Docetaxel: a review of its use in non-small cell lung cancer

Docetaxel, a semisynthetic member of the taxoid class of antineoplastic agents, is effective in the treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In noncomparative trials in patients with NSCLC, docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m2 produced objective response rates of 20 to 38% and 14 to 25% as a first-line or second-line monotherapy, respectively. In Japan, docetaxel 60 mg/m2 produced objective response rates of 19 to 25% in previously untreated patients. Docetaxel 100 or 75 mg/m2 produced significantly higher response rates than either vinorelbine or ifosfamide in previously treated patients; patients treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 had an improved 1-year survival rate compared with those who received vinorelbine or ifosfamide. Docetaxel monotherapy in chemotherapy-naive patients produced survival rates that are similar to those reported for most platinum-containing standard combinations such as cisplatin plus vinorelbine. Combination of docetaxel with one other antineoplastic resulted in objective response rates of 20 to 54% in chemotherapy-naive patients; triple chemotherapy combinations produced responses in 51 and 60% of patients. Promising results from a few small studies and one large phase II study have also indicated a potential role for docetaxel as neoadjuvant therapy. The main dose-limiting adverse event associated with docetaxel is neutropenia, and fluid retention is common in many patients. The tolerability profile is generally acceptable in the majority of patients, although extra care has to be taken in patients with impaired liver function to minimise the risk of severe or febrile neutropenia. Conclusions. Docetaxel is generally well tolerated by patients receiving treatment for locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC, and produces response and survival rates equivalent to many current standard treatment options. Comparative studies have shown that docetaxel monotherapy provides significant survival benefits over best supportive care or treatment with vinorelbine or ifosfamide. Response and 1-year survival rates with docetaxel monotherapy are particularly encouraging in patients refractory or resistant to cisplatin or carboplatin, for whom treatment options are few. Neoadjuvant docetaxel has produced improved survival compared with local treatment alone. Combinations of docetaxel with other antineoplastic agents have produced relatively high response and 1-year survival rates; however, further comparative studies are required to confirm these benefits. In the meantime, docetaxel is a welcome addition to the options available for patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Trastuzumab: new indication. Metastatic breast cancer, in combination with docetaxel: promising, but more evaluation is needed

(1) There is no consensus on the optimal chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Patients who have never previously received chemotherapy are generally given an anthracycline-based combination of cytotoxic agents. Options for patients who have already received an anthracycline include a taxane such as paclitaxel or docetaxel. The median survival time with these treatments is only about 2 to 2.5 years. (2) Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against HER-2, a protein overexpressed by certain tumours, including about 25% of breast tumours. In 2000, the approved indications included first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer in combination with paclitaxel. One clinical trial had shown, albeit with a low level of evidence, a median increase in survival of about 4 to 5 months. Trastuzumab is now approved for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, in combination with docetaxel. (3) Evaluation data include the results of an open-label trial comparing docetaxel + trastuzumab with docetaxel monotherapy in 186 patients. The median survival time was significantly longer with the combination (31.2 versus 22.7 months). There are no relevant comparisons with other widely used cytotoxic drugs. Indirect comparison suggests that survival is similar with docetaxel + trastuzumab and paclitaxel + trastuzumab. (4) Data on the trastuzumab-docetaxel combination confirm the known adverse effects of trastuzumab, which include heart failure and diarrhea. Trastuzumab increases the frequency of docetaxel-induced neutropenia, which carries a risk of infections. (5) In summary, the results of clinical trials show that median survival time is increased by a few months when trastuzumab is added to a cytotoxic drug. However, the best cytotoxic agent is not known, and adverse effects are poorly documented. (6) In practice, trastuzumab has only been shown to benefit a minority of women with breast cancer, namely those whose tumours overexpress HER-2. Trastuzumab therapy is an option for metastatic breast cancer treatment, provided patients are enrolled in studies designed to answer the many outstanding questions.     

