Management and short-term outcome of diabetic patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction: results of a nationwide French survey

OBJECTIVES: To compare management and short-term outcome of diabetic and non-diabetic patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: This was a prospective epidemiological survey. All patients admitted in coronary care units in France in November 2000 for confirmed acute myocardial infarction were eligible to enter the study. RESULTS: Of the 2320 patients recruited from 369 centers, 487 were diabetic (21%). Compared to non-diabetic patients, diabetic patients were 5 years older, more often female, obese and hypertensive; they had more often a history of cardiovascular disease; they had a lower ejection fraction and worse Killip class. Reperfusion therapy was less frequent among diabetic patients (39% versus 51%; p=0.0001), as was the use of beta-blockers (61% versus 72%; p=0.0001), aspirin (83% versus 89%; p=0.0001) and statins (52% versus 60%; p=0.001) during hospitalization. Conversely, the use of ACE-inhibitors was more frequent (54% versus 44%; p=0.0001). 58% of diabetic patients received insulin during hospitalization. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 13.1% in diabetic patients and 7.0% in non-diabetic patients (risk ratio: 1.87; p=0.001). Diabetes remained associated with increased mortality after adjustment for relevant risk factors including age and ejection fraction (risk ratio: 1.51; p=0.07). In patients treated with antidiabetic drugs (chiefly sulfonylureas) before admission, 28-day mortality was 10.4% compared with 19.9% in diabetic patients on diet alone or untreated (p=0.005). CONCLUSION: Despite higher cardiovascular risk and worse prognosis, in-hospital management of diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction remains sub-optimal. Patients previously treated with antidiabetic drugs including sulfonylureas had a better prognosis than untreated diabetic patients.     

Myocardial infarction in diabetic vs non-diabetic subjects. Survival and infarct size following therapy with sulfonylureas (glibenclamide)

AIMS: Sulfonylureas may interfere with 'ischaemic preconditioning' and worsen the prognosis in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-seven non-diabetic patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction to one hospital over 6.5 years (72 deaths, in-hospital mortality 20.2%) were compared to 245 Type 2 diabetic patients categorized as having taken sulfonylureas (glibenclamide 7+/-3 mg x day(-1); n = 76, 25 deaths = 32.9%;P = 0.025), not having taken sulfonylureas (n = 89, 29 deaths = 33.0%;P = 0.012), and newly diagnosed as having diabetes (n = 80, 20 deaths = 25.0%). Survival was significantly different (log-rank test: P = 0.03). Increments in creatine kinase and creatine kinase(MB)activity were higher in non-diabetic patients (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality in Type 2 diabetic patients is higher than in non-diabetic patients suffering acute myocardial infarction regardless of whether or not they had been treated with sulfonylureas. Glibenclamide does not enlarge myocardial necroses.     

Do differences in baseline characteristics or in management account for the poorer in-hospital and subsequent outcome after myocardial infarction in diabetics? Data from a large unselected cohort

OBJECTIVE: There is an excess mortality after myocardial infarction in diabetics, but also documented significant differences in the characteristics of MI and in management between diabetics and non-diabetics. The aim of this prospective study in a large unselected patient cohort in a single French region was to determine if baseline characteristics, management, or in-hospital and one-year mortality differed in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were prospectively collected in consecutive patients with myocardial infarction admitted to all hospitals in three departments in the Rhone-Alpes region between September 1, 1993 and January 31,1995. Among the 2,297 patients, 410 patients (17.8%) were diabetic. Although diabetics were older than non-diabetics (70.3 vs. 67.8 years; p < 0.0004), and less likely to receive thrombolysis (31% vs. 36%; p = 0.043), in-hospital mortality was not significantly higher (17.3% vs. 14.7%) than in non-diabetics. In multivariate analysis, diabetes was a significant predictor of one-year mortality (relative risk: 1.41; 95% CI = 1.10 - 1.79; p = 0.0063) but not of in-hospital mortality (relative risk: 1.2; 95% CI = 0.9 - 1.7; p = 0.25). Multivariate predictors of in-hospital and one-year mortality in diabetics were age and Killip class at admission. CONCLUSIONS: In this large unselected French cohort, diabetes mellitus was a significant predictor of one-year but not of in-hospital mortality after myocardial infarction in a French region.This negative effect of diabetes on mortality was not related to differences in baseline characteristics, or in initial or post-discharge management between diabetics and non-diabetics.     

