Axillary Recurrence After Sentinel Node Biopsy

Background Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has evolved as the standard of care in the surgical staging of breast cancer. This technique is accurate for surgical staging of axillary nodal disease. We hypothesized that axillary recurrence after SNB is rare and that SNB may provide regional control in patients with microscopic nodal involvement.Methods With institutional review board approval, SNB was performed with peritumoral injection of ^99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid. From 1996 to 2003, 1167 patients were entered into a prospective cancer database after surgical therapy; 916 patients consented to long-term follow-up. Fifty-two patients (5.7%) did not map successfully and were excluded, leading to a study population of 864 patients. The median follow-up was 27.4 months (range, 1–98 months).Results The median number of sentinel nodes harvested was 2, and 633 (73%) patients had negative sentinel nodes. Thirty (4.7%) of those sentinel node–negative patients underwent completion axillary dissection, whereas 592 (94%) patients were followed up with observation. A total of 231 (27%) had positive sentinel nodes: 158 (68%) of these patients underwent completion axillary dissection, and 73 (32%) were managed with observation alone. Two (.32%) patients who were sentinel node negative had an axillary recurrence; one of these patients had undergone completion axillary dissection. No patient in the observed sentinel node–positive group had an axillary recurrence (odds ratio, .37; P = .725).Conclusions On the basis of a median follow-up of 27.4 months, axillary recurrence after SNB is extraordinarily rare regardless of nodal involvement, thus indicating that this technique provides an accurate measure of axillary disease and may impart regional control for patients with node-positive disease.     

Second Biopsy of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node for Reappearing Breast Cancer After Previous Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Background Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a safe and accurate axillary staging procedure for patients with primary operable breast cancer. An increasing proportion of these patients undergo breast-conserving surgery, and 5% to 15% will develop local relapses that necessitate reoperation. Although a previous SLNB is often considered a contraindication for a subsequent SLNB, few data support this concern. Methods Between January 2000 and June 2004, 79 patients who were previously treated at our institution with breast-conserving surgery and who had a negative SLNB for early breast cancer developed, during follow-up, local recurrence that was amenable to reoperation. Eighteen of these patients were offered a second SLNB because of a clinically negative axillary status an average of 26.1 months after the primary event. Results In all 18 patients (7 with ductal carcinoma-in-situ and 11 with invasive recurrences), preoperative lymphoscintigraphy showed an axillary sentinel lymph node, with a preoperative identification rate of 100%, and 1 or more SLNs (an average of 1.3 per patient) were surgically removed. Sentinel lymph node metastases were detected in two patients with invasive recurrence, and a complete axillary dissection followed. At a median follow up of 12.7 months, no axillary recurrences have occurred in patients who did not undergo axillary dissection. Conclusions Second SLNB after previous SLNB is technically feasible and likely effective in selected breast cancer patients. A larger population and longer follow-up are necessary to confirm these preliminary data.     

Patterns of Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is gaining acceptance as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and pattern of disease recurrence after SLNB.Methods: Two-hundred twenty-two consecutive patients undergoing SLNB from April 6, 1998, to October 27, 1999, and who were 24 months out from their procedure were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Retrospective chart review and data analysis were performed to identify variables predictive of recurrence.Results: The median patient follow-up was 32 months (range, 24–43 months). A total of 159 patients (72%) were sentinel lymph node (SLN) negative and had no further axillary treatment. Five of these patients (3.1%) developed a recurrence (one local and four distant), with no isolated regional (axillary) recurrences. Sixty-three patients (28%) were SLN positive and underwent a subsequent axillary lymph node dissection. Six of these patients (9.5%) developed a recurrence (three local, one regional, and two distant). Pathologic tumor size (P < .001), lymphovascular invasion (P = .018), and a positive SLN (P = .048) were all statistically significantly associated with disease recurrence.Conclusions:With a minimum follow-up of 24 months, patients with a negative SLN and no subsequent axillary treatment demonstrate a low frequency of disease recurrence. This supports the use of SLNB as the sole axillary staging procedure in SLN-negative patients.     

Impact of Omission of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection After Negative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: 70-Month Follow-up

Background  

The objective of this study is to assess the oncologic safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), especially with regard to the axillary recurrence (AR) rate, and to determine the risk factors for AR and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after negative SLNB.     

