Prior surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures is associated with increased complications following subsequent reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to compare complication rates between patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) after a prior open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for proximal humerus fracture (PHF) to those undergoing RSA as a primary treatment for PHFs, glenohumeral osteoarthritis, or rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA).MethodsPatients who underwent RSA between 2015 and 2020 were identified in the Mariner database. Patients were separated into 3 mutually exclusive groups: (1) RSA for osteoarthritis, rotator cuff tear, or CTA (Control-RSA); (2) RSA as a primary treatment for PHF (PHF-RSA); and (3) RSA for patients with prior ORIF of PHFs (ORIF-RSA). Ninety-day medical and 2-year postoperative surgical complications were identified. In addition, patients in the PHF-RSA group were subdivided into those undergoing RSA for PHF within 3 months of the fracture (acute) vs. those treated greater than 3 months from diagnosis (delayed). Multivariate regression was performed to control for differences in comorbidities and demographics.ResultsA total of 30,824 patients underwent primary RSA for arthritis or CTA, 5389 patients underwent RSA as a primary treatment for a PHF, and 361 patients underwent RSA after ORIF of a PHF. ORIF before RSA was associated with an increased risk of overall revision (odds ratio [OR] 2.45, P = .002), infection (OR 2.40, P < .001), instability (OR 2.43, P < .001), fracture (OR 3.24, P = .001), minor medical complications (OR 1.59, P = .008), and readmission (OR 2.55, P = .001) compared with the Control-RSA cohort. RSA as a primary treatment for PHF was associated with an increased risk of 2-year revision (OR 1.60, P < .001), infection (OR 1.51, P < .001), instability (OR 2.84, P < .001), and fracture (OR 2.54, P < .001) in addition to major medical complications (OR 2.02, P < .001), minor medical complications (OR 1.92, P < .001), 90-day emergency department visits (OR 1.26, P < .001) and 90-day readmission (OR 2.03, P < .001) compared with the Control-RSA cohort. The ORIF-RSA group had an increased risk of periprosthetic infection (OR 1.94, P = .002) when compared with the PHF-RSA cohort. There were no differences in medical or surgical complications in the RSA-PHF cohort between patients treated in an acute or delayed fashion.ConclusionRSA following ORIF of a PHF is associated with increased complications compared with patients undergoing RSA for nonfracture indications. Prior ORIF of a PHF is also an independent risk factor for postoperative infection after RSA compared with patients who undergo RSA as a primary operation for fracture. The timing of RSA as a primary operation for PHF does not appear to impact the rates of postoperative medical and surgical complications.     

Racial Disparities in Rates of Revision and use of Modern Features in Total Knee Arthroplasty,a National Registry Study

BackgroundThe purpose of our study was to investigate the association of race and ethnicity with rates of modern implant use and postoperative outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons American Joint Replacement Registry.MethodsAdult TKAs from 2012 to 2020 were queried from the American Joint Replacement Registry. A total of 1,121,457 patients were available for analysis for surgical features and 1,068,210 patients for analysis of outcomes. Mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association of race with each individual surgical feature (unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA)) and 30- and 90-day readmission. A proportional subdistribution hazard model was used to model the risk of revision TKA.ResultsOn multivariate analyses, compared to White patients, Black (odds ratio (OR): 0.52 P < .0001), Hispanic (OR 0.75 P < .001), and Native American (OR: 0.69 P = .0011) patients had lower rates of UKA, while only Black patients had lower rates of RA-TKA (OR = 0.76 P < .001). White (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.8, P < .001), Asian (HR = 0.51, P < .001), and Hispanic-White (HR = 0.73, P = .001) patients had a lower risk of revision TKA than Black patients. Asian patients had a lower revision risk than White (HR = 0.64, P < .001) and Hispanic-White (HR = 0.69, P = .011) patients. No significant differences existed between groups for 30- or 90-day readmissions.ConclusionBlack, Hispanic, and Native American patients had lower rates of UKA compared to White patients, while Black patients had lower rates of RA-TKA compared to White, Asian, and Hispanic patients. Black patients also had higher rates of revision TKA than other races.     

