The effect of assay methods on plasma levels and pharmacokinetics of theophylline: HPLC and EIA.

1 The effects of two assay methods, HPLC and EIA, on theophylline plasma levels (n = 254) and pharmacokinetics (n = 6) were examined on blood samples obtained from asthmatic patients and normal adult male volunteers. 2 The standard curves obtained and the plasma level values during plasma level monitoring of theophylline measured with two methods are well correlated each other within concentration range of 2.5 to 20.0 microgram/ml (P less than 0.001). EIA, however in general, appears to give a lower value than HPLC. 3 The values of plasma theophylline half-life and clearance analyzed using a two-compartment open system model were found different between the two assay methods and dissimilar to those previously reported by using ultraviolet method. 4 The sampling end-point and/or assay sensitivity particularly to measure a lower level of theophylline (less than 2.5 microgram/ml) can influence the pharmacokinetics for a potent bronchodilator with a narrow therapeutic margin, theophylline.     

Ranitidine upon meal-induced gastric secretion: oral pharmacokinetics and plasma concentration effect relationships.

1 Ranitidine oral kinetics and plasma concentration-effect relationships upon meal-induced gastric secretion were investigated in normal subjects. Four oral doses of ranitidine (50, 100, 150 or 200 mg) and placebo were tested. 2 Oral ranitidine showed a terminal half-life of about 2 h 25 min. Maximal plasma level was about 240 ng/ml for a 100 mg dose, and occurred about 1 h after dose. From the range of 50 to 200 mg dose, no indication of non-linearity was observed in the drug kinetics. 3 Ranitidine administration resulted in a dose-related reduction in meal-stimulated acid secretion reaching, 46, 70, 82 and 92%, respectively. Mean ranitidine plasma concentrations producing 50 and 80% inhibition of acid secretion were 73 and 180 ng/ml, respectively, with great inter-individual variability. 150 and 200 mg ranitidine oral doses maintained IC50 for at least 4.5 and 5.5 h, respectively. Upon oral administration, ranitidine exerted no effect on gastric emptying of the meal but slightly decreased the gastrin response to the meal.     

赖诺普利对盐酸马尼地平大鼠体内药动学影响

目的考察赖诺普利对盐酸马尼地平在大鼠体内药动学行为的影响。方法将大鼠随机分为单用盐酸马尼地平0.9 mg·kg-1组和联用盐酸马尼地平0.9 mg·kg-1+赖诺普利0.9 mg·kg-1组,于灌胃给药后0~12.0 h内取静脉血,采用LC-MS/MS法测定血浆中盐酸马尼地平的质量浓度,以DAS 2.0计算药动学参数,SPSS 17.0进行统计分析。结果单用组与联用组盐酸马尼地平的药动学参数结果为:ρmax分别为(144.6±24.39)μg·L-1和(150.2±24.63)μg·L-1,AUC0-t分别为(489.4±190.5)μg·h·L-1和(573.3±196.4)μg·h·L-1,AUC0-∞分别为(566.7±233.4)μg·h·L-1和(666.4±283.0)μg·h·L-1,tmax分别为(0.8±0.21)h和(1.05±0.57)h,Vz/F分别为(1.84±0.82)L·kg-1和(1.56±0.65)L·kg-1,Cl/F分别为(7.90±3.67)L·h-1·kg-1和(6.28±1.69)L·h-1·kg-1。两组tmax、AUC0-t、Cl/F、ρmax、AUC0-∞、Vz/F和Cl/F均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论赖诺普利对盐酸马尼地平在大鼠体内药动学行为无影响,提示临床联合给药无需调整马尼地平给药剂量及时间间隔。     

