon transit time, and electromyography. Twenty-nine patients (71 percent) had concomitant paradoxical sphincter reaction, and 13 of these also had increased colon transit time. The functional results after surgical treatment of rectocele are not always satisfactory, probably because patients often have several causes for their emptying disturbances. It is emphasized that careful preoperative investigations are important before surgical treatment of rectocele in patients with emptying difficulties.Presented in part at the World Congress of Gastroenterology, Sydney, 1990 and the European Congress of Clinical Neurophysiology, Paris, 1990.     

Balloon expulsion test facilitates diagnosis of pelvic floor outlet obstruction due to nonrelaxing puborectalis muscle

We compared balloon expulsion, defecography, colonic transit times, anal manometry, and electromyography in 21 patients with severe constipation. Defecography demonstrated nonrelaxation of the sphincter during straining in all patients. Only 12 patients were unable to expel a balloon. Colonic transit was normal (five) or showed rectosigmoid delay (seven). All 12 patients were offered biofeedback. The nine patients able to expel a balloon had normal colonic transit (six) or colonic inertia (two). Rectosigmoid delay was due to severe intussusception in one patient. Anal manometry and pudendal nerve latencies revealed no difference between those who could and those who could not expel a balloon. Balloon expulsion seems to be a more reliable way to diagnose pelvic floor outlet obstruction due to nonrelaxation of the puborectalis muscle. Nonrelaxation of the sphincter on defecography should be correlated with balloon expulsion and colonic transit studies.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, April 29 to May 4, 1990.     

Role of manometry, defecography and anal endosonography in the evaluation of colorectal disorders.

OBJECTIVE: altered motility or anatomy of the rectum, anus and perineal floor may lead to symptoms which are unresponsive to routine therapeutic approaches. These disturbances usually lead to constipation, fecal incontinence, or both. Different tests and techniques for evaluating anorectal and perineal disorders, developed in the last two decades, make a better understanding of these disorders possible. This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic benefits of combining manometry, defecography and anal endosonography in the assessment of patients with anorectal disorders. METHODS: twenty-five children with constipation (with or without soiling), incontinence and/or prolapse underwent anal manometry, defecography and anal endosonography. Group A consisted of 9 children with fecal incontinence, group B consisted of 10 children with constipation with soiling, and group C comprised 6 children with constipation without soiling. RESULTS: in group A resting incontinence was associated with a hypotonic external sphincter in 4 out of 9 patients, 2 of whom had internal anal sphincter thinning. In group B resting incontinence was associated with a hypotonic external sphincter in 8 out of 10 patients, 6 of whom had internal anal sphincter thinning. In group C these associations were not seen in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: barium enema is not sufficient for an accurate diagnosis of anorectal disorders. No single test is capable of revealing the type of disease. Anal manometry, defecography and endosonography are complementary procedures in the assessment of this group of disorders. This new approach will improve our knowledge of the pathogenesis of these disorders in children. However, further studies are needed to obtain conclusive evidence.     

Are pelvic floor movements abnormal in disordered defecation?

Pelvic floor movements were assessed by videoproctography in 126 subjects: neuropathic fecal incontinence patients (n=44), chronic constipation patients (n =52), and controls (n=30). A significantly lower pelvic floor position at rest and a more obtuse anorectal angle were found in incontinent patients than in controls (P <0.01). constipated patients showed no significant difference from controls at rest. There was less pelvic floor movement during contraction in incontinent patients than in controls, indicating a flaccid, noncontractile pelvic floor in neuropathic incontinence. Movement during contraction in constipated subjects was also less than in controls. Changes in the pelvic floor position during straining were the same as in controls. These data indicate that the pelvic floor is flaccid and noncontractile in neuropathic fecal incontinence, which supports the concept of a progressive neuropathy involving the sacral outflow. Similar changes are not seen at rest in patients with constipation even though they have a long history of straining.     