Prognostic significance of microalbuminuria in non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine whether the presence of microalbuminuria (20-200 microg/min) can predict in-hospital morbidity and mortality in non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three (172 men and 51 women) non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction were studied prospectively. The main outcome measures of the study were based on a comparison of in-hospital mortality and major non-fatal in-hospital events (pulmonary edema, post-infarction angina, infarct extension, mechanical complications, conduction disturbances and ventricular arrhythmias) between microalbuminuric and normoalbuminuric patients. RESULTS: A significant proportion of patients (33.6%) had microalbuminuria. Seventy-six patients (34%) developed an in-hospital event (fatal or non-fatal). Six patients (2.7%) with acute myocardial infarction died in the hospital. Patients with microalbuminuria had a higher mortality rate in comparison with normoalbuminuric patients (6.6% vs. 0.68%, p = 0.01). For non-fatal events, the incidence of pulmonary edema and ventricular arrhythmias was significantly higher in patients with microalbuminuria (14.6% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001 and 12% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.01, respectively). The combined end-point of the total number of fatal and non-fatal events was significantly higher in patients with microalbuminuria (57.3% vs. 22.3%, p < 0.001). In multiple logistic regression analysis, microalbuminuria (p < 0.001) and ejection fraction (p = 0.01) were independently related to the occurrence of major in-hospital events. CONCLUSIONS: Microalbuminuria is a significant predictor of in-hospital morbidity and mortality in non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction.     

Prognostic significance of the implantation of a temporary pacemaker in patients with acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE: Indication of temporary pacemakers in patients during acute myocardial infarction was widely studied in the pre-thrombolytic era without having determined whether the generalization of fibrinolysis might have changed the overall incidence and significance of temporary pacemakers. Our aim was to determine the incidence and the prognostic significance of insertion of temporary pacemakers in patients with acute myocardial infarction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a study involving 1,239 patients consecutively admitted to hospital with acute myocardial infarction we studied clinical characteristics and prognosis depending on temporary pacemaker insertion or not. We performed an univariate analysis on in-hospital mortality and those selected variables were introduced in to a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A temporary pacemaker was indicated in 55 patients (4.4%), prophylactically in 22% and therapeutically in 78%. Temporary pacemakers were inserted in 55% of the patients with advanced AV block and in the 10% of the patients with bundle-branch block. Pacemaker insertion was associated with higher number of affected leads in the ECG, and higher CK peak, regardless of the association with thrombolysis. The following complications were more often observed in patients with temporary pacemakers: atrial fibrillation, heart failure, right bundle-branch block, advanced atrioventricular block and in-hospital mortality (45.4 vs 10.2%; p < 0.001). Need for a temporary pacemaker was less frequent in patients treated with thrombolytics compared with those not treated (3.0 vs 6.1%; p < 0.02). Pacemaker insertion had an independent value for predicting in-hospital mortality (OR = 5.51; 95% CI, 2.71-11.19). CONCLUSION: The insertion of a temporary pacemaker in acute myocardial infarction is less frequent nowadays than on the pre-thrombolytic era. Pacemaker insertion is associated with higher indices of infarct extension and in-hospital mortality, having independent prognostic value on the in-hospital mortality.     

Prevalence and prognosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among 5,839 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction. SPRINT Study Group.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the prevalence and the clinical significance of clinically recognized chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during acute myocardial infarction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During 1981 to 1983, a secondary prevention study with nifedipine (SPRINT) was conducted in Israel among 2,276 survivors of acute myocardial infarction. During the study, demographic, historical, and medical data were collected on special forms for all patients with diagnosed acute myocardial infarction in 13 hospitals (the SPRINT Registry, n = 5,839). Mortality follow-up was completed for 99% of hospital survivors for a mean follow-up of 5.5 years (range: 4.5 to 7 years). RESULTS: The prevalence of COPD was 7% (406 of 5,839). The latter rate increased significantly in men (7.6%), smokers (9.7%), and older patients (70 years or older, 10.0%). Patients with COPD exhibited a complicated hospital course with an in-hospital mortality rate of 23.9%. Subsequent mortality rates in survivors at 1 and 5 years were 12.3% and 35.9%, respectively. Rates at the same time periods in patients without COPD were 17.2%, 9.2%, and 26.9% (p < 0.005 for in-hospital and 5 years). In a multivariate analysis that included age, gender, and history of myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure, COPD was not independently associated with either in-hospital or postdischarge excess fatality rates. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of consecutive patients with myocardial infarction, the prevalence of COPD was 7% and higher among smokers, men, and elderly patients. Although in-hospital and postdischarge mortality rates were higher among patients with COPD, this condition did not independently increase either the risk of early death or the risk of long-term mortality among survivors of acute myocardial infarction.     

