Modulating atherosclerosis through inhibition or blockade of angiotensin

Angiotensin-convertng enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are well recognized for their benefits in treating hypertension and congestive heart failure and preventing postmyocardial infarction heart failure or left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Recently, blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor was shown to reduce cardiovascular events in hypertensive subjects with LV hypertrophy. Several lines of evidence are now converging to show that ACE inhibitors may affect the atherosclerotic process itself. Emerging clinical data indicate that angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) may possibly modulate atherosclerosis as well. The antiatherogenic properties of ACE inhibitors and ARBs may derive from inhibition or blockade of angiotensin II, now recognized as an agent that increases oxidative stress.Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin-receptor blockade also increase endothelial nitric oxide formation, which improves endothelial function. In contrast to the effects of ARBs, the vascular effects of ACE inhibitors may, in part, be mediated by an increase in bradykinin. This article reviews some of the biologic mechanisms whereby ACE inhibitors and ARBs may modulate atherosclerosis.     

Angiotensin receptor blockers: evidence for preserving target organs

Hypertension is a major problem throughout the developed world. Although current antihypertensive treatment regimens reduce morbidity and mortality, patients are often noncompliant, and medications may not completely normalize blood pressure. As a result, current therapy frequently does not prevent or reverse the cardiovascular remodeling that often occurs when blood pressure is chronically elevated. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is effective in controlling hypertension and treating congestive heart failure. Both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) inhibit the activity of the RAS, but these two classes of antihypertensive medications have different mechanisms of action and different pharmacologic profiles. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors block a single pathway in the production of angiotensin II (Ang II). In addition, angiotensin I is not the only substrate for ACE. The ACE inhibitors also block the degradation of bradykinin that may have potential benefits in cardiovascular disease. Bradykinin is, however, the presumed cause of cough associated with ACE inhibitor therapy. Data from clinical trials on ACE inhibitors serve to support the involvement of the RAS in the development of cardiovascular disease. Angiotensin receptor blockers act distally in the RAS to block the Ang II type 1 (AT1) receptor selectively. Thus, ARBs are more specific agents and avoid many side effects. Experimental and clinical trials have documented the efficacy of ARBs in preserving target-organ function and reversing cardiovascular remodeling. In some instances, maximal benefit may be obtained with Ang II blockade using both ARBs and ACE inhibitors. This review describes clinical trials that document the efficacy of ARBs in protecting the myocardium, blood vessels, and renal vasculature.     

Rationale for the use of angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (part I of II)

Almost 5 million individuals in the United States are diagnosed with chronic heart failure (HF), and the prevalence is increasing. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta blockers, neurohormonal antagonists that block the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the sympathetic nervous system, respectively, have been shown in clinical trials to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with HF, and these therapies are now integral components of standard HF treatment. Yet, morbidity and mortality rates in HF remain unacceptably high, and the limitations of current standard therapies are becoming increasingly apparent. About 10% of patients with HF are unable to tolerate ACE inhibitors, often because of cough. In addition, ACE inhibition may not completely block the RAS because angiotensin II, the main end product of the RAS, can be generated via non-ACE enzymatic pathways. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) may exert more complete RAS blockade than ACE inhibitors by interfering with the binding of angiotensin II at the receptor level, regardless of the enzymatic pathway of production. They are also better tolerated than ACE inhibitors and have been shown to improve symptoms and function in clinical trials in patients with HF. These factors provide a strong rationale for the study of the clinical effects of ARBs in patients with HF.     