The Impact of Epilepsy on Complication Rates After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score–Matched Cohort Study

BackgroundIt is unclear how epilepsy may affect total joint arthroplasty outcomes. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of epilepsy on prosthesis-related complications following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using a national database. Patients who have epilepsy underwent a primary THA (n = 6,981) and TKA (n = 4,987) and were matched 1:4 (THA, n = 27,924; TKA, n = 19,948). Rates of low-energy falls and prosthesis-related complications within 2 years postoperatively were compared for patients who did and did not have epilepsy with multivariable logistic regression.ResultsAfter primary TKA, patients who have epilepsy exhibited significantly higher rates of aseptic revision (4.3% versus 3.5%, odds ratio [OR] 1.21, P = .017) and revision for prosthetic joint infection (1.8% versus 1.3%, OR 1.29, P = .041). THA patients who have epilepsy exhibited significantly higher rates of prosthetic dislocation (3.2% versus 1.9%, OR 1.54, P < .001), periprosthetic fracture (2.2% versus 0.8%, OR 2.39, P < .001), and aseptic loosening (1.7% versus 1.1%, OR 1.40, P = .002). Rates of low-energy falls within 2 years after TKA (14.1% versus 6.4%, OR 2.19, P < .001) and THA (33.6% versus 7.5%, OR 5.95, P < .001) were also significantly higher for patients who have epilepsy.ConclusionEpilepsy was associated with significantly higher rates of falls (P < .001) and prosthesis-related complications after primary THA (P < .05) and TKA (P < .05). Precautions should be implemented in this population during intraoperative and perioperative decision-making to reduce complication risk.Level of EvidenceLevel III.     

Is Conversion TKA a Primary or Revision? Clinical Course and Complication Risks Approximating Revision TKA Rather Than Primary TKA

BackgroundConversion total knee arthroplasty (convTKA) is associated with increased resource utilization and costs compared with primary TKA. The purpose of this study is to compare 1) surgical time, 2) hospitalization length (LOS), 3) complications, 4) infection, and 5) readmissions in patients undergoing convTKA to both primary TKA and revision TKA patients.MethodsThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried from 2008 to 2018. Patients undergoing convTKA (n = 1,665, 0.5%) were defined by selecting Current Procedural Terminology codes 27,447 and 20,680. We compared the outcomes of interest to patients undergoing primary TKA (n = 348,624) and to patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA (n = 8213). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the relative risk of postoperative complications.ResultsCompared with patients undergoing primary TKA, convTKA patients were younger (P < .001), had lower body mass index (P < .001), and were less likely to be American Society of Anesthesiologist class III/IV (P < .001). These patients had significantly longer operative times (122.6 vs 90.3 min, P < .001), increased LOS (P < .001), increased risks for any complication (OR 1.94), surgical site infection (OR 1.84), reoperation (OR 2.18), and readmissions (OR 1.60) after controlling for confounders. Compared with aseptic TKA revisions, operative times were shorter (122.6 vs 148.2 min, P < .001), but LOS (2.91 vs 2.95 days, P = .698) was similar. Furthermore, relative risk for any complication (P = .350), surgical site infection (P = .964), reoperation (P = .296), and readmissions (P = .844) did not differ.ConclusionConversion TKA procedures share more similarities with revision TKA rather than primary TKA procedures. Without a distinct procedural and diagnosis-related group, there are financial disincentives to care for these complex patients.Level of EvidenceII.     

Impact of staff turnover during cardiac surgical procedures

ObjectiveThe impact of staff turnover during cardiac procedures is unknown. Accurate inventory of sharps (needles/blades) requires attention by surgical teams, and sharp count errors result in delays, can lead to retained foreign objects, and may signify communication breakdown. We hypothesized that increased team turnover raises the likelihood of sharp count errors and may negatively affect patient outcomes.MethodsAll cardiac operations performed at our institution from May 2011 to March 2016 were reviewed for sharp count errors from a prospectively maintained database. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed.ResultsAmong 7264 consecutive cardiac operations, sharp count errors occurred in 723 cases (10%). There were no retained sharps detected by x-ray in our series. Sharp count errors were lower on first start cases (7.7% vs 10.7%, P < .001). Cases with sharp count errors were longer than those without (7 vs 5.7 hours, P < .001). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with an increase in sharp count errors were non–first start cases (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; P = .006), weekend cases (OR, 1.6; P < .004), more than 2 scrub personnel (3 scrubs: OR, 1.3; P = .032; 4 scrubs: OR, 2; P < .001; 5 scrubs: OR, 2.4; P = .004), and more than 1 circulating nurse (2 nurses: OR, 1.9; P < .001; 3 nurses: OR, 2; P < .001; 4 nurses: OR, 2.4; P < .001; 5 nurses: OR, 3.1; P < .001). Sharp count errors were associated with higher rates of in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.9; P = .038).ConclusionsSharp count errors are more prevalent with increased team turnover and during non–first start cases or weekends. Sharp count errors may be a surrogate marker for other errors and thus increased mortality. Reducing intraoperative team turnover or optimizing hand-offs may reduce sharp count errors.     

