Increased coronary vascular resistance cannot be reduced by inhibiting sympathetic overactivity in hypertension

The aim of this study was to test whether increased coronary vascular resistance in hypertensive subjects can be reduced by centrally inhibiting sympathetic overactivity with dexamethasone. Coronary vascular resistance was quantitated in 11 men with untreated mild essential hypertension (RR 149 +/- 13/98 +/- 10 mm Hg) and 23 healthy, normotensive, otherwise matched men using positron emission tomography and [(15)O]H(2)O. The measurements were performed at baseline and during adenosine stimulation. Each subject was studied twice, with and without previous dexamethasone treatment for two days (0.5 mg x 4 per day). Before dexamethasone treatment, cardiac index and plasma norepinephrine concentration (1.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.5 nmol/l, p < 0.01) were significantly higher in hypertensive than in normotensive subjects. Additionally, both baseline and hyperemic coronary vascular resistances were higher in hypertensive than normotensive subjects (147 +/- 31 vs. 113 +/- 24 and 36 +/- 9 vs. 25 +/- 10 mm Hg.min.g.ml(-1); p < 0.05). Dexamethasone treatment significantly decreased plasma norepinephrine concentrations in hypertensive subjects, leading to comparable plasma norepinephrine concentrations in hypertensive and normotensive subjects (1.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.4 nmol/l; NS). However, coronary vascular resistances remained increased in hypertensive subjects. In conclusion, hypertensive subjects are characterized by sympathetic overactivity, which can be normalized by dexamethasone. However, coronary vascular resistances remained increased in hypertensive subjects after dexamethasone treatment, suggesting that other mechanisms than sympathetic overactivity-induced vasoconstriction explain the increased coronary vascular resistance in hypertension.     

Comparison of effects of enalapril and nitrendipine on cardiac sympathetic nervous system in essential hypertension

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of enalapril and nitrendipine on the cardiac sympathetic nervous system.Background. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and long-acting calcium channel blockers have been widely used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, in some of which sympathetic overactivity plays a major role in the pathophysiology and prognosis. However, little information is available on the effects of these drugs on the cardiac sympathetic nervous system.Methods. ¹²³I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) cardiac imaging was performed before and 3 months after drug administration in 46 patients with mild essential hypertension. Twenty-two patients were treated with 5 to 10 mg of enalapril once a day, and the other 24 with 5 to 10 mg of nitrendipine once a day. For comparison, 20 normotensive subjects were also studied.Results. There were no significant differences between the basal characteristics in the 2 hypertensive groups. In both hypertensive groups, both systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly reduced to similar levels after the 3-month drug treatment. Before the drug treatment, the 2 hypertensive groups had a significantly higher washout rate and lower MIBG uptake than the normotensive subjects. The heart-to-mediastinum ratio significantly increased (p < 0.0001), with decreased (p < 0.002) washout rate after drug treatment in the enalapril group, but with no significant changes in the nitrendipine group.Conclusion. Enalapril could suppress cardiac sympathetic activity and nitrendipine had no effect on it. The knowledge of antihypertensive drugs on the cardiac sympathetic nervous system appears to be helpful in selecting appropriate treatment in cardiovascular diseases.     

Effects of Calcium Channel Antagonists on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Diastolic Function in Patients with Essential Hypertension

