Modified spleen stiffness measurement by transient elastography is associated with presence of large oesophageal varices in patients with compensated hepatitis C virus cirrhosis

To evaluate the accuracy of liver transient elastography (TE), spleen TE and other noninvasive tests (AAR, APRI score, platelet count, platelet/spleen ratio) in predicting the presence and the size of oesophageal varices in compensated hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis, we studied 112 consecutive patients with compensated HCV cirrhosis who underwent biochemical tests, gastrointestinal endoscopy, liver TE and spleen TE by Fibroscan^® (Echosens, Paris, France) using a modified software version with a range between 1.5 and 150 kPa. Spleen TE was not reliable in 16 patients (14.3%). Among the 96 patients with a valid measurement (69.8% men, mean age: 63.2 ± 9.5 years), 43.7% had no oesophageal varices, 29.2% had grade 1% and 27.1% had grade 2 or grade 3 oesophageal varices. Patients with values of 75 kPa by standard spleen TE had mean values of modified spleen TE of 117 kPa (range: 81.7–149.5). Linear regression revealed a significant correlation between modified spleen TE and oesophageal varix size (r = 0.501; beta: 0.763, SE: 0.144; P < 0.001). On univariate analysis, the variables associated with grade 2/grade 3 oesophageal varices were AAR score, APRI score, platelet/spleen ratio, liver TE and modified spleen TE. On multivariate analysis, only modified spleen TE (OR: 1.026; 95% CI: 1.007–1.046; P = 0.006) and AAR (OR: 14.725; 95% CI: 1.928–112.459; P = 0.010) remained independently associated with grade 2/grade 3 oesophageal varices. Platelet/spleen ratio was the best predictor of oesophageal varices area under the ROC curve (AUROC: 0.763, cut‐off: 800, sensitivity: 74%, specificity: 70%), while modified spleen TE was more accurate in predicting grade 2/grade 3 oesophageal varices (AUROC: 0.82, cut‐off: 54.0 kPa, sensitivity: 80%, specificity: 70%). Portal hypertension increases spleen stiffness, and the measurement of modified spleen TE is an accurate, noninvasive tool for predicting the presence of large oesophageal varices in patients with compensated HCV cirrhosis.     

Value of transient elastography for the prediction of variceal bleeding

AIM:To determine if liver stiffness(LS) measurements by means of transient elastography(TE) correlate with the presence of significant esophageal varices(EV) and if they can predict the occurrence of variceal bleeding.METHODS:We studied 1000 cases of liver cirrhosis divided into 2 groups:patients without EV or with grade 1 varices(647 cases) and patients with significant varices(grade 2 and 3 EV)(353 cases).We divided the group of 540 cases with EV into another 2 subgroups:without variceal hemorrhage(375 pa...     

Is transient elastography a useful tool for screening liver disease？

Transient elastography （TE） is a new non invasive tool for measuring liver stiffness, which is correlated to the histologic stage of liver fibrosis. Several studies in chronic liver disease （CLD） have determined a good accuracy of TE in predicting significant fibrosis and an optimal accuracy in predicting cirrhosis. Normal liver stiffness ranges between 3.3-7.8 KPa and using a cut off of 7.1 KPa, significant fibrosis and cirrhosis can be excluded with a very high negative predictive value （NPV）. Positive predictive value （PPV） for the diagnosis of cirrhosis is lower using just a single scan but increases to 90% if high stiffness values are confirmed by a second independent scan. However the presence of fatty liver and metabolic syndrome slightly increases the readings and may reduce the accuracy of the test. it is uncertain if this increase is related to the presence of steatofibrosis or if it is caused by steatosis itself. TE can be used in screening patients attending the liver clinics to identify those with significant fibrosis or cirrhosis and may be particularly useful in discriminating HBV inactive carriers from chronic hepatitis B patients. TE, however, is not reliable in predicting the presence of esophageal varices in cirrhotics. Another potential indication for TE is the systematic screening of populations at high risk for CLD, such as intravenous drug users and alcoholics, but further studies are needed to determine its diagnostic accuracy in these settings.     

