Phase I study of biweekly gemcitabine followed by oxaliplatin and simplified 48-h infusion of fluorouracil/leucovorin for advanced pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of oxaliplatin of a triplet regimen consisting of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and infusional fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (GOFL) for advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven metastatic or unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were eligible to take part in the study. The treatment consisted of fixed-rate infusion (10 mg/m2/minute) of 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine followed by 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin and then 48-h infusion of 5-FU/LV day 1 and day 15 every 4 weeks. The oxaliplatin would be evaluated at three dose levels, 65, 75 and 85 mg/m2. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients were enrolled at three dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicity of neutropenic fever and grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in one of each six patients at oxaliplatin dose level of 65 mg/m2 and 85 mg/m2, respectively. The MTD of oxaliplatin for this combination was 85 mg/m2. After a median four cycles of treatment, grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 46.7% of patients and thrombocytopenia in 13.3%. Non-hematological toxicities were generally of grade 1/2. Objective tumor response was observed in five patients (33.3%, 95% confidence interval, 6.3-60.4%). CONCLUSION: Biweekly GOFL is a feasible regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer. For further phase II studies, the recommended dose of oxaliplatin is 85 mg/m2.     

A phase I study of combination of intravenous gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and 5-FU with daily oral thalidomide (GOFT) in metastatic/locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerance dose and dose-limiting toxicity of gemcitabine/oxaliplatin/5-FU/thalidomide (GOFT) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODOLOGY: Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically proven locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Gemcitabine was given in a 1-hour infusion followed by oxaliplatin in a 2-hour infusion on day 1, and 5-FU in a 24-hour infusion on day 2, and oral thalidomide 100mg was given daily after intravenous chemotherapy. This regimen was given every 2 weeks. Dose levels of regimen were: level I: gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 + oxaliplatin 60mg/ m2 + 5-FU 1000mg/m2 + thalidomide 100mg/day, level II: gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 + oxaliplatin 70mg/m2 + 5-FU 1000mg/m2 + thalidomide 100mg/day, level III: gemcitabine 1250mg/m2 + oxaliplatin 60mg/m2 + 5-FU 1000mg/m2 + thalidomide 100mg/day. The NCI-CTC grade 3/4 toxicity was used for dose-limiting toxicity. Maximum tolerance dose was determined after the first two cycles in each patient. RESULTS: There were 6 patients in level I, 6 patients in level II, and 1 patient in level III. One of the 6 patients had DLT in level I (grade 3 infection and vomiting), 2 of 6 patients had DLT in level II (grade 3 leukopenia) and 1 patient in level III had DLT (grade 3 leukopenia and stomatitis). Other toxicities at level I/II were grade 1/2 leukopenia (7 episodes), grade 1/2 anemia (5), grade 1/2 nausea (5), grade 1 diarrhea (2), grade 1 alopecia (2), grade 1 skin (2), grade 1 allergy (1). CONCLUSIONS: The GOFT regimen was well tolerated and showed good treatment effect on the pancreatic cancer. We recommended the dose of level II GOFT regimen for further phase II trial.     

A phase II study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin for advanced pancreatic cancer]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gemcitabine has been the standard regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer, but the effect on the response rate and survival is still disappointing, leading to many trials of combination chemotherapy. 5-FU and cisplatin were combined with gemcitabine in this trial, as they are synergistic with gemcitabine and each other as well. This study was aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, 5-FU, and cisplatin for advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were entered into this study. Gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8, 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/day from day 1 to 3 for 72 hours, and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 2, 24 hours after the start of gemcitabine were administered every 3 weeks. RESULTS: From December 2001 to January 2004, twenty patients were enrolled in this study. Among 17 of these patients assessable, 3 patients had a partial remission with the response rate of 23.6% (95% confidence interval, 6.2-41.0%). The median time to disease progression was 230 days and median duration of survival was 322 days. Among total of 91 cycles, leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 12 cycles (13.2%), 12 cycles (13.2%), and 23 cycles (24.4%), respectively. Grade 3 or 4 mucositis developed at 2 cycles (2.2%), and nausea and vomiting were encountered in 3 cycles (3.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, 5-FU, and cisplatin for advanced pancreatic cancer is active and well-tolerated, warranting a phase III study.     

