Psychological disorders and dental anxiety in a young adult population

OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that some individuals who are fearful or anxious about dental treatment have a constitutional vulnerability to anxiety disorders as evidenced by the presence of multiple fears, generalized anxiety or panic disorders. This paper compares the prevalence of psychological disorders among dentally anxious and non-anxious groups drawn from the general population. METHODS: Data were obtained as part of a birth cohort study when study members were aged 18 years. They were assessed using the Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS) and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS). The disorders diagnosed by the DIS were major depressive episode, dysthymia, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, social phobia, simple phobia, obsessive compulsive disorder, conduct disorder, cannabis and alcohol dependence. RESULTS: Overall, 12.5% of study members had DAS scores of 13 or more and were considered to be dentally anxious. Those who were dentally anxious were more likely than the non-anxious to be diagnosed with one or more psychological disorders (55.0% vs. 42.3%). However, those with DAS scores of 13 or 14 (moderately dentally anxious) were broadly similar to the non-anxious in terms of their psychological profile. This excess prevalence of psychological disorder was largely accounted for by high rates of disorder among those with DAS scores of 15 or more (highly dentally anxious). The highly anxious were more likely than the non-anxious to have a diagnosis of conduct disorder, agoraphobia, social phobia, simple phobia or alcohol dependence. Odds ratios ranged from 2.8 to 5.0 after controlling for the effects of gender. The data also suggested that dentally anxious individuals with psychological disorders were more likely to maintain their anxiety over time. CONCLUSIONS: In this population of young adults, high rates of psychological disorder were characteristic of those with high levels of dental anxiety. Psychological disorder was related to the maintenance of dental anxiety over time.     

Emergency dental clinic patients in South Devon, their anxiety levels, expressed demand for treatment under sedation and suitability for management under sedation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the anxiety levels of patients attending two salaried dental service emergency clinics, their expressed demand for treatment under sedation, and their medical suitability for dental sedation. DESIGN: A questionnaire survey, incorporating the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) and assessment of American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) physical status classification, of all adult patients attending two emergency dental clinics in Torquay and Newton Abbot. RESULTS: 513 patients returned questionnaires. Only five declined to take part in the study. The mean MDAS for patients attending the two emergency dental clinics was 14.09 (SD 6.04) and 41.9% of patients were classified as dentally anxious (MDAS >15). A preference for treatment under sedation was expressed by 56.3%, of all patients, of whom 50.5% were classified as ASA 1 (without health problems) and would have been suitable for sedation in primary dental care. CONCLUSIONS: The reported dental anxiety levels of patients attending the two emergency dental clinics were found to be much higher than those found by previous studies in general dental practice and at dental school emergency clinics. There was a high expressed demand for treatment under sedation. Further studies are needed to assess the levels of dental anxiety seen at other dental emergency clinics and a health needs assessment to determine need as opposed to expressed demand.     

Do dental anxiety questionnaires raise anxiety in dentally anxious adult patients? A two-wave panel study.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether or not dentally anxious patients attending the dentist for an appointment become more anxious when completing a dental anxiety questionnaire. BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: Patients were initially screened to include only those who were dentally anxious. A pre- and post-test was planned with the completion of the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) questionnaire as the intervention. CLINICAL SETTING: Two dental access centres in the North West of England. PARTICIPANTS: Initially, 583 patients were screened. Of these, 182 (31%) were found to be dentally anxious and were recruited into the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Scale Short Form. RESULTS: State anxiety did not change with the completion of the MDAS questionnaire in either designated dental phobics (MDAS >or=19) or those classified as non-phobics (MDAS <19). CONCLUSIONS: The MDAS can be used to assess dental anxiety without raising anxiety in patients with or without self-reported dental phobia.     

Unravelling referral paths relating to the dental care of children: a study in Liverpool.

OBJECTIVE: To describe primary care referral networks relating to children's dental care and the main influences on referral decisions taken by dentists working in a primary care setting. DESIGN: A postal questionnaire to all 130 general dental practitioners (GDPs) in contract with Primary Care Trusts (PCTs), and 24 Community Dental Service (CDS) dentists in Liverpool. OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics of patient groups and factors influencing the choice of referral pathway of children referred from primary dental care. RESULTS: There were good responses rates (110 [85%] GDPs and 22 [92%] CDS dentists). The two main reasons why GDPs referred children to hospitals were (a) for treatment under general anaesthetic (GA) or relative analgesia (RA) and (b) for restorative care of dentally anxious children. GDPs also referred anxious children requiring simple restorative care and/or RA to the CDS. Only eight GDPs (7%) cited a lack of experience as a reason for referral of dentally anxious children for simple restorative care, compared to 53 (48%) who cited a lack of RA facilities, and 25 (23%) who cited financial considerations. CONCLUSIONS: GDPs refer children to both hospital services and the CDS, and identify a lack of RA facilities and economic pressures as key reasons for referral.     

