旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣在青壮年陈旧性股骨颈骨折中的应用

目的探讨应用带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣进行骨折端植骨在青壮年陈旧性股骨颈骨折治疗中的临床效果。方法对6例青壮年陈旧性股骨颈骨折均采用切开复位,C型臂X线机透视下用2或3枚空心钉内固定,在骨折近远端凿取5．0cm×2．5cm×1．5cm骨槽,带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣植于骨槽内后用可吸收螺钉固定。结果1例术后3个月骨折还未达到骨性愈合,负重下床行走,逐渐出现髋部疼痛,1年后复诊骨折已骨性愈合,髋关节间隙变窄,仍在观察随访中。其余患者经过1～3年随访,股骨颈骨折均得到了骨性愈合,平均愈合时间为6个月,未发现股骨头囊性变及股骨头塌陷。结论带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣血供充足,血管解剖恒定,切取较容易,且血管蒂长,转移方便,采用其作骨折端植骨可有效促进骨折愈合,降低股骨头坏死发生概率,是治疗青壮年陈旧性股骨颈骨折较为理想的方法之一。     

带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣植骨治疗成人股骨颈骨折

目的 :探讨成人股骨颈骨折的手术治疗方法。方法 :自 1 990年～ 1 996年对 35例成人股骨颈骨折采用改良Smith Petersen切口 ,切开复位骨圆针内固定 ,带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣植骨治疗。结果 :35例随访 ,平均 2 6个月 ,内固定物均已取出 ,骨折愈合率 91 .9% ,3例发生不愈合并股骨头缺血性坏死 ,均为高龄患者。结论 :采用带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣治疗股骨颈骨折 ,局部有丰富的血液供应 ,同时给以良好的固定 ,增强了骨折部的稳定性 ,促进骨折愈合 ,降低了股骨头缺血坏死的发生率。本法适用于青壮年股骨颈骨折的头下型及头颈型和陈旧性骨折的病例。此法优点在于旋髂深血管解剖位置固定 ,手术操作安全 ,不需血管吻合 ,植骨块移动范围大 ,手术成功率高     

带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣治疗股骨颈骨折27例

目的 探讨应用带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣转位移植手术治疗中年股骨颈骨折的临床疗效.方法 对27例中年Garden Ⅲ、Garden Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折采用切开复位内固定、带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣转位移植于股骨颈前部骨槽内的方法进行治疗.结果 术后随访12～110个月,股骨颈骨折全部骨性愈合,平均愈合时间7.8个月,无发生骨折不愈合及股骨头坏死,关节功能正常.临床结果评定,优22例,良4例,差1例.结论 带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣治疗中年移位型股骨颈骨折,术后发生骨不连和股骨头坏死几率低,临床效果好,是治疗股骨颈骨折较理想的方法.     

带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨植骨治疗股骨颈骨折和股骨大粗隆病损

目的 分析和总结带旋髂深血管蒂骼骨植骨治疗股骨颈骨折和股骨大粗隆病损的经验和体会。方法 采用带旋髂深血管蒂骼骨植骨治疗陈旧性股骨颈骨折不愈合、股骨颈骨囊肿、股骨大粗隆骨巨细胞瘤共27例。术中先解剖出旋髂深血管,于股骨颈前外侧开凿骨槽／清除肿瘤病变组织,取与骨槽／瘤位相应口径的带旋髂深血管蒂的髂骨块,嵌入骨槽／瘤床内,空隙部位用髂骨碎条块充填。结果 平均随访3年8个月（11个月－7年）,疗效满意。X线复查见股骨颈骨折愈合良好,肿瘤辞除后的骨缺损均修复。结论 带旋髂深血管蒂的髂骨植骨治疗股骨颈骨折和股骨大粗隆病损是一种可选择的行之有效的方法。     