Phase II study of leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (FOLFUGEM 2)

AIM: FOLFUGEM 1 (leucovorin 400 mg/m2 combined with 5-flurorouracil (FU) bolus 400 mg/m2 then 5-FU 2-3 g/m2/46 hours and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 in 30 min) in patients with locally-advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma appeared to be toxic (neutropenia and alopecia). The aims of this phase II multicentric study were to evaluate the response rate, clinical benefit and tolerance of a new scheme of combined leucovorin, 5-FU and gemcitabine (FOLFUGEM 2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: FOLFUGEM 2 associated leucovorin 400 mg/m2 in 2 hours followed by 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 in 22 hours, then gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 (10 mg/m2/min) with cycles every 14 days. Gemcitabine dose could be increased (1000 then 1250 mg/m2) when NCI/CTC toxicity was < or = grade 2. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included (locally-advanced tumor: N = 13 and metastatic: N = 45). Among the 39 patients with measurable disease, 11 had partial response (28.2%, 95% confidence interval: 14-42%) and 11 had stable disease (28.2%). On an intent-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 19% (95% confidence interval: 9-29%). Clinical benefit rate was 46%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 3.1 and 7.2 months, respectively. There were 13% grade 3-4 neutropenia and 36% complete alopecia. CONCLUSION: FOLFUGEM 2 schema has an antitumoral effect in advanced pancreatic cancer and has an acceptable toxicity which appears to be less than that of FOLFUGEM 1.     

5-FU,folinic acid and cisplatin (LV5FU2-P) for unresectable pancreatic cancer

AIM: To prospectively evaluate efficacy and tolerance of the 5-fluorouracil + folinic acid + cisplatin (LV5FU2-P) combination in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 1998 and June 2000, 35 patients, mean age 61 years (37-75), with advanced (n=2) or metastatic (n=33) pancreatic cancer and initial performance status (WHO) of 0 (n=9), 1 (n=14) or 2 (n=12) were enrolled in the study. Two consecutive groups of patients were treated twice monthly, the first group (n=19) received the LV5FU2 regimen: a 2 hour-infusion of leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2), followed by 22-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) on 2 consecutive days and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2. The second group (n=16) received a simplified schedule with bolus leucovorin 40 mg/m(2), 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2) 48-hour infusion and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2. Clinical symptoms and performance status were monitored together with weight changes. Tumor assessment was performed every 2 months. RESULTS: Three patients (9%) exhibited grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 toxicity occurred in 31% of the patients (neutropenia: n=3, thrombocytopenia: n=1, vomiting: n=3, mucositis: n=3, diarrhea: n=1). There were no treatment-related deaths. Objective response was observed in 10 patients (29%, 95% confidence interval: 20-40%) including one complete response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.5 and 9 months, respectively. Six-months and 1-year survival rates were 70% and 25%, respectively. Weight gain was observed in 40% of the patients and performance status improved in 50%. CONCLUSION: LV5FU2-P regimen is active and well tolerated. It should be compared to gemcitabine as a first line therapy in advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

Phase II clinical trial of 5-fluorouracil, trimetrexate, and leucovorin (NFL) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

Background. Advanced pancreatic cancer has limited treatment options. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is frequently used in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Preclinical studies suggest synergism between trimetrexate (TMTX), 5-FU, and leucovorin (NFL). Aim. We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the activity and safety of NFL in pancreatic cancer. Method. Eligible patients (n=21) with untreated advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with 110 mg/m² intravenous (IV) THTX on day 1 and 200 mg/m² IV leucovorin prior to 500 mg/m² IV 5-FU on day 2. Oral leucovorin (15 mg every 6 h for seven doses) started intravenous 24 h later. Results. Treatment was administered for 6 wk followed by a 2-wk rest period. Response was evaluated every 8 wk. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Most patients (80%) had distant metastases. Forty-five cycles of chemotherapy were administered. The most common serious toxicities were Grade 3 diarrhea (23.8%) and nausea and vomiting (14.2%). The response rate was 4.1% (95% CI, 0–23%), median survival was 6.8 mo, and 1-yr survival was 19%. Conclusion. Treatment with NFL is well-tolerated in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The median survival and 1-yr survival in these patients with poor prognosis compares favorably with other treatment options.     

