Monotherapy with low-dose thalidomide for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: better response rate with earlier treatment

BACKGROUND: Thalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug used in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The optimal dosing regimen of thalidomide is not known. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the overall response rate and response duration of 53 patients with relapsed MM who received thalidomide in a median dose of 100 mg daily. The aim of the study was to compare the response rates of thalidomide given as the second-line treatment to those of thalidomide given as the third-line therapy. RESULTS: Of 33 patients receiving thalidomide as second line, 13 (39%) had overall treatment response. Of 20 patients treated with thalidomide monotherapy as the third-line treatment, there were three treatment responses (15%) (P = 0.039). The median duration of treatment response in the second-line thalidomide group (12 months, range 6-60 months) was twice as long as that in the third-line thalidomide group (6 months, range 3-57 months), although the difference was not statistically significant, probably due to low number of patients. Only 6% of patients (3/53) had to stop the treatment because of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Monotherapy with low-dose thalidomide results in treatment responses in approximately 30% of patients with advanced MM. The response rate appears to be higher if thalidomide treatment is started after the first relapse or progression in comparison with the second relapse or progression. Treatment toxicity is acceptable even with prolonged exposure to the drug.     

Salvage therapy with thalidomide in patients with advanced relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Few therapeutic options are presently available for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who relapse after autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation, or for patients who are refractory to conventional chemotherapy and not eligible for salvage high-dose therapy. Thalidomide, a glutamic acid derivative with anti-angiogenic properties, has been recently proposed as an effective therapy for patients with advanced refractory disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of thalidomide in a large series of MM patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: From October 1999 to January 2001, 65 patients (46 males/19 females) from 8 Italian institutions were treated with thalidomide. Twenty-six patients had relapsed after autologous stem cell transplantation, either single (n = 12) or double (n= 12); 38 patients had shown disease progression after >= 2 lines of conventional chemotherapy, 2 patients had relapsed after allotransplant, one single patient had not received previous treatment. Sixty-one (93.8%) patients were in stage III, median b2 microglobulin was 2.9 mg/L, and median bone marrow plasma cell infiltration was 50%. Thalidomide was initially administered at a dose of 100 mg/day; if well tolerated, the dose was to be increased serially by 200mg every other week to a maximum of 800 mg/day. RESULTS: The median administered dose of thalidomide was 400 mg/day. WHO grade > II toxic effects were constipation (52%), lethargy (34%), skin rash (11%), peripheral neuropathy (14%) and leukopenia (3%). Sixty patients are presently evaluable for response; of these, 17 (28.3%) showed > or = 50% reduction in serum or urinary M protein concentration and 11 (18.3%) showed > or = 25% tumor reduction, for a total response rate averaging 46.6%. After a median of 8 months' follow-up, 15/28 patients are alive and progression-free (at 2 to 16 months), 12 patients have relapsed, and 1 patient died of pulmonary edema while still in partial remission. Among pre-treatment variables that were analyzed for their potential relationship with tumor response, only the concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the conditioned media obtained upon culture of bone marrow plasma cells was statistically significant. Plasma cells from patients who responded favorably to thalidomide secreted a significantly lower amount of VEGF than plasma cells from resistant patients (126.45 165 pg/mL vs 227.11 70 pg/mL, p=0.04). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm that thalidomide is active in patients with advanced relapsed/refractory MM and represent the basis for ongoing clinical trials aimed at testing the role of this drug as front line therapy for newly diagnosed disease.     

