Cocaine conditioned behavior: A cocaine memory trace or an anti-habituation effect

Whether cocaine locomotor conditioning represents a cocaine positive effect; i.e., a Pavlovian cocaine conditioned response; or, a cocaine negative effect; i.e., interference with habituation to the test environment, is a subject of some controversy. Three separate experiments were conducted to compare the behavior (locomotion and grooming) of separate groups of rats given 1, 9 or 14 cocaine (10 mg/kg) treatments paired/unpaired with placement into an open-field arena. The behavior of the cocaine groups on subsequent saline tests were compared with the habituation rates of saline treated rats. After one cocaine pairing with the test environment, the subsequent behavior of the cocaine paired group on saline tests was similar to a non-habituated control group. In the two experiments with repeated cocaine pairings to the test environment, the subsequent behavior of the cocaine treated groups did not parallel that of the non-habituated saline control groups. These results were not explicable in terms of cocaine anti-habituation effects. It is suggested that cocaine contextual cues paired with cocaine treatment can activate cocaine memory traces which with subsequent cocaine treatments are reinforced and strengthened. In this way repeated cocaine use can forge conditioned stimulus connections to the cocaine behavioral response that are highly resistant to extinction.     

Response to novelty as a predictor of cocaine sensitization and conditioning in rats: a correlational analysis

Rationale An animal's response to novelty has been suggested to be a predictor of its response to drugs of abuse. The possible relationship between an individual's behavioral response to novelty and its subsequent behavioral response to cocaine has not been subjected to a detailed correlational analysis. Objective To use a repeated cocaine treatment protocol to induce cocaine sensitization and conditioned cocaine locomotor stimulant effects and to assess the relationship of these effects to pre-cocaine locomotor behavior in a novel environment. Methods In two separate experiments, rats were given a 20-min test in a novel open-field environment. Subsequently, the rats were given a series of additional tests in conjunction with either saline or cocaine (10 mg/kg) treatments to induce cocaine sensitization and conditioned effects. Results The repeated cocaine treatments induced cocaine behavioral sensitization and conditioned effects. Correlational analyses showed that the initial 20-min novel environment test proved to be a strong predictor of an animal's subsequent saline activity level but did not predict the rats' behavioral acute and sensitized response to cocaine. When change in activity was used as the dependent variable, initial activity level was reliably negatively correlated with activity changes on cocaine tests as well as cocaine conditioning tests. Conclusions The negative correlation between initial activity in a novel environment and the change in activity induced by cocaine indicates that low responders to environmental novelty tend to have the strongest response to cocaine. These results appear consistent with the classic initial value and response rate dependent analyses of stimulant drug effects.     

Stimulus gated cocaine sensitization: interoceptive drug cue control of cocaine locomotor sensitization