Gefitinib: a new antineoplastic for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and safety of gefitinib and its role in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer are reviewed. SUMMARY: Gefitinib is indicated for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer who have not responded to chemotherapy with platinum-based regimens or docetaxel. Gefitinib is administered orally at a dosage of 250 mg/day. Peak plasma levels are attained within 3-7 hours and steady-state levels are achieved in 7-8 days. Food does not affect the drug's absorption. Gefitinib is metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme system and may be affected by other drugs that influence this enzyme activity. Its elimination half-life is 14-48 hours. Clinical trials have shown an average response rate of 93% when gefitinib is used as a second- or third-line agent. Median survival with gefitinib therapy is 3-6.6 months. There was no response or survival benefit with the addition of gefitinib to standard two-drug combination chemotherapy regimens in two large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. However, there is some evidence that the combination of gefitinib and docetaxel may be more active than docetaxel alone. Gefitinib has been shown to improve pulmonary symptoms and quality of life in patients who did not have an objective response to treatment. The most common adverse effects are diarrhea and skin rash. Severe interstitial lung disease, which may be fatal, occurs at a rate of approximately 1%. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib is active as a second- or third-line agent in patients who have few therapeutic options available after initial and first-line salvage chemotherapy have failed.     

Docetaxel in non-small cell lung cancer: impact on quality of life and pharmacoeconomics

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in industrialised countries, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for the majority of cases. A large proportion of patients present with advanced disease and are >65 years of age at the time of diagnosis. Systemic chemotherapy may be offered in an effort to improve survival and quality of life (QOL). Chemotherapy with platinum-based compounds has been shown to modestly improve survival and QOL, and is considered the standard of care as first-line treatment in patients with a good performance status. The last decade has seen the emergence of newer generation chemotherapy agents for the treatment of all cancer types. We review the evidence for the use of docetaxel, an antimicrotubular agent, in patients with advanced NSCLC. In this review, we evaluate not only the effects of docetaxel on survival, but also its impact on QOL and economic issues. Docetaxel is a potent anticancer agent with activity both as a single agent or in combination, and is used both as a first- and second-line treatment in advanced NSCLC. The improvements observed in patients' QOL and the cost effectiveness of docetaxel make it a very reasonable choice in older patients with good performance status and advanced disease who are candidates for chemotherapy.     

Combination therapy versus single agent chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

There is proven evidence of improved symptom control with platinum-based chemotherapy in the palliation of non-small cell lung cancer, and small but definite improvements in progression-free and overall survival when compared with best supportive care. The newer chemotherapy agents vinorelbine, gemcitabine, docetaxel and paclitaxel all have single agent activity, and in combination with cisplatin these provide superior quality of life and/or survival compared with the single agents, albeit with some increase in haematological toxicity. Doublet chemotherapy consisting of a new agent combined with platinum, cisplatin by preference where tolerated, has become the standard of care for advanced disease. The use of a functional assessment of fitness, rather than chronological age alone, is appropriate in the treatment of elderly patients. Although in this group there is evidence that doublets are superior to single agents, treatment should be undertaken with caution. In the second line setting where patients are unlikely to tolerate combination therapy, single agents have proven superiority over best supportive care. Patients with poor performance status (PS2) without comorbidity may tolerate combination therapy, but currently available evidence is insufficient to allow a definitive recommendation for combination or single-agent chemotherapy.     

Combination therapy versus single agent chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

There is proven evidence of improved symptom control with platinum-based chemotherapy in the palliation of non-small cell lung cancer, and small but definite improvements in progression-free and overall survival when compared with best supportive care. The newer chemotherapy agents vinorelbine, gemcitabine, docetaxel and paclitaxel all have single agent activity, and in combination with cisplatin these provide superior quality of life and/or survival compared with the single agents, albeit with some increase in haematological toxicity. Doublet chemotherapy consisting of a new agent combined with platinum, cisplatin by preference where tolerated, has become the standard of care for advanced disease. The use of a functional assessment of fitness, rather than chronological age alone, is appropriate in the treatment of elderly patients. Although in this group there is evidence that doublets are superior to single agents, treatment should be undertaken with caution. In the second line setting where patients are unlikely to tolerate combination therapy, single agents have proven superiority over best supportive care. Patients with poor performance status (PS2) without comorbidity may tolerate combination therapy, but currently available evidence is insufficient to allow a definitive recommendation for combination or single-agent chemotherapy.     