Hypogonadism Is Associated With Increased Risks of Postoperative Complications Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundDespite being a relatively common problem among aging men, hypogonadism has not been previously studied as a potential risk factor for postoperative complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsIn total, 3903 male patients with a diagnosis of hypogonadism who underwent primary THA from 2006 to 2012 were identified using a national insurance database and compared to 20:1 matched male controls using a logistic regression analysis.ResultsHypogonadism was associated with an increased risk of major medical complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.24, P = .022), urinary tract infection (OR 1.43, P < .001), wound complications (OR 1.33, P = .011), deep vein thrombosis (OR 1.64, P < .001), emergency room visit (OR 1.24, P < .001), readmission (OR 1.14, P = .015), periprosthetic joint infection (OR 1.37 and 1.43, P < .05), dislocation (OR 1.51 and 1.48, P < .001), and revision (OR 1.54 and 1.56, P < .001) following THA. A preoperative diagnosis of hypogonadism was associated with increased total reimbursement and charges by $390 (P < .001) and $4514 (P < .001), respectively.ConclusionThe diagnosis of hypogonadism is associated with an elevated risk of postoperative complications and increased cost of care following primary THA. Data from this study should influence the discussion between the patient and the provider prior to undergoing joint replacement and serve as the basis for further research.     

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: trends in the incidence,indications and complications as reported by ABOS part II oral examination candidates from 2005 through 2017

BackgroundThe experience of early-career orthopedic surgeons performing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has not been previously reported. The aims of this study were to evaluate (1) the temporal trends in the incidence of and indications for RSA procedures performed among board-eligible orthopedic surgeons, (2) the temporal trends in the incidence of reported complications after RSA, and (3) the patient-related and surgeon-related variables that affected the reported complication rate.MethodsA query of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II Oral Examination database for all cases of RSA from 2003 through 2017 was performed. The data over this time period was analyzed for incidence, indications, and complications. Risk factors for complication including patient demographic factors and shoulder fellowship training were also evaluated.ResultsFrom 2003 to 2017, a total of 2,633 RSA procedures were reported. There was an increased incidence of RSA (23-fold) and increased proportion of candidates performing RSA (19-fold) (P-trend < .001). While there was an increasing trend seen in the proportion of primary (P-trend = .009) and trauma cases (P-trend < .001), declining trend was seen in the proportion of revision cases (P-trend < .001). An increasing trend was seen in the proportion of RSA cases for off-label indications (P-trend < .001). Shoulder fellowship-training was reported by 27% of the candidates, and these candidates performed 42% of all RSA procedures. The complication rate over this time period was 34% and the incidence of medical, surgical and anesthesia complications was 18%, 15%, and 1.2%, respectively. The incidence of complications increased over the study period (P-trend < .001). Mortality, reoperation, and readmission rates were 0.6%, 3.2%, and 6.4%, respectively. Risk factors for medical complications were age and trauma cases, whereas revision RSA was a risk factor for surgical complications. Shoulder fellowship-training experience was not associated with a decrease in any of the complications.ConclusionThere was a dramatic increase in the use of RSA among board eligible orthopedic surgeons in the United States. The early complication rates for ABOS candidates performing RSA are above others reported in the literature and showed an increasing trend over the study period. Despite the improvements in the literature, and shoulder fellowship training, there has been no decrease in the incidence of surgical complications over the decade represented in this study.Level of evidenceLevel III; Cross-Sectional Design; Treatment Study     

Impact of Predicted Heart Mass–Based Donor-Recipient Size Matching on Transplant Outcomes