Combination chemotherapy with low-dose cytarabine, homoharringtonine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor priming in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

As sensitization of leukemic cells with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-csf) can enhance the cytotoxicity of chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a pilot study was conducted in order to evaluate the effect of G-csf priming combined with low-dose chemotherapy in patients with relapsed and refractory AML. The regimen, G-HA, consisted of cytarabine 7.5 mg/m2/12 hr by subcutaneous injection, days 1-14, homoharringtonine 1.5 mg/m2/day by intravenous continuous infusion, days 1-14, and G-csf 150 microg/m2/day by subcutaneous injection, days 0-14. Thirty-six AML patients were enrolled, 23 refractory and 13 relapsed. Eighteen patients (50%, 95% confidence interval: 33-67%) achieved complete remission (CR) with a median CR duration of 7.2 months, and two elderly patients continued a regimen of maintenance therapy and remained in remission for 26.3 and 14.1 months, respectively, as of last follow-up. Eight patients (22%) experienced neutropenia (median duration: 6 days; range: 2-22 days). Thirteen of the 36 (36%) developed severe infections. Grade 1-2 nonhematologic toxicities were documented, including nausea and vomiting (20%), liver function abnormality (6%), and heart function abnormality (6%). No central nervous system and kidney toxicity was observed. The G-HA regimen is effective in remission induction for refractory and relapsed AML patients and well tolerated in maintenance therapy in some subgroups of elderly patients. Further studies are necessary to elucidate optimum dose and schedule for this regimen to enhance the treatment efficacy of relapsed or refractory AML patients.     

Long-term results of thalidomide in refractory and relapsed multiple myeloma with emphasis on response duration

OBJECTIVE: Thalidomide administered as a single agent produces a response rate of about 40% in patients with refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). The aim of our study was to determine the quality and duration of such responses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients with refractory (20) or relapsed (22) MM were given thalidomide as a single agent at our institution. Most of them (70%) had previously received two or more lines of therapy, and 38% had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (43%) responded to thalidomide [11 minimal responses (MR) and seven partial responses (PR)] according to the European Marrow Transplant Registry (EBMT) criteria. The median time to response was 3 months and the median duration of therapy in responding patients was 9 months. Treatment was discontinued because of toxicity in 10 responding patients. The toxicity mainly led to peripheral neuropathy and fatigue. At the time of this analysis, all responding patients had progressed except one who remains in continued stable PR. The median time to progression was 15.6 months (range 1.3 to 70+), with a trend towards a longer duration for patients who achieved PR vs. MR (21.2 vs. 11.2 months, P = 0.11). The median duration of response was 12.4 months (range: 0.3-67+) (17.2 months for PR vs. 9.7 months for MR, P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: These results show that the effect of thalidomide in refractory/relapsed MM can be sustained, particularly in patients who achieve a greater degree of response, and support the finding that this drug can be used for maintenance therapy.     

Neurological toxicity of long-term (>1 yr) thalidomide therapy in patients with multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE: Thalidomide is remarkably active in advanced relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM), so that its use has been recently proposed either in newly diagnosed patients or as maintenance treatment after conventional or high-dose therapy. This latter therapeutic approach has risen the concern of side-effects of long-term therapy with this drug. METHODS: We analysed long-term toxicity of 40 patients (27 M, 13 F, median age = 61.5 yr) who received salvage therapy with thalidomide +/- dexamethasone for longer than 12 months (median 15, range 12-44) at our centre. All the patients had achieved at least a stable disease upon treatment with thalidomide alone (200-400 mg/d, n = 20) or thalidomide (200 mg/d) and dexamethasone (40 mg/d for 4 d every 4 wk) (n = 20). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Neurotoxicity was the most troublesome and frequent toxic effect that was observed after long-term treatment, the incidence averaging 75%. Among these 30 patients symptoms included paraesthesias, tremor and dizziness. Neurotoxicity was grade 1 in six patients (15%); grade 2 in 13 patients (32.5%), thus determining thalidomide dose reduction to 100 mg/d; and grade 3 in 11 patients (27.5%) who had subsequently to interrupt therapy despite their response. Electromyographic study, performed in patients with grade >/=2 neurotoxicity, revealed a symmetrical, mainly sensory peripheral neuropathy, with minor motor involvement. The severity of neurotoxicity was not related to cumulative or daily thalidomide dose, but only to the duration of the disease prior to thalidomide treatment, although no patients presented neurological symptoms at study entry. These results suggest that long-term thalidomide therapy in MM may be hampered by the remarkable neurotoxicity of the drug, and that a neurological evaluation should be mandatory prior to thalidomide treatment, in order to identify patients at risk of developing a peripheral neuropathy.     

