艾灸肺俞、心俞治疗慢性心衰临床观察

目的观察艾灸配合西药治疗慢性心衰的临床疗效。方法将60例患者随机分为对照组和治疗组,每组30例。对照组给予西药常规治疗;治疗组在西药常规治疗的基础上,采用艾条温和灸双侧肺俞、心俞穴,每穴灸治20 min,每日1次,共灸治4星期。比较两组治疗后临床疗效和心功能相关指标。结果对照组总有效率为76.7%,治疗组总有效率为90.0%,治疗组优于对照组（P〈0.05）;两组治疗后HR、CO、LVEF较治疗前有显著改善（P〈0.01）,治疗组治疗后HR、CO、LVEF与对照组比较有显著差异（P〈0.01）,治疗组治疗后HR、CO、LVEF改善状况优于对照组。结论艾灸配合西药治疗慢性心衰临床疗效优于单纯西药治疗。     

督脉灸治疗慢性肺心病心衰35例

目的 :观察督脉灸对慢性肺心病心衰的治疗效果。方法 :治疗组采用督脉灸配合常规西药应用治疗慢性肺源性心脏病心衰35例,对照组采用常规西药应用治疗慢性肺源性心脏病心衰35例。结果 :在临床疗效方面,治疗组的总有效率为94.3%,而对照组的总有效率为71.4%,治疗组明显优于对照组差异非常显著(P0.01);同时,在心衰标志物(NT-proBNP)方面的比较,治疗组也明显优于对照组(P0.01)。提示:督脉灸治疗慢性肺源性心脏病心衰比单用西药治疗疗效好。     

祛痰通阳汤治疗慢性心力衰竭的临床观察

目的：观察祛痰通阳汤治疗慢性心力衰竭的临床疗效及对心功能的影响。方法：将符合纳入标准的64例患者随机分为治疗组（34例）和对照组（30例）。对照组采用西药常规治疗,治疗组在此基础上加用祛痰通阳汤,连续治疗4周。结果：两组心功能疗效比较,治疗组优于对照组（P〈0.05）,两组治疗后临床疗效比较,治疗组优于对照组,差异显著（P〈0.05）。结论：祛痰通阳汤结合常规西药治疗心力衰竭可改善心功能和提高临床疗效。     

自拟益气活血方治疗气虚血瘀证慢，陡心衰的临床观察

目的：观察自拟益气活血方治疗气虚血瘀证慢性心衰的临床疗效。方法：将62例随机分成对照组32例及治疗组30例。对照组应用常规西药抗心衰治疗,治疗组在常规西药抗心衰治疗基础上加用自拟益气活血方治疗,观察两组的各项指标。结果：两组治疗后心衰积分及中医症状积分均较治疗前均下降、LVEF及6min步行实验较治疗前均增加,BNP较治疗前下降（P〈0．05）：且治疗组在LVEF、BNP、6min步行距离改善情况均优于对照组（P〈0．05）。结论：自拟益气活血方配合西药治疗充血性心力衰竭气虚血瘀证,疗效优于单纯西药常规治疗。     

真武汤加减方治疗心肾阳虚型慢性心力衰竭30例临床观察

目的：观察真武汤加减方结合常规西药治疗心肾阳虚型慢性心力衰竭的临床疗效。方法：将60例慢性心衰患者随机分为治疗组30例和对照组30例。对照组给予常规西药治疗,治疗组在对照组基础上加服真武汤加减方进行治疗。结果：①心功能疗效比较,治疗组总有效率为80.00%。对照组为46.67%,治疗组优于对照组（P<0.01）;②中医证候疗效比较,治疗组总有效率为93.33%,对照组为43.33%,治疗组明显优于对照组（P<0.01）。结论：真武汤加减方结合常规西药治疗慢性心衰,其疗效优于常规西药治疗。     