Slow transit of the colon associated with severe constipation after the ripstein operation

Eighteen patients with severe constipation after undergoing the Ripstein operation for rectal prolapse (n = 11) or internal rectal procidentia (n = 7) were studied with defecography, anorectal manometry, electromyography of the external anal sphincter and the puborectalis muscle, colonic transit time, and blood tests. Thirteen patients had slow-transit constipation. None showed a completely normal pattern in the parameters studied. The authors emphasize the importance of careful preoperative investigation to identify the patients who have associated colorectal disturbances together with their rectal prolapse or internal rectal procidentia.Read in part at Collegium Internationale Chirurgiae Digestivae Tenth Congress, Copenhagen 1988.     

Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery

PURPOSE: Anorectal surgery can lead to fecal soiling and incontinence. Whether surgery changes the anatomy and causes symptoms is unknown. Anatomic changes can be visualized by anal endosonography. METHODS: We studied 50 patients after hemorrhoidectomy (24), fistulectomy (18), and internal sphincterotomy (8). Symptoms were assessed, and anal endosonography, anal manometry, mucosal electrosensitivity, and neurophysiologic tests were performed. RESULTS: In 23 (46 percent) patients, a defect of the anal sphincter was found (13 patients had an internal sphincter defect, 1 had an external sphincter defect, and 9 had a combined sphincter defect), 3 after hemorrhoidectomy, 13 after fistulectomy, and 7 after internal sphincterotomy. Seven patients had symptoms, and they all had a sphincter defect. In the other 16 of 23 patients (70 percent), the sphincter defect did not produce symptoms. An internal sphincter defect lowered maximum basal pressure and shortened sphincter length. CONCLUSION: Anal endosonography can reveal sphincter defects after anorectal surgery. Seventy percent of the patients in this group had no complaints; therefore, defects were unsuspected. This has clinical implications in the evaluation of patients with fecal incontinence.Read in part at the meeting of The British Society for Gastroenterology, Warwick, United Kingdom, September 15 to 17, 1993.     

Patterns of male fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: This study sought to identify clinical and manometric characteristics of male fecal incontinence. METHOD: Clinical charts of 25 men with a chief complaint of fecal incontinence were retrospectively reviewed. Their anorectal physiology test results were compared with those from a group of 20 healthy men. RESULTS: Fourteen men (56 percent) were leakers, who complained of loss of liquid or solid stool smears that stained their underclothes. Eleven men (44 percent) had true incontinence, with loss of control over gas, liquid, and/or solid stool. Leakers had lower anal sphincter pressures than normal men (P <0.05) but higher pressures than incontinent men (P <0.05). In leakers the anal sphincter length at rest was longer than in incontinent (P <0.01) and normal men (P <0.05). All incontinent men had decreased manometric pressures, abnormal anorectal sensation or prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies, whereas only one-half of the leakers had physiologic abnormalities. Treatment using dietary manipulation, constipating agents or cleansing enemas was successful in nearly 90 percent of incontinent men but only 55 percent of the leakers. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas true incontinence in men is caused by a short, low pressure sphincter with altered sensation or innervation, leakage is associated with a long, intermediate pressure sphincter that frequently has normal sensation and innervation. This long, intermediate pressure sphincter may predispose these men to leakage. Treatment of leakers is less successful than treatment of incontinent men. Leakers and incontinent men have unique clinical and physiologic profiles that should be identified to help guide treatment and determine prognosis.Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, May 2 to 7, 1993, and at the Tripartite Meeting, Sydney, Australia, October 17 to 20, 1993.     