Thalidomide versus dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: results from OPTIMUM, a randomized trial

Background

Thalidomide has potent antimyeloma activity, but no prospective, randomized controlled trial has evaluated thalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Design and Methods

We conducted an international, randomized, open-label, four-arm, phase III trial to compare three different doses of thalidomide (100, 200, or 400 mg/day) with standard dexamethasone in patients who had received one to three prior therapies. The primary end-point was time to progression.

Results

In the intent-to-treat population (N=499), the median time to progression was 6.1, 7.0, 7.6, and 9.1 months in patients treated with dexamethasone, and thalidomide 100, 200, and 400 mg/day, respectively; the difference between treatment groups was not statistically significant. In the per-protocol population (n=465), the median time to progression was 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, and 9.1 months, respectively. In patients who had received two or three prior therapies, thalidomide significantly prolonged the time to progression at all dose levels compared to the result achieved with dexamethasone. Response rates and median survival were similar in all treatment groups, but the median duration of response was significantly longer in all thalidomide groups than in the dexamethasone group. Adverse events reported in the thalidomide groups, such as fatigue, constipation and neuropathy, confirmed the known safety profile of thalidomide.

Conclusions

Although thalidomide was not superior to dexamethasone in this randomized trial, thalidomide monotherapy may be considered an effective salvage therapy option for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, particularly those with a good prognosis and those who have received two or three prior therapies. The recommended starting dose of thalidomide monotherapy is 400 mg/day, which can be rapidly reduced for patients who do not tolerate this treatment. (Clinical trial registration number: {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00452569","term_id":"NCT00452569"}}NCT00452569)     

Clinical outcome of treatment with a combined regimen of decitabine and aclacinomycin/cytarabine for patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia

We conducted a clinical trial of low-dose decitabine plus aclacinomycin/cytarabine (AA) treatment (DAA) for 20 patients with refractory/relapsed de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or AML transformed from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS/AML) in order to examine its efficacy and tolerability. Additionally, P15^ink4b methylation status was analyzed (for 15 patients) pre- and post-DAA treatment, and in vitro drug sensitivity tests were performed for seven patients (AA or AA?+?decitabine) to explore the role of decitabine in this combination treatment regimen. A total of 11 patients (55.0?%) achieved complete remission (CR) after DAA treatment, including 7 of whom reached CR after only one treatment course. The other two patients achieved partial remission. The median overall survival (OS) was 10?months for all 20 patients. The median OS for those who achieved CR was significantly longer than that of patients with no response (NR; P?=?0.01). The treatment regimen was well tolerated, and there was no treatment-related mortality. The mean levels of P15^ink4b methylation decreased significantly in six patients who achieved CR, whereas very few changes in P15 ^ink4b methylation were detected for the five patients with NR following DAA treatment. The data from the methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium assays showed that the inhibition rates of AA and DAA for tumor cells were identical. We conclude that induction therapy with DAA for refractory/relapsed de novo AML or MDS/AML achieved high levels of CR and improved OS and demonstrated adequate tolerance. Moreover, the decitabine component of DAA may function through a demethylation effect.     

Low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CAG regimen) for previously treated patients with relapsed or primary resistant acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and previously untreated elderly patients with AML, secondary AML, and refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation

We used the CAG regimen (low-dose cytarabine [10 mg/m2 per 12 hours, days 1-14], aclarubicin [14 mg/m2 per day, days 1-4], and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [200 micrograms/m2 per day, days 1-14]) for the treatment of patients with primary resistant acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and previously untreated elderly patients with AML, secondary AML, and refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEB-T) in addition to relapsed AML. Forty-three of 69 (62%) patients achieved complete remission (CR), including 29 of 35 (83%) patients with relapsed AML, 1 of 8 patients with primary resistant AML, 5 of 8 elderly patients with previously untreated AML, and 8 of 18 patients with previously untreated secondary AML or RAEB-T. Ten of 22 (45%) patients > or = 65 years old achieved CR. The patients who achieved CR received at least 1 course of modified CAG therapy as the first consolidation therapy, followed by various second consolidation and intensification therapies. The median disease-free survival and overall survival were 8 and 15 months, respectively, for relapsed AML; 11 and 8 months for the elderly patients; and 8 and 17 months for secondary AML and RAEB-T. Myelosuppression was mild to moderate, and other than fever, severe nonhematologic toxicity was rare. CAG as the induction therapy seems promising for the treatment of various categories of poor-prognosis AML.     

Mitoxantrone and etoposide: an effective regimen for refractory or relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia

23 adult patients with refractory or relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) received salvage chemotherapy with mitoxantrone and etoposide. The regimen consisted of mitoxantrone, 10 mg/m2/d by 30-min infusion, and etoposide 100 mg/m2/d by 30-min infusion, given 12 h apart for 5 consecutive d. Of 23 patients treated, 13 met the criteria for highly refractory disease (6 primary resistant; 4 with early relapse during maintenance; 3 relapsed and refractory to reinduction). 10 patients had relapsed off-therapy more than 6 months after achieving first CR. Overall, 14 patients (61%) achieved a complete remission (CR): 6/13 (46%) with refractory AML, and 8/10 (80%) with relapsed AML. 2 patients had a partial remission, 2 died in aplasia, and 5 were nonresponders. In responding patients, the median time for recovery of granulocyte count was 27 d. The most important nonhematologic side effect was oral mucositis, which was severe in 35% of cases. No signs of cardiac toxicity were observed. The median CR duration was 5 months (range, 2 to 12+ months). The combination of mitoxantrone and etoposide appears a highly effective and relatively well tolerated salvage regimen for refractory and relapsed AML. Its incorporation into first-line induction and consolidation programs for newly diagnosed AML patients should be considered.     

Reduction of leukocyte count is associated with thalidomide response in treatment of multiple myeloma

Fifty Taiwanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) were treated with thalidomide on a dose-escalation schedule, commencing with 100 mg/d nightly and incremented either to the maximally tolerated dose or 800 mg/d. Twenty-two patients (44%) responded, with 10 (45.5%) classified as partial remission and 12 (54.5%) minimal response (MR). Complete response did not occur. Of the 28 non-responders, 14 were progressive disease and 14 stable. The median time from commencement of thalidomide treatment to initial achievement of MR was 29 days (range, 8~155), and the corresponding thalidomide dose was 200 mg/d (range, 100~500). The median tolerated dose of thalidomide for the entire sample was 400 mg/d (range, 100~800), with only two (4%) able to tolerate 800 mg/d. Comparing responsive and non-responsive patients, statistically significant differences were not demonstrated for any characteristics except for CRP level and percentage cytogenetic change, which was slightly higher in the latter group relative to the former. Of particular interest, 18 of the 22 responders experienced transient reduction of leukocyte count preceding the attainment of significant reduction in M-proteins in comparison to only four of the 28 non-responders (82% vs. 14%; p<0.001). The median time from commencement of thalidomide treatment to attainment of minimal leukocyte count was 28 days (range, 7~150), with a mean of 2.19×10⁹/l (range, 0.96~3.35×10⁹/l). Leukopenia was generally transient, with rapid recovery despite subsequent continuation of thalidomide. Levels of other non-hematologically adverse effects attributed solely to thalidomide were generally acceptable. For 25 patients, thalidomide treatment was supplemented with low-dose dexamethasone (4 mg, every other day). Of these, 11 had relapsed from and 14 were primarily refractory to thalidomide treatment. Nine of the 25 dexamethasone-supplemented patients were responders (36%). Of particular note were the unusual events noted with this thalidomide-dexamethasone combination, including vascular thrombosis, acute cholecystitis, idiopathic interstitial lung disease and sudden cardiac death. Our results suggest that thalidomide is also effective for Taiwanese patients with refractory and/or relapsed MM. Importantly, the transient reduction in leukocyte count after commencement of thalidomide treatment may serve as a clinical predictor for response. Adverse effects should be carefully monitored when combining thalidomide and dexamethasone, however.     