中西医结合治疗慢性乙型肝炎40例临床观察

目的：观察中西医结合治疗慢性乙型肝炎的临床疗效。方法：将80例慢性乙型肝炎患者随机分为两组各40例,治疗组采用中西医结合治疗,对照组单用西医治疗。结果：总有效率治疗组为97.5%,对照组为67.5%,组间比较,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）。肝功能改善和HBV血清学变化治疗组均优于对照组,组间比较,差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。两组肝功能各项指标治疗前后组内比较,差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.01,P〈0.05）。结论：中西医结合治疗慢性乙型肝炎优于单用西药治疗。     

加减补肺汤结合西药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期35例

目的：观察加减补肺汤结合西药对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的临床疗效及对TNF-α、IL-2和肺功能的影响。方法：将缓解期慢性阻塞性肺疾病肺肾阴虚证患者随机分为治疗组35例、对照组32例,对照组采用西医常规方法治疗,治疗组在对照组治疗基础上加用加减补肺汤治疗。结果：①治疗组综合疗效明显优于对照组（P〈0.05）。②两组治疗后肺功能均有明显改善,与同组治疗前比较,差别均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;两组治疗后比较,治疗组优于对照组（P〈0.05）。③治疗后两组患者IL-2浓度均明显升高（P〈0.01）,同时TNF-α浓度均有显著下降（P〈0.01）;治疗组IL-2、TNF-α变化幅度大于对照组（P〈0.05）。结论：加减补肺汤能明显提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病综合疗效,改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺功能,调节血清炎性介质TNF-α和IL-2。     

灯盏细辛注射液联合参麦注射液治疗慢性心力衰竭的临床观察

目的：观察灯盏细辛注射液联合参麦注射液对慢性心力衰竭患者心功能及血清NT-pro BNP的影响。方法：观察68例气虚血瘀型慢性心力衰竭患者,随机分为治疗组（n=36）和对照组（n=32）,对照对给予常规西药治疗,治疗组在常规西药治疗的基础上给予灯盏细辛注射液和参麦注射液。14天后观察临床疗效、心脏彩色超声和血清NT-pro BNP的变化。结果：治疗组在临床心功能改善方面显效率优于对照组（P〈0.01）;两组左室射血分数均明显提高,均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,但治疗组明显优于对照组（P〈0.05）;血清NT-pro BNP两组治疗前后比较均有显著差异（P〈0.01）,且治疗组下降明显优于对照组（P〈0.01）。结论：灯盏细辛注射液联合参麦注射液治疗慢性心力衰竭,可以明显改善临床症状,改善左室射血分数,并显著降低慢性心力衰竭患者血清NT-pro BNP水平,且安全性高。     

真武汤合五苓散治疗阳虚水泛型心衰35例

目的 观察真武汤合五苓散加味对阳虚水泛型心衰的疗效.方法 将70例慢性心衰患者随机分为治疗组35例、对照组35例,对照组予常规西药治疗,治疗组在对照组基础上服用真武汤合五苓散加减.观察两组心衰、心功能和中医证候疗效.结果 ①心衰疗效比较,治疗组总有效率为85.71％,对照组为62.86％,治疗组优于对照组（P＜0.05）;②心功能疗效比较,治疗组总有效率为80.00％,对照组为57.14％,治疗组优于对照组（P ＜0.05）;③中医证候疗效比较,治疗组总有效率为97.14％,对照组为60.00％,治疗组明显优于对照组（P＜0.01）.结论 真武汤合五苓散加减结合常规西药治疗慢性心衰疗效优于常规西药治疗,值得临床推广运用.     

点灸为主结合用药治疗小儿手足口病临床疗效分析

目的：探讨点灸法治疗小儿手足口病的疗效,观察点灸对皮疹、口腔疱疹消退,便秘或便溏消退,消化不良和厌食等症状的疗阍。方法：46例患儿分为2组,分别采用点灸结合常规西药疗法（灸药组22例）、常规西医疗法（西药组24例）,2组治疗7d后分别采用疗效指数综合判定疗效,比较2组疗效差异。结果：灸药组疗效优于西药组,显效率比较有显著性差异（P〈0．05）。2组间在皮疹、口腔疱疹,便秘或便溏,消化不良和厌食消退时间上比较,差异均有显著性（P〈0．05）,灸药组优于西药组。结论：点灸结合常规西药疗法治疗小儿手足口病疗效明显,可有效地改善消化道等症状,缩短病程,减少患者痛苦。     

