Survival Benefit of Transplantation for Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Resection

Background

Liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be used for tumor recurrence after liver resection (LR) both for initially transplant-eligible patients as conventional salvage therapy (ST) and for non–transplant-eligible patients (beyond Milan criteria) with a goal of downstaging (DW). The aim of this study was to compare the intention-to-treat (ITT) survival rates of patients who are listed for LT, according to these two strategies.

Methods

We analyzed a prospective database of 399 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC from 2002 to 2011 to identify patients included in the waiting list for tumor recurrence. Intention-to-treat (ITT) survivals were compared with those of patients resected for HCC within and beyond Milan criteria in the same period and not included in the LT waiting list.

Results

The study group consisted of 42 patients, 28 in the ST group (within Milan) and 14 in the DW group (beyond Milan). The 5-year ITT survival rate was similar between the 2 groups, being 64% for ST and 60% for DW (P = .84). Twenty-five patients (15 ST and 10 DW) underwent LT, 13 (10 ST and 3 DW) were still awaiting LT, 4 (3 ST and 1 DW) dropped out of the waiting list because of tumor progression, and 7 (5 ST [33%] and 2 DW [20%]) had tumor recurrence. The 5-year ITT survival of ST patients was similar to that of 252 in-Milan HCC patients resected only (P = .3), whereas 5-year ITT survival of DW patients was significantly higher (P < .01) than that of 105 beyond-Milan HCC patients resected only.

Conclusions

LR seems to be a safe and effective therapy both as alternative to transplantation and as downstaging strategy for intermediate-advanced HCC. The survival benefit of salvage LT, however, seems to be higher in the 2nd than in the 1st group.     

University of Modena experience in HIV-positive patients undergoing liver transplantation

Introduction

Highly effective antiretroviral therapy in the last decade has increased the survival rates of HIV-positive patients, yielding a greater number of HIV patients suffering from liver-related disease. Liver transplantation (LT) is the only curative treatment for end-stage liver disease (ESLD) associated or not with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and methods

From June 2003 to September 2010, 23 patients underwent cadaveric donor LT for ESLD at our institution. Inclusion criteria followed the Italian Protocol for LT in HIV-positive patients. Immunosuppressive regimens were based on cyclosporine or tacrolimus, eventually switched to Rapamycin.

Results

The median CD4 T-cell count was 275/mmc (range = 119-924). All patients were affected by ESLD, which was associated with HCC in 14 cases. Ten patients were within the Milan criteria and four patients exceeded them but were within the San Francisco criteria. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to rapamycin occurred in ten cases. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence occurred in 13/21 HCV-positive patients. Acute cellular rejection occurred in eight patients with one developing chronic cellular rejection. Overall patient and graft survivals at 80 months were 50% and 45% respectively.

Discussion

LT in HIV-positive patients is a feasible procedure, even if in our experience was burdened by a greater incidence of complications including HCV recurrence and infection compared with HIV-negative patients.     

Sirolimus-Based Immunosuppression Therapy in Liver Transplantation for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Exceeding the Milan Criteria

Aim

Sirolimus (SRL) acts as a primary immunosuppressant or antitumor agent. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of SRL on the recurrence rate and survival of patients after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exceeding the Milan criteria.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively examined 73 consecutive patients who underwent OLT for HCC exceeding the Milan criteria from March 2004 through December 2005. Among them, 27 patients were treated with SRL-based immunosuppressive protocols after OLT, and 46 patients by an FK506-based protocol. Statistical analysis was based on the intent-to-treat method.

Results

The 2 groups were comparable in all clinicopathologic parameters. The mean overall survival was 594 ± 35 days in the SRL group and 480 ± 42 days in the FK506 group (P = .011); the mean disease-free survival period was 519 ± 43 days in the SRL group and 477 ± 48 days in the FK506 group (P = .234). Multivariate analysis revealed Child's status (P = .004) and immunosuppressive protocol (P = .015) were the significant factors affecting overall survival. Only microvascular invasion (P = .004) was significantly associated with disease-free survival. Among 24 surviving patient in the SRL group, 2 patients had SRL discontinued for toxicity; 10 had SRL monotherapy immunosuppression.

Conclusion

The SRL-based immunosuppressive protocol improved the overall survival of patients after OLT for HCC exceeding the Milan criteria, probably by postponing recurrence and with better tolerability.     