Phase I study of the combination of nedaplatin, adriamycin and 5-fluorouracil for treatment of advanced esophageal cancer

This trial was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, principal toxicity, and recommended dose (RD) for the phase II study of the combination of nedaplatin (NED), adriamycin (ADM), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Patients with previously untreated esophageal cancer were eligible if they had performance status 0-1, were 75 years or younger and had adequate organ function. The dose of NED, the key anticancer platinum complex drug, was increased from 60 to 70, and 80 mg/m(2) on day 1. ADM and 5-FU were administered at fixed doses (30 mg/m(2) on day 1, and 700 mg/m(2) on days 1-5). The dose-limiting toxicities of NED were neutropenia and severe diarrhea, and its maximum-tolerated dose and RD were 70 mg/m(2) and 60 mg/m(2), respectively. There were four responders among the six patients administered the RD. The present study thus revealed combination chemotherapy with NED, ADM, and 5-FU to be active and well-tolerated and to warrant phase II study.     

Phase?I?trial of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine,cisplatin, and S-1 in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer

AIM: To evaluate the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin and S-1 which is an oral fluoropyrimidine pro-drug in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.METHODS: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer were enrolled. The planned dose levels of gemcitabine (mg/m²), cisplatin (mg/m²), and S-1 (mg/m² per day) were as follows: level -1, 800/20/60; level 0, 800/25/60; level 1, 1000/25/60; and level 2, 1000/25/80. In each cycle, gemcitabine and cisplatin were administered intravenously on days 1 and 15, and S-1 was administered orally twice daily on days 1 to 7 and days 15 to 21, every 4 wk.RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled, and level 0 was chosen as the starting dose. None of the first three patients had DLTs at level 0, and the dose was escalated to level 1. One of six patients had DLTs (grade 4 febrile neutropenia, leucopenia, and neutropenia; grade 3 thrombocytopenia) at level 1. We then proceeded to level 2. None of three patients had DLTs during the first cycle. Although the MTD was not determined, level 2 was designated at the RD for a subsequent phase II study.CONCLUSION: The RD was defined as gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² (days 1, 15), cisplatin 25 mg/m² (days 1, 15), and S-1 80 mg/m² per day (days 1-7, 15-21), every 4 weeks. A phase II study is planned to evaluate the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 in advanced biliary tract cancer.     

局部晚期胰腺癌放疗并同期5-FU对比吉西他滨的疗效分析

目的 比较放疗联合5-氟尿嘧啶（5-FU）与放疗联合吉西他滨治疗局部晚期胰腺癌的疗效及放、化疗不良反应.方法 回顾性分析第四军医大学西京医院放疗科2007年1月到2011年1月收治的56例局部晚期不可手术切除的胰腺癌患者的资料.入组患者均采用三维适形或三维适形调强放疗并同期给予单药5-FU或吉西他滨化疗.放疗剂量每次1.8 ～2 Gy,每周5次,总剂量45 ～ 50.4 Gy,共25～ 28次.同期吉西他滨化疗组共30例,在放疗期间的第1、8、15、22天以500 mg/m2体表面积的剂量、10 mg· （m2）-1·min-1微量泵泵入给药;放疗结束后休息3周,再以800 mg· （m2）-1·d-1的剂量静脉滴注,每周1次,连用3～4周.同期5-FU化疗组共26例,放疗期间以500 mg· （m2）-1·d-l剂量静脉滴注,每周第1～5天给药,14 d一个周期;放疗结束后休息3周,按照800 mg·（m2）-1·d-1的剂量静脉滴注,每周第1～5天给药,14 d一个周期,连用3～4个周期.观察疗效和不良反应,并对患者进行随访,随访截止日为2013年6月,计算患者中位生存时间和l、2年生存率.结果 全组客观有效率（CR＋ PR）为73.2％,放疗联合5-FU组总有效率为65.3％,放疗联合吉西他滨组总有效率80.0％（P＜0.05）.全组1、2年生存率分别为48.2％和14.3％,中位生存期为15.2个月,其中放疗联合5-FU组分别为42.3％、11.5％、13.3个月,放疗联合吉西他滨组分别为53.3％、16.7％、16.6个月,两组患者生存率差异无统计学意义（P=0.071）.治疗结束后全组疼痛客观缓解率（VAS评分＜4分）为83.3％,放疗联合5-FU组为75％,放疗联合吉西他滨组为90％.放疗联合吉西他滨治疗组发生3～4级骨髓抑制率显著高于放疗联合5-FU组,差异具有统计学意义（20.0％比7.6％,P＜0.05）.结论 手术不能切除的局部晚期胰腺癌患者采用放疗联合吉西他滨化疗在长期生存、疼痛缓解方面较放疗联合5-FU具有优势,但骨髓抑制的不良反应较强.     

Randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin in advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Phase II trials of combined 5 fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin have demonstrated an 18-28% response rate in advanced pancreatic carcinomas. We investigated the effect of this chemotherapy regime on patients' survival. METHODOLOGY: Patients included gave informed consent. They had an advanced and proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The trial was multicentric, prospective and randomized. It compared a 5-day course of leucovorin (200 mg/m2/day), 5-fluorouracil (375 mg/m2/day) and cisplatin (15 mg/m2/day) repeated every 21 days (23 patients) with a control group (22 patients). The main end points were survival time (Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods) a[not readable: see text]side effects of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Association of leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin failed to demonstrate any advantage of this regimen compared with supported care alone. Median survival times were 8.6 months (SD +/- 1.8) and 7.0 months (SD +/- 0.6), respectively. The modulation of 5-fluorouracil by leucovorin and cisplatin was well tolerated with moderate toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS: This multicentric trial failed to demonstrate any advantage of the evaluated chemotherapy regime in the palliative treatment of cancer of the exocrine pancreas. Other trials including gemcitabine and/or radiotherapy are needed in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.     

Results of a retrospective analysis of gemcitabine as a second-line treatment after chemoradiotherapy and maintenance chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Background  Many studies of concurrent chemoradiation therapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer have been reported with a median survival time of approximately 10 months. Recently, gemcitabine (GEM) has been administered immediately after chemoradiation. The clinical outcome of chemoradiation therapy in conjunction with 5-FU and second-line chemotherapy with GEM after disease progression has not been clarified. Methods  Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with concurrent radiation therapy (1.8 Gy/fraction; total dose, 50.4 Gy) with 5-FU (200 mg/m² every day) until disease progression, followed by GEM (1000 mg/m², days 1, 8, 15, and every 4 weeks) as second-line therapy. Results  Of the 18 patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer who received chemoradiation therapy with 5-FU, there were three partial responses, giving a response rate of 17%. The median time to progression was 170 days. The median survival time was 443 days. During chemoradiation therapy, the incidences of grade 3 or 4 anorexia, nausea, mucositis, and gastric ulcer were 33%, 22%, 17%, and 17%, respectively. Sixteen patients received second-line chemotherapy with GEM, of whom one patient had a partial response. The median time to progression from the initiation of GEM was 113 days, and median overall survival time was 231 days. Major toxicities were hematological toxicities: grade 3 or 4 leukopenia in 75% and anemia in 31%. Conclusions  The treatment strategy with concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance chemotherapy with 5-FU followed by second-line chemotherapy with GEM may be an option for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.     