The chemotherapy of head and neck cancer

Studies of combination therapy [with agents such as cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and methotrexate] have shown some improvements in response rate; however, no obvious survival advantage over monotherapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic or advanced locoregional cancer of the head and neck have been observed. In the neoadjuvant setting, chemotherapy is helpful in preserving the larynx and hypopharynx but has no proven impact (positive or negative) on survival. New treatment options are needed to improve survival in head and neck cancer. Among the new options for chemotherapy in metastatic/recurrent disease is docetaxel. With monotherapy, response rates of 23-42% are seen, and, when used in combination with cisplatin and 5-FU, response rates of 52-100% have been reported in phase I/II trials. A phase III trial of the addition of docetaxel to standard neoadjuvant therapy with cisplatin and 5-FU is now underway.     

Novel therapeutic strategies following docetaxel-based chemotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer

Prolonged survival of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer has been demonstrated following treatment with a combination of docetaxel and prednisone. This combination has, therefore, become the standard first-line chemotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Median survival, however, does not exceed 20 months and there are currently no approved second-line treatments for patients who progress after docetaxel treatment. The development of effective and safe treatment strategies is urgently required. Several clinical trials are currently evaluating the use of cytotoxic, antiandrogenic and molecular targeting agents. Preclinical studies are identifying the mechanisms responsible for docetaxel resistance and means of enhancing docetaxel activity. The results of these studies will provide the basis for rationally designed therapeutic approaches. This article summarizes the results of recent preclinical and clinical studies and discusses future perspectives.     

Issues involved in research into the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer

Randomized studies have failed to find convincing evidence that neo-adjuvant chemotherapy results in improved overall survival. This may be related to limited efficacy of the regimens used. A sequence of an anthracycline-based primary chemotherapy followed by docetaxel has shown promising results which are briefly discussed. The assessment of the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy should be based on the evaluation of pathological response and a simple, reproducible method of grading differential response would be of great value. Positive identification of tumor stroma is essential in defining pathological complete response (pCR). This paper presents a grading scheme based purely on microscopic assessment which classifies patients into five groups with significantly different disease-free and overall survival. A system dividing patients into only two groups, i.e. those with pCR or those with any evidence of invasive tumor, may lose information of prognostic value. Assessing the response of metastatic disease in the lymph nodes, as well as response of the primary tumor, may further refine our ability to identify those patients likely to gain most from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.     

Clinical advances with topoisomerase I inhibitors in gastrointestinal malignancies

Phase III studies have shown irinotecan prolongs survival significantly when compared with either best supportive care or best infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy in patients with 5-FU-resistant colorectal cancer. Phase I/II studies are investigating the combination of irinotecan with 5-FU, with thymidylate synthase inhibitors, notably raltitrexed, and with the oral fluoropyrimidines. Preliminary results suggest irinotecan and raltitrexed can safely be combined in the clinic and that this combination is active. The combination of irinotecan with the oral fluoropyrimidines also has produced promising results. A phase I study of irinotecan plus 5-FU/folinic acid showed high activity in first-line metastatic disease and further trials using the doses of 80 mg/m2 irinotecan plus 2 g 5-FU weekly are recommended. The combination of irinotecan with the De Gramont 5-FU regimen is feasible and active in patients with 5-FU-resistant metastatic disease. Alternating exposure to irinotecan and 5-FU may be as active as either treatment alone, and has been associated with overall response rates (ORRs) greater than 30% and encouraging median survival. The combination of irinotecan with oxaliplatin is also feasible and levels of response rates are in the region of 50% (especially with a 2-weekly administration schedule). In patients with advanced gastric cancer (including those with pretreated disease) ORRs of around 50% have been reported following administration of either cisplatin plus irinotecan or cisplatin plus docetaxel.     