Milan Criteria Versus San Francisco Criteria in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Our Center's Experience

Background and aim

Liver transplantation (OLT) represents the best treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in advanced cirrhosis showing a 70% 5-year survival rate. Our study sought to compare overall survivals among patients who underwent OLT under Milan Criteria (MC) or San Francisco Criteria (UCSFC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent liver transplantation for HCC in our institution from November 2001 to December 2007. We analyzed age, gender, OLT indication, maximal tumor size, histology, and survival. We compared survival among patients who met MC versus UCSFC.

Results

From November 2001 to December 2007, 48/177 (27%) liver transplantations performed in our hospital were indicated due to HCC. The two patients who did not show any tumor in the explanted liver (false-positive ratio 4.2%) were excluded from the analysis. Another two patients were included who showed incidental HCC lesions (false-negative ratio 1.7%), yielding 48 analyzed patients. The mean diameter of the HCC nodules were 3.1 cm before OLT and 3.8 cm in the pathologic examination, a statistically significant difference. Two patients exceeded MC before OLT, and six patients showed this feature in the explanted liver. There was a significant difference in the degree of vascular invasion between the two groups. Overall mortality was 25.9% at 4 years; the MC group show an 11.9% versus UCSFC group, a 66.6% rate.

Conclusions

HCC is a common indication for OLT. Hepatitis C virus is the most common etiology. Survival among the MC group was significantly better than that of subjects beyond the MC, a difference that supports the use of MC for HCC.     

Outcome after curative resection for a huge (≥10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma and prognostic significance of gross tumor classification

Background and objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate the surgical outcomes in patients with huge (≥10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Clinicopathological features and surgical outcomes of 50 patients with huge HCC who underwent curative resection (group A) were compared with 447 patients with smaller tumors (group B). In group A, we investigated prognostic factors.

Results

Group A patients had a higher incidence of α-fetoprotein at more than 1,000 IU/mL, microscopic vascular invasion, and advanced stage tumors. The disease-free survival of group A was significantly worse than group B. The rates of initial extrahepatic recurrence and early recurrence were higher in group A. The 5 year-overall survival of group A was 40.2%, significantly lower than that of group B (65.9% at 5 years). In group A, multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of single nodular type tumors was the only good prognostic factor for survival.

Conclusions

Huge HCCs exhibit a more aggressive clinical behavior and worse survival. However, because the outcome of surgical treatment is far better than that of nonsurgical treatment, resection should be actively considered for patients with huge HCC. A single nodular type tumor is the best candidate for surgical resection.     

Extended criteria for living donor liver transplantation in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possibility of expanding the selection criteria in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

From October 2000 to December 2010, we retrospectively analyzed 71 patients who had undergone LDLT beyond the Milan criteria (MC), among the entire cohort of 199 HCC patients. We evaluated the tumor biology as well as overall and disease-free survival (DFS), seeking to identify risk factors for recurrence. The median follow-up was 37 months (range 5-124).

Results

Among the 71 patients beyond the MC were 18 recurrences and 30 deaths. Their 5-year overall and DFS rates were 52.3% and 67.7%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumor diameter, tumor number, and E-S grade significantly influenced overall and DFS. According to our new criteria (size ≤7 cm, number ≤7), 86% of our patients would be included compared with 64% using MC. Five-year DFS and overall survival rates according to our criteria were comparable with the MC: 86.8% and 72.3% versus 86.8% and 73.4%, respectively.

Conclusion

Our criteria appear to achieve useful cut-off values beyond the MC.     

Outcome of Liver Transplantation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients at Siriraj Hospital

Background

Liver transplantation (LT) is one of the standard treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and the outcomes have become better after introduction of strict patient selection, such as the Milan criteria. However, several expanded criteria, such as the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria, have demonstrated similar survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to verify survival outcomes of LT for HCC at Siriraj Hospital.

Liver Transplantation Results for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chile

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common malignant tumor of the liver. Liver transplantation is the best treatment for HCC; it improves survival, cures cirrhosis, and abolishes local recurrence. We describe the outcomes of patients with HCC who underwent liver transplantation in two liver transplantation centers in Chile.

