Inequities in Access: How Utilization of Palliative Radiation Therapy in British Columbia Varies with Geography

PurposeReferral and utilization rates are important measures of the quality of service offered by hospitals and clinics, specifically in regard to access to appropriate care. This study measured referral rates and utilization rates for palliative radiation therapy (PRT) for the different health authorities in British Columbia (BC), Canada, to establish areas where there were variations in access.Methods and MaterialsIncident data was taken from the British Columbia Cancer registry between 1986 and 1999. Radiation therapy (RT) data were extracted between 1986 and 2005. The extra years were included to allow time for any disease progression that may have occurred. Referral rates were defined as the percentage of incident cases that had a consultation at the British Columbia Cancer Agency. The PRT utilization rate was defined as the percentage of incident cases receiving at least one course of palliative radiation therapy. Data were analysed for each of the 16 Health Service Delivery Areas in BC.ResultsSignificant geographical variations in both referral rates and utilization rates were identified. Generally, both referral rates and utilization rates were lower in areas where there is limited or difficult access to a cancer centre. After building a cancer centre in the Interior region of BC, both referral and utilization rates increased.InterpretationUtilization of palliative radiation varies depending on where people live. Access to RT is lower in remote geographical areas, implying a barrier to essential health care services. This seems to be related to lower referral rates in those areas.     

Sources of Palliative Care Knowledge Among Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Gynecologic Cancer

ContextA minority of patients with advanced or metastatic gynecologic cancer utilize palliative care and lack of knowledge may be a barrier to receiving palliative care services.ObjectivesTo identify sources used by patients with advanced or metastatic gynecologic cancer to learn about palliative care and evaluate for differences in knowledge about palliative care and palliative care utilization by knowledge source.MethodsPatients with gynecologic cancer receiving treatment for advanced or metastatic gynecologic cancer at a single academic medical center were surveyed about their awareness of and knowledge about palliative care. Medical chart review was conducted.ResultsOf the 111 women surveyed, 70 had heard of palliative care (63%). Sixty-eight specified from where they learned of palliative care: cancer care (n = 28; 41.2%), word of mouth (n = 26; 38.2%), work (n = 6; 8.8%), self-education (n = 4; 5.9%), personal experience (n = 2; 2.9%), or do not know (n = 2; 2.9%). Knowledge about palliative care (P = 0.35) and palliative care utilization (P = 0.81) did not differ by awareness of palliative care.ConclusionMost women receiving treatment for advanced gynecologic cancer have heard of palliative care from sources other than their cancer care providers. Knowledge about palliative care and source of knowledge about palliative care were not associated with palliative care utilization. Awareness of palliative care and palliative care utilization may be improved by increasing the low rate of health provider-based education and engaging cancer patients' social networks.     

Comparison of Rehabilitation Training at Different Timepoints to Restore Shoulder Function in Patients With Breast Cancer After Lymph Node Dissection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectiveTo investigate whether advancing the initiation of rehabilitation training compared with the time recommended by the guidelines after breast cancer (BC) surgery is beneficial to the recovery of shoulder function and quality of life.DesignProspective, observational, single center, randomized controlled trial.SettingThe study was conducted between September 2018 and December 2019, with a 12-week supervised intervention and 6-week home-exercise period concluding in May 2020.ParticipantsTwo hundred BC patients received axillary lymph node dissection (N=200).InterventionsParticipants were recruited and randomly allocated into 4 groups (A, B, C, and D). Group A started range of motion (ROM) training at 7 days postoperative and progressive resistance training (PRT) at 4 weeks postoperative; group B started ROM training at 7 days postoperative and PRT at 3 weeks postoperative; group C started ROM training at 3 days postoperative and PRT at 4 weeks postoperative; and group D started ROM training at 3 days postoperative and PRT at 3 weeks postoperative.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome measure was Constant-Murley Score. Secondary outcome measures included ROM, shoulder strength, grip, European Organization Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module (EORTC QLQ-BR23), and SF-36. Incidence of adverse reactions (drainage and pain) and complications (ecchymosis, subcutaneous hematoma, lymphedema) were also assessed.ResultsParticipants who started ROM training at 3 days postoperative obtained more benefits in mobility, shoulder function, and EORTC QLQ-BR23 score, while patients who started PRT at 3 weeks postoperative saw improvements in shoulder strength and SF-36. Incidence of adverse reactions and complications were low in all 4 groups, with no significant differences among the 4 groups.ConclusionsAdvancing ROM training initiation to 3 days postoperative or PRT to 3 weeks postoperative can better restore shoulder function after BC surgery and lead to faster quality of life improvement.     