Increasing the dose of aclarubicin in low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CAG regimen) can safely and effectively treat relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

It is difficult for relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients to achieve complete remission (CR). The CAG regimen [low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)] has been used to treat relapsed and refractory AML patients, and showed good therapeutic efficacy. It is unknown, however, whether increasing the dose of aclarubicin in CAG regimen could treat relapsed or refractory AML safely and effectively. We evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of increasing the dose of aclarubicin in CAG regimen, in 37 relapsed or refractory AML patients. All patients were treated with CAG regimen including low-dose cytarabine (10 mg/m² every 12 h, days 1–14), aclarubicin (5–7 mg/m² every day, days 1–14), and G-CSF (200 μg/m² every day, days 1–14) priming. After a single course of therapy, the overall response [CR + partial remission (PR)] rate of all patients was 78.4 % (29/37), in which the CR rate was 62.2 % (23/37). There was no early death. The median overall survival was 6 months (range 2–36 months). Myelosuppression was ubiquitous, but tolerated. No severe non-hematologic toxicity was observed. Thus, increasing the dose of aclarubicin in CAG regimen can be used safely and effectively in the treatment of relapsed or refractory AML.     

CTD方案治疗难治或复发多发性骨髓瘤

目的应用环磷酰胺、沙立度胺及地塞米松(CTD)方案治疗难治或复发多发性骨髓瘤(MM)。方法20例难治或复发MM患者接受沙立度胺,100~200mg/d,口服持续应用;环磷酰胺,200~300mg.m-2.d-1,1~4d,静脉注射;地塞米松,20~40mg/d,1~4d,口服。4周为1个疗程。3个疗程后,若出现疗效或病情稳定则再连续应用3个疗程;若病情进展,则停止治疗。结果3个疗程后,13例(65%)患者显示治疗反应,其中9例患者获部分缓解,4例患者获微小缓解。而5例患者病情稳定,2例进展。对病情未进展的18例患者继续治疗3个疗程后再次评价,则部分缓解13例(65%),获微小缓解5例。结论CTD是一个具有较好治疗前景的方案。     

Frequent good partial remissions from thalidomide including best response ever in patients with advanced refractory and relapsed myeloma

Twenty-three patients with advanced and heavily pretreated myeloma were treated with thalidomide. Starting dose was 200 mg/d, and 20 patients had dose escalations up to 400 (n = 5), 600 (n = 12) or 800 mg/d (n = 3), usually in divided doses. Nineteen patients were refractory to recent chemotherapy, and four had untreated relapse after prior intensive therapy. Ten out of 23 patients (43%) achieved partial response (PR; nine with refractory and one with relapsed disease), six patients had minor response or stabilization of the disease and four had disease progression. Another three patients died early from advanced myeloma at less than 3 weeks of thalidomide therapy. Of the 10 patients with PR, seven had a better response than after any prior therapy, despite vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (VAD)-based treatment in all but one and high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell support in four. Time to achieve PR was rapid in patients receiving thalidomide in divided doses (median 31 d). Responses also included reduced bone marrow plasma cell infiltration and improved general status. Normalized polyclonal gammaglobulin levels were seen in four cases. Six out of 10 patients with PR remained in remission with a median time on treatment of 23 weeks (range 15-50 weeks). Sedation was common but usually tolerable, and some patients continued full- or part-time work. Four patients had skin problems, three patients had pneumonia, one hypothyrosis, one sinus bradycardia and one minor sensory neuropathy. Thalidomide may induce good partial remissions in advanced refractory myeloma with tolerable toxicity, and should be evaluated in other settings for myeloma patients. Divided thalidomide doses seem to reduce time to achieve remission and may improve response rate.     