Hypertensive patients characteristically exhibit left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction. The effects of antihypertensive agents on LV hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction do not always correlate with the degree of blood pressure reduction, but their effects on the sympathetic nervous system and renin–angiotensin system (RA system) are thought to be important. We investigated the effects of amlodipine and cilnidipine, N‐ and L‐type calcium channel antagonists that suppress both blood pressure elevation and sympathetic activities, on LV hypertrophy and diastolic function. Patients with essential hypertension were randomly assigned to receive either amlodipine, cilnidipine or nifedipine CR (which does not block N‐type calcium channels) for 6 months. The LV mass index was determined using M‐mode echocardiography. The E/A ratio, i.e., the ratio of maximum amplitude between the early diastolic wave (E wave) and the atrial systolic wave (A wave) in the LV inflow pattern, and the deceleration time for the E wave were determined using pulse Doppler echocardiography. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures significantly decreased from the baseline values in all three groups, with no significant differences among the groups. The LV mass index had significantly decreased when it was evaluated 3 months after the initiation of treatment in the cilnidipine group and when it was evaluated 6 months after the initiation of treatment in the amlodipine group; only a slight decrease was observed in the nifedipine CR group. A significant decrease in the deceleration time and a significant increase in the E/A ratio were observed after 3 months of treatment in the cilnidipine and amlodipine groups but not in the nifedipine CR group. Thus, the effects of long‐acting calcium channel antagonists on hypertensive LV hypertrophy and LV diastolic function varied from one antagonist to the other. Left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic function improved in the cilnidipine and amlodipine groups, but not in the nifedipine CR group. These results indicate that the suppression of sympathetic nerve activity by the blockade of N‐type calcium channels contributes to the improvement of LV hypertrophy and diastolic function.     

Sympathetic augmentation in hypertension: role of nerve firing, norepinephrine reuptake, and Angiotensin neuromodulation

There is growing evidence that essential hypertension is commonly neurogenic and is initiated and sustained by sympathetic nervous system overactivity. Potential mechanisms include increased central sympathetic outflow, altered norepinephrine (NE) neuronal reuptake, diminished arterial baroreflex dampening of sympathetic nerve traffic, and sympathetic neuromodulation by angiotensin II. To address this issue, we used microneurography and radiotracer dilution methodology to measure regional sympathetic activity in 22 hypertensive patients and 11 normotensive control subjects. The NE transport inhibitor desipramine was infused to directly assess the potential role of impaired neuronal NE reuptake. To evaluate possible angiotensin sympathetic neuromodulation, the relation of arterial and coronary sinus plasma concentrations of angiotensin II to sympathetic activity was investigated. Hypertensive patients displayed increased muscle sympathetic nerve activity and elevated total systemic, cardiac, and renal NE spillover. Cardiac neuronal NE reuptake was decreased in hypertensive subjects. In response to desipramine, both the reduction of fractional transcardiac 3[H]NE extraction and the increase in cardiac NE spillover were less pronounced in hypertensive patients. DNA sequencing analysis of the NE transporter gene revealed no mutations that could account for reduced transporter activity. Arterial baroreflex control of sympathetic nerve traffic was not diminished in hypertensive subjects. Angiotensin II plasma concentrations were similar in both groups and were not related to indexes of sympathetic activation. Increased rates of sympathetic nerve firing and reduced neuronal NE reuptake both contribute to sympathetic activation in hypertension, whereas a role for dampened arterial baroreflex restraint on sympathetic nerve traffic and a peripheral neuromodulating influence of angiotensin II appear to be excluded.     

Improvement of insulin resistance by troglitazone ameliorates cardiac sympathetic nervous dysfunction in patients with essential hypertension

