Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist: a ventilation tool or a ventilation toy?

Mechanical ventilation has, since its introduction into clinical practice, undergone a major evolution from controlled ventilation to various modes of assisted ventilation. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is the newest development. The implementation of NAVA requires the introduction of a catheter to measure the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EA(di)). NAVA relies, opposite to conventional assisted ventilation modes, on the EA(di) to trigger the ventilator breath and to adjust the ventilatory assist to the neural drive. The amplitude of the ventilator assist is determined by the instantaneous EA(di) and the NAVA level set by the clinician. The NAVA level amplifies the EA(di) signal and determines instantaneous ventilator assist on a breath-to-breath basis. Experimental and clinical data suggest superior patient-ventilator synchrony with NAVA. Patient-ventilator asynchrony is present in 25% of mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit and may contribute to patient discomfort, sleep fragmentation, higher use of sedation, development of delirium, ventilator-induced lung injury, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and ultimately mortality. With NAVA, the reliance on the EA(di) signal, together with an intact ventilatory drive and intact breathing reflexes, allows integration of the ventilator in the neuro-ventilatory coupling on a higher level than conventional ventilation modes. The simple monitoring of the EA(di) signal alone may provide the clinician with important information to guide ventilator management, especially during the weaning process. Although, until now, little evidence proves the superiority of NAVA on clinically relevant end points, it seems evident that patient populations (eg, COPD and small children) with major patient-ventilator asynchrony may benefit from this new ventilatory tool.     

Assisted breathing is better in acute respiratory failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mechanical ventilation is usually provided in acute lung injury to ensure alveolar ventilation and reduce the patients' work of breathing without further damaging the lungs by the treatment itself. Although partial ventilatory support modalities were initially developed for weaning from mechanical ventilation, they are increasingly used as primary modes of ventilation, even in patients in the acute phase of pulmonary dysfunction. The aim of this paper is to review the role of spontaneous breathing ventilatory modalities with respect to their physiologic or clinical evidence. RECENT FINDINGS: By allowing patients with acute lung injury to breathe spontaneously, one can expect improvement in gas exchange and in systemic blood flow, on the basis of both experimental and clinical trials. In addition, by increasing end-expiratory lung volume, as will occur when airway pressure release ventilation is used, recruitment of collapsed or consolidated lung is likely to occur, especially in juxtadiaphragmatic lung regions. Until recently, traditional approaches to mechanical ventilatory support of patients with acute lung injury have called for adaptation of the patient to the mechanical ventilator using heavy sedation and administration of neuromuscular blocking agents. Recent investigations have questioned the utility of sedation, muscle paralysis, and mechanical control of ventilation. Further, evidence exists that lowering sedation levels will decrease the duration of mechanical ventilatory support, the length of stay in the intensive care unit, and the overall costs of hospitalization. SUMMARY: On the basis of currently available data, the authors suggest the use of techniques of mechanical ventilatory support that maintain, rather than suppress, spontaneous ventilatory effort, especially in patients with severe pulmonary dysfunction.     

Clinical review: Biphasic positive airway pressure and airway pressure release ventilation

This review focuses on mechanical ventilation strategies that allow unsupported spontaneous breathing activity in any phase of the ventilatory cycle. By allowing patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome to breathe spontaneously, one can expect improvements in gas exchange and systemic blood flow, based on findings from both experimental and clinical trials. In addition, by increasing end-expiratory lung volume, as occurs when using biphasic positive airway pressure or airway pressure release ventilation, recruitment of collapsed or consolidated lung is likely to occur, especially in juxtadiaphragmatic lung legions. Traditional approaches to mechanical ventilatory support of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome require adaptation of the patient to the mechanical ventilator using heavy sedation and even muscle relaxation. Recent investigations have questioned the utility of sedation, muscle paralysis and mechanical control of ventilation. Furthermore, evidence exists that lowering sedation levels will decrease the duration of mechanical ventilatory support, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and overall costs of hospitalization. Based on currently available data, we suggest considering the use of techniques of mechanical ventilatory support that maintain, rather than suppress, spontaneous ventilatory effort, especially in patients with severe pulmonary dysfunction.     

