Metastatic disease of the breast and local recurrence of breast cancer

Breast cancer is a major health problem worldwide with over one million new cases diagnosed each year. The aim of treatment is to achieve good loco-regional control, provide appropriate adjuvant therapy and treat potential micro-metastasis. Good loco-regional control is essential to minimize local recurrence rates with histological clear margin being the most important factor. Several prognostic factors can be used to guide suitable adjuvant therapy. The most important is hormone sensitivity and the use of hormone manipulation has improved both recurrence rates and overall survival. Early detection with breast screening and better treatment options have improved outcome, but still 35–40% of patients will eventually present with metastatic disease. Metastatic disease is incurable, but several therapies have been shown to maintain a good quality of life whilst prolonging survival. A multidisciplinary team approach is essential to obtain the diagnosis and plan the appropriate treatment. The diagnosis of metastatic disease brings distress to patients and their relatives and support should be available from palliative care teams.     

Brain metastasis in de novo breast cancer: An updated population-level study from SEER database

PurposeAlthough there are current studies on breast cancer brain metastasis, population-level analysis is still lacking. As treatment for metastatic breast cancer has improved, an updated population-level analysis is necessary. Our aim was to use the SEER database to characterize the incidence and survival of patients with brain metastases at the initial diagnosis of breast cancer.Patients and methodsPatients with breast cancer from 2010 to 2018 were identified using the SEER database. The stratified incidence and median survival of patients with BM at diagnosis were described. Multivariate logistic and Cox regression were performed to determine the covariates associated with brain metastasis and survival outcomes, respectively. Multiple comparisons based on Cox proportional hazards model were performed for the analysis of interactive effects on overall survival.ResultsA total of 2,248 patients with brain metastases at the initial diagnosis of breast cancer were identified, accounting for 0.40% of all patients with breast cancer, and 7.26% of patients with metastatic disease. Incidence proportions were highest, and survival outcomes were worst among patients with hormone receptor (HR)-negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and triple-negative subtypes. For patients with brain metastases, the prognostic differences among different molecular subtypes have been gradually narrowing, and the survival benefits from various treatment methods have been all increased over time.ConclusionOur study provides an updated population-level estimate of the incidence and survival for patients with brain metastases at the diagnosis of breast cancer, thus may help early identification, prognostic stratification and treatment planning for such patients.     

A case of long term survival with skeletal only metastatic breast cancer

IntroductionThe prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer is very poor. Because of this, treatment of skeletal metastasis is often palliative with limited goals rather than cure. However, there are those patients, such as presented here, who survive for an extended time.Presentation of caseThis thirty-six year old female presented with lytic lesions to one ulna and rib five years after mastectomy for breast cancer. Despite radiation and chemotherapy, the ulnar lesion expanded and resulted in an elbow dislocation. The rib lesion was resected and the arm amputated above the elbow. She developed local recurrence in both her above elbow amputation stump and chest wall and a more proximal below shoulder amputation was performed with resection of chest wall lesion. Even though she had locally aggressive disease, she has survived for 31 years after diagnosis without any evidence of disease.DiscussionReports of metastatic breast cancer survival indicate the five year survival to be 15%. There have been few reports indicating that those patients with skeletal only or oligometastatic disease have improved prognosis. It is not clear what biological properties of these tumors results in the improved survival.ConclusionThis case highlights the challenges of giving patients the optimal treatment in the light of limited ability to predict prognosis. It also highlights the need to further investigate the phenotypes of breast cancer that can, despite metastatic disease and with modern treatment go on to long survival. In addition this case demonstrates the importance of long term followup.     

Centenarians and supercentenarians: a black swan. Emerging social,medical and surgical problems

Background

Five percent of all patients with breast cancer have distant metastatic disease at initial presentation. Because metastatic breast cancer is considered to be an incurable disease, it is generally treated with a palliative intent. Recent non-randomized studies have demonstrated that (complete) resection of the primary tumor is associated with a significant improvement of the survival of patients with primary metastatic breast cancer. However, other studies have suggested that the claimed survival benefit by surgery may be caused by selection bias. Therefore, a randomized controlled trial will be performed to assess whether breast surgery in patients with primary distant metastatic breast cancer will improve the prognosis.