BACKGROUND: It was recently suggested that insulin resistance is significantly correlated with activation of the cardiac sympathetic nervous system in patients with essential hypertension. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of troglitazone, an agent used to treat insulin resistance, on cardiac sympathetic nervous dysfunction and insulin resistance in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: The study participants included 34 patients (14 men, 20 women) with mild essential hypertension and 17 normal controls (group C, seven men). The patients were randomly divided into two groups, one treated with 400 mg troglitazone and antihypertensive drugs (group T, n = 17) and the other treated with antihypertensive drugs only (group N, n = 17). We evaluated insulin resistance and cardiac sympathetic nervous function before and after 6 months of treatment. Insulin resistance was evaluated using steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG; mg/dl) concentrations and cardiac sympathetic nervous function was evaluated using the heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H : M) and mean washout rate measured by 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) cardiac imaging. RESULTS: There were significant differences in SSPG (P < 0.01), early (P < 0.05) and delayed (P < 0.05) phases of H : M and washout rate (P < 0.05) between the hypertensive patients and group C. The SSPG concentration was significantly improved after treatment only in group T, from 153.3 to 123.7 mg/dl (P < 0.01). The early and delayed phases of H : M and washout rate also were significantly improved (P < 0.05) (from 2.59 to 2.63, from 2.12 to 2.27 and from 18.1 to 13.7%, respectively) in only group T.The change in SSPG was significantly correlated with the changes in H : M and washout rate (r = -0.639 and 0.577, respectively). CONCLUSION: Troglitazone had a beneficial effect on cardiac sympathetic nervous function through a decrease in insulin resistance in patients with essential hypertension.     

Cardiopulmonary reflex before and after regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension

Studies that have examined the cardiopulmonary receptor control of circulation in hypertension have produced conflicting results. In 10 normotensive subjects and in age-matched essential hypertensive subjects without (n = 10) or with left ventricular hypertrophy (n = 12), as well as in seven subjects of the latter group restudied after 1 year of treatment that induced regression of cardiac hypertrophy, we examined the cardiopulmonary reflex by increasing central venous pressure and stimulating cardiopulmonary receptors through passive leg raising and by reducing central venous pressure and deactivating cardiopulmonary receptors through nonhypotensive lower body negative pressure. Reflex responses were measured as changes in forearm vascular resistance (mean blood pressure divided by plethysmographically measured blood flow), plasma norepinephrine concentration, and plasma renin activity. In hypertensive subjects without left ventricular hypertrophy, stimulation and deactivation of cardiopulmonary receptors caused changes in forearm vascular resistance, norepinephrine concentration, and plasma renin activity that were modestly reduced as compared with those in normotensive subjects. However, all these changes were markedly reduced in hypertensive subjects with left ventricular hypertrophy. Following regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, the changes in vascular resistance, plasma norepinephrine, and plasma renin activity induced by cardiopulmonary receptor manipulation all improved markedly. These results demonstrate that cardiopulmonary receptor regulation of peripheral vascular resistance and of neurohumoral variables is impaired in essential hypertension and that the impairment is much more pronounced when this condition is associated with cardiac structural alterations. Therapeutic regression of these alterations, however, leads to a marked improvement of this reflex, with consequent favorable effects on circulatory homeostasis.     

Cilnidipine, but not amlodipine, ameliorates osteoporosis in ovariectomized hypertensive rats through inhibition of the N-type calcium channel

Both osteoporosis and high blood pressure are major diseases in aging populations. Recent studies demonstrated that some antihypertensive drugs reduced the risk of bone fracture in elderly patients. Although calcium channel blockers (CCB) are widely used as first-line antihypertensive agents, there is no evidence that they prevent osteoporosis. In this study, we investigated the effects of two types of CCB on bone metabolism: cilnidipine (L-/N-type CCB), which suppresses norepinephrine release from the sympathetic nerve, and amlodipine (L-type CCB). In ovariectomized female spontaneous hypertensive rats, administration of cilnidipine, but not amlodipine, resulted in a significant increase in the ratio of alkaline phosphatase to tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and a decrease in the number of osteoclasts, as assessed by TRAP staining in the proximal tibia. Bone mineral density, moreover, was significantly higher in the cilnidipine group as compared with the amlodipine group and was associated with a significant decrease in a urinary collagen degradation product (deoxypyridinoline). The degree of prevention of osteoporosis by cilnidipine was similar to that of carvedilol (a β-blocker) because β-blockers reduce fracture risks though the inhibition of osteoclast activation. Interestingly, these effects cannot be attributed to the reduction of blood pressure because all three drugs significantly decreased blood pressure. In contrast, both cilnidipine and carvedilol, but not amlodipine, significantly decreased heart rate, indicating that both cilnidipine and carvedilol suppressed sympathetic nervous activity. Overall, our present data showed that cilnidipine (L-/N-type CCB) ameliorated osteoporosis in ovariectomized hypertensive rats. These pleiotropic effects of antihypertensive drugs such as cilnidipine and carvedilol might provide additional benefits in the treatment of hypertensive postmenopausal women.     

