Lack of clopidogrel pretreatment effect on the relative efficacy of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared to heparin with routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade: a REPLACE-2 substudy

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess if clopidogrel pretreatment affects the relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). BACKGROUND: Although thienopyridine pretreatment may improve clinical outcomes with PCI, it is unknown if bivalirudin's efficacy compared with heparin is dependent upon such pretreatment. METHODS: The Randomized Evaluation in Percutaneous coronary intervention Linking Angiomax to reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE-2) trial was a double-blind, triple-dummy, randomized-controlled trial comparing heparin plus routine GP IIb/IIIa blockade (heparin group) with bivalirudin plus provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade (bivalirudin group) during PCI. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), urgent revascularization at 30 days, and major in-hospital bleeding. The secondary end point was a 30-day composite of death, MI, and urgent revascularization. Clopidogrel pretreatment was encouraged (300 mg loading, 75 mg/day). RESULTS: Of 6,010 patients enrolled, 5,893 received clopidogrel, with 85.8% in the bivalirudin and 84.6% in the heparin group receiving clopidogrel pretreatment. Bivalirudin (provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade 7.2%) was noninferior to the heparin group for both primary and secondary end points. Clopidogrel pretreatment did not affect the relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin with GP IIb/IIIa blockade, irrespective of pretreatment duration. Pretreatment was associated with significantly lower primary end point with bivalirudin (8.7% pretreatment vs. 12.9% no pretreatment, p = 0.007), and nonsignificantly with heparin (9.7% vs. 11.7%, respectively, p = 0.20). Multivariable models showed a trend toward lower primary and secondary end points with clopidogrel pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel pretreatment at the doses and time administered in this trial did not influence the relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa blockade for PCI. However, pretreatment was associated with a trend towards lower clinical events after PCI.     

Update on Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade in Endovascular Interventions

Platelet aggregation plays a central role in the ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and the acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Although aspirin and heparin have been effective at decreasing adverse events in these settings, the perceived need for more potent inhibition of platelet aggregation has led to targeting of the platelet surface membrane glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) receptor. Several agents have been developed; four: abciximab, tirofiban, eptifibatide, and lamifiban have been tested in clinical trials. Overall, the positive findings of these studies have supported the hypothesis that enhanced platelet blockade leads to improved clinical outcomes in the settings of PCI and ACS. In this article, an overview of the various GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors is presented. The clinical trials of these agents as adjunctive therapy for patients undergoing PCI and in treatment of acute myocardial infarction are reviewed. Practical considerations relating to clinical efficacy, drug safety, and economic issues are discussed.     

Eptifibatide-induced thrombocytopenia

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce major adverse coronary events in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Unlike the other GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors, eptifibatide is rarely associated with thrombocytopenia with only a few cases reported in the medical literature. Here we report a case of a 34-year-old man presenting with a non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who underwent primary PCI with stenting and developed stent thrombosis 5 days after the procedure. He underwent repeat PCI with readministration of eptifibatide and subsequently developed profound thrombocytopenia within 4 h. This report adds another case of eptifibatide associated thrombocytopenia to the literature and reinforces the importance of platelet count monitoring after therapy with this agent.     

A Review of Clinical Trials with Eptifibatide in Cardiology

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists inhibit the binding of ligands to activated platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptors and, therefore, prevent the formation of platelet thrombi. Additional antithrombin therapy should be given in connection with GP IIb/IIIa administration. Eptifibatide is a small heptapeptide, which is highly selective and rapidly dissociates from its receptor after cessation of therapy. In clinical trials (IMPACT‐II and ESPRIT) concomitant administration of eptifibatide to patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduced thrombotic complications. In the PURSUIT trial, in patients with non‐ST‐elevation acute coronary syndromes, eptifibatide, compared to placebo, significantly reduced the primary endpoint of death and nonfatal myocardial infarction at 30 days. In patients with STEMI eptifibatide has been studied as an adjunct to fibrinolysis and primary PCI; it improved epicardial flow and tissue reperfusion. Current studies are evaluating eptifibatide as upstream therapy in high‐risk patients with NSTE‐ACS, in the EARLY‐ACS and in comparison with abciximab in patients with primary PCI in the EVA‐AMI trial.     