藏族肝硬化患者临床特征分析*

目的 调查藏族肝硬化患者病因、肝脏和脾脏硬度值的变化及其食管胃底静脉曲张发生情况。方法 选择270例藏族肝硬化患者,采用ELISA法检测血清HBV和HCV标记物,使用Fibroscan检测肝硬度,使用GVE-2600X电子胃镜检查静脉曲张,使用迈瑞DC-3彩色多普勒超声诊断仪检查辅助诊断。结果 在270例肝硬化患者中,经胃镜检查发现食管和胃底静脉曲张192例（71.1%）,曲张的静脉呈瘤状、结节状或串珠状,沿食管的中段向贲门延伸,最远处延伸至胃底。伴有红色征象106例（39.3%）;本组乙型肝炎肝硬化141例,丙型肝炎肝硬化29例,原发性胆汁性肝硬化39例,酒精性肝硬化37例,自身免疫性肝炎肝硬化24例。不同病因肝硬化患者肝脏和脾脏硬度值比较均无统计学差异（P>0.05）;96例Child-Pugh C级肝硬化患者肝脏和脾脏硬度值明显大于68例B级（P<0.05）或106例Child-Pugh A级患者（P<0.05）;食管和胃底静脉曲张程度与肝纤维化程度呈直线相关（r=0.8539,P=0.0001）;肝硬化患者脾脏弹性值为（41.2±19.3） kPa,肝脏弹性值为（23.5±15.0） kPa,两者之间呈正相关（r=0.8539,P=0.0001）。结论 本组资料显示,藏族肝硬化的病因与我国其他民族人群无太大的区别,肝硬化患者肝脏和脾脏硬度值随Child-Pugh分级程度的加重而增大。肝纤维化程度与食管胃底静脉曲张程度呈正相关,肝纤维化越重,食管胃底静脉曲张程度越重,故重度肝纤维化患者食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的风险越大。     

Elastography methods for the non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension

Introduction: The gold standard to assess the presence and severity of portal hypertension remains the hepatic vein pressure gradient, however the recent development of non-invasive assessment using elastography techniques offers valuable alternatives. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic accuracy and utility of such techniques in patients with portal hypertension due to cirrhosis.

Areas covered: A literature search focused on liver and spleen stiffness measurement with different elastographic techniques for the assessment of the presence and severity of portal hypertension and oesophageal varices in people with chronic liver disease. The combination of elastography with parameters such as platelet count and spleen size is also discussed.

Expert commentary: Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis and portal hypertension is a validated tool for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients. Baveno VI recommended the combination of transient elastography and platelet count for ruling out varices needing treatment in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease. Assessment of aetiology specific cut-offs for ruling in and ruling out clinically significant portal hypertension is an unmet clinical need. The incorporation of spleen stiffness measurements in non-invasive algorithms using validated software and improved measuring scales might enhance the non-invasive diagnosis of portal hypertension in the next 5 years.     

Diagnostic accuracy of liver and spleen stiffness measured by fibroscan® in the prediction of esophageal varices in HCV-related cirrhosis patients treated with oral antivirals

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of liver and spleen stiffness measurement by transient elastography for the prediction of gastroesophageal varices in patients with HCV-associated cirrhosis treated with new direct-acting antiviral agents.Patients and methodsThis cross-sectional observational study included patients with compensated HCV-related cirrhosis and sustained virological response after direct-acting antiviral therapy. Patients underwent liver and spleen stiffness measurement, abdominal ultrasound and oesophago-gastroduodenoscopy. Clinical and laboratory data and non-invasive markers such as the liver stiffness–spleen diameter to platelet ratio score, variceal risk index and platelet count to spleen diameter ratio were analyzed.ResultsNinety-seven consecutive patients were included. Liver stiffness measurement (12.2 vs 16; p = 0.02), spleen stiffness measurement (39.4 vs 46.05; p = 0.04), liver stiffness–spleen diameter to platelet ratio score (1.21 vs 2.02; p = 0.008), platelet count to spleen diameter ratio (1102.19 vs 829.7; p = 0.04) and variceal risk index (?3.4 vs ?1.02; p = 0.01) showed significant differences between patients without/with gastroesophageal varices. The best cut-off value to discard the presence of gastroesophageal varices was 12.3 kPa for liver stiffness measurement and 27 kPa for spleen stiffness measurement. However, diagnostic accuracy was moderate (AUROC: 0.671 and 0.624 respectively). Combining different non-invasive parameters did not significantly improve the overall performance.DiscussionLiver and spleen stiffness measurement showed suboptimal results for non-invasive assessment of gastroesophageal varices in HCV cirrhotic patients treated with direct-acting antiviral agents. Our results suggest that non-invasive methods cannot substitute standard procedures for predicting gastroesophageal varices in this population.     