Angiotensin II receptor blockers in congestive heart failure

The benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for the treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF) are well-established. A newer class of medications, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), may be a suitable replacement for ACE inhibitors as a result of a more complete inhibition of angiotensin II and better tolerability among patients. To examine the current literature on the efficacy and safety of ARBs in the setting of CHF, a Medline search was conducted of the English language literature for the years 1987 to 2005. Clinical trials that reported data on cardiac outcomes were reviewed. The earlier trials were direct ARB to ACE inhibitor comparisons (ELITE I and ELITE II). These studies indicated that ARBs do not confer an improvement in cardiac outcomes over ACE inhibitors. RESOLVD, Val-HeFT, and the 3 separate trials of the CHARM program investigated the addition of an ARB to standard therapy. The RESOLVD trial showed no significant differences in clinical events among ACE inhibitor, ARB, and their combination. Although no mortality benefit was evident in the Val-HeFT trial, a substantial reduction in CHF rehospitalizations was reported among patients who were not receiving ACE inhibitor therapy. The CHARM-Overall program demonstrated a significant benefit in cardiovascular death and hospital admissions for CHF with the addition of ARB to standard therapy, a benefit that was more pronounced in patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. In the setting of CHF, rates of cardiac outcomes do not differ substantially between ARBs and ACE inhibitors. However, their combination may improve outcomes for patients with CHF.     

Recent insight into therapy of congestive heart failure: focus on ACE inhibition and angiotensin-II antagonism

One possible intervention to interrupt the deleterious effects of the renin-angiotensin system is suppression of angiotensin II (Ang II) formation by inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). However, ACE inhibition incompletely suppresses Ang II formation and also leads to accumulation of bradykinin. Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptors are believed to promote the known deleterious effects of Ang II. Therefore, AT1 receptor antagonists have been recently introduced into therapy for hypertension and congestive heart failure (CHF). Although there are significant differences between the effects of AT1 receptor antagonists and ACE inhibitors including the unopposed stimulation of angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptors by AT1 receptor antagonists, the discussion of whether ACE inhibitors, AT1 receptor antagonists or the combination of both are superior in the pharmacotherapy of CHF is still largely theoretical. Accordingly, AT1 receptor antagonists are still investigational. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors remain first line therapy in patients with CHF due to systolic dysfunction. However, in patients not able to tolerate ACE inhibitor induced side effects, in particular cough, AT1 receptor antagonism is a good alternative. In clinical practice, emphasis should be placed on increasing the utilization of ACE inhibitors, as more than 50% of patients with CHF do not receive ACE inhibitors. In addition, the majority of those on ACE inhibitors receive doses lower than the dosage used in the large clinical trials. Although not yet completely proved, it is likely that high doses of ACE inhibition are superior to low doses with respect to prognosis and symptoms.     

AT(1)-receptor blockade and the kidney: importance of non-ACE pathways in health and disease

Large-scale trials with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1))-receptor blockers have clearly shown that blockade of the renin-angiotensin system reduces the deterioration in renal function associated with diabetes. AT(1)-receptor blockers represent a more rational approach to blockade of this system than ACE inhibitors, due to the presence of non-ACE pathways of angiotensin II formation. Studies in healthy volunteers maintained on a low-salt diet indicate that such pathways account for approximately 30-40% of total angiotensin II formation, and this figure increases to 60-70% in individuals maintained on a high-salt diet (resembling the situation in most human populations). Activation of the renin-angiotensin system is increased in diabetic patients, and comparison of the renal vascular responses to captopril and candesartan shows a strong correlation between the effects of ACE inhibition and AT(1)-receptor blockade, indicating that the deleterious effects of renin-angiotensin system activation in diabetes are mediated largely through angiotensin II. The presence of multiple risk factors, such as genetic predisposition, hyperglycaemia, obesity and tissue damage, places diabetic patients at high risk of disease related to activation of the renin-angiotensin system. Effective and early blockade of this system is therefore an important aspect of management.     

Clinical update: the role of angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (Part II of II)

Almost 5 million individuals in the United States have chronic heart failure (HF), which is increasing in prevalence. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are standard therapies for HF, although more than 10% of patients with HF are unable to tolerate these agents. Furthermore, ACE inhibitors may not provide complete blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in the long term. Because angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) may block the RAS more completely than ACE inhibitors and are better tolerated, several large-scale ARB trials have been performed exploring their potential role in treating patients with symptomatic HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study (ELITE II) demonstrated no significant differences in morbidity and mortality between the ARB losartan and the ACE inhibitor captopril among elderly patients with HF. The Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) demonstrated reductions in hospitalizations for HF with the ARB valsartan when added to standard HF therapy, with no effect on mortality. Both trials suggested a potential negative interaction between ARB and beta-blocker therapy. The Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program demonstrated significant reductions in morbidity and mortality with the ARB candesartan in patients with HF due to systolic dysfunction, with or without ACE inhibitors and with or without beta blockers. Thus, the addition of ARBs to the treatment regimen of patients with symptomatic HF should be strongly considered.     