Age of onset of dental anxiety

Little attention has been given to the issue of the age of onset of dental anxiety, even though it may have a bearing on the origins of this type of fear. This study aimed to identify the age of onset of dental anxiety and to identify differences by age of onset with respect to potential etiological factors, such as negative dental experiences, family history of dental anxiety, and general psychological states. Data were collected by means of two mail surveys of a random sample of the adult population. Of 1420 subjects returning questionnaires, 16.4% were dentally anxious. Half, 50.9%, reported onset in childhood, 22.0% in adolescence, and 27.1% in adulthood. Logistic regression analyses indicated that negative dental experiences were predictive of dental fear regardless of age of onset. A family history of dental anxiety was predictive of child onset only. Adolescent-onset subjects were characterized by trait anxiety and adult-onset subjects by multiple severe fears and symptoms indicative of psychiatric problems. The three groups were similar in terms of their physiological, cognitive, and behavioral responses to dental treatment. However, adolescent- and adult-onset subjects were more hostile toward and less trusting of dentists. These results indicate that child-onset subjects were more likely to fall into the exogenous etiological category suggested by Weiner and Sheehan (1990), while adult-onset subjects were more likely to fall into the endogenous category.     

The acceptability of the use of sedation in the management of dental anxiety in children: views of dental students

The aim of the present study was to determine the views of dental students concerning the acceptability of the use of sedation in the management of dentally anxious children. Dental students in Trinidad (n = 100) were asked to rate the acceptability of vignettes describing the management of a young teenager with dental anxiety. The vignettes varied systematically along two dimensions: nature of intervention for anxiety (sedation vs. the use of relaxation training and rewards) and outcome of the intervention (good vs. poor). Ratings of acceptability were made using a standardized questionnaire measure. The data were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). There were significant main effects of nature of intervention (F = 5.54; P < 0.05) and outcome of intervention (F = 298.01; P < 0.001), though the students' year of study did not influence ratings. None of the interaction terms were significant. Sedation was viewed as a less acceptable intervention than relaxation and rewards. Interventions associated with good outcomes were seen as more acceptable than interventions associated with poor outcomes. It is concluded that dental students' perceptions of the acceptability of interventions for use with dentally anxious patients are related to the effectiveness of the intervention. Sedation, regardless of the outcome, is seen as less acceptable than the use of rewards and relaxation.     

Dental fear among a young adult Saudian population

AIMS: To assess the prevalence of dental fear and reasons for irregular dental attendance among young adult university students; to describe the gender distribution of the dentally anxious population according to the perceived origins or sources of fear; to identify the time of fear development and preference for anaesthesia or sedation before dental treatment. METHOD: A questionnaire incorporating the Dental Fear Scale (DFS) with items related to sources of dental fear stimuli, together with the preference of anaesthesia or sedation before dental treatment and other characteristics. Approximately 500 questionnaires were distributed among Saudian undergraduate students. RESULTS: 368 questionnaires were completed and presented for statistical analysis. The sight and sensation of anaesthetic needles and the sight, sound and sensation of the drill were rated the most fear-eliciting stimuli. Also, females tended to be more anxious than males. Increased heart rate was the most common reported physiological response to fear resulting from dental treatment. The overall level of fear of dental work among the studied population was found to be about 39%.'Lack of time' and 'no need for treatment' were found to be the main reasons for irregular dental visits. Fear of pain and trauma were the major perceived sources of reported fear reactions and were developed mainly during childhood. About 63% of the subjects preferred to have local anaesthesia before dental treatment to prevent or ameliorate dental fear.     

