Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer: correlation with clinical pathological features

The overexpressed HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) is a valuable therapeutic target. Precise assessment of HER2 status is thus crucial in the treatment of breast cancer. In this study, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples of tumors from 304 breast cancer patients who underwent curative surgery procedures between 2011 and 2014 were tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a primary estimate of HER2 status, followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Concordance rate between IHC and FISH was evaluated. The Χ² test was used to evaluate the correlation between HER2 gene amplification status and different clinical pathological features including: (estrogen receptor) ER and (progesterone receptor) PR expression, age, menopausal status and tumor size. The results show that 84.8% of IHC score 3+ cases and 6.2% of IHC score 0/1+ cases were amplified by FISH. After exclusion of group IHC 2+, the concordance rate between FISH and IHC was 87.4%. There was a significant inverse association between expression of hormone receptors (ER and PR) and HER2 amplification (P < 0.001) among the patients studied. However, no relationship was observed between HER2 amplification and age, menopausal status and tumor size (P > 0.05). The data demonstrate a relatively high level of concordance rate for HER2 testing between FISH and IHC, and HER2 overexpression was associated with the levels of ER and PR.     

Assessment of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in the fine needle aspirates of metastatic breast carcinomas

The assessment of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) status in the fine needle aspirates of metastatic breast carcinomas has prognostic and therapeutic implications. In this study, expression of ER, PR, and HER2 was assessed by immunohistochemical study in 70 cases of metastatic breast carcinomas and HER2 gene amplification was further evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 38 (54%) cases. Positive expression of ER and PR was seen in 42 (60%) and 16 (23%) cases of metastatic breast carcinomas, respectively. HER2 immunoreactivity was scored as 0/1+ in 39 (56%), 2+ in 10 (14%), and 3+ in 21 (30%) cases. HER2 gene amplification was seen in 20% of HER2 2+ and 64% of HER2 3+ cases. ER, PR, and HER2 status in primary breast cancers were available to comparison in 31 cases (44%). The concordance rates between metastatic and primary breast carcinomas were 81% for ER, 65% for PR and 71% for HER2. Our study demonstrates that ER, PR, and HER2 status can be assessed in the fine needle aspirates of metastatic breast carcinomas and ER has a higher concordance rate between metastatic and primary breast carcinomas than PR and HER2. The addition of HER2 gene amplification FISH test helps in accurate assessment of HER2 status in metastatic breast carcinomas.     

Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression pre- and post- neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast carcinoma: a single institutional experience

Background

The estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 profile of a primary breast carcinoma plays a significant role in patient management and treatment. Because of the increasing utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or hormone therapy, surgically-resected carcinomas often show marked treatment effect. The aim of this study was to compare immunohistochemical (IHC) profiles (ER, PR, HER2, HER2 FISH) of primary breast carcinomas before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to assess the subsequent effects on hormone receptor status.

Design

Primary breast carcinomas from 38 female patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy after needle core biopsy or fine needle aspiration diagnosis were included. Histologic data was collected for each case, including site, type, grade, tumor size (cm), pre- and post- neoadjuvant treatment IHC panel (ER, PR, HER2), and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2.

Results

Of the 38 carcinomas studied, 45 % were positive for ER by IHC both pre- and post- neoadjuvant treatment (P=1.00). IHC studies for PR in these 38 patients showed 37% positivity for PR pre-neoadjuvant therapy and 21% positivity post-treatment (p=0.03). For 37 patients with HER2 IHC, 32% were positive pre-treatment, and 22% were positive post-treatment (P = 0.20). For 7 patients, HER2 FISH was positive in 71% pre-therapy and in 57% post-treatment (P=0.32).

Conclusions

Profiles for ER, HER2 IHC, and HER2 FISH were not significantly different in primary breast carcinomas before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further investigation is warranted to assess reproducibility of technique and investigate clinical implications of significant loss of PR status in treated patients.     

