Malignancies after kidney transplantation

The most effective treatment of end-stage renal disease is renal transplantation; its superiority to prolong the longevity of patients is well established. Patient and graft survivals have improved with more potent immunosuppression but this advance has been associated with an increased incidence of cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of cancer among 265 kidney transplant recipients engrafted between 1968 and October 2004. The overall prevalence of de novo malignancies was 3%. The mean age at diagnosis was 53.3 years (range, 28-63 years) and the duration of the transplant was 11.6 years (range, 0.3-33 years). One patient among 127 (0.8%) who had a history of less than 3 years under immunosuppression, developed a posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Among the 138 patients who had more than 3 years immunosuppression, 7 (5%) developed neoplasms of vulva, colon, native kidneys, prostatic gland, and ovary. One patient was affected by de novo carcinoma in the transplanted kidney. Compared with other published studies, our early cancer prevalence is low, possibly due to a careful history before grafting, good HLA matching, and abstinence from anti-T-cell therapy for treatment of acute rejection episodes. The low level of immunosuppression may account for the low prevalence of neoplasia. The risk of developing a malignancy increases with long-term immunosuppression, comparable with most reports.     

De novo malignancies after kidney and liver transplantations: experience on 582 consecutive cases

De novo malignancies after transplantation are a growing problem of solid organ transplant recipients, due to longer survival follow-up under chronic immunosuppression. The aim of this study was to analyze a population of 582 consecutive kidney (n = 382) and liver (n = 202) transplant recipients, who survived at least 12 months after transplantation, at a single transplant center for the development of de novo cancers. The incidence of de novo malignancies was 7% after both renal and liver transplantation. The median elapsed time from transplant to the diagnosis of de novo malignancy was 45 months (range 3 to 220) months for kidney and 37 months (range 12 to 101 months) for liver transplants. Skin cancers were the most common within renal recipients, while gastroenteric cancers were more frequently encountered in liver transplants. Oropharyngeal and upper digestive tract tumors were always associated with a history of chronic alcohol consumption in liver recipients. Liver transplant recipients treated for acute rejection had a worse cancer prognosis than patients without rejection 1- and 2-year survivals 83% and 63% versus 36% and 17% (P = .026). The estimated 1- and 2-year survival rates for all types of de novo malignancies were 79% and 66%, including 64% and 51% for solid organ tumors versus 89% and 89% for skin cancers and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) (P = .17) in renal transplants and 70% and 42%, including 57% and 28% for solid organ tumors versus 85% and 64% for skin cancers and PTLD (P = .43) in liver transplants respectively.     

Association of the type of induction immunosuppression with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, graft survival, and patient survival after primary kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: The use of antilymphocyte antibodies for induction therapy or for treatment for rejection has been associated with an increased risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). The authors investigated the incidence of PTLD after monoclonal antilymphocyte, polyclonal antilymphocyte, interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antibody, or no induction therapy in primary kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: A multivariate Cox analysis of 38,519 primary kidney transplants from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2000, was performed to compare the incidence of PTLD, graft survival, and patient survival among the induction groups. RESULTS: The actual incidence of PTLD was 0.85% in 2,713 recipients with monoclonal, 0.81% in 4,343 with polyclonal, 0.50% in 7,800 with IL-2, and 0.51% in 23,663 recipients with no induction therapy (P=0.02). The Cox model indicated that as compared with no induction, the increased risk of PTLD was 72% with monoclonal (P=0.03), 29% with polyclonal (P=0.27), and 14% with IL-2 induction (P=0.52). IL-2 receptor antibody was associated with a 17% reduced risk of graft loss (P=0.002) and a 21% reduced risk of mortality (P=0.005) compared with no induction. Monoclonal and polyclonal induction therapies were not associated with a reduced risk of graft loss or mortality. Mycophenolate mofetil discharge maintenance immunosuppression was associated with a significantly reduced risk of PTLD and graft loss compared with azathioprine. CONCLUSIONS: Among induction therapies, IL-2 receptor antibody induction was associated with the smallest risk of PTLD and improved graft and patient survival. Monoclonal or polyclonal induction was not associated with improved graft or patient survival, and monoclonal induction was associated with an increased risk of PTLD.     