Lack of effect of ponsinomycin on the plasma pharmacokinetics of theophylline

Summary The influence of ponsinomycin on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline has been studied in 12 young healthy volunteers. They received 10 doses of theophylline 200 mg every 8 h p.o., successively in the absence and then in the presence of ponsinomycin. This new macrolide, structurally related to midecamycin, was given in the therapeutic dose of 800 mg b.d. for 5 days, starting 2 days before the second phase of treatment with theophylline.The pharmacokinetic parameters of theophylline, calculated from its plasma concentration at steady-state, were not affected by the co-treatment. In particular, there was no significant difference between the peak and trough plasma levels, apparent clearance or apparent elimination half-life of theophylline in the absence and the presence of ponsinomycin. Only renal clearance was slightly (27%) but significantly increased by the co-treatment. The results suggest that ponsinomycin would be a good choice if a macrolide antibiotic were needed in patients being treated with theophylline.     

Disopyramide pharmacokinetics and metabolism: effect of inducers.

1. The disposition of orally administered disopyramide was studied in a population of smokers (n = 6) and non-smokers (n = 8) before and during phenobarbitone treatment (100 mg daily for 21 days; Cp 21st day = 13.9 +/- 2.0 micrograms ml-1). The comparative inducibility of these populations by phenobarbitone was assessed as was the inductive effect of cigarette smoking, per se. Furthermore, the determinants of the intensity of the inductive effect were examined, as well as the effect of the barbiturate on the binding of disopyramide to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AGP). 2. Smokers and non-smokers exhibited similar half-lives (6.48 +/- 1.49 vs 6.66 +/- 1.02 h), apparent total body clearances (0.100 +/- 0.020 vs 0.117 +/- 0.034 l h-1 kg-1), mean renal clearances (0.043 +/- 0.0093 vs 0.057 +/- 0.013 l h-1 kg-1) and apparent intrinsic metabolic clearances (0.057 +/- 0.015 vs 0.060 +/- 0.024 l h-1 kg-1) before phenobarbitone treatment. 3. Both populations responded comparably to barbiturate exposure in that apparent intrinsic metabolic clearance more than doubled. Interestingly, the magnitude of this increase was highly dependent on the observed baseline apparent intrinsic metabolic clearance, (r' = 0.81; P less than 0.001). 4. Phenobarbitone treatment of non-smokers resulted in an increase in the AUC of the active metabolite N-despropyl disopyramide (MND), but not significantly (3.8 +/- 1.6 vs 4.1 +/- 2.3 micrograms ml-1 h). Similar results were observed in smokers (3.5 +/- 1.4 vs 3.9 +/- 2.0 micrograms ml-1 h, respectively). 5. The percent of administered dose recovered in urine as disopyramide in non-smokers was significantly decreased upon phenobarbitone treatment (43 +/- 6% vs 25 +/- 5%), whereas the percent of dose recovered as MND increased significantly in this group (25 +/- 6% vs 31 +/- 5%). The population of smokers responded similarly. 6. At doses typically used to achieve hepatic microsomal enzyme induction in man, phenobarbitone treatment caused no significant change or trend towards a change in serum AGP concentrations as measured using the radial immunodiffusion method in nonsmokers (67.4 +/- 19.9 mg dl-1 vs 68.0 +/- 40.7 mg dl-1) or smokers (64.5 +/- 15.7 vs 67.9 +/- 14.9). Similarly, when AGP concentration was estimated in serum from non-smokers using a nephelometric method no effect attributable to phenobarbitone was observed (47.9 +/- 1.3 vs 47.9 +/- 16.8 mg dl-1). Consistent with this observation, disopyramide free fraction was not affected by barbiturate treatment.     

The effect of propranolol on luteinising hormone and prolactin plasma concentrations in hypertensive women

1 Chronic propranolol treatment has been previously shown to lower the plasma concentrations of LH and prolactin in normal male volunteers. 2 The effect of 2 weeks treatment with propranolol (80 mg twice daily) on the plasma concentrations of LH and prolactin has now been investigated in five post menopausal hypertensive women. 3 There was no significant effect of propranolol treatment on the basal plasma concentrations of either hormone. Both hormones showed significant increases in plasma concentration following GnRH stimulation and these increases were also unaffected by propranolol treatment.     