Methods

This study is a clinical series elaborated from the liver transplantation database of Pontificia Universidad Católica and Clínica Alemana between 1993 and 2009. The survival of patients was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The significant alpha level was defined as <.05.

Results

From 250 liver transplantations performed in this period, 29 were due to HCC. At the end of the study, 25 patients (86%) were alive. The mean recurrence-free survival was 30 months (range 5 months to 8 years). The 5-year survival for patients transplanted for HCC was >80%; however, the 5-year overall survival of patients who exceeded the Milan criteria in the explants was 66%. There was no difference in overall survival between patients transplanted for HCC versus other diagnosis (P = .548).

Conclusion

This series confirmed that liver transplantation is a good treatment for patients with HCC within the Milan criteria.     

Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Transplantation: A 12-Year Experience

Background

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for patients with cirrhosis and concomitant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in early stages is the treatment of choice, with an acceptable recurrence rate and excellent survival.

Aim

We sought to evaluate (1) the accuracy of preoperative imaging; (2) the impact of pre-OLT treatments on survival and recurrence; and (3) the influence of beyond Milan criteria selection on global outcomes.

Methods

We studied a cohort of 65 patients with HCC among 300 consecutive OLTs over a single 12-year experience. We analyzed the overall outcomes of survival and recurrence, the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis and staging the influence of neoadjuvant treatment prior to OLT, and the effect on overall outcomes beyond the Milan criteria in our series.

Results

The 65 transplants were performed for HCC, mostly in association with hepatitis C virus and alcoholic cirrhosis with HTP. At a mean follow-up of 40.32 months, the recurrence rate was 5.7% among the 61 HCC confirmed by histopathology. The overall survival was 30.07. Actuarial survivals at 1, 5, and 10 years were 82%, 77%, and 62%, respectively. Six retransplants occurred among the seven graft losses albeit with poor survival after the second graft. Most explants showed low pTNM stages with favorable microscopic features. Preoperative imaging tests failed to achieve an accurate diagnosis in 15.38% of the series. The role of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and hepatic biopsy was irrelevant. Unfavorable histopathologic factors predicted a greater recurrence rate, but had no influence on survival. Neither recurrence nor survival were modified by pre-OLT therapy.

Conclusions

In our series, AFP, hepatic biopsy, and pre-OLT treatment had limited roles. Radiological imaging techniques underestimated HCC staging and lead to a misdiagnosis to an expected degree. Despite these findings, this single institution experience with OLT for HCC showed excellent survivals with a low recurrence rate including cases of patients beyond the Milan criteria.     

Liver Transplantation for Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma: One Center's Experience in China

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common and the third most deadly cancer worldwide, with more than half a million identified cases and about a similar number of subjects succumb to it each year. This study sought to evaluate our results of liver transplantation for HCC to identify prognostic factors.

Methods

Between December 2001 and December 2006, 224 patients (205 men, 19 women; age range, 15-75 years) with HCC underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) at our center. All grafts were from deceased donors. There were 68 cases within Milan criteria (30.3%), 32 cases beyond Milan criteria but within UCSF (University of California, San Francisco) criteria (14.3%), and 124 cases beyond UCSF criteria (55.4%).

Results

The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient cumulative survival rates were 82.5%, 60.1%, and 51.5%, respectively. The survival rates were comparable between patients within Milan and UCSF criteria, but were significantly greater than that of patients beyond UCSF criteria. Multivariate analysis revealed alpha fetoprotein (AFP) ≥ 800 μg/L, vascular invasion, and poor tumor differentiation to be independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion

OLT is a safe and effective treatment for hepatitis B virus-related HCC. Compared with Milan criteria, UCSF criteria successfully expanded the indication without deteriorating the prognosis significantly, while preoperative AFP ≥ 800 μg/L, vascular invasion, and poor tumor differentiation indicated poor survival.     

Salvage Liver Transplantation for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Resection: Feasibility of the Milan Criteria and Operative Risk

Introduction

Although the Milan criteria are widely accepted for liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), they have not been fully evaluated as feasible for salvage liver transplantation (SLT) of recurrent HCC after hepatic resection. The operative difficulties of SLT increase the operative risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the Milan criteria for SLT and its operative complications.

Patients and methods

From March 2005 to November 2007, 46 HCC patients received OLT including 15 SLTs after prior partial hepatectomy (SLT group) and 31 primary OLTs (PLT group).