Assisted spontaneous breathing during early acute lung injury

In the early phase of their disease process, patients with acute lung injury are often ventilated with strategies that control the tidal volume or airway pressure, while modes employing spontaneous breathing are applied later to wean the patient from the ventilator. Spontaneous breathing modes may integrate intrinsic feedback mechanisms that should help prevent ventilator-induced lung injury, and should improve synchrony between the ventilator and the patient's demand. Airway pressure release ventilation with spontaneous breathing was shown to decrease cyclic collapse/recruitment of dependent, juxtadiaphragmatic lung areas compared with airway pressure release ventilation without spontaneous breathing. Combined with previous data demonstrating improved cardiorespiratory variables, airway pressure release ventilation with spontaneous breathing may turn out to be a less injurious ventilatory strategy.     

Assisted spontaneous breathing during early acute lung injury

In the early phase of their disease process, patients with acute lung injury are often ventilated with strategies that control the tidal volume or airway pressure, while modes employing spontaneous breathing are applied later to wean the patient from the ventilator. Spontaneous breathing modes may integrate intrinsic feedback mechanisms that should help prevent ventilator-induced lung injury, and should improve synchrony between the ventilator and the patient's demand. Airway pressure release ventilation with spontaneous breathing was shown to decrease cyclic collapse/recruitment of dependent, juxtadiaphragmatic lung areas compared with airway pressure release ventilation without spontaneous breathing. Combined with previous data demonstrating improved cardiorespiratory variables, airway pressure release ventilation with spontaneous breathing may turn out to be a less injurious ventilatory strategy.     

Evidence-based ventilator weaning and discontinuation

Ventilator management of a patient who is recovering from acute respiratory failure must balance competing objectives. Discontinuing mechanical ventilation and removing the artificial airway as soon as possible reduces the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury, nosocomial pneumonia, airway trauma from the endotracheal tube, and unnecessary sedation, but premature ventilator-discontinuation or extubation can cause ventilatory muscle fatigue, gas exchange failure, and loss of airway protection. In 1999 the McMaster University Outcomes Research Unit conducted a comprehensive evidence-based review of the literature on ventilator-discontinuation. Using that literature review, the American College of Chest Physicians, the Society of Critical Care Medicine, and the American Association for Respiratory Care created evidence-based guidelines, which include the following principles: 1. Frequent assessment is required to determine whether ventilatory support and the artificial airway are still needed. 2. Patients who continue to require support should be continually re-evaluated to assure that all factors contributing to ventilator dependence are addressed. 3. With patients who continue to require support, the support strategy should maximize patient comfort and provide muscle unloading. 4. Patients who require prolonged ventilatory support beyond the intensive care unit should go to specialized facilities that can provide more gradual support reduction strategies. 5. Ventilator-discontinuation and weaning protocols can be effectively carried out by nonphysician clinicians.     

Ventilator strategies for posttraumatic acute respiratory distress syndrome: airway pressure release ventilation and the role of spontaneous breathing in critically ill patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients who experience severe trauma are at increased risk for the development of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The management strategies used to treat respiratory failure in this patient population should be comprehensive. Current trends in the management of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome consist of maintaining acceptable gas exchange while limiting ventilator-associated lung injury. RECENT FINDINGS: Currently, two distinct forms of ventilator-associated lung injury are recognized to produce alveolar stress failure and have been termed low-volume lung injury (intratidal alveolar recruitment and derecruitment) and high-volume lung injury (alveolar stretch and overdistension). Pathologically, alveolar stress failure from low- and high-volume ventilation can produce lung injury in animal models and is termed ventilator-induced lung injury. The management goal in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome challenges clinicians to achieve the optimal balance that both limits the forms of alveolar stress failure and maintains effective gas exchange. The integration of new ventilator modes that include the augmentation of spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation may be beneficial and may improve the ability to attain these goals. SUMMARY: Airway pressure release ventilation is a mode of mechanical ventilation that maintains lung volume to limit intra tidal recruitment /derecruitment and improves gas exchange while limiting over distension. Clinical and experimental data demonstrate improvements in arterial oxygenation, ventilation-perfusion matching (less shunt and dead space ventilation), cardiac output, oxygen delivery, and lower airway pressures during airway pressure release ventilation. Mechanical ventilation with airway pressure release ventilation permits spontaneous breathing throughout the entire respiratory cycle, improves patient comfort, reduces the use of sedation, and may reduce ventilator days.     

