Impaired small bowel gas propulsion in patients with bloating during intestinal lipid infusion

OBJECTIVE: In healthy individuals, intraluminal lipids delay intestinal gas clearance, and this reflex is exaggerated in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Our aim was to determine the site of action of abnormal lipid-induced reflexes in IBS. METHODS: In six patients with (IBS) predominantly complaining of bloating and in six healthy subjects, a mixture of gas (N2, O2, and CO2 in venous proportions to minimize diffusion) was infused (12 mL/min) either into the jejunum or into the ileum for 2 h, with simultaneous perfusion of lipids (0.5 kcal/min) into the proximal duodenum. Rectal gas evacuation was measured by a barostat. Abdominal perception (by a 0-6 scale) and girth changes were measured at 15-min intervals. The effects of jejunal versus ileal gas infusion were compared by paired tests in random order on separate days. RESULTS: IBS patients exhibited significant gas retention during infusion of gas into the jejunum (398 +/- 90 mL vs-210 +/- 105 mL in health, p < 0.05) but not during ileal infusion (-79 +/- 87 mL vs-79 +/- 78 mL in health, NS; p < 0.05 vs jejunal infusion). Gas retention during jejunal gas infusion in IBS patients was associated with significant abdominal distension (11 +/- 3 mm girth increment vs 0 +/- 1 mm during ileal gas infusion and 1 +/- 1 mm in health, p < 0.05 for both) and abdominal symptoms (3.6 +/- 0.6 score vs 2.6 +/- 0.7 score during ileal gas infusion and 1.6 +/- 0.5 score in health, p < 0.05 for both). CONCLUSIONS: In IBS patients intraluminal lipids impair intestinal gas clearance because of upregulated reflex inhibition of small bowel transit, without appreciable colonic effects.     

Prokinetic effects in patients with intestinal gas retention

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We have previously shown that patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have impaired transit of intestinal gas loads. Because abnormal gas retention can be experimentally reproduced in healthy subjects by pharmacological inhibition of gut motility, we hypothesized that impaired gas transit and retention can be reciprocally corrected by pharmacologically stimulating intestinal propulsion. METHODS: In 28 patients with abdominal bloating (14 IBS, 14 functional bloating) and in 14 healthy subjects, gas evacuation and perception of jejunal gas infusion (12 mL/min) were measured. After 2 hours, in 20 patients we tested the effect of intravenous neostigmine (0.5 mg) vs. intravenous saline administered blindly and randomly at a 1-hour interval. RESULTS: After 2 hours of gas infusion, patients with IBS and functional bloating alike exhibited significant gas retention (418 +/- 86 mL), abdominal symptoms (2.7 +/- 0.5 score), and objective distention (8 +/- 2 mm girth increment), in contrast to healthy controls, who experienced none (46 +/- 102 mL retention, 0.4 +/- 0.3 symptom score, and 3 +/- 1 mm distention; P < 0.05 for all). Neostigmine produced immediate clearance of gas retained within the gut (603 +/- 53 mL/30 minutes vs. 273 +/- 59 mL/30 minutes after saline; P < 0.05) and by 1 hour reduced gas retention (by 373 +/- 57 mL), abdominal symptoms (by 1.1 +/- 0.5 score), and distention (by 6 +/- 1 mm; P < 0.05 for all), whereas intravenous saline produced no effects. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with intestinal gas retention, pharmacological stimulation of intestinal propulsion improves gas transit, abdominal symptoms, and distention.     