Observation on therapeutic effect of mild moxibustion plus acupoint injection for optic atrophy

Objective:To observe the clinical effect of mild moxibustion plus acupoint injection for optic atrophy.Methods:Ninety-four patients with optic atrophy were divided into a treatment group(51 cases)and a control group(43 cases).The treatment group was treated with mild moxibustion plus acupoint injection,and the control group was treated with medications.After three courses,the change of vision was observed.Results:The total effective rate was 82.4%in the treatment group and41.9%in the control group,with a statistical difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion:Moxibustion plus acupoint injection is an effective method to treat optic atrophy.     

针刺配合雷火灸治疗颈型颈椎病临床研究

目的：观察针刺配合雷火灸治疗颈型颈椎病的临床疗效。方法：将符合纳入标准的60例颈型颈椎病患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组30例。治疗组采用针刺配合雷火灸治疗;对照组采用单纯针刺治疗。观察治疗前后症状、体征积分及视觉模拟量表（Visual Analogue Scale,VAS）评分的变化。结果：治疗组在提高临床疗效、降低VAS评分,改善临床症状、体征积分方面均优于对照组（P〈0.01 或P〈0.05）。差异均有统计学意义。结论：针刺配合雷火灸能明显减轻颈型颈椎病患者的疼痛症状,改善颈椎功能。     

推拿结合灸法治疗慢性疲劳综合征临床研究(英文)

目的:观察推拿结合灸法治疗对慢性疲劳综合征患者的影响。方法:将60例符合纳入标准的慢性疲劳综合征(Chronic Fatigue Syndrome,CFS)患者,随机分为2组,治疗组30例予推拿结合雷火灸治疗,对照组30例予普通针刺治疗。治疗4星期后进行临床疗效比较。结果:治疗组治愈率为36.7%,总有效率为93.3%,对照组治愈率为16.7%,总有效率为76.7%,两组治愈率和总有效率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:推拿结合雷火灸治疗CFS疗效优于普通针刺。     

Treatment of primary dysmenorrhea with herb-partitioned moxibustion plus ultra-short wave

Objective： To observe the clinical effect of herb-partitioned moxibustion plus ultra-short wave for primary dysmenorrhea （PD）. Methods： One hundred and thirty patients with PD were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group, 65 cases in each group. Patients in the treatment group were treated with herb-partitioned moxibustion plus ultra-short wave, while patients in the control group were treated with oral administration of Ibuprofen sustained-release capsules. After completing three courses of treatments, the clinical effects were evaluated by professional researchers. Results： The recovery rate of the treatment group was 58.5%, and the total effective rater was 98.5%; versus 24.6% and 81.5% in the control group. The between-group differences were statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： Herb-partitioned moxibustion plus ultra-short wave is an easy-to-operate and effective therapy for PD.     

艾炷灸治疗慢性腹泻临床观察

目的：观察艾灸对慢性顽固性腹泻的疗效。方法：将符合纳入标准的60例患者随机分为2组,治疗组30 例,予艾炷灸脾俞、肾俞等穴治疗;对照组予口服中药治疗。治疗1个疗程后比较两组疗效。结果：治疗组总有效率高于对照组,且两组比较差异具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：艾炷灸治疗慢性顽固性腹泻疗效优于口服中药。     

灸药结合治疗颈性眩晕临床观察

目的：观察艾灸联合盐酸倍他司汀治疗颈性眩晕的临床疗效。方法：将 120 例颈性眩晕患者随机分为两组,观察组 60 例,予艾灸结合静脉滴注盐酸倍他司汀治疗;对照组 60 例,予单纯静脉滴注盐酸倍他司汀治疗。观察治疗前后患者临床症状及功能评分变化,比较两组临床疗效。结果：与本组治疗前比较,两组患者治疗后眩晕症状及功能评分均有明显改善（P〈0.01）。治疗后组间比较,观察组眩晕症状及功能评分改善明显优于对照组（P〈0.01）。两组愈显率及总有效率亦有统计学差异（均P〈0.05）,提示观察组疗效优于对照组。结论：灸法联合盐酸倍他司汀治疗颈性眩晕疗效优于单纯盐酸倍他司汀治疗。     

推拿结合温针治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床观察

目的:观察推拿结合温针治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效.方法:将90例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机分为两组,观察组45例,采用推拿结合温针治疗;对照组45例,采用单纯推拿治疗.结果:观察组的总有效率为88.9％,对照组的总有效率为75.6％,两组总有效率具有统计学差异(P＜0.01).结论:推拿结合温针治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效优于单纯推拿手法治疗.     

