National Survey of Emergency Medicine Resident Moonlighting

OBJECTIVES: To survey emergency medicine (EM) residents regarding moonlighting practices and perceptions for clarifying: 1) resident moonlighting remuneration; 2) any association of perceived educational debt with moonlighting income and hours; and 3) perceptions related to moonlighting (including motivations, impact on resident training, and potential medicolegal difficulties). METHODS: A confidential, voluntary survey was administered to all allopathic EM residents in the United States. This written survey was provided to residents at their in-service examinations. Completed forms were anonymously returned by residents or local administrative staff to a central site where all identifiers were removed prior to mailing en mass to the investigators. Comparisons between groups were made using chi-square tests and correlations were assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Seventy-six percent (1,826/2,407) of the surveys were returned. There was a weak correlation (r = 0.11) between educational debt and moonlighting hours for residents in the second year and above, but no association of debt with moonlighting income. Most (88%) of the residents reported that their programs permitted moonlighting. Nearly half (49%) reported that they did moonlight in some way. Most (82%) thought moonlighting provided experience not available in the residency. Only 13 (2%) respondents stated they had been sued for malpractice while moonlighting. Most (66%) moonlighting respondents stated that they moonlighted for financial reasons, with educational debt the primary motivating factor. Of the moonlighting residents, 28% were unsure of their type of malpractice insurance coverage, and 9% had no coverage at all. CONCLUSIONS: Education about EM practice matters including the risks of moonlighting should begin early in residency, because moonlighting is widespread. Residents are vulnerable to medicolegal action while moonlighting and have insufficient knowledge of their malpractice insurance coverage. Although educational debt is perceived as a strong motivating factor for moonlighting, there is only a weak relationship between educational debt and moonlighting hours.     

Resident Service Hours in Emergency Medicine

Objective: The number of hours worked by residents in all specialties has become a controversial issue. Residents often are expected to competently conduct patient care activities and to take educational advantage of clinical experiences in spite of frequent fatigue and sleep deprivation. This survey of residency directors was designed to assess the scheduled clinical time for emergency medicine (EM) residents. Methods: A 13-question survey dealing with time commitments of EM residents was sent to the residency directors of all accredited EM residency programs in the United States in the fall of 1991. Residency directors were asked to indicate the number of shifts, hours, and days off per week; and the number of night shifts and weekend days off per month for each postgraduate year of residency training (PGY1-PGY4). Directors also were asked whether shifts were scheduled randomly or predictably with progression from days to nights with time off after nights. Results: Seventy of 71 (98.6% response rate) residency directors responded. Residents were scheduled for an average of 49.1 hours per week. Scheduled hours decreased from an average of 51.9 at the PGY1 level to an average of 44.5 at the PGY4 level. A similar progression with year of training was noted for scheduled night shifts/ month, days off/week, and weekend days off/month. A PGY1 trainee averaged 7.0 night shifts/month, 1.9 days off/week, and 3.0 weekend days off/month; while a PGY4 trainee averaged 5.3, 2.4, and 3.2, respectively. Only 40% of the directors reported predictable scheduling progressing from days to nights. Conclusion: Emergency medicine resident schedules, as reported by residency directors, fall well within current specialty-specific requirements and compare favorably with the reported numbers for other specialties. However, because large ranges in scheduling parameters were reported, the data may be of value to residency directors, residents, and prospective residents. Most programs did not report a predictable schedule progression of shifts.     

Effect of Changes in Graduate Medical Education Funding on Emergency Medicine Residency Programs

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether changes in graduate medical education (GME) funding have had an impact on emergency medicine (EM) residency training programs. METHODS: A 34-question survey was mailed to the program directors (PDs) of all 115 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited EM residency programs in the United States in the fall of 1998, requesting information concerning the impact of changes in GME funding on various aspects of the EM training. The results were then compared with a similar unpublished survey conducted in the fall of 1996. RESULTS: One hundred one completed surveys were returned (88% response rate). Seventy-one (70%) of the responding EM residency programs were PGY-I through PGY-III, compared with 55 (61%) of the responding programs in 1996. The number of PGY-II through PGY-IV programs decreased from 25 (28%) of responding programs in 1996 to 17 (16%). The number of PGY-I through PGY-IV programs increased slightly (13 vs 10); the number of EM residency positions remained relatively stable. Fifteen programs projected an increase in their number of training positions in the next two years, while only three predicted a decrease. Of the respondents, 56 programs reported reductions in non-EM residency positions and 35 programs reported elimination of fellowship positions at their institutions. Only four of these were EM fellowships. Forty-six respondents reported a reduction in the number of non-EM residents rotating through their EDs, and of these, 11 programs reported this had a moderate to significant effect on their ability to adequately staff the ED with resident physicians. Sixteen programs limited resident recruitment to only those eligible for the full three years of GME funding. Eighty-seven EM programs reported no change in faculty size due to funding issues. Sixty-two programs reported no change in the total number of hours of faculty coverage in the ED, while 34 programs reported an increase. Three EM programs reported recommendations being made to close their residency programs in the near future. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in GME funding have not caused a decrease in the number of existing EM residency and fellowship training positions, but may have had an impact in other areas, including: an increase in the number of EM programs structured in a PGY-I through PGY-III format (with a corresponding decrease in the number of PGY-II through PGY-IV programs); a decrease in the number of non-EM residents rotating through the ED; restriction of resident applicants who are ineligible for full GME funding from consideration by some EM training programs; and an increase in the total number of faculty clinical hours without an increase in faculty size.     

Global Health Education in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs

Background

Interest in global health and international electives is growing among Emergency Medicine (EM) residents in the United States (US). The majority of EM residency programs offer opportunities for international electives. The degree of participation among residents and type of support provided by the residency program, however, remains unclear.

Study Objectives

To explore the current state of global health education among EM residents who participate in international electives.

Methods

A 12-question survey was e-mailed to the program directors of the 192 EM residency programs in the US. The survey included questions about the number of residents participating in international electives and the types of preparation, project requirements, supervision, and feedback participating residents receive.

Results

The response rate was 53% with 102 responses. Seventy-five of 102 (74%) programs reported that at least one resident participated in an international elective in the 2010–2011 academic year. Forty-three programs (42%) report no available funding to support any resident on an international elective. Residents receive no preparation for international work in 41 programs (40%). Only 25 programs (26%) required their residents to conduct a project while abroad. Forty-nine programs (48%) reported no formal debriefing session, and no formal feedback was collected from returning residents in 57 of 102 (59%) programs.

Conclusion

The majority of EM residencies have residents participating in international electives. However, the programs report variable preparation, requirements, and resident supervision. These results suggest a need for an expanded and more structured approach to international electives undertaken by EM residents.     

Predictive Value of Letters of Recommendation vs Questionnaires for Emergency Medicine Resident Performance

Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of standard letters of recommendation (LORs) vs preprinted questionnaires (PPQs) for resident performance at one emergency medicine (EM) residency program.
Methods: A retrospective association of LORs and PPQs with intraining resident performance ratings was done at one EM residency program. The residency application files of EM residents who completed the program were reviewed to locate files that had LORs and PPQs written by the same author. Seventeen resident files contained 32 LOR/PPQ pairs. These LORs and PPQs were submitted in a blinded fashion to 3 outside EM residency directors. Each LOR and PPQ was evaluated for the applicant's suitability for the speciality of EM, medical knowledge, procedural skills, interpersonal skills, motivation, and overall rank. The scores given by the outside reviewers were compared with resident performance ratings determined by 5 EM attending physicians who evaluated the residents along the same 6 dimensional ratings.
Results: Statistically, no differences were found between the LORs and PPQs in predicting resident performance.
Conclusions: PPQs may substitute for LORs in the evaluation of resident applicants.     

Residents with disabilities: a national survey of directors of emergency medicine residency programs

BACKGROUND: The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) has been in effect since 1990. The present study shows response to this act for emergency medicine (EM) residents nationwide. METHODS: A total of 121 surveys were mailed to the directors of American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-approved residency programs. A definition of disability was provided, and a second mailing was sent to those not replying. RESULTS: Ninety-two program directors (76%) responded, representing 4,644 residents. Of these, 62 residents (1.3%) were reported as having a documented disability. Programs with a known disabled resident were significantly more likely to have available resources for assistance. Forty-seven (52%) of the program directors suspected a resident might have an undiagnosed disability, and 40 (85%) of these recommended testing or referral. CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide array of disabilities among EM residents. Available assistance varies. This may apply to other residencies as well.     

Emergency Medicine Residency Applicant Educational Debt Relationship with Attitude toward Training and Moonlighting

OBJECTIVES: Heated debate persists regarding the role of resident moonlighting in emergency medicine (EM). The attitudes of EM residency applicants have not been assessed. The objectives of this study were to assess: 1) the level of educational debt among EM residency applicants, 2) their perception of increased risk potential to patients from unsupervised EM resident practice, and 3) their opposition to laws restricting moonlighting. The authors then report the relationship between the degree of indebtedness and these stated positions. METHODS: Fifty-four EM residency programs returned 393 responses to a 1996 anonymous survey. Applicants recorded: 1) their indebtedness, 2) whether they believed that EDs should hire only physicians who have completed full training in an EM residency, and 3) whether they believed that unsupervised EM practice prior to completing EM training carries a higher risk of adverse patient outcomes. The authors used a t-test and logistic regression to determine whether there was any significant difference in debt between responders who answered yes and those who answered no to the various questions. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD debt was $72,290 +/- 48,683 (median $70,000). Most EM applicants (84.8%) agreed that unsupervised medical care by EM residents carries a higher risk of adverse patient outcomes. Paradoxically, only half the applicants opposed a moonlighting ban. Responses did not statistically correlate with educational debt. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency medicine residency applicant debt is large. The EM applicants' opposition to laws that would restrict moonlighting was mixed. This was inconsistent with the majority acknowledging an increased risk potential to patients. Nearly all EM applicants would still select EM as a career, even if moonlighting were to be banned.     

Report from the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors Subcommittee on Graduate Medical Education Funding: Effects of Decreased Medicare Support

INTRODUCTION: Recent changes by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) have resulted in decreased Medicare support for emergency medicine (EM) residencies. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of reduced graduate medical education (GME) funding support on residency size, resident rotations, and support for a fourth postgraduate year (PGY) of training and for residents with previous training. METHODS: A 36-question survey was developed by the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) committee on GME funding and sent to all 122 EM program directors (PDs). Responses were collected by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) office and blinded with respect to the institution. RESULTS: Of 122 programs, 109 (89%) responded, of which 78 were PGY 1-3 programs, 19 were PGY 2-4, and 12 were PGY 1-4. The PDs were asked specifically whether there were changes in program size due to changes in Medicare reimbursement. Although few programs (12%) decreased their size or planned to decrease their size, 39% had discussions regarding decreasing their size. Thirty percent of the PDs responded that other programs at their institution had already decreased their size; 26% of the PDs had problems with financing outside rotations; and 24% had a decrease in off-service residents in their emergency departments (EDs). Only seven (6%) of programs paid residents from practice plan dollars, while most (82%) were fully supported by federal GME funding. Nearly all four-year programs (97%) received full resident salary support from their institutions and 77% of programs accept residents with previous training. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all EM programs are fully supported by their institutions, including the fourth postgraduate year. Most programs take residents with previous training. Although few programs have reduced their size, many are discussing this. Many programs have had difficulty with funding off-service rotations and many have had decreased numbers of off-service residents in their EDs. Recent GME funding changes have had adverse effects on EM residency programs.     

General Competencies Are Intrinsic to Emergency Medicine Training: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVES: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has promulgated six areas called General Competencies (GCs) that residency programs are required to evaluate. The authors sought to determine if these domains were an intrinsic part of emergency medicine (EM) residency training by using a global assessment evaluation device. METHODS: This was an observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study that compared GC acquisition between first-, second-, and third-year (EM1, EM2, and EM3) residents. Five postgraduate year (PGY) 1 to PGY 3 allopathic EM programs in Michigan participated. A global assessment form using a 1 through 9 ordinal scale with 86 scoring items was given to program directors for each resident in their programs. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the means between EM1, EM2, and EM3 scores. RESULTS: Five EM programs evaluated 150 residents. The GC scores were as follows: Patient Care: EM1 4.92, EM2 5.79, and EM3 6.40; Medical Knowledge: EM1 4.90, EM2 5.80, and EM3 6.46; Practice-based Learning and Improvement: EM1 4.60, EM2 5.48, and EM3 6.16; Interpersonal and Communication Skills: EM1 4.99, EM2 5.39, and EM3 6.01; Professionalism: EM1 5.43, EM2 5.68, and EM3 6.27; Systems-based Practice: EM1 4.80, EM2 5.48, and EM3 6.21. ANOVA showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) for all GCs. CONCLUSIONS: EM residents from several residency programs showed statistically significant progressive acquisition of the ACGME GCs using a global assessment device. This suggests that the GCs may be an intrinsic component in the training of EM residents.     

Availability and Potential Impact of International Rotations in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs

Background

Interest in international emergency medicine (IEM) is growing. With the globalization of medicine, IEM as a field has expanded from disaster relief efforts to opportunities for resident education. Numerous accounts have been published voicing the educational benefits of international rotations (IRs). As such, many residencies now offer opportunity for IRs.

Objective

To evaluate the availability and utilization of IRs in emergency medicine (EM) residency programs.

Methods

EM residency program directors were surveyed from the 126 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited programs with ≥2 years of residency graduates. Directors were asked about availability of IR, categorized as: 1) required; 2) elective (with or without pre-designated sites); or 3) not available.

Results

One hundred eleven (88%) program directors reported data on 2240 graduates over 2 years. IRs were offered by 101 (91%) programs. No program required an IR. Among programs offering IRs, most (69%) did not have pre-designated sites. Eighty-nine of 101 programs (88%) allowing IRs had at least one resident completing an IR; 23 of 111 programs (21%) had more than 30% resident participation in IRs. Programs offering IRs at pre-designated sites had 210 of 727 (29%) residents complete an IR, compared to 272 of 1469 (19%) in programs without pre-designated sites (p < 0.001). Four-year programs had twice as many IR participants (32%) compared to 3-year programs (17%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

More residents participated in IRs when a pre-designated site was available compared to programs without. This suggests that programs interested in supporting IRs consider developing pre-designated sites to accommodate residents.     

Survey of moonlighting practices and work requirements of emergency medicine residents

We conducted an anonymous moonlighting and academic practice survey of all emergency medicine residents enrolled in accredited programs during 1997. Expanding on previous work, this survey included specific details and practice trends of moonlighting emergency medicine residents and for comparison also included academic work requirements. The typical emergency residency program requires residents to work 204 hours monthly. However, the range of required work-hours is strikingly large (120-300). Half of emergency medicine residents moonlight. The typical moonlighting resident works as a solo emergency department practitioner in multiple facilities outside of residency-affiliated institutions. Moonlighting salaries generally double a resident's annual income and are used to pay off student loans and other debt. Residents with higher student debt are more likely to moonlight. Despite the fact that most residency programs restrict moonlighting, a majority of moonlighting residents have violated an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education prohibition restricting work within one period of a regular residency-scheduled shift. Half of all residents surveyed, whether involved in moonlighting practice or not, would violate a ban on the practice. Residents universally felt that moonlighting enhanced residency performance and was a positive educational experience. Use of these data may aid in the development of formal guidelines regarding emergency medicine moonlighting practice.     

Injuries to emergency medicine residents on ems rotations

Objectives. To study the incidence and nature of injuries sustained by emergency medicine (EM) residents during EMS rotations, and steps taken at EM residency programs to increase resident safety during field activities. Methods. An eight-question survey form was mailed to all 114 U.S. EM residency directors, with a second mailing to nonresponders eight weeks after the initial mailing. Results. A total of 105 surveys were returned (92%). Six surveys were from new programs whose residents have not yet rotated on EMS. These were excluded from further analysis, leaving 99 programs. Of these, 91 (92%) reported no injuries. One EM resident died in a helicopter crash in 1985. Seven other injury events were reported: 1) facial lacerations, rib fractures, and a shoulder injury in an ambulance accident; 2) an open finger fracture (crushed by a backboard); 3) contusions and a concussion when an ambulance was struck by a fire engine; 4) a groin pull sustained while entering a helicopter; 5) bilateral metatarsal fractures in a fall; 6) rib fractures, a pneumothorax, and a concussion in an ambulance accident; and 7) “minor injuries” sustained in a crash while responding to a scene in a program-owned response vehicle. Actions taken at residency programs to reduce the risk of injury include the use of ballistic vests (four programs), requiring helmets on flights (five programs), and changing flight experience from mandatory to optional (two programs). Ten programs (10%) reported using ground scene safety lectures, and nine programs (15% of those offering flights) reported various types of flight safety instruction. Sixty-nine programs (70%) reported no formal field safety training or other active steps to increase resident safety on EMS rotations. Conclusions. Injuries sustained by EM residents during EMS rotations are uncommon but nontrivial, with several serious injuries and one fatality reported. The majority of EM residency programs have no formal safety training programs for EMS rotations.     

Graduate Medical Education Downsizing: Perceived Effects of Participating in the HCFA Demonstration Project in New York State

OBJECTIVE: Financial support for graduate medical education (GME) is shrinking nationally as Medicare cuts GME funds. Thirty-nine hospitals in New York State (NYS) voluntarily participated in a Health Care Financing Administration demonstration project (HCFADP)-the goal of which was to reduce total residency training positions by 4-5%/year over a five-year period, while increasing primary care positions. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of downsizing on emergency department (ED) staffing and emergency medicine (EM) residency training. METHODS: Structured interviews and surveys of NYS program directors (PDs) were conducted in October-December 1999. Simple frequencies are reported. RESULTS: One hundred percent of 17 PDs completed the interviews and seven of 12 participants in the HCFADP returned surveys. Twelve of 17 programs participated in HCFADP and two programs downsized outside HCFADP. Seven of 12 participants lost EM positions. Six of 12 programs were forced to exclude outside residents from rotating in their ED, leading to a need for one participating program and one non-participating program to find alternative sites for trauma. Five of 12 institutions provided resident staffing data, reporting a reduction in ED resident coverage in year 1 of the project of 9-40%. Programs compensated by increasing the number of shifts worked (4/12), increasing shift length (1/12), decreasing pediatric ED shifts (1/12), decreasing elective or research time (2/12), and decreasing off-service rotations (4/12). Six departments hired physician assistants or nurse practitioners, two hired faculty, and two hired resident moonlighters. Six of 12 programs withdrew from HCFADP and returned to previous resident numbers. Eight of 12 PDs thought that they had decreased time for clinical teaching. CONCLUSIONS: A 4-5% reduction in residency positions was associated with a marked reduction in ED resident staffing and EM residency curriculum changes.     

A survey to determine the prevalence and characteristics of training in Evidence-Based Medicine in emergency medicine residency programs

We conducted a survey to determine the prevalence, training methods, and allotment of time for teaching evidence-based medicine (EBM) skills within accredited Emergency Medicine (EM) residency programs in the United States. A survey was mailed to program directors of all 122 accredited Emergency Medicine residency programs. The survey was also sent to program directors using an e-mail listserv. Responses were obtained from 53% of programs; 80% (95% CI: 68-89) of EM programs reported teaching some EBM. Although respondents believed a median of 10 hours were required to adequately cover this topic, only 22% provided more than 5 hours per year. Sixtey-three percent (95% CI: 50-75) of respondents reported using the JAMA Users' Guides series in journal club and 83% reported efforts to link journal clubs to patient care. Perceived barriers to integrating EBM into teaching and patient care included lack of trained faculty, lack of time, lack of familiarity with EBM resources, insufficient funding, and lack of interested faculty. In summary, academic EM programs are attempting to train residents in EBM, but perceive a lack of trained faculty, time, and funding as barriers. Desired resources include a defined curriculum, on-line training for faculty, and defined strategies for integration of EBM into training and patient care.     

Predictors of Success in Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Education

OBJECTIVES: To compare emergency medicine resident performance on an ultrasound-oriented, American Board of Emergency Medicine-styled written examination with the following variables in resident education: number of ultrasound scans performed, presence of a formal, structured ultrasound rotation, presence of a mandatory ultrasound rotation, number of hours of didactic ultrasound education, and percentage of ultrasound education taught by emergency physicians. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study involving 14 residency programs. A 60-question multiple-choice test was completed by individual residents and returned for scoring. RESULTS: 262 residents completed the study. Average score was 39.1/60 +/- 6.5 (65%). Scores improved as residency year increased (year 1: 36.6, year 2: 39.3, year 3: 42.6) (p < 0.005). Scores improved as number of scans performed increased from 34.3 (57%) for those residents who had performed 0-10 scans to 45.4 (76%) for those with >150 scans (p < 0.005). The presence of an ultrasound rotation at an emergency medicine residency program also produced a statistically significant increase in test score (OR 1.82; 95% CI = 1.29 to 2.55). Residents at programs spending the least time (6 to 15 hours) on didactic education throughout the residency predicted examination failure (OR 0.60; 95% CI = 0.39 to 0.93). Increasing the amount of resident ultrasound teaching by emergency physicians improved the score, but this did not reach significance (p = 0.357). CONCLUSIONS: Improved resident performance on an ultrasound written examination was associated with increasing resident year, number of scans performed, and the presence of an ultrasound rotation at the residency program. Increasing the number of didactic hours spent on ultrasound each year beyond 15 hours showed no improvement in resident performance.     

Pilot Study on Documentation Skills: Is There Adequate Training in Emergency Medicine Residency?

Background: Thorough and accurate documentation in the medical record is important, and documentation skills should be an integral component of emergency medicine (EM) residency training. Study Objective: We sought to study the documentation skills of EM residents as they relate to emergency department (ED) reimbursement. Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study. We reviewed all charts of patients presenting to the adult ED during a 2-week period. We compared three groups: patients seen primarily by an EM resident, patients seen primarily by a physician assistant (PA), and patients seen primarily by an attending emergency physician. Outcome measures were the incidence of downcodes and dollars lost to downcodes in all groups. Results: There were 212 patients in the resident group, 683 patients in the PA group, and 437 patients in the attending group. There were 12 downcodes (5.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.96–9.70) in the resident group, 10 downcodes (1.5%, 95% CI 0.70–2.68) in the PA group, and 17 downcodes (3.9%, 95% CI 2.28–6.14) in the attending group (p = 0.002). The mean dollar lost per patient seen in the resident group was $3.21 (95% CI 1.41–5.00); $0.91 (95% CI 0.33–1.49) in the PA group; and $2.23 (95% CI 1.17–3.28) in the attending group (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Charts documented primarily by EM residents were more likely to be downcoded than charts documented primarily by PAs or ED attendings. This downcode rate resulted in a greater loss of revenue in the resident group. We believe this represents an area for improvement in EM residency education.     

The Performance of Procedures on the Recently Deceased

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of performing procedures on the recently deceased for training purposes in emergency departments (EDs) with emergency medicine (EM) training programs. METHODS: Surveys were mailed to program directors of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-approved residency programs in EM. A check-off system was used to identify which procedures were performed and who performed the procedure. The survey also documented whether consent was obtained and whether written policies exist that address this issue. A Likert scale was used to evaluate respondents' attitudes toward this practice. RESULTS: Ninety-six (83%) of 116 surveys were returned. Forty-seven percent of the respondents indicated procedures were performed on the recently deceased for teaching purposes in their EDs. Emergency medicine residents perform the procedures in all departments where this practice occurs, with off-service residents and medical students using this technique in half of those departments. Paramedics, flight nurses, and attending physicians occasionally use this resource. Endotracheal intubation was the most commonly performed procedure. Seventy-six percent stated they "almost never" obtain consent from family members. Only four of 96 respondents have written policies concerning this practice. The majority of program directors (69%) would favor a position statement from a national EM organization concerning this issue, while 11% were opposed. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of procedures on the recently deceased is a common and important practice in EM training programs. Consent is infrequently obtained and policies concerning this practice are rare and restrictive when present.