Rural practice and the personal and educational characteristics of medical students: Survey of 1269 graduates of the University of Manitoba

ObjectiveTo describe the relationships between rural practice and the personal and medical education characteristics of medical students and residents.DesignCross-sectional, mailed survey.SettingManitoba.ParticipantsOf 2578 physician graduates of the University of Manitoba from 1965 to 2000 who were surveyed, 1269 (49%) responded.ResultsOf 1269 respondents, 39% had practised in rural settings, including 58% of the 362 respondents who identified family practice as their primary career activity, and 32% of the 907 respondents whose primary activities were other than family practice. For all graduates, being male (P = .0289), having lived in a rural community (P < .0001), having attended a rural high school (P < .0001), and having rural educational experiences during medical school (P = .0068) or during postgraduate training (P < .0001) were significantly related to a greater likelihood of rural practice. In the final multivariate model, graduates of rural high schools, compared with those from urban public schools, were 1.57 times (95% CI 1.09 to 2.26) more likely to have practised in rural settings. Graduates who undertook part of their undergraduate training in rural settings were 1.34 times (95% CI 1.09 to 1.75) more likely to practise in rural locations. For both undergraduates and residents, the distance of their rural education experiences from Winnipeg and the likelihood of rural practice were directly related. For both FPs and non-FPs, being male and undertaking rural education during residency training were associated with a greater likelihood of rural practice, as was the distance of the training experience from the urban setting. For non-FPs a similar association was observed with undergraduate rural experiences.ConclusionThis large survey of graduates from a Canadian medical school demonstrated that attending a rural high school (P < .0001) and having rural educational exposure during medical school and residency training (P = .0068) were significantly associated with a physician practising in a rural location. That is, rural educational experiences on the continuum from high school through residency training appeared to be associated with rural practice.     

Rural nurses’ self-rated knowledge and skills in pain,medication, symptom and emergency management in community-based palliative care: A cross-sectional survey

BackgroundThe assessment and management of pain and symptoms in community-based palliative care patients is a measure of quality in palliative care to indicate the quality of palliative care. Studies have identified rural community-based nurses are not always confident in this area of practice.AimTo identify rural community-based nurses’ strengths and gaps in palliative care knowledge and skills regarding pain, symptom and emergency management and to determine correlates of deficient knowledge.MethodsA cross-sectional study design was used. An electronic questionnaire was emailed to 165 community-based nurses in Gippsland, Australia. Participants rated their palliative care knowledge/skills on a five-point Likert scale ranging from ‘No knowledge’ (1) to ‘Can teach others’ (5) on the following topics: pain (2 items), medication (14 items), symptoms (26 items), palliative care emergencies (12 items) and assessment tools (2 items). For each item classified as a gap or consolidation, associations between nurse characteristics and no/basic knowledge were assessed using univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression.FindingsOverall, 122 nurses (response rate = 74%) completed the questionnaire. Seventy-one percent of items were identified as practice strengths. Strengths included pain (2/2), medication management (11/14), and symptom management (22/25). Twenty-nine percent of items were identified as gaps and consolidations. Gaps and consolidations related to management of opioid medications, symptom management of delirium, and the recognition and management of rare emergency situations within palliative care.DiscussionThis study found that lack of experience and formal training in palliative care were associated with gaps in knowledge.ConclusionThis study found that lack of experience and formal training in palliative care were associated with gaps in knowledge. Targeted interventions such as training and peer mentoring have the potential to address identified gaps in rural community-based nurses... palliative care knowledge/skills and, ultimately, improve the care of palliative patients.     

Pain intensity, quality of life, quality of palliative care, and satisfaction in outpatients with metastatic or recurrent cancer: a Japanese, nationwide, region-based, multicenter survey

ContextIncreasing numbers of patients with advanced cancer are receiving anticancer and/or palliative treatment in outpatient settings, and palliative care for outpatients with advanced cancer is being recognized as one of the most important areas for comprehensive cancer treatment.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate pain intensity, quality of life, quality of palliative care, and satisfaction reported by outpatients with advanced cancer.MethodsQuestionnaires were sent to 1493 consecutive outpatients with metastatic or recurrent cancer from four regions in Japan; 859 responses were analyzed (58%). Questionnaires included the Brief Pain Inventory, Good Death Inventory, Care Evaluation Scale, and a six-point satisfaction scale.ResultsApproximately 20% of the patients reported moderate to severe pain. Whereas more than 70% agreed or strongly agreed with “good relationship with medical staff” and “being respected as an individual,” less than 60% agreed or strongly agreed with “free from physical distress,” “free from emotional distress,” “maintaining hope,” and “fulfillment at life’s completion”; 54% reported some agreement with “feel a burden to others.” About 20% reported that improvement is necessary in physical care by physicians, physical care by nurses, psycho-existential care, help with decision making, and coordination/consistency of care; 13% reported some levels of dissatisfaction.ConclusionA considerable number of outpatients with metastatic or recurrent cancer experienced pain, physical symptoms, emotional distress, and existential suffering, and advocated improvements in palliative care across multiple areas.     