Axillary Ultrasonography to Detect Recurrence After Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer

Background Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for breast cancer has a false-negative rate of approximately 5%. Initial reports of follow-up show lower axillary recurrence rates than expected. We performed axillary ultrasonography to determine whether occult recurrences could be detected. Methods In a community hospital setting, 289 patients who had SNB for breast cancer in a single surgeon’s practice underwent axillary examination by the surgeon followed by axillary ultrasonography by a dedicated breast radiologist. Ultrasonography was performed one time from 4 to 79 months (median, 25 months) after surgery. Five patients with suspicious nodes had ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration, and one had a core biopsy. Results No patient had suspicious nodes on clinical examination. Only six patients had ultrasound findings that warranted intervention. Five patients had benign cytological characteristics, and one had a benign core biopsy result. No evidence of axillary recurrence was found in any patient. Conclusions Axillary ultrasonography did not detect occult metastases in any patient and is not recommended for routine follow-up after SNB. The lack of ultrasound evidence of metastasis suggests that the recurrence rate is likely to remain low.     

Axillary Recurrence after Negative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Frequency and Factors Influencing Recurrence on the Long Term

Abstract:  Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a less invasive method for determining tumor stage. Purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of axillary recurrence after negative SLN biopsy for women with breast cancer. A total of 121 patients with a negative SLN biopsy, from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2004, were identified from a maintained pathology database. Retrospective chart review and data analysis were performed until September 1, 2006, to determine frequency of axillary recurrence and identify variables predictive of recurrence. Two hundred and sixty eight patients had undergone SLN biopsy in the researched period, of which 121 were SLN negative and had no further axillary treatment. The median follow-up was 44 months (range, 15–76 months). Three patients (2.5%) developed isolated axillary recurrence. Five patients (4.1%) developed distant disease recurrence. Grade 3 tumor differentiation was significantly associated with tumor recurrence. Tumor size, hormone receptor state, and mitotic activity/2 mm² were not significantly associated with disease recurrence. Patients with a negative SLN biopsy with no further axillary treatment, show a low rate of axillary recurrence. SLN biopsy is a less invasive and accurate method for determining tumor stage and a negative SLN biopsy provides good regional control of the axilla on the long term.     

Eighteen Sensations After Breast Cancer Surgery: A 5-Year Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Background The aim of this study is to evaluate prevalence, severity, and level of distress of 18 sensations at baseline (3–15 days) and 5 years after breast cancer surgery, and compare sensations after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with those after SLNB plus immediate or delayed axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Methods A total of 187 patients with breast cancer completed the Breast Sensation Assessment Scale at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after surgery to assess prevalence, severity, and level of distress of sensations. Of these, 133 had SLNB, and 54 had SLNB and ALND. Additionally, of the 187 patients, 141 had breast-conservation therapy and 46 had total mastectomy. Results Sensations were less prevalent, severe, and distressing after SLNB compared with ALND at baseline and at 5 years. This difference was most evident in those who had breast-conservation therapy. Most sensations after SLNB and ALND, even if prevalent, were not severe or distressing. Some sensations remained notably prevalent at 5 years, including tenderness and twinges after SLNB, and tightness and numbness after ALND. Phantom sensations were frequently reported by mastectomy patients. Conclusions Prevalence, severity, and level of distress of sensations were lower after SLNB compared with ALND, but some morbidity existed after SLNB. Certain sensations remained highly prevalent in both groups for up to 5 years.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Local Recurrence of Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Therapy