Eptifibatide in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The ESPRIT Trial Results

The ESPRIT (Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy) trial was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess whether a novel, double-bolus dose of eptifibatide could improve the outcomes of patients undergoing coronary stenting. A total of 2064 patients undergoing stent implantation in a native coronary artery were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated to receive eptifibatide, given as two 180-g/kg boluses 10 minutes apart and a continuous infusion of 2.0 g/kg-minute for 18 to 24 hours, or placebo, in addition to aspirin, heparin, and a thienopyridine. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), urgent target vessel revascularization (TVR), and thrombotic "bailout" GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy within 48 hours after randomization. The key secondary end point was the composite of death, MI, or urgent TVR at 30 days.     

Eptifibatide provides additional platelet inhibition in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients already treated with aspirin and clopidogrel. Results of the platelet activity extinction in non-Q-wave myocardial infarction with aspirin, clopidogrel, and eptifibatide (PEACE) study

OBJECTIVES: The present study hypothesis was that eptifibatide offered further antiplatelet efficacy above clopidogrel in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients before an expeditive coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: Although thienopyridines and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists are often co-prescribed in the context of NSTEMI, the antiplatelet interaction of these agents is poorly described and the superiority of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists above thienopyridine treatment alone is not clear. METHOD: Thirty-two NSTEMI patients treated with aspirin and enoxaparin were studied using flow cytometry to define parameters of platelet activation with a panel of agonists before clopidogrel, after clopidogrel, and during an eptifibatide infusion following the clopidogrel load. RESULTS: After platelet activation with adenosine diphosphate, thrombin receptor-activating peptide, or U46-619, relative reductions in conformationally activated GP IIb/IIIa receptor expression (evaluated with PAC-1) of 48%, 43%, and 33%, respectively (all p < 0.0001), were seen with clopidogrel, but further 80%, 78%, and 72% (all p < 0.0001) reductions were seen with eptifibatide. With the same agonists, fibrinogen binding was significantly reduced after clopidogrel by 70%, 64%, and 81% (all p < 0.0001) and again further reduced with eptifibatide by 90%, 95%, and 69% (all p < 0.0001). The total number of GP IIb/IIIa receptors (measured as P2 expression) and P-selectin expression fell after clopidogrel, after ex vivo stimulation with the same agonists; however, both parameters increased slightly during the eptifibatide infusion. CONCLUSIONS: The activated GP IIb/IIIa expression and fibrinogen binding findings indicate that eptifibatide provides significant potent antiplatelet activity above aspirin and clopidogrel, suggesting additive immediate protection in the treatment of NSTEMI. The P2 and P-selectin findings suggest the possibility of a partial agonist and/or pro-inflammatory effect.     

Planned versus provisional use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in smokers undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Postmortem and angiographic studies have demonstrated that thrombosis is the primary cause of coronary artery occlusion in smokers. Further, smokers have high levels of fibrinogen, increased platelet aggregation, and more platelet-dependent thrombin generation than do nonsmokers, suggesting that glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor use during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be especially useful among smokers. We evaluated a subpopulation of active smokers in the REPLACE-2 trial to assess the effect of treating smokers with bivalirudin and provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned GP IIb/IIIa blockade. The REPLACE-2 trial enrolled 1,558 smokers and 4,305 nonsmokers. Smokers who were treated with bivalirudin had an absolute 3.2% increase in the composite end point of death and myocardial infarction at 48 hours compared with smokers who were treated with heparin and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (7.7% vs 4.5%, p=0.008, interaction p=0.016). This difference was ameliorated when GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used consistently in a previous trial that compared bivalirudin with heparin during PCI (4.6% vs 6.7%, p=0.322). In conclusion, these results suggest that smokers may derive particular benefit with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors for decreasing myocardial infarction and death after PCI. These findings require further validation from other large, randomized trials.     