Results

There was no postsurgical hospital mortality among the SLT group but one case in the PLT group due to pneumonia followed by sepsis. There was no difference in the incidence of surgical complications between the two groups. Overall survival rates of SLT group patients were similar to those of the PLT group (P = .14), especially comparing both groups of patients within the Milan criteria (P = .89). There was no recurrence of HCC among the patients within the Milan criteria.

Conclusions

SLT is a feasible procedure for recurrent HCC meeting the Milan criteria; the operative risk of the SLT is also acceptable.     

Liver Transplantation and Liver Resection for Cirrhotic Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of Long-Term Survivals

Background

Both liver transplantation (LT) and liver resection (LR) represent curative treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with liver cirrhosis. In this study, we have compared outcomes between historical and more recent patient cohorts scheduled either for LT or LR, respectively.

Methods

Clinicopathological data of all patients with HCC and cirrhosis who underwent LT or LR between 1989 and 2011 were evaluated. Overall survival of patients with HCC within the Milan criteria (MC) was analyzed focusing on changes between different time periods.

Results

In total, 364 and 141 patients underwent LT and LR for HCC in cirrhosis, respectively. Among patients with HCC within MC, 214 and 59 underwent LT and LR, respectively. Postoperative morbidity (37 vs. 11%, P?<?.0001), but not mortality (3 vs. 1%, P?=?.165), was higher after LR than after LT for HCC within MC. In the period 1989–2004, overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in patients who underwent LT compared to LR for HCC within MC (5-year OS: 77 vs. 36%, P?<?.0001). Interestingly, in the more recent period 2005–2011, OS was comparable between LT and LR for HCC within MC (5-year OS: 73 vs. 61%, P?=?.07).

Conclusion

We have noted an improvement of outcomes among patients selected for partial hepatectomy in recent years that were comparable to stable results after LT in cirrhotic patients with HCC. Whether those improvements are due to advances in liver surgery, optimized perioperative managament for patients with liver cirrhosis, and the development of modern multimodal treatment strategies for the recurrent lesions appears plausible.

     

Effectiveness of locoregional therapy before living donor liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who meet the Milan criteria

Background

Many patients are diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria. In Korea, these patients are preferentially treated with locoregional therapy (LRT) instead of living donor liver transplantation. We investigated the effectiveness of LRT in liver transplant recipients who met the Milan criteria at the time of HCC diagnosis and investigated risk factors for HCC recurrence.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with HCC who met the Milan criteria between 2002 and 2008.

Results

We performed 101 liver transplants for HCC during the study period. Seventy-one patients (70%) underwent pretransplant LRT. The disease-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years in patients who received LRT were 96.6%, 93.1%, and 93.1%, and in those who did not receive LRT, 94.2%, 83.4%, and 83.4%, respectively. There were no differences between the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis showed that a low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and microvascular invasion were independent predictors of HCC recurrence after transplantation. The MELD scores and rate of microvascular invasion were not statistically different in patients with or without previous LRT.

Conclusion

Pretransplant LRT for patients with HCC who met the Milan criteria at the time of diagnosis did not provide a clear benefit with respect to HCC recurrence after transplantation. If patients have suitable living donors, those who meet the Milan criteria should undergo a liver transplantation as soon as possible.     

Progression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Before Liver Transplantation: Dropout or Liver Transplantation?

Background

Tumor progression before liver transplantation (OLT) is the main cause of dropout from the waiting list (WL) of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to show a correlation between adopted dropout criteria and dropout/intention-to-treat survival rates of WL HCC patients.

Methods

The study period was 2000 to 2007. The dropout criteria were macroscopic vascular invasion, metastases, or a poorly differentiated tumor. Adult patients with benign chronic liver disease enlisted for primary OLT in the same period represented the control group.

Results

Dropout probability of study (n = 128) versus control group (n = 377) subjects was similar: namely, 12% at 1 year in both groups (P = NS). Intention-to-treat survival curve of the HCC group overlapped that of the benign group (5-year survival rates were 73% and 71%, respectively; P = NS). At the time of listing, 103 study group patients were within the Milan criteria (MC): among these patients, 29 (28%) showed tumor progression beyond MC before OLT. Simulating the dropout of these 29 patients at the time of diagnosis of tumor progression, we compared the dropout probability of the 103 patients within MC with that of the control group. As a result, the 1- and 2-year dropout rates became 37% and 53%, respectively, in the study group, which were significantly higher than those in the controls (P < .01).