Doxetaxel: new indication. Prostate cancer: a few more weeks

(1) The standard treatment for metastatic prostate cancer is hormone therapy, based on medical castration (with an LH-RH agonist) or surgical castration (pulpectomy), possibly combined with an androgen antagonist. For patients with hormone-resistant disease the only cytotoxic agents approved in France, estramustine and mitoxantrone, have no proven impact on survival. (2) Docetaxel is now approved in Europe for the treatment of hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer, in combination with a steroid. (3) In an open-label comparative trial involving 1006 patients, docetaxel infusion at a dose of 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, in combination with prednisone (or prednisolone), significantly extended the median survival time by about 2.5 months as compared with a mitoxantrone-prednisone combination (18.9 versus 16.5 months). In another open-label comparative trial involving 674 patients, a combination of docetaxel + estramustine was significantly more effective than a mitoxantrone + prednisone combination in extending median survival time (17.5 versus 15.6 months). (4) The adverse effects of docetaxel + prednisone were the same as those seen with other indications (hair loss, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, neutropenia, nail disorders, neuropathies), and were severe in 25% of patients. (5) In France the cost of docetaxel therapy for hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer is more than 1000 euros every three weeks. (6) In practice, docetaxel is the first cytotoxic agent shown to prolong survival in men with hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. The benefit is limited, however, especially given the potentially severe adverse effects of docetaxel, which must be disclosed to patients.     

Capecitabine: new indication. In breast cancer: inadequately assessed

There is no consensus on treatment of locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer after failure of first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy. Common options are continuous infusion of a taxane (docetaxel or paclitaxel), vinorelbine or fluorouracil. Capecitabine is now licensed for use in breast cancer, both in combination with IV docetaxel after anthracycline failure, and as single-agent therapy after failure of anthracyclines and taxanes. The clinical evaluation dossier on capecitabine fails to answer the most important questions about comparative efficacy and safety. In second-line treatment, after anthracycline failure, the only available comparative trial showed that the capecitabine + docetaxel combination increased median survival time by about three months relative to placebo + docetaxel, but caused more adverse events. There are no trials comparing capecitabine with other options. There is no evidence that capecitabine increases the length or quality of survival, relative to intravenous vinorelbine, in women with breast cancer that is resistant to both anthracyclines and taxanes. The classical adverse effects of capecitabine are also observed in women with breast cancer, namely palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia, diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, and major hyperbilirubinemia. Capecitabine can be taken by mouth and this may be an advantage. However, current evidence is too limited to justify using capecitabine outside of clinical trials.     

Innovative treatments for

Lung cancer remains the most frequent and most lethal cancer worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises the vast majority of the histological types. Surgery remains the standard therapy for early stage disease but for advanced stage disease, modern treatment is unsatisfactory. However, during the past ten years, improvements in response and survival have been seen with the use of newer chemotherapy regimens. Early studies of neo-adjuvant (pre-operative) chemotherapy for resectable stage III patients have shown promising results. For patients with non-resectable NSCLC platinum-based doublets are now established as first-line treatment, either alone or in combination with radiotherapy. Innovative non-platinum based combinations are actively being evaluated. The most promising non-platinum agents at this time include gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, irinotecan and vinorelbine. These agents appear to be effective as single agents and in combinations and also have improved toxicity profiles. Several other systemic approaches are under active evaluation; the most promising areas include anti-angiogenesis agents, immunotoxins, interleukins, vaccines and molecular therapy.     

Trastuzumab-based combination therapy for breast cancer

Trastuzumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody directed against the extracellular domain of HER-2, has been shown to be active against HER-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer, either as single agent or when used in combination with chemotherapy. In preclinical models, trastuzumab has shown additive and even synergistic anti-tumour activity with the most active chemotherapeutic agents used in the treatment of breast cancer. In a large, randomised, Phase III trial, the combination of trastuzumab plus chemotherapy was shown to improve response rate and survival. The high incidence of cardiotoxicity seen with the combination of trastuzumab plus anthracycline drugs prompted carrying out of several clinical studies combining trastuzumab with other chemotherapeutic agents, including docetaxel, vinorelbine, platinum salts, gemcitabine and capecitabine. This article summarises the available data on trastuzumab-based combinations for breast cancer.     