Physical activity and intestinal gas clearance in patients with bloating

BACKGROUND: Patients complaining of abdominal bloating have impaired tolerance and clearance of intestinal gas loads. Mild exercise enhances intestinal clearance and prevents retention of intestinal gas loads in healthy subjects. Our aim was to evaluate the putative beneficial effects of physical activity in patients with abdominal bloating. METHODS: In eight patients complaining of bloating, seven with irritable bowel syndrome, and one with functional bloating, according to Rome II criteria, a gas mixture was continuously infused (12 mL/min) into the jejunum for 120 min with simultaneous duodenal lipid perfusion (1 kcal/min). Gas evacuation, perception (0-6 scale), and abdominal girth were measured at 15-min intervals. Paired studies were randomly performed in the supine position during intermittent pedaling (5 min with 3-min rest intervals at 40 rpm and 0.15 kp load) versus rest (as control). RESULTS: During rest, a significant proportion of the gas infused was retained in the gut (45 +/- 9%, P < 0.01 vs basal), but retention was significantly lower during exercise (24 +/- 7%, P < 0.05 vs rest). Gas retention during rest was associated with significant abdominal symptoms (3.6 score; P < 0.01 vs basal), and symptoms also improved during exercise (2.8 score, P < 0.05 vs rest). During the test, patients developed abdominal distension, which was related to the volume of gas retained (r = 0.68, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Mild physical activity enhances intestinal gas clearance and reduces symptoms in patients complaining of abdominal bloating.     

Lipid-induced intestinal gas retention in irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We hypothesized that lipids, which induce various motor and sensory effects on the gut, modulate intestinal gas dynamics and that alteration of this regulatory mechanism may result in impaired gas transit in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). METHODS: In 45 healthy subjects and 30 patients with IBS, evacuation of gas infused into the jejunum (at 12 mL/min) was measured for 2 hours. The effect of simultaneous duodenal perfusion of lipids at 0 kcal/min (saline), 0.5 kcal/min, and 1 kcal/min was tested in groups of 15 subjects each. RESULTS: In healthy subjects, duodenal lipids at 1 kcal/min but not at 0 kcal/min or 0.5 kcal/min produced significant gas retention (281 +/- 53 mL vs. 22 +/- 64 mL at 0 kcal/min and -65 +/- 72 mL at 0.5 kcal/min; P < 0.05 for both). Patients with IBS exhibited gas retention during saline perfusion (259 +/- 85 mL at 0 kcal/min; P < 0.05 vs. healthy subjects) and were hypersensitive to duodenal lipids (505 +/- 61 mL retention at 0.5 kcal/min; P < 0.05 vs. saline and vs. healthy subjects). The "gas plus lipids" challenge test discriminated patients with 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Physiologic concentrations of intestinal lipids exert an inhibitory control on intestinal gas transit, and this mechanism is up-regulated in patients with IBS. Hence, impaired gas propulsion, shown by the gas challenge test, may be useful as a diagnostic test if replicated in a larger series of patients.     

Impaired reflex control of intestinal gas transit in patients with abdominal bloating

BACKGROUND: Patients with abdominal bloating and distension exhibit impaired transit of intestinal gas which may lead to excessive gas retention and symptoms. Furthermore, we have previously shown that intestinal gas transit is normally accelerated by rectal distension. We hypothesise that in patients with functional bloating this modulatory mechanism fails and impairs gas transit. METHODS: In 12 healthy subjects and eight patients with abdominal bloating we compared, by paired studies, the effect of rectal versus sham distension on intestinal gas transit. Gas was infused into the jejunum (12 ml/min) for three hours with simultaneous perfusion of lipids into the duodenum (Intralipid 1 kcal/min) while measuring evacuation of gas per rectum. RESULTS: In healthy subjects, duodenal lipid infusion produced gas retention (409 (68) ml) which was prevented by rectal distension (90 (90) ml; p<0.05 v sham distension). In contrast, rectal distension in patients with abdominal bloating failed to reduce lipid induced gas retention (771 (217) ml retention during rectal distension v 730 (183) ml during sham distension; NS; p<0.05 v healthy controls for both). CONCLUSION: Failure of distension related reflexes impairs intestinal gas propulsion and clearance in patients with abdominal bloating.     