Differential effect of clomipramine treatment on m-chlorophenylpiperazine-induced increases in plasma prolactin and corticosterone in rats

Intravenous administration of m-chlorophenylpiperazine (m-CPP, a serotonin agonist) to rats increased plasma prolactin and corticosterone concentrations. Long-term (21-day) and short-term (3-day) treatment with the tricyclic antidepressant, clomipramine, did not have any significant effect on baseline levels of either prolactin or corticosterone. Long-term but not short-term clomipramine treatment significantly potentiated m-CPP's effect on plasma prolactin. On the other hand, both long-term and short-term clomipramine treatment significantly attenuated m-CPP's effect on plasma corticosterone. These findings are consistent with other animal and clinical studies demonstrating a differential effect of antidepressant treatment on two different serotonin-mediated neuroendocrine functions.     

Effect of plasma exchange on flumequine pharmacokinetics: comparison with control kinetics.

The effect of plasma exchange (PE) on the pharmacokinetics of flumequine (Apurone) was studied in eight patients receiving a single oral dose of 800 mg. The maximum concentration (38 micrograms/ml) and time to maximum concentration (2.6 h) values were not significantly altered by PE beginning 3 h after administration of flumequine. There was no change in the terminal elimination half-lives (6.6 h), in the steady-state volume of distribution (29 L), or in the apparent plasma clearance (2.5 L/h). By contrast, PE decreased the mean residence time by 30% (14.3 +/- 4.1 h without PE; 9.88 +/- 1.36 h with PE; p less than 0.05). The amount of flumequine extracted by PE (72 mg) was proportional to the plasma concentration at the beginning of the exchange. The elimination half-life during PE (3.15 +/- 1.23 h) decreased by 40%. Renal clearance (0.3 L/h) was not affected. PE only partially modifies the pharmacokinetics of flumequine administered in a single oral dose before PE.     

The effect of antacid and ranitidine on droxicam pharmacokinetics.

Droxicam is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that is a pro-drug of piroxicam. The influence of concomitant administration of antacid or ranitidine on droxicam pharmacokinetics has been investigated. On three separate phases, 15 healthy volunteers received a single oral 20-mg dose of droxicam either alone, with antacid (400 mg aluminum hydroxide + 400 mg magnesium hydroxide, three times/day), or with ranitidine (300 mg, two times/day) for 6 days. Piroxicam, the active substance from droxicam, was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. The pharmacokinetic parameters for droxicam given alone were: maximum peak plasma concentration (Cmax) = 1.53 +/- .21 micrograms/mL (mean +/- SD), time to peak concentration (Tmax) = 7.5 +/- 2.1 hr, t1/2a = 1.38 +/- .82 hour, t1/2el = 53.3 +/- 11.9 hr, Cl/F = 2.98 +/- .71 mL/min, volume of distribution (Vd/F) = 13.2 +/- 1.8 L and area under the curve (AUC) = 117.6 +/- 26.8 micrograms/hour/mL. The subject effect was significant for all the pharmacokinetic parameters except for the absorption half-life (P < .05). Concomitant antacid or ranitidine administration had no significant effect on any of the droxicam pharmacokinetic parameters. The results of this study suggest that antacid or ranitidine do not significantly alter the oral absorption or pharmacokinetic disposition of single-dose droxicam.     

Remoxipride and raclopride differentially alter the activity of incertohypothalamic dopaminergic neurons.

The effects of two dopaminergic (DA) antagonists, raclopride (S-(-)-3,5-dichloro-N-[(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-2-hydroxy- 6-methoxybenzamide(+)-tartrate) and remoxipride (S(-)-3-bromo-N-[(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-2, 6-dimethoxybenzamide hydrochloride monohydrate), were compared on the DA receptor-mediated regulation of incertohypothalamic and nigrostriatal DA neurons. Both drugs produced dose- and time-related increases in concentrations of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) in the striatum, which contains the terminals of the nigrostriatal DA neurons. On the other hand, raclopride but not remoxipride increased concentrations of DOPAC in the medial zona incerta and dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus, regions that contains cell bodies and terminals, respectively, of incertohypothalamic DA neurons. These results suggest that raclopride blocks a population of DA receptors that regulates the activity of incertohypothalamic DA neurons, whereas remoxipride does not.     