Effect of changes in body posture on vasoactive hormones in pre-eclamptic women

The aim of this study was to determine the normality or otherwise of neurohormone indices, particularly the sympathetic nervous system, in pre-eclamptic patients and document whether changes in body posture magnify any differences between pre-eclamptic and normal women. We studied 11 women with pre-eclampsia and compared them with 17 matched normotensive pregnant women and eight nonpregnant women. Measurements of arterial pressure, heart rate and neurohormones were carried out with subjects in the left lateral position, then supine, left lateral, with upright posture and finally with assumption of the left lateral position again. Main outcome measures were arterial pressure, heart rate and hormones (plasma norepinephrine, renin activity, natriuretic peptides and endothelin-1). We observed that plasma norepinephrine levels were higher in pre-eclamptic than normotensive pregnant women and this was most obvious in the upright position. Plasma renin activity was likewise higher in pre-eclamptic than normotensive pregnant women, again most obvious with upright posture. Plasma natriuretic peptides and endothelin-1 levels were similar in pre-eclamptics and normotensive pregnant women. These data strengthen the premise that pre-eclampsia is associated with sympathetic overactivity as reflected by plasma norepinephrine levels, most obviously observed in the upright position.     

Beneficial Effects of L‐ and N‐type Calcium Channel Blocker on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism and Renal Function in Patients with Hypertension and Type II Diabetes Mellitus

It has been proved that cilnidipine has N‐type calcium channels inhibitory activity as well as L‐type calcium channels and inhibits excessive release of norepinephrine from the sympathetic nerve ending. This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of amlodipine (an inhibitor of L‐type calcium channels) and cilnidipine (an inhibitor of both L‐type and N‐type calcium channels) in patients with hypertension and type II diabetes mellitus. Seventy‐seven hypertensive patients were divided into two groups according to presence/absence of type II diabetes mellitus. In these two groups of patients, the effects of amlodipine and cilnidipine on glucose and lipid metabolism and renal function were compared. As for glucose and lipid metabolism, homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA‐R) level in the non‐diabetic group and triglyceride in the diabetes group were significantly lower with cilnidipine than with amlodipine. As regards renal function in the diabetic group, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly higher and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio was significantly lower with cilnidipine than with amlodipine. Cilnidipine which inhibits N‐type calcium channels is more useful for patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus from its effects on glucose and lipid metabolism and renal function.     

Plasma prolactin, renin and catecholamines in young normotensive and borderline hypertensive subjects

It has been reported that patients with essential hypertension have high plasma prolactin levels and suggested that reduced central dopaminergic activity may be a factor in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension. This study examines the influence of posture on plasma prolactin, plasma catecholamines, plasma renin activity, blood pressure and heart rate in 24 patients with borderline hypertension (age 19 +/- 1 years) and 20 normotensive subjects matched for age and body mass index. Supine plasma prolactin levels were similar in both groups [borderline hypertension, 11.3 +/- 0.7 ng/ml; normotensive, 10.7 +/- 0.8 ng/ml (mean +/- s.e.m.)] and no increase in plasma prolactin was observed after 10 min standing in both groups. Normotensive and borderline hypertensive subjects had similar values for supine and upright plasma renin activity and plasma norepinephrine. There were no significant correlations between supine plasma prolactin and supine blood pressure, supine plasma renin activity or plasma norepinephrine when data from both normotensive and borderline hypertensive subjects were combined. These results may provide indirect evidence against the occurrence of reduced central dopaminergic activity in borderline hypertension.     