Effects of physical activity on intestinal gas transit and evacuation in healthy subjects

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of mild physical activity on intestinal gas transit and clearance. METHODS: In 8 healthy adults, a gas mixture was infused continuously into the jejunum (12 mL/min) for 120 minutes with simultaneous duodenal lipid perfusion (1 kcal/min). Gas evacuation, perception of abdominal sensations (on a scale of 0 [none] to 6 [pain]), and abdominal girth were measured at 15-minute intervals during rest and intermittent pedalling, with subjects in a supine position. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) intestinal gas retention was lower during exercise than at rest (-84 +/- 303 mL vs. 143 +/- 219 mL, P <0.05). Gas retention during rest was associated with significant abdominal distension (8 +/- 6 mm, P <0.01 vs. basal), which was decreased with exercise (3 +/- 7 mm, P <0.05 vs. rest). The gas challenge test was well tolerated both during exercise and rest (perception score: 0.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 0.9 +/- 0.4, P = 0.25). CONCLUSION: In healthy subjects, gut transit of intraluminal gas is enhanced by mild physical activity.     

Duodenal infusion of different nutrients and the site of gaseous stimulation influence intestinal gas dynamics

OBJECTIVE: Excessive intestinal gas can be involved in postprandial abdominal symptom generation, but whether the small bowel influences intestinal gas dynamics, depending on the ingested meal, remains to be demonstrated. We compare the intestinal response to a proximal and distal small intestinal gas challenge during different duodenal nutrient components. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We randomly studied 32 healthy subjects, twice, on different days with a gas mixture infused at 12 ml/min either directly into the proximal jejunum or into the ileum; during duodenal lipids, amino acids, glucose, at 1 kcal/min each, or saline (n=8 for each group). Gas evacuation was monitored continuously and abdominal perception and girth changes were assessed. RESULTS: In response to the jejunal gas challenge, duodenal lipids delayed intestinal gas clearance more potently than amino acids (733+/-26 ml and 541+/-108 ml final gas retention; p<0.001), but when gas was directly infused into the ileum the retained volumes were much smaller (271+/-78 ml and 96+/-51 ml; p<0.001). During duodenal glucose, intestinal gas clearance following jejunal or ileal gas infusion was not significantly influenced. Abdominal perception in response to the jejunal and ileal gas challenge only increased slightly during duodenal lipids (2.0+/-0.3 score and 2.3+/-0.6 score; p<0.05 versus control). CONCLUSION: Postprandial intestinal gas clearance is hampered by duodenal lipids and amino acids but not by glucose. Specific inhibitory effects are more pronounced when gas is infused into the jejunum, which underlines the importance of the small intestine in postprandial gas retention.     

Modulation of intestinal gas dynamics in healthy human volunteers by the 5-HT receptor agonist tegaserod

OBJECTIVES: Bloating in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) may result from impaired intestinal gas transit and is reduced by the 5-HT4 agonist tegaserod. Abnormal serotonergic function underlies many IBS symptoms, but the role of 5-HT4 pathways in regulating gas dynamics under healthy conditions is unexplored. We hypothesized that 5-HT4 activation by tegaserod stimulates gas transit in healthy individuals. METHODS: Sixteen normal volunteers underwent jejunal perfusion of gas mixtures (88% N2, 5.5% O2, 6.5% CO2) at 11.2 mL/min x 3 h under control conditions and 3 h after oral tegaserod 6 mg on separate days. Gas collected from an intrarectal catheter was quantified using a barostat. RESULTS: Under control conditions, gas evacuation after a lag period (1,959 +/- 428 s) was predominantly pulsatile with expulsion of 1,984 +/- 90 mL. A mean of 29 +/- 2 boluses with volumes of 72 +/- 5 mL were expelled. In 10 subjects with physiologic degrees of gas retention in control studies (248 +/- 73 mL), tegaserod increased expulsion from 1,768 +/- 73 to 1,973 +/- 37 mL and decreased retention to 43 +/- 37 mL (p < 0.05). Total volumes expelled as boluses were greater after tegaserod (1,708 +/- 73 vs 1,846 +/- 59 mL, p < 0.05) from increased bolus numbers in four subjects and increased bolus volumes in seven. Nonpulsatile continuous flow tended to increase with tegaserod (43 +/- 7 vs 126 +/- 43 mL, p= 0.10). Tegaserod did not increase evacuation in individuals without physiologic gas retention. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-HT4 agonist tegaserod promotes evacuation of jejunally perfused gas mixtures in healthy humans. These findings provide the foundation for future investigations into use of 5-HT4 agonists in conditions of pathologic gas retention.     

