成人间活体肝移植供肝的后台准备

目的 探讨成人活体肝移植供肝的灌注和管道重建的技术。方法 回顾性分析41例成人活体肝移植供肝的后台处理临床资料。结果 41个供肝,均为不包括肝中静脉的右半肝,供者男9例,女32例,年龄19～65岁。供肝切取后经门静脉灌注HTK液2～3L（平均2.45L）。只有一支门静脉右支者35例,右前支＋右后支门静脉6例。右肝管29例,右前叶肝管＋右后叶肝管10例,右后叶肝管＋右前上段支＋右前下段支2例。肝静脉：右肝下静脉＋V_5/V_814例,只有一支右肝静脉15例,2支肝中静脉分支8例,4例有3支肝中静脉分支。肝中静脉分支直径〉0.5cm者均重建,重建V_5/V_8和右肝下静脉28例次（70.0%）,右前叶肝管和右后叶肝管整形6例（14.6%）,右后叶肝管和右前叶下段肝管整形3例（7.3%）,门静脉整形2例（4.8%）,门静脉搭桥4例（9.7%）。结论 成人活体肝移植的供肝后台处理与尸体肝移植有明显的不同,其断面的管道处理直接影响移植肝的存活和预后。     

Superior vena cava graft for right liver and right lateral sector transplantation

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of cryopreserved superior vena cava (SVC) grafts for venous reconstruction remains to be evaluated in right liver and right lateral sector transplantation. METHODS: Reconstruction of the hepatic vein was performed when the congested area in the liver graft was significant. A vein graft with a suitable shape and length meeting the demands for the venoplasty was selected, and SVC grafts were used in 20 recipients. Surgical techniques were classified into five types according to the necessity of middle or short hepatic vein reconstruction in the liver graft. Surgical outcomes and vein graft patency were evaluated. RESULTS: All 20 recipients survived the operation without any complications caused by congestion. Liver functions were well recovered in the early postoperative period. The 1-year primary patency rates of cryopreserved vein grafts used for reconstructed right hepatic veins, inferior right hepatic veins, and middle hepatic vein tributaries were 100%, 94%, and 42%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SVC grafts were feasible for outflow tract reconstruction in right liver and right lateral sector transplantation, although the long-term patency of the grafts for middle hepatic vein reconstruction remains to be evaluated.     

Right lobe living donor liver transplantation-addressing the middle hepatic vein controversy

OBJECTIVE: To describe our approach in the decision-making for taking the middle hepatic vein with the graft or leaving it with the remnant liver in right lobe live donor liver transplantation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Right lobe living donor liver transplantation has been successfully performed. However, the extent of donor hepatectomy is still a subject of debate and the main considerations in the decision making are graft functional adequacy and donor safety. METHODS: An algorithm based on donor-recipient body weight ratio, right lobe-to-recipient standard liver volume estimate, and donor hepatic venous anatomy was used to decide the extent of donor hepatectomy. This algorithm was applied in 25 living donor liver transplant operations performed between January 1999 and January 2002. In grafts taken without the middle hepatic vein, anterior segment tributaries draining into it were not reconstructed. Outcomes between right lobe liver transplants with (Group I) and without (Group II) the middle hepatic vein were compared. RESULTS: Ten grafts included the middle hepatic vein and 15 did not. The mean graft to recipient standard liver volume ratio was 58% and 64% in Groups I and II, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant. Donors from both groups had comparable recovery, with 2 complications, 1 from each group, requiring a percutaneous drainage procedure. The recipient outcomes were, likewise, comparable and there was 1 case of structural outflow obstruction in Group I, which required venoangioplasty and stenting. There were 2 recipient mortalities, 1 due to a biliary complication and the other to recurrent hepatitis C. Another patient required retransplantation for secondary biliary cirrhosis. The overall actuarial graft and patient survival rates are 84% and 96%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 16 months. CONCLUSION: Based on certain preoperative criteria, a right lobe graft can be taken with or without the middle hepatic vein with equally successful outcomes in both the donors and recipients. The decision, therefore, of the extent of right lobe donor hepatectomy should be tailored to the particular conditions of each case.     

Intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy for evaluating hepatic venous outflow in living-donor right lobe liver

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine the usefulness of intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) for evaluating the extent of congestion in the anterior segment of the graft after living-donor liver transplantation using right lobe grafts that do not have the middle hepatic vein. METHODS: Fifteen patients undergoing living-donor liver transplantation using a right lobe graft without the middle hepatic vein were enrolled in this study. During the course of harvesting and implantation, in vivo NIRS was performed on the liver grafts to determine hemoglobin (Hb) and cytochrome oxidase content in the hepatic tissues. RESULTS: The 15 cases were divided into three groups according to the caliber of the middle hepatic vein tributaries in the right lobe grafts: the small group (<4 mm), the intermediate group (4-7 mm), and the large group (>7 mm). After implantation, congestion (increase in tissue Hb) in the anterior segment was more severe than that in the posterior segment in the intermediate and large groups. However, well-preserved mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase redox state was observed in both segments except for two cases in the large group with severe congestion in the anterior segment. The extent of postoperative congestion in the anterior segment was significantly correlated with the tissue content of remaining Hb in that segment after ex vivo flushing. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative NIRS enables quantification of the extent of congestion in the anterior segment after implantation of a right lobe liver graft and even enables prediction of such congestion at the phase of ex vivo perfusion.     

Reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein tributaries draining segments V and VIII of a right liver graft by using the recipient’s own middle hepatic vein and vascular closure staples

A right liver graft lacking the middle hepatic vein can result in congestion of the anterior segment. We describe a method of reconstructing the middle hepatic vein tributaries by using the recipient’s own middle hepatic vein with vascular closure staples. During a living donor right liver transplantation, the middle hepatic vein tributaries draining segments V (V5) and VIII (V8) of the right lobe graft were reconstructed using the recipient’s own middle hepatic vein and secured with vascular closure staples. Computed tomography showed good venous outflow from the middle hepatic vein and no congestion or atrophy of the anterior segment of the right liver grafts. Thus, using the recipient’s own middle hepatic vein is a suitable option for reconstructing the middle hepatic vein tributaries (V8 and V5) in right-liver living donor transplantation and the application of vascular closure staples helps to accomplish this.     

Right liver graft without middle hepatic vein reconstruction from a living donor

A case of adult-to-adult, living-donor liver transplantation using a right liver graft is described. In the donor operation, when the middle hepatic vein (MHV) was clamped after hepatic transection, reversed flow was detected in MHV tributaries by intraoperative color Doppler ultrasonography. Regurgitated flow in the clamped inferior right hepatic vein was also demonstrated. Portal flow remained hepatopetal during the procedure. Based on these ultrasonographic findings, neither the MHV tributaries nor the inferior right hepatic vein was reconstructed.     

Techniques of reconstruction of hepatic veins in living-donor liver transplantation, especially for right hepatic vein and major short hepatic veins of right-lobe graft

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is now widely accepted as a therapeutic option for adult patients with acute and chronic end-stage liver disease. In the early period, the left lobe was the major liver graft used in adult LDLT to ensure donor safety, especially in Eastern countries. However, the frequent extremes of graft-size insufficiency in left-lobe LDLT represented a greater risk of small-for-size graft syndrome in the recipient, which has focused attention on transplantation of the right lobe from a living donor. The major concern of right-lobe LDLT has focused on its safety for the donor and the necessity for including the middle hepatic vein (MHV) in the graft to avoid congestion of the right anterior segment. The MHV carries out important venous drainage for the right anterior segment and is essential for perfect graft function. The decision of whether to take the MHV with the liver graft (extended right lobe graft) or whether to retain it in the donor, with reconstruction of the MHV tributaries in the liver graft (modified right lobe graft) has been extensively discussed in numerous studies. However, adequate right hepatic vein and major short hepatic vein (middle and inferior right hepatic vein [RHV]) drainage of the liver graft is perhaps equally important as MHV outflow drainage for the integrity of right-lobe graft function. Herein, the author describes various techniques of venoplasty of the right hepatic vein (RHV) and the major short hepatic veins to obviate venous outflow obstruction in these veins.     