Use of the Platelet Count/Spleen Diameter Ratio for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Esophageal Varices in Patients with Schistosomiasis

Background/Aim:

In patients with liver cirrhosis, the platelet count/spleen diameter ratio has been validated as a parameter for the noninvasive diagnosis of esophageal varices. Schistosoma infection is a frequent cause of portal hypertension in Middle Eastern countries, and is associated with the development of esophageal varices. In this study we aimed to evaluate the platelet count/spleen diameter ratio as a noninvasive tool for the prediction of the presence of esophageal varices in patients with schistosoma-related chronic liver disease.

Patients and Methods:

Forty-three patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis underwent upper digestive endoscopy to check for the presence of esophageal varices. Furthermore, all patients underwent abdominal ultrasonography, and maximum spleen diameter (in mm) was measured. The platelet count/spleen diameter ratio was calculated in all patients.

Results:

Esophageal varices were found in 31 patients (72%). Age and gender were not significantly different between patients with and without varices. In patients with varices, median platelet count (82,000/μL versus 172,000/μL, P < 0.0001) and platelet count/spleen diameter ratio (571 versus 1651, P < 0.0001) were significantly lower, while spleen diameter (147 mm versus 109 mm, P = 0.0006) was significantly larger. In multivariate analysis, the platelet count/spleen diameter ratio was the only parameter independently associated with the presence of varices (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions:

In this study we have validated the use of the platelet count/spleen diameter ratio for the noninvasive diagnosis of esophageal varices in patients with portal hypertension caused by schistosoma infection. In these patients, the platelet count/spleen diameter ratio might be used to allow better rationalization of medical resources and use of endoscopy.     

Comparison of transient elastography,serum markers and clinical signs for the diagnosis of compensated cirrhosis

Background and Aims: Non‐invasive diagnosis of compensated cirrhosis is important. We therefore compared liver stiffness by transient elastography, APRI score, AST/ALT ratio, hyaluronic acid and clinical signs to determine which modality performed best at identifying compensated cirrhosis. Methods: Patients undergoing evaluation at a single center were recruited and had clinical, serological, endoscopy, radiological imaging, liver stiffness measurement and liver biopsy. Patients were stratified into cirrhotic and non‐cirrhotic. Results: In 404 patients (124 cirrhosis), transient elastography was diagnostically superior to the other modalities yielding an AUC 0.9 ± 0.04 compared with hyaluronic acid (AUC 0.81 ± 0.04: P < 0.05), clinical signs (AUC 0.74 ± 0.04: P < 0.05), APRI score (AUC 0.71 ± 0.03: P < 0.05) and AST/ALT ratio (AUC 0.66 ± 0.03: P < 0.05). The optimum cut‐off for transient elastography was 12 kPa giving a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 87% for cirrhosis. In 238 hepatitis C patients (87 cirrhosis), transient elastography yielded an AUC 0.899 ± 0.02 for cirrhosis and in 166 non‐HCV patients (37 cirrhosis) the results were similar with an AUC 0.928 ± 0.03; with transient elastography being superior to HA, APRI, AST/ALT and clinical signs for all etiologies of cirrhosis (P < 0.05 for all). Importantly, transient elastography was statistically superior at identifying cirrhosis in 38 biopsy proven Childs Pugh A cirrhotics with no clinical, biochemical or radiological features of cirrhosis or portal hypertension (AUC 0.87 ± 0.04). Conclusion: Transient elastography accurately identified compensated cirrhosis; a liver stiffness of >12 kPa represents an important clinical measurement for the diagnosis of cirrhosis.     