Abnormalities of GI transit in bloated irritable bowel syndrome: effect of bran on transit and symptoms

OBJECTIVES: Bloating is an important but poorly understood symptom in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) that is often aggravated by bran. The aim of our study was to determine whether IBS patients with bloating responded to bran differently from healthy controls. METHODS: A total of 12 patients with IBS (according to Rome I criteria), all with moderate to severe bloating, and 12 healthy controls participated in a two way, double blind, randomized, cross-over trial of bran versus placebo (crushed biscuits) 15 g b.i.d. An average daily pain index and bloating score were derived from daily symptom diaries. On day 14, gastric emptying, small bowel transit, percent remaining in ascending colon, and geometric center of a meal marker at 24 h were calculated from scintigraphic images obtained after ingesting a Tc99m-labeled rice pudding meal with 15 g of either placebo or coarse bran. RESULTS: Results are given as median (range). Bran significantly increased the pain index and bloating (p < 0.02) in IBS patients but not controls. The most striking finding was that the small bowel transit time of the meal without bran was markedly faster in IBS patients than in controls, being 203 min (range 109-313) versus 367 min (219-543), p < 0.001. Although in controls bran accelerated small bowel transit time to 262 min (180-380), p = 0.03, and significantly reduced % remaining in the ascending colon from 22% (0-46) to 3% (0-25), p = 0.03, this was not seen in the IBS patients. Bran accelerated whole gut transit as assessed by geometric center at 24 h in both IBS patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Bran accelerates small bowel transit and ascending colon clearance without causing symptoms in controls. Small bowel transit is rapid in IBS patients with bloating and, unlike in healthy control subjects, cannot be further accelerated by bran, which nevertheless aggravates symptoms of pain and bloating. We speculate that bran-induced bloating may originate in the colon rather than the small bowel.     

Impaired viscerosomatic reflexes and abdominal-wall dystony associated with bloating

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Abdominal bloating is a frequent complaint in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but its underlying mechanism remains uncertain. Our aim was to determine whether the abdominal wall, specifically its adaptation to intra-abdominal volumes, plays a role. METHODS: In 12 patients complaining of abdominal bloating (8 IBS and 4 functional bloating) and in 12 healthy controls, the effect of colonic gas load (24 mL/min rectal gas infusion for 1 hour) on perception (measured by a 0-6 scale), abdominal girth, and muscular activity was tested. With the participants sitting on an ergonomic chair and the trunk erect, multichannel electromyography was measured via bipolar surface electrodes located over the upper and lower rectus abdominis, and the external and internal oblique bilaterally. RESULTS: In healthy controls, colonic gas loads produced subjective symptoms (score, 3.0 +/- 0.3), objective abdominal distention (girth increment, 6 +/- 1 mm), and increased the activity of the abdominal muscles (external oblique activity, 11% +/- 3% in; P < .05 vs basal). At the same infused gas volumes, the patients developed significantly more symptoms (score, 4.5 +/- 0.4) and abdominal distention (11 +/- 1 mm; P < .05 vs healthy for both). These abnormal responses were associated with failed tonic contraction of the abdominal wall (external oblique activity change, -1% +/- 4%; P value not significant vs basal) and paradoxic relaxation of the internal oblique (activity reduction, 26% +/- 7%; P < .01 vs basal). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with bloating, abdominal perception and distention in response to intra-abdominal volume increments are exaggerated markedly and associated with muscular dystony of the abdominal wall.     