Volume-guaranteed pressure-support ventilation facing acute changes in ventilatory demand

Objective To compare volume support ventilation (VSV) in which the pressure support level is continuously adjusted to deliver a preset tidal volume, with pressure support ventilation (PSV), in terms of patient behavior and ventilator response when ventilatory demand was increased by addition of dead space to the circuit.Design and setting Randomized cross-over study in an intensive care unit university hospital.Interventions We assessed in ten patients being weaned off mechanical ventilation the effect of increasing the ventilatory demand by adding a heat-and-moisture exchanger to augment the dead space with a fixed level of PSV and VSV.Measurements and results Arterial blood gases, breathing pattern, and respiratory effort parameters at the end of each of the four steps. Adding dead space significantly increased minute ventilation and PaCO₂ values with both PSV and VSV. Indexes of respiratory effort (pressure-time index of respiratory muscles and work of breathing) increased with both ventilatory modes after dead-space augmentation. This increase was 2.5–4 times with VSV than with PSV and induced overt respiratory distress in two patients. The assistance delivered during VSV decreased significantly after dead-space augmentation, from 15.0±6.5 to 9.1±4.8 cmH₂O, whereas no change occurred with PSV.Conclusions With a fixed level of VSV, but not of PSV, an increase in ventilatory demand results in a decrease in the pressure support provided by the ventilator, opposite to the desired response. VSV may conceivably result in respiratory distress in clinical settings.Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available for this article if you access the article at . A link in the frame on the left on that page takes you directly to the supplementary material.     

Chest wall mechanics during pressure support ventilation

Introduction  

During pressure support ventilation (PSV) a part of the breathing pattern is controlled by the patient, and synchronization of respiratory muscle action and the resulting chest wall kinematics is a valid indicator of the patient's adaptation to the ventilator. The aim of the present study was to analyze the effects of different PSV settings on ventilatory pattern, total and compartmental chest wall kinematics and dynamics, muscle pressures and work of breathing in patients with acute lung injury.     

The impact of spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, controlled mechanical ventilation is generally used in the initial phase to ensure adequate alveolar ventilation, arterial oxygenation, and to reduce work of breathing without causing further damage to the lungs. Although introduced as weaning techniques, partial ventilator support modes have become standard techniques for primary mechanical ventilator support. This review evaluates the physiological and clinical effects of persisting spontaneous breathing during ventilator support in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. RECENT FINDINGS: The improvements in pulmonary gas exchange, systemic blood flow and oxygen supply to the tissue which have been observed when spontaneous breathing has been maintained during mechanical ventilation are reflected in the clinical improvement in the patient's condition. Computer tomography observations demonstrated that spontaneous breathing improves gas exchange by redistribution of ventilation and end-expiratory gas to dependent, juxtadiaphragmatic lung regions and thereby promotes alveolar recruitment. Thus, spontaneous breathing during ventilator support counters the undesirable cyclic alveolar collapse in dependent lung regions. In addition, spontaneous breathing during ventilator support may prevent increase in sedation beyond a level of comfort to adapt the patient to mechanical ventilation which decreases duration of mechanical ventilator support, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and overall costs of care giving. SUMMARY: In view of the recently available data, it can be concluded that maintained spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation should not be suppressed even in patients with severe pulmonary functional disorders.     