Design

Randomization will take place after the diagnosis of primary distant metastatic breast cancer. Patients will either be randomized to up front surgery of the breast tumor followed by systemic therapy or to systemic therapy, followed by delayed local treatment of the breast tumor if clinically indicated. Patients with primary distant metastatic breast cancer, with no prior treatment of the breast cancer, who are 18 years or older and fit enough to undergo surgery and systemic therapy are eligible. Important exclusion criteria are: prior invasive breast cancer, surgical treatment or radiotherapy of this breast tumor before randomization, irresectable T4 tumor and synchronous bilateral breast cancer. The primary endpoint is 2-year survival. Quality of life and local tumor control are among the secondary endpoints. Based on the results of prior research it was calculated that 258 patients are needed in each treatment arm, assuming a power of 80%. Total accrual time is expected to take 60 months. An interim analysis will be performed to assess any clinically significant safety concerns and to determine whether there is evidence that up front surgery is clinically or statistically inferior to systemic therapy with respect to the primary endpoint.

Discussion

The SUBMIT study is a randomized controlled trial that will provide evidence on whether or not surgery of the primary tumor in breast cancer patients with metastatic disease at initial presentation results in an improved survival.

Trial registration

NCT01392586.     

Survival after surgical treatment of breast cancer

Background The principle objective of locoregional treatment in breast cancer is to eradicate local disease in the breast and local lymph nodes. Surgery in breast cancer provides locoregional control of the disease by resection appropriate to oncological principles, i.e. complete resection with tumour-free margins. Type and extent of breast surgery is dependent on tumour stage; beyond that and even more importantly, prognosis of an individual patient depends upon its stage at diagnosis.Method We reviewed the current literature, working out stage-specific survival and disease-free survival (DFS). The reported data were considered, according to stage and type of surgery, and a clear survey up to 20 years after surgery was depicted. Additionally, we assessed quality of life after breast cancer surgery.Results Overall survival (OS) rates after 5 years range from 93–84% in women diagnosed with stage I disease to 18% in women diagnosed with stage IV disease. In the management of stages I and II breast cancer, breast conservation with lumpectomy and radiation is a preferable alternative to mastectomy, with equivalent patient outcome. In stages III and IV breast cancer, surgery allows local control of the disease, but prognosis depends predominantly on the response to systemic treatment, as does prognosis in all breast cancer patients.Conclusion The reported data distributing patients outcome according to stage and surgical treatment provide a clear summary in order to estimate an individual patients risk.     

Radical surgery with omental flap for uncontrolled locally recurrent breast cancer

Background: Uncontrolled chest wall disease due to breast cancer is a highly morbid condition causing pain, ulceration, malodour and the need for frequent dressings. Aggressive surgical approaches are rarely justified because most patients will succumb to metastatic breast cancer within a short period. A highly selected group of patients with minimal or no evidence of metastatic disease and good performance status may benefit from radical chest wall surgery. Omental transposition flaps are ideal for reconstructing extensive surgical defects following chest wall surgery. Methods: A retrospective review was carried out of 61 female patients treated consecutively between 1980 and 1995. The surgical technique is described herein. Results: All patients were symptomatic preoperatively. Symptoms included ulceration (80%), pain (44%) and malodour (40%). Twenty‐nine patients had uncontrolled local recurrence following initial treatment for locally advanced breast cancer and 32 patients developed uncontrolled recurrence after treatment for operable breast cancer by mastectomy or conservation surgery. Median survival following chest wall surgery was 21 months and the median local recurrence‐free interval was 20 months. Morbidity was ­limited. There were no cases of major flap loss. Twenty‐nine patients (48%) had no further local disease. Eighteen patients (30%) developed soft‐tissue recurrence at the edge of the omental flap or in surrounding skin and 14 (23%) developed recurrence beneath the flap. Conclusion: In a highly selected group of patients with symptomatic uncontrolled chest wall recurrence who are fit and have an expectation of at least moderate‐term survival, radical chest wall surgery and omental flap transposition offers excellent palliation and local control in the majority of patients     