A propensity analysis of the impact of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy on in-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention

It is unknown whether the benefits of parenteral platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) demonstrated in randomized clinical trials extend to patients treated outside the setting of clinical trials. A contemporary registry of 10,847 consecutive PCI procedures was analyzed to determine the effect of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment on in-hospital major adverse coronary events ([MACEs] composite of death, urgent coronary artery bypass surgery, periprocedural myocardial infarction, abrupt closure, and stent thrombosis). In this registry, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were administered to 20.1% of patients. These patients were younger, more often men, and less often hypertensive than untreated patients. GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor-treated patients were more likely to present with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina. Stents were placed in 79% of patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. MACEs occurred in 7.8% of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor-treated patients compared with 3.8% of untreated patients (p <0.001). After multivariable adjustment for the propensity of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment as well as other possible confounders and interactions known to influence MACEs, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment was associated with a 57% increase in the risk of a MACE (odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 2.03; p = 0.0004). In a data set consisting of patients with a high degree of acuity predominantly treated with stent placement, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment is associated with an increase in thrombotic complications of PCI.     

Is glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonism as effective in women as in men following percutaneous coronary intervention?. Lessons from the ESPRIT study

OBJECTIVE: The study was done to determine whether eptifibatide, a platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonist, prevents ischemic complications following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in women as well as in men. BACKGROUND: Eptifibatide reduces ischemic complications after nonurgent coronary stent interventions. METHODS: We compared outcomes in women (n = 562) and men (n = 1,502) enrolled in the Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet GP IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy (ESPRIT) trial of double-bolus eptifibatide during PCI. RESULTS: Women in the ESPRIT trial were older, and more frequently had hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or acute coronary syndromes, but were less likely to have prior PCI or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The primary end point, a composite at 48 h of death, myocardial infarction (MI), urgent target vessel revascularization (TVR), and unplanned GP IIb/IIIa use, occurred in 10.5% of women and 7.9% of men (p = 0.082). The composite of death, MI, or TVR after one year occurred in 24.5% of women compared with 18% of men (p = 0.0008). At 48 h, eptifibatide reduced the composite of death, MI, and TVR from 14.5% to 6.0% in women versus 9.0% to 6.8% in men. At one year, these differences persisted: 28.9% versus 20.0% for women and 19.5% versus 16.6% for men. No statistical interaction existed between treatment and gender at either 48 h (p = 0.063) or one year (p = 0.2). Bleeding occurred more commonly in women (5.5% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.002), and was more common in eptifibatide-treated women. After adjustment for age, weight, and hypertension, no interaction between treatment and gender was present. CONCLUSION: Eptifibatide is effective to prevent ischemic complications of PCI in women and may eliminate gender-related differences in PCI outcomes.     

Meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety of abciximab versus eptifibatide or tirofiban in percutaneous coronary intervention

Three platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists have been evaluated in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). One of these agents, abciximab, is structurally and pharmacologically quite different from the other 2, eptifibatide and tirofiban. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine whether different antagonist types achieved different clinical outcomes, possibly related to their structural differences. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated and a random effects model was used to combine the outcomes of 14,644 patients enrolled in 8 prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials assessing treatment with a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor to prevent ischemic complications of PCI. Neither abciximab (OR 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4 to 1.9) nor eptifibatide or tirofiban treatment (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.4 to 1.28) resulted in reductions in mortality. Only the abciximab-treated patients had reductions in myocardial infarction (4.3% vs 8.5%, OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.59). There was no effect of eptifibatide or tirofiban on myocardial infarction (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.04). Urgent revascularization was reduced in both abciximab-treated (2.7% vs 6.2%, OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.53) and eptifibatide- and tirofiban-treated (4.2% vs 5.5%, OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.96) groups. Only abciximab-treated patients had increased major bleeding (5.8% vs 3.8%; OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.24 to 1.90). There was no effect of eptifibatide or tirofiban on major bleeding (5.0% vs 4.3%; OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.52). Thus, significant differences exist between clinical outcomes achieved by abciximab and those achieved by eptifibatide or tirofiban following PCl procedures.     