多肌蒂髂骨瓣治疗陈旧性股骨颈骨折

目的探讨治疗陈旧性青壮年股骨颈骨折的新技术：方法对11例陈旧性股骨颈骨折切开复位、二枚螺纹钉内固定，用缝匠肌阔筋膜张肌蒂髂骨瓣植骨、克氏针固定，适度制动及功能锻炼。结果术后平均132d骨折均获愈合，平均随访36个月，按Harris评分优7例，良2例，可1例，关节功能满意，恢复日常工作，无股骨头缺血坏死。结论采用切开复位内固定加多肌蒂髂骨瓣植骨治疗陈旧性青壮年股骨颈骨折，对促进骨折愈合、预防股骨头缺血坏死具有重要价值。     

微创空心钉内固定加带血管蒂髂骨瓣植骨术治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折

目的讨论微创切开复位空心加压螺钉内固定加带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣植骨术治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折的手术方法及临床疗效。方法对12例青壮年股骨颈骨折采用部分髂腹股沟入路切口联合部分髋关节前侧髂股骨入路,微创切开复位空心加压螺钉内固定加带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣植骨术治疗。结果12例骨折愈合时间3～8个月,无骨折不愈合及股骨头缺血坏死发生,髋关节功能良好。结论微创切开复位空心加压螺钉内固定加带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣植骨术是治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折非常有效的方法。     

空心加压螺钉内固定联合带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣移植术治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折

目的 探讨空心加压螺钉内固定联合带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣移植术治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效.方法 采用空心加压螺钉内固定联合带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣移植术治疗股骨颈骨折102例.结果 91例获得随访,时间11个月～8年,骨折平均愈合时间7.1个月.髋关节功能采用Harris评分,优良率87.9%.结论 空心加压螺钉内固定联合带旋髂深血...     

带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣移植治疗青壮年移位股骨颈骨折

目的研究带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣移植治疗青壮年移位股骨颈骨折的临床疗效,探讨其临床应用价值。方法收治76例青壮年移位股骨颈骨折患者,随机分为植骨联合内固定组和单纯内固定组,每组38例。植骨联合内固定组行切开复位带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣移植并加压空心螺钉固定治疗;单纯内固定组仅行切开复位加压空心螺钉固定。术后对两组骨折平均愈合时间,Harris髋关节功能评分及并发症发生率等进行对比研究。结果所有病例随访19～73个月,平均42.8个月。植骨联合内固定组骨折平均愈合时间3.6个月,Harris评分84.6分,1例骨折不愈合,3例股骨头坏死,2例畸形愈合,并发症发生率为15.8%,术后功能及影像学结果满意。单纯内固定组骨折平均愈合时间为4.8个月,Harris评分75.3分,术后发生骨折不愈合3例,股骨头坏死7例,畸形愈合3例,并发症发生率为34.2%,两组差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论带旋髂深血管蒂髂骨瓣移植可以改善股骨头和股骨颈的血运,加速骨折愈合并减少并发症发生,是治疗青壮年移位股骨颈骨折的理想方法之一。     

带旋髂深动脉髂骨瓣在治疗股骨颈骨折中的临床应用

目的 报道带旋髂深动脉的髂骨瓣在股骨颈骨折治疗中的部效。方法 采用带旋髂深动脉的髂骨瓣移植于股骨颈骨折处骨槽内，临床应用32例。结果 经2-7年随访，术后4-6个月达骨性愈合，髂关节功能优良。结论 带旋髂深动脉的髂骨瓣血运丰富，能促进骨折愈合，减少股骨坏死，是治疗股骨颈骨折的良好方法。     

带缝匠肌蒂髂骨瓣植骨治疗成人股骨颈骨折

对28例成人股骨颈骨折采用切开复位加压螺钉加斯氏针内固定，带缝匠肌蒂髂骨瓣植骨治疗，随访时间平均22个月（6个月-4年），25例骨愈合（89.3%)，3例高龄患发生不愈合伴股骨头缺血性坏死，采用带缝匠肌蒂髂骨瓣治疗股骨颈骨折，由于有充足的血液供应，同时结合良好的内固定，能促进骨折仍合，降低股骨头缺血性坏死率。本方法适用于陈旧性股骨颈骨折及青壮年新鲜股骨颈骨折的头下型及经颈型，此法属于带恒定肌蒂骨块移植，取骨剖位恒定，取骨量多，蒂的游离范围较大，手术操作安全，简单易行而可靠。     