Treatment of locally recurrent and advanced breast cancer

The incidence of breast cancer in the UK continues to increase; however, the death rates continue to decline. Mortality rates have reduced by 19% in the UK in the last decade and are projected to fall by a further 26% in 2014–2035. Cancer research UK reports 55,176 new cases in 2015–2017 with 11,547 deaths from breast cancer reported from 2016 to 2018. Ten-year survival for all comers is reported at 76%. Largely, the improvements in outcomes is felt to be multi factorial in nature with earlier detection of cancers, increased axial imaging and the rapidly progressing and expanding radiotherapy and systemic therapy treatment options available. Irrespective of this, there are still a number of patients diagnosed with more advanced disease. Between 13% and 21% of patients are diagnosed with stage III/IV disease, with 7% of patients having metastatic disease at diagnosis. The following review discusses the treatment options available to patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC).     

Incidence,risk factors and survival of patients with brain metastases at initial metastatic breast cancer diagnosis in China

PurposeTo characterize the incidence, risk factors and survival of patients with brain metastases at initial diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in China.MethodsThe China National Cancer Center database was used to identify 2087 MBC patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2015. Clinicopathological features, treatment and survival information were extracted. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression were performed to determine factors predictive of brain metastases at MBC diagnosis and survival, respectively.ResultsBrain metastases occurred in ninety patients (4.3%) at MBC diagnosis, and in 27 patients (2.5%), 42 patients (7.2%) and 21 patients (5.2%) with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR + HER2-), HER2-positive and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), respectively. HER2-positive subtype (OR = 2.38; 95% CI 1.40–4.04; p < 0.0001), TNBC subtype (OR = 1.89; 95% CI 1.02–3.51; p = 0.005), and metastases to all three sites of bone, liver and lungs (OR = 3.23; 95% CI 1.52–6.87; p = 0.002) were shown to increase the risk of BM at MBC diagnosis. Median survival after BM was 23.7 months. First-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) improved survival compared to trastuzumab-based regimen (44.9 vs 35.4 months, p = 0.09). Factors that independently decreased BM death risk were ECOG<2, brain metastases only and multidisciplinary treatment.ConclusionHER2-positive and TNBC subtypes have a higher incidence of BM at initial MBC diagnosis. Brain screening might be considered in patients with HER2-positive disease at MBC diagnosis, and further prospective randomized study is warranted.     

Ten daily fractions for partial breast irradiation. Long‐term results of a prospective phase II trial

Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is an effective adjuvant treatment after breast conservative surgery for selected early‐stage breast cancer patients. However, the best fractionation scheme is not well defined. Hereby, we report the 5‐year clinical outcome and toxicity of a phase II prospective study of a novel regimen to deliver PBI, which consists in 40 Gy delivered in 10 daily fractions. Patients with early‐stage (pT1‐pT2, pN0‐pN1a, M0) invasive breast cancer were enrolled after conservative surgery. The minimum age at diagnosis was 60 years old. PBI was delivered with 3D‐conformal radiotherapy technique with a total dose of 40 Gy, fractionated in 10 daily fractions (4 Gy/fraction). Eighty patients were enrolled. The median follow‐up was 67 months. Five‐year local control (LC), disease‐free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were 95%, 91%, and 96%, respectively. Grade I and II subcutaneous fibrosis were documented in 23% and 5% of cases. No grade III late toxicity was observed. PBI delivered in 40 Gy in 10 daily fractions provided good clinical results and was a valid radiotherapy option for early‐stage breast cancer patients.     

Timing of Surgical Intervention for the Intact Primary in Stage IV Breast Cancer Patients

Background Recent studies demonstrate improved progression-free survival (PFS) and improved overall survival (OS) with extirpation of the primary tumor in breast cancer patients who present with metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. The subset of patients who would most benefit from surgery remains unclear. This study evaluates the pathological attributes and optimum timing for surgery in patients who present with stage IV breast cancer and an intact primary. Methods Retrospective, single-institution review of all breast cancer patients between 1997 and 2002 presenting with an intact tumor and synchronous metastatic disease. Information collected included: demographics, tumor characteristics, metastatic sites, type/timing of surgery, and radiation/systemic therapy received. Patients initiated treatment within 3 months of their diagnosis. Patients were divided into three groups based on time interval from diagnosis date to surgery date. Disease progression and vital status at last follow-up were evaluated. Analysis of metastatic PFS (defined by progression of systemic disease) benefit in relation to surgical timing was performed. Results Multivariate analysis revealed patients having only one site of metastasis, negative margins, and Caucasian race had improved PFS. Further analysis revealed non-Caucasian patients more often underwent surgical intervention for palliation versus surgery for curative intent, possibly explaining their worse outcome. Patients who underwent surgery in the 3–8.9 month or later period had improved metastatic PFS. Conclusions: Surgical extirpation of the primary tumor in patients with synchronous stage IV disease is associated with improved metastatic PFS when performed more than 3 months after diagnosis. Resection should be planned with the intent of obtaining negative margins.     