Validity of immunohistochemistry method in predicting HER‐2 gene status and association of clinicopathological variables with it in invasive breast cancer patients

Human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2 is an important and prognostic factors and one of the most targeted proteins in breast cancer's therapy. There is no globally accepted method for determining its status. Here, we aimed to evaluate the immunohistochemistry method validity in predicting HER‐2 status by Fluorescence in situ hybridization method and investigate some clinicopathological variables association with HER‐2 amplification. A total of 190 HER‐2 2+ and 3+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) invasive breast cancer cases were enrolled in this study. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed for these cases using FDA criteria and the association between clinicopathological variables and HER‐2 status evaluated. Study consisted of 190 invasive breast cancer patients (160 HER‐2 2+ and 30 HER‐2 3+). HER‐2 FISH amplification according to FDA criteria was found 27.5% (44/160 patients) in HER‐2 2+ patients and 83.3% (25/30 patients) in HER‐2 3+ patients. Tumors with HER‐2 amplification were more likely to be ER‐negative (51.0% vs 31.2%, p = 0.013) and PR‐negative (52.9% vs 27.0%, p < 0.001). This study showed that immunohistochemistry is not a good method for evaluating HER‐2 status and decision‐making about trastuzumab therapy even with 3+ score patients. However, this result may not be too strong for IHC 3+ cases due to the limited number of these patients in this study.     

Epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification and protein overexpression in basal-like carcinoma of the breast

Shao M‐M, Zhang F, Meng G, Wang X‐X, Xu H, Yu X‐W, Chen L‐Y & Tse G M
(2011) Histopathology 59 , 264–273 Epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification and protein overexpression in basal‐like carcinoma of the breast Aims: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently expressed in basal‐like breast cancer (BLBC). The aim of this study was to evaluate their correlation as detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in‐situ hybridization (FISH). Methods and results: IHC for oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2, cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 and EGFR, and FISH for EGFR amplification, were performed in 59 cases of BLBC. EGFR IHC results were scored semiquantitatively, and compared with its gene amplification status. ER, PR and HER2 were negative in all cases, whereas 35 and 55 cases were positive for CK5/6 and EGFR. For EGFR IHC, 20, 11, 11 and 17 cases showed a negative, a low, an intermediate or a high staining level, respectively, and seven cases showed gene amplification by FISH, with two, 19, 11 and 20 cases showing balanced monosony, disomy, trisomy, and polysomy respectively. Immunohistochemical expression in gene‐amplified tumours was significantly higher than in those without amplification, including balanced polysomy tumours. EGFR immunohistochemical expression also correlated with the EGFR/chromosome 7 ratio. High sensitivity (86%) and negative predictive value (98%) were achieved with high‐level immunohistochemical expression as a cut‐off to predict gene amplification. Conclusions: High‐level EGFR immunohistochemical expression correlated with and predicted EGFR amplification, and may be used as a screening method to exclude gene amplification.     

Androgen receptor is frequently expressed in HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative breast cancers

The estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-negative breast carcinomas (BCs) encompass three molecular subtypes: one with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER) overexpression, one normal like, and the triple negative. The androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in 70–90% of invasive BCs. The aim of our study is to detect the expression of AR in a series of ER/PR-negative BCs to ascertain if there is clinical significance in relation to BC molecular subtypes. A immunohistochemical study for all receptors and cytokeratin expression was performed in 232 cases of ER/PR-negative BCs. According to cytokeratin expression, BCs were classified into two groups: luminal-type BCs (44.2%) and basal-like-type BCs (55.8%). According to the expression of HER2, 59.3% were triple-negative BCs (when ER, PR, and HER2 were negative) and 40.7% were HER2-positive BCs. AR expression was observed in 128 tumors (56.6%). One hundred and ten cases (48.8%) had >10% and 18 (7.8%) had <10% of positively stained cells. AR immunoreactivity was found in 31.2% basal-like BCs, while in the luminal group 71.1% of cases were positive, showing highly significant correlation (p < 10⁻⁸). Regarding HER2 status, 76.7% of HER2-positive BC cases were AR positive compared with only 30.4% of triple-negative BC types, showing a strong statistically significant correlation. In conclusion, we show that AR is frequently expressed in ER/PR-negative BCs and that expression of HER2 and AR is highly correlated (p < 0.005). Our results point out the role of AR and HER2 in the pathogenesis of BCs and suggest the potential role of AR in clinical management of ER/PR-negative BCs.     