同种异体大块髂骨重建自体大块髂骨供骨后骨缺损的研究

骨不连、骨缺损的治疗是骨科医生常面临的一个问题。自体骨因兼有骨诱导活性和骨传导作用，且具有成骨作用的骨髓细胞，成骨效果最好，故目前仍是植骨的“金标准”。虽然植骨材料目前有同种异体骨、异种骨、人工骨等多种选择，但在已严重骨缺损、骨萎缩的骨不连端，仍需要取含丰富松质骨的大块髂骨进行植骨。临床上常可见到患者术后供骨区不同程度的慢性疼痛、局部组织塌陷、髂嵴部变形等并发症.     

An anomalous right iliac artery presenting as iliac stenosis

An anatomical anomaly of pre-aortic inferior vena cava and retro-psoas iliac artery in a 33-year-old female is reported. This patient presented with severe right leg claudication and was successfully managed by implantation of an aortofemoral graft.     

Using bilateral iliac branch devices for endovascular iliac aneurysm repair

Introduction: The endovascular repair of bilateral iliac aneurysms using bilateral Iliac Branch Devices (IBDs) has been infrequently performed and reported. We aim to describe this technique and report on the results of our case series. Methods: Three different device designs are available. The procedural options include a totally transfemoral approach, or a combined transfemoral and brachial approach. Clinical records for patients who have had this procedure were reviewed. Results: The indications for the technique include bilateral common iliac artery aneurysm repair, with or without concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Considerations include the timing of main body endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) device introduction, the use of a proximal access site and the type of IIA stent‐graft that is used. Between 2007 and 2010, six patients had bilateral IBD implantation. All patients required an EVAR main body device in addition to bilateral IBDs. Eighty‐three per cent were males, mean age was 73 years. Mean follow up was 15 months. Technical success was obtained in 100% of cases. There was one branch occlusion (8.3%). There were no type I endoleaks. One patient had a type II endoleak. Conclusions: Bilateral IBDs can be used safely and with excellent rates of technical success and branch patency in appropriately selected patients.     

Isolated iliac aneurysms

Isolated iliac aneurysms are relatively infrequent, often difficult to detect and therefore rarely considered in the differential diagnosis. Because of their close anatomical relationship to the ureters, bladder, colon, pelvic veins, femoral and sciatic nerve roots one is often misled. The consequences can be grave; chronic ureteric obstruction for instance can cause damage to one or both kidneys. With the growing frequency of tube grafting for aortic aneurysms it becomes increasingly important to consider the prevalence and incidence of isolated iliac aneurysms. The aim of this study is to report the incidence, clinical course and outcome of these lesions. In a consecutive series of 678 aorto-iliac aneurysms in the years 1972-1988 there were 53 isolated iliac aneurysms (7%) ranging in size from 3.5-14 cm whereas the reported incidence in the literature lies between 1-2%; the prevalence in consecutive autopsy series is even less than 1%. CT scanning proved to be the gold standard for the evaluation of pelvic aneurysmal disease whilst angiograms were of little help. A palpable mass was present in nine cases; GI-tract signs in 12 (five patients being operated on for suspicion of appendicitis or sigmoiditis), the genito-urinary tract was involved in eight cases, sciatic or femoral root nerve compression occurred in seven, recurrent pulmonary embolism in two, lower extremity ischaemia in seven and a-v fistula in one. The male:female ratio was 51:2 and that of ruptured to non-ruptured aneurysms 15:38. The site of isolated iliac aneurysms was the common and/or the internal iliac artery uni- or bilaterally. The external iliac artery was never involved.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Retroperitoneal iliac fossa abscess: a complication of suppurative iliac lymphadenitis

The clinicopathologic manifestations in four patients with staphylococcal abscess localized to the retroperitoneal iliac fossa are presented. This type of abscess may represent a distinct entity and is most likely a complication of suppurative iliac lymphadenitis.Retroperitoneal abscesses localized to the iliac fossa rarely have any osseous component. Extraperitoneal drainage is curative.     