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Both gemcitabine and vinorelbine as single agents have significant activity against metastatic breast cancer, with an overall response rate ranging from 14% to 40%. Because each drug has different mechanisms of action and toxicity profile, we have evaluated the activity and tolerability as a combined regimen in metastatic breast cancer patients. Thirty-two breast cancer patients with prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease received a combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine at 1,200 and 30 mg/m ², respectively. The drugs were administered on days 1 and 8 of every 21-day cycle. The study was designed to evaluate the response rate, the duration of response, the time to progression, and overall survival. Toxicity and tolerability of this combination were also evaluated. Out of 32 patients analyzed, a complete response was achieved in 2 patients (6.3%) and a partial response in 12 patients (37.5%), with an overall response rate of 43.8%. After a median follow-up of 7 months, the median duration of response was 5.3 months, and the time to progression was 5.0 months. Overall survival was not reached because the majority of the patients were alive at the time of analysis. The gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination was tolerable, with hematologic toxicity being the most common side-effect. Three patients suffered from grade 4 neutropenia, and none suffered from grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was minimal and transient, with nausea and phlebitis being the most common. The gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination at the previously specified doses shows significant activity in metastatic breast cancer patients. The treatment is well tolerated and has an acceptable toxicity profile. In patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes, this combination regimen offers an alternative treatment with preservation of a good quality of life.     

Male breast cancer: 6-year experience

AIM: Breast cancer in men is a very rare neoplasm accounting 1% of all breast cancer with an incidence ratio of 1:100 of men to women and about 1% of all malignancies in men. On the basis of the literature review the authors tried to determine the main characteristics of this rare neoplasm in terms of epidemiology, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and survival. METHODS: The authors report the experience of the Breast Unit of the San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital in Rome, where 4 cases of male breast cancer were observed and treated over 784 breast cancers. RESULTS: All tumours were ductal carcinomas. The extent of disease was as follows: 3 cases with stage I and 1 case with Stage IIIB; in two cases estrogen and progesterone receptors expression was 100% and in the other two cases it was 20-80%. Median follow up was 57.5 months. At present, after 6-year follow up the three patients with stage I are in good conditions; the patient with stage III died after 27 months with metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment remains the gold standard in male breast cancer. The prognosis for males with breast cancer is similar to female patients on equal terms of stage of disease. Adjuvant therapy is based on retrospective studies of male breast cancer conducted over the past 20 years using the guidelines for breast cancer in women.     

Improved survival in metastatic breast cancer 1985–2016

PurposeIn the last 25 years new treatment options in breast cancer have evolved. We wanted to determine whether the survival of; patients with metastatic breast cancer have improved during this period.MethodsPatients consecutively diagnosed with disseminated breast cancer 1985–2014 in the County of Kalmar, Sweden, were identified and followed to 2016. Survival was calculated for each successive 5 year interval. Separate analyses were performed for pts with ER and/or PR and HER2 positive tumours resp.ResultsMedian survival of the 784 patients increased successively from 13 to 33 months. Five year survival increased from 10 to 27%. Patients with high grade primary tumours had the shortest post recurrence survival time but their median survival increased significantly by time from 12 to 30 months, 3 year survival from 16 to 38% and 5 year from 5 to 20%. Median survival for patients with grade 2 tumours was 2 years and did not improve. Only 47 patients had grade 1 tumours and their median survival of 4 years did not change.Median survival for HER2 positive patients treated before the introduction of trastuzumab in year 2000 was 14 months and after 2000 29 months, 5 year survival improved from 2 to 31%.ConclusionsSurvival in metastatic breast cancer improved 1985–2016. For the first time a significant increase in survival time for patients with metastasis from fast-growing grade 3 tumours was seen. The most striking improvement was achieved in the HER2 positive subset.     