Antiplatelet Strategies: Evaluating Their Current Role in the Setting of Acute Coronary Syndromes

Numerous clinical trials have established the value of antiplatelet therapies for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Aspirin (ASA), thienopyridines (i.e., clopidogrel and ticlopidine) and GP IIb/IIIa antagonists comprise the major classes of antiplatelet therapies demonstrated to be of benefit in the treatment of ACS and for the prevention of thrombotic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clopidogrel is beneficial when administered before and after PCI, and is more effective when combined with either ASA or GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in preventing post‐PCI complications, coronary subacute stent thrombosis, and thrombotic events in general. It is currently unclear whether a higher loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg) is better than the standard loading dose (300 mg), how long therapy should continue, and which maintenance dose is optimal. The role of the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in ACS is less clear due to conflicting data from several studies with different patient populations. Currently, it appears that the use of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists might be most beneficial in high‐risk ACS patients scheduled to undergo PCI, who demonstrate non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction and elevated troponin levels. Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Long-term results following switch from abciximab to eptifibatide during percutaneous coronary intervention

Background:

The usage of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors improves the outcome during high‐risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the long‐term effects after a planned switch from abciximab to eptifibatide during PCI.

Hypothesis:

A switch from the general use of abciximab to eptifibatide as a GP IIb/IIIa in connection with PCI would not have any negative effects on long‐term clinical outcomes.

Methods:

To reduce costs, a general switch from abciximab to eptifibatide was instituted in 2004 in 2 university hospitals in Sweden. All patients treated 6 months before and 6 months after the switch were followed for 30 months. During the study period, 1038 patients underwent PCI and received a GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, 481 (46%) before the switch (Group A) and 557 (54%) after the switch (Group B). The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new coronary revascularization (percutaneous or surgical); secondary endpoints were the individual components of this composite. A separate analysis was performed on patients treated for ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction, non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction/unstable angina, and diabetes, respectively. Data were collected from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry.

Results:

There were no differences between the groups in the primary endpoint (29.7% in Group A vs 29.3% in Group B; P = 0.48) or in any of the secondary endpoints.

Conclusions:

A switch from the general usage of abciximab to eptifibatide as a GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor in connection with PCI did not seem to have any negative effects on long‐term clinical outcomes. Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.     

Meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and bleeding risk with intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists for percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the most common mode of coronary revascularization. Inhibition of platelet aggregation via glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor blockade significantly reduces the acute ischemic complications associated with PCI, but the risk of bleeding may also be increased with these agents. The purpose of the present study was to provide an up-to-date meta-analysis on the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in patients undergoing PCI. METHODS: A comprehensive search was undertaken to identify all randomized trials of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists versus control in patients intended to undergo PCI. Medline, Embase, Biosis, HealthStar and hand searches were performed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, thrombocytopenia and bleeding. OR and their 95% CI were calculated using the random effects model. RESULTS: Twenty-one randomized trials were identified, which together included 23,941 patients. The mortality rate at seven days was 0.33% in the GP IIb/IIa group compared with 0.50% in the control group (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.68); at 30 days, the mortality rate was 0.83% versus 1.21%, respectively (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.94); at six months, the mortality rate was 1.92% versus 2.33%, respectively (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.07); and at one year, the mortality rate was 2.61% versus 3.32%, respectively (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.00). The number needed to treat at 30 days to save one life was 296. The mortality benefit appeared to dissipate by six months and was of borderline significance at one year. The incidence of MI in the treatment group compared with the control group was reduced at seven days (4.31% versus 6.97%, respectively; OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.75), at 30 days (4.54% versus 6.46% respectively; OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.74) and at six months (5.73% versus 8.29%; OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.77). Repeat revascularization procedures were also significantly lower in the GP IIb/IIIa group compared with the control group at seven days (2.47% versus 4.44%, respectively; OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.84), at 30 days (3.44% versus 5.19%, respectively; OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.77) and at six months (15.21% versus 17.40%, respectively; OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.94). Overall, the composite of death, MI and repeat revascularization was reduced at all time points. An assessment of risk revealed that the incidence of thrombocytopenia (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.81) and minor bleeding (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.21), but not major bleeding (OR 1.29, 95 CI 0.98 to 1.68), was significantly increased in the GP IIb/IIIa group versus the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the setting of PCI significantly reduces the rates of 30-day mortality, MI and repeat revascularization procedures. These beneficial effects are achieved at an increased risk of thrombocytopenia and minor bleeding, but not major bleeding.     

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use during percutaneous coronary intervention: IIb or Not IIb,what is the question?