Analytical and clinical performance of progesterone receptor antibodies in breast cancer

ObjectiveComparison of analytical and immunohistochemical performance of progesterone receptor (PR) antibodies with correlation to recurrence of invasive breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy.MethodsThe binding-affinity kinetics of PR clones 1E2, 1A6, 16 and 636 were compared using synthetic peptides derived from identified epitopes on a Biacore T200. A cohort of 351 cases (Hormone Receptor (HR)+/HER2−) were stained for PR expression with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and scored according to ASCO/CAP criteria.ResultsThe stability of the antigen/antibody complex was greater for the 1E2 clone compared to 1A6, 16 and 636 clones. PR IHC on archival tissue resulted in 94.3% (299/317) concordance with clones.ConclusionClones evaluated in this study had a high level of concordance with IHC despite PR (1E2) demonstrating higher analytical binding properties than other clones. In a minority of cases (1.3% for 1E2 and 2.5% for 636) IHC results could convert estrogen receptor (ER)−/PR− to ER−/PR+ tumors, making these patients potentially eligible for endocrine therapy.     

雄激素受体在乳腺癌中的表达及其与雌、孕激素受体和HER2的关系

目的 研究雄激素受体(AR)在乳腺浸润性导管癌中的表达及其与雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)和HER2状态的关系,探讨其作为乳腺癌治疗靶点的可行性.方法 采用免疫组织化学EnVision法检测AR、ER、PR、HER2在175例乳腺浸润性导管癌中的表达,依据结果分为腺腔A型、腺腔B型、HER2过表达型和三阴性型(ER-/PR-/HER2-)组.结果 175例中AR阳性88例(50.3%),AR表达与ER、PR、HER2均呈正相关(P＜0.01).腺腔A型53例(30.3%),腺腔B型33例(18.9%),HER2过表达型23例(13.1%),三阴性型66例(37.7%),AR阳性率分别为56.6%(30/53),75.8%(25/33)、47.8%(11/23)和33.3%(22/66),组间AR阳性率差异显著(x2=17.054,P=0.001).三阴性型组AR阳性者核分裂象较少(x2=5.140,P=0.023),腺腔A型组AR阳性者多为年轻患者(x2=4.567,P=0.033),差异有统计学意义.其他组内AR表达与否和临床病理学特征比较无统计学意义.结论 AR在乳腺癌中有较高的阳性率,可作为乳腺癌,特别是三阴性型乳腺癌的治疗靶点.     

雄激素受体在乳腺癌中的表达及其与雌、孕激素受体和HER2的关系

目的 研究雄激素受体(AR)在乳腺浸润性导管癌中的表达及其与雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)和HER2状态的关系,探讨其作为乳腺癌治疗靶点的可行性.方法 采用免疫组织化学EnVision法检测AR、ER、PR、HER2在175例乳腺浸润性导管癌中的表达,依据结果分为腺腔A型、腺腔B型、HER2过表达型和三阴性型(ER-/PR-/HER2-)组.结果 175例中AR阳性88例(50.3%),AR表达与ER、PR、HER2均呈正相关(P＜0.01).腺腔A型53例(30.3%),腺腔B型33例(18.9%),HER2过表达型23例(13.1%),三阴性型66例(37.7%),AR阳性率分别为56.6%(30/53),75.8%(25/33)、47.8%(11/23)和33.3%(22/66),组间AR阳性率差异显著(x2=17.054,P=0.001).三阴性型组AR阳性者核分裂象较少(x2=5.140,P=0.023),腺腔A型组AR阳性者多为年轻患者(x2=4.567,P=0.033),差异有统计学意义.其他组内AR表达与否和临床病理学特征比较无统计学意义.结论 AR在乳腺癌中有较高的阳性率,可作为乳腺癌,特别是三阴性型乳腺癌的治疗靶点.     