Co-overexpression of HER2/HER3 is a predictor of impaired survival in breast cancer patients

BackgroundRecently, HER3-expression was postulated as independent risk factor for metastatic spread. Therefore, we investigated the role of HER3 expression as prognostic marker in metastatic breast cancer patients.MethodsPatients of different breast cancer subtypes diagnosed with metastatic disease (visceral and/or brain metastases) were identified from a breast cancer database. Tissue samples of the respective primary tumors were retrieved, and immunohistochemical staining for estrogen-receptor, progesterone-receptor, HER2, and HER3 was performed. In HER2 equivocal and selected HER3 positive cases, subsequent fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was performed.ResultsTissue specimens of 110 patients were available for this analysis. 21% had strong, complete, membranous HER3 staining of at least 10% of all tumor cells; HER3 protein expression was not associated with HER3 gene amplification. HER2/HER3 co-overexpression was observed in 12/110 (11%) specimens and HER3-overexpression showed a statistically significant association with HER2-overexpression (p = 0.02). No correlation was observed for HER3-overexpression and overall survival (OS), time to diagnosis of brain metastases, and incidence of brain metastases. Still, in patients with HER3 overexpression, a higher rate of ‘brain only’ metastatic behavior was observed (p = 0.042). In the HER2-positive subgroup, HER3-overexpression was significantly associated with shorter OS from diagnosis of metastatic disease (median 17 vs. 35 months; p = 0.04; log rank test).ConclusionsHER2/HER3 co-overexpression is significantly associated with impaired OS from diagnosis of metastatic disease in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Co-inhibition of HER2 and HER3 or the inhibition of HER2/HER3 hetero-dimerization may improve clinical outcome in this subgroup.     

Implication of breast cancer phenotype for patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis

BackgroundWe aimed to study the implications of breast cancer (BC) subtypes for the development and prognosis of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC).Patients and methodsData from the breast cancer patients diagnosed with LC between 2005 and 2010 were retrieved. Patients were classified in luminal A, B, HER2 positive and triple negative (TN) and their BC diagnosis, treatment, and outcome were analyzed according to each subtype. Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact test were used for categorical variables. Survival analyses were performed by Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.ResultsA total of 38 BC patients were identified, with a median age of 54.8 years (range 36–79). The proportion of luminal A, B, HER2 positive and TN was 18.4%, 31.6%, 26.3% and 23.7%, respectively. LC was the first evidence of metastatic disease in 5 BC patients. Twenty patients received the systemic chemotherapy, with 16 (80%) whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Nine patients received only WBRT. TN patients had the shorter interval between metastatic breast cancer diagnosis and the development of LC. Median survival after the diagnosis of LC (OSLC) was 2.6 months (range 1.2–6.4), and did not differ across breast cancer subtypes. In univariate analysis, performance status (ECOG = 0–2) and chemotherapy were prognostic for OSLC, but only the treatment stood as an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis.ConclusionsBreast cancer subtype influences the timing of LC appearance, but not OSLC. Patients with LC from breast cancer should be offered systemic treatment, as it appears to associate with the improved outcome. New therapeutic strategy, including, targeted and intrathecal therapy are deserved for BC patients with LC.     

Effect of primary tumor resection on overall survival in patients with stage IV breast cancer

We aimed to evaluate the effect of primary tumor resection on overall survival in stage IV breast cancer patients. In total, 284 breast cancer patients presenting with breast cancer at stage IV at initial diagnosis, between 2001 and 2014, were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical resection of the primary tumor. Overall survival (OS) between the two groups was analyzed. Patients in the surgery group (n = 92) had smaller tumors than those in the no‐surgery group (n = 192, T0‐1:17.7% vs 34.8%, P < 0.001). The surgery group more often had negative nodal status (5.7% vs 33.7%, P < 0.001). Multiple metastatic organ sites were more common in the no‐surgery group than in the surgery group (55.7% vs 15.2%, P < 0.001). The surgery group showed a better OS than the no‐surgery group (P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that surgical resection of primary tumors tended to be associated with improved OS (HR = 0.67, P = 0.055). T stage, ER, HER2 and metastatic organ sites were independent prognostic factors for OS in multivariate analysis. Surgical resection of the primary tumor may be a treatment option for patients with stage IV disease and may not have a negative effect on overall survival.     