Over the past decade, numerous placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials have documented robust clinical benefits of intravenous platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This evidence has led to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and indication for use of two GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors at the time of PCI, namely, the chimeric monoclonal antibody fragment abciximab (ReoPro, Centocor, Inc. and Eli Lilly & Company) and the cyclic heptapeptide small molecule eptifibatide (Integrilin, COR Therapeutics and Key Pharmaceuticals). Currently, another small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, tirofiban (Aggrastat, Merck & Company), which (similar to eptifibatide) is approved for the medical therapy of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS), has not received indication for use in the PCI setting. Although the clinical benefits of both abciximab and eptifibatide administered at the time of PCI have been proven in randomized clinical trials, only abciximab has demonstrated a late survival advantage in patients following PCI. Evidence in support of the presence, magnitude and possible mechanisms for abciximab survival advantage is herein reviewed.     

Use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention and clinical outcomes

Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors are widely used in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Previous studies have suggested that they do not offer benefit in saphenous vein graft PCI. Nonetheless, their use remains widespread during vein graft angioplasty. We retrospectively analyzed 1,537 patients who underwent saphenous vein graft PCI. Patients who received a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (n = 941) were compared with those who did not receive any GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (n = 596). The primary end point was myonecrosis after PCI (creatine kinase-MB level >3 times the upper reference limit). The incidence of myonecrosis after PCI was similar between the group that received GP IIb/IIIa and the group that did not (odds ratio for GP IIb/IIIa use 1.39, 95% confidence interval 0.97 to 2.00, p = 0.07). Propensity-adjusted analysis demonstrated no significant difference in myonecrosis after PCI, in-hospital mortality, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or bleeding (blood transfusion, retroperitoneal bleed, or hematoma) between the 2 groups. In an analysis restricted to patients who were treated with an emboli protection device, GP IIb/IIIa use was not associated with decreased myonecrosis after PCI (this was also the case for patients who were not treated with an emboli protection device). Unadjusted survival (mean follow-up 5.5 +/- 0.1 years) was similar between the group that received GP IIb/IIIa and the group that did not (log-rank test, p = 0.89). There was no difference in survival after adjusting for the propensity to receive a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (adjusted odds ratio for GP IIb/IIIa use 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.23, p = 0.59). In conclusion, adjunctive use of platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in saphenous vein graft PCI does not appear to be associated with less myonecrosis or improved survival.     

Differential Effects of Citrate Versus PPACK Anticoagulation on Measured Platelet Inhibition by Abciximab, Eptifibatide and Tirofiban

Background: High levels of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition are required to prevent arterial thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention. Ex-vivo turbidometric platelet aggregation in citrate anticoagulated blood samples has been the primary method previously utilized to derive dose regimens for administering platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Enhanced GP IIb/IIIa binding and inhibition of platelet aggregation for eptifibatide secondary to citrate induced reduction of ionized plasma calcium concentrations has been reported. Methods/Results: We evaluated the differential effects of citrate versus PPACK anticoagulation on turbidometric platelet inhibition in normal volunteers by eptifibatide, tirofiban or abciximab. The decrease in ionized calcium afforded by citrate was associated with enhanced in vitro platelet inhibition for all three GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, including abciximab. The magnitude of citrate effect was greatest for eptifibatide. Both tirofiban and abciximab have similar citrate calcium chelation associated enhancement of measured platelet inhibition.Conclusion: Accurate assessment and comparison of platelet inhibition by GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors may require avoidance of calcium chelating anticoagulants.     

Efficacy and safety of triple antiplatelet therapy with and without concomitant anticoagulation during elective percutaneous coronary intervention (the REMOVE trial)

Adjunctive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition decreases ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but is associated with increased bleeding. We hypothesized that maximal antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, a thienopyridine, and a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor without unfractionated heparin (UFH) would result in fewer bleeding complications and maintain efficacy in elective PCI. A total of 159 patients undergoing elective PCI were randomized to intraprocedural eptifibatide alone or eptifibatide plus UFH. Patients received aspirin 325 mg and clopidogrel 300 mg before the procedure. The primary end point was the Landefeld bleeding index. Secondary end points included the composite clinical outcome of in-hospital death, myocardial infarction, urgent target vessel revascularization, and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding, and a composite bleeding outcome of major, minor, and nuisance bleeding. The Landefeld bleeding index was significantly lower in the eptifibatide-only group compared with the eptifibatide-plus-UFH group (3.0 vs 3.9, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the composite clinical end point between groups (eptifibatide only 17% vs eptifibatide plus UFH 15%, p = 0.7). There was a trend toward a decrease in the composite bleeding end point in the eptifibatide-only compared with the eptifibatide-plus-UFH group (43% vs 56%, p = 0.10). In conclusion, during elective PCI, a strategy of aggressive antiplatelet therapy using aspirin, clopidogrel, and eptifibatide without anticoagulant therapy appears to decrease bleeding complications.     