Conclusion

HCC patients on the WL showed a significantly greater dropout rate than subjects with benign cirrhosis when too restrictive radiologic dropout criteria were used. The adoption of criteria more related to biological aggressiveness of a tumor decreased the dropout risk for HCC patients without impairing their intention-to-treat survival rates.     

Bridge Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Before Liver Transplantation: The Experience of Two Chilean Centers

Background

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is currently an established therapy for small, early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria. Long waiting times due to the shortage of donor organs can result in tumor progression and drop-out from OLT candidacy. Therefore a wide variety of procedures are necessary before OLT. The aim of this retrospective study was to review our experience in relation to bridge therapy prior to OLT for HCC.

Methods

This was a retrospective database review of all of the patient who underwent transplantation in our institutions between January 1993 and June 2009. We analyzed patients with a diagnosis of HCC in the explant.

Results

Among 29 patients, including 12 who were diagnosed by the explant and 17 prior to transplantation, 88% underwent bridge therapy during a mean waiting time to OLT of 12 months. Among the 23 procedures, namely 1.5 procedures per patient, included most frequently chemoembolization (48%), alcohol ablation (30%), radiofrequency ablation (13%), and surgery (9%). Thirty-three percent of the explants contained lesions within the Milan criteria. In our series the 5-year survival rate for patients transplanted for HCC was 86%; in the bridge therapy group, it was 73%.

Conclusions

The incidence of patients who underwent bridge therapy (52%) was similar to other reported experiences, but the fulfillment of Milan criteria in the explants was lower. Among the bridge therapy group, the survival was slightly lower, probably because this group displayed more advanced disease.     

Late recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: is an active surveillance for recurrence needed?

Introduction

Liver transplantation (OLT) is considered the most efficient therapeutic option for patients with liver cirrhosis and early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in terms of overall survival and recurrence rates, when restrictive selection criteria are applied. Nevertheless, tumor recurrence may occur in 3.5% to 21% of recipients. It usually occurs within 2 years following OLT, having a major negative impact on prognosis. The efficacy of active posttransplantation surveillance for recurrence has not been demonstrated, due to the poor prognosis of recipients with recurrences.

Aim

To analyze the clinical, pathological, and prognostic consequences of late recurrence (>5 years after OLT).

Method

We analyzed the clinical records of 165 HCC patients including 142 males of overall mean age of 58 ± 6.9 years who underwent OLT between July 1994 and August 2011.

Results

Overall survival was 84%, 76%, 66.8%, and 57% at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Tumor recurrence, which was observed in 18 (10.9%) recipients, was a major predictive factor for survival: its rates were 72.2%, 53.3%, 26.7%, and 10% at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. HCC recurrence was detected in 77.8% of patients within the first 3 years after OLT. Three recipients (100% males, aged 54-60 years) showed late recurrences after 7, 9, and 10 years. In only one case were Milan criteria surpassed after the examination of explanted liver; no vascular invasion was detected in any case. Recurrence sites were peritoneal, intrahepatic, and subcutaneous abdominal wall tissue. In all cases, immunosuppression was switched from a calcineurin-inhibitor to a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor. We surgically resected the extrahepatic recurrences. The remaining recipient was treated with transarterial chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting beads and sorafenib. Prognosis after diagnosis of recurrence was poor with median a survival of 278 days (range, 114-704).

Conclusions

Global survival, recurrence rate, and pattern of recurrence were similar to previously reported data. Nevertheless, in three patients recurrence was diagnosed >5 years after OLT. Although recurrence was limited and surgically removed in two cases, disease-free survival was poor. Thus, prolonged active surveillance for HCC recurrence beyond 5 years after OLT may be not useful to provide a survival benefit for these patients.     

Impact of Tumor Characteristic on the Outcome of Liver Transplantation in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Introduction

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a well-established treatment for cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who meet the Milan criteria. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of survival among 65 patients with HCC in cirrhotic livers who underwent liver transplantation (OLT).