采用不含肝中静脉的右半肝行成人间活体肝移植

目的探讨采用不含肝中静脉的右半肝行成人间活体肝移植的可行性及安全性。方法2002年1月至2005年8月,我院施行了16例成人间右半肝活体肝移植,术中采用了不含肝中静脉的右半肝移植物,同时进行了一系列改良的手术技术包括肝右静脉的重建,右肝下静脉的重建,肝中静脉分支的搭桥等改进。结果全组供者无严重并发症及死亡。前2例受者中,1例发生肝静脉吻合口狭窄,1例因发生小肝综合征,死于肝功进行性恶化。后14例受者中发生并发症5例:急性排斥反应,肝动脉栓塞,胆漏,左膈下脓肿及肺部感染各1例;1例再移植术后肺部感染死于MODS。14例中除肝右静脉与下腔静脉(IVC)直接吻合外,其中5例加行右肝下静脉重建,另5例采用自体大隐静脉搭桥行肝中静脉分支与IVC重建,保证了右肝的流出道通畅。移植物与受者重量比(GRWR)为0.72%~1.15%,11例<1.0%,其中2例<0.8%,无小肝综合征发生。结论采用了改进的手术技术,特别是肝静脉流出道的充分重建可有效的避免小肝综合征,从而使采用不含肝中静脉的活体右半肝移植成为安全可靠的手术方式。     

Donor graft outflow venoplasty in living donor liver transplantation.

Hepatic venous outflow reconstruction is a key to successful living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) because its obstruction leads to graft dysfunction and eventual loss. Inclusion or reconstruction of most draining veins is ideal to ensure graft venous drainage and avoids acute congestion in the donor graft. We developed donor graft hepatic venoplasty techniques for multiple hepatic veins that can be used in either right- or left-lobe liver transplantation. In left-lobe grafts, venoplasty consisting of the left hepatic vein and adjacent veins such as the left superior vein, middle hepatic vein, or segment 3 vein is performed to create a single, wide orifice without compromising outflow for anastomosis with the recipient's vena cava. In right lobe graft where a right hepatic vein (RHV) is adjacent with a significantly-sized segment 8 vein, accessory RHV, and/or inferior RHV, venoplasty of the RHV with the accessory RHV, inferior RHV, and/or segment 8 vein is performed to create a single orifice for single outflow reconstruction with the recipient's RHV or vena cava. Of 35 venoplasties, 2 developed hepatic venous stenoses which were promptly managed with percutaneous interventional radiologic procedures. No graft was lost due to hepatic venous stenosis. In conclusion, these techniques avoid interposition grafts, are easily performed at the back table, simplify graft-to-recipient cava anastomosis, and avoid venous outflow narrowing.     

Impact of non-congestive graft size in living donor liver transplantation: new indicator for additional vein reconstruction in right liver graft.

Addition of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) or reconstruction of its tributaries to increase noncongestive graft volume is expected to improve graft function in right liver living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, the relationship between noncongestive graft volume and graft function after transplantation has not been clarified and definitive criteria for the reconstruction of MHV tributaries have yet to be established. We analyzed 29 right liver LDLT cases. The noncongestive graft weight was calculated as the total weight of the graft regions drained by hepatic veins reconstructed without postoperative occlusion. We calculated the noncongestive graft-to-recipient weight ratio (ncGRWR) by comparing it to the GRWR. Indocyanine green (ICG) clearance results on days 1 and 3 were significantly correlated with ncGRWR, but not with GRWR. Patients were then divided into 2 groups based on ncGRWR: lower than the median (L-ncGRWR group) and above the median (H-ncGRWR group). ICG clearance in the H-ncGRWR group was significantly better on days 1 and 3. For a different analysis, the patients were again divided into 2 groups, those with and without prolonged cholestasis after transplantation. ncGRWR was significantly lower in patients with prolonged cholestasis, and 7 of 9 patients with an ncGRWR value lower than 0.65 suffered from prolonged cholestasis. Our results demonstrated that the noncongestive volume of a right liver graft has a significant association with early graft function. Further, ncGRWR can play a key role in preoperative determination for additional vein reconstruction of MHV tributaries. When the estimated ncGRWR value with reconstruction of only the right hepatic vein (RHV) (+ inferior right hepatic vein [IRHV]) is less than 0.65, additional vein reconstruction of MHV tributaries should be planned.     