Prophylactic intraaortic balloon pumping preserves left ventricular systolic function in acute anterior myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock

OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular function and prognosis were evaluated in patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention supported by intraaortic balloon pumping. METHODS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients with first acute myocardial infarction were treated between July 1999 and April 2006. Twenty-five had cardiogenic shock on admission, whereas 33 did not. Patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock were divided into the prophylactic intraaortic balloon pumping group (Group 1; n=17) and the rescue intraaortic balloon pumping group (Group 2; n=9). RESULTS: Thirty-day in-hospital mortality was 52% in cardiogenic shock patients, and 3% in non-shock patients. Baseline characteristics of non-shock anterior acute myocardial infarction were similar including Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk scores (5.1 and 5.0) in the two groups. However, average left ventricular ejection fraction in the convalescent stage was superior in Group 1 (48.7% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.03). Thirty-day in-hospital mortality was 0% in Group 1 and 11% in Group 2 (p = 0.34). Cox's hazard ratio in Group 2 to Group 1 was 2.38 (95% confidence intrerval; 0.84-11.1, p = 0.09) in terms of the subsequent major cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of intraaortic balloon pumping starting prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention preserves the convalescent left ventricular systolic function in patients with high risk for anticipated cardiac events after anterior acute myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock.     

Impact of pre-hospital care in patients with acute myocardial infarction compared with those first managed in-hospital.

AIMS: To compare prospectively the impact of pre-hospital care by a physician-staffed mobile coronary care unit with patients managed initially in-hospital, all with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a single centre registry of consecutive patients (n=750) admitted with acute myocardial infarction to the coronary care unit and cardiology wards of the Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast between 1998 and 2001. For the 750 patients, in-hospital mortality was 11% and was significantly lower for those managed pre-hospital (8% vs 13%, P=0.04): patients who received fibrinolytic therapy (n=474), the in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the pre-hospital group (7% vs 13%, P=0.02). Those managed pre-hospital had significant reduction in the median delay times (25th, 75th percentiles) from onset of symptoms to call for help 1.0 (0.5, 2.2) vs 2.0 (0.9, 6.0) h, P<0.001, from call for help to receiving fibrinolytic therapy 1.0 (0.8, 1.5) vs 1.8 (1.2, 2.5) h, P<0.001 resulting in a shorter pain-to-needle time for fibrinolytic therapy 2.3 (1.5, 3.8) vs 4.0 (2.6, 7.2) h, P<0.001. For all patients, older age, haemodynamic indicators on admission (hypotension, higher heart rate, heart failure) and managed by the in-hospital route were significant independent variables for an adverse in-hospital mortality. Although for patients aged >or=75 years no statistical significant reduction in mortality occurred for those managed pre-hospital (P=0.051), nevertheless patients in this age group first treated pre-hospital who received fibrinolytic therapy had a significantly lower mortality than those first treated in-hospital (21% vs 43%, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction seen and managed initially out-of-hospital by a physician-staffed mobile coronary care unit had significantly lower in-hospital mortality.     