Comparing patency rates between external iliac and common iliac artery stents

PURPOSE: Placement of intraluminal stents in the common iliac artery (CIA) and external iliac artery (EIA) has become an accepted therapy for treating localized arterial stenoses. The purpose of this study was to compare anatomic patency rates of stents placed in the EIA and CIA for occlusive disease. METHODS: A radiologic computer database was used to identify 69 consecutive male patients at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center from February 1, 1993, through January 31, 1999, who underwent placement of 98 stents (82 Wallstents and 16 Palmaz stents) for physiologically significant iliac artery occlusive disease and varying degrees of chronic limb ischemia. Patients were followed up with surveillance duplex ultrasound scanning examinations 1 day after procedure, 3 months after procedure, and then at 6-month intervals after stent placement. Follow-up angiograms were performed for patients with duplex ultrasound scans that revealed velocities greater than 300 cm/s. Patient risk factors, iliac artery runoff, concomitant outflow procedures, and anatomic patency rates were compared between patients receiving EIA stents and those receiving CIA stents. RESULTS: The mean age for the EIA stent group was 69 +/- 1 years versus 66 +/- 1 years (P =.03) for the CIA stent group. Mean follow-up was 21.4 +/- 2.1 months (+/- SE) for all patients. Patients with EIA stents had more ischemic lower limbs when compared with patients who had CIA stents (P =.05). No differences were found between groups in risk factor analysis (P = not significant). Lesion lengths were similar between groups: EIA, 4.6 +/- 0.6 cm, and CIA, 5. 3 +/- 0.8 cm (P = not significant). The following differences were noted on primary patency rates (EIA group vs CIA group): 1 year (93% vs 88%), 2 years (91% vs 85%), and 3 years (90% vs 78%) (Cox proportional hazards; P =.13). CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic patency rates for EIA and CIA stents appear to be similar despite the fact that patients with EIA stents were older and had more ischemic limbs compared with the patients who had CIA stents.     

髂内动脉在肾移植术后髂外动脉出血中的应用

目的:探讨肾移植术后感染性外动脉移植肾动脉吻合口出血的处理。方法:采用自体髂内动脉片或段修补、串接治疗髂外动脉吻合口大出血。结果:修复后的髂外动脉血流通畅,患侧下肢血供良好。结论:感染性移植肾动脉髂外动脉吻合口出血为肾移植术后严重并发症,单纯缝扎止血常难以奏效,与其他方法比较,自体髂内动脉片或段修补、串接修补缺损的髂外动脉操作简单,效果非常满意。     

Deep circumflex iliac perforator flap with iliac crest for mandibular reconstruction.

The deep circumflex iliac myocutaneous perforator (DCIP) flap with iliac crest was used to reconstruct oromandibular defects in 10 patients. In seven of the patients a dominant perforator was found preoperatively using a Doppler flowmeter; in five of these seven patients a DCIP flap was successfully transferred. In two of the seven patients the dominant perforators were too narrow: one patient underwent a standard osteocutaneous flap transfer and one patient underwent a second flap transfer. In three patients no dominant perforator was found before or during surgery. The freedom of the DCIP flap from the harvested iliac crest facilitates correct positioning. However, to ensure that the DCIP flap can be safely elevated, the presence of perforators must be confirmed preoperatively. Even when a perforator has been identified, complicated dissection may be necessary. We stress the importance of a thorough knowledge of the anatomy of second flaps and of obtaining informed consent to use them.