Dissociation of Depletional Induction and Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disease in Kidney Recipients Treated With Alemtuzumab

Transplant patients are at the risk for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), a virally-driven malignancy. Induction with the depleting antibody preparations Thymoglobulin and OKT3 is associated with PTLD suggesting that the T-cell depletion increases PTLD risk. We therefore studied 59 560 kidney recipients from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) database for a relationship between induction agent use and PTLD. Two agents with comparable T-cell depletional effects, alemtuzumab and Thymoglobulin, were compared to nondepletional induction agents or no induction. The overall incidence of PTLD was 0.46% and differed significantly by induction strategy (p < 0.01): without induction (0.43%), basiliximab (0.38%), daclizumab (0.33%), Thymoglobulin (0.67%) and alemtuzumab (0.37%). Thymoglobulin was associated with significantly increased PTLD risk (p = 0.0025), but alemtuzumab (p = 0.74), basiliximab (p = 0.33) and daclizumab, which trended toward a protective effect (p = 0.06), were not. Alemtuzumab and Thymoglobulin treated patients did not differ in any established parameter affecting PTLD risk although alemtuzumab is known to have a more pronounced B-cell depleting effect. Interestingly, maintenance therapy with an mTOR inhibitor was strongly associated with PTLD (0.71%, p < 0.0001). Thus, depletional induction is not an independent risk factor for PTLD. Rather, maintenance drug selection or perhaps the balance between B- and T-cell depletion may be more relevant determinants of PTLD risk.     

De novo tumors after kidney transplantation: the Budapest experience

In a retrospective study we analyzed the incidence and characteristics of de novo tumors developing in renal transplant recipients treated in our center. The 5% incidence de novo tumors developing among patients treated with azathioprine and prednisolone (n = 241) was similar to the 5.4% incidence of de novo tumors developing among patients treated with calcineurin-based immunosuppression (n = 1918). The most common malignancies among our patients were basal cell (21.7%) and squamous cell (13.9%) carcinomas of the skin, followed by urogenital (10.4%) and lung malformations (9.6%). A high incidence of Kaposi's sarcoma (9.6%; half cutaneous and half visceral) and a lower than expected incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD; 3.5%) was found. Among patients developing de novo tumors, the incidence of death with a functioning graft was higher than among recipients without tumors. Moreover, the incidence of tumor-related death was high among the de novo tumor recipients. Among our recipients, the most aggressive tumors were Kaposi's sarcoma, lung tumors, lymphomas, and gastrointestinal tumors, which occurred relatively early after transplantation and were the cause of death in most cases. Compared to tumor registry data, we found an inverse basal-to-squamous cell carcinoma ratio, a lower incidence of PTLD, and a higher incidence of Kaposi's sarcoma.     

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders after renal transplantation in the United States in era of modern immunosuppression

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) still represent a major preoccupation after renal transplantation, even in the most recent years. METHODS: We analyzed the incidence, risk, and prognostic factors of PTLD in a cohort of kidney recipients using the United States Renal Data System. RESULTS: Among 25,127 Medicare patients transplanted between 1996 and 2000, 344 developed a PTLD defined as a non-Hodgkin lymphoma (1.4%). History of pretransplant malignancy (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR]=3.54, CI 2.31-5.43), younger age (AHR=1.91, CI 1.18-3.1), fewer HLA matches (AHR=1.32, CI 1.1-1.59) and treatment by ATG (AHR=1.55, CI 1.2-1.99) and OKT3 (AHR=1.37, CI 1-1.76), especially if given for rejection therapy were associated with an increased risk of PTLD. Mycophenolate and azathioprine were associated with a lower risk of PTLD (AHR=0.6, CI 0.47-0.78 and AHR=0.66, CI 0.46-0.95, respectively). IL2-receptor inhibitors and sirolimus did not modify the risk of PTLD. Patients without induction therapy treated with tacrolimus were at greater risk of lymphoma than those treated with new formulations of cyclosporine and those treated with antimetabolites (mycophenolate and azathioprine) have a lower risk of PTLD than those without. Patients with PTLD had poor survival (64% vs. 80% at 5 years). Older age, pretransplant malignancy and OKT3 were risk factors for death whereas treatment with mycophenolate was associated with a better survival (AHR=0.49, CI=0.28-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the contribution of patient history and immunosuppression in the risk of PTLD in the era of modern immunosuppression.     