Complicated hepatic vein reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: Case report and literature review

Hepatic vein reconstruction is one of the crucial issues in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In the present study, we report on a right liver LDLT excluding middle hepatic vein (MHV) using an MHV‐dominant graft. Two large‐sized inferior right hepatic veins were anastomosed to the recipient's inferior vena cava, respectively, in an end‐to‐side fashion. MHV tributaries were reconstructed using Y‐shaped cryopreserved iliac artery, but resulted in segment VIII congestion. A Fogarty catheter was then used to take out the thrombus and control the bleeding when anastomosis was being performed. The patient recovered uneventfully. Postoperative computed tomography showed patent interposition grafts and normal perfusion of the liver. The patient was doing well 13 months after transplantation.     

成人间活体扩大右半肝移植治疗急性肝功能衰竭

目的介绍成人间活体扩大右半肝移植治疗急性肝功能衰竭的临床经验。方法对1例42岁男性急性肝功能衰竭合并肝性脑病Ⅲ期患者行活体扩大右半肝移植治疗。其45岁姐姐为供者,CT评估供者包含肝中静脉的扩大右半肝体积为728．4cm^2（801g）,供肝／受者体重比为1．3％。供肝之肝右、中静脉整形后与受者整形后之肝右静脉行端-侧吻合;供受者门静脉、肝动脉行端．端吻合。供肝胆管整形后与受者胆总管行端-端吻合。结果供、受者手术均成功。供者术后恢复顺利,受者术后8h恢复意识,14d后丙氨酸转氨酶、总胆红素等指标首次下降至正常水平。术后16d曾出现转氨酶明显升高,给予甲泼尼龙1000mg冲击治疗后恢复正常。随访至今,供受者已健康生存8个月,均未出现胆管、肝动脉及静脉回流等并发症。结论扩大右半肝移植在技术上完全可行。能为成人患者提供足够重量的移植物,尤其对于急性肝功能衰竭患者具有重要意义,术前精确的影像学评估,熟练的肝切除和肝移植技术是确保该类手术成功的关键因素。     

Usefulness of three-dimensional computed tomography in a living-donor extended right lobe liver transplantation

Although living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) of right lobe graft is becoming a popular option for adult patients, management of venous outflow remains controversial. We report a successful extended-right lobe liver transplantation using a recipient's left portal vein as a graft from the middle hepatic vein. Preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) of the donor revealed a small right hepatic vein (RHV) without inferior RHV and a large middle hepatic vein (MHV) draining segments 5 and 8. During the donor operation, right lobe graft was harvested with the MHV, preserving the drainage vein from segment 4. The donor recovered uneventfully except for mild transient hyperbilirubinemia. The recipient's condition rapidly improved, and was discharged from hospital 49 days postoperation. A 3D-CT after LDLT also clearly revealed successful vascular anastomosis. Preoperative and postoperative 3D-CT was useful for determination of the vascular anatomy and the decision about the line of transection in the donor hepatectomy, as well as for evaluation of the vascular anastomoses after transplantation. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:1076-1079.)     

Efficacy of anterior segment drainage reconstruction in right-lobe liver grafts from living donors

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of additional venous reconstruction in the anterior segment has not been fully investigated for graft congestion in right-lobe liver grafts. METHODS: Posttransplant graft venous congestion in the anterior segment was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging in right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation. Additional venous reconstruction was categorized into two types: reconstruction of tributaries from segment 5 or 8 (n=11) and reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) (n=9). Forty-five grafts only with right-sided hepatic vein(s) including the right hepatic vein served as controls. RESULTS: No significant difference in congestion score of the anterior segment was observed between grafts with V5/8 and standard grafts 1 month after transplantation despite the patency of reconstruction. Only grafts with the MHV showed no congestion (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Drainage reconstruction of tributaries from the anterior segment produces only suboptimal benefits when evaluated radiologically. The addition of the main trunk of the MHV with its surrounding communication has the best effect on the congestion of the anterior segment.     