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in gastric carcinoma: issues related to heterogeneity in biopsies and resections

Lee S, de Boer W B, Fermoyle S, Platten M & Kumarasinghe M P
(2011) Histopathology 59 , 832–840 Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in gastric carcinoma: issues related to heterogeneity in biopsies and resections Aims: To assess human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and heterogeneity using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver in‐situ hybridization (SISH) in gastric carcinoma and dysplasia, and to correlate HER2 status between biopsy and resection specimens of gastric carcinoma. Methods and results: Immunohistochemistry for HER2 was performed in 178 cases of gastric carcinoma, and SISH in cases showing at least 1+ reaction. HER2 positivity [European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines] was identified in 20.2% of carcinomas and 12.9% of high‐grade dysplasia, and HER2 heterogeneity noted in 50% and 33% of these cases, respectively. IHC negative/positive reactivity and SISH results were concordant in 96.2%. SISH amplification was seen in 35.3% of IHC 2+ and in a case with previously unrecognized staining pattern. Concordance of IHC HER2 status on biopsies and gastrectomies was seen in 74.1%. False negative IHC results on either the biopsy or gastrectomy were seen in 19.4% of HER2 amplified cases. Conclusions: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in gastric carcinoma is comparable to previous studies with good concordance between IHC and SISH; all IHC 2+ and unusual patterns should be assessed with ISH studies; heterogeneity of tumour HER2 overexpression/amplification is common with possible implications for HER2 testing; and HER2 overexpression appears sufficiently specific to be considered a potential diagnostic biomarker of dysplasia.     

Amplified in breast cancer 1 expression in breast cancer

Aims: The amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1), steroid receptor co‐activator family member, acts as an oestrogen receptor (ER) co‐activator. Acting with HER‐2, it is thought to play a role in endocrine resistance by facilitating ER–growth factor crosstalk. The aim was to analyse AIB1 expression by immunohistochemistry and study its correlations with other prognostic variables in breast cancer and its effect on survival. Methods: A tissue microarray comprising tumours from 438 patients with 15.4 years’ median follow‐up was used. Interpretable AIB1 expression obtained in 395 patients was analysed along with other prognostic factors in breast cancer. Results: AIB1 expression scores ranged from 0 to 30; positive AIB1 expression (score > 14) was seen in 146/395 breast cancers; it correlated negatively with ER (P = 0.003) and progesterone receptor (PR) (P = 0.007), and positively with HER‐2 (P = 0.005) and tumour grade (P = 0.014). It did not correlate with nodal status (P = 0.437). Among ER+ patients, AIB1 expression showed a trend towards loss of PR expression (29% versus 20%; P = 0.14). AIB1 did not predict survival on univariate or multivariate analysis. Conclusions: AIB1 expression correlates with HER‐2 expression in breast cancer and shows a trend of association with loss of PR expression in ER+ tumours. Our study supports the postulated role of AIB1 in ER–growth factor interactions.     

Stability of oestrogen and progesterone receptor antigenicity in formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded breast cancer tissue over time

Use of archived formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissue is a standard method for evaluation of proposed prognostic and predictive tumour markers. However, little is known of the preservation of biomarker expression in old FFPE tumour blocks. We investigate the quality of immunohistochemical (IHC) oestrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) evaluation in FFPE tissue over time (1978–2000) using a large breast cancer tissue microarray (N = 573) with access to receptor analyses in cytosol (CYT) at diagnosis, coexpression of other biomarkers and follow‐up data. We found a good correlation between ER analysed with CYT at diagnosis and ER analysed with IHC in archived FFPE tissue from the same tumour. ER evaluation did not seem to be affected by tissue storage time. Nor was there any time‐dependent difference in ER_IHC correlation with other biomarkers (HER2, Ki67) or survival. Discordant cases were more often classified as ER‐positive with IHC than with CYT. For PR, however, we found an increased correlation between methods in more recent time periods. This may possibly be explained by more reliable PR_IHC results in newer samples, although other explanations may also contribute. Our results indicate stable ER expression in FFPE tissue archived for up to 40 years.     

Immunohistochemical demonstration of androgen receptor in breast cancer and its relationship to other prognostic factors

Androgen actions and androgen receptors (ARs) have been described in human breast cancer cells both in vivo and in vitro. With the use of a new monoclonal anti-AR antibody, AR was immunohistochemically demonstrated in 76 primary breast cancers. Positive immunostaining was found in 79 per cent of tumours. Benign ductal epithelium was often AR-positive whereas the tumour stroma lacked AR immunoreactivity. At the subcellular level, nuclear localization was evident using either cross-linking (Zamboni's fluid) or precipitating (acetone) fixatives on frozen sections. The use of archival paraffin-embedded tissue yielded negative results. A significant association was found between expression of AR and oestrogen receptor (ER) (P=0.0006) determined immunohistochemically on adjacent sections. Most progesterone receptor (PR)-negative cases were also AR-negative (P=0.02), but significant proportion (38 per cent) of AR-positive tumours did not contain PR. Unlike ER, AR was not associated with aneuploidy or erb-B2 oncogene overexpression, and was only marginally associated with tumour proliferation rate (S-phase fraction by DNA flow cytometry). In conclusion, the close association of AR with ER and PR suggests that immunohistochemical determination of androgen receptors may have value as a prognostic factor and/or predictor of response to endocrine therapy.     