Low-dose thalidomide plus dexamethasone is an effective salvage therapy for advanced myeloma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The immunomodulatory drug thalidomide can inhibit angiogenesis and induce apoptosis in experimental models. It can also induce marked and durable response in advanced myeloma patients. Thalidomide has been used at doses ranging from 200 to 800 mg with significant toxicity. No data are available on the impact of low-dose thalidomide plus dexamethasone as salvage therapy for relapsed patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: To address this issue, myeloma patients were treated with 100 mg/day thalidomide continuously and dexamethasone 40 mg, days 1-4, every month. Between June 1999 and August 2000, 77 patients (median age 65 years) who had relapsed or were refractory to chemotherapy were treated with thalidomide plus dexamethasone. RESULTS: After a minimum of 3 months of treatment, 14 patients (18%) showed a myeloma protein reduction of 75%-100%, 18 patients (23%) showed a response of 50-75%, 19 patients (25%) a response of 25-50% and 26 patients (34%) a response of < 25% or disease progression. After a median follow-up of 8 months, median progression-free survival was 12 months. Thalidomide was well tolerated. Constipation (12%) and sedation (6%) were mild. Tingling or numbness were present in 17% of patients, discontinuation of treatment was required in 10% of patients. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: The association of low-dose thalidomide plus dexamethasone is active against advanced myeloma. A significant proportion of patients benefit from this treatment as a salvage therapy postponing the delivery of chemotherapy.     

Salvage therapy for acute myeloid leukemia with fludarabine,cytarabine, and idarubicin with or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin and with concurrent or sequential G‐CSF

The current salvage therapies for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are unsatisfactory. Over the past 7 years, we have used two salvage regimens: fludarabine, cytarabine, and idarubicin with (FLAG‐IM) or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) (9 mg/m² on Day 8) (FLAG‐I) in relapsed/refractory AML. Three‐quarters of patients also received concurrent G‐CSF. Seventy‐one patients were treated, 23 with FLAG‐I and 48 with FLAG‐IM. The median duration of follow‐up was 30.6 months. The treatment groups were well balanced with median ages of 48 years (range 18–70) and 47 years (range 20–68), unfavorable cytogenetics in 57% and 35%, prior allogeneic stem cell transplant in 43% and 42%, and CR1 duration <1 year in 60% and 67%, respectively, for FLAG‐I and FLAG‐IM. The complete remission (CR) rate in the FLAG‐I group was 39% with an additional 13% achieving a CRp [overall response rate (ORR) 52%]; the CR rate in the FLAG‐IM group was 29% with an additional 27% achieving a CRp (ORR 56%). The median duration of response (DOR; 16.8 vs. 8.3 months), event‐free survival (EFS; 7.4 vs. 4.1 months), and overall survival (OS; 8.8 vs. 5.0 months) trended to favor FLAG‐I over FLAG‐IM. The patients who received G‐CSF concurrent with chemotherapy had superior overall response rate (ORR; 62% vs. 29%, P = 0.026), median EFS (6.2 vs. 3.4 months, P = 0.010), and OS (8.8 vs. 3.9 months, P = 0.004) when compared with those who sequentially received G‐CSF and chemotherapy, regardless of chemotherapy regimen. The addition of GO, at this dose and schedule, to FLAG‐I failed to improve the outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory AML. The patients who received G‐CSF concurrently with chemotherapy had improved outcomes. Am. J. Hematol., 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