Effect of essential hypertension on cardiac autonomic function in type 2 diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of essential hypertension on cardiac autonomic function in type 2 diabetic patients. BACKGROUND: Hypertension is common in type 2 diabetic patients and is associated with a high mortality. However, the combined effects of type 2 diabetes and essential hypertension on cardiac autonomic function have not been fully elucidated. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with type 2 diabetes were assigned to a hypertensive diabetic group (n = 15; age: 56 +/- 8 years, mean +/- SD) or an age-matched normotensive diabetic group (n = 18, 56 +/- 6 years). Cardiac autonomic function was assessed by baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), heart rate variability (HRV), plasma norepinephrine concentration and cardiac 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphic findings. RESULTS: Baroreflex sensitivity was lower in the hypertensive diabetic group than it was in the normotensive diabetic group (p < 0.05). The early and delayed myocardial uptake of 123I-MIBG was lower (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively), and the percent washout rate of 123I-MIBG was higher (p < 0.05) in the hypertensive diabetic group. However, the high frequency (HF) power and the ratio of low frequency (LF) power to HF power (LF/HF) of HRV and plasma norepinephrine concentration were not significantly different. The homeostasis model assessment index was higher in the hypertensive diabetic group than it was in the normotensive diabetic group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that essential hypertension acts synergistically with type 2 diabetes to depress cardiac reflex vagal and sympathetic function, and the results also suggest that insulin resistance may play a pathogenic role in these processes.     

Cilnidipine more highly attenuates cold pressor stress-induced platelet activation in hypertension than does amlodipine.

The clinical significance of N-type calcium channel blockade has not been fully examined. We here compared the effects of the N-type calcium channel blockers cilnidipine and amlodipine on the sympathetic nervous system and platelet function in hypertension under resting and stressed conditions. Thirty-two patients with hypertension (58+/-9 years) received cilnidipine or amlodipine for 4 weeks in this crossover study. On day 28 of each treatment, plasma levels of epinephrine (EP), norepinephrine (NEP), and beta-thromboglobulin (BTG), and EC50 of ADP-induced platelet aggregation (ADPE50) were determined at rest and after a cold pressor test. On day 29, the group receiving cilnidipine was switched to amlodipine treatment, and vice versa. At rest, the blood pressure, heart rates, EP, NEP, ADPEC50, and BTG, were similar in both treatments. After the cold pressor test, increases in EP (35+/-17 to 44+/-25 pg/ml; p<0.05) and BTG (40+/-13 to 49+/-22 ng/ml; p<0.01) and a decrease in ADPEC50 (32+/-26 to 27+/-24 micromol; p<0.05) were observed in the amlodipine treatment, but not in the cilnidipine treatment. In addition, the increase in NEP was significantly greater (p<0.05) in the amlodipine (276+/-78 to 318+/-87 pg/ml; p<0.01) than in the cilnidipine treatment (273+/-88 to 291+/-100 pg/ml; p<0.05). Cilnidipine more highly attenuates the activation of platelet function in response to cold pressor stress than does amlodipine. Attenuated activation of the sympathetic nervous system via N-type calcium channel blockade may contribute to this phenomenon.     

Decreased pituitary response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in young lean male patients with essential hypertension

Essential hypertension is associated with changes in central catecholaminergic pathways which might also be reflected in the pituitary response to stress stimuli. The aim of this study was to determine whether the response of pituitary hormones, cortisol, plasma renin activity, aldosterone and catecholamines to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia is changed in hypertension. We studied 22 young lean male patients with newly diagnosed untreated essential hypertension and 19 healthy normotensive, age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls. All subjects underwent an insulin tolerance test (0.1 IU insulin/kg body weight intravenously) with blood sampling before and 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min after insulin administration. Increased baseline levels of norepinephrine (P<0.05), increased response of norepinephrine (P<0.001) and decreased response of growth hormone (P<0.001), prolactin (P<0.001), adrenocorticotropic hormone (P<0.05) and cortisol (P<0.001) were found in hypertensive patients when compared to normotensive controls. Increased norepinephrine levels and a decreased pituitary response to metabolic stress stimuli may represent another manifestation of chronically increased sympathetic tone in early hypertension.     