The role of the nurse in mechanical ventilation

Many patients admitted onto the intensive care unit (ICU) require airway maintenance and mechanical ventilator support (Cook et al, 2011). It is important that all qualified nurses working in critical care environments understand the indications for the use of mechanical ventilation, the modes of ventilation delivery, and the most common associated complications. Mechanical ventilators assist the movement of gases (air) into and out of a patient's lungs, while minimizing the effort of breathing (Scholz et al, 2011). Indicators for the use of mechanical ventilation include the maintenance of oxygenation, the management of type?I reparatory failure, the removal of carbon dioxide, the management of type?II respiratory failure, cardiorespiratory arrest and central nervous system depression (Oh et al, 2008).     

Mechanical ventilation of the premature neonate

Although the trend in the neonatal intensive care unit is to use noninvasive ventilation whenever possible, invasive ventilation is still often necessary for supporting pre-term neonates with lung disease. Many different ventilation modes and ventilation strategies are available to assist with the optimization of mechanical ventilation and prevention of ventilator-induced lung injury. Patient-triggered ventilation is favored over machine-triggered forms of invasive ventilation for improving gas exchange and patient-ventilator interaction. However, no studies have shown that patient-triggered ventilation improves mortality or morbidity in premature neonates. A promising new form of patient-triggered ventilation, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), was recently FDA approved for invasive and noninvasive ventilation. Clinical trials are underway to evaluate outcomes in neonates who receive NAVA. New evidence suggests that volume-targeted ventilation modes (ie, volume control or pressure control with adaptive targeting) may provide better lung protection than traditional pressure control modes. Several volume-targeted modes that provide accurate tidal volume delivery in the face of a large endotracheal tube leak were recently introduced to the clinical setting. There is ongoing debate about whether neonates should be managed invasively with high-frequency ventilation or conventional ventilation at birth. The majority of clinical trials performed to date have compared high-frequency ventilation to pressure control modes. Future trials with premature neonates should compare high-frequency ventilation to conventional ventilation with volume-targeted modes. Over the last decade many new promising approaches to lung-protective ventilation have evolved. The key to protecting the neonatal lung during mechanical ventilation is optimizing lung volume and limiting excessive lung expansion, by applying appropriate PEEP and using shorter inspiratory time, smaller tidal volume (4-6 mL/kg), and permissive hypercapnia. This paper reviews new and established neonatal ventilation modes and strategies and evaluates their impact on neonatal outcomes.     

In vivo physiologic comparison of two ventilators used for domiciliary ventilation in children with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: Home noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) is used with increasing frequency for the treatment of patients with respiratory failure caused by cystic fibrosis, yet the optimal mode of ventilation in such children is unknown. We compared the physiologic short-term effects of two ventilators with different modes (one pressure support and the other assist control/volume-targeted [AC/VT]) commonly used for domiciliary ventilation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, crossover comparison of two ventilators with different modes. SETTING: Tertiary pediatric university hospital. PATIENTS: Eight children with cystic fibrosis (age, 11-17 yrs) and chronic respiratory failure (pH 7.4 +/- 0.0; PaO2, 57.5 +/- 7.5 torr; PaCO2, 46.1 +/- 2.5 torr), naive to NIMV. INTERVENTIONS: Two 20-min runs of pressure support and AC/VT ventilation were performed in random order, each run being preceded and followed by 20 mins of spontaneous breathing. MEASUREMENTS: Flow and airway pressure and esophageal and gastric pressures were measured to calculate esophageal (PTPes) and diaphragmatic pressure-time product (PTPdi) and the work of breathing. RESULTS: The two NIMV sessions significantly improved blood gas variables and increased tidal volume with no change in respiratory rate. Indexes of respiratory effort decreased significantly during the two modes of NIMV compared with spontaneous breathing, with PTPdi/min decreasing from 497.8 +/- 115.4 cm H2O x sec x min(-1) during spontaneous breathing to 127.8 +/- 98.3 cm H2O x sec x min(-1) and 184.3 +/- 79.8 cm H2O x sec x min(-1), during AC/VT and pressure support, respectively (p <.0001), and the work of breathing decreasing from 1.83 +/- 0.12 J.L-1 during spontaneous breathing to 0.48 +/- 0.32 J.L-1 and 0.75 +/- 0.30 J.L-1, during AC/VT and pressure support, respectively (p <.0001). In addition, the effect of AC/VT ventilation was significantly superior to pressure support judged by PTPes and the work of breathing, but this result was explained by three patients who adapted extremely well to the AC/VT ventilation, with the disappearance of ventilator triggering, in effect adopting a controlled mode. There was a correlation between the improvement in PTPdi/min or the work of breathing and patient's subjective impression of comfort during the AC/VT ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: In awake, stable children with cystic fibrosis, both AC/VT and pressure support unloaded the respiratory muscles. The disappearance of ventilator triggering occurred in a subgroup of patients during AC/VT ventilation, and this explained the good tolerance and the superiority of this mode in the present study.     