标准剂量去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷治疗急性髓细胞白血病

目的:探讨标准剂量的去甲氧柔红霉素(IDA)联合阿糖胞苷(Ara-C)治疗急性髓细胞白血病(AML)的疗效和不良反应。方法:14例AML患者,年龄13～70岁(中位年龄36岁),男8例,女6例。初治AML10例,难治、复发AML4例。所有患者均在治疗前进行染色体核型分析,4例染色体异常。诱导方案为IDA 12 mg·m-2·d-1,第1～3天,Ara-C 100 mg·m-2·d-1,持续静脉点滴,第1～7天。结果:1个疗程结束后总有效率92．9％(13／14),完全缓解率85．7％(12／14),其中初治AML的CR率为90．0％(9／10),复发、难治AML的CR率为75．0％(3／4),3例染色体异常患者达细胞遗传学缓解,未发生早期死亡。化疗的不良反应主要为骨髓抑制和粒细胞缺乏所致感染,未见严重的非造血系统不良反应。结论:标准剂量的IDA联合Ara-C 24 h持续静脉点滴,为初治、复发难治AML的高效、安全的方案。     

Idarubicin, cytarabine, and topotecan in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

In an effort to develop more effective therapy for patients with refractory or relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), we investigated the efficacy of a combination chemotherapy consisting of idarubicin, cytarabine, and topotecan. Twenty-seven patients were treated: four with primary refractory AML, nine with AML in first relapse, four with AML in second relapse, and 10 with MDS-RAEB/RAEBT. Patients received as salvage therapy a single course of idarubicin 12 mg/m(2) IV bolus on days 1-3, cytarabine 1 g/m(2) over two hours q 12 hr on days 1-5, and topotecan 1.25 mg/m(2) over 24 hr on days 1-5. Median age was 42 years (range 17-65 years). All patients were evaluable for response: 14 (51.9%) achieved complete remission, 10 with AML (59%) and four with MDS (40%), respectively. Thirteen AML patients (excluding four relapsed after autologous stem cell transplantation) were grouped into four categories to stratify the probability of achieving complete remission (CR): group 1, first CR duration > or = 2 years and receiving first salvage treatment (S1); group 2, first CR duration 1-2 years and receiving S1; group 3, first CR duration 0-1 years and receiving S1; and group 4, first CR duration 0-1 years and receiving S2, S3, or S4 after failing S1. The response rate of each group was as follows: group 1, one of two (50%); group 2, one of one (100%); group 3, four of four (100%); group 4, two of six (33.3%). The median remission duration and survival of patients with AML were six and 12 months, respectively. Median duration of survival in 10 MDS patients was 15 months, and all four MDS patients achieving a CR maintained continuous CR with a median follow-up of 11 months. Severe myelosuppression was observed in all patients, resulting in fever or documented infections in 89% of patients. Median time to recovery of neutrophils > or =0.5 x 10(9)/l was 22 days (11-34) and for platelets > 20 x 10(9)/l 35 days (11-58). Reversible grade 3-4 toxicities included diarrhea (two patients) and mucositis (seven patients). We conclude that combination chemotherapy with intermediate dose cytarabine, idarubicin, and topotecan has significant antileukemic activity and acceptable toxicity in salvage AML and high-risk MDS.     

Combination of liposomal daunorubicin (DaunoXome), fludarabine, and cytarabine (FLAD) in patients with poor-risk acute leukemia

Sixty-two patients with high-risk acute leukemia were treated with the FLAD regimen [3 days of treatment with fludarabine 30 mg/m², cytarabine (AraC) 2 g/m², and liposomal daunorubicin 80 mg/m²]. The acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients were either refractory to standard induction regimens (8), were in first or second relapse (13), or received therapy as first-line treatment [21 patients, 16 were above 60 years of age and 5 had post-myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) AML]. The acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients were treated for relapsed (7) or refractory disease (10). Three patients had chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the blastic phase. FLAD was well tolerated by most patients. Ten major infectious complications were recorded while no signs of cardiac toxicity were observed. Five patients (8%) died before day 28 with hypocellular marrow, mainly of infection or hemorrhage, and response could not be evaluated. Complete response rate was 62% and 69% among AML patients treated at diagnosis or for relapsed disease, respectively, and 59% among the ALL patients. Furthermore, FLAD managed to overcome the negative impact of poor prognosis karyotype in ALL patients, since five of the seven patients with t(9;22) or complex karyotype achieved complete remission (CR). Nine patients underwent bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Among the AML patients who were treated at diagnosis or for relapse, the median duration of CR was 7 months (range: 2–18) and 8 months (range: 2–26), respectively. Median survival among these patients was 8 (range: 1–40) and 12 (range: 1–30) months, respectively. Similar values were found in ALL patients. In conclusion, FLAD may be an effective alternative treatment for patients with relapsed AML and for patients with ALL who failed first-line therapy.     