Impact of treatment of coronary artery disease with sirolimus-eluting stents on outcomes of diabetic and nondiabetic patients

Patients with diabetes mellitus are at increased risk for repeat interventions and mortality after coronary angioplasty and stenting. The efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) to improve the outcomes of these patients is a focus of interest. In the first 1,407 patients treated with SESs at our institution, 492 were diabetic (insulin dependent diabetes mellitus [IDDM], n = 160 and non-insulin-dependent DM [NIDDM], n = 332). The in-hospital and 1- and 6-month clinical outcomes were compared with those of 915 patients without DM (non-DM). The baseline characteristics were similar, except for more women, obesity, previous myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, and renal insufficiency in the DM group (p <0.001). Compared with non-DM patients, DM patients had higher in-hospital (p <0.05) and 1-month mortality (p = 0.02). IDDM patients had more in-hospital renal failure (p = 0.04) and Q-wave myocardial infarctions (1.6% vs 0%, p = 0.04) compared with NIDDM patients, and higher mortality (3.1% vs 0.8%, p = 0.04) and subacute stent thromboses (2.3% vs 0.5%, p = 0.07) than non-DM patients at 30 days. At 6 months, DM patients had a higher incidence of Q-wave myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization-major adverse cardiac events, and composite of death and Q-wave myocardial infarction than non-DM patients (6.0% vs 2.7%, p = 0.01). Late outcomes between the IDDM and NIDDM groups were similar. Multivariate analysis showed diabetes and acute renal failure as independent predictors of target lesion revascularization-major adverse cardiac events. In conclusion, our data showed that, despite a reduction in repeat revascularization, coronary intervention with SESs in diabetic patients is limited by higher mortality at 1 month and a higher incidence of Q-wave myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization-major adverse cardiac events at 6 months compared with non-DM patients. Careful surveillance is required in IDDM patients undergoing SES implantation.     

Antihyperglycemic treatment in diabetics with coronary disease: increased metformin-associated mortality over a 5-year follow-up.

Mortality rates are considerably higher in chronic ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) than in those who are nondiabetics. The relationship between different types of antihyperglycemic pharmacological therapy and mortality rate in this NIDDM population is uncertain. We aimed to examine the survival in NIDDM patients with IHD using various types of oral antidiabetic treatments over a 5-year follow-up period. The study sample comprised 11,440 patients with a previous myocardial infarction and/or stable anginal syndrome, aged 45-74 years, who were screened, but not included in the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention study. Among them, 9,045 were nondiabetics and 2,395 diabetics. The diabetic patients were divided into four groups on the basis of their therapeutic regimen at screening: diet alone (n = 990), sulfonylureas (n = 1,041), metformin (n = 78) and a combination of a sulfonylurea and metformin (n = 266). All NIDDM groups were similar with regard to age, gender, hypertension, smoking, heart failure, angina and prior myocardial infarction. Crude mortality rate was lower in the nondiabetic group (11.21 vs. 21.8%; p < 0.001). In the diabetic group, mortality was 18.5% for patients on diet alone, 22.5% for those on sulfonylureas, 25.6% for patients on metformin, and 31.6% for the combined sulfonylurea/metformin group (p < 0.01). When analyzing age-adjusted mortality rate and actuarial survival curves, the lowest mortality was found in patients on diet alone and the highest in patients on metformin (alone or in combination with sulfonylureas). After adjustment for variables connected with long-term prognosis, the use of metformin was associated with increased relative risk (RR) for all-cause mortality of 1.42 (95% CI 1.10-1.85), whereas the use of sulfonylureas alone was not [RR 1.11 (95% CI 0.90-1.36)]. NIDDM patients with IHD using metformin, alone or in combination with sulfonylureas, exhibited a significantly increased mortality. Until the results of problem-oriented prospective studies on oral control of NIDDM will be available, alternative therapeutic approaches should be investigated in these patients.     

Patients treated by cardiologists have a lower in-hospital mortality for acute myocardial infarction

Objectives. We sought to determine the effect of specialty care on in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Background. There has been increasing pressure to limit access to specialists as a method to reduce the cost of health care. There is little known about the effect on outcome of this shift in the care of acutely ill patients.Methods. We analyzed the data from 30,715 direct hospital admissions for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in Pennsylvania in 1993. A risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality model was developed in which 12 of 20 clinical variables were significant independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. To determine whether there were factors other than patient risk that significantly influenced in-hospital mortality, multiple logistic regression analysis was performed on physician, hospital and payer variables.Results. After adjustment for patient characteristics, a multiple logistic regression analysis identified treatment by a cardiologist (odds ratio = 0.83 [confidence interval {CI} = 0.74 to 0.94] p < 0.003) and physicians treating a high volume of acute myocardial infarction patients (odds ratio = 0.89 [CI = 0.80 to 0.99] p < 0.03) as independent predictors of lower in-hospital mortality. Treatment by a cardiologist as compared to primary care physicians was also associated with a significantly lower length of stay for both medically treated patients (p < 0.01) and those undergoing revascularization (p < 0.01).Conclusions. Treatment by a cardiologist is associated with approximately a 17% reduction in hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients. In addition, patients of physicians treating a high volume of patients have approximately an 11% reduction in mortality. This has important implications for the optimal treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the current transformation of the health care delivery system.     