BackgroundCurrently, guidelines for appropriate donor sizing in recipients mostly focuses on donor–recipient body weight matching. The purpose is to retrospectively determine the impact of predicted heart mass (pHM)–based size matching on heart transplant (HT) outcomes.MethodsAccording to our institutional registry, 512 consecutive adult patients underwent HT between January 2000 and August 2020. For each patient, pHM and donor-recipient pHM ratio were calculated. Patients were partitioned into quintiles in terms of pHM ratio: undersizing 2, undersizing 1, reference, oversizing 1, and oversizing 2, with mean pHM donor–recipient ratio of 0.81, 0.96, 1.04, 1.12, and 1.28, respectively. Severe early graft failure and 30-day, 90-day, 1-year, and 10-year mortality were analyzed as outcomes.ResultsRecipients of the most oversized group were mostly female (P < .001), had higher preoperative pulmonary vascular resistance (P = .009), had higher rate of mechanical circulatory support (P < .05), and showed a lower United Network for Organ Sharing score (P = .041); the respective donors were younger and more frequently male (P = .001). Ischemic time was similar in all groups (P = .358). Pulmonary vascular resistance (P = .023; odds ratio [OR], 2.38), preoperative mechanical circulatory support (P = .05; OR, 3.06), and United Network for Organ Sharing score (P = .033; OR, 1.76) were identified as risk factors for early mortality. Donor-recipient pHM ratio did not impact early graft failure (P = .871) and early mortality (P = .526). Survival analysis after adjustment for pHM ratio subgroups did not show any difference in outcomes.ConclusionsA wide range of pHM ratios seems to be safe. A careful allocation of organs, by considering a pHM ratio mismatch, may balance rescue preoperative clinical profiles and preserve HT outcomes.     

Systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm

ObjectiveWomen face distinctive challenges when they receive endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) treatment, and according to the previous studies, sex differences in outcomes after EVAR for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes between women and men after EVAR for infrarenal AAA.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of all available studies reporting sex differences after EVAR for infrarenal AAA, which were retrieved from the MEDICINE, Embase, and Cochrane Database. The pooled results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous data and hazard ratios for time-to-event data using a random effect model.ResultsThirty-six cohorts were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that women were associated with a significantly increased risk of 30-day mortality (crude OR, 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-1.87; P < .001; adjusted OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.32-2.26; P < .001), in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.43-2.53; P < .001), limb ischemia (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.73-2.43; P < .001), renal complications (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.12-2.67; P = .028), cardiac complications (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.01-2.80; P = .046), and long-term all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.38; P = .001) compared with men; however, no significant sex difference was observed for visceral/mesenteric ischemia (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.91-2.88; P = .098), 30-day reinterventions (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.95-1.98; P = .095), late endoleaks (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.88-1.56; P = .264), and late reinterventions (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.78-1.41; P = .741). In the intact AAA subgroup, women had a significantly increased risk of visceral/mesenteric ischemia (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.01-3.39; P = .046) and an equivalent risk of cardiac complications (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.85-3.17; P = .138) compared with men.ConclusionsCompared with male sex, female sex is associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, limb ischemia, renal complications, cardiac complications, and long-term all-cause mortality after EVAR for infrarenal AAA. Women should be enrolled in a strict and regular long-term surveillance after EVAR.     

Revision of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty to revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty leads to significant clinical and functional improvement

BackgroundReverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is rapidly growing in the United States. As the number of procedures increases, the number of complications and need for additional surgeries correspondingly continues to grow. The purpose of this study was to describe clinical and functional outcomes of revision of RSA to RSA.MethodsA retrospective review of 29 patients from 2 centers who underwent revision surgery following RSA to RSA from 2007 to 2017 was conducted. The reasons for revision were recorded. Clinical outcome measures including shoulder range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation score, simple shoulder test and Visual analog scale scores were collected for all patients at an average follow-up of 29 months. Postoperative complications were also recorded.ResultsA total of 29 patients were identified. The average time between index RSA and revision was 2.3 years (30 days – 7 years). Mean follow-up duration for clinical outcome measures was 29.1 months (12-114 months). The most common indication for revision surgery was aseptic loosening (13/29, 44.8%), followed by instability (7/29, 24.1%), fracture (5/29, 17.2%), and infection (4/29, 13.7%). The average Visual analog scale decreased from 7 to 3 (P< .001). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score scores improved from a mean of 30 to 58 (P < .001). Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation score scores improved from 26 to 54 (P < .001), and Simple shoulder test improved from 2 to 6 (P = .001). Range of motion in both forward elevation from 76° to 131° (P < .001) and external rotation from 26 to 42 (P = .001). Complications were seen in 10 of 29 patients (34.5%).ConclusionA failed RSA can be managed with revision RSA with acceptable clinical outcomes although outcome is inferior to primary RSA with a high rate of complications.Level of EvidenceLevel IV; Retrospective Case Series     