Time course, magnitude, and consistency of platelet inhibition by abciximab, tirofiban, or eptifibatide in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces platelet-mediated adverse ischemic outcomes. Although abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for use, these agents differ in their pharmacodynamic profiles. Each of these agents has been compared in randomized trials with placebo for patients undergoing PCI, but no randomized comparative studies of these agents have been performed. We compared ex vivo platelet function by both standard light transmission aggregometry and rapid platelet function assay during and after administration of abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban in approved dose regimens on a randomized basis at the time of PCI in patients with unstable angina pectoris. A reduced intensity of platelet inhibition by light transmission aggregometry was observed for tirofiban compared with either eptifibatide or abciximab. In addition, the 30-minute bolus strategy used for tirofiban was associated with delayed onset of maximal platelet inhibition relative to the initiation of bolus infusion. Whether the trends in platelet function observed in this study will be translated into differences in clinical outcomes awaits definition by larger scale randomized clinical trials comparing these platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.     

The combination of enoxaparin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and an early invasive approach among acute coronary syndrome patients

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the feasibility and safety of enoxaparin in combination with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as part of an early invasive strategy in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND: Trials in patients with ACS have evaluated the utility of enoxaparin, adjuvant GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors with PCI, and an early invasive approach. Information about the combination of all three of these approaches, however, is limited. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with ACS underwent cardiac catheterization, of whom 23 underwent PCI with enoxaparin and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of the study, a composite of death, myocardial infarction or urgent revascularization at 30 days, occurred in 8% of patients undergoing PCI. There were no deaths. One patient received a blood transfusion. No other adverse events occurred. These event rates were comparable to those from the pooled EPILOG/EPISTENT database, in which intravenous unfractionated heparin was used in conjunction with GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. The mean anti-Xa level in patients undergoing PCI was 0.74 0.48 U/ml. The majority of patients who underwent PCI within eight hours of their last dose of enoxaparin had therapeutic anti-Xa levels. CONCLUSION: In patients with ACS, enoxaparin in combination with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and an early invasive approach resulted in comparable clinical complication and bleeding rates versus historical references utilizing unfractionated heparin.     

Achieved platelet aggregation inhibition after different antiplatelet regimens during percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the extent of platelet aggregation inhibition in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), treated with different antiplatelet agents and dosages. BACKGROUND: The extent of platelet aggregation inhibition is an independent predictor of major cardiac events after elective PCI. In STEMI patients undergoing PCI, routine dose of antiplatelet agents may be associated with less effective platelet aggregation inhibition. METHODS: Patients were treated with clopidogrel before angiography and randomized to abciximab, tirofiban, high-dose tirofiban, or no glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor; GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor bolus, followed by maintenance infusion, was administered after angiography, but before PCI. Platelet aggregation inhibition was assessed before angiography, immediately after PCI, and 1 and 6 h afterwards. RESULTS: The total study population consisted of 112 patients. Platelet aggregation inhibition was variable for individuals and suboptimal for all agents, particularly in the periprocedural period. Only with high-dose tirofiban, mean periprocedural platelet aggregation inhibition exceeded 80%. Angiographic parameters after PCI were not different between the groups. No relationship was found between the level of platelet aggregation and parameters of PCI success (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count and myocardial blush grade), after combining the data from all four groups studied. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet aggregation inhibition in STEMI patients undergoing PCI, treated with antiplatelet agents, is variable and suboptimal for all agents and dosages studied. Only with high-dose tirofiban, mean periprocedural platelet aggregation inhibition exceeded 80%. However, no relationship of platelet aggregation inhibition and angiographic outcome was found in this patient cohort.