Adherence to treatment guidelines in the pharmacological management of chronic heart failure in an Australian population

Background To document the pharmacotherapy of chronic heart failure (CHF) and to evaluate the adherence to treatment guidelines in Australian population. Methods The pharmacological management of 677 patients (female 46.7%, 75.5 ± 11.6 years) with CHF was retrospectively analyzed. Results The use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and β-blockers were 58.2 % and 34.7 %, respectively. Major reasons for non-use of ACE inhibitors/ARBs were hyperkalemia and elevated serum creatinine level. For patients who did not receive β-blockers, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were the main contraindications. Treatment at or above target dosages for ACE inhibitors/ARBs and β-blockers was low for each medication (40.3% and 28.9%, respectively). Conclusions Evidenced-based medical therapies for heart failure were under used in a rural patient population. Further studies are required to develop processes to improve the optimal use of heart failure medications.     

Effects of candesartan on the proteinuria of chronic glomerulonephritis

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are commonly used for the treatment of hypertension, progressive chronic renal disease, diabetic nephropathy, and congestive heart failure. Because angiotensin II acts through membrane bound type 1 (AT1) and type 2 (AT2) receptors, ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II-receptor antagonists have distinct effects. ACE inhibitors inhibit production of angiotensin II thus suppressing the action of angiotensin II on both AT1 and AT2. In contrast, the effect of AT1-receptor antagonists is to selectively block the activation of the AT1 receptor. This AT1-receptor blockade leaves the AT2 receptors unopposed to elevated levels of endogenous angiotensin II. Thus, there may be an advantage of AT1-receptor blockade over ACE inhibition in the management of a variety of chronic vascular diseases, including chronic glomerulonephritis and other glomerular diseases. In a clinical trial candesartan, an AT1-receptor antagonist, effectively lowered urinary protein excretion in patients with chronic glomerular nephritis. Evidence indicates that functionally active AT1 receptors, as well as AT2 receptors, are present in both afferent and efferent arteriole of the glomerulus, and that angiotensin II induces afferent and efferent arteriolar dilatation via AT2 receptors.     

Anti-diabetic effect of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system

Diabetes, which is frequently associated with hypertension, accelerates the development of hypertension-induced cardiovascular disease. Thus, the prevention of diabetes is important in the management of hypertension. Recent clinical megastudies have suggested that the blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) inhibits new onset of diabetes. Thus, the agents to inhibit the RAS should be beneficial for glucose metabolism. However, the cardiovascular protective effects of ACE inhibitors and ARBs are not always superior to other classes of drugs. Further long-term clinical trials are necessary to clarify the anti-diabetic effect of the RAS-inhibiting agents.     

Efficacy of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Cardiovascular Disease

The cardiovascular continuum describes the progression of pathophysiologic events from cardiovascular risk factors to symptomatic cardiovascular disease (CVD) and life-threatening events. Pharmacologic intervention early in the continuum may prevent or slow CVD development and improve quality of life. The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) is central to the pathophysiology of CVD at many stages of the continuum. Numerous clinical trials of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have shown that RAAS blockade provides benefits to patients across the continuum. ARBs are as effective as ACE inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension; however tolerability and adherence to therapy appear to be improved with ARBs. Large clinical trials have shown that ARBs may provide therapeutic benefits beyond blood pressure control in patients with diabetes, heart failure or at risk of heart failure following a myocardial infarction. In addition, ARBs have been shown to provide protective effects in patients with impaired renal function or left ventricular hypertrophy. Additional clinical trials are ongoing to further characterize the role of ARBs in CVD management.     