Characterizing lobular carcinoma of the male breast using the SEER database

Background

Lobular carcinoma of the male breast is rare. We sought to investigate the clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of men and women with lobular breast cancer, using a population-based database.

Methods

We reviewed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database 1988–2008 and identified patients with a lobular breast cancer diagnosis (invasive lobular carcinoma [ILC] and lobular carcinoma in situ [LCIS]) using the “International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition” codes. Bivariate analyses compared the male and female patients on demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment modalities. Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined the risk-adjusted likelihood of receiving treatment. Survival analysis was done and hazard ratios were obtained using Cox proportional models.

Results

Overall, 133,339 patients were identified, including 133,168 women (99.9%) and 171 men (0.1%). Most had ILC (82.08%). The median age was 66 ± 20 y for the men and 61 ± 21 y for the women. The men with ILC were more likely to have poorly differentiated tumors (26.45% versus 15.61%; P < 0.001) and stage IV disease (9.03% versus 4.18%; P = 0.005) than were the women. The cancer-specific 5-year survival rates for ILC were 82.9% for the men and 91.9% for the women. Adjusted survival was better for patients with ILC receiving surgery plus radiotherapy than patients receiving neither (hazard ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.49–0.56). Women with ILC had a 55% increased odds of receiving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with men (odds ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.08–2.22).

Conclusions

ILC presents at a higher grade and stage in men. The difference in disease characteristics and survival rates suggests that the treatment of men with lobular breast cancer should be adjusted to improve their outcomes.     

Clinical outcome in women with HER2-positive de novo or recurring stage IV breast cancer receiving trastuzumab-based therapy

BackgroundFive to 10% of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer have synchronous metastases (de novo stage IV). A further 20% will develop metastases during follow-up (recurring stage IV). We compared the clinical outcomes of women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving first-line trastuzumab-based therapy according to type of metastatic presentation.Patients and methodsRetrospective analysis of 331 MBC patients receiving first-line trastuzumab-based treatment. Response rates (RR) were compared by the chi-square test. Time-to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) curves were compared by the log-rank test. Cox-proportional hazards models were used to study predictors of PFS and OS, including the type of metastatic presentation.ResultsSeventy-seven patients (23%) had de novo stage IV disease. Forty-six of these patients underwent surgery of the primary (“de novo/surgery”). Response rates to first-line trastuzumab-based therapy and median progression-free survival did not differ in patients with “recurring”, “de novo/surgery” and “de novo” without surgery (“de novo/no surgery) stage IV breast cancer. However, women with “de novo/surgery” stage IV breast cancer had the longest median OS (60 months), and those with “de novo/no surgery” stage IV breast cancer the shortest (26 months). For women with recurring metastatic breast cancer median OS was 40 months (overall log-rank test, p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed these findings.ConclusionOur analysis shows that response rates and PFS to first-line trastuzumab-based therapy do not differ significantly between de novo and recurring stage IV, HER2 positive breast cancer. The observed difference in OS favoring women with de novo stage IV disease submitted to surgery of the primary tumor could be the result of a selection bias.     

Metastatic disease of the breast and local recurrence

Multimodality primary therapies for breast cancer combined with earlier detection have led to a sharp decline in the death rate from breast cancer in the UK over the last 40 years in the face of a rising incidence. The latest UK statistics from Cancer Research UK report 50,285 new cases of breast cancer in 2011 with 11,716 deaths from breast cancer recorded in 2012. Crudely, this equates to a cure rate in excess of 75% for all comers. Despite this good news, there are still significant numbers of women (and men) who suffer from either a local recurrence or metastatic disease following apparently successful treatment for early breast cancer (Stage I–III). Only a minority of individuals, 6.6% with the stage recorded at diagnosis, present with stage IV disease. This review considers the treatment options available to individuals with locally recurrent and advanced breast cancer (ABC).