Methods

From January 2001 to December 2008, we performed 655 OLT in 615 patients. HCC was diagnosed in 58 patients before OLT and in 65 by histological examination of the explanted livers; 74% of the patients met Milan criteria by histological examination.

Results

The median follow-up was 27 months (range = 1-96). We analyzed patient age and gender, etiology of liver disease, Child score at transplantation, rejection episodes, tumor number/size, vascular invasion, and differentiation grade. There was no significant difference in survival among patients grouped according to the Model for End-stage Liver Disease staging system for HCC. The 5-year survival of patients with low differentiated (G3) HCC was significantly worse than that of those with moderately differentiated (G2) or well-differentiated (G1) HCC: 50%, 81%, and 86% respectively, (P < .01). Patients with microvascular invasion displayed a worse 5-year survival than those without vascular invasion (42% vs 80%; P < .01).

Conclusions

The analysis indicated that the histological grade of the tumors and evidences of microscopic vascular invasion were the most useful predictive factors for overall survival among patients with cirrhosis after liver transplantation for HCC.     

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of a Multicenter Study With Common Priorization Criteria

Objective

To evaluate the results of liver transplantation (OLT) performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among a multicenter cohort of patients with predefined common inclusion and priorization criteria.

Patients and Methods

Over a 5-year period (January 2002-December 2006), 199 HCC patients underwent OLT in four centers in Andalusia. The morphological (Milan) inclusion criteria were priorized in two consecutive periods, according to the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score: group I, 53 patients (HCC < 2 cm = 24 points; ≥ 2 cm or multinodular = 29 points) and group II, 146 cases (HCC < 3 cm without priorization; HCC ≥ 3 cm or multinodular = 18 points).

Results

Among the 199 HCCs, 186 (93.5%) subjects were transplanted and 13 (6.5%) were excluded. There were 18 cases (9.7%) where the diagnosis was incidental and 168 were known HCC cases; 144 (85.7%) complied with the Milan criteria (Milan+); 24 (14.3%) exceeded there criteria (Milan−). According to preoperative imaging, the number of nodules and tumor mean sizes among the excluded—Milan+ and Milan− groups—were 1.8/5.3 cm, 1.4/3.5 cm, and 2.3/6.7 cm, respectively (P < .001). Percutaneous treatment during listing was delivered to 55% of the excluded cases: 49% of Milan+ and 96% of Milan−. The median time on the list was 88 days for known HCC (53 days for group I, and 97 days for group II), and 172 days for the incidental HCCs. Staging (pTNM) was correct in 64% of cases: 23% were understaged and 13% were overstaged. Overall mortality within the first 90 days was 9%, and transplant patient survival at 5 years was 61%. No differences were observed in survival rates between both study periods, although there were differences between the Milan+ (65%) and Milan− (23%) groups (P < .04). In addition, the difference in the recurrence rates was also significant between the Milan+ (7%), Milan− (24%), and the incidental (25%) groups (P < .02).

Conclusions

A common priorization policy of HCC for OLT based on morphological criteria results in a low exclusion rate on the waiting lists (6.5%). The Milan criteria are still a good cutoff to stratify the risk of recurrence, despite preoperative tumor staging being correct in only two-thirds of cases.     

Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Long-Term Results Compared With Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation

Objective

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may represent a valid therapeutic option allowing several advantages for patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, some reports in the literature have demonstrated worse long-term and disease-free survivals among patients treated by LDLT than deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) for HCC. Herein we have reported our long-term results comparing LDLT with DDLT for HCC.

Patients and Methods

Among 179 patients who underwent OLT from January 2000 to December 2007, 25 (13.9%) received LDLT with HCC 154 (86.1%) received DDLT. Patients were selected based on the Milan criteria. Transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous alcoholization, or liver resection was applied as a downstaging procedure while on the waiting list. Patients with stage II HCC were proposed for LDLT.

Results

The overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 77.3% and 68.7% versus 82.8% and 76.7% for LDLT and DDLT recipients, respectively, with no significant difference by the log-rank test. Moreover, the 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 95.5% and 95.5% (LDLT) versus 90.5% and 89.4% (DDLT; P = NS).

Conclusions

LDLT guarantees the same long-term results as DDLT where there are analogous selection criteria for candidates. The Milan criteria remain a valid tool to select candidates for LDLT to achieve optimal long-term results.