Repeated cocaine treatments typically generate sensitization effects which are environment specific. In this study, we investigated whether drug treatments with highly selective receptor specificity can also function as contextual cues to control the expression of cocaine sensitization effects. Two experiments were conducted in which separate groups of rats (N=10) received ten paired or unpaired cocaine (10.0 mg/kg) treatments. In the experiments, autoreceptor preferring low doses of either the 5-HT1A agonist, 8-OHDPAT (8OH) (0.05 mg/kg) or the D1/D2 agonist apomorphine (APO) (0.05 mg/kg) were administered 20 min prior to cocaine administration and test environment placement (paired treatment). Under these conditions, the drug cues generated by the 8OH/APO treatments were associated with the cocaine stimulant effect in the test environment. The unpaired treatment groups received the same drug treatments but the cocaine was administered after testing, in the homecage. Consequently, for these groups, the 8OH/APO drug cues generated by the drug treatments would not become associated with the cocaine stimulant effect in the test environment. Critically, both 8OH and APO pretreatments elicited equivalent unconditioned response effects which were opposite to the cocaine unconditioned response effects; that is, behavioral inhibition vs. behavioral stimulation. Initially, the 8OH and APO pretreatments prevented the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine; but, these inhibitory effects were reversed in the paired groups with repeated cocaine treatments, consistent with the emergence of cocaine sensitization effects. In the unpaired 8OH and APO pretreatment groups, behavioral suppression persisted throughout the treatment protocol. Subsequently, paired and unpaired groups were compared in four conditioning/sensitization tests. The conditioning tests included: a saline/saline test; and a 8OH/saline test (Experiment 1); and, a saline/saline test and a APO/saline test (Experiment 2). There were no paired/unpaired group differences in these conditioning tests. The sensitization tests included: a saline/cocaine test; and a 8OH/cocaine test (Experiment 1); and, a saline/cocaine test and a APO/cocaine test (Experiment 2). There were no paired/unpaired group differences in the saline/cocaine test for sensitization but paired/unpaired group differences were found in both the 8OH/cocaine and APO/cocaine sensitization tests. In these tests the paired but not the unpaired groups exhibited cocaine locomotor sensitization effects. Critically when, in an additional test, the pretreatments in the cocaine tests were reversed (i.e., 8OH paired group received APO and APO paired group received 8OH prior to cocaine), then there was no evidence for cocaine sensitization. Since the 8OH/APO pretreatments had equivalent inhibitory response effects, it was the stimulus properties of these drugs which controlled the expression of the cocaine locomotor sensitization effects. These findings support the critical role of associative processes in the stimulus-gating of psychostimulant drug sensitization. Importantly, this report incorporates a new methodology in which context can be specified in terms of highly specific brain receptor targets rather than in terms of global environmental situational cues.     

Cocaine-conditioned behavioral effects: a role for habituation processes

Cocaine has potent locomotor stimulant effects in rodents, which seemingly can become conditioned to test environment cues. In two experimental protocols, we measured the effects of cocaine on locomotor activity and grooming behavior, and subsequently tested whether these cocaine effects became conditioned to contextual cues. In the first experiment, three groups of rats received 14 injections of either saline or cocaine (10 mg/kg) paired or unpaired to the test environment. Cocaine increased locomotion and decreased grooming during treatment and on the conditioning test. Over the course of the treatment phase, however, the saline- and cocaine-unpaired groups but not the cocaine paired group developed progressively lower locomotion and higher grooming scores indicative of substantial habituation effects. To examine whether the cocaine may have impaired the acquisition of habituation effects rather than induce a Pavlovian cocaine conditioned response, an additional experiment was conducted in which two additional non-habituation saline and cocaine control groups were added to the experimental design. On a conditioning test, the two non-habituation control groups were equivalent in activity and grooming behavior to the cocaine-paired group. The findings were consistent with a failure by cocaine-paired animals to acquire habituation effects, which could transfer to the non-cocaine state. The connection between cocaine and novelty/habituation may have substantial importance for understanding cocaine effects.     

Cocaine conditioning and sensitization: the habituation factor

The behavioral and neurobiological impact of cocaine can be strongly influenced by the environmental context in which the cocaine effects are experienced. In this report, we present the results of an experimental study in which the effects of environmental context in terms of novelty/familiarity upon locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine were examined. In the first phase of the study, two groups of na?ve rats (N=10/group) received either cocaine (10 mg/kg) or saline immediately prior to a 20-min test in a novel open-field environment. After three daily cocaine/saline test sessions, both groups received a saline test to evaluate cocaine conditioned drug effects. In the second phase, two groups (N=10/group) were administered a 20-min saline test 1 day prior to receiving the same cocaine and saline testing regimen as in the first phase. Cocaine sensitization effects were not observed when the cocaine treatments were initiated in a novel environment but were observed when the same cocaine treatments were preceded 1 day by a single 20-min test environment exposure. The maximal locomotion sensitization effects observed, however, did not exceed the locomotor stimulant effects induced by cocaine administered in a novel environment. Thus, the cocaine sensitization manifested following a brief 20-min exposure to the test environment 1 day prior to cocaine administration represented a reversal of an inhibitory habituation effect. Cocaine-conditioned effects were also observed in both phases. These cocaine conditioned effects approximated, but did not exceed, the activation effects generated by a novel environment.     