Prior Nonarthroplasty Surgery Increases Risk of Complication in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundPrior ipsilateral knee surgery may increase the risk for complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It remains unclear if the extent of previous surgery affects those risks disparately. The purpose of this study is to evaluate prior nonarthroplasty bony procedure (BP) and soft tissue only procedure (STP) as a potential risk factor for complications after TKA and determine the association with charges or reimbursement of the primary TKA.MethodsPatients who underwent primary TKA with previous knee surgery were identified using a national Medicare database and matched 1:5 to controls without prior knee surgery. Rates of postoperative medical and surgical complications were calculated in addition to hospital-associated charges and reimbursements. Logistic regression analysis was used to control for confounding factors.ResultsPatients who underwent BP (n = 835) had increased risk of readmission (58.6% vs 45.3%, odds ratio (OR) 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59-1.85, P < .001) and emergency room visits (14.5% vs 10.4%, OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.29-1.61, P = .001). Patients who underwent STP (n = 6766) had increased risk of readmission (58.1% vs 45.2%, OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.64-1.73, P < .001), emergency room visits (12.6% vs 0.7%, OR 1.33, 1.28-1.39, P < .001), revision (1.8% vs 1.4%, OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.21-1.47, P = .006), cerebrovascular accident (2.3% vs 1.7%, OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.22-1.46, P = .002), and venous thromboembolism (3.8% vs 3.2%, OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.29, P = .009). Prior surgery was associated with increased charges and reimbursements.ConclusionPrior ipsilateral knee surgery is associated with significantly increased risks of postoperative complications after primary TKA. Interestingly, previous STP but not BP increased the risk of short-term revision and venous thromboembolism.     

Surgical Helmet Systems Are Associated With a Lower Rate of Prosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Combined Results From the New Zealand Joint Registry and Surgical Site Infection Improvement Programme

BackgroundThis study aimed to identify the risk factors, in particular the use of surgical helmet systems (SHSs), for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Data recorded by the New Zealand Surgical Site Infection Improvement Programme (SSIIP) and the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) were combined and analyzed.MethodsPrimary TKA procedures performed between July 2013 and June 2018 that were recorded by both the SSIIP and NZJR were analyzed. Two primary outcomes were measured: (1) PJI within 90 days as recorded by the SSIIP and (2) revision TKA for deep infection within 6 months as recorded by the NZJR. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for both outcomes with results considered significant at P < .05.ResultsA total of 19,322 primary TKAs were recorded by both databases in which 97 patients had a PJI within 90 days as recorded by the SSIIP (0.50%), and 90 patients had a revision TKA for deep infection within 6 months (0.47%) as recorded by the NZJR. An SHS was associated with a lower rate of PJI (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, P = .008) and revision for deep infection (adjusted OR = 0.55, P = .022) than conventional gowning. Male sex (adjusted OR = 2.6, P < .001) and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score >2 were patient risk factors for infection (OR = 2.63, P < .001 for PJI and OR = 1.75, P = .017 for revision for deep infection).ConclusionUsing contemporary data from the SSIIP and NZJR, the use of the SHS was associated with a lower rate of PJI after primary TKA than conventional surgical gowning. Male sex and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score continue to be risk factors for infection.     

Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection Increases Following Early Aseptic Revision Surgery of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundIt is important to identify risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty in order to mitigate the substantial social and economic burden. The objective of this study is to evaluate early aseptic revision surgery as a potential risk factor for PJI following total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsPatients who underwent primary THA or TKA with early aseptic revision were identified in 2 national insurance databases. Control groups of patients who did not undergo revision were identified and matched 10:1 to study patients. Rates of PJI at 1 and 2 years postoperatively following revision surgery were calculated and compared to controls using a logistic regression analysis.ResultsIn total, 328 Medicare and 222 Humana patients undergoing aseptic revision THA within 1 year of index THA were found to have significantly increased risk of PJI at 1 year (5.49% vs 0.91%, odds ratio [OR] 5.61, P < .001 for Medicare; 7.21% vs 0.68%, OR 11.34, P < .001 for Humana) and 2 years (5.79% vs 1.10%, OR 4.79, P < .001 for Medicare; 8.11% vs 1.04%, OR 9.05, P < .001 for Humana). Similarly for TKA, 190 Medicare and 226 Humana patients who underwent aseptic revision TKA within 1 year were found to have significantly higher rates of PJI at 1 year (6.48% vs 1.16%, OR 7.69, P < .001 for Medicare; 6.19% vs 1.28%, OR 4.89, P < .001 for Humana) and 2 years (8.42% vs 1.58%, OR 6.57, P < .001 for Medicare; 7.08% vs 1.50%, OR 4.50, P < .001 for Humana).ConclusionEarly aseptic revision surgery following THA and TKA is associated with significantly increased risks of subsequent PJI within 2 years.     