Immunohistochemical evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and estrogen and progesterone receptors in invasive breast cancer in women

Introduction

Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) expression are crucial in the biology of breast carcinoma. HER-2/neu gene is amplified and overexpressed in 15-30% of invasive breast cancers. HER-2-positive breast cancers have worse prognosis than HER-2 negative tumors and possess distinctive clinical features. The aim of this study was to assess the expression of HER2 in cancer tissue of patients with invasive breast cancer in correlation with tumor type, histological grade, tumor size, lymph node status, and expression of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor.

Material and methods

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from 40 patients with invasive HER-2-positive breast cancer and from 191 patients with HER-2-negative breast cancer were used in this study. HER2 expression was determined using the test HerceptTest™ DAKO.

Results

Among 231 cases of breast cancer, 18 invasive lobular carcinomas and 213 invasive ductal carcinomas were diagnosed. Sixty percent of HER-2-positive breast cancers were ER-positive compared with 77% in the HER-2-negative group (p = 0.002). The expression of PR was observed in 43% of HER-2-positive breast cancers and in 72% of HER2-negative tumors (p = 0.003). Excessive expression of HER2 protein was detected in 60% of patients positive for estrogen receptors, which may worsen prognosis in these patients.

Conclusions

Determination of HER2 overexpression in breast cancer patients, allows for a determination of a group of patients with a worse prognosis.     

Frequency and reliability of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 in breast carcinoma determined by immunohistochemistry in Australasia: results of the RCPA Quality Assurance Program

Background and Aims

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has replaced radioligand binding assay for the determination of oestrogen receptor (ER) status in breast carcinoma. IHC is also used for assessment of progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2. The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA) Quality Assurance Program (QAP) introduced a breast markers module in 2003 to evaluate the performance of laboratories with IHC for ER, PR and HER2.

Methods

An audit of laboratories reporting breast carcinomas was performed in 2005 and 2006 to evaluate in‐house results. Laboratories were asked to submit the hormone receptor and HER2 status on each invasive breast carcinoma for the previous 6 month period up to a maximum of 100 cases. The time periods were 1 July 2004 to 31 December 2004, and 1 July 2005 to 31 December 2005. A total of 55 laboratories returned information for 2004 and 67 for 2005.

Results

Complete data on 8128 patients was returned for both surveys, 3353 cases for 2004 and 4775 for 2005. The results were similar for both surveys. Of the 8128 cases, 59.0% were ER+/PR+, 15.9% ER+/PR−, 2.4% ER−/PR+ and 22.7% ER−/PR−. HER2 data were submitted for a total of 6512 patients (excludes 52 patients with incomplete data sets); 17.1% were reported as 3+ positive on IHC, 12.5% as 2+ and 70.4% as negative.