Anal endosonography and manometry

PURPOSE: Correlations between anal sphincter function as assessed by anorectal manometry and anal sphincter anatomy measured by endoluminal ultrasound have been reported in the literature both for patients and for healthy individuals but have not been confirmed by other authors. METHODS: For a larger series of patients (152 consecutive patients, mean age 54.1±15.5 years; female:male ratio, 11141) with anorectal dysfunctions such as incontinence (n=92), constipation (n=37), and other symptoms (n=23), diagnostic work-up included conventional multilumen anorectal manometry to evaluate internal sphincter pressure at rest, maximum external sphincter squeeze pressure during contraction, and endoanal sonography to determine anal sphincter integrity and to measure dorsal, left lateral, and right lateral diameter of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and external anal sphincter (EAS) muscles. RESULTS: Maximum squeeze pressure was significantly correlated to muscle thickness of the EAS(P =0.001). No association was found between resting pressure and IAS diameter. Women had significantly lower resting and squeeze pressures than men(P =0.008 and P =0.003, respectively), but age-related changes of function were only found for resting pressure. Endosonographic values of IAS and EAS did not differ between genders but were significantly correlated with age(P =0.008 and P =0.02, respectively). Because all correlations were rather weak, they only can explain a small portion of data variance. CONCLUSION: Anal manometry and anal ultrasound, therefore, are of complementary value and are both indicated in adequate clinical problems.Supported by a grant from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, En 50/10, Bonn, Germany.     

Selection of constipated patients as subtotal colectomy candidates.

We evaluated 224 consecutive patients referred for severe constipation prospectively by strict criteria to determine their candidacy for subtotal colectomy. Eighteen patients had insufficient symptoms to warrant evaluation. Two hundred six patients had anorectal manometry and defecography, and 182 had colonic transit measurement. Forty-nine patients had normal or minimally abnormal studies. One-hundred twenty-nine patients had abnormalities such as outlet obstruction, mild colonic inertia, diffuse gut dysfunction, or combinations of factors not favoring subtotal colectomy. Twenty-eight patients had colonic inertia without outlet obstruction and with disabling symptoms; 19 of these patients underwent subtotal colectomy. Follow-up > or = 12 months was available in 14 patients from this group. Of these patients, 12 (86%) were clinically improved. Preoperative evaluation accurately predicted postoperative fecal incontinence and likely reduced postoperative constipation. Small-bowel obstruction occurred postoperatively in 4 patients (29%), and remains a major risk of subtotal colectomy even in carefully selected candidates.     

Long-term efficacy of biofeedback training for fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: Biofeedback therapy in fecal incontinence has been reported to improve continence in more than 70 percent of patients, but most studies have followed patients for less than two years. METHODS: Patients treated by biofeedback training between 1985 and 1986 were given a questionnaire in 1991, as were incontinent patients who had not entered this treatment program. All were asked for the occurrence, frequency, and severity of incontinence events in the past two weeks. Anamnestic and anorectal manometry data from the initial visit were also compared. RESULTS: Eighteen of 24 treated patients and 40 of 71 untreated patients responded. Of those treated by biofeed-back, 78 percent reported episodes of fecal incontinence as compared with 77.5 percent of those not treated by biofeedback. Severity of incontinence, however, was significantly less (P <0.02) in the treatment group (mean number of events, 0.2/day) than in those without treatment (1/day). In biofeedback-treated patients, it was identical with the frequency and severity reported immediately after therapy. No differences were found with respect to initial clinical data and anorectal manometry between both groups. CONCLUSION: Biofeedback training improves continence in patients not only during treatment and within the first two years but also for several years after therapy.Supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, En 50/10.Presented in part at the European Gastrointestinal Motility Symposium, Barcelona, Spain, November 19 to 21, 1992. Published abstract form in the Journal of Gastrointestinal Motility 1992;4:218.     

Recovery of anal sphincter function following transabdominal repair of rectal prolapse: Cause of improved continence?

Twenty-eight patients with complete rectal prolapse underwent anorectal manometry before and 6 months and 1–2 years after abdominal rectopexy and sigmoid resection in a study of the mechanisms responsible for postoperatively improved anal continence. Preoperatively, 22 patients reported defective anal control. Seven patients (all with minor incontinence) regained normal control and eight other patients achieved improved continence after surgery. Anal resting, squeeze, and voluntary contraction pressures were significantly lower for defective than for normal control, with a significant rise in these pressures at 6 months after the operation, except for those incontinent patients in whom continence was not improved. No further pressure rise was seen later. Improvement of continence was not accompanied by changes in rectal sensation or reflexive functions of the internal anal sphincter. These results suggest that recovery of the resting and voluntary contraction functions of the sphincter muscles was the cause of continence improvement observed after surgery. Anal manometry was unable to predict outcome of function. Therefore, supplementary procedures for restoration of continence are not advisable, although patients with only minor incontinence are likely to regain full continence after rectopexy alone.     