New options in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

The options for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were expanded by the introduction of the taxanes. As a single agent, docetaxel produced response rates ranging from 15 to 22% in evaluable patients in the second-line setting, with median duration of responses ranging from 5.6 to 7.5 months. To confirm the results observed in the phase II studies, a phase III trial was conducted. Three-hundred and seventy-three patients with advanced NSCLC who had failed prior platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized to receive docetaxel 100 mg/m2, docetaxel 75 mg/m2 or a reference arm consisting of vinorelbine or ifosfamide. Efficacy, safety and quality of life (using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale) were assessed. Data from this study are forthcoming and may confirm the benefits provided by the inclusion of docetaxel in the second-line treatment of NSCLC. Docetaxel is also an active single agent in the first-line setting, with response rates ranging from 24 to 38% in evaluable patients, with a median survival of 6-13 months. Based on the single-agent activity, it was logical to evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel in combination with other active agents. As such, docetaxel has been studied in with numerous other agents such as vinorelbine, gemcitabine, platinums, etc. Notably cisplatin and carboplatin has shown promising rates of response and response duration in phase II trials. These combinations have now entered randomized phase III study.     

A Novel Use of Olaparib for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration‐Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Although mortality from prostate cancer has declined over the past 20 years as a result of early detection and treatment, the 5‐year survival rate for men with prostate cancer who develop metastatic disease is only 29%. Current treatment options for metastatic castration‐recurrent prostate cancer (mCRPC) are associated with toxicity and a limited durable response; therefore, additional lines of efficacious and minimally toxic therapy are needed. Olaparib, a poly(adenosine 5′‐diphosphate) ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, received a U.S. Food and Drug Administration breakthrough therapy designation in January 2016 for the treatment of patients with BRCA1/2 or ATM gene‐mutated mCRPC based on results of a compelling phase II trial of olaparib in patients with advanced castration‐resistant prostate cancer (TOPARP‐A). This study found that men with mCRPC and genetic mutations in DNA damage repair genes had an overall response rate of nearly 90% with olaparib treatment. In this review, we describe current therapies for mCRPC, the rationale for anti‐PARP therapies, the pharmacology of olaparib for prostate cancer, clinical trials of olaparib for mCRPC, our clinical experience with olaparib for prostate cancer at a comprehensive cancer center, and future directions of olaparib for the treatment of mCRPC. Olaparib may constitute a promising treatment to prolong survival in patients with mCRPC, with an acceptable adverse effect profile. As the role of PARP inhibition in prostate cancer and other malignancies becomes further elucidated, olaparib may be shown to be beneficial for other patient populations.     

Docetaxel: a review of its use for the first-line treatment of advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer

Docetaxel (Taxotere?) is a well established anti-mitotic chemotherapy agent. Among other therapeutic indications, docetaxel plus prednisone is indicated for first-line chemotherapy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Docetaxel every 3 weeks plus continuous prednisone has been standard first-line chemotherapy in CRPC since demonstrating improved survival compared with the previous standard regimen, mitoxantrone plus prednisone, in the phase III TAX 327 trial in 2004. Since that time, docetaxel has been combined with various agents that demonstrated additive or synergistic activity in preclinical studies in an effort to further improve outcomes, but to date, overall survival has not been extended compared with docetaxel plus prednisone. However, several promising agents are emerging with a potential role in docetaxel-based combinations based on efficacy and manageable toxicity, including bevacizumab, dasatinib and atrasentan. In the TAX 327 trial, neutropenia was relatively common in the group receiving 3-weekly docetaxel plus prednisone, but infection was rare. The tolerability of a weekly docetaxel regimen also administered in this trial was not significantly different to that of the 3-weekly regimen, except for a lower incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. However, weekly or 2-weekly docetaxel administration schedules may have a place in very elderly or frail patients in order to improve tolerability compared with the 3-weekly regimen. In conclusion, docetaxel every 3 weeks plus prednisone remains the optimum first-line chemotherapy for most patients with advanced CRPC until such time that ongoing research with docetaxel and emerging therapeutic agents can demonstrate improved survival.     