Prognostic significance of serum creatinine concentration for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Heart Institute of Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction [HIJAMI] Registry)

This study evaluated the impact of serum creatinine levels on in-hospital mortality in 1,359 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (from a Japanese prospective multicenter registry) who underwent successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Even in the patients who underwent successful primary PCI, the in-hospital mortality of patients with mild (1.2 ≤ creatinine < 2.0 mg/dl) and severe (creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dl) renal dysfunction was greater (17.1% and 34.5%, respectively) than that of patients without renal dysfunction (3.9%) (relative risk [RR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94 to 3.14, P = 0.080; and RR 4.26, 95% CI 1.48 to 12.27, p <0.0001, respectively).     

Use and outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (from the EHS-PCI Registry)

The value of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) and multivessel disease (MVD) is still unclear because randomized controlled trials are missing. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the impact of MV-PCI on in-hospital outcomes of patients with MVD presenting with CS: 336 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by CS and ≥70% stenoses in ≥2 major epicardial vessels were included in this analysis of the Euro Heart Survey PCI registry. Patients undergoing MV-PCI (n = 82, 24%) were compared to those with single-vessel PCI (n = 254, 76%). The rate of 3-vessel disease (60% vs 57%, p = 0.63) was similar in the 2 cohorts. Presentation with resuscitation (48 vs 46%, p = 0.76) and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (83 vs 87%, p = 0.31) was frequent in patients with MV-PCI and single-vessel PCI. Patients with ventilation were more likely to receive MV-PCI (30% vs 19%, p = 0.05). There was a tendency toward a higher hospital mortality in patients with MV-PCI (48.8% vs 37.4%, p = 0.07). After adjustment for confounding variables, no significant difference for in-hospital mortality (odd ratio [OR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 2.28) could be observed between the 2 groups. Age (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.77), 3-vessel disease (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.03), ventilation (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.59 to 5.68), and previous resuscitation (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.48 to 4.39) were independent predictors of hospital death. In conclusion, MV-PCI is currently used in only 1/4 of patients with CS and MVD. An additional nonculprit PCI was not associated with a survival benefit in these high risk patients.     

Significance of recurrences of new atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Although new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently recurs following the acute myocardial infarction, the significance of AF recurrences is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the incidence, clinical predictors and prognostic significance of AF recurrences following the acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 320 consecutive patients with AF following the acute myocardial infarction were evaluated and the patients with AF recurrences were compared to those with single episodes of AF in whom AF did not recur after restoration of sinus rhythm. The incidence of AF recurrences was 22.5%. AF recurrences were highly associated with congestive heart failure and worse Killip class was identified as the most important predictor of AF recurrences. Patients with AF recurrences had poorer outcome, including higher in-hospital (36.1% versus 12.9%) and 7-year (68.2% versus 48.6%) mortality. After multivariate adjustment, AF recurrence remained an independent predictor of in-hospital [odds ratio (OR) = 3.08, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.45-6.53, p = 0.001], and 7-year [relative risk (RR) = 1.52, 95% CI, 1.00-2.31, p = 0.026] mortality. CONCLUSION: New-onset AF frequently recurs following the acute myocardial infarction and our analysis demonstrated that recurrences of AF independently predicted in-hospital and long-term mortality.     

Influence of an antidiabetic treatment with sulfonylurea drugs on long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes. The LAngendreer Myocardial infarction and Blood glucose in Diabetic patients Assessment (LAMBDA).