Sites of symptomatic gas retention during intestinal lipid perfusion in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND: Gas pooling within the gut may produce abdominal symptoms but the segment of the intestine responsible for gas retention is unknown. Our aim was to determine the role of the proximal and distal bowel in symptomatic gas accumulation using an experimental model of gas retention triggered by intraluminal lipids. SUBJECTS: Sixteen healthy subjects. METHODS: A gas mixture (N2, O2, and CO2 in venous proportions) was infused into the intestine at12 ml/min for three hours and gas evacuation was continuously measured via an anal cannula connected to a barostat. Abdominal perception and girth changes were measured at 10 minute intervals. Lipids (1 kcal/min) were simultaneously perfused either into the duodenum (n = 8) or into the ileum (n = 8). Each subject was studied twice on separate days, with gas infused into the jejunum or ileum. RESULTS: Duodenal lipids produced retention of gas infused into the jejunum (646 (62) ml) but the volume retained was much smaller when gas was infused directly into the ileum (262 (90) ml; p<0.05). The effects on gas retention were even more pronounced during ileal perfusion of lipids (1546 (184) ml during jejunal gas infusion and 847 (142) ml during ileal gas infusion; p<0.05). Abdominal distension correlated with the volume of gas retained (r = 0.87; p<0.001). Healthy subjects tolerated gas retention, and significant symptoms (score 3.7 (0.8)) developed only during jejunal gas infusion plus ileal lipid perfusion when gas retention was very large. CONCLUSION: Intraluminal lipids induce intestinal gas retention, predominantly acting on the proximal small bowel.     

Influence of body posture on intestinal transit of gas

BACKGROUND: Patients describe that body posture may affect their abdominal bloating, distension, and flatulence, but whether changes in position have objectively demonstrable effects, either beneficial or deleterious, has not been investigated. Aim: To determine the effect of body posture, upright versus supine, on intestinal transit of gas loads. SUBJECTS: Eight healthy subjects without gastrointestinal symptoms. METHODS: In each subject a gas mixture was continuously infused into the jejunum (12 ml/min) for three hours, and gas evacuation, clearance of a non- absorbable gaseous marker, perception, and abdominal girth were measured. Paired studies were randomly performed in each subject on separate days in the upright and supine positions. RESULTS: In the upright position, intestinal gas retention was much smaller than when supine (13 (52) ml v 146 (75) ml retention at 60 minutes, respectively; p<0.05), and clearance of the gas marker was expedited (72 (10)% clearance v 49 (16)% at 60 minutes, respectively; p<0.05). The gas challenge test was well tolerated both in the upright and supine positions without abdominal distension. CONCLUSION: Body posture has a significant influence on intestinal gas propulsion: transit is faster in the upright position than when supine.     

Impaired transit and tolerance of intestinal gas in the irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND: Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) frequently complain of excessive gas but their fasting volume of intestinal gas is apparently normal. We hypothesised that the pathophysiological mechanism involved may be impairment of intestinal gas transit. AIM: To investigate intestinal gas transit and tolerance in IBS patients compared with healthy subjects. METHODS: A gas mixture (N(2), O(2), and CO(2) in venous proportions) was infused into the jejunum of 20 patients with IBS and 20 healthy controls at 12 ml/min for four hours. Gas evacuation, initially flatus from the anus (two hours) and then intrarectally (two hours), was continuously recorded. Symptom perception (0-6 scale) and abdominal distension were measured at 10 minute intervals. RESULTS: After two hours of external gas (flatus) collection, 18 of 20 IBS patients had developed gas retention (>400 ml), increased gastrointestinal symptoms (score >3), or abdominal distension (>3 mm girth increment) compared with only four of 20 control subjects. During intrarectal gas collection, 13 of 17 patients still exhibited abnormal responses. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of patients with IBS can be shown to have impaired transit and tolerance of intestinal gas loads. This anomaly may represent a possible mechanism of IBS symptoms, specifically pain and bloating.     

Gastric distension and duodenal lipid infusion modulate intestinal gas transit and tolerance in humans

OBJECTIVE: Patients with unexplained abdominal complaints often attribute their symptoms to intestinal gas and indicate that symptoms are exacerbated by ingestion of a meal. However, the mechanisms responsible are unknown. Our aim was to analyze the specific influence of two meal-related factors, gastric distension, and intestinal nutrients, on intestinal gas dynamics and tolerance. METHODS: In 35 healthy subjects, gas evacuation and perception of jejunal gas infusion (12 ml/min) were measured for 3 h, during simultaneous duodenal infusion of saline, as control, lipids at 1 Kcal/min, or gastric distension. RESULTS: Infusion of lipids into the duodenum induced gas retention (584 +/- 154 ml, p < 0.05 vs 161 +/- 86 ml after saline infusion) without perception (2.2 +/- 0.5 score), whereas gastric distension induced perception (score 5.6 +/- 0.4, p < 0.05 vs score 1.9 +/- 0.4 after saline) without gas retention (7 +/- 205 ml). CONCLUSIONS: Different meal-related factors exert specific effects on intestinal gas dynamics and tolerance, and these mechanisms may interact to produce postprandial gas symptoms.     