A phase I dose-escalating study of docetaxel plus folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in anthracycline-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Since the need for nonanthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimens increases with the increased use of anthracyclines in earlier stages of breast cancer, we investigated the feasibility of the combination of docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with folinic acid (FA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Anthracycline-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer were eligible. Docetaxel was administered as a one-hour infusion every three weeks on day 1, FA 500 mg/m2 (fixed dose) as a two-hour infusion on days 1 and 15 and 5-FU as a 24-hour infusion on days 1 and 15. The dose levels tested were (docetaxel/5FU in mg/m2): 60/1800, 75/1800, 85/1800, 100/1800, and 100/2100. RESULTS: Altogether 28 patients were accrued and treated in this multicentre open-label study. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were not observed at dose level I, and in two patients in each of the higher dose levels. DLTs observed were grade III/IV infection (n=4), febrile neutropenia (n=2), diarrhoea (n=1) and erythema (n=1). Partial responses were observed in 10 out of 24 evaluable patients (42%, 95% confidence interval 22.1 to 63.4%). Dose escalation beyond the highest dose level (100/2100) was deemed inappropriate, because these dose levels correspond to recommended dose levels for each drug as a single agent. CONCLUSION: Combination of docetaxel (100 mg/m2, one-hour infusion q3 weeks on day 1), FA (500 mg/m2, two-hour infusion on days 1 and 15) and 5-FU (2100 mg/m2, 24-hour infusion on days 1 and 15) is a feasible regimen with encouraging activity in anthracycline-pretreated patients.     

Chemoradiotherapy in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: phase-I study with a fixed radiation dose and escalating doses of weekly gemcitabine.

AIM: The aim of this phase-I study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly gemcitabine in concurrent combination with a total radiation dose of 54 Gy in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: In all patients, a total dose of 54 Gy was delivered in 30 fractions of 1.8 Gy/day. Gross tumor volume and regional lymph nodes were included in the irradiated volume with a 1- to 1.5-cm margin. The doses of weekly gemcitabine were escalated from 100 mg/m2 by increments of 50 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as hematologic toxicity, prolonged grade-3 non-hematologic toxicity, and incompletion of the planned treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients entered the trial. From level 1 (100 mg/m2) to level 4 (250 mg/m2), no patient experienced DLT except for 1 patient at level 1. At level 5 (300 mg/m2), 3 of the 5 patients met the DLT criteria. One patient developed severe pulmonary abscess, and the other 2 patients had hematologic DLT. The overall partial response rate was 29%, and the median survival time was 13.7 months. The first relapse occurred at the in-field primary site in 6 patients and at distant organs in 13 patients. CONCLUSION: The MTD of weekly gemcitabine was 250 mg/m2 in the present chemoradiotherapy setting. The efficacy of this chemoradiotherapy regimen is currently being evaluated in the phase-II setting.     

Intra-arterial continuous infusion for treatment of pancreatic and biliary tract cancer.

BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapy does not satisfactorily improve the poor prognosis of pancreas and biliary tract cancer unresectable or metastatic to the liver. Intra-arterial infusion of antineoplastic agents can give higher concentrations to the tumor and slighter concentrations to the whole body, with a potential of efficacy and lower toxicity, due to the hepatic clearance. METHODS: Based on a safe and ambulatorial technique of transcutaneous arterial port implantation, this study was designed to evaluate feasibility and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) intra-arterial continuous infusion combined with systemic gemcitabine with dose escalation. Seventeen patients affected by pancreatic (14) or biliary tract (3) cancer received up to six cycles of treatment. Treatment consisted of intravenous gemcitabine on d 1 and 8 and intra-arterial 5-FU continuous infusion on d 1-14 every 21 d. Dose-escalation levels were 900 and 1000 mg/m2 for gemcitabine and 8, 10, 12, 15, and 17 mg/kg/d for 5-FU. Consecutive cohorts of three patients were planned at each dose level. RESULTS: Gastrointestinal toxicity (vomiting and diarrhea [3rd-4th degree] and gastritis), constituted the dose-limiting toxicity, with a maximum-tolerated dose of 1000 mg/m2 for gemcitabine and 15 mg/kg/d for 5-FU. Hematological toxicity was present in a minority of patients. No patient had acute or later complications such as arterial thrombosis related to the implanted arterial port, sclerosis cholangitis, or chemical cholecistitis. CONCLUSION: 5-Fluorouracil intra-arterial continuous infusion, combined with systemic gemcitabine, seems to be a feasible and safe regimen that could give interesting results in pancreatic cancer.     