Malignant neoplasms in cardiac transplant recipients

Purpose: Heart transplant recipients have an increased risk of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) associated with monoclonal antilymphocyte (OKT₃) immunosuppression and Epstein-Barr viral (EBV) infections. These studies were undertaken to determine whether polyclonal antilymphocyte therapy can reduce the incidence of malignant neoplasia.Methods: We reviewed our experience with polyclonal induction therapy to assess the risk of malignant neoplasms in 223 transplant recipients between April 1985 and September 1998. Posttransplant immunosuppression therapy employed either polyclonal antilymphocyte or antithymocyte globulin given as 10mg/kg/day in divided doses for 3 days followed by cyclosporine, azothioprine, and steroids. OKT₃ was used in only 2 patients for persistent rejection.Results: Twenty-nine patients developed invasive malignant neoplasms (a mean of 57.9 months posttransplant; range 7 to 125). Invasive malignancies included carcinoma of the lung (7 patients), colon (3), kidney (3), bladder (2), prostate (1), squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue (1), malignant melanoma (2), Kaposi’s sarcoma (1), and squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (1). Five patients developed lymphoma: 3 patients had PTLD, 2 patients had Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Positive EBV IgG titers (>4:1) were found in 3 patients, but only 1 of these developed PTLD and none of these patients received OKT₃. Of the 29 patients with invasive malignancy, 13 (45%) died secondary to their malignancy; 5 died of unrelated causes (sepsis, myocardial infarction, and organ failure); and 11 are alive after surgical excision and/or chemotherapy. The age-adjusted incidence of invasive neoplasm was 7.33 (95% 5.95 confidence interval 8.09) times as great as rates for the general population in the State of Michigan between 1988 and 1995.Conclusion: While induction polyclonal antilymphocyte therapy may reduce the risk of PTLD, the incidence of posttransplant malignancy remains high. A vigilant cancer surveillance protocol is mandatory in these high-risk patients.     

Maintenance immunosuppression with target-of-rapamycin inhibitors is associated with a reduced incidence of de novo malignancies

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive drug therapy has been identified as one etiological factor in the increased incidence of and deaths from malignancies in renal transplant recipients. In animal models, calcineurin inhibitors have a positive growth effect, whereas target-of-rapamycin (TOR) inhibitors have a negative growth effect on malignant cells. METHODS: A multivariate analysis of posttransplant malignancies in 33,249 deceased donor primary solitary renal recipients reported by 264 kidney transplant programs to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database from July 1, 1996 to December 31, 2001 was performed. Data were censored at 963 days to allow comparable follow-up time among drug treatment groups. The incidence and relative risks of any de novo malignancy (skin and solid) and for non-skin solid malignancies in patients receiving TOR inhibitors compared to patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors were the primary endpoints. RESULTS: The incidence rates of patients with any de novo posttransplant malignancy were 0.60% with sirolimus/everolimus alone, 0.60% with sirolimus/everolimus + cyclosporine/tacrolimus, and 1.81% with cyclosporine/tacrolimus (P<0.0001); the rates with a de novo solid tumor were 0%, 0.47%, and 1.00%, respectively. In the Cox regression model the relative risk associated with sirolimus/everolimus immunosuppression for any de novo cancer was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.24-0.64; P=0.0002) and for de novo solid cancer was 0.44 (0.24-0.82; P=0.0092). Other significant risk factors were male sex, adult age group, white race, and history of a malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance immunosuppression with the TOR inhibitor drugs, sirolimus and everolimus, is associated with a significantly reduced risk of developing any posttransplant de novo malignancy and non-skin solid malignancy.     

