A TEOAE screening protocol based on linear click stimuli: performance and scoring criteria.

In order to improve the quality of current TEOAE recording methodologies, we have conducted a comparison of TEOAE neonatal recordings acquired with linear protocols using click stimuli of 68 dB SPL and non-linear protocols using the ILO default stimulus values. From a theoretical standpoint it was expected that the linear recordings would generate responses characterized by higher S/N ratios due to the fact that the stimulus sequence contains four clicks of the same intensity and polarity. The project included recordings from 1,416 neonatal ears (age 48 h). The TEOAE data were compared in terms of correlation, response amplitude, noise, corrected response and S/N ratio in the 1.0-, 2.0-, 3.0-, 4.0- and 5.0-kHz bands, using a paired t-test criterion. We found that windowed (4-14 ms) responses evoked by a linear TEOAE protocol generated superior S/N estimates in the 2.0-, 3.0-, 4.0- and 5.0-kHz TEOAE bands, in addition to superior correlation estimates, and demonstrated lower levels of noise. Clear-cut scoring criteria were established for the S/N ratios at 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 kHz, by constructing one-sided distribution-free tolerance boundaries.     

Optimization of TEOAE recording protocols: a linear protocol derived from parameters of a time-frequency analysis: a pilot study on neonatal subjects

Linear and non-linear TEOAE protocols were compared in terms of nine parameters in order to define the protocol producing recordings with the highest signal quality (lowest noise and highest signal-to-noise ratio). The pilot project acquired data using ILO-92 apparatus from 220 neonates (397 ears) at the second/third day after birth in three European laboratories. A Gabor spectrogram time-frequency representation of the recordings showed considerable frequency dispersion in TEOAE latencies >4.0 ms. The data, analysed with a Wilcoxon test, indicated that a linear TEOAE protocol: (i) generates recordings of a lower noise and a higher signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio in the 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 kHz TEOAE bands; (ii) the increase in the S/N ratio can result in a decrement of the required number of TEOAE sweeps; (iii) the higher values of S/N can be used in the estimation of more robust pass-fail criteria, minimizing the percentage of false positives and negatives.     

Comparison of neonatal transient evoked otoacoustic emission responses recorded with linear and QuickScreen protocols

Linear and QuickScreen (non-linear) transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) protocols were compared in terms of standardized clinical parameters in order to define the protocol producing recordings with the highest signal quality. Neonatal responses (520) were obtained from three different screening sites. The linear recordings were evoked by 69 and 75-dB p.e. SPL clicks. All responses were post-windowed by a 3.5- to 12.5-ms window, chosen by time-frequency analysis as the segment representing 97.35 per cent (linear) and 95.6 per cent (quick) of the total cumulative spectral energy. Evidence from hearing loss cases and the high similarity between the profile contours of the QuickScreen and the linear normal recordings have strongly suggested that a linear response evoked by a 75-dB p.e. SPL stimulus and post-processed by a 3.5 to 12.5 window is free of stimulus artefacts. The data indicate that the 75-dB linear protocol produces higher signal to noise ratios at 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 kHz, higher wave reproducibility, and lower TEOAE noise values than the QuickScreen protocol.     

Time-frequency analyses of TEOAE recordings from normals and SNHL patients

This study evaluated the characteristics of transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) time-frequency (TF) representations from normal and hearing-impaired ears. Linear and non-linear TEOAE recordings from normally-hearing subjects (40) and non-linear recordings from patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) (40) were analysed using the short-time-Fourier-transform spectrogram, the Gabor spectrogram, and the adaptive spectrogram. The TF representations of the TEOAE recordings indicated a considerable dispersion of energy across frequencies and TEOAE time segments >4.0 ms. The linear and non-linear recordings from the normal subjects showed common frequency peaks. The TF representations from the patients with SNHL indicated that the significantly reduced energy in the mid-to-high TEOAE frequencies did not correlate closely with the threshold elevation. As in the recordings from the normal subjects, a high percentage of the TEOAE cumulative energy was found within a short TEOAE segment (4-14 ms).     