Vein reconstruction in modified right liver graft for living donor liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE: To report the authors' experience with hepatic vein reconstruction and plasty in living donor liver transplantation for adult patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A right liver graft without the middle hepatic vein (MHV) trunk (modified right liver graft) can cause severe congestion of the right paramedian sector. However, the need for MHV reconstruction has not been fully recognized. METHODS: From June 2000 to December 2001, 30 adult patients received a modified right liver graft. Major MHV tributaries were preserved and reconstructed under the authors' criteria. Plasty of recipient hepatic veins for a wide outflow orifice was performed when necessitated. The regeneration of paramedian and lateral sectors of the grafts was examined by computed tomography 1 and 3 months after the operation. RESULTS: MHV tributaries were reconstructed in 18 grafts. Plasty of recipient hepatic veins was performed in 15 patients. All patients survived the operation. The regeneration of paramedian and lateral sectors was equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: A modified right liver graft can provide satisfactory surgical results if hepatic vein reconstruction and plasty are performed using the present techniques.     

Microcirculatory changes in right lobe grafts in living-donor liver transplantation: a near-infrared spectrometry study

BACKGROUND: A continuing shortage of cadaveric liver even for adult patients has motivated not a few centers to proceed to living-donor liver transplantation using right lobe grafts. One of controversies is potential congestion in the graft anterior segment by the deprivation of the middle hepatic vein. METHODS: Hepatic tissue oxygenation and hemoglobin concentration were investigated with a near-infrared spectroscopy in the course of harvesting and implantation in living-donor liver transplantation. Twenty adult recipients of right lobe graft were involved in the study. The aim of the analysis was to detect tissue congestion or ischemia. RESULTS: No significant change in mean hepatic tissue oxygenation and hemoglobin was noted in the right lobe during donor operation even after hepatic parenchymal transection, although some trend for relative congestion, i.e., increased tissue hemoglobin, compared with the left lobe was observed. After graft reperfusion in the recipient, both mean hepatic tissue oxygen saturation and hemoglobin decreased significantly in the anterior segment, which was accompanied by increased heterogeneity of tissue hemoglobin and oxygenation. Increased heterogeneity of oxygenation and decreased tissue hemoglobin were observed also in the posterior segment. CONCLUSIONS: The anterior segment in right lobe living-donor liver transplantation is sensitive to ischemia, rather than congestion, at least in the immediate phase after graft reperfusion. The anterior segment seems to be also more prone to circulatory disturbance than the other part of the graft.     

成人间不含肝中静脉右半肝活体肝移植静脉流出道重建技术的改进

目的 探讨不含肝中静脉(middle hepatic vein,MHV)的成人间右半肝活体肝移植(living donor liver transplantation,LDLT)静脉流出道重建技术的改进方法.方法 通过长征医院器官移植研究所2007年6月至2008年1月完成的11例次成人间不含肝中静脉的右半肝活体肝移植病例的回顾性分析,对成人间不含肝中静脉的右半肝活体肝移植静脉流出道重建技术的改进进行总结.主要技术改进包括:采用供肝右肝静脉、受体腔静脉联合扩大成形吻合技术重建流出道;采用在4℃UW液中保存7 d以内的尸体同种异体静脉移植血管重建供肝Ⅴ、Ⅷ段肝静脉粗大属支以及右肝下静脉.结果 11例次成人间不含肝中静脉右半肝活体肝移植中10例次采用了右肝静脉、腔静脉联合扩大成形吻合技术;利用尸体同种异体静脉移植血管架桥重建肝Ⅴ、Ⅷ段肝静脉以及右肝下静脉流出道的例数占同期实施的成人间活体肝移植总例数的81.8%(9/11),其中架桥重建1支肝静脉7例,架桥重建2支肝静脉1例,架桥重建3支肝静脉1例,11例病人中,1例病人术后14 d死于肾功能衰竭和肺部感染,超声检查血流通畅,未发现架桥静脉血栓,余10例病人术后随访9～15个月,右肝静脉均通畅,未发现静脉血栓,架桥肝静脉累计通畅率为:1个月100%(11/11)、3个月72.7%(8/11)、6个月54.5%(6/11)和9个月36.5%(4/11),移植肝脏再生均衡,右肝端面Ⅴ或Ⅷ段无明显充血和肝萎缩坏死,肝功能正常.超声检查未发现血栓,血流通畅,移植肝脏再生均衡,右肝端面Ⅴ或Ⅷ段无明显充血和肝萎缩坏死,肝功能正常.结论 采用右肝静脉、腔静脉联合扩大成形吻合技术和在4℃UW液中保存7 d以内的尸体同种异体静脉移植血管重建肝Ⅴ、Ⅷ段肝静脉粗大属支以及右肝下静脉是一种简单、安全和有效的成人间不含肝中静脉右半肝活体肝移植肝静脉重建方法.     