Revision Joint Arthroplasty and Renal Transplant: A Matched Control Cohort Study

BackgroundThere is little literature concerning clinical outcomes following revision joint arthroplasty in solid organ transplant recipients. The aims of this study are to (1) analyze postoperative outcomes and mortality following revision hip and knee arthroplasty in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) compared to non-RTRs and (2) characterize common indications and types of revision procedures among RTRs.MethodsA retrospective Medicare database review identified 1020 RTRs who underwent revision joint arthroplasty (359 revision total knee arthroplasty [TKA] and 661 revision total hip arthroplasty [THA]) from 2005 to 2014. RTRs were compared to their respective matched control groups of nontransplant revision arthroplasty patients for hospital length of stay, readmission, major medical complications, infections, septicemia, and mortality following revision.ResultsRenal transplantation was significantly associated with increased length of stay (6.12 ± 7.86 vs 4.33 ± 4.29, P < .001), septicemia (odds ratio [OR], 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.83-3.46; P < .001), and 1-year mortality (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.51-4.53; P < .001) following revision TKA. Among revision THA patients, RTR status was associated with increased hospital readmission (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.47; P = .023), septicemia (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.41-2.34; P < .001), and 1-year mortality (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.88-3.66; P < .001). The most frequent primary diagnoses associated with revision TKA and THA among RTRs were mechanical complications of prosthetic implant.ConclusionPrior renal transplantation among revision joint arthroplasty patients is associated with increased morbidity and mortality when compared to nontransplant recipients.     

Comparison of complication rates in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty performed for degenerative conditions versus proximal humerus fractures

BackgroundIndications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) have been expanding. In addition to degenerative joint disease (DJD), RTSA is now being used to treat proximal humerus fractures (PHF). The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative complications in RTSA performed for DJD versus PHF.MethodsA retrospective analysis of the PearlDiver National Database was performed. International Classification of Diseases 10 codes were used to identify RTSA patients from 2015-2018 and separate them into DJD and PHF cohorts. Demographics, comorbidities, and hospital data were identified and compared using a two-sample t-test and chi-squared test. Systemic complications at 90 days and surgical complications at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years were compared using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsFifteen thousand six hundred seventy eight patients (92.6% DJD, 7.4% PHF) were identified. PHF patients were more likely to be older (70.3 vs. 69.7 years, P = .026), female (83.5% vs. 62.2%, P < .001), and have more medical comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index 3.42 vs. 3.17, P = .006) than DJD patients. After controlling for patient factors, PHF patients were more likely than DJD patients to develop urinary tract infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.65, P < .001), deep vein thrombosis (OR 1.76, P = .024), and hematoma (OR 3.83, P < .001) within 90 days of RTSA. At 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively, RTSA for PHF patients were also more likely than RTSA for DJD patients to sustain a periprosthetic fracture (OR 2.57, P < .001) and instability (OR 2.02, P < .001).ConclusionsPatients with DJD and PHF undergoing RTSA represent different patient populations with distinct postoperative clinical outcomes. RTSA for PHF has inferior outcomes, which is significant in an era of bundled payments.     

Mid-Term Survivorship,Performance, and Predictors of Outcome in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Porous Tantalum Femoral Prosthesis