Cocaine conditioning: reversal by autoreceptor dose levels of 8-OHDPAT

In order to investigate the contribution of serotonergic effects of cocaine to Pavlovian conditioning of cocaine locomotor stimulant effects, two experiments were conducted in which groups of rats (N = 10) received cocaine treatments (10 mg/kg) paired or unpaired to placement in an open-field environment. Initially, a cocaine conditioned locomotion stimulant effect was established. Next, additional Coc-P and Coc-UP pairings were carried out in conjunction with pretreatment injections of the 5-HT_1A agonist, 8-OHDPAT (0.01, 0.025 and 0.05 mg/kg) or saline. In experiment 1, the Coc-P group which received the saline pretreatment again exhibited conditioning but in the 8-OHDPAT pretreatment Coc-P group conditioning was eliminated. In the second experiment, the protocol of the first experiment was repeated but expanded in the post-conditioning phase to include an 8-OHDPAT plus the 5-HT_1A antagonist pretreatment Coc-P group. As in the first experiment, the 8-OHDPAT pretreatment Coc-P group did not exhibit a cocaine conditioned locomotion stimulant effect; whereas, the saline pretreatment Coc-P and the 8-OHDPAT plus WAY-100635 pretreatment Coc-P groups did exhibit the cocaine conditioned locomotion stimulant effect. These findings are consistent with an important role for serotonin in the maintenance of cocaine Pavlovian conditioned effects.     

Conditioned locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine in rats do not result from interference with habituation

RATIONALE: Classical conditioning has been proposed to account for the hyperactivity observed in drug-free rats when placed in an environment previously paired with cocaine administration. However, an alternative explanation is that hyperactivity results from an inability of rats to habituate to the environment under the influence of cocaine. OBJECTIVES: In this study, preconditioning exposure to the test environment was increased from one session (standard procedure) to seven (modified procedure) to test the "antihabituation" hypothesis. METHODS: After preconditioning exposure, six conditioning sessions took place over a 10-day to 13-day period. Paired rats received 10 mg/kg cocaine i.p. prior to activity sessions and saline i.p. upon return to the colony room. Unpaired rats received saline prior to and cocaine after activity sessions. Time-off rats were withheld from the activity boxes, but were subject to all other procedures during conditioning. On the test day, all rats received saline prior to activity sessions. RESULTS: In the standard procedure, paired rats exhibited significantly greater activity than unpaired rats on the test day, consistent with previous reports. In the modified procedure, mean activity (all rats) decreased between the first and last preconditioning sessions. Still, the paired group exhibited greater activity than the unpaired group on the test day, suggesting that a conditioned stimulant effect developed in habituated rats. Activity in the time-off group did not significantly differ from the unpaired group demonstrating the habituation had not dissipated over this time period. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the conclusion that hyperactivity observed on the test day was not a result of antihabituation effects of cocaine.     

Evidence for Pavlovian conditioning of cocaine-induced responses linked to emotional behavioral effects

The pairing of cocaine treatments with a specific test environment typically leads to cocaine-conditioned drug effects. In this study, we first pre-exposed rats 10 times to an open-field environment to establish an habituation asymptote in locomotor activity prior to the initiation of cocaine treatments. Two groups (N=10) equated for locomotion, grooming, central zone penetrations and rearing behavior were used. One group received five pairings of cocaine (10.0 mg/kg) and the second group five pairings of saline injections with placements in the open-field environment. Subsequently, both groups received a saline test to detect possible cocaine-conditioned behavioral effects. During the cocaine treatment phase, cocaine enhanced locomotion and central zone penetrations but decreased rearing and grooming. On the conditioning test, the cocaine group exhibited enhanced central zone penetrations and decreased grooming as compared to the saline group. There were no group differences in locomotion or rearing. When within group comparisons were performed between behavioral responses on the pre-conditioning test vs. the conditioning test, the saline group scores were essentially unchanged. In contrast, the cocaine group exhibited higher central zone penetrations and decreased grooming without changes in locomotion or rearing. In that a cocaine conditioning test can also be viewed as a cocaine withdrawal test, two additional experiments were conducted using an unpaired conditioning protocol to test for withdrawal effects without conditioning. These results indicated that the central zone and grooming effects observed in the conditioning protocol were not withdrawal effects. Altogether, these findings provide support for Pavlovian conditioning of cocaine-induced changes in emotion-related behavioral responses.     