Perceptions of nurses towards oral health in palliative care: A qualitative study

BackgroundOral health problems among people receiving palliative care are common and can significantly affect quality of life. Nurses are at the frontline of palliative care in Australia. However, how optimal oral health care is addressed in clinical practice by palliative nurses is not known.AimTo explore the perceptions of nurses working in Australian palliative care settings to determine the acceptability, challenges and recommendations that need to be considered to develop and implement an oral health care model in palliative care settings.MethodsTwo focus groups were conducted with community (n = 8) and inpatient nurses (n = 10) working in urban palliative care settings.FindingsFour main themes were developed through consensus: 1) Oral health is important in the palliative care setting; 2) Additional training could enhance what nurses already do; 3) Barriers to receiving oral care: a structural issue; 4) Exploring alternative pathways to dental services.DiscussionNurses recognised the importance of oral health in palliative care; however, the paucity of set protocols based on existing guidelines meant that oral care was often unstructured. Systemic factors reduced the number of available options for people receiving palliative care to access professional dental treatment. Although alternative solutions, including teledentistry services, were explored, there were some constraints.ConclusionA palliative care oral health model of care would need to integrate existing formal guidelines into a comprehensive framework specific for palliative care nurses and develop palliative care oral health training for them taking into consideration existing barriers for people to receive professional dental treatment.     

Palliative Care Challenges in Nigeria: A qualitative study of interprofessional perceptions

ContextPalliative care awareness, education and practice vary widely across global health systems, especially throughout low- and middle-income countries such as Nigeria. Unfortunately, qualitative investigations into the context, experiences and challenges of Nigerian health care professionals providing palliative care in these settings are still underrepresented in the literature.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to better understand the perceptions of palliative care providers in Nigeria.MethodsThe authors conducted an online survey of health professionals caring for patients with palliative care and end of life needs. Survey participants were recruited via convenience sampling from a palliative care training program in Lagos, Nigeria.Results27 palliative care program participants (12 physicians, seven nurses, four pharmacists, two psychiatrists and two physiotherapists) responded to the two-question survey. 39 free text responses were collected and analyzed. A majority (33%, n = 13) of responses reported challenges associated with caring for patients with cancer. Suboptimal pain management was the second most common response type (18%, n = 7). Other significant responses included caring for patients with comorbidities (13%, n = 5), patients seeking spiritual care (8%, n = 3) and patients who were unable to afford standard treatment (5%, n = 2). Uncategorized responses (23%, n = 9) included experiences caring for patients with injuries sustained in military operations and COVID-19, among others.ConclusionThese results provide valuable insights into the palliative care experiences and challenges of an interdisciplinary set of health care practitioners providing palliative care in Nigeria. Further research is needed to elucidate the facilitators and barriers of delivering palliative care in similar settings.     

A Palliative Radiation Oncology Consult Service Reduces Total Costs During Hospitalization

Context

Palliative radiation therapy (PRT) is a highly effective treatment in alleviating symptoms from bone metastases; however, currently used standard fractionation schedules can lead to costly care, especially when patients are treated in an inpatient setting. The Palliative Radiation Oncology Consult (PROC) service was developed in 2013 to improve appropriateness, timeliness, and care value from PRT.

Family physicians who have focused practices in oncology: Results of a national survey

Objective

To characterize the demographic characteristics, practice profile, and current work life of general practitioners in oncology (GPOs) for the first time.

Design

National Web survey performed in March 2011.

Setting

Canada.

Participants

Members of the national GPO organization. Respondents were asked to forward the survey to non-member colleagues.

Main outcome measures

Profile of work as GPOs and in other medical roles, training received, demographic characteristics, and professional satisfaction.