Dental caries, age and anxiety: factors influencing sedation choice for children attending for emergency dental care

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine how physical (dental caries) and psychosocial (age, dental anxiety and dental health behaviour) factors, associated with child and parent, influenced dentists' sedation choice when a child presents in pain. METHODS: 600 parents whose children were aged between 5 and 11 years took part: 200 attended for routine dental care (RDC); the remaining 400 attended as emergency patients and were offered either dental general anaesthesia (DGA) or relative analgesia (RA). The subjects were approached and invited to take part. The researcher was blind as to the child's pattern of dental attendance and the type of sedation offered. All parents and children completed self-reported ratings of dental anxiety. The children's teeth were examined to determine past and present dental caries experience. RESULTS: The results showed that children who were offered DGA had greater experience of dentinal caries, were younger and dentally anxious. The children offered RA were older, had a higher frequency of brushing their teeth with fluoride toothpaste and were also dentally anxious. Discriminant analysis showed that 2 canonical functions provided clear categorisation of the three treatment groups. Function 1 was a physical (dental caries) factor, which was related to the child's experience of dentinal caries. Function 2 was a psychosocial factor, which was related to the child's age, dental anxiety and frequency of tooth brushing. A greater proportion of the variance in the treatment offered was explained by Function 1, suggesting that the most important factor in the decision to offer DGA was dentinal caries. Function 2 was of lesser importance. CONCLUSIONS: The findings have implications for the type of sedation offered to children presenting for emergency care. These children may not otherwise receive treatment and the need to provide less anxiety provoking forms of sedation must be promoted. By doing so, parents who have only brought their children when in pain may take advantage of RDC and the treatments offered to prevent and control dental caries and anxiety in their children.     

Clinical correlates of dental anxiety among older adults

Most studies of the relationship between dental anxiety and oral health status have used subjective rather than clinical indicators of oral health. In this paper we examine differences between older adults who are and are not dentally anxious using a broad range of clinical measures. The data show that dentally anxious individuals were more likely to be edentulous, and among the dentate, had more missing and fewer filled teeth. As a result, dentally anxious dentate subjects were more likely to need prosthodontic treatment. They were also more likely to need immediate treatment for the relief of pain and infection and periodontal care. There was evidence to suggest differences in patterns of dental treatment between those who were and were not dentally anxious and some evidence consistent with the hypothesis that aging influences the relationship between dental anxiety and oral health status.     

The West Coast Study. I: Self-reported dental health and the use of dental services.

This study examined self-reported dental health and the use of dental services in a sample of the population of the West Coast of the South Island of New Zealand. The study differs from previous national surveys in that it provides a regional focus in a relatively remote area of the country; it provides an estimate of the prevalence and severity of dental anxiety among New Zealanders, using an instrument with a long history of use and validation; and it estimates the social impact of oral conditions. A questionnaire was mailed to 450 adult members of the population chosen at random from the electoral roll. The overall response rate was 76.6 percent. A dental check-up was the most commonly reported reason for the last visit to the dentist, although presentation for a specific problem accounted for 63 percent of all dental visits. Some 78.8 percent of the respondents described themselves as dentate, and episodic dental visiting was reported by 53 percent of that group. Higher proportions of episodic use of dental services were observed among beneficiaries, those on low incomes, and those who were classified as dentally anxious. Six percent of respondents had their last dentally treatment funded by public monies, and a further 3.6 percent did not have to pay. Beneficiaries and Community Services Cardholders were more likely to make up these groups. While public funding ensures access to care for a substantial number of individuals. West Coast dentists are supplementing this care by providing treatment without charge for a small number of people. Various adverse impacts of oral conditions were reported by up to 8.6 percent of respondents; more Community Cardholders reported feeling self-conscious or embarrassed than non-Community Cardholders. Geographic isolation and lack of choice of dental practitioner did not appear to be factors in determining utilisation. The two characteristics associated with poorer self-reported dental health and infrequent use of dental services were lower socio-economic status and self-reported dental anxiety. The findings of this study provide regional-level confirmation of the general findings of the 1976 and 1988 national studies.     

The relationship between anxiety and dental treatment experience in 5-year-old children

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between dental anxiety, dental attendance and past treatment history in 5-year-old children after taking into account confounding influences. METHODS: A cross sectional study of all 5-year-old children living in Ellesmere Port and Chester. All children were clinically examined and dmft and its components were recorded. A postal questionnaire was sent to parents of participating children to identify whether children attended the dentist on a regular asymptomatic basis or only when experiencing problems. Additionally parents were asked to judge whether they and their child were anxious about dental treatment. The socio-economic status of the family was measured using the Townsend Material Deprivation Index of the electoral ward in which they resided. The bivariate relationships between anxiety and reported attendance experience, past extraction and restoration history were using chi-square and t-tests. Multiple logistic regression analyses identify predictors for dental anxiety. RESULTS: A total of 1,745 children received both a clinical examination and a questionnaire and 1,437 parents responded, a response rate of 82.3%. One in ten parents (10.8b) judged their child to be dentally anxious. Anxious children had significantly (p<0.001] more caries experience (dmft 2.58 vs 1.12). Multiple logistic regression analyses confirmed that anxious children were more likely to be irregular attenders (OR 3.33, 95% Cl 2.22, 5.00), have anxious parents (OR 1.60,95% Cl 1.09, 2.36), and to have undergone dental extraction in the past[OR 3.50, 95% CI 2.10, 5.85), after controlling for gender and socio-economic status. A past history of restoration was not a significant predictor of anxiety after controlling for other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Dental anxiety is a fairly common condition in 5-year-old children in the North West of England. It is closely associated with asymptomatic, irregular attendance pattern, a history of extraction and having a dentally anxious parent. The cause and effect dynamics of these relationships need to be determined.     