INTRODUCTION: Patients with type 2 diabetes show a significantly higher mortality after acute myocardial infarction than non-diabetic patients. The influence of sulfonylureas on the survival after acute myocardial infarction is still under debate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Survival of 562 patients, consecutively admitted to an intensive care unit with the diagnosis acute myocardial infarction, was prospectively assessed for > 3 years. At the time of hospital admission, patients were grouped as (a) non-diabetic patients; (b) patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes; (c) patients with known type 2 diabetes not treated with sulfonylureas and (d) patients with known type 2 diabetes treated with sulfonylureas. Survival-analysis was performed according to Kaplan-Meier. RESULTS: 324 patients were non-diabetics, in 86 cases type 2 diabetes was newly diagnosed at the time of hospital admission, 77 patients with known diabetes had taken sulfonylureas (glibenclamide in all cases) prior to the acute myocardial infarction, 75 patients were on any other antidiabetic treatment. Long-term-survival was significantly shorter in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to the non-diabetic patients (p < 0.0001). However, no significant differences were observed between the patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sulfonylurea-drugs and those receiving any other antidiabetic treatment (p = 0.53) CONCLUSIONS: An antidiabetic treatment with sulfonylurea-drugs prior to acute myocardial infarction does not have negative effects on the long-term survival. Larger prospective studies will be necessary to finally clarify this question.     

Influence of diabetes mellitus on early and late clinical outcomes in saphenous vein graft stenting

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare early and late clinical outcomes in diabetic and nondiabetic patients after stent implantation in saphenous vein grafts (SVG). BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus have less favorable acute and long-term outcomes after stent implantation in native coronary arteries. The impact of diabetes on SVG stenting, however, is not known. METHODS: We studied 908 consecutive patients (1,366 SVG lesions) treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents. In-hospital and late clinical outcomes (death, Q-wave myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization rates at one year) were compared between diabetic (n = 290) and nondiabetic (n = 618) patients. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in diabetic as compared with nondiabetic patients (2.2% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.003). At one-year follow-up, target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 16.6% in diabetic and 12.3% in nondiabetic patients (p = 0.03). Overall cardiac event-free survival (freedom from death, Q-wave myocardial infarction and any coronary revascularization procedure) at one year was significantly lower in the diabetic (68%) compared with the nondiabetic patients (79%, p = 0.0003). By Cox regression analysis, diabetes mellitus was an independent predictor of both TLR (relative risk: 1.23; confidence interval: 0.96 to 1.58; p = 0.004) and late cardiac events (relative risk: 1.40; confidence interval: 1.05 to 1.86; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes undergoing stent implantation in SVG have: 1) higher in-hospital and late mortality, 2) higher one-year TLR rates, and 3) significantly lower one-year cardiac event-free survival. Thus, diabetic patients have less favorable acute and late clinical outcomes after stent implantation in SVG lesions.     

In-hospital mortality of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: data from the MITRA (Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction) registry

BACKGROUND: Advanced age remains one of the principal determinants of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to determine the in-hospital outcome of elderly (> 75 years) patients with AMI who were admitted to hospitals participating in the national MITRA (Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction) registry. METHODS: MITRA is a prospective, observational German multicenter registry investigating current treatment modalities for patients presenting with AMI. All patients with AMI admitted within 96 h of onset of symptoms were included in the MITRA registry. MITRA was started in June 1994 and ended in January 1997. This registry comprises 6,067 consecutive patients with a mean age of 65 +/- 12 years, of whom 1,430 (17%) were aged > 75 years. Patients were compared with respect to patient characteristics, prehospital delays, early treatment strategies, and clinical outcome. RESULTS: In the elderly patient population, the prehospital delay was 210 min, which was significantly longer than that for younger patients (155 min, p = 0.001). Although the incidence of potential contraindications for the initiation of thrombolysis was almost equally distributed between the two age groups (8.7 vs. 8.2%, p = NS), elderly patients (> 75 years) received reperfusion therapy less frequently (35.9 vs. 64.6%) than younger patients. Mortality increased with advanced age and was 26.4% for all patients aged > 75 years. If reperfusion therapy was initiated, in-hospital mortality was 21.8 versus 28.9% in patients aged > 75 years (p = 0.001) and 29.4 versus 38.5% in patients aged > 85 years (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this registry, elderly patients with AMI had a much higher in-hospital mortality than that expected from randomized trials. In MITRA, the mortality reduction with reperfusion therapy was found to be highest in the very elderly patient population.     