Novel Cues Reinstate Cocaine-Seeking Behavior and Induce Fos Protein Expression as Effectively as Conditioned Cues

Cue reinstatement of extinguished cocaine-seeking behavior is a widely used model of cue-elicited craving in abstinent human addicts. This study examined Fos protein expression in response to cocaine cues or to novel cues as a control for activation produced by test novelty. Rats were trained to self-administer cocaine paired with either a light or a tone cue, or received yoked saline and cue presentations, and then underwent daily extinction training. They were then tested for reinstatement of extinguished cocaine-seeking behavior elicited by response-contingent presentations of either the cocaine-paired cue or a novel cue (that is, tone for those trained with a light or vice versa). Surprisingly, conditioned and novel cues both reinstated responding and increased Fos similarly in most brain regions. Exceptions included the anterior cingulate, which was sensitive to test cue modality in saline controls and the dorsomedial caudate-putamen, where Fos was correlated with responding in the novel, but not conditioned, cue groups. In subsequent experiments, we observed a similar pattern of reinstatement in rats trained and tested for sucrose-seeking behavior, whereas rats trained and tested with the cues only reinstated to a novel, and not a familiar, light or tone. The results suggest that novel cues reinstate responding to a similar extent as conditioned cues regardless of whether animals have a reinforcement history with cocaine or sucrose, and that both types of cues activate similar brain circuits. Several explanations as to why converging processes may drive drug and novel cue reinforcement and seeking behavior are discussed.     

Conditioned suppression with cocaine as the unconditioned stimulus

A conditioned-suppression procedure was used to study drug conditioning using cocaine as the unconditioned stimulus (UCS). Rats were first trained to nose poke for food-reinforcement during daily 60-min sessions. At least 1 week following jugular vein catheterization, a 5-min tone-light compound stimulus was presented 30 min into the food-reinforcement session. Two minutes after the onset of the stimulus, either 0 (saline), 1.0, 3.0 or 5.6 mg/kg cocaine, was administered i.v. to separate groups of rats. For another group, the stimulus was presented, and the 5.6 mg/kg dose of cocaine was injected in an unpaired fashion (i.e., at different times). After 5 days of training a test was given with the tone-light stimulus presented alone. No disruption of responding during the tone-light stimulus was observed in the saline and 1.0 mg/kg cocaine groups or for the unpaired group. When the tone-light stimulus was paired with 5.6 mg/kg cocaine; however, it produced nearly a 50% reduction in responding, which then gradually extinguished when the stimulus was presented alone for 5 days. The 3.0 mg/kg cocaine group produced intermediate suppression. When the tone-light compound stimulus was shortened to 70 s and the interstimulus interval (ISI) was 0, 30, or 60 s in three separate groups of rats, the most robust conditioned suppression was observed at the 60 s ISI. Therefore, the conditioned suppression procedure, using 3.0 or 5.6 mg/kg i.v. cocaine doses as the UCS, produced robust conditioning effects comparable to other drugs and more conventional reinforcers. The conditioned suppression procedure may be a useful model for studying the classically conditioned effects of cocaine.     

Short-term contextual sensitisation and conditioned hyperkinesia produced by cocaine in suckling rats aged 4-10 days and 14-20 days