Results

The response rate was 73.3% for members of the Canadian Association of General Practitioners in Oncology; overall, 120 surveys were completed. Respondents worked in similar proportions in small and larger communities. About 60% of them had participated in formal training programs. Most respondents worked part-time as GPOs and also worked in other medical roles, particularly palliative care, primary care practice, teaching, and hospital work. More GPOs from cities with populations of greater than 100 000 worked solely as GPOs than those from smaller communities (P = .0057). General practitioners in oncology played a variety of roles in the cancer care system, particularly in systemic therapy, palliative care, inpatient care, and teaching. As a group, more than half of respondents were involved in the care of each of the 11 common cancer types. Overall, 87.8% of respondents worked in outpatient care, 59.1% provided inpatient care, and 33.0% provided on-call services; 92.8% were satisfied with their work as GPOs.

Conclusion

General practitioners in oncology are involved in all cancer care settings and usually combine this work with other roles, particularly with palliative care in rural Canada. Training is inconsistent but initiatives are under way to address this. Job satisfaction is better than that of Canadian FPs in general. As generalists, FPs bring a valuable skill set to their work as GPOs in the cancer care system.     

Improving access to specialist multidisciplinary palliative care consultation for rural cancer patients by videoconferencing: report of a pilot project

Purpose

Palliative care (PC) and palliative radiotherapy (RT) consultation are integral to the care of patients with advanced cancer. These services are not universally available in rural areas, and travel to urban centers to access them can be burdensome for patients and families. The objectives of our study were to assess the feasibility of using videoconferencing to provide specialist multidisciplinary PC and palliative RT consultation to cancer patients in rural areas and to explore symptom, cost, and satisfaction outcomes.

Methods

The Virtual Pain and Symptom Control and Palliative Radiotherapy Clinic was piloted from January 2008 to March 2011. Cancer patients in rural northern Alberta attended local telehealth facilities, accompanied by nurses trained in symptom assessment. The multidisciplinary team at the Cross Cancer Institute in Edmonton was linked by videoconference. Team recommendations were sent to the patients’ family physicians. Data were collected on referral, clinical, and consultation characteristics and symptom, cost, and satisfaction outcomes.

Results

Forty-four initial consultation and 28 follow-up visits took place. Mean Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale scores for anxiety and appetite were statistically significantly improved at the first follow-up visit (p?<?0.01 and p?=?0.03, respectively). Average per visit savings for patients seen by telehealth versus attending the CCI were 471.13 km, 7.96 hours, and Cdn $192.71, respectively. Patients and referring physicians indicated a high degree of satisfaction with the clinic.

Conclusion

Delivery of specialist multidisciplinary PC consultation by videoconferencing is feasible, may improve symptoms, results in cost savings to patients and families, and is satisfactory to users.     

Urban and rural differences in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Ireland

BackgroundMore than a third of Ireland's population lives in a rural area, defined as the population residing in all areas outside clusters of 1500 or more inhabitants. This presents a challenge for the provision of effective pre-hospital resuscitation services. In 2012, Ireland became one of three European countries with nationwide Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) register coverage. An OHCA register provides an ability to monitor quality and equity of access to life-saving services in Irish communities.AimTo use the first year of national OHCAR data to assess differences in the occurrence, incidence and outcomes of OHCA where resuscitation is attempted and the incident is attended by statutory Emergency Medical Services between rural and urban settings.MethodsThe geographical coordinates of incident locations were identified and co-ordinates were then classified as ‘urban’ or ‘rural’ according to the Irish Central Statistics Office (CSO) definition.Results1798 OHCA incidents were recorded which were attended by statutory Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and where resuscitation was attempted. There was a higher percentage of male patients in rural settings (71% vs. 65%; p = 0.009) but the incidence of male patients did not differ significantly between urban and rural settings (26 vs. 25 males/100,000 population/year p = 0.353). A higher proportion of rural patients received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (B-CPR) 70% vs. 55% (p ≤ 0.001), and had defibrillation attempted before statutory EMS arrival (7% vs. 4% (p = 0.019), respectively). Urban patients were more likely to receive a statutory EMS response in 8 min or less (33% vs. 9%; p ≤ 0.001). Urban patients were also more likely to be discharged alive from hospital (6% vs. 3%; p = 0.006) (incidence 2.5 vs. 1.1/100,000 population/year; p ≤ 0.001).Multivariable analysis of survival showed that the main variable of interest i.e. urban vs. rural setting was also independently associated with discharge from hospital alive (OR 3.23 (95% CI 1.43–7.31)).ConclusionThere are significant disparities in the incidence of resuscitation attempts in urban and rural areas. There are challenges in the provision of services and subsequent outcomes from OHCA that occur outside of urban areas requiring novel and innovative solutions. An integrated community response system is necessary to improve metrics around OHCA response and outcomes in rural areas.