Patient-ventilator interactions during partial ventilatory support: a preliminary study comparing the effects of adaptive support ventilation with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation plus inspiratory pressure support

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of adaptive support ventilation (ASV) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation plus pressure support (SIMV-PS) on patient-ventilator interactions in patients undergoing partial ventilatory support. DESIGN: Prospective, crossover interventional study. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit, university tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Ten patients, intubated and mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure of diverse causes, in the early weaning period, ventilated with SIMV-PS and clinically detectable sternocleidomastoid activity suggesting increased inspiratory load and patient-ventilator dyssynchrony. INTERVENTIONS: Measurement of respiratory mechanics, P0.1, sternocleidomastoid electromyographic activity, arterial blood gases, and systemic hemodynamics in three conditions: 1) after 45 mins with SIMV-PS (SIMV-PS 1); 2) after 45 mins with ASV, set to deliver the same minute-ventilation as during SIMV-PS; 3) 45 mins after return to SIMV-PS (SIMV-PS 2), with settings identical to those of the first SIMV-PS period. MAIN RESULTS: The same minute ventilation was observed during ASV (11.4 +/- 3.1 l/min [mean +/- sd]) as during SIMV-PS 1 (11.6 +/- 3.5 L/min) and SIMV-PS 2 (10.8 +/- 3.4 L/min). No parameter was significantly different between SIMV-PS 1 and 2, hence subsequent results refer to ASV vs. SIMV-PS 1. During ASV, tidal volume increased (538 +/- 91 vs. 671 +/- 100 mL, p <.05) and total respiratory rate decreased (22 +/- 7 vs. 17 +/- 3 breaths/min, p <.05) vs. SIMV-PS. However, spontaneous respiratory rate increased in six patients, decreased in four, and remained unchanged in one. P0.1 decreased during ASV in all patients except three in whom no change was noted (1.8 +/- 0.9 vs. 1.1 +/- 1 cm H2O, p <.05). During ASV, sternocleidomastoid electromyogram activity was markedly reduced (electromyogram index, where SIMV-PS 1 = 100, ASV 34 +/- 41, SIMV-PS 2 89 +/- 36, p <.02) as was palpable muscle activity. No changes were noted in arterial blood gases, pH, or mean systemic pressure during the trial. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing partial ventilatory support, with clinical and electromyographic signs of increased respiratory muscle loading, ASV provided levels of minute ventilation comparable to those of SIMV-PS. However, with ASV, central respiratory drive and sternocleidomastoid activity were markedly reduced, suggesting decreased inspiratory load and improved patient-ventilator interactions. These preliminary results warrant further testing of ASV for partial ventilatory support.     