Evaluation of the ability of dental clinicians to rate dental anxiety

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of dental clinicians to rate dental anxiety. A total of 104 clinicians from 24 public dental clinics in the Region of Östergötland, Sweden, examined 1,128 adult patients undergoing their regular dental examination. The patients rated their dental anxiety using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale and a Visual Analogue Scale. After the examination, the clinicians rated the patients’ levels of dental anxiety on a Visual Analogue Scale. The correlation (r_s) between the clinicians’ and patients’ ratings of dental anxiety was 0.45. Among highly dentally anxious patients, there was no correlation between clinicians’ and patients’ ratings. Dental clinicians rated dental anxiety lower than their patients did, especially if the patients were highly anxious. The ability of clinicians to rate dental anxiety was better when the clinician was older and the patient was older. There was an inverse association between clinicians’ confidence and their ability to rate a patient's dental anxiety. In conclusion, clinicians are unsuccessful in identifying a dentally anxious patient without the concurrent use of patient self‐assessment tools. A Visual Analogue Scale is a suitable screening tool in general practice for detection of dental anxiety.     

Sedation in Wales: a questionnaire

AIM: To identify the current provision of sedation in primary dental care in Wales. DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey. SETTING: Wales 2003. SUBJECTS AND MATERIALS: Questionnaires were sent to all dentists appearing on the Dentists Register with addresses in Wales (n = 1374). The questionnaires sought details on personal status, use of and training in conscious sedation techniques. RESULTS: In total 951 (69%) questionnaires were returned, 720 (90%) respondents worked in a primary dental care setting. Only 87 (12.1%) primary care dentists offered some form of sedation. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of conscious sedation services in primary dental care in Wales is poor.     

A survey of the opinions of consultant anaesthetists in Scotland of sedation carried out by dentists

OBJECTIVES: To elicit the attitudes and opinions of consultant anaesthetists working in Scotland, with regard to conscious sedation carried out by dental practitioners. METHOD: A questionnaire was designed to gauge opinion of consultant anaesthetists in Scotland on the practice of conscious sedation by dentists. The questionnaire was sent to 353 consultant anaesthetists working in 49 hospitals within the 15 health boards in Scotland. RESULTS: Of the 366 questionnaires sent, 249 were returned of which 235 were valid. This gave a response rate of 64%. In general, those questioned felt that the provision of sedation in a hospital setting was more appropriate than in general dental practice. A majority (65%) thought that it was unrealistic for anaesthetists to provide all sedation for dental treatment, although many (58%) felt that anaesthetists should take more responsibility in this area. Again, a majority (60%) agreed that dentists should be trained to use sedation techniques for their patients but a significant number (63%) disagreed with the practice of operator/sedationist. CONCLUSION: It is of concern to the dental profession that a significant number of anaesthetists do not feel that it is appropriate for dentists to be administering even the most simple methods of sedation. At present there are no clear, recognised guidelines as to the level of formal training required for the practice of conscious sedation by dentists. It is in the interests of the dental profession and the public to ensure that those choosing to practice sedation do so safely by following recognised guidelines in the training and practice of sedation.     

Referrals to a secondary care dental clinic for anxious adult patients: implications for treatment.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the methods suggested by general dental practitioners for management of patients with dental anxiety whom they refer to a dental hospital setting, the treatment modalities eventually used with such patients and the relationship between patients previous sedation experience and the current referral. METHODS: Consecutive referral letters (n = 125) for management of patients with dental anxiety over a 16 month period were analysed for content, including reason for referral and suggested treatment modalities. Patient records were also examined for previous sedation experience. RESULTS: From 115 referrals eligible for analysis, the dentists requested management of anxiety using pharmacological methods in 113 referrals with only two referrals mentioning psychologically-based treatments. In secondary care, 29% of the adult referrals opted for dental treatment using psychological techniques alone. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the efficacy of psychological treatments for dental anxiety, primary and secondary care dentists appear not to be suggesting or promoting their use for patients with dental anxiety. Further research into the availablility of, and barriers to accessing the full range of services for those with dental anxiety, including patient perspectives, needs to be undertaken.     