Conclusions

A laboratory audit was introduced into the RCPA QAP for breast markers due to concerns raised by participating laboratories about technical differences in supplied tissues for testing. This audit indicates that overall the results for ER, PR and HER2 fall inside established parameters. However, a number of individual laboratories do not meet the target values and variation in results would impact on patient treatment decisions.In Australia there are approximately 12 000 new cases of breast carcinoma diagnosed each year. The dependence of some breast carcinomas on hormone receptors was identified more than 100 years ago with tumour regression in two of six patients after oophorectomy.¹ Assessment of hormone receptor status is utilised as a predictive marker to determine patient treatment and is performed on all breast carcinomas. Current assessment of hormone receptor status is based on immunohistochemistry (IHC). This has supplanted the radioligand binding assay that previously used frozen tissue.The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA) Quality Assurance Program (QAP) introduced a breast markers module in 2003 because of the critical importance of hormone receptor determination. It is a requirement of Australian laboratories that they participate in a quality assurance programme if this is available. While the majority of participating laboratories are from Australia, there are a number of laboratories from New Zealand and international locations. This module comprises two exercises each year consisting of a number of patient samples in a ring trial format. The original material was a composite block, but this has been changed to a tissue microarray construct for the past two years. The specimens consist of routine formalin fixed paraffin embedded material that has been supplied to the QAP by participants. Participating laboratories are sent these slides and asked to perform IHC for oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 on the sections, and return the slides for assessment as per their usual staining protocol. Homogeneity slides are stained by H&E; IHC and stability testing has been performed on the test slides. The participant''s slides are reviewed by a panel of scientists and pathologists and are scored individually from 0 to 5. Average scores are returned to participants. A score of 2 indicates that the result would affect patient treatment or management. Scores of 3 and above are considered satisfactory. This evaluation of the laboratories'' performance is included in the report as satisfactory, borderline or unsatisfactory.At any one episode approximately 30% of participating laboratories will have an unsatisfactory result in at least one of the three IHC markers. Using this system, a number of participating laboratories that achieved unsatisfactory results raised concerns about the supplied material. This included differences in fixation protocols, processing times and transit time to the laboratories. The laboratories indicated that the results on in‐house material were acceptable and therefore the ring studies were not a true reflection of the laboratory''s performance.To address these issues, laboratories were asked to perform an audit in 2005 and 2006 for the previous 6 month period. The aim was to truly indicate the reported results from each laboratory; this would overcome issues associated with external material and indicate if the in‐house results were achieving acceptable results.     

Discordance in receptor status between primary and metastatic breast cancer and overall survival: A single-center analysis

BackgroundThe tumor phenotype may change between primary and metastatic breast cancer. We compared the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 in a series of primary breast carcinomas (PBC) with their metastatic relapses and analyzed the impact of any changes on survival.Materials and methodsIt was a single-center retrospective study, collecting consecutive cases of metastatic breast carcinoma diagnosed in the pathology and medical oncology departments at Habib Bourguiba University Hospital in Sfax, Tunisia. An immunohistochemical study was used to assess ER, PR, and HER2 expression. Overall survival (OS) and post-metastasis survival (PMS) were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression analysis.ResultsOur study included 68 patients. ER and PR status changed in 29.4 % and 39.7 % of cases, respectively. Conversions were mainly from positive to negative status (22 % and 23.5 % for ER and PR, respectively). Differences in HER2 status were observed in 19.6 % of cases, with loss of overexpression in 6 patients (10.7 %). Adjuvant trastuzumab therapy and PBC molecular subtype (HR-, HER2+) were associated with HER2 status discordance (p = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). On multivariable analysis, HR-negative conversion tumors were significantly associated with a worse OS (p = 0.042) and PMS (p < 0.001), compared to HR-concordant positive tumors.ConclusionThis study establishes that HR and HER2 status discordance between primary and metastatic breast carcinoma has a prognostic impact on patient outcome. Analyzing these receptors' status in all newly diagnosed cases of metastatic breast carcinoma is strongly recommended and would provide information for changing treatment strategies.     

Secretory carcinoma of the breast: a distinct variant of invasive ductal carcinoma assessed by comparative genomic hybridization and immunohistochemistry

Secretory carcinomas (SCA) are distinguished from infiltrating ductal carcinomas (IDC) of the breast by their characteristic histomorphology and more favorable prognosis and by the expression of a chimeric tyrosine kinase that is encoded by the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene. On this basis, we evaluated 13 SCAs (12 of them with ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion) by molecular and immunohistochemical (IHC) methods. DNA was obtained from 8 of 13 microdissected SCAs and was analyzed for genetic alterations (GA) by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). IHC staining was performed for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2/neu, and Ki-67 (MIB1) in all 13 cases. Molecular and immunohistochemical results in SCAs were compared with previous data regarding immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics of IDCs. An average of 2.0 GAs (range: 0 to 6) were detected, including recurrent gains of chromosome 8q (37.5%) and 1q (25%) and losses of 22q (25%). Four of 13 (31%) SCAs were positive for ER, and 2 were positive for PR. The mean MIB1-labeling index was 11.4% (range: <1 to 34%). Her-2/neu protein overexpression was detected in 2 cases, including 1 with strong (score 3+) and 1 with weak HER2/neu expression (score 2+). Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of the latter case showed no evidence of HER-2/neu-gene amplification. Compared with previous findings in IDCs, SCAs are characterized by a relatively low number of GAs, a low proliferative rate, infrequent HER2/neu protein overexpression, decreased steroid hormone receptor expression, and expression of ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene. These results support the hypothesis that SCAs have immunohistochemical and genetic features that distinguish them from IDCs of the usual type.     