Intestinal Gas Retention in Patients with Idiopathic Slow-Transit Constipation

Patients with slow-transit constipation (STC) have delayed colonic transit for solid und liquid bowel contents but intestinal gas handling has not been studied so far. Different nutrients influence motor and sensory gut function. We hypothesized that, in patients with STC, alteration of regulatory mechanisms may result in impaired intestinal gas dynamics. On 3 separate days, validated gas challenge was performed in 10 STC patients and 10 volunteers during duodenal saline, lipids, or intravenous glucose. During saline only 60% ± 8% of gas was cleared by STC patients after 60-min gas infusion, vs. 91% ± 2% by controls (P < 0.001). Acute hyperglycemia or lipids did not change intestinal gas dynamics in these patients (saline infusion), but compared to healthy subjects, significant intestinal gas retention occurred. In STC, disturbances of intestinal gas dynamics include basal intestinal gas retention, and this is virtually not affected by acute hyperglycemia or duodenal lipids.     

Effect of somatostatin analog on water and electrolyte transport and transit time in human small bowel

The present study was undertaken to investigate how a somatostatin analog (201-995 Sandoz), which is now commonly used for treatment of patients with gut hormone-producing tumors, affects water and ion absorption and transit time in the normal jejunum. Six healthy volunteers were given somatostatin analog intravenously at a dose of 1 microgram/kg/hr. At the same time, jejunal water and ion movement and transit time were measured using the triple-lumen tube technique [perfusion of a plasma-like electrolyte solution with PEG as a nonabsorbable marker at a rate of 15 ml/min; dye dilution curves ([3H]mannitol, [14C]PEG, BSP) for determination of jejunal transit time]. During somatostatin analog administration, transit time through a 30-cm segment of perfused jejunum increased from 4.0 min to 17.0 min. While the somatostatin analog increased jejunal transit time, it had no effect on net water and electrolyte absorption under steady-state conditions. The effect of somatostatin analog on the proximal small bowel is similar to the action of an eight-times higher dose of intravenous native somatostatin previously studied. The effect of the analog on transit time suggests a potentially beneficial effect in patients with large-volume diarrhea in which no tumor or circulating secretagogue can be identified, such as in pseudopancreatic cholera syndrome.     

Response to intraluminal gas in irritable bowel syndrome

Our aim was to evaluate the response to intraluminal gas in irritable bowel syndrome and to determine whether this response was consequent upon disordered motility or altered perception. We evaluated 10 patients who satisfied the clinical criteria for the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome and 10 healthy controls. An eight-lumen perfused catheter assembly was positioned to monitor motor activity in the duodenum and proximal jejunum; a separate side port in the distal duodenum permitted gas infusion. Subjects recorded symptoms of abdominal pain, bloating, and nausea throughout the study, using a visual analog scale. Following an overnight fast and a 60-min basal recording period in the fasted state, subjects ate a standard meal; 60 min later, sham gas was administered for 20 min, followed by the actual infusion of nitrogen gas at 40 ml/min. Subjects were randomized to receive atropine (7 µg/kg) or placebo intravenously during the period of actual gas infusion. Patients with irritable bowel syndrome described more pain (score, mean±se, control versus irritable bowel: 0.22±0.16 vs 1.65±0.5,P<0.01) and nausea (0.25±0.21 vs 1.45±0.64,P<0.04) during sham gas; motility indices were similar in both groups. During active gas, irritable bowel syndrome patients reported more pain (0.40±0.39 vs 2.94±1.16,P<0.03); motility indices at all sites were similar in both groups. Symptom severity in irritable bowel syndrome subjects randomized to receive atropine was similar to control subjects during active gas infusion; motility indices were similar. We conclude that irritable bowel syndrome patients are more sensitive to intraluminal gas. This does not appear related to an exaggerated motor response, but may reflect heightened central perception.Supported in part by a grant from the University of Nebraska Hospital.Presented, in part, at the annual meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association, Boston, Massachusetts, May 1993, and has appeared in abstract form. Gastroenterology 104:A 511, 1993.     