L/N-type calcium channel blocker cilnidipine reduces plasma aldosterone, albuminuria, and urinary liver-type fatty acid binding protein in patients with chronic kidney disease

Cilnidipine inhibits both L- and N-type calcium channels and has been shown to dilate efferent arterioles as effectively as afferent arterioles. We conducted an open-label, randomized trial to compare the effects of cilnidipine against those of amlodipine on blood pressure (BP), albuminuria, and plasma aldosterone concentration in hypertensive patients with mild- to moderate-stage chronic kidney disease. Patients with BP ≥130/80 mmHg, an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 90–30 ml/min/1.73 m², and albuminuria ≥30 mg/g, despite treatment with the maximum recommended dose of angiotensin II receptor blockers, were randomly assigned to two groups. Patients received either 10 mg/day cilnidipine (increased to 20 mg/day; n = 35) or 2.5 mg/day amlodipine (increased to 5 mg/day; n = 35). After 48 weeks of treatment, a significant and comparable reduction in systolic and diastolic BP was observed in both groups. The percent reduction in the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio and liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP) in the cilnidipine group was significantly greater than in the amlodipine group. Although plasma renin activity did not differ between the two groups, the plasma aldosterone level was significantly decreased in the cilnidipine group. Cilnidipine therefore appears to reduce albuminuria, urinary L-FABP, and plasma aldosterone levels more than amlodipine, and these effects are independent of BP reduction.     

Effects of arterial vasodilators on cardiac hypertrophy and sympathetic activity in rats

In spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), the progression (or absence of regression) of cardiac hypertrophy despite adequate blood pressure (BP) control by arterial vasodilators has been attributed to increased cardiac sympathetic activity. We evaluated changes in indices of general and cardiac sympathetic tone in relation to changes in cardiac anatomy during treatment of normotensive rats and SHR with hydralazine, 120 mg/L, or minoxidil, 120 mg/L of drinking water. In SHR, both vasodilators reduced BP rapidly and consistently. Significant increases in heart rate and plasma norepinephrine were observed only in the initial 2 days of arterial vasodilator treatment. After 5 weeks of treatment, marked increases in left and right ventricular sympathetic activity (as assessed by norepinephrine turnover rates) were present, but no increase was seen in heart rate and plasma norepinephrine. Intravascular volume expansion was observed on Day 14 of minoxidil and Day 35 of hydralazine treatment. Prolonged treatment with minoxidil induced significant increases in left ventricular internal diameter, as well as in left and right ventricular weights, but not in the wall thickness of the left ventricle. Treatment with hydralazine did not affect left ventricular weight and caused a small increase in the weight of the right ventricle. In normotensive rats, both vasodilators initially decreased BP, but tolerance developed within 1 to 2 weeks of treatment. Plasma norepinephrine and heart rate showed increases only at Day 1 of either treatment, whereas cardiac sympathetic hyperactivity persisted at 2 and 5 weeks of treatment. Changes in cardiac anatomy were qualitatively similar to those observed in SHR. We conclude that, during treatment of normotensive rats and SHR with arterial vasodilators, cardiac sympathetic hyperactivity persists and may be involved in the cardiac effects of arterial vasodilators. However, other mechanisms, such as chronic cardiac volume overload, may also play an important role, particularly with minoxidil.     

Comparison of the effects of cilnidipine and amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure.