The effect of 96-hour formalin fixation on the immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 expression in invasive breast carcinoma

We studied the impact of 96 hours of formalin fixation on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 testing by comparing immunohistochemical results from core biopsy specimens fixed under current American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines with results for corresponding resection samples fixed for 96 hours. Samples enriched with cases showing weak to moderate receptor expression on core biopsy were included in the study. Cases were scored using ASCO/CAP guidelines. Of the 47 cases, only 1 case (2%) showed a qualitative change in result. However, this change was a positive ER result (H score, 1) on the 96-hour fixed resected sample compared with a negative ER result (H score, 0) for the core biopsy. Minimal changes in semiquantitative H scoring were noted for ER and PR that were likely due to tumor heterogeneity and/or intraobserver variability as the variation occurred in both directions. ER, PR, and HER2 immunohistochemical results should be considered valid for cases fixed up to 96 hours.     

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma: a distinctive clinical and molecular breast cancer type

Monhollen L, Morrison C, Ademuyiwa F O, Chandrasekhar R, Khoury T
(2012) Histopathology  61, 365–377 Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma: a distinctive clinical and molecular breast cancer type Aims: Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma (PLC) is an aggressive variant of invasive lobular carcinoma. The aim of this study was to redefine PLC in terms of molecular classification. Methods and results: Cases of PLC were selected between 1995 and 2010. Key clinicopathological features were recorded for most of the patients. A panel of immunohistochemical stains including E‐cadherin, oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), cytokeratin (CK)5/6, CK14, CK17, anti‐cytokeratin (CAM) 5.2, CD117, vimentin, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), p53 and gross cystic disease fluid protein‐15 (GCDFP‐15) were performed. HER2 test by fluorescence in‐situ hybridization (FISH) was also performed. The log‐rank test was used for statistical analyses. Forty cases fulfilled the criteria for PLC (26 with available tissue). The median age was 61 years and median tumour size was 2.0 cm. There were five of 38 (13.2%) triple‐negative cases. The basal type was seen in one of 25 cases (4%), which had a triple‐negative phenotype. HER2 was amplified in 14 of 38 cases (35%). Older patients and negative hormonal receptor status correlated significantly with worse clinical outcome (P < 0.03). The 5‐year recurrence‐free and overall survival was 54.9% and 76.2%, respectively. Conclusions: Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma is a distinctive breast cancer subtype. It has hybrid clinicopathological characteristics of ductal and lobular carcinoma.     

Comparison of MammaPrint and TargetPrint results with clinical parameters in German patients with early stage breast cancer

The 70-gene expression profile MammaPrint is a powerful prognostic indicator for disease outcome in breast cancer patients with improved prediction of recurrence risk compared to currently used guidelines. The microarray-based test TargetPrint further provides reliable, quantitative assessment of mRNA expression levels of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). This study was performed as a validation of MammaPrint and TargetPrint in an unselected German breast cancer population and was designed to determine the degree of concordance with currently applied clinical parameters. One hundred and forty cases of breast cancer stage I and II were classified as being low or high risk for distant metastasis using MammaPrint. Results were compared to current clinical risk classifications and adjuvant treatment management. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)/chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) assessments of ER, PR and HER2 were further compared with gene expression read-outs using TargetPrint. Thirty-two percent of patients (19/59) with a poor prognosis-signature identified via MammaPrint did not receive adjuvant systemic treatment apart from endocrine therapy and were potentially undertreated; whereas 42% (35/77) of patients with a good prognosis-signature received chemotherapy and were potentially overtreated. Comparison of microarray receptor results with IHC and FISH/CISH were concordant in 97% for ER; 86% for PR; and 94% for HER2. In this German study population, MammaPrint would have resulted in altered treatment advice for adjuvant systemic therapy in 40% of patients. Furthermore, TargetPrint presented high concordance for ER, PR and Her2 with IHC and FISH/CISH analysis.