Epstein–Barr virus and renal transplantation

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is a gamma herpesvirus associated with diseases ranging from asymptomatic viremia to post-transplant malignancies in kidney transplant recipients. EBV specifically is associated with post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), in kidney transplant recipients, with increased risk in EBV seronegative patients with EBV seropositive donors on intensified immunosuppression. The diagnosis of PTLD relies on clinical suspicion plus tissue biopsy with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of blood currently used for risk determination in high-risk recipients. Therapeutic strategies for PTLD include reduction of immunosuppression, chemotherapy and rituximab, and consideration of sirolimus-based immunosuppression. Antivirals such as ganciclovir are used to prevent reactivation of cytomegalovirus and other herpes viruses but are not onco-therapeutic. Radiation therapy or surgery is indicated for bulky, disseminated or recalcitrant disease. Prognosis varies depending on the type of malignancy identified and stage of disease.     

肾移植受者新发恶性肿瘤后免疫抑制方案的调整

目的总结肾移植后新发恶性肿瘤患者免疫抑制治疗方案的调整经验。方法分析1978年1月至2011年6月期间3279例肾移植受者中67例新发恶性肿瘤患者的临床资料。结果术后新发恶性肿瘤中,泌尿生殖系统恶性肿瘤最为常见（56.7%）。予以外科手术与免疫抑制剂减至半量或将钙调磷酸酶抑制剂转换为雷帕霉素相结合的个体化治疗方案。5年患者存活率为30%。结论对于移植后新发肿瘤患者,宜采取外科手术与免疫抑制剂减量或换药相结合的个体化治疗方案。     

Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders Following Liver Transplantation: Incidence, Risk Factors and Survival

This study investigates retrospectively the incidence, risk factors and mortality of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) in adult orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. Among 1206 OLT recipients at a single institution, 37 developed a PTLD. The incidence of PTLD was highest during the first 18 months and relatively constant thereafter with cumulative incidence of 1.1% at 18 months and 4.7% at 15 years. The risk of PTLD was approximately 10% to 15% of the risk of death without PTLD. During the first 4 years following OLT, PTLD were predominantly related to EBV, while afterward most PTLD were EBV negative. Significant risk factors for PTLD in OLT recipients were transplantation for acute fulminant hepatitis during the first 18 months following OLT (HR = 2.6, p = 0.007), and rejection therapy with high-dose steroids (HR = 4.5, p = 0.049) and OKT3 (HR = 3.9, p = 0.016) during the previous year. Therapy with high-dose steroids or OKT3 (HR = 3.6, p = 0.0071) were also significant risk factors for PTLD-associated mortality. OLT recipients remain at risk for PTLD years after transplantation. The strong association of PTLD with rejection therapy and the worse post-PTLD prognosis among recipients of rejection therapy indicate the need to balance the risk of immunosuppression against the risk of PTLD following rejection treatment.     

Risk factors for impaired wound healing in sirolimus-treated renal transplant recipients