Linear versus non-linear recordings of transiently-evoked otoacoustic emissions--methodological considerations

A non-linear technique is predominantly used for the recording of transiently-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs). The aim of this study was to compare linear and non-linear TEOAE recordings. TEOAEs were recorded in 22 normal hearing subjects to clicks from 90 to 30 dB SPL in 10 dB steps with the ILO88 system using both linear and non-linear recording techniques. The non-linear recording technique reduces stimulus artifacts for early latencies, but total elimination could not be proved. Both artifact reduction and significant differences between the two kinds of TEOAE recordings were reduced for longer latencies and lower stimulus intensities. For longer latencies (>10 ms) there was no significant difference between "linear" and "non-linear" TEOAEs. A higher signal-to-noise ratio was found for "linear" TEOAEs, resulting in better identification and a higher test-retest correlation. The linear recording technique, which includes new methods of artifact cancellation in comparison to the mainly utilized non-linear recording technique, should be used especially in hearing screening.     

Ototoxic effects of cisplatin in a Sprague-Dawley rat animal model as revealed by ABR and transiently evoked otoacoustic emission measurements

The ototoxic effects of cisplatin in a Sprague–Dawley rat model were evaluated by recordings of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs). The ABR responses were evoked from alternating clicks and 8, 10, 12, 16, 20 and 30 kHz tone pips in a range from 40 to 100 dB SPL range. The TEOAEs were recorded with a non-linear protocol, and were evoked by a 63.5 dB SPL click stimulus. Twenty five male Sprague–Dawley rats were used in the study, 20 animals were treated with cisplatin (16 mg/kg, body weight) and five animals served as controls. The data showed that 72 h after the cisplatin administration, the TEOAE and ABR variables were significantly altered. The relationship between the ABR and TEOAE variables was shown to be non-linear. The most significant relationships were observed between the TEOAE correlation and the ABR threshold values at 10, 12, and 16 kHz.     

新生儿与成人瞬态诱发耳声发射性别差异的比较

目的探讨瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAE)的性别差异在新生儿与成人之间的变化。方法以短声刺激分别对120名(女62,男58)通过听力筛查的新生儿及53名(男26,女27)纯音听阈正常的青年成人行TEOAE检测,对两组TEOAE强度及频带信噪比(SNR)的性别差异进行分析。结果①成人组TEOAE强度性别差异(2.41dB)明显高于新生儿(0.99dB)。②新生儿SNR除1kHz男婴高于女婴外,其余频带均为女婴高于男婴,且SNR的性别差异随频率增加而增大,在3、4kHz差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。成人不同频带SNR均为女性高于男性,除3kHz外也呈现随频率增加而增大的特征,在2、4kHz差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 TEOAE总强度的性别差异随年龄增加而增大,且新生儿及成人频带SNR的性别差异均随频率增加而增大,成人低频区SNR的性别差异较新生儿更明显。     

Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: transient evoked otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period

OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) levels, noise levels and signal to noise ratios (SNRs) for a range of frequency bands in three groups of neonates who were tested as a part of the Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment multi-center consortium project. 2) To describe the relations between these TEOAE measurements and age, test environment, baby state, and test time. DESIGN: TEOAEs were measured in 4478 graduates of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), 353 well babies with at least one risk indicator, and 2348 well babies without risk factors. TEOAE and noise levels were measured for frequency bands centered at 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 kHz for a click stimulus level of 80 dB SPL. For those ears not meeting "passing" stopping criteria at 80 dB pSPL, a level of 86 dB pSPL was included. Measurement-based stopping rules were used such that a test did not terminate unless the response revealed a criterion SNR in four out of five frequency bands or no response occurred after a preset number of averages. Baby state, test environment, and other test factors were captured at the time of test. RESULTS: TEOAE levels, noise levels and SNRs were similar for NICU graduates, well babies with risk factors and well babies without risk factors. There were no consistent differences in response quality as a function of test environment, i.e., private room, unit, open crib, nonworking isolette, or working isolette. Noise level varied little across risk group, test environment, or infant state other than crying, suggesting that the primary source of noise in TEOAE measurements is infant noise. The most significant effect on response quality was center frequency. Responses were difficult to measure in the half-octave band centered at 1.0 kHz, compared with higher frequencies. Reliable responses were measured routinely at frequencies of 1.5 kHz and higher. CONCLUSIONS: TEOAEs are easily measured in both NICU graduates and well babies with and without risk factors for hearing loss in a wide variety of test environments. Given the difficulties encountered in making reliable measurements for a frequency band centered at 1.0 kHz, its inclusion in a screening program may not be justified.     