Evidence of electromechanical dissociation of the internal anal sphincter in idiopathic fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the relationship between internal sphincter electromyographic frequency and ambulatory anal pressures in order to clarify the pathophysiology of internal anal sphincter dysfunction in fecal incontinence. METHODS: Seventytwo patients of median age 55 years (range, 24–75; 63 females) with neurogenic fecal incontinence and 33 normal subjects of median age 48.5 years (range, 25–74; 21 females) underwent fine-wire anal sphincter electromyography and anal manometry. RESULTS: The median internal anal sphincter electromyographic frequency was incontinent 0.25 Hz (0.2–0.34) and the control was 0.44 Hz (0.36–0.55;P<0.03). Ambulatory resting pressures were incontinent median 54 cm of H ₂ O (34–68 cm of H ₂ O) and control 94 cm of H ₂ O (72–102;P<0.01). Internal sphincter electromyographic frequency correlated with anal resting pressures in both groups (P<0.002). Internal sphincter electromyographic silence not attributable to electrode movement or the rectoanal inhibitory reflex, lasting 0.5 to 4 minutes occurred in all but two of the incontinent patients. The anal pressure during this period did not significantly change (P>0.1). No recruitment of the external sphincter or puborectalis was noted during these episodes. Such electromechanical dissociation was not seen in the control group. The frequency of transient internal sphincter relaxation was 4 (ranges 2–6) per hour in controls and 8 (ranges, 6–12) per hour in incontinent patients (P<0.01). Rectal pressures did not exceed midanal pressures in any of the controls but did in all of the incontinent patients on at least one occasion per hour in the incontinent group. CONCLUSION: Internal anal sphincter activity exhibits electromechanical dissociation and relaxes abnormally in incontinent patients.Supported by a separate equipment grant from the Scottish Hospital Endowment Research Trust.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Francisco, California, June 7 to 12, 1992.     

Anal endosonography: Relationship with anal manometry and neurophysiologic tests

Thirty-seven patients were referred for evaluation of anal function; their clinical diagnoses were traumatic fecal incontinence (13), idiopathic (pudendal neuropathy) fecal incontinence (7), fecal soiling (9), and other (8). In all patients, anal endosonography (sphincter defects and internal sphincter thickness [IST]) and anal manometry (maximal basal pressure [MBP] and maximal squeeze pressure [MSP]) were performed. In 18 patients, neurophysiologic tests (EMG-maximal contraction pattern [MCP], single-fiber EMG [fiber density; FD], and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency [PNTML]) were also performed. Endosonography demonstrated in seven patients both an internal and external sphincter defect (Group 1), in seven patients an internal sphincter defect and in one patient an external sphincter defect (Group 2), and in 22 patients no sphincter defect (Group 3). There was a significant difference among these three groups for MBP and MCP, the lowest being in Group 1. Between the patients with traumatic fecal incontinence and idiopathic fecal incontinence, no differences in IST, MBP, MSP, MCP, FD, and PNTML were found. In two patients with a suspected obstetric trauma, there was an unexpected additional severe pudendal neuropathy. In one patient with a suspected obstetric trauma, no damage of the anal sphincters could be demonstrated. In one patient with suspected idiopathic fecal incontinence, there was an additional, unsuspected defect of the internal sphincter. There was concordance between endosonography and EMG in the mapping of the external sphincter. Clinical diagnoses can be misleading in differentiating between traumatic and idiopathic fecal incontinence; anal endosonography provides unsuspected and additional information about the sphincters; PNTML can reveal unsuspected neuropathy in traumatic fecal incontinence. Therefore, the combination of endosonography and PNTML is promising in selecting patients for surgery.