Venetoclax and hypomethylating agents in acute myeloid leukemia: Mayo Clinic series on 86 patients

Venetoclax and hypomethylating agent (HMA) combination therapy is FDA-approved for elderly or unfit acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients unable to withstand intensive chemotherapy. The primary objective of the current study was to impart our institutional experience with the above regimen, outlining response, survival outcomes, and its determinants amongst 86 treatment- naïve and relapsed/refractory AML patients. A total of 44 treatment-naïve AML patients, median age 73.5 years, enriched with secondary, therapy related and ELN adverse risk disease (n = 27) were studied. The CR/CRi rates of 50% (22 of 44 patients) were superior to 23% in a matched AML cohort treated with HMA alone (P = .005). Response rates were similar with TP53, FLT3, NPM1 and IDH mutations (P = .31). Moreover, CEPBA mutations (P = .03) and neutropenia (P = .05) emerged as predictors of complete response. Survivalwas prolonged in patients achieving CR/CRi (17 vs 3 months without CR/CRi, P < .001; conversely adverse ELN risk portended inferior survival. Amongst 42 relapsed/refractory AML patients, half received ≥2 prior therapies excluding transplant, and 15 (35.7%) had received HMA. A group of 14 patients (33.3%) attained CR/CRi; age > 65 years, AML with myelodysplasia, JAK2, DNMT3A, and BCOR mutations predicted complete response. Survival distinctions were based on CR/CRi (median survival 15 vs 3 months with/without CR/CRi; P < .001), and TP53 mutation status (P = .04). In summary, we corroborate existing reports demonstrating superior response and prolonged survival with venetoclax and HMA in treatment -naïve and relapsed/refractory AML patients regardless of genotype. Additionally, we identify unique predictors of response to therapy which require validation.     

Thalidomide alone or in combination with dexamethasone in patients with advanced, relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and renal failure

Salvage therapy of patients with advanced, relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) is often limited by poor marrow reserve and multi-organ impairment. In particular, renal failure occurs in up to 50% of such patients, and this further limits the use of conventional chemotherapy. Thalidomide, both alone and in combination with dexamethasone, has been demonstrated to be useful in patients with advanced MM, as responses could be achieved in 30-60% of the cases. From May 2000 to November 2003, 20 consecutive MM patients (15 males, five females, median age 66.5 yr) with stage III relapsed/refractory MM and renal failure, defined as serum creatinine >130 mmol/L, gave their informed consent to be enrolled in a clinical trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy and the toxic effects of thalidomide. Three patients were undergoing chronic haemodialysis during the time of entry in the study. Eight patients have been treated with thalidomide as a single agent, at a starting dose of 100 mg/d, that was to be increased to 400 mg/d in case of good tolerance. Twelve patients have been treated with thalidomide at the maximum dose of 200 mg/d plus dexamethasone 40 mg/d for four consecutive days every 4 wk. A >50% decrease in serum or urine M component was observed in nine patients (45%), seven of whom have been treated with thalidomide + dexamethasone and three with thalidomide alone. Six additional patients achieved a minor response (>25% paraprotein decrease); the total response rate was thus 75%. Median response duration was 7 months (range 2-24 months). Four patients were refractory to treatment. Recovery of a normal renal function was observed in 12 of 15 responsive patients, two additional patients, in chronic haemodialysis, showed a reduction of serum creatinine. Toxicity profile of thalidomide with or without dexamethasone was comparable with that observed in patients with a normal renal function. In conclusion, our data show that thalidomide can be safely administered in patients with advanced MM and renal failure.