Influence of pre-infarction angina on mid-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Pre-infarction angina may reduce the extent of myocardial cell necrosis and improves the prognosis after myocardial infarction. The aim of this study was to analyze the total mortality six-month after acute myocardial infarction according to the presence or absence of pre-infarction angina. METHODS: One hundred seventy-five consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction were prospectively included, 72 (41.4%) with pre-infarction angina. They were followed for 6 months. There were 16 deaths (15.5%) in the group of patients without pre-infarction angina and 7 (9.7%) in the group with pre-infarction angina (log-rank = 1.03; p = 0.311). The hazard-risk function curves showed a higher risk of death during the entire follow-up in the group without pre-infarction angina. In the multivariate logistic regression model, the presence of pre-infarction angina does not significantly reduce the risk of death (OR = 0.43; CI 95% = 0.09-2. 22; p = 0.303). We detected a significant interaction between treatment with sulfonylureas before the infarction and the presence of pre-infarction angina (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: In this study no significant differences were observed in total mortality six months after acute myocardial infarction according to the presence of pre-infarction angina. However, the risk of death seemed to be higher in the group of patients without pre-infarction angina during the entire follow-up. A significant interaction was found between the treatment with sulfonylurea drugs before infarction and the presence of pre-infarction angina.     

Strong predictive value of TIMI risk score analysis for in-hospital and long-term survival of patients with right ventricular infarction.

BACKGROUND: While right ventricular myocardial infarction is associated with increased in-hospital morbidity and mortality, prognostic risk factors for in-hospital and long-term mortality are poorly defined. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic value of TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) risk score analysis in patients with right ventricular myocardial infarction (RVI). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a community population. SETTING: Mayo Clinic Coronary Care Unit. PATIENTS: One hundred and two patients with RVI from 580 consecutive patients from Rochester, Minnesota admitted to the Coronary Care Unit with acute inferior or lateral wall myocardial infarction from January 1988 through March 1998. MEASUREMENT: Combined TIMI risk score analysis with in-hospital and long-term mortality. RESULTS: In-hospital morbidity (RVI: 54.9% vs non-RVI: 22.2%; P<0.001) and mortality (RVI: 21.6% vs non-RVI: 6.9%;P <0.001) were increased in patients with RVI. The TIMI risk score predicted risk (per one point increase in TIMI score) for in-hospital mortality (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.51, P=0.037) and long-term mortality (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.25-1.96, P<0.001). Patients with RVI whose TIMI risk score was >or=4 had significantly worse long-term survival compared to those patients with RVI and TIMI score <4 (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital morbidity and mortality, and long-term mortality are increased by right ventricular infarction and can be accurately predicted by the initial TIMI risk score.     

Hospital outcome of acute myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: To assess hospital mortality and morbidity in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction and to compare the results between the two groups. METHODS: All patients admitted in 1999 to the intensive care unit of the Schwabing City Hospital with diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction were assessed for hospital mortality and co-morbidity. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty patients with acute myocardial infarction were admitted. Of those, 126 (38%) were diabetic and 204 (62%) were non-diabetic patients. Mortality within 24 h after admission was 13.5% in diabetic patients and 5.4% in non-diabetic patients (P<0.01). Mortality during entire hospitalization was higher in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients (29.4% vs. 16.2%; P=0.004). Diabetic patients were resuscitated more frequently than non-diabetic patients (24% vs. 11%, P<0.01). In diabetic patients, heart rate at admission was increased (91 +/- 27 vs. 82 +/- 23/min; P<0.01) and presence of angina pectoris was reported less frequently (59% (n=72) vs. 82% (n=167); P<0.001). Preceding myocardial infarction, microalbuminuria, peripheral artery disease and arterial hypertension were more frequent in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients. Diabetic patients demonstrated higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels than non-diabetic patients (91.4 +/- 78.2 mg/l vs. 45.2 +/- 62.4 mg/l; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction, early hospital mortality is increased and signs of cardiac autonomic dysfunction and microangiopathy are detected more frequently than in non-diabetic patients. The need for advanced treatment strategies early in the course of diabetic patients with myocardial infarction is emphasized.