Efficient otoacoustic emission protocols employed in a hospital-based neonatal screening program

Within the context of a hospital-based newborn hearing screening program, we have studied the application of two OAE protocols (TEOAE and DPOAE) on a group of 250 well babies. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of DPOAE protocol in a relatively large population sample. using a preset number of five tested frequencies, in comparison with a default TEOAE screening protocol. The data were collected on the second day of life and during spontaneous sleep. The TEOAE recordings were acquired with linear protocols using click stimuli of 70-75 dB SPL and were used as indicators of normal cochlear function. The cubic distortion product DPOAE responses were evoked by an asymmetrical 75-65 dB SPL protocol, with a frequency ratio of 1.22. Five frequencies (referring to F2) were tested at 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0 kHz. The data from the DPOAE responses show a similar pass rate (similarity = 0.98) to the linear TEOAE protocol. The data presented suggest that a DPOAE cochlear evaluation, at 5 pre-selected frequencies, has clinical potential.     

The effect of high-pass filtering on TEOAE in 2-month-old infants

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of high-pass filtering on TEOAE obtained from 2-month-old infants as a function of filter cut-off frequency, activity states and pass/fail status of infants. Two experiments were performed. In Experiment 1, 100 2-month-old infants (200 ears) in five activity states (asleep, awake but peaceful, sucking a pacifier, feeding, restless) were tested by use of TEOAE technology. Five different filter conditions were applied to the TEOAE responses post hoc. The filter conditions were set at 781 Hz (default setting), 1.0, 1.2, 1.4 and 1.6 kHz. Results from this experiment showed that TEOAE parameters such as whole-wave reproducibility (WR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 0.8 kHz and 1.6 kHz, changed as a function of the cut-off frequency. The findings suggest that the 1.6 kHz and 1.2 kHz filter conditions are optimal for WR and SNR pass/fail criteria, respectively. Although all infant recordings appeared to benefit from the filtering, infants in the noisy states seemed to benefit the most. In Experiment 2, the high-pass filtering technique was applied to 23 infants (35 ears) who apparently failed the TEOAE tests on initial screening but were subsequently awarded a pass status based on the results from a follow-up auditory brainstem response (ABR) assessment. The findings showed a significant decrease in noise contamination of the TEOAE with a corresponding significant increase in WR. With high-pass filtering at 1.6 kHz, 21/35 ears could be reclassified into the pass category.     

Efficient Otoacoustic Emission Protocols Employed in a Hospital-based Neonatal Screening Program

Within the context of a hospital-based newborn hearing screening program, we have studied the application of two OAE protocols (TEOAE and DPOAE) on a group of 250 well babies. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of DPOAE protocol in a relatively large population sample, using a preset number of five tested frequencies, in comparison with a default TEOAE screening protocol. The data were collected on the second day of life and during spontaneous sleep. The TEOAE recordings were acquired with linear protocols using click stimuli of 70-75 dB SPL and were used as indicators of normal cochlear function. The cubic distortion product DPOAE responses were evoked by an asymmetrical 75-65 dB SPL protocol, with a frequency ratio of 1.22. Five frequencies (referring to F₂) were tested at 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0 kHz. The data from the DPOAE responses show a similar pass rate (similarity=0.98) to the linear TEOAE protocol. The data presented suggest that a DPOAