Value of CT-Guided Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation Added to FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Post Hoc Comparison

PurposeTo compare survival after CT-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) and folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) chemotherapy versus FOLFIRINOX only in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).Materials and MethodsA post hoc comparison was performed of data derived from a prospective IRE-FOLFIRINOX cohort and a retrospective FOLFIRINOX-only cohort. All patients received a minimum of 3 cycles of FOLFIRINOX for LAPC and were considered eligible for CT-guided percutaneous IRE. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), local and distant progression-free survival, and time to progression (TTP) and were compared using stratified Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients who received > 8 cycles of FOLFIRINOX before IRE and who had tumors > 6 cm in the FOLFIRINOX-only group were excluded.ResultsOf 103 patients with a diagnosis of LAPC, 52 were deemed eligible (n = 30 IRE-FOLFIRINOX and n = 22 FOLFIRINOX-only). Patients in the FOLFIRINOX-only arm had larger tumors (53 mm ± 19 vs 38 mm ± 7, P = .340), had more locoregional lymph node metastases (23% vs 7%, P = .622), and more often received radiotherapy (7 patients vs 2 patients, P = .027); all other baseline characteristics were comparable. Median OS was 17.0 months (range, 5–35 mo; SD = 6) for IRE-FOLFIRINOX versus 12.4 months (range, 3–22 mo; SD = 6) for FOLFIRINOX-only (P = .038). After sensitivity analyses, median OS was 17.2 months (range, 6–27 mo; SD = 6) versus 12.4 months (range, 7–32 mo; SD = 10) (P = .05). Median TTP was longer in the IRE-FOLFIRINOX group: 14.2 months (range, 5–25 mo; SD = 4) versus 5.2 months (range, 2–22; SD = 6) (P = .0001).ConclusionsIn patients with LAPC after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy, CT-guided percutaneous IRE may improve OS and TTP. This study may facilitate the design of randomized controlled trials to compare survival after IRE-FOLRINOX versus FOLFIRINOX-only.     

Socioeconomic and Survival Analysis of Radioembolization in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Propensity Score–Adjusted Study

PurposeTo determine whether transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is associated with longer survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and whether access to TARE is influenced by socioeconomic factors.Materials and MethodsRetrospective review of patients with ICC in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2018 was performed with Cox regression analysis to identify predictors of survival. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Socioeconomic factors were compared between 2 groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and χ² test. Propensity score–matched cohorts were created between patients with ICC who did and did not undergo TARE.ResultsThe number of patients receiving TARE for ICC increased over time from 1 in 2004 to 210 in 2018. Patients in the TARE group were more likely to be White (87.9% vs 84.3%; P = .012) and less likely to be Hispanic/Latino (7.7% vs 11.0%; P = .009). Fewer patients who underwent TARE were uninsured (0.9% vs 2.8%; P = .012). Older age, male sex, non-White race, higher tumor grade size, and stage, earlier year of diagnosis, lack of treatment with surgery or systemic therapy, and presence of lymphatic or vascular invasion exhibited significant associations with decreased survival (P < .05 for all). Patients who underwent TARE had longer survival in both unadjusted and adjusted cohorts, with an OS of 17.5 months (vs 7.2 months in the non-TARE group) after propensity matching.ConclusionsPatients with ICC who had undergone TARE experienced significantly longer survival than that experienced by those who had not after adjusting for measurable confounders. Significant socioeconomic disparities in access to TARE remain.     

Hepatic Hilar Nerve Block for Adjunctive Analgesia during Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Hepatic Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis

PurposeTo determine whether hepatic hilar nerve block techniques reduce analgesic and sedation requirements during percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation of hepatic tumors.Materials and MethodsA single-center retrospective cohort analysis was performed of 177 patients (median age, 67 years; range, 33–86 years) who underwent percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation of liver tumors. All patients were treated utilizing local anesthetic and moderate sedation between November 2018 and November 2021 at a tertiary level hospital, with or without the administration of a hepatic hilar nerve block. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between the administration of the hilar nerve block and fentanyl and midazolam dosages.ResultsA total of 114 (64%) patients received a hilar nerve block in addition to procedural sedation, and 63 (36%) patients received procedural sedation alone. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographic and tumor characteristics between the cohorts. The procedure duration was longer in the hilar block cohort than in the unblocked cohort (median, 95 vs 82 minutes; P = .0012). The technical success rate (98% in both the cohorts, P = .93) and adverse event rate (11% vs 3%, P = .14) were not significantly different between the cohorts. After adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics, ablation modality, and procedure and ablation durations, hilar nerve blocks were associated with lower fentanyl (?18.4%, P = .0045) and midazolam (?22.7%, P = .0007) dosages.ConclusionsHepatic hilar nerve blocks significantly decrease the fentanyl and midazolam requirements during thermal ablation of hepatic tumors, without a significant change in the technical success or adverse event rates.     

Yttrium-90 Radiation Segmentectomy in Oligometastatic Secondary Hepatic Malignancies

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) radiation segmentectomy (RS) in the treatment of oligometastatic secondary hepatic malignancies.Materials and MethodsThis institutional review board–approved retrospective study evaluated 16 patients with oligometastatic secondary hepatic malignancies who were treated with RS. The median patient age was 61.9 years (range, 38.6–85.7 years). Of the 16 patients, 11 (68.8%) presented with solitary lesions. The median index tumor size was 3.1 cm (95% CI, 2.3–3.9). Primary outcomes were evaluation of clinical and biochemical toxicities using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, and imaging response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary outcomes were time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsClinical Grade 3 toxicities were limited to 1 (6.7%) patient who experienced fatigue, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Biochemical Grade 3 toxicities occurred in 1 (6.7%) patient who experienced lymphopenia. No Grade 4 clinical or biochemical toxicities were identified. Disease control was achieved in 14 (93.3%) of 15 patients. The median TTP of the treated tumor was 72.9 months (95% CI, 11.2 to no estimate). The median OS was 60.9 months (95% CI, 24.7 to no estimate).Conclusions⁹⁰Y RS displayed an excellent safety profile and was effective in achieving a high disease control rate in the treatment of oligometastatic secondary hepatic malignancies.     

Transarterial Radioembolization versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Percutaneous Ablation for Unresectable,Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma of ≥3 cm: A Propensity Score–Matched Study

PurposeTo compare the safety and effectiveness of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolic agents combined with percutaneous ablation (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE] + ablation) in the treatment of treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of ≥3 cm.Materials and MethodsTwenty-nine patients with treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm received combined TACE + ablation, and 40 patients received TARE at a single institution. Local tumor response, tumor progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, need for reintervention, bridge to transplant, and major complications were compared. Clinical variables and outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsBefore PSM, patients who underwent TARE had a larger tumor size (3.7 vs 5.5 cm; P = .0005) and were older (61.5 vs 69.3 years; P = .0014). After PSM, there was no difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, with the mean tumor sizes measuring 3.9 and 4.1 cm in the TACE + ablation and TARE cohorts, respectively. After PSM (n = 19 in each group), no statistically significant difference was observed in local radiological response (disease control rates, 100% vs 94.7%; P = .31), survival (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28–1.80; P = .469), PFS (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.21–1.71; P = .342), bridge to transplant (21.1% vs 31.6%, P = .46), and major adverse event rates (15.8% vs 10.5%, P = .63) between the 2 groups. The mean total number of locoregional interventions was higher in the TACE + ablation cohort (1.9 vs 1.3 sessions, P = .02), with an earlier median reintervention trend (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.20–1.32; P = .167).ConclusionsThe present study showed that TARE and the combination of TACE and ablation are comparable in safety and effectiveness for treating treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm.     

Comparative Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with and without Pre-Existing Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts

PurposeTo compare the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with and without transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS).Materials and MethodsThis single-institution study included a retrospective review of 50 patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization for HCC between January 2010 and April 2017. Twenty-five patients had preexisting TIPS, and 25 patients were selected to control for age, sex, and target tumor size. Baseline median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD; 13 TIPS, 9 control; P < .001) and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI; 3 TIPS, 2 control; P < .001) differed between groups. Safety was assessed on the basis of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and change in MELD and ALBI grade assessed between 3 and 6 months. Efficacy was assessed by tumor response and time to progression (TTP).ResultsThere was 1 severe adverse event (CTCAE grade >2) in the TIPS group. There was no difference in the change in MELD or ALBI grade. Although there was no difference in tumor response (P = .19), more patients achieved a complete response in the control group (19/25, 76%) than in the TIPS group (13/25, 52%). There was no difference in TTP (P = .82). At 1 year, 2 patients in the control group and 3 patients in the TIPS group received a liver transplant. Seven patients died in the TIPS group.ConclusionsTransarterial chemoembolization is as safe and effective in patients with TIPS as in patients without TIPS, despite worse baseline liver function. Severe adverse events are rare and may be transient.     

Preliminary Study of Microwave Ablation for Multifocal Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma in Nonoperative Candidates

PurposeTo study the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of microwave ablation (MWA) in patients with multifocal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC).Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included patients who underwent MWA for multifocal PTMC (number of nodules ≤3). A total of 44 patients were included, and the mean age was 43 years (SD ± 11). After ablation, progression-free survival (PFS) at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months; disease progression; change in tumor size and volume; tumor disappearance rate; and adverse events (AEs) were assessed, and the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of MWA for PTMC were evaluated on the basis of statistical analysis.ResultsThe median follow-up period was 18 months (interquartile range, 12–33 months). The PFS rates at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 100.0%, 96.4%, 96.4%, 70.3%, and 52.7%, respectively. The disease progression rate was 11.4% (5 of 44 patients). The maximum diameter (MD) and volume of the ablation zone were larger at the 3-month follow-up than before ablation (median MD, 13.0 vs 7.0 mm; P < .001; median volume, 503.8 vs 113.0 mm³; P < .001). Subsequently, the tumors exhibited a reduction in both size and volume after 18 months (median MD, 4.0 vs 7.0 mm; P = .04; median volume, 12.6 vs 113.0 mm³; P = .055). At the end of the follow-up period, the complete response rate was 59% (26 of 44 patients). The overall AE rate was 6.8%.ConclusionsMWA is a feasible treatment for PTMC (number of nodules ≤3), and this study preliminarily demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of this technique.     

Effect of Median Lobe Enlargement on Early Prostatic Artery Embolization Outcomes

PurposeTo evaluate outcomes after prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in patients with severe intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP).Materials and MethodsThis was a retrospective, single health system, 2-hospital study from April 2015 to December 2018 of 54 patients who underwent elective PAE procedures (age mean 67.5 years; standard deviation [SD] 8.5). The cohort had a mean ellipsoid prostate volume of 100.1 cm³ (SD 56.7), a mean baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of 18.7 (SD 8.2), a mean baseline quality of life (QOL) score of 4.1 (SD 1.4), and a median follow-up of 38 days (range 10–656 days). Outcomes including IPSS and QOL score reduction (where a lower QOL score indicates an improvement in QOL), and clinical success were compared between severe (≥10 mm) and nonsevere (<10 mm) IPP patients. A linear regression model was used to examine the impact of IPP on these outcomes.ResultsNo significant differences in patient characteristics were found between nonsevere (n = 17) and severe (n = 37) IPP patients. Both cohorts showed IPSS reduction (nonsevere 6.0, P = .0397; severe 8.2, P < .0001) and QOL score reduction (nonsevere 1.0, P = .102; severe 2.0, P < .0001). No significant differences in IPSS or QOL score reduction were found between the cohorts (P = .431 and P = .127). Linear regression found that baseline IPP was not a significant contributor to the outcomes (IPSS: R² = .5, P < .0001; IPP: P = .702; QOL: R² = .5, P = .0003; IPP: P = .108).ConclusionsThere were no significant differences in early outcomes in PAE between patients with severe and nonsevere IPP.     

Impact of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Complications and Oncologic Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Thermal Ablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma

PurposeTo determine effect of body mass index (BMI) on safety and cancer-related outcomes of thermal ablation for renal cell carcinoma (RRC).Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated 427 patients (287 men and 140 women; mean [SD] age, 72 [12] y) who were treated with thermal ablation for RCC between October 2006 and December 2017. Patients were stratified by BMI into 3 categories: normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m²), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m²), and obese (≥ 30 kg/m²). Of 427 patients, 71 (16%) were normal weight, 157 (37%) were overweight, and 199 (47%) were obese. Complication rates, local recurrence, and residual disease were compared in the 3 cohorts.ResultsNo differences in technical success between normal-weight, overweight, and obese patients were identified (P = .72). Primary technique efficacy rates for normal-weight, overweight, and obese patients were 91%, 94%, and 93% (P = .71). There was no significant difference in RCC specific–free survival, disease-free survival, and metastasis-free survival between obese, overweight, and normal-weight groups (P = .72, P = .43, P = .99). Complication rates between the 3 cohorts were similar (normal weight 4%, overweight 2%, obese 3%; P = .71).ConclusionsCT-guided renal ablation is safe, feasible, and effective regardless of BMI.     

Unplanned 30-Day Readmissions after Management of Submassive and Massive Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Catheter-Directed versus Systemic Thrombolysis

PurposeTo compare 30-day readmission and in-hospital outcomes from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) for catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) versus systemic intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) as treatments for acute submassive or massive pulmonary embolism (PE).Materials and MethodsThe NRD was queried from 2016 to 2019 for adult patients with nonseptic acute PE who underwent IVT or CDT. Massive PE was distinguished from submassive PE if patients had concurrent International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes corresponding to mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, or shock. Propensity score–matched analysis was conducted to infer the association of CDT versus IVT in unplanned 30-day readmissions, nonroutine discharge, gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). These results are demonstrated as average treatment effects (ATEs) of IVT compared with those of CDT.ResultsA total of 37,116 patients with acute PE were studied; 18,702 (50.3%) underwent CDT, and 18,414 (49.7%) underwent IVT. A total of 2,083 (11.1%) and 3,423 (18.6%) were massive PEs in the 2 groups, respectively (P < .001). The ATE of IVT was higher than that of CDT regarding unplanned 30-day readmissions (ATE, 0.019; P < .001), GIB (ATE, 0.012; P < .001), ICH (ATE, 0.003; P = .017), and nonroutine discharge (ATE, 0.022; P = .006). The subgroup analysis of patients with submassive PE demonstrated that IVT had a higher ATE regarding unplanned 30-day readmission (ATE, 0.028; P < .001), GIB (ATE, 0.008; P = .003), ICH (ATE, 0.002; P = .035), and nonroutine discharge (ATE, 0.019; P = .022) than CDT.ConclusionsCDT had a lower likelihood of unplanned 30-day readmissions, including when stratified by a submassive PE subtype. Additionally, adverse events, including ICH and GIB, were more likely among patients who received IVT than among those who received CDT.     

Uterine Artery Embolization following Cesarean Delivery but prior to Hysterectomy in the Management of Patients with Invasive Placenta

PurposeTo evaluate outcomes of patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders who underwent uterine artery embolization (UAE) following cesarean delivery but before hysterectomy.Materials and MethodsA retrospective review of patients with PAS treated with cesarean-hysterectomy (C-hyst) was performed. Patients in the UAE group underwent UAE after cesarean delivery but before hysterectomy; patients in the control group underwent C-hyst alone. Estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion requirements, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and adverse events were evaluated.ResultsThe study included 31 patients, 7 in the UAE group and 24 in the control group. Median EBL, transfusion requirements, and length of ICU stay in the UAE group compared with control group were 1,500 mL (range, 500–2,000 mL) vs 2,000 mL (range, 1,000–4,500 mL) (P = .04), 150 mL (range, 0–650 mL) vs 550 mL (range, 0–3,125 mL) (P = .10), and 0 d (range, 0–1 d) vs 0.5 d (range, 0–2 d) (P = .07). All patients in the UAE group had placenta increta; patients in the control group had placenta accreta (29%), increta (54%), and percreta (17%) (P = .10). Subgroup analysis of patients with placenta increta demonstrated that the UAE group had a significant decrease in median EBL (P = .004), transfusion requirements (P = .009), and length of ICU stay (P = .04). No adverse events following UAE were noted.ConclusionsUAE following cesarean delivery but before hysterectomy in patients with placenta increta appears to be safe and effective in decreasing EBL, transfusion requirements, and length of ICU stay compared with C-hyst alone.     

Predictors of Progression-Free Survival and Local Tumor Control after Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: Retrospective Study

PurposeTo describe ablation of bone, liver, lung, and soft tissue tumors from oligometastatic breast cancer and to define predictors of local progression and progression-free survival (PFS).Materials and MethodsA total of 33 women (mean age 52 ± 12 years old; range, 28–69 years), underwent 46 thermal ablations of liver (n = 35), lung (n = 7), and bone/soft tissue (n = 4) metastases. Mean tumor diameter was 18 ± 15 mm (range, 6–50 mm). Ablations were performed to eradicate all evident sites of disease (n = 24) or to control growing sites in the setting of other stable or responding sites of disease (n = 22). Patient characteristics, ablation margins, imaging responses, and cases of PFS were assessed. Follow-up imaging was performed using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, or positron-emission tomography/ CT.ResultsMedian PFS was 10 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2 –14.5 months), and time to local progression was 11 months (95% CI, 5–16 months). Eight patients (24%) maintained no evidence of disease during a median follow-up period of 39 months. Ablation margin ≥5 mm was associated with no local tumor progression. Longer PFS was noted in estrogen receptor-positive patients (12 vs 4 months; P = .037) and younger patients (12 vs 4 months; P = .039) treated to eradicate all sites of disease (13 vs 5 months; P = .05). Eighteen patients (55%) developed new metastases during study follow-up.ConclusionsThermal ablation of oligometastatic pulmonary, hepatic, bone, and soft tissue tumors can eliminate local tumor progression if margins are ≥5 mm. Longer PFS was observed in patients who were estrogen receptor-positive and patients who were younger and in whom all sites of disease were eradicated.     

Survival of Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases after Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Irinotecan-Eluting Microspheres: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis Comparing RECIST 1.1 and Choi Criteria

PurposeTo evaluate the factors that affected overall survival and hepatic progression–free survival using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and Choi criteria in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using irinotecan-eluting microspheres (IEMs) who failed at least 1 line of systemic chemotherapy.Materials and MethodsA single-institution retrospective analysis was performed including patients with unresectable liver metastases from a colorectal primary malignancy and treated with IEM-TACE. Radiologic hepatic progression–free survival was measured using the RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria.ResultsThe median patient age was 61.5 years, with 80 (67%) men. A total of 328 IEM-TACE procedures were performed during the study period. One hundred eighteen patients who failed at least 1 line of systemic chemotherapy before TACE demonstrated a median overall survival of 12.7 months. Overall survival was higher in patients who had previous primary resection (P < .05), prior ablation (P < .05), or completed the scheduled TACE treatments (P < .05) but was adversely affected by the presence of extrahepatic disease (P < .05) and larger preprocedural tumor burden (P < .01). Prior systemic chemotherapy lines (P = .98) and microsphere size (P = .34) did not affect survival. Partial radiologic response to treatment using the Choi criteria (n = 28, P < .01) correlated significantly with survival, a correlation not seen with the RECIST 1.1 measurements (n = 5, P = .13).ConclusionsA partial response to treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases treated by TACE with IEMs measured using the Choi criteria correlated significantly with improved survival, while RECIST 1.1 measurements did not.     

Comparison of Opioid Medication Use after Conventional Chemoembolization versus Drug-Eluting Embolic Chemoembolization

PurposeTo assess the use of opioid analgesics and/or antiemetic drugs for pain and nausea following selective chemoembolization with doxorubicin-based conventional (c)-transarterial chemoembolization versus drug-eluting embolic (DEE)-transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsFrom October 2014 to 2016, 283 patients underwent 393 selective chemoembolization procedures including 188 patients (48%) who underwent c-transarterial chemoembolization and 205 (52%) who underwent DEE-transarterial chemoembolization. Medical records for all patients were retrospectively reviewed. Administration of postprocedural opioid and/or antiemetic agents were collated. Time of administration was stratified as phase 1 recovery (0–6 hours) and observation (6–24 hours). Logistic regression model was used to investigate the relationship of transarterial chemoembolization type and use of intravenous and/or oral analgesic and antiemetic medications while controlling for other clinical variables.ResultsMore patients treated with DEE-transarterial chemoembolization required intravenous analgesia in the observation (6–24 hours) phase (18.5%) than those treated with c-transarterial chemoembolization (10.6%; P = .033). Similar results were noted for oral analgesic agents (50.2% vs. 31.4%, respectively; P < .001) and antiemetics (17.1% vs. 7.5%, respectively; P = .006) during the observation period. Multivariate regression models identified DEE-transarterial chemoembolization as an independent predictor for oral analgesia (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; P = .011), for intravenous and oral analgesia in opioid-naïve patients (OR, 2.46; P = .029) and for antiemetics (OR, 2.56; P = .011).ConclusionsCompared to c-transarterial chemoembolization, DEE-transarterial chemoembolization required greater amounts of opioid analgesic and antiemetic agents 6–24 hours after the procedure. Surgical data indicate that a persistent opioid habit can develop even after minor surgeries, therefore, caution should be exercised, and a regimen of nonopiate pain medications should be considered to reduce postprocedural pain after transarterial chemoembolization.     

Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Underwent Microwave Ablation after Downstaging with Transarterial Chemoembolization to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage A

PurposeTo compare the clinical results of microwave ablation (MWA) between patients downstaged to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage A with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and those initially classified as BCLC Stage A.Materials and MethodsFrom January 2012 to May 2017, 1,087 patients were reviewed retrospectively using propensity score matching (1:1): 86 patients underwent MWA as a curative treatment after downstaging to BCLC Stage A by TACE (downstaging group) and 86 patients initially classified as BCLC Stage A underwent MWA (control group). The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the 2 groups were compared.ResultsThe 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 95.3%, 79.1%, and 58.1%, respectively, in the downstaging group and 93.0%, 81.4%, and 61.6%, respectively, in the control group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.50–1.13; P = .162). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates were 80.2%, 50.0%, and 24.4%, respectively, in the downstaging group and 77.9%, 52.3%, and 27.9%, respectively, in the control group (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.76–1.53; P = .678). No significant differences were found in OS and DFS.ConclusionsThe long-term prognosis in patients with HCC who underwent MWA after downstaging to BCLC Stage A using TACE was similar to that in patients with initial BCLC Stage A.     

Midterm Outcomes of Angioplasty for Pediatric Renovascular Hypertension

PurposeTo evaluate the midterm outcomes of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) for pediatric renovascular hypertension (RVH).Materials and MethodsThe clinical data of patients who underwent PTRA for RVH in the authors’ hospital from 2012 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Postprocedural blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of the affected kidney, restenosis, and complications were closely monitored.ResultsPTRA was performed in a total of 30 children (20 boys and 10 girls), with a mean age of 7.3 years ± 0.7 (range, 40 days to 13.9 years) and a mean weight of 25.0 kg ± 2.3 (range, 3.4–53 kg). The median follow-up period was 26.5 months (range, 1 month to 7.5 years). Technical success was achieved in 26 (86.7%) of the 30 patients. Restenosis developed in 3 patients (10.0%). Only 1 patient underwent stent implantation, and the stent fractured 8 months later, requiring further intervention. There were no other complications. In terms of clinical benefit of blood pressure control after the initial PTRA procedure, 15 patients (50%) were cured and 7 patients (23.3%) showed improvement. There was no significant difference in the etiology, lesion location, and lesion length between patients with clinical benefit and failure (P = .06, P = .202, and P = .06, respectively). GFR of the affected kidney was significantly improved from 19.9 mL/min ± 11.2 to 38.1 mL/min ± 11.9 at the 6-month follow-up after PTRA (P < .001).ConclusionsThe overall results of PTRA for pediatric RVH caused by different etiologies are promising. PTRA not only provided a clinical benefit of blood pressure control in 73.3% of the patients but also significantly improved the function of the affected kidney.     

Transarterial Chemoembolization Followed by Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Impact of the Time Interval between the Two Treatments on Outcome

PurposeTo compare the efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablation after transarterial chemoembolization within or beyond 30 days for medium-large or multiple recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).Materials and MethodsIn this single-center retrospective study conducted from 2007 through 2015, 135 patients with a single recurrent HCC (>3 cm) or multiple (2–5 tumors) recurrent HCCs underwent transarterial chemoembolization plus RF ablation. A total of 62 patients underwent RF ablation after transarterial chemoembolization within 30 days (sequential group) and 73 patients underwent RF ablation after transarterial chemoembolization beyond 30 days (delayed group). Outcomes of interests included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and complete response (CR) rate.ResultsThe median OS and PFS were 49.8 and 38.0 months for sequential group, and 31.0 and 11.6 months for the delayed group. The sequential group experienced significantly better OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.517; P = .002) and PFS (HR, 0.621; P = .021). Among patients with multiple tumors or a single tumor >5 cm, the sequential group still had significantly longer OS (P = .022; P = .018, respectively) and PFS (P = 0.042; P = .036, respectively) than the delayed group, although no significant differences were observed among patients with solitary 3- to 5-cm tumors (P = .138; P = .803, respectively). The sequential group had a significantly better CR rate than the delayed group (85.4% vs. 68.5%, respectively; P = .035). Significant predictors of OS and PFS included maximum tumor size, number of tumors, and time interval between transarterial chemoembolization and RF ablation.ConclusionsTransarterial chemoembolization plus sequential RF ablation within 30 days was more effective for recurrent HCCs than transarterial chemoembolization plus delayed RF ablation. The time interval within 30 days is required for treating large or multiple HCCs but may not be necessary for solitary medium-sized HCC.     

Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Using Fluorouracil,Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin versus Transarterial Chemoembolization as Initial Treatment for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score–Matching Analysis

PurposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with a modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX) regimen with that of transarterial chemoembolization as a locoregional treatment for patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsThis retrospective study included adult patients with locally advanced HCC who received first-line treatment with either HAIC-mFOLFOX or conventional transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy from January 2015 to December 2016. The outcomes, including tumor response rates, evaluated via imaging assessment using the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; overall survival; progression-free survival; and safety, were compared. The propensity score–matching methodology was used to reduce the influence of confounding factors on the outcomes.ResultsThe study included 131 patients with locally advanced HCC who underwent transarterial chemoembolization and 101 who received HAIC-mFOLFOX as initial treatment. After propensity score matching (n = 67 in each group), patients who received HAIC-mFOLFOX had a higher objective response rate (43.3% vs 13.4%, P = .001), longer median overall survival (13.9 vs 6.0 months, P < .001), and longer median progression-free survival (6.4 vs 2.8 months, P = .001) than those who underwent transarterial chemoembolization. The survival benefit with HAIC-mFOLFOX was strengthened in patients with HCC with vascular invasion (hazard ratio: 0.379; 95% confidence interval: 0.237–0.607). HAIC-mFOLFOX was associated with lower incidences of severe adverse events (8.9% vs 22.9%) and liver toxicity than transarterial chemoembolization.ConclusionsCompared with transarterial chemoembolization, HAIC-mFOLFOX is a potentially safer and more effective locoregional therapy for patients with locally advanced HCC.     

Comparing Endovascular and Surgical Treatments for Varicocele: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PurposeTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the relative efficacy of endovascular and surgical treatments for varicocele.Materials and MethodsPubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify studies reporting on the outcomes associated with surgical or endovascular treatments of varicoceles. The studies that assessed the relative efficacy of surgical and endovascular treatments for patients with clinical varicocele were eligible for inclusion. Pooled data analyses were performed.ResultsA total of 16 studies incorporating 2,138 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. The pooled risk ratio (RR) values suggested that rates of adverse events were lower among patients who underwent endovascular treatment than those who underwent surgical treatment (RR, 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42–0.93; P = .02). Both treatments were associated with similar rates of recurrence (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78–1.36; P = .82) and pregnancy (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.85–1.25; P = .82).ConclusionsThese data demonstrate that endovascular treatment for varicocele is associated with similar rates of recurrence and subsequent pregnancy outcomes compared with surgical treatment but with lower rates of adverse events.