Clinical review: Update on neurally adjusted ventilatory assist - report of a round-table conference

ABSTRACT: Conventional mechanical ventilators rely on pneumatic pressure and flow sensors and controllers to detect breaths. New modes of mechanical ventilation have been developed to better match the assistance delivered by the ventilator to the patient's needs. Among these modes, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) delivers a pressure that is directly proportional to the integral of the electrical activity of the diaphragm recorded continuously through an esophageal probe. In clinical settings, NAVA has been chiefly compared with pressure-support ventilation, one of the most popular modes used during the weaning phase, which delivers a constant pressure from breath to breath. Comparisons with proportional-assist ventilation, which has numerous similarities, are lacking. Because of the constant level of assistance, pressure-support ventilation reduces the natural variability of the breathing pattern and can be associated with asynchrony and/or overinflation. The ability of NAVA to circumvent these limitations has been addressed in clinical studies and is discussed in this report. Although the underlying concept is fascinating, several important questions regarding the clinical applications of NAVA remain unanswered. Among these questions, determining the optimal NAVA settings according to the patient's ventilatory needs and/or acceptable level of work of breathing is a key issue. In this report, based on an investigator-initiated round table, we review the most recent literature on this topic and discuss the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of NAVA compared with other modes, as well as the risks and limitations of NAVA.     

Mechanical ventilation: let us minimize sleep disturbances

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides a background in mechanical ventilation and sleep. RECENT FINDINGS: Sleep pattern in mechanically ventilated patients differs largely from physiological sleep. The ventilatory mode and the ventilatory settings could have an influence on the sleep quality and quantity. Pressure support ventilation can increase the sleep fragmentation and decrease the sleep quantity, due to central apneas when compared with assist control ventilation. An excessive level of ventilatory assistance during sleep promotes central apneas and ineffective efforts. These two respiratory events can trigger arousals and awakenings, thus altering the sleep quality and quantity in mechanically ventilated patients. Ventilatory settings adjusted according to the patient's effort during pressure support allow reducing the number of ineffective efforts and improve sleep quality when compared with a clinical adjustment. A physiological approach to set the ventilator and the ventilatory mode may improve sleep quality and quantity. SUMMARY: Minimizing the sleep alterations in mechanically ventilated patients could be obtained by setting the ventilator in such a way to avoid hyperventilation during the sleep stage. The impact of sleep derangements in patient outcomes is, however, unknown.     

Advanced modes of mechanical ventilation: implications for practice

Mechanical ventilation is one of the most commonly applied interventions in intensive care units. Despite its life-saving role, mechanical ventilation is associated with additional risks to the patient and additional healthcare costs if not applied appropriately. To decrease risk, new ventilator modes continue to be developed with the goal of improving patient outcomes. Advances in ventilator modes include dual control modes that enable guaranteed tidal volume and inspiratory pressure, pressure-style modes that permit spontaneous breathing at high- and low-pressure levels, and closed-loop systems that facilitate ventilator manipulation of variables based on measured respiratory parameters. Clinicians need to develop a thorough understanding of these modes including their effects on underlying respiratory physiology to be able to deliver safe and appropriate patient care.     

Automatic selection of breathing pattern using adaptive support ventilation

OBJECTIVE: In a cohort of mechanically ventilated patients to compare the automatic tidal volume (VT)-respiratory rate (RR) combination generated by adaptive support ventilation (ASV) for various lung conditions. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational cohort study in the 11-bed medicosurgical ICU of a general hospital. PATIENTS: 243 patients receiving 1327 days of invasive ventilation on ASV. MEASUREMENTS: Daily collection of ventilator settings, breathing pattern, arterial blood gases, and underlying clinical respiratory conditions categorized as: normal lungs, ALI/ARDS, COPD, chest wall stiffness, or acute respiratory failure. RESULTS: Overall the respiratory mechanics differed significantly with the underlying conditions. In passive patients ASV delivered different VT-RR combinations based on the underlying condition, providing higher VT and lower RR in COPD than in ALI/ARDS: 9.3ml/kg (8.2-10.8) predicted body weight (PBW) and 13 breaths/min (11-16) vs. 7.6ml/kg (6.7-8.8) PBW and 18 breaths/min (16-22). In patients actively triggering the ventilator the VT-RR combinations did not differ between COPD, ALI/ARDS, and normal lungs. CONCLUSIONS: ASV selects different VT-RR combinations based on respiratory mechanics in passive, mechanically ventilated patients.     