Rationale: Long-term exposure to nicotine is associated with chronic tolerance to its acute effects, adaptation that may lead to tobacco dependence. The time course for loss of this tolerance after cessation of exposure is not known in humans but could relate to risk of smoking relapse. Objectives: We examined changes in responses to nicotine as a function of days, weeks, or years of smoking cessation in formerly dependent smokers to determine at what point sensitivity to nicotine is reinstated (i.e., loss of tolerance). Methods: Acute subjective, cardiovascular, performance, and reinforcing (self-administration) effects of nicotine nasal spray (0–20 μg/kg) were assessed prospectively in men and women smokers before and then day-by-day (study 1) or 3 weeks (study 2) after stopping smoking. A smoking resumption period (study 1) and a group of non-quitting smokers (study 2) were included to control for the passage of time. These effects were also compared cross-sectionally between those who had quit for 1–4 years and those who had for 6–19 years in a separate sample of long-time ex-smokers to determine whether lengthier abstinence causes greater loss of tolerance (study 3). Results: No clear loss of tolerance was observed on any measure in studies 1 or 2, suggesting that chronic tolerance is fully maintained for at least weeks after quitting smoking. Sensitivity to nicotine's effects was also not different as a function of years quit in study 3. Conclusions: Chronic tolerance to nicotine is not lost within several weeks of quitting smoking and may not change even after years of abstinence from tobacco use. Electronic Publication     

Conditioned compensatory response to ethanol as indicated by locomotor activity in rats

Spontaneous motor activity (SMA) was used to investigate conditioned tolerance to the depressant effect of ethanol, and conditioned responses to stimuli predicting ethanol injection. Rats were injected with saline or ethanol at 800 or 1600 mg/kg, on alternate days, in two distinctly different locations, over a period of 20 conditioning days. The two ethanol doses were administered to separate groups of rats, but conditioned effects were determined by within-subject comparisons. Conditioned SMA responses (rearing and ambulatory activity) were measured after injection of saline in the location previously paired with ethanol treatment, and conditioned tolerance was determined by observing ethanol effects in rats tested in the environment previously paired with saline treatment. Ethanol-paired stimuli increased SMA (both activity measures, both dose-groups) during the conditioned response test. Absence of these conditioned stimuli during the tolerance test resulted in greater behavioral depression with the 800 mg/kg ethanol dose for both the rearing and ambulation measures; however, this effect was seen with the 1600 mg/kg dose for the rearing measure only. These results provide further evidence that Pavlovian conditioning is involved in tolerance to the depressant action of ethanol on overt behavior, and demonstrate the presence of such conditioned compensatory responses in the absence of ethanol treatment.     

The ability of environmental context to facilitate psychomotor sensitization to amphetamine can be dissociated from its effect on acute drug responsiveness and on conditioned responding.

Doses of amphetamine or cocaine that fail to induce psychomotor sensitization when given to a rat in its home cage can produce robust sensitization if given immediately following placement into a relatively novel, distinct environment. A drug-associated context can serve as a conditioned stimulus, and therefore may promote robust sensitization by facilitating associative learning processes. We examined this hypothesis by habituating rats to the test environment for 1 or 6--8 hr prior to each drug injection, which degrades the ability of environmental context to serve as an effective conditioned stimulus. When 0.5 mg/kg of amphetamine was administered intravenously immediately after placement into a distinct environment there was a large acute psychomotor response (rotational behavior) on the first test day, and robust sensitization developed with repeated daily injections. When the same treatment was administered in the home cage, there was a small acute response and no sensitization developed. The enhanced acute response seen in the distinct environment was significantly attenuated by 1 hr of habituation to the test environment, and completely abolished by 6--8 hr of habituation. Also, as little as 1 hr of habituation completely prevented the development of a conditioned rotational response. In contrast, neither 1 nor 6--8 hr of habituation had any effect on the ability of amphetamine to induce robust behavioral sensitization. It is concluded that the ability of a distinct environment to facilitate sensitization to amphetamine can be dissociated from its effect on acute drug responsiveness and from the ability of drug-associated environmental stimuli to elicit a conditioned response. Possible mechanisms by which a distinct environment facilitates sensitization are discussed.     