A phase I trial of CPT-11 in combination with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To establish a safe and practical chemotherapeutic regimen using CPT-11 in combination with 5-FU plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in an outpatient setting, a phase I clinical trial was conducted. METHDOLOGY: Eligible patients received the RPMI regimen of I-LV (200 mg/m2, for 2 hours) plus 5-FU (333 mg/m2, bolus) weekly for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest. CPT-11 was administered over the 5-FU/LV therapy at the 1st and 3rd week of every treatment cycle before the bolus 5-FU. Dose escalation of CPT-11 from 25 to 100 mg/m2 was done for every cohort consisting of at least 3 patients to define a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximal tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended dose (RD) for a phase II trial. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled. Hematologic toxicity was very infrequently observed. One patient enrolled at level 1 (25 mg/m2 CPT-11), but not the other patients, had muscle weakness at grade 3 and needed to be hospitalized. Hair loss at grade 1 was observed in 3 of 21 patients. Gastrointestinal toxicity, including nausea, was commonly observed throughout the dose levels. Diarrhea was frequently observed at doses higher than level 4 (60 mg/m2 CPT-11), and 2 of the 3 patients at dose level 6 (100 mg/m2 CPT-11) experienced diarrhea at grade 3 and needed to be hospitalized. As for the overall tumor responses, 3 partial responses (PR), 10 stable diseases, and 6 progressive diseases were observed, with 2 of the PRs occurring at dose level 5 (80 mg/m2 CPT-11). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that our treatment regimen using CPT-11 in combination with 5-FU/LV is a safe regimen in an outpatient setting and effective for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The DLT is diarrhea at the MTD of 100 mg/m2 of CPT-11, and 80 mg/m2 CPT-11 is recommended for the next phase II trial.     

Phase I study of high-dose topotecan with haematopoietic stem cell support in the treatment of ovarian carcinomas: the ITOV 01 protocol

Topotecan has demonstrated activity in ovarian carcinomas. In order to increase the tumour response rate and to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan, we decided to develop a high-dose phase I regimen supported by stem cell support. High-doses schedules using a 1-day single administration have MTDs of 10.5 (24 h continuous infusion (CI)) or 22.5 mg/m2 (30 min infusion). Five-day CI induces grade IV mucositis at high doses (MTD<12 mg/m2). We chose to administer topotecan in a 5-day schedule with a 30 min daily infusion. Patients were scheduled to receive one cycle of therapy. The first dose level was 4.0 mg/m2/day x 5 days. Limiting toxicities were defined as toxic death, grade IV non-haematopoietic or haematopoietic toxicity >6 weeks. From August 1998 to April 2002, 49 patients were included. Forty-three patients have completed one course and 15 have received two cycles. One patient treated at level 7 mg/m2/day died of sepsis. Median duration of grade IV neutropenia was 9 days. Two episodes of grade IV diarrhoea were observed at level 9.5 mg/m2/day. Pharmacokinetic data were linear within the dose range of 4-9.0 mg/m2/day. The MTD was reached at 9 mg/m2/day x 5 days.     

Gemcitabine and protracted 5-FU for advanced pancreatic cancer. A phase II study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer procures dismal results, both 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine have shown a modest activity. We report a phase II study of gemcitabine combined with protracted 5-fluorouracil. METHODOLOGY: Gemcitabine was given at 1000 mg/m2/week intravenously, in combination with concomitant 5-fluorouracil 200 mg/m2/day as a protracted venous infusion, both 3 out of 4 weeks in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled, among whom 27 were metastatic. Response rate, overall and progression-free survival were endpoints, as well as tolerance and clinical benefit. RESULTS: We observed 3 (10%) partial responses, and 12 (42%) stabilizations within which the median disease control was 5.6 months. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 2.8 and 4 months, respectively. A clinical benefit was observed in 39% of patients. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity, but no grade 4 was observed. Other toxicities were mild. CONCLUSIONS: This combination chemotherapy was well tolerated in advanced pancreatic cancer patients.     