AIM: As sirolimus has been implicated in impaired wound healing, the aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for wound complications after renal transplantation in patients treated with this drug de novo. METHODS: This single center retrospective review of wound complications included 194 renal transplant recipients, all of whom received sirolimus immunosuppression in combination with reduced doses of cyclosporine (CsA) and corticosteroids de novo. A wound complication was defined as an infection, incisional hernia, or lymphocele. RESULTS: The overall incidence of wound complications within the first year post-transplantation was 36% (n = 70) including infection in 12% (n = 23), lymphocele formation in 18% (n = 34), and incisional hernia in 18% (n = 34) of patients. Seventeen patients suffered more than one wound complication. A multivariate analysis showed that independent risk factors for the development of wound complications were recipients over the age of 40 yr (odds ratio 2.536, p = 0.011), subjects with body mass index (BMI) >26 (odds ratio 2.498, p = 0.027) and especially BMI >30 (odds ratio 3.738, p = 0.007), the use of thymoglobulin for induction immunosuppression (odds ratio 3.627, p = 0.002), and a cumulative dose of sirolimus of at least 35 mg by post-transplant day 4 (odds ratio 2.694, p = 0.023). African-American (odds ratio 0.139, p < 0.001) or Hispanic recipients (odds ratio 0.337, p = 0.014) were less likely to experience a wound problem than Caucasian recipients. CONCLUSION: A number of potentially modifiable risk factors independently increase the incidence of wound complications among renal transplant recipients receiving sirolimus-based immunosuppression de novo.     

De Novo Internal Neoplasms after Liver Transplantation: Increased Risk and Aggressive Behavior in Recent Years?

The goal of the study was to determine the incidence and variables associated with post-liver transplantation (LT) de novo internal neoplasms development, excluding skin tumors and hepatocellular carcinoma. Medical records were reviewed for recipient/donor demographics, viral serology, cause of liver disease, interval from LT to tumor diagnosis, predisposing factors, immunosuppression and survival. Forty-one neoplasms (31 solid and 10 hematologic) developed in 772 recipients (5.3%) transplanted between 1991 and 2001. Time to tumor diagnosis was longer in patients transplanted before 1995 than in those transplanted afterwards (58 vs. 22 months; p<0.05). Hematologic neoplasms (HN) appeared earlier than solid (2 vs. 21 months; p<0.001), were more prevalent in those transplanted after 1995 than before (32% vs. 12.5%), and had lower survival than solid (2 vs. 21 months, p<0.001). While HCV was the most frequent indication in HN (70%), alcohol was that of solid tumors (71%). Overall, risk factors for de novo neoplasms included alcohol and immunosuppression (p<0.01). In patients undergoing LT in recent years, there is a higher incidence of HN with de novo internal neoplasms developing at earlier time-points than in those transplanted years ago. Risk factors for tumor development include alcohol, HCV and possibly strong immunosuppression.     

Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder Following Pancreas Transplantation

The incidence, risk factors and impact on patient and graft survival were evaluated for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) among 212 pancreas transplant recipients. Thirteen (6.1%) developed PTLD during 71 ± 27 months follow-up. Cumulative incidences of PTLD at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years posttransplant were 4.2%, 5.3%, 6.0% and 7.0%, respectively. Incidence of PTLD was lower for recipients of simultaneous pancreas kidney compared to pancreas after kidney transplant or pancreas transplant alone, though not significantly so. Recipient Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) seronegativity and number of doses of depleting antibody therapy administered at transplant were associated with increased risk of PTLD, while recipient age, gender, transplant type, cytomegalovirus mismatch maintenance immunosuppression type and treated acute rejection were not. All 13 cases underwent immunosuppression reduction, and 10 received anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. During follow-up, 10/13 (77%) responded to treatment with complete remission, while 3 (23%) died as a result of PTLD. Patient and graft survivals did not differ for recipients with and without PTLD. The strong association of PTLD with EBV-seronegativity requires considering this risk factor when evaluating and monitoring pancreas transplant recipients. With reduction of immunosuppression and anti-CD20 therapy, survival for pancreas transplant recipients with PTLD was substantially better than previously reported.     