Docetaxel (taxotere) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Docetaxel is a new semi-synthetic anticancer agent derived from bacatin III of the needles of the European yew Taxus baccata. Docetaxel has a novel mechanism of action since it binds to tubulin inducing its polymerization and promoting stable microtubule formation. Several differences exist between docetaxel and paclitaxel: (i) broader activity of docetaxel against freshly explanted human tumors than paclitaxel; (ii) a 2-fold higher affinity than paclitaxel; (iii) 2.5-fold more potent than paclitaxel as an inhibitor of cell replication and (iv) docetaxel acts at the S-phase whereas paclitaxel at the G(2)/M phases of the cell cycle. Preclinical and phase II studies revealed that docetaxel is active against NSCLC. In chemotherapy-na ve patients with NSCLC response rates ranged from 19% to 54% with a median duration of survival ranging from 6.3 months to 11 months, and 1-year survival ranging from 21% to 71%. Docetaxel as single agent provided a survival as well as a clinical benefit over BSC in untreated patients with NSCLC. Docetaxel has been efficiently combined with cisplatin (ORR 33%-46%), carboplatin (ORR 30%-48%), vinorelbine (ORR 20%-51%), gemcitabine (ORR 37%-47%), with a median survival ranging from 5-14 months. A preliminary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial comparing docetaxel/CDDP with docetaxel/gemcitabine revealed that the two regimens had comparable activity in terms, of response rates, duration of response, TTP and overall survival; however, the docetaxel/gemcitabine combination has a most favourable toxicity profile compared to docetaxel/CDDP. Docetaxel has also demonstrated radiosensitizing properties and encouraging results have been achieved in combination with irradiation. Finally, docetaxel has shown an important activity in previously-treated patients with NSCLC with ORR ranging from 16% to 25% with a median survival ranging from 7.2 months to 10.5 months. Randomized trials revealed that second-line docetaxel confers a survival benefit over either BSC or ifosfamide/vinorelbine in pretreated patients with NSCLC.     

Which drug combination for hormone-refractory prostate cancer?

Patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer have a progressive disease with a median survival of approximately 11 months, and currently no treatment offers a survival advantage. The standard drug treatment is a corticosteroid and chemotherapy with mitoxantrone. In a comparison of docetaxel every 3 weeks and prednisone, versus mitoxantrone and prednisone, with a follow-up of approximately 21 months, there were less deaths in the docetaxel group than in the mitoxantrone group (166 of 335 patients and 201 of 337 patients, respectively). Docetaxel also prolonged the duration of survival compared with mitoxantrone (18.9 and 16.5 months, respectively). When given with prednisone, docetaxel was also shown to reduce pain and serum prostate specific antigen levels and improve quality of life compared with mitoxantrone/prednisone. In another trial in hormone-resistant prostate cancer patients, which compared docetaxel and estramustine with mitoxantrone and prednisone during a median follow-up of 32 months, there were fewer deaths with docetaxel/estramustine than with mitoxantrone/prednisone, which were 217 of 338 and 235 of 336 patients, respectively. Median survival was also longer in the docetaxel and estramustine group than in the mitoxantrone/prednisone group (17.5 and 15.6 months, respectively). In conclusion, two combinations (docetaxel/prednisone and docetaxel/estramustine) have been shown to be superior to mitoxantrone/prednisone in hormone-refractory prostate cancer and both should be considered for use. With the present information, there is little to distinguish between these combinations.     

The current status of docetaxel for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Docetaxel is an active single agent in both first- and second-line therapy of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Randomized trials versus best supportive care have documented an improvement in overall survival for docetaxel therapy in both settings. Docetaxel also produced a significant 1-year survival rate improvement when compared with vinorelbine or ifosfamide as second-line therapy. Docetaxel has been extensively investigated in phase I/II studies in combination with cisplatin, carboplatin, irinotecan and gemcitabine. Substantial activity has been demonstrated. In a randomized phase II trial comparing docetaxel plus cisplatin with docetaxel plus gemcitabine, the efficacy of the two regimens was almost identical (response rates 32 and 34%; 1-year survival rates 42 and 38%). However, the combination of docetaxel with gemcitabine was associated with significantly less grade III/IV neutropenia, diarrhea and nausea/vomiting. Three drug regimens combining docetaxel with, for example, gemcitabine and carboplatin or with ifosfamide and cisplatin, are producing very high response rates in phase II trials. Whether three-drug combinations including docetaxel will result in an improved outcome for patients with advanced NSCLC remains to be determined.