Cilnidipine is a novel and unique 1,4-dydropyridine derivative calcium antagonist that exerts potent inhibitory actions not only on L-type but also on N-type voltage-dependent calcium channels. Blockade of the neural N-type calcium channel inhibits the secretion of norepinephrine from peripheral neural terminals and depresses sympathetic nervous system activity. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of cilnidipine and amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure (BP) levels. We performed 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring before and after once-daily use of cilnidipine (n=55) and amlodipine (n=55) in 110 hypertensive patients. Both drugs significantly reduced clinic and 24-h systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) (p < 0.005). However, the reductions of 24-h (-1.19+/-6.78 vs. 1.55+/-6.13 bpm, p=0.03), daytime (-1.58+/-6.72 vs. 1.68+/-7.34 bpm, p=0.02) and nighttime (-1.19+/-5.72 vs. 1.89+/-6.56 bpm, p=0.01) pulse rate (PR) were significantly greater in the cilnidipine group than the amlodipine group. There was no correlation between the degree of daytime SBP change and that of daytime PR change after amlodipine treatment (r=-0.08, n.s.), but there was a significant negative correlation between the degree of daytime SBP change and that of day-time PR change after cilnidipine treatment (r=-0.27, p<0.05). N-type calcium channel blockade by cilnidipine may not cause reflex tachycardia, and may be useful for hypertensive treatment.     

Augmented norepinephrine and renin output in response to maximal exercise in hypertensive coarctectomy patients.

To evaluate a possible neural or renal contribution to the hypertension that occurs in some patients following coarctation of aorta repair, 35 patients underwent graded bicycle exercise with serial measurements of plasma norepinephrine concentrations and plasma renin activity. Sixteen patients with coarctectomy who had systolic or diastolic hypertension at peak exercise were compared with 19 normotensive patients with coarctectomy. The average time interval between coarctation repair and study was significantly longer (p less than 0.05) in the hypertensive group than in the normotensive patients (12.8 +/- 4.8 versus 8.7 +/- 2.2 years). The heart rate response to exercise was similar for both patient groups. The systolic blood pressure in the hypertensive group was higher than in the normotensive group at rest in the supine and upright positions and at 5 minutes of recovery, in addition to peak exercise, and the diastolic blood pressure was increased at peak exercise. Plasma norepinephrine concentrations were significantly higher at peak exercise and during recovery in the hypertensive group than in the normotensive patients. Plasma renin activity was also significantly higher in the hypertensive group at peak exercise. These data suggest that patients with coarctectomy who have a hypertensive response to exercise have an augmented sympathetic nervous system output and increased plasma renin activity that may lead to peripheral vasoconstriction at peak exercise and that may contribute to the development of their hypertension.     

Effects of losartan and its combination with quinapril on the cardiac sympathetic nervous system and neurohormonal status in essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Sympathetic nervous and renin-angiotensin systems play important roles in essential hypertension. This study was aimed at assessing the effects of losartan or its combination with quinapril on the cardiac nervous system and neurohormonal status in essential hypertension. DESIGN AND METHODS: Randomized, comparative study of 105 patients with mild essential hypertension, carried out at Shizuoka General Hospital. In phase 1, 40 hypertensives were allocated randomly into the losartan (50 mg) group or the quinapril (10 mg) group. In phase 2, 65 hypertensives, after 3 months 10 mg quinapril monotherapy, were allocated randomly into groups with 50 mg losartan (n = 32) or 5 mg amlodipine (n = 33) added to quinapril, and were treated for a further 3 months. All patients underwent [(123)I]metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging and neurohormonal measurements before and 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: Both monotherapies significantly increased renin activity, while losartan monotherapy also increased angiotensin II (AII) concentration. In both the losartan and quinapril groups, the washout rate was significantly decreased (18.1 +/- 11.4 versus 13.9 +/- 11.0%, P < 0.0002 and 13.3 +/- 9.3 versus 12.3 +/- 9.1%, P < 00001, respectively) without changes in the heart to mediastinum ratio (H/M ratio). Both combined therapies lowered blood pressure to similar levels. A combination therapy with losartan and quinapril significantly increased the H/M ratio (1.93 +/- 0.29 and 2.02 +/- 0.29, P < 0.01) and decreased the washout rate (17.6 +/- 11.0 and 15.3 +/- 9.2%, P < 0.02) without affecting AII concentration, whereas a combination therapy with amlodipine and quinapril therapy did not affect the scintigraphic parameters with an increase in the AII concentration. CONCLUSIONS: With a usual antihypertensive dose, both losartan and quinapril had a little suppressive effect on the cardiac sympathetic activity in essential hypertension. In contrast, the combination therapy with losartan and quinapril, which results in a higher degree of inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system, could suppress the cardiac sympathetic activity effectively.     