Treatment modalities in a dental fear clinic and the relation with general psychopathology and oral health variables.

OBJECTIVE: To assess differences among highly anxious dental patients assigned to different treatment modes (i.e. behavioural management (BM), nitrous oxide sedation (NOS), intravenous sedation (IVS). Patients were compared with regard to psychological and dental variables before treatment (e.g. number of decayed teeth), and dental variables after treatment (e.g. number of fillings made). DESIGN: Dentists experienced in the treatment of highly anxious patients allocated patients to a treatment mode based upon their clinical judgement. SETTING: Centre for Special Dental Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. SUBJECTS: 211 patients from this dental fear clinic. MEASURES: General psychopathology, as measured by the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90), and dental anxiety (DAS, S-DAI, 10-point scale) were measured prior to treatment. From the panoramic radiograph the following pre-treatment dental variables were assessed: number of teeth, number of decayed teeth, number of retained roots, and number of root-filled teeth. After treatment, number of fillings, extractions, endodontically treated elements, number of visits, and treatment duration, were determined from the patients' records. RESULTS: Of the 144 patients who received dental treatment at the clinic, 46.5% was treated using a BM approach, 27.8% with NOS, 22.9% with IVS, and 2.8% under GA. No differences among the treatment groups were found with regard to SCL-90 and dental anxiety. The results showed that patients in the IVS group had statistically significant more decayed teeth than patients in the BM group. Furthermore, more fillings were made in the IVS group than in the BM group. CONCLUSION: Since it appeared possible to treat a large proportion of patients by BM alone, training dentists in the application of psychological methods for the treatment of anxious patients should be stimulated. In addition, future research should seek for variables that, besides oral health, are better able to discriminate between groups of highly anxious patients than measures of dental anxiety and psychopathology.     

Management of anxiety in dental practice in the UK

A postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of dentists in the United Kingdom. The response rate was 59.9%. Anxiety was reported as a significant problem by 66% of dentists and information was gained regarding the techniques used to manage this anxiety. 'Patient management' and general anaesthesia were the techniques most commonly employed. The frequency of usage of intravenous and inhalational sedation varied according to the age of the patient. Only 55.3% of dentists in general practice had any training in a sedative technique.     

Dental anxiety and quality of life: the effect of dental treatment

Abstract – Objective: The aim of the present study was to determine the association between dental anxiety and quality of life (QoL) and to test the hypothesis that treatment of highly anxious patients would significantly enhance QoL. Material and methods: Subjects were 35 highly anxious dental patients of a Dutch dental fear clinic who were assessed on dental trait anxiety (DAS and S‐DAI) and QoL (oral health‐related QoL with the use of OHIP‐14, dental anxiety‐related QoL with the SADAS, and general aspects of QoL using Global Assessment of Functioning, while five different aspects of life satisfaction were quantified on a VAS‐scale) both prior to and after treatment (an average of six sessions of 45–60 minutes each). Also, both objective (DMFT and dentists’ judgement) and subjective (patients’ judgement) indices of oral health status were recorded. Results: Higher dental anxiety was significantly associated with lower OH‐QoL as indexed by the OHIP‐14 (r = 0.51–0.56, P < 0.01). Treatment was associated with marked improvement on oral health status, reduction of dental anxiety, and improvements regarding a variety of aspects of QoL (all Ps < 0.001). Reduction of dental anxiety, rather than improved oral health, was found to predict enhanced OH‐QoL. Conclusion: The results underline the importance of applying effective treatment methods for dentally anxious patients, not only with the purpose to alleviate their dental anxiety and to improve their oral health, but also because it contributes to an enhancement of their QoL.     

General anaesthesia, parenteral sedation, and emergency drugs and equipment in general dental practice

General dental practitioners were surveyed with respect to their use of general anaesthesia, parenteral sedation, and possession of emergency drugs and equipment.

Over 50 per cent of respondents used some form of general anaesthetic or parenteral sedation technique. Most of these respondents used inhalational general anaesthesia, and about 50 per cent used relative analgesia (RA) and/or intravenous sedation techniques: however, the number of administrations of relative analgesia far exceeded that of any other technique.

Over 80 per cent of respondents possessed a source of oxygen, and some 30 per cent had corticosteroids and adrenaline available for use in an emergency. The level of emergency drugs and equipment was higher for those using general anaesthesia or parenteral sedation.

General dental practitioners expressed a keen desire for the provision of advice on both the management of emergencies in the dental surgery and appropriate equipment and drugs.