Modified right liver graft from a living donor to prevent congestion

BACKGROUND: Right liver grafts without middle hepatic vein (MHV) drainage reconstruction resulted in severe congestion of the anterior segment (AS) in our early experience of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, a detailed strategy for preventing such congestion or the necessity of MHV reconstruction has not been discussed in LDLT using a right lobe graft. METHODS: From July 1997 to February 1998, two of five right lobe grafts without MHV drainage reconstruction were complicated with severe congestion of the AS. Thereafter, 42 adult recipients who received right liver grafts with sizable MHV tributaries underwent the reconstruction of MHV drainage. All sizable (>5 mm in diameter) MHV tributaries were preserved during donor hepatectomy and were reconstructed with the recipient's autogenous interposition vein grafts at the bench surgery. The reconstructed vein grafts of this modified right lobe graft were anastomosed to the stump of the MHV and/or left hepatic vein of the recipient after graft revascularization. RESULTS: Serial Doppler ultrasonography, which was regularly checked until 30 days posttransplant, revealed the patent interposition vein graft in 38 of 42 recipients (patency rate 90.5%). In these 38 recipients, no evidence of congestion in the AS was recognized on enhanced computed tomography, while providing enough functioning liver mass comparable to an extended right lobe graft. Also, congestion-related graft injury, such as an infarct of the AS, was not observed in these recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Our early experience indicated the necessity of MHV drainage reconstruction in right lobe grafts, which do not have MHV trunk in certain instances. However, preoperatively, it is difficult to predict the degree of AS congestion of the right liver graft without MHV drainage reconstruction. We suggest aggressive reconstruction of MHV drainage tributaries of the AS, under the circumstances that sizable MHV tributaries are encountered, to prevent possible congestion-related complications.     

Surgical technique for hepatic venous reconstruction in liver transplantation]

In living-donor liver transplantation, one of the tactics of hepatic vein reconstruction is to obtain a long and wide venous orifice. The short hepatic vein should be reconstructed in the left liver graft with a caudate lobe. In the modified right liver graft, the tributaries of the middle hepatic veins should be reconstructed if there are no communicating veins between the middle and right hepatic veins.     

Interpostion vein graft in living donor liver transplantation

In adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), right lobe grafts without a middle hepatic vein can cause hepatic congestion and disturbance of venous drainage. To solve this problem, various types of interposition vein graft have been used. OBJECTIVES: We used various types of interposition vein grafts for drainage of the paramedian portion of the right lobe in living donor liver transplantation. METHODS: From June 1996 to June 2003, 37 of 176 patients (128 adults, 48 pediatric) who underwent LDLT received vein grafts for drainage of segments V, VIII, or the inferior portion of the right lobe. RESULTS: In 36 adult cases the reconstruction included the inferior mesenteric vein of the donor (n = 14); cadaveric iliac vein stored at cold (4 degrees C) temperature (n = 5); cryopreserved (-180 degrees C) cadaveric iliac vein (n = 10); cryopreserved cadaveric iliac artery (n = 1 case); donor ovarian vein (n = 1); recipient umbilical vein (n = 3); recipient saphenous vein (n = 1); recipient left portal vein (n = 1); recipient left hepatic vein (n = 1). In a pediatric case with malignant hemangioendothelioma that encased and compressed the inferior vena cava, we used an interposition vein graft to replace the inferior vena cava. CONCLUSION: Various types of interposition vein grafts can be used in living donor liver transplantation. Cryopreserved cadaveric iliac vein and artery are useful to solve these drainage problems.