Phase II study of cisplatin combined with weekly gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Combination therapy of gemcitabine and cisplatin has been reported as an effective regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the toxicity and synergism are known to depend on the schedule of cisplatin. A phase II study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of a single dose of cisplatin in combination with weekly gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with measurable, metastatic pancreatic carcinoma, not locally advanced diseases, were included. The patients were treated with a combination of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) i.v. over 30 min administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) i.v. administered 6 h after gemcitabine infusion on day 1 with adequate prehydration. Response and toxicity were assessed according to World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients, 5 with recurrent disease after curative operation, were enrolled from January 2000 to March 2004. The objective response rate was 16 of 52 patients (1 complete response and 15 partial response). Disease stabilization was seen in 10 patients (20.8%). The median survival was 11.8 months (95% CI, 10.7-13.0 months), with 76.1% of patients alive at 6 months and 50% alive at 12 months. The median time to progression was 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.16-7.98 months). Major toxicity profiles were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: The modified regimen of a single dose of cisplatin per cycle in combination with weekly gemcitabine appeared to have a more favorable therapeutic index and comparable toxicity profiles.     

Folfirinox in elderly patients with pancreatic or colorectal cancer-tolerance and efficacy

AIM To study the tolerance and the efficiency of FOLFIRINOX in elderly patients diagnosed with colorectal or pancreatic cancer.METHODS This retrospective study included elderly patients aged over 70 years of age treated at Georges-Francois Leclerc Center by FOLFIRINOX for histological proved colorectal or pancreatic cancer between January 2009 and January 2015. Chemotheapy regimen consisted of oxaliplatin(85 mg/m2 in over 120 min) followed by leucovorin(400 mg/m2 in over 120 min), with the addition, after 30 min of irinotecan(180 mg/m2 in over 90 min) then 5 fluorouracil(5FU)(400 mg/m2 administred intravenous bolus), followed by 5FU(2400 mg/m2 intraveinous infusion over 46 h) repeated every 2 wk. Geriatric parameters were recorded at the beginning. Toxicities were evaluated with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.03. Tumor response was evaluated by CT scan. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicities or patient refusal.RESULTS Fifty-two patients aged from 70 to 87 years were treated by FOLFIRINOX, 34 had colorectal cancer and 18 had pancreatic cancer. Most of them were in good general condition, 82.7% had a 0-1 performance status and 61.5% had a Charlson Comorbidity Index 10. The most frequent severe toxicities were neutropenia(17 patients, n = 32.7%) and diarrhea(35 patients n = 67.3%); 10 of the case of neutropenia and 5 of diarrhea registered a grade 4 toxicity. Thirty-nine patients(75%) initially received an adapted dose of chemotherapy. The dosage was adjusted for 26% of patients during the course of treatment. Tumor response evaluated by RECIST criteria showed a controlled disease for 25 patients(48.1%), a stable disease for 13 and a partial response for 12 patients. Time under treatment was higher for colorectal cancer with a median time of 2.44 mo(95%CI: 1.61-3.25). Overall survival was 43.88 mo for colorectal cancer and 12.51 mo for pancreatic cancer. In univariate or multivariate analysis, none of geriatric parameters were linked to overall survival. Only the type of tumor(pancreatic/colorectal) was linked in both analysis.CONCLUSION For people over 70 years old, FOLFIRINOX regimen seems to induce manageable toxicities but similar, even higher, median survival rates compared to younger people.     

Phase I study of docetaxel, cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma

This phase I study is designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity of docetaxel with cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Docetaxel was given once a week with the dosage escalated from 5 mg/m(2) to 15 mg/m(2) in increments of 2.5 mg/m(2). Cisplatin were administered at 20 mg/m(2) once a week. Radiotherapy was delivered to 50.4Gy at 1.8Gy/day. At least three patients were enrolled at each level. The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLTs) was determined. The DLTs were defined as grade 3 or 4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity. Twenty-one patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Grade 1-2 neutropenia and nausea/vomiting were the most common side effects. The first DLT (grade-3 neutropenia) was observed in one of three patients at 12.5 mg/m(2) docetaxel. Three more patients were enrolled, but DLT was not observed and 6 patients were enrolled into 15 mg/m(2) group, DLT occurred in 3 patients (1 Grade 3 neutropenia, 1 Grade 4 neutropenia and 1 Grade 3 nausea/vomiting). Overall tumor response rate was 66.7% with 28.6% complete and 38.1% partial response. In conclusion, the MTD of docetaxel was 15 mg/m(2), and the recommended dose of docetaxel for Phase II study was 12.5 mg/m(2) weekly. The docetaxel and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy were tolerable and feasible in treating locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.