Left ventricular hypertrophy and angiotensin II receptor blocking agents

Angiotensin II plays a significant role in cell growth and proliferation in model systems and in humans. Numerous studies have shown that left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) increases the risk of coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure, stroke or transient ischemic attack; all-cause deaths, and sudden death. The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has provided beneficial effects on LVH regression and on cardiac remodeling in the presence of hypertension and heart failure. The new class of ARBs appears to provide cardioprotective effects that are similar to those of the ACE inhibitors. Most of the beneficial effects provided by these agents appear to be related to a more complete blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor. However, costimulation of the angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor appears to increase nitric oxide and thus causes some bradykinin-like effects. Evidence for the role of angiotensin II in promoting LVH as well as abnormal regulation of the angiotensin II signal transduction pathways in model systems and in humans has been reviewed. Secondly, the mechanisms for the beneficial effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers studied in model systems and in humans, including possible involvement in the formation of reactive oxygen species by mononuclear cells, are presented. Finally, results from large-scale interventions such as the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction (LIFE) study, as well as an overview of the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial involving the use of ARB in high-risk patients, are presented.     

The role of angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of heart failure patients

Evidence from large, randomized, controlled clinical trials supports the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta blockers, and spironolactone to reduce mortality and morbidity. Despite these effective therapies, event rates related to heart failure remain high. Although ACE inhibitors reduce angiotensin II production, they do not fully suppress the increased angiotensin II production in heart failure. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) directly block the effect of angiotensin II, derived from any source, at the receptor level and have the potential to be as effective or even more effective than ACE inhibitors. The results of a number of clinical studies have demonstrated ARBs are effective and well tolerated. However, no studies have demonstrated a convincing decrease in mortality with ARB use, although a decrease has been observed for heart failure hospitalization. The results from further studies are awaited to clarify the role of ARBs in the treatment of heart failure.     

The role of angiotensin receptor blockers in the management of chronic heart failure

Clinical and basic science research has repeatedly confirmed the importance of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the pathophysiology of chronic heart failure. Accordingly, blockade of this system by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has assumed a central role in the treatment of heart failure. Recently, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have gained prominence as a possible substitute for ACE inhibitors in therapy for heart failure. However, clinical data compiled on this use of ARBs have shown them to be useful only as alternative therapy in ACE inhibitor-intolerant patients. Continuing large-scale clinical investigations may lead to an expansion of their role in therapy for various cardiovascular diseases.     

The role of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular disease

Pharmacologic attenuation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) either through angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition or angiotensin II receptor blockade now occupies a central role in the management of hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, and cardiovascular and renal disease. Although our understanding and use of these agents has expanded significantly over the past decade, the relative and differential benefits of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are still not entirely clear. The data continue to support the first-line use of ACE inhibitors for all indications. Results for combination ACE inhibitor and ARB therapy in clinical outcome trials have been disappointing and do not support its use. New strategies for RAAS modulation bring hope for further progress in the treatment of hypertensive and cardiovascular disease.     

Renin inhibition: A new modality for hypertension management

Renin is the first and rate-limiting step cleaving angiotensinogen to angiotensin I, thus influencing angiotensin II (Ang II) formation. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) is effective in management of several cardiovascular diseases; however, control continues to be difficult and requires multiple drug therapy. Use of RAS inhibitors does not totally prevent Ang II formation, which could continue to contribute to development of end-organ damage. Over the past two decades, renin inhibition seemed to be an attractive approach for complete blockade of the RAS. Recently, aliskiren, a renin inhibitor, was approved as the first of a new class of antihypertension drugs. Clinical trials demonstrated significant blood pressure reduction in hypertensive patients with aliskiren used alone or combined with hydrochlorothiazide, ACE inhibitors, or ARBs. Studies are in progress to evaluate the potential role for renin inhibition in management of kidney and cardiac diseases.     

Long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin I--receptor inhibition in pacing-induced heart failure: effects on myocardial interstitial bradykinin levels.