Evidence of differential risk for posttransplantation malignancy based on pretransplantation cause in patients undergoing liver transplantation

Organ transplant recipients are considered to be at greater risk for developing malignancy because of the prolonged immunosuppression associated with organ grafting. The purpose of this study is to determine risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of de novo nonlymphoid malignancies after liver transplantation from a large single-center series. All patients undergoing liver transplantation at the King's College Hospital (London, UK) between January 1988 and December 1999 were analyzed retrospectively for the development of de novo malignancy in the posttransplantation period. Records were evaluated for age at diagnosis of malignancy, cause of liver disease, interval from transplantation to diagnosis of malignancy, predisposing factors for the development of cancer, immunosuppression regimen, treatment of malignancy, rejection episodes, and patient survival. Of 1,140 patients undergoing 1,271 liver transplantations, 30 patients (2.6%) developed de novo nonlymphoid malignancy after transplantation. Skin cancers were the most common (n = 13), followed by oropharyngeal carcinoma (n = 2), bladder carcinoma (n = 2), acute leukemia (n = 2), breast carcinoma (n = 2), and various other malignancies (n = 9). The mean time of presentation of the malignancy after transplantation was 45.1 ± 32 months (range, 6 to 133 months), and mean age at diagnosis of malignancy was 55 years (range, 34 to 71 years). The incidence of de novo malignancy was significantly greater in patients who underwent transplantation for alcoholic liver disease compared with other groups (P < .001). Although the incidence of de novo nonlymphoid malignancy after liver transplantation is low, patients who underwent transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis appear to have an increased risk for developing posttransplantation malignancy. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:482-487.)     

Sirolimus in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

Background and Aims

Liver transplantation (OLT) in children has seen significant improvements in recent years. Long-term immunosuppressive strategies have focused on avoiding the risks of long-term immunosuppression, particularly nephrotoxicity, de novo malignancy and late infections. Since its introduction in renal transplantation in 1999, sirolimus (SRL) has been used by an increasing number of liver transplant centers. The aim of this study was to review the experience using SRL in pediatric liver transplant recipients at a single center.

Methods

Between 1989 and 2006, 318 children underwent OLT including 13 who were converted to SRL therapy because of tacrolimus-related side effects. The indications were posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD; n = 11), nephrotoxicity (n = 1), and de novo autoimmune hepatitis (n = 1). One patient with PTLD previously concurrently displayed chronic rejection. SRL dosages ranged between 0.4 and 5 mg/d. The median duration of follow-up was 18 months.

Results

PTLD recurred in 1 patient. There were no episodes of acute rejection. One child developed hyperlipidemia that resolved with diet and medication.

Conclusions

Conversion from tacrolimus to SRL in selected pediatric liver transplant recipients is safe. Children with PTLD may benefit from immunosuppression with SRL after liver transplantation.     

De novo malignancies after intestinal and multivisceral transplantation

BACKGROUND: Maintenance immunosuppression required after organ transplantation creates a permissive environment in which cancer cells can proliferate because of lack of natural immunologic surveillance. With more than a decade of clinical experience, this report is the first to address the risk of de novo cancer after intestinal transplantation. METHODS: A total of 168 consecutive intestinal transplant recipients (86 children and 82 adults) were studied, of whom 52% were male and 91% were white. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data was used to count expected rates of de novo cancers in the general population matched for age, sex, and length of follow-up. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 47+/-41 months, 7 (4.2%) patients developed nonlymphoid de novo cancer, with a cumulative risk of 3% at 5 years and 28% at 10 years. Of these malignancies, one was donor-driven adenocarcinoma. With 0.58 being the expected rate of malignancy for the general population, the risk among intestinal recipients was 8.7 times higher (P =0.01). Such morbidity was significantly higher (50 times) among younger patients (<25 years), with a slight male preponderance. Induction immunosuppression was associated with early onset of de novo cancer. Patient survival after diagnosis of de novo cancer was 72% at 1 year, 57% at 2 years, and 29% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: With conventional immunosuppression, intestinal recipients are at a significantly higher risk of developing de novo cancer when compared with the general population. Thus, a novel tolerogenic immunosuppressive strategy has been recently implemented to reduce the lifelong need for immunosuppression.     