Radioimmunoassay of plasma lisuride in man following intravenous and oral administration of lisuride hydrogen maleate; effect on plasma prolactin level

Summary The development of a sensitive radioimmunoassay for the determination of lisuride in plasma is described. The antiserum against lisuride-4-hemisuccinate-BSA was raised in rabbits. Using this method the plasma levels of lisuride were monitored following one intravenous (25 μg) and two oral (100 μg and 300 μg) doses of lisuride hydrogen maleate in three female and three male volunteers (intraindividual comparison). The plasma prolactin was also determined by radioimmunoassay. Following i. v. injection, the concentration of lisuride declined in three phases, with half-lives of 5 min, 25 min and 2 h. The total plasma clearance of 800±250 ml × min⁻¹ was in the range of “plasma flow” through the liver. In agreement with the high rate of biotransformation, the bioavailability of lisuride administered orally was 10%±7% of the 100-μg dose, and 22%±7% of the 300-μg dose. The plasma prolactin was lowered to 3%–18% of its pretreatment value depending on the route of administration and the dose. The reduction appeared to be short-lived and to be directly dependent on the plasma concentration of lisuride. Following intravenous injection, the prolactin level declined after a so far unexplained lagtime of 0.5 h.     

Haloperidol decanoate pharmacokinetics in red blood cells and plasma.

Red blood cell (RBC) and plasma concentrations of haloperidol (H) and reduced haloperidol (RH) were determined in nine patients (five men, four women) who had been receiving monthly injections of haloperidol decanoate (HD) for at least 3 months. A very sensitive high performance liquid chromatography method was used to measure H and RH, which could be detected at levels as low as 0.1 ng/ml. Blood samples for H and RH were drawn at the end of weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of a 4-week cycle. Monthly HD dosages ranged from 50 mg to 200 mg. At each time point RBC H did not differ significantly from plasma H. RBC RH and plasma RH did not change significantly over time and were consistently lower than RBC H and plasma H. However, RBC RH levels were higher than plasma RH levels. Also, the ratios of RBC RH/H were higher than were the ratios of plasma RH/H, which reflect an accumulation of RH intracellularly. HD dosage was highly correlated with both RBC H and plasma H, but RBC RH and plasma RH were not significantly related to dosage at any time point. Significant correlations were observed between HD dosage and prolactin concentration at week 1 and between prolactin concentration and RBC H and plasma H at weeks 1 and 4. Blood concentrations of H and RH and the corresponding standardized areas under the curve were not significantly related to smoking.     

Lack of effect of spiramycin on cyclosporin pharmacokinetics.

1. The influence of spiramycin coadministration on cyclosporin pharmacokinetics was studied in five renal transplant patients. The plasma concentrations of cyclosporin were measured both by non-specific radioimmunoassay (RIA) and high-performance liquid chromatography (h.p.l.c.). 2. The kinetics of cyclosporin were followed before treatment, and after 1 day and then 2 weeks of oral treatment with spiramycin (3 X 10(6) iu, twice daily). The main pharmacokinetic parameters (the area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve, the maximum plasma drug concentration and the time to reach it) obtained both by RIA and h.p.l.c. were not modified by spiramycin cotreatment after 1 day, nor after 2 weeks of spiramycin administration. Therefore, the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin (parent drug and parent drug plus metabolites) are not influenced by the coadministration of spiramycin macrolide at therapeutic dosage. 3. Spiramycin may be preferable to other macrolide antibiotics known to interact with cyclosporin such as erythromycin or josamycin.