Liver stiffness measurement selects patients with cirrhosis at risk of bearing large oesophageal varices

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Periodic endoscopic screening for oesophageal varices is recommended in patients with cirrhosis, but might be limited to a subgroup of patients if a simple non-invasive test was available to select those at risk of bleeding. METHODS: We studied in 165 patients with cirrhosis the relation between the presence of oesophageal varices assessed by endoscopy, and liver stiffness measurement by Fibroscan, a non-invasive parameter related to liver fibrosis. The results were compared to those of other parameters reflecting portal hypertension, splenic size, platelet count, and platelet count/spleen size ratio. RESULTS: Liver stiffness measurement was correlated to the grade of oesophageal varices (r = 0.6, p < 0.0001). AUROC values of liver stiffness measurement were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78-0.90) for the presence of oesophageal varices and 0.83 (0.76-0.89) for varices grade > or = II. Liver stiffness measurement value < 19 kPa was highly predictive of the absence of oesophageal varices grade > or = II (Se: 84%, PPV: 47%, NPV: 93%). CONCLUSIONS: Liver stiffness measurement allows to predict the presence of large oesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis, and may help to select patients for endoscopic screening.     

Endoscopic Evaluation of Rectal Mucosal Reddening in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

Background: Colonic mucosal lesions observed in patients with portal hypertension have been reported as portal hypertensive colopathy. We studied the rectal mucosa in patients with liver cirrhosis to evaluate the prevalence of mucosal reddening which looks like gastric red spots in the portal hypertensive gastropathy and to determine whether there is a correlation between this lesion and portal hypertension or the severity of liver disease. Methods: Seventy‐two patients with liver cirrhosis and 50 control subjects were examined. Colonoscopy was performed to evaluate the presence of mucosal reddening in the rectum. We investigated the relations between rectal mucosal reddening and esophageal varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy and the severity of liver cirrhosis. Results: Rectal mucosal reddening was observed in eight of 72 patients with liver cirrhosis but in none of the 50 control subjects; its prevalence in cirrhosis patients was significantly higher than that in the control subjects (P < 0.05). Cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices were more likely to have rectal mucosal reddening than cirrhosis patients without esophageal varices (P < 0.05). In addition, the occurrence of rectal mucosal reddening correlated with the severity of cirrhosis, based on Child–Pugh's classification (P < 0.05). Conclusion: We have shown that rectal mucosal reddening develops in patients with liver cirrhosis and is associated with the existence of esophageal varices and the severity of liver cirrhosis. These results suggest the possibility that portal hypertension and impaired liver function may play an important role in the pathogenesis of rectal mucosal reddening in patients with cirrhosis.     

Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B

The goal of this review is to provide a comprehensive picture of the role, clinical applications and future perspectives of the most widely used non-invasive techniques for the evaluation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. During the past decade many non-invasive methods have been developed to reduce the need for liver biopsy in staging fibrosis and to overcome whenever possible its limitations, mainly: invasiveness, costs, low reproducibility, poor acceptance by patients. Elastographic techniques conceived to assess liver stiffness, in particular transient elastography, and the most commonly used biological markers will be assessed against their respective role and limitations in staging hepatic fibrosis. Recent evidence highlights that both liver stiffness and some bio-chemical markers correlate with survival and major clinical end-points such as liver decompensation, development of hepatocellular carcinoma and portal hypertension. Thus the non-invasive techniques here discussed can play a major role in the management of patients with chronic HBV-related hepatitis. Given their prognostic value, transient elastography and some bio-chemical markers can be used to better categorize patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis and assign them to different classes of risk for clinically relevant outcomes. Very recent data indicates that the combined measurements of liver and spleen stiffness enable the reliable prediction of portal hypertension and esophageal varices development.     