Automatic tube compensation in patients after cardiac surgery: effects on oxygen consumption and breathing pattern

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients without prior pulmonary disease after cardiac surgery and to determine whether resistive unloading by automatic tube compensation, pressure support ventilation, and continuous positive airway pressure has different effects on oxygen consumption, breathing pattern, gas exchange, and hemodynamics. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Tertiary care, postoperative intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Twenty-one patients scheduled for open heart coronary artery bypass graft surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Each patient was ventilated with all three modes in random order. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were ventilated in three modes, each applied for 30 mins according to computer-generated randomization: pressure support ventilation with 5 cm H2O, continuous positive airway pressure, and automatic tube compensation. Oxygen consumption was calculated by means of indirect calorimetry. The hypnotic state of the patients was monitored by Bispectral Index. For hemodynamic measurements, a fiberoptic pulmonary artery catheter was inserted. The main finding of our study was that oxygen consumption and breathing pattern (tidal volume and respiratory rate) did not differ significantly during automatic tube compensation and pressure support ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure (oxygen consumption, 170 +/- 29 vs. 170 +/- 26 vs. 174 +/- 29 mL.min.m, respectively; tidal volume, 466 +/- 132 vs. 484 +/- 125 vs. 470 +/- 119 mL, respectively; respiratory rate, 16 +/- 4 vs. 15 +/- 4 vs. 16 +/- 4 breaths/min, respectively). Automatic tube compensation and pressure support ventilation had no clinical effects on gas exchange and hemodynamic variables compared with continuous positive airway pressure. None of the variables differed significantly during the three ventilatory settings. CONCLUSION: In postoperative tracheally intubated patients with normal ventilatory demand, automatic tube compensation and pressure support ventilation with 5 cm H2O lead to identical oxygen consumption, breathing patterns, gas exchange, and hemodynamics. We, therefore, suggest that this group of patients does not need any additional positive pressure support from the ventilator to overcome the additional work of breathing imposed by the endotracheal tube during the weaning phase from mechanical ventilation.     

The comfort of breathing: a study with volunteers assessing the influence of various modes of assisted ventilation

OBJECTIVE: To assess the subjective feeling of comfort of healthy volunteers breathing on various modes of ventilation used in intensive care. DESIGN: A randomized, prospective, double-blinded, crossover trial using volunteers. SETTING: An intensive care unit (ICU) in a teaching hospital. INTERVENTIONS: We compared, by using healthy volunteers, the subjective feeling of comfort of three modes of ventilation used during the weaning phase of critical illness. We used healthy volunteers to avoid other distracting influences of intensive care that may confound the primary feeling of comfort. The modes we compared were synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation, assisted spontaneous breathing, and biphasic positive airway pressure. The imposed ventilation was comparable with 50% of the volunteers' normal respiratory effort. The volunteers breathed via a mouthpiece through a ventilator circuit, and the modes of ventilation were introduced in a randomized manner. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured visual analog scores for comfort for the three modes of ventilation and collected a ranking order and open-ended comments. We demonstrated that at the level of support we imposed, assisted spontaneous breathing was the most comfortable mode of ventilation and that synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation was the most uncomfortable. These results were strongly supported by both the ranking scale and comments of the volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: Assisted spontaneous breathing was the most comfortable mode of ventilation because the pattern was primarily determined by the volunteer. Synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation was the most uncomfortable because the ventilatory pattern was imposed on the volunteers, leading to ventilator-volunteer dyssynchrony. We also conclude there is wide individual variation in the subjective feeling of comfort. Whereas the mode of ventilation in ICUs is based primarily on the physiologic needs of the patient, the feeling of comfort may be considered when choosing an appropriate mode of ventilation during the weaning phase of critical illness.