8-OHDPAT effects upon cocaine unconditioned and conditioned behaviors: a role for drug stimulus effects

The effects of the 5-HT1A agonist, (+/-)-8-hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin (8-OHDPAT) upon the unconditioned and conditioned behavior induced by cocaine were assessed in rats. Separate groups (n=7) received saline, cocaine (10 mg/kg), 8-OHDPAT (0.2 mg/kg), or 8-OHDPAT (0.2 mg/kg) plus cocaine (10 mg/kg) for eight treatment sessions (two per week) in which the rats were tested for 20 min in an open-field. On the eighth treatment session, cocaine enhanced locomotion and rearing but decreased grooming. 8-OHDPAT also decreased grooming and, when given in combination with cocaine, enhanced locomotion but attenuated cocaine-induced rearing. The two 8-OHDPAT groups differed substantially from each other and from the cocaine group in terms of locomotion during the drug treatment phase. Subsequently, all groups received a series of conditioning tests in which they received saline, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg/kg 8-OHDPAT prior to testing. Groups which had received either 8-OHDPAT or cocaine prior to the conditioning tests exhibited equivalent conditioned effects on the saline conditioning test. When conditioning tests were conducted with 8-OHDPAT, however, only the group which had previously received the combined 0.2 mg/kg 8-OHDPAT plus cocaine treatment exhibited a conditioned response and this effect only occurred at the 0.2 8-OHDPAT dose level. These observations indicate the important influence of the stimulus properties of drugs for the study of drug conditioning and for understanding drug interactions with cocaine.     

Environment-specific conditioning and sensitization with (+)-amphetamine

Learning variables have an important role in determining the behavioral effects of some pharmacological treatments. Environmental control of sensitization and conditioning of the stimulant effects of (+)-amphetamine (AMPH) were studied in two experiments. Rats were given 6 1-hr habituation sessions in automated activity chambers conducted every second day. Two days later the 12 rats in the paired group in each study received AMPH (2.0 mg/kg) followed immediately by placement in the chambers for 1 hr whereas rats in the unpaired groups received saline. All rats were injected the following day and left in their home cages afterwards. At this time the paired groups received saline and the unpaired groups received AMPH. Three days later a second pairing and subsequent home cage injection was administered, using the same procedure. Immediately prior to the test session (4 days after the last pairing session) all rats in the sensitization experiment received AMPH and those in the conditioning study received saline. During pairing sessions AMPH treated rats exhibited more vertical activity than controls. On the saline test session in the conditioning study there was still a significant group difference demonstrating environment-specific conditioning. There was no evidence of sensitization on vertical activity; however, a significant difference in horizontal activity was seen on the AMPH test session. Results suggest that these two phenomena can be dissociated behaviorally and may not follow the same time-course.     

Serotonin2C receptors (5-HT2C R) control expression of cocaine-induced conditioned hyperactivity

Environmental cues can become classically conditioned to cocaine exposure and are known to contribute to drug craving and relapse in addicts. The 5-HT2C receptor (5-HT2C R) has been shown to control the behavioral effects of acute cocaine administration and, in the present study, we investigated the role of this receptor in the expression of cocaine-induced conditioned hyperactivity. Rats received repeated pairings of a distinct test environment with either saline or cocaine (15 mg/kg, i.p.) for 7 days. In a drug-free test 2 days after the last pairing, expression of conditioned hyperactivity was seen in the rats previously exposed to cocaine in the test environment. The 5-HT2C R agonist MK 212 (0.0625-0.5 mg/kg, i.p., 5 min before test) significantly decreased, while the 5-HT2C R antagonist SB 242084 (0.5-1 mg/kg, i.p. 30 min prior to test) enhanced, expression of cocaine-induced conditioned hyperactivity. The effective doses of MK 212 and SB 242084 did not alter basal activity on the test session. These results suggest that the 5-HT2C R controls expression of cocaine-induced conditioned hyperactivity and suggest that such ligands may be useful in preventing relapse and promoting abstinence in cocaine-dependent individuals.     