Platelet count combined with right liver volume and spleen volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging for identifying cirrhosis and esophageal varices

AIM: To determine whether the combination of platelet count(PLT) with spleen volume parameters and right liver volume(RV) measured by magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) could predict the Child-Pugh class of liver cirrhosis and esophageal varices(EV).METHODS: Two hundred and five cirrhotic patients with hepatitis B and 40 healthy volunteers underwent abdominal triphasic-enhancement MRI and laboratory examination of PLT in 109/L. Cirrhotic patients underwent endoscopy for detecting EV. Spleen maximal width(W), thickness(T) and length(L) in mm together with spleen volume(SV) and RV in mm3 were measured by MRI, and spleen volume index(SI) in mm3 was obtained by W × T × L. SV/PLT, SI/PLT and RV × PLT/SV(RVPS) were calculated and statistically analyzed to assess cirrhosis and EV.RESULTS: SV/PLT(r = 0.676) and SI/PLT(r = 0.707) increased, and PLT(r =-0.626) and RVPS(r =-0.802) decreased with the progress of Child-Pugh class(P 0.001 for all). All parameters could determine the presence of cirrhosis, distinguish between each class of Child-Pugh class, and identify the presence of EV [the areas under the curve(AUCs) = 0.661-0.973]. A m o n g p a ra m e t e r s, R V P S c o u l d b e s t d e t e r m i n e presence and each class of cirrhosis with AUCs of 0.973 and 0.740-0.853, respectively; and SV/PLT could best identify EV with an AUC of 0.782.CONCLUSION: The combination of PLT with SV and RV could predict Child-Pugh class of liver cirrhosis and identify the presence of esophageal varices.     

Efficacy of transient elastography in screening for large esophageal varices in patients with suspicious or proven liver cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using transient elastography (TE) to predict the risk of esophageal varices (EVs) in Chinese patients. METHODS: In total, 46 patients with suspicious or proven liver cirrhosis underwent TE and liver biopsy. All participants were endoscopically screened for the presence of EVs and large EVs by two endoscopists who were blinded to the LSM status. Large EVs were defined as more than 5 mm in diameter. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for both TE and the platelet count/spleen diameter (PC/SD) ratio in predicting the presence of EVs or large EVs were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 46 patients, 30 (65%) had EVs including 19 (41%) with large EVs. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of LSM was 0.85 for the presence of EVs and 0.83 for large EVs, respectively. The cut‐off values of LSM were ≥13.4 kPa for the presence of EVs and ≥14.6 kPa for large EVs. Notably, the AUROC of the PC/SD ratio was 0.92 for the presence of EVs but only 0.69 for large EVs. CONCLUSION: LSM using TE can predict the presence of EVs or large EVs in Chinese patients with suspicious or proven cirrhosis and may identify patients who require endoscopic surveillance.     

Performance and utility of transient elastography and noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis in primary biliary cirrhosis

Background

The performance of transient elastography in primary biliary cirrhosis has yet to be fully established.

Aim

To assess: (1) the performance of transient elastography in identifying significant fibrosis in primary biliary cirrhosis by comparison with surrogate markers (AST platelet ratio index (APRI), FIB-4, Fibroindex, Forns, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio); (2) the correlation between liver stiffness and Mayo score prognostic index.

Methods

One hundred and twenty patients with primary biliary cirrhosis were consecutively enrolled. The performance of each marker and of liver stiffness was compared with histological staging and METAVIR at time of liver biopsy.

Results

The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of liver stiffness were 0.87, 0.88, 0.99 for histological stage ≥II, ≥III and =IV and 0.89, 0.92, 0.99 for METAVIR ≥2, ≥3 and =4. Transient elastography alone proved better able in identifying any grade of fibrosis or cirrhosis than noninvasive markers. Combining each surrogate marker with transient elastography did not improve the area under ROC. Transient elastography correlated positively with the Mayo score (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that transient elastography was associated with an advanced fibrosis (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Transient elastography proved a simple, reliable and useful method for assessing liver fibrosis in primary biliary cirrhosis, whereas noninvasive surrogate markers proved unsatisfactory in predicting significant fibrosis.     

Is transient elastography valuable for high‐risk esophageal varices prediction in patients with hepatitis‐B‐related cirrhosis?