Background Lymphatic mapping (LM) with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has revolutionized the surgical staging of primary breast cancer, but its utility and feasibility have not been established in patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiation. Methods We reviewed our breast cancer database to identify all patients who underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for IBTR and whose primary tumor had been managed by BCS, SLN biopsy and/or axillary node dissection, and adjuvant breast irradiation. Results Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy identified migration to the regional nodal drainage basins in 11 (73%) of 15 patients, as follows: 5 ipsilateral axillary, 1 supraclavicular, 2 internal mammary, 2 interpectoral, and 3 contralateral axillary. Two patients demonstrated drainage to two nodal basins. In four patients, no drainage was observed. Intraoperative LM with radioisotope plus blue dye identified at least 1 SLN in 11 of 14 patients, and histopathologic evaluation revealed metastasis in 3 patients (2 contralateral axillary and 1 ipsilateral axillary). During preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, the radiocolloid migration time tended to be longer and the drainage pathways more variable than those associated with primary tumors. Conclusions LM/SLN biopsy can be successfully performed in patients with IBTR after prior BCS, axillary surgical staging, and adjuvant radiation. This approach illustrates variations in the lymphatic drainage of recurrent breast tumors and may permit the identification of regional metastasis not noted with conventional imaging techniques.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Previous Ipsilateral Complete Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Background

Prior ipsilateral completion axillary lymph node dissection (CALND) may be considered a contraindication to performing a sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in a patient with recurrent breast carcinoma. However, reoperative SLN biopsy following axillary dissection would determine if alternative lymphatic drainage pathways exist. If nodes were found to contain metastatic disease, staging and locoregional control of the disease could be affected.

Materials and Methods

An institutional breast cancer database and electronic health record (IRB No. 102554) prospectively accrued 6225 patients between 1994 and 2007. Under separate IRB approval (IRB No. 102552), this database was queried for patients with a prior history of CALND who received a SLN biopsy. Patients’ demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were recorded.

Results

Of the 6225 patients, 45 (0.7%) were identified as having previously undergone breast-conservation surgery, CALND, and ipsilateral reoperative SLN mapping and biopsy. Of the 45 patients, 13 (29%) had a successful ipsilateral reoperative SLN mapping and biopsy. Nonaxillary drainage was identified in 5 patients with reoperative SLN biopsy.

Conclusion

Reoperative SLN mapping and biopsy is feasible in the setting of local recurrence after previous CALND. This procedure performed for breast cancer recurrence provides important staging information while identifying extra-axillary drainage that could affect both staging and local control.     

Quality of Life After Axillary or Groin Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, With or Without Completion Lymph Node Dissection, in Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma

Background  

The aim of this study was to asses quality of life (QoL) after axillary or inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with or without completion lymph node dissection (CLND) in patients with cutaneous melanoma by comparing patients to a norm group of the general population and by comparing QoL between four patient groups depending on surgical procedure and location, i.e., patients receiving an axillary or groin SLNB, or an axillary or groin CLND.     

Axillary Recurrence After Negative Sentinel Node Biopsy in a Patient with Breast Cancer: Report of a Case

We report a case of axillary recurrence after sentinel node biopsy without axillary lymph node dissection in a patient with breast cancer. A hot and dye-stained node was identified at the primary operation and then at the time of axillary recurrence. Sentinel node biopsy is a promising alternative to axillary lymph node dissection in patients with breast cancer because of the low associated incidence of axillary recurrence.     

Axillary Lymph Node Echo-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Enables Breast Cancer Patients to Avoid a Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy. Preliminary Experience and a Review of the Literature

Purpose For many years, the status of the axillary lymph nodes has been determined by an axillary lymphadenectomy. However, a sentinel lymph node biopsy has been shown to effectively replace the need for an axillary lymphadenectomy in order to determine the axillary staging. This study presents the preliminary results regarding the efficacy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) to identify metastatic axillary lymph nodes in the pre-operative phase. Methods One hundred lymph nodes from 100 patients with histologically and cytologically confirmed breast cancer (cT1–2 cN0) underwent echo-guided FNAC. The diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], negative predictive value [NPV]) for the axillary metastases was evaluated based on the histological findings of either a sentinel lymph node biopsy or an axillary lymphadenectomy as a reference standard. Results It was possible to avoid a sentinel lymph node biopsy in 30% of the cases; the sensitivity was 68%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, and NPV 65%. Echo-guided FNAC of the axillary lymph nodes should thus be included among the regular diagnostic procedures of presurgical staging. Conclusion This simple, inexpensive, and minimally invasive technique makes it possible to avoid the additional cost of a sentinel lymph node biopsy while also sparing the patient the stress of undergoing a second surgery.     