Classically conditioned motor effects do not occur with cocaine in an unbiased conditioned place preferences procedure

Classical conditioning and behavioural sensitisation of motor activity induced with cocaine (10mg/kg, i.p.) were examined using an unbiased two-compartment conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure. Habituation of the rats to the testing environment prior to training was varied (i.e. either the rats were habituated to the environment for three 30min sessions or they were not) in order to examine a possible influence of latent inhibition on conditioned locomotion or behavioural sensitisation. Furthermore, rats were either trained with an explicit CS+ (cocaine-paired compartment) and CS- (vehicle-paired compartment), or else they were trained with no barrier between the compartments (effectively a single-compartment procedure with no explicit CS-) in order to examine a possible influence of stimulus change (training rats while confined to one compartment, but testing with no barrier between compartments). On a drug-free test day with free access to both compartments, rats previously exposed to cocaine in one compartment (CS+) and vehicle in the second compartment (CS-) spent more time in the CS+ compartment (conditioned place preference). However, under no circumstance was the rate of motor activity higher in the CS+ compartment than in the CS- compartment, as would be expected if cocaine-induced motor activity was classically conditioned to contextual cues. Whether or not increased activity extinguished with repeated drug-free exposures to previously drug-paired contexts depended on habituation experience. In addition, both habituation and current access to compartments (free or restricted) determined the presence of post-extinction sensitisation to a challenge dose of cocaine (7.5mg/kg). Classical conditioning and non-associative sensitisation, independently or together, cannot account for this pattern of results.     

Food-deprivation increases cocaine-induced conditioned place preference and locomotor activity in rats

 Food-deprivation increases the reinforcing efficacy of cocaine and other drugs within self-administration experiments. In this study, the effects of food-deprivation on cocaine-induced conditioned place preference were investigated. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to one of two feeding conditions: satiated (with ad libitum food) or deprived (maintained at 80% of free-feeding body weights). During conditioning trials, on alternate days, rats received IP injections of cocaine (0.0, 2.5, 5.0, or 10.0 mg/kg; n=12 per dose group) and were confined for 30 min in one of two distinct environments. On intervening days, the same rats were injected with saline and confined for 30 min in the opposite environment. After four cocaine and four saline trials, a 15-min choice test (with no injections) was given. During this time, the rats were able to move freely through a passageway between both environments. Relative to the food-satiated rats, the food-deprived rats showed a greater conditioned preference for the cocaine-paired environment during the choice test, greater cocaine-induced locomotor activity during conditioning trials, and a greater degree of sensitization to the activating effects of cocaine across conditioning trials. This study extends the general findings of food deprivation-induced increases in the reinforcing efficacy of cocaine to include the conditioned place preference paradigm. Received: 23 January 1996 / Final version: 4 December 1996     

Assessing learned associations between conditioned cocaine reward and environmental stimuli in the Wistar Kyoto rat

Clinical studies demonstrate that anxiety disorders increase the risk of substance use disorder. However, few studies have directly assessed anxiety as a vulnerability factor in processing of rewarding stimuli. The Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rat has been proposed as a model of anxiety vulnerability because it exhibits extreme behavioral inhibition in novel and social environments; yet, it displays paradoxical rapid active avoidance learning that is resistant to extinction. The present study was designed to characterize the acquisition and persistence of cocaine conditioned place preference (CPP) in WKY rats. In the first of a series of three experiments, adult male WKY and Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were given six pairings of cocaine (3, 5, 10, 15 mg/kg) or saline on alternating days. SD rats developed cocaine-induced CPP to each of the four doses of cocaine tested. In contrast, WKY rats demonstrated CPP when conditioned with 3, 5, and 10 mg/kg, but displayed no preference to the 15 mg/kg dose. Next, separate groups of rats were subject to an extended CPP paradigm, which included acquisition, extinction and reinstatement phases. Rats were conditioned with cocaine and saline on alternating days using either a 6/6 (as above) or 4/4 conditioning regimen. Both SD and WKY rats acquired a lasting CPP with the 6/6 conditioning regimen. Results from the 4/4 conditioning regimen show that SD, but not WKY, rats acquired CPP. Preference scores for SD rats during the cocaine primed reinstatement test were significantly different from pretest scores indicating reinstatement of CPP in this group. Paradoxically, WKY rats demonstrated a latent sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine during the drug-primed reinstatement test. Taken together, WKY rats appear to be more sensitive to high doses of cocaine and need more experience with the drug to acquire a preference than SD rats.