Background and Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of transient elastography (TE) for high‐risk esophageal varices (HREV) prediction in hepatitis‐B‐related cirrhosis patients. Methods: A total of 238 patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis were prospectively enrolled. All patients had undergone TE and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Diagnostic value was assessed by the area under ROC curve (AUROC), predictive value and likelihood ratio. Results: The size of esophageal varices correlated with liver stiffness with Kendall's tau_b 0.236 overall and 0.425 in patients with ALT ≥ 5 × upper limit of normal (ULN). The AUROC of TE predicting HREV was 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.66–0.80) overall and 0.92 (0.82–1.01) for patients with ALT ≥ 5 × ULN. In patients with ALT ≥ 5 × ULN, cut‐off 36.1 kPa predicted HREV with a 100% negative predictive value (NPV), an indefinite negative likelihood ratio (NLR), a 72.7% positive predictive value (PPV) and a positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of 9.3. The AUROC of HREV‐predicting model, constructed by ultrasonography and TE (USLS), was 0.84 (0.77–0.90) in the training set and 0.85 (0.76–0.94) in the validating set. Cut‐off 3.30 excluded HREV with NPV 0.946 and NLR 0.10, and cut‐off 5.98 determined HREV with PPV 0.870 and PLR 10.24. Using USLS, nearly 50% of patients could avoid endoscopic screening. The model's predictive values were maintained at similar accuracy in the validation set. Differences of AUROC in USLS, liver stiffness/spleen diameter to platelet ratio score and ultrasonic score were not significant. Conclusions: TE may predict HREV in patients with ALT ≥ 5 × ULN. Overall, the clinical values of TE and USLS for HREV prediction should be evaluated by further studies.     

Liver stiffness measured by transient elastography is a predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma development in viral hepatitis

Aim: To investigate the value of liver stiffness in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among patients with viral hepatitis, and to prospectively investigate relationships between liver stiffness and HCC development. Methods: Liver stiffness was measured by transient elastography for 157 patients with viral hepatitis, along with various other parameters potentially associated with HCC. HCC was initially present in 41 patients and absent in 116 patients, of whom 106 patients were followed prospectively for HCC development. Diagnostic performances of liver stiffness and other clinical parameters in predicting presence of HCC were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curve (AUROC). Results: Liver stiffness was significantly higher in patients with HCC (24.9 ± 19.5 kPa) than in patients without HCC (10.9 ± 8.4 kPa; P < 0.0001). Age (P < 0.0001), platelet cell count (P = 0.0001), prothrombin activity (P = 0.0009), alpha fetoprotein (P = 0.0091), and des‐gamma‐carboxy prothrombin (DCP) (P = 0.0099) also differed significantly between patients with and without HCC. The largest AUROC was for liver stiffness. Differences between liver stiffness and age, platelet cell count, prothrombin activity, and DCP were not significant, but the AUROC of liver stiffness was superior to that of alpha fetoprotein (P = 0.03850). Using a cut‐off liver stiffness of 12.5 kPa, development of HCC was identified in 10 of the 106 patients followed. Multivariate analysis identified liver stiffness ≥12.5 kPa, age ≥60 years, and serum total bilirubin ≥1.0 mg/dL as significantly correlated with development of HCC. Conclusions: Liver stiffness as measured by transient elastography is a predictor of HCC development in viral hepatitis.     

Impact of liver steatosis on the correlation between liver stiffness and fibrosis measured by transient elastography in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus

Summary. We assessed the effect of different hepatic conditions such as fibrosis, steatosis and necroinflammatory activity on liver stiffness as measured by transient elastography in HIV/HCV‐coinfected patients. We studied all consecutive HIV/HCV‐coinfected patients who underwent liver biopsy and elastography between January 2007 and December 2008. Liver fibrosis was staged following METAVIR Cooperative Study Group criteria. Steatosis was categorized according to the percentage of affected hepatocytes as low (≤10%), moderate (<25%) and severe (≥25%). A total of 110 patients were included. Fibrosis was distributed by stage as follows: F0, n = 13; F1, n = 47; F2, n = 29; F3, n = 18; and F4, n = 3. Liver biopsy revealed the presence of hepatic steatosis in 68 patients (low to moderate, n = 53; and severe n = 15). By univariate regression analysis, fibrosis, necroinflammatory activity, and the degree of steatosis were correlated with liver stiffness. However, in a multiple regression analysis, steatosis and fibrosis were the only independent variables significantly associated with liver stiffness. With a cut‐off of 9.5 kPa to distinguish patients with F ≤ 2 from F ≥ 3, elastography led to a significantly higher number of misclassification errors (25%vs 5%; P = 0.014), most of which were false positives for F ≥ 3. Our study suggests that the correlation between liver stiffness and fibrosis as estimated by transient elastography may be affected by the presence of hepatic steatosis in HIV/HCV‐coinfected patients.     

瞬时弹性成像技术在慢性乙型肝炎中的应用进展

肝活检是诊断肝脏疾病的金标准,胃镜是诊断食管胃静脉曲张的金标准;但二者均为有创检查,因此应用受限。近年来瞬时弹性成像技术作为无创检测,临床已经广泛采用。介绍了瞬时弹性成像技术在慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化、肝脂肪变、肝硬化及肝癌等方面的最新进展。未来可在乙型肝炎肝硬化和肝癌早期联合诊疗方面进行更多研究。     

Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis via spleen stiffness measurement using acoustic radiation force impulse sonoelastography in patients with chronic hepatitis B or C

Summary. Portal hypertension and splenomegaly are common in patients with cirrhosis. However, there is limited previous in vivo research on the correlation between spleen stiffness and stages of liver fibrosis. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of spleen stiffness measurement (SSM), using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology, for liver fibrosis assessment. Eligible patients with chronic hepatitis B or C (n = 163) underwent concurrent liver stiffness measurement (LSM), SSM and percutaneous liver biopsy. Receiver operating characteristic curves estimated the diagnostic performance of SSM, with multiple linear regression models for LSM and SSM determining the significance of explanatory factors. Results indicated significant correlation between LSM and SSM (R² = 0.574, P < 0.0001). Using SSM to classify METAVIR fibrosis (METAVIR F) scores, the areas under curves were 0.839 (95% CI: 0.780–0.898) for METAVIR F1 vs F2–4, 0.936 (95% CI: 0.898–0.975) for F1–2 vs F3–4 and 0.932 (95% CI: 0.893–0.971) for F1–3 vs F4, all P < 0.001. Multiple linear regression models identified BMI, spleen stiffness, METAVIR F3 and F4, serum alanine aminotransferase, international normalized ratio of prothrombin time, sodium and platelet count as significant independent explanatory factors for liver stiffness (adjusted R² = 0.724, P < 0.001). Male gender, liver stiffness, METAVIR F2, F3 and F4 also significantly and independently explained spleen stiffness (adjusted R² = 0.647, P < 0.001). ARFI SSM is potentially useful as a single or adjunct predictor of stages of liver fibrosis.     

Screening for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients – Non-invasive methods

Variceal bleeding is a dramatic complication of cirrhosis. Primary prophylaxis against variceal bleeding is indicated for patients with high-risk varices. In order for these patients to be identified, endoscopic screening for esophageal varices has been traditionally recommended at the time of the diagnosis of cirrhosis. Considering that many patients do not have esophageal varices in the early stages of cirrhosis and, therefore, are submitted to endoscopy unnecessarily, non-invasive methods for variceal screening have been studied. Among these non-invasive methods, the most extensively studied probably are platelet count/spleen diameter ratio, liver stiffness, spleen stiffness and an association between liver stiffness and platelet count, referred to as the Baveno VI criteria. The Baveno VI criteria has recently been recommended by different medical associations for variceal screening. This is a critical review on the non-invasive methods for variceal screening, in which the performances of the different methods are presented and the limitations of the existing evidence is discussed. Despite reasonable performances of some of these methods, especially platelet count/spleen diameter ratio and the association between liver stiffness and platelet count, we understand that the available evidence still has relevant limitations and that physicians should decide on screening cirrhotic patients for esophageal varices with endoscopy or non-invasive methods on a case-by-case basis.