BackgroundFemoral stem subsidence is a known cause of early implant failure, increasing the risk for aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fracture. Overall survivorship and subsidence in a novel porous tantalum-coated femoral prosthesis have not been well-studied.MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous tantalum-coated femoral prosthesis between January 2008 and January 2015 with minimum 5-year follow-up were included. Clinical and radiographic data were obtained from hospital and office records. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine predictors of subsidence and clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were performed to illustrate primary failure endpoints of (1) all-cause revision and (2) femoral prosthesis revision.ResultsA total of 398 patients with a mean (±standard deviation) age of 61.0 ± 11.5 years, body mass index (BMI) 32.8 ± 8.0 kg/m², and follow-up of 6.9 (range 5.0-11.2 years) were included. Survivorship at 5 years was 94.9% for all-cause revision and 98.0% for femoral component revision. Average subsidence was 1.8 ± 1.3 mm (range 0-15.5), with 8.1% patients experiencing subsidence >5 mm. Statistically significant mean improvements were observed at latest follow-up in the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (40.6 ± 11.5 vs 85.2 ± 10.1, P < .001), Harris Hip Score (38.0 ± 12.0 vs 79.5 ± 12.8, P < .001), and hip flexion (92.8° ± 15.3° vs 103.3° ± 10.3°, P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that greater BMI (odds ratio [OR] 1.17, P < .001), non-white/Caucasian race (OR 2.0, P = .036), and female gender (OR 2.4; P = .005) conferred a higher likelihood of subsidence >3 mm. BMI was a statistically significant and independent predictor of subsidence >5 mm (OR 1.25, P < .001) and subsidence >7 mm (OR 1.25, P < .001).ConclusionThe trabecular metal taper femoral prosthesis conferred excellent clinical outcome improvement and survivorship. Increasing BMI was independently associated with an increased risk of subsidence in these patients and caution is recommended in utilizing this implant in obese, morbidly obese, and super morbidly obese populations.     

Long-Term Wear-Related Complications of Cross-Linked Versus Conventional Polyethylene After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

BackgroundHighly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners have been developed to address the wear-related problems associated with conventional polyethylene (CPE) such as osteolysis or aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this systematic meta-analysis, we compared the long-term efficacy in preventing radiological osteolysis and revision surgery between HXLPE and CPE.MethodsWe included 14 studies that compared HXLPE and CPE reporting the incidence of wear-related complications with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. We investigated 5 wear-related complications: osteolysis, excessive wear, linear wear rate, revision surgery due to wear, and progress of osteolysis/aseptic loosening. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis to estimate odds ratio (OR) and a proportional meta-analysis to estimate the incidence of each complication.ResultsAmong 1,175 THAs, 220 osteolysis and 78 wear-related revisions were detected. The use of HXLPE reduced the risk of overall osteolysis (OR 0.30; P = .001), excessive wear (OR 0.10; P < .001), linear wear rate (weighted mean difference 0.09; P < .001), the risk of overall wear-related revisions (OR 0.06; P < .001), and revisions due to aseptic loosening (OR 0.23; P = .015). As per the proportional meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of osteolysis, excessive wear, and the overall wear-related revision rate were 14%, 8%, and 3% in HXLPE and 25%, 33%, and 20% in CPE, respectively.ConclusionThe current evidence shows that HXLPE dramatically reduced the rate of osteolysis and wear-related revision surgery. However, as polyethylene wear and osteolysis still lead to revision surgery, ongoing clinical and retrieval studies are required to analyze long-term outcomes.     

Iron Deficiency Anemia is Associated with Increased Early Postoperative Surgical and Medical Complications Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundIron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a medical comorbidity commonly diagnosed in those undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The authors sought to evaluate IDA as a risk factor for early postoperative complications following discharge and describe the hospital resource utilization of this patient population.MethodsPatients with a diagnosis of IDA who underwent THA from 2005 to 2014 were identified in a national insurance database. The rates of postoperative medical complications and surgery-related complications, as well as hospital readmission, emergency department visits, and death were calculated. Additionally, 90-day and day of surgery cost and length of stay were calculated. IDA patients were then compared to a 4:1 matched control population without IDA using a logistic regression analysis to control for confounding factors.ResultsIn total, 98,681 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of IDA who underwent THA were identified and compared to 386,724 controls. IDA was associated with increased risk of 30-day emergency department visits (odds ratio [OR] 1.35, P < .001) and 30-day readmission (OR 1.49, P < .001). IDA was also associated with an increased 90-day medical complication rate (cerebrovascular accident OR 1.11, P = .003; urinary tract infection OR 1.14, P < .001; acute renal failure OR 1.24, P < .001; transfusion OR 1.40, P < .001), as well as 1-year periprosthetic joint infection (OR 1.27, P < .001), revision (OR 1.22, P < .001), dislocation (OR 1.25, P < .001), and fracture (OR 1.43, P < .001). Patients with IDA accrued higher hospital charges ($27,658.27 vs $16,709.18, P < .001) and lower hospital reimbursement ($5509.90 vs $3605.59, P < .001).ConclusionPatients with preoperative IDA undergoing THA are at greater risk of experiencing early postoperative complications and have greater utilization of hospital resources.