Differential effects of enalapril and nitrendipine on the fibrinolytic system in essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Impaired fibrinolysis is associated with thromboembolic complications in hypertensive patients. It has been reported that cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rates are high even after lowering the elevated blood pressure with antihypertensive drugs. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of clinically used dosages of enalapril and nitrendipine on the fibrinolytic system. METHODS: Tissue plasminogen activator antigen (tPA) and tissue plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity were measured in 20 normotensive male subjects and 46 male patients with mild essential hypertension divided into 2 groups (22 patients treated with 5 to 10 mg enalapril once a day and 24 treated with 5 to 10 mg nitrendipine once a day) before and 3 months after drug administration. Plasma renin activity and norepinephrine concentration were also measured. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in basal characteristics between the 2 hypertensive groups. In both hypertensive groups, blood pressure was significantly reduced to a similar level after drug treatment. In the 2 hypertensive groups, plasma renin activity significantly increased after drug treatment; however, there were no significant changes in norepinephrine concentration. Before drug treatment, the 2 hypertensive groups had significantly higher tPA and higher PAI-1 activity than the normotensive subjects. In the enalapril group, there was no significant change in tPA although PAI-1 activity significantly decreased after drug treatment. In the nitrendipine group, there was no significant change in tPA although PAI-1 activity significantly increased after drug treatment. CONCLUSION: Thus enalapril improved impaired fibrinolysis but nitrendipine further aggravated fibrinolysis in essential hypertension. Considering the effect of antihypertensive drugs on the fibrinolytic system, more effective and beneficial treatment of hypertensives, especially at a high risk for thrombus formation might be selected.     

Renal responses to chronic suppression of central sympathetic outflow

Chronic electric activation of the carotid baroreflex produces sustained reductions in sympathetic activity and arterial pressure and is currently being evaluated as hypertension therapy for patients with resistant hypertension. However, the chronic changes in renal function associated with natural suppression of sympathetic activity are largely unknown. In normotensive dogs, we investigated the integrative cardiovascular effects of chronic baroreflex activation (2 weeks) alone and in combination with the calcium channel blocker amlodipine, which is commonly used in the treatment of resistant hypertension. During baroreflex activation alone, there were sustained decreases in mean arterial pressure (17±1 mmHg) and plasma (norepinephrine; ≈35%), with no change in plasma renin activity. Despite low pressure, sodium balance was achieved because of decreased tubular reabsorption, because glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow decreased 10% to 20%. After 2 weeks of amlodipine, arterial pressure was also reduced 17 mmHg, but with substantial increases in norepinephrine and plasma renin activity and no change in glomerular filtration rate. In the presence of amlodipine, baroreflex activation greatly attenuated neurohormonal activation, and pressure decreased even further (by 11±2 mmHg). Moreover, during amlodipine administration, the fall in glomerular filtration rate with baroreflex activation was abolished. These findings suggest that the chronic blood pressure-lowering effects of baroreflex activation are attributed, at least in part, to sustained inhibition of renal sympathetic nerve activity and attendant decreases in sodium reabsorption before the macula densa. Tubuloglomerular feedback constriction of the afferent arterioles may account for reduced glomerular filtration rate, a response abolished by amlodipine, which dilates the preglomerular vasculature.