Early onset post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease is associated with allograft localization

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a major complication after solid organ transplantation. We analyzed incidence, patient characteristics, clinical presentation, and prognostic factors for treatment outcome and survival of PTLD patients transplanted at our center. Records from adult kidney and lung transplant recipients, transplanted between January 1985 and December 2002 with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of PTLD, were retrieved. Histology was reviewed and prognostic factors for treatment outcome were evaluated by multivariable analysis. Of 1354 kidney and 206 lung transplants, PTLD was diagnosed in 40 transplant recipients (2.6%). Lung transplant recipients had a significantly higher incidence of PTLD (8.3%) than kidney transplant recipients (1.7%). Sites of presentation were highly heterogeneous. Notably, PTLD localized in the allograft occurred significantly earlier after transplantation than PTLD localized outside the allograft (p = 0.001). This was true for lung (p = 0.006) as well as for kidney transplant recipients (p = 0.03). In multivariable Cox regression, performance status (p = 0.01) and advanced stage (p = 0.04) were factors negatively predictive for response to first-line treatment. Only performance status remained as negative predictive factor for survival (p = 0.002) and freedom from tumor progression (p = 0.01). In conclusion, the allograft is significantly more often involved as primary site of PTLD presentation during the first post-transplant year. This may have clinical consequences and give new insights in pathogenesis of PTLD. Performance status and stage are important risk factors for outcome of PTLD.     

A Phase III Study of Belatacept Versus Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplants from Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT‐EXT Study)

Recipients of extended criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are at increased risk for graft dysfunction/loss, and may benefit from immunosuppression that avoids calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. Belatacept, a selective costimulation blocker, may preserve renal function and improve long‐term outcomes versus CNIs. BENEFIT‐EXT (Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First‐line Immunosuppression Trial—EXTended criteria donors) is a 3‐year, Phase III study that assessed a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept versus cyclosporine in adult ECD kidney transplant recipients. The coprimary endpoints at 12 months were composite patient/graft survival and a composite renal impairment endpoint. Patient/graft survival with belatacept was similar to cyclosporine (86% MI, 89% LI, 85% cyclosporine) at 12 months. Fewer belatacept patients reached the composite renal impairment endpoint versus cyclosporine (71% MI, 77% LI, 85% cyclosporine; p = 0.002 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.06 LI vs. cyclosporine). The mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 4–7 mL/min higher on belatacept versus cyclosporine (p = 0.008 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.1039 LI vs. cyclosporine), and the overall cardiovascular/metabolic profile was better on belatacept versus cyclosporine. The incidence of acute rejection was similar across groups (18% MI; 18% LI; 14% cyclosporine). Overall rates of infection and malignancy were similar between groups; however, more cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurred in the CNS on belatacept. ECD kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept‐based immunosuppression achieved similar patient/graft survival, better renal function, had an increased incidence of PTLD, and exhibited improvement in the cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile versus cyclosporine‐treated patients.     

Urological malignancy after renal transplantation

Immunosuppression in solid-organ recipients is associated with a greater risk of de novo malignancy after transplantation; herein we report the UK transplant registry (UKTR) database of urological cancer after renal transplantation in the UK transplant population. From September 1999 to January 2006 there were 10,847 kidney recipients with at least one period of follow-up reported after a kidney transplant (mean age at transplantation 42.4 years, sd 15.5; 6685 male, 61.6%, and 4162 female, 38.3%). The recipients represent a homogenous group who received different immunosuppression regimens. Skin cancer was excluded from the study. Unfortunately, the UKTR does not collect information about the presence or absence of cancer, either at registration onto the transplant waiting list or at transplantation. In all, 214 (1.9%) patients were reported to have a subsequent urological malignancy diagnosed among the 10,847 recipients. The UKTR was used to identify patients who developed urological malignancies after renal transplantation, which is a challenging event after solid-organ transplantation. Regular surveillance to diagnose early occurrence and adjustment of immunosuppression might be beneficial. In the presence of metastatic disease, chemotherapy treatment with adjustment or cessation of immunosuppressive therapy is required.