Observation on clinical effect of superficial needling for intractable humeral epicondylitis

Objective： To observe the clinical effect of superficial needling for ntractable humeral epicondylitis. Methods： Sixty cases in conformity with the inclusion criteria of intractable humeral epicondylitis were randomly divided into two groups, 30 cases in each. The cases in the superficial needling group were treated by superficial needling plus moxibustion, while those in the electro- acupuncture （EA） group were treated by EA plus moxibustion. After treatment, the improvement of the clinical symptoms and signs were compared between the two groups. Results： The curative rate was 80.0% and the total effective rate was 96.7% in the superficial needling group. The curative rate was 60.0% and the total effective rate was 83.3% in the EA group. The differences in the clinical effects between the two groups were statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： The therapeutic effect of superficial needling plus moxibustion for intractable humeral epicondylitis is better than that of EA plus moxibustion.     

Clinical Study on Moxibustion at Shenque （CV 8） for Chronic Urticaria

Objective： To observe the safety and efficacy of moxibustion at Shenque （CV 8） for chronic urticaria. Methods： A total of 80 cases who met the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated into a treatment group and a control group, 40 in each. Cases in the treatment group were treated with thunder-fire moxibustion at Shenque （CV 8）, whereas cases in the control group were treated with Mizolastine. Changes in clinical symptoms such as itching and skin lesion were observed before and after treatment and the therapeutic efficacies were assessed. Results： After treatment, the total scores of clinical symptoms in both groups were markedly reduced （P〈0.05）, and the reduction was more significant in the treatment group than that in the control group （P〈0.05）. The total effective rate in the treatment group was 77.5%, versus 65.0% in the control group, showing no significant difference （P〉0.05）. The Ridit analysis showed a between-group significant difference in therapeutic efficacy grades （P〈0.05）. There were no reports of adverse reactions in the treatment group and 2 cases experienced mild somnolence in the control group. Conclusion： With an exact effect for chronic urticaria, moxibustion at Shenque （CV 8） obtained better results in overall efficacy and improving symptoms than oral administration of Mizolastine.     

Comparative study on the analgesic effects of different moxibustion methods with tai-yi moxa stick in treating primary dysmenorrhea

Objective： To compare the therapeutic effects of two different moxibustion methods both with tai-yi moxa stick in treating primary dysmenorrhea. Methods： Forty-three patients were randomized into two groups by the random number table according to their treatment orders. The causalgic group was intervened by causalgic stimulation with tai-yi moxa stick while the tepid group was treated by mild thermal stimulation with tai-yi moxa stick. Shiqizhui（EX-B 8） was selected for both groups. Visual analogue scale（VAS） was used for observation before and during the treatment by every 10 min to compare the clinical efficacies between the two groups. Results： Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in pain intensity between the two groups（P〉0.05）. After treatment, both groups achieved significant improvements in pain intensity（P 〈 0.05）, but the inter-group difference in pain intensity was still statistically insignificant（P 〉 0.05）, but the difference was enlarged comparing with that before treatment. The pain relief during the first 10 min of treatment was slower in the causalgic group than that in the tepid group. However, during the later 20 min, the pain relief in the calsalgia group gradually outpaced that in the tepid group. Conclusion： The two moxibustion methods with tai-yi moxa stick both have a good instant analgesic effect in treating primary dysmenorrhea. For patients with primary dysmenorrhea, if 30 min is regarded as the treatment time, mild stimulation was suggested to be used for the first 10 min, and causalgic stimulation for the later 20 min to achieve a better curative effect.