BACKGROUND: We examined whether and to what degree long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, angiotensin type 1 (AT(1))-receptor blockade, or combined inhibition in developing congestive heart failure (CHF) alter myocardial interstitial bradykinin (BF) levels. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pigs (27-30 kg) underwent rapid pacing-induced CHF (240 bpm, 3 weeks; n = 10); pacing CHF with concomitant ACE inhibition (benezaprilat, 3.75 mg/day; n = 10); pacing CHF and concomitant AT(1)-receptor blockade (valsartan, 60 mg/day; n = 10); pacing CHF and combined inhibition (benezaprilat/valsartan, 1.87/60 mg/day, respectively; n = 10); or served as controls (no pacing, no treatment; n = 10). Steady-state myocardial interstitial BK levels were quantitated by microdialysis. Cardiac output decreased to 1.95 +/- 0.18 L/min in pacing CHF compared with control (3.78 +/- 0.38; P < .05). Cardiac output increased from untreated CHF values with concomitant ACE inhibition (3.91 +/- 0.27 L/min), AT(1)-receptor blockade (3.30 +/- 0.41 L/min), or combined ACE/AT(1)-receptor inhibition (4.13 +/- 0.32 L/min; all P < .05 v CHF). With pacing CHF, myocardial interstitial BK levels were reduced by approximately 50% from control values and were normalized in the ACE inhibition and combined inhibition groups. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term ACE inhibition increases myocardial interstitial BK levels with CHF; addition of AT(1)-receptor blockade does not seem to abrogate these effects.     

Suppression of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in chronic heart failure: choice of agents and clinical impact

Chronic heart failure (CHF) has taken on epidemic proportions in the United States, with approximately 550,000 new cases annually. With the evolution of pharmacotherapy targeting neurohormonal pathways over the past 2 decades, the annual mortality in subjects with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV has dramatically improved from 52% in the seminal CONSENSUS trial to less than 20% in more recent trials in CHF. Suppression of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with various angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has been proven to save lives in several large-scale trials of CHF, and all of them can be used at doses tested in clinical trials without clear preference of one over another. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) can be used in place of ACE inhibitors in the case of ACE inhibitor intolerance with comparable results. However, some inconsistencies exist between trials with ARBs, and it is uncertain if the ARBs tested in clinical trials provide comparable clinical benefit whether used in place of or in combination with ACE inhibitors. Once ACE inhibition has been started, beta blockade should follow for all subjects with symptomatic CHF. Triple neurohormonal blockade can then be accomplished with the addition of an aldosterone receptor or ARB. Regardless of the exact agent used or sequence of initiation, the critical importance of careful monitoring of neurohormonal blockade cannot be overstated. Renal failure and hyperkalemia are the most important complications of suppression of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), and an increase in hospital admissions and death from hyperkalemia after publication of the RALES trial illustrates the danger of "casual" use of neurohormonal blockers. In light of the tremendous benefits of neurohormonal blockade, the only conclusion from these data is to initiate RAAS-blocking agents following the safety precautions tested in the respective clinical trials.     

Therapeutic implications of escape from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients with chronic heart failure

The level of inhibition of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) provided by standard doses of ACE inhibitors may only be partial during long-term treatment in patients with severe chronic heart failure (CHF). Partial ACE inhibition with time is often referred to as escape from ACE inhibition and labeled ACE escape. Several lines of evidence suggest that ACE escape occurs in patients with severe CHF. Plasma levels of angiotensin II rise above initial values during long-term ACE inhibition, and the effects of ACE inhibitors on cardiac remodeling and lowering of sympathetic nervous system activity attenuate after 1 year of treatment. Moreover, angiotensin II type I receptor blockade (ARB) produces clinical and hemodynamic benefits in patients with CHF who are already receiving ACE inhibitors. The therapeutic implications of ACE escape include evaluation of higher-than-standard doses of ACE inhibitors and routine addition of ARB to ACE inhibition in patients with severe CHF. Data are reviewed to demonstrate that ACE escape reflects inadequate ACE dosage rather than a decrease in ACE inhibition occurring with time.