Avoiding Axillary Treatment in Sentinel Lymph Node Micrometastases of Breast Cancer: A Prospective Analysis of Axillary or Distant Recurrence

Background

The need for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) micrometastases remains controversial. The aims of the study were to evaluate the locoregional failure and outcome of breast cancer patients with sentinel node micrometastases who did not undergo completion ALND.

Methods

Between November 2000 and December 2006, SLN biopsy was successfully performed in 1178 patients with invasive breast carcinoma. Only patients with macrometastasis (>2 mm) underwent ALND, while patients with negative SLN or micrometastases did not undergo further treatment of the axilla, by either surgery or radiotherapy. Regarding adjuvant therapy decision, patients with SLN-micrometastases (pN1_mi) were considered as node-positive patients.

Results

Of 1,178 patients, 59 (5%) had micrometastases. Of those with micrometastases, 14 (24%) underwent ALND because the intraoperative study of the SLN yielded a positive result. With a median follow-up of 60 (range, 8–94) months, none of the patients with SLN micrometastases in whom ALND was omitted developed an axillary recurrence, while one patient in whom ALND was performed developed infraclavicular lymph node recurrence. One patient, who declined postoperative breast irradiation, developed breast recurrence and distant metastasis.

Conclusions

Breast cancer patients with SLN micrometastases in whom ALND was omitted had a very low locoregional failure rate. This study supports the theory that ALND might be avoided in these patients, providing that adjuvant systemic treatment equal to treatment provided to treat node-positive disease is administered. However, longer follow-up and results of additional prospective studies are needed.     

The Exportability of the ACOSOG Z0011 Criteria for Omitting Axillary Lymph Node Dissection After Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Findings: A Multicenter Study

Purpose

To determine the exportability of the criteria defined by the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial for selecting patients who are eligible for omitting completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) after a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy result and to investigate whether not following the Z0011 criteria might affect patient outcomes.

Methods

From a multicenter database, we selected 188 patients with positive SLNs and then excluded patients with positive SLNs on immunohistochemistry only. We retrospectively applied the Z0011 criteria and grouped the patients as eligible or ineligible for omitting cALND. The eligible group was compared with the cohort included in the Z0011 trial and with the ineligible group. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were calculated for each group, and univariate analyses assessed associations between the groups and clinicopathological variables.

Results

The final analysis involved 125 patients with positive SLNs. Eighty-seven patients (69.6 %) were potentially eligible for omitting cALND. The estrogen receptor status, T stage, grade, and number of positive non-SLNs were not statistically different between the eligible group and the Z0011 cohort. The ineligible group had significantly more positive non-SLNs (P = 0.01) and a lower 5-year overall survival rate than the eligible group (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The similarity of clinical characteristics between the Z0011 trial cohort and our eligible group confirms the exportability of these criteria to another population. The worse prognosis of patients who did not meet the Z0011 criteria suggests prudence before disregarding or enlarging broadening the indications for omitting cALND.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of the English Literature

BACKGROUND: Although most cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is curable by a variety of treatment modalities, a small subset of tumors recur, metastasize, and result in death. Although risk factors for metastasis have been described, there are little data available on appropriate workup and staging of patients with high-risk SCC. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed reported cases and case series of SCC in which sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was performed to determine whether further research is warranted in developing SLNB as a staging tool for patients with high-risk SCC. METHODS: The English medical literature was reviewed for reports of SLNB in patients with cutaneous SCC. Data from anogenital and nonanogenital cases were collected and analyzed separately. The percentage of cases with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) was calculated. False negative and nondetection rates were tabulated. Rates of local recurrence, nodal and distant metastasis, and disease-specific death were reported. RESULTS: A total of 607 patients with anogenital SCC and 85 patients with nonanogenital SCC were included in the analysis. A SLN could not be identified in 3% of anogenital and 4% of nonanogenital cases. SLNB was positive in 24% of anogenital and 21% of nonanogenital patients. False-negative rates as determined by completion lymphadenectomy were 4% (8/213) and 5% (1/20), respectively. Most false-negative results were reported in studies from 2000 or earlier in which the combination of radioisotope and blue dye was not used in the SLN localization process. Complications were reported rarely and were limited to hematoma, seroma, cutaneous lymphatic fistula, wound infection, and dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the lack of controlled studies, it is premature to draw conclusions regarding the utility of SLNB in SCC. The available data, however, suggest that SLNB accurately diagnoses subclinical lymph node metastasis with few false-negative results and low morbidity. Controlled studies are needed to demonstrate whether early detection of subclinical nodal metastasis will lead to improved disease-free or overall survival for patients with high-risk SCC.     

Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Patients With Local Recurrence After Breast-Conservation Therapy

Background Local recurrence (LR) after breast-conservation therapy for breast cancer occurs in 10% to 15% of cases. A subset of these represents biologically aggressive disease, yet prognostic features for identifying this high-risk category are lacking. We hypothesized that lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy would provide useful information regarding dominant lymphatic drainage patterns of patients with LR. Methods Breast cancer case records involving surgery for LR at the University of Michigan from 2002 to 2004 were reviewed. The lymphatic drainage patterns were compared with those of 117 patients who underwent mapping for primary breast cancer. Results Fourteen LR cases were identified (10 with initial axillary lymph node dissection, 2 with initial sentinel lymph nodes, and 2 with no axillary surgery at the time of primary cancer treatment); lymphatic mapping was performed in 10. The sentinel lymph node identification rate was 90%, the median number of lymph nodes retrieved was 3, and no metastases were detected. Significantly more cases of nonipsilateral axillary sentinel node drainage were observed in mapping procedures performed for LR compared with those for primary breast cancer (67% vs. 15%; P = .001). Conclusions Lymphatic mapping is feasible in patients undergoing mastectomy for LR and is likely to identify aberrantly located sentinel lymph nodes that would otherwise be overlooked with a conventional completion mastectomy.     

Sentinel Node Biopsy Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Spares Breast Cancer Patients Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients is a valuable method to determine the efficacy of chemotherapy and potentially downsize the primary tumor, which facilitates breast-conserving therapy. In 18 studies published about sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the sentinel node was identified in on average 89%, and the false-negative rate was on average 10%. Because of these mediocre results, no author dares to omit axillary clearance just yet. In our institute, sentinel lymph node biopsy is performed before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience with this approach. Methods Sentinel node biopsy was performed before neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 25 T2N0 patients by using lymphoscintigraphy, a gamma ray detection probe, and patent blue dye. Axillary lymph node dissection was performed after chemotherapy if the sentinel node contained metastases. Results Ten patients had a tumor-positive axillary sentinel node, and one patient had an involved lateral intramammary node. Four patients had additional involved nodes in the completion lymph node dissection specimen. The other 14 patients (56%) had a tumor-negative sentinel node and did not undergo axillary lymph node dissection. No recurrences have been observed after a median follow-up of 18 months. Conclusions Fourteen (56%) of the 25 patients were spared axillary lymph node dissection when the sentinel node was found to be disease free. Performing sentinel node biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems successful and reliable in patients with T2N0 breast cancer.     

Intraoperative Pathologic Evaluation of a Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy as a Determinant for Synchronous Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Background: Intraoperative pathologic evaluation of a breast cancer sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy permits synchronous axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), but frozen section is time consuming and potentially inaccurate. This study evaluated intraoperative gross examination and touch prep analysis (TPA) of a breast cancer SLN biopsy as determinants for synchronous ALND.Methods: Intraoperative gross examination/TPA were performed on the SLN of consecutive breast cancer patients from 1997 to 2000. Patients with an intraoperative positive SLN underwent synchronous ALND. Intraoperative results were compared with the final pathology.Results: Thirty-seven of 150 patients had a positive SLN on final pathology. Intraoperative gross examination/TPA identified 54% (20 of 37) of these patients. All intraoperative positive patients underwent synchronous ALND. Of 17 false-negative findings, 53% (9 of 17) had micrometastatic disease. There were no false-positive results. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 54% and 100%, respectively.Conclusions: Gross examination/TPA are simple, rapid techniques for the intraoperative evaluation of a breast cancer SLN. As there were no false-positive results, the rationale behind SLN biopsy was preserved. These techniques permitted synchronous ALND in over half of all patients with a positive SLN. This represents a potential benefit to the patient by eliminating a second hospitalization for delayed ALND.