Gas distribution within the human gut: effect of meals

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients frequently complain of gas symptoms precipitated by meals, but the effect of early digestion on intestinal gas content remains unknown. Our aim was to determine the influence of meals on intestinal gas volume and distribution. METHODS: First, we developed a CT image analysis program, based on independent software modules, to measure gas content within the gut. The system was validated in nine healthy subjects by taking helical abdominal CT scans before and after rectal infusion of known volumes of air (100-400 mL). In 15 healthy subjects, intestinal gas distribution was measured in fast and early postcibal CT scans. The postcibal scan was taken 99 +/- 22 minutes after a 597 +/- 57 kcal meal. RESULTS: The volume of gas infused per rectum was detected with an accuracy of 100.4 +/- 3.0%. During fasting, intestinal gas volume was 94 +/- 7 mL (excluding two extreme outliers). After the meal, gas content within the gut increased by 64.7% (up to 149 +/- 21 mL, P < 0.01 vs fast) and the increment occurred in the colon (59 +/- 9 mL precibal vs 121 +/- 20 mL postcibal, P < 0.001), while other gut compartments remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Ingestion of a meal activated gas metabolism and increased gas content within the gut. The increment occurred early, presumably prior to colonic fermentation of food substrates and was localized in the distal gut, suggesting that gas had a proximal origin and was propelled caudally.     

Intestinal gas distribution determines abdominal symptoms

BACKGROUND: Patients with functional gut disorders manifest poor tolerance to intestinal gas loads but the mechanism of this dysfunction is unknown. AIM: Our aims were firstly, to explore the relative importance of the amount of intestinal gas versus its distribution on symptom production, and secondly, to correlate gut motility and perception of gas loads. SUBJECTS: Fourteen healthy subjects with no gastrointestinal symptoms. METHODS: In each subject a gas mixture was infused (12 ml/min) either into the jejunum or rectum for one hour during blocked rectal gas outflow, and subsequently gas clearance was measured over one hour of free rectal evacuation. We measured abdominal perception, distension, and gut tone by duodenal and rectal barostats. RESULTS: Similar magnitude of gas retention (720 ml) produced significantly more abdominal symptoms with jejunal compared with rectal infusion (perception score 4.4 (0.4) v 1.5 (0.5), respectively; p<0.01) whereas abdominal distension was similar (15 (2) mm and 14 (1) mm girth increment, respectively). Jejunal gas loads were associated with proximal contraction (by 57 (5)%) and colonic loads with distal relaxation (by 99 (20)%). CONCLUSION: The volume of gas within the gut determines abdominal distension whereas symptom perception depends on intraluminal gas distribution and possibly also on the gut motor response to gas loads.     

Role of the Jejunum Versus Ileum on Intestinal Gas Dynamics During a Balanced Meal in Healthy Subjects

Under physiological conditions, the human gut adapts intestinal gas propulsion and evacuation to prevent intestinal gaseous complaints In this study we aimed to determine influences of the jejunum versus ileum on intestinal gas dynamics during a balanced meal. Paired studies were randomly performed with seven women and three men, ages 28–42. A mixed liquid meal was infused (1 kcal/min) into the duodenum. After 30 min, gas was infused (12 ml/min) into the jejunum or ileum for 150 min. Gas expulsion was measured, and perception and girth changes were assessed. Postprandial intestinal gas propulsion was uneventful and recovery complete, with −7± 58 and −92± 44 ml final intestinal gas retention for jejunal and ileal gas infusion, respectively. Neither significant differences in abdominal perception nor changes in abdominal girth were seen. During a balanced meal, intestinal gas is effectively propulsed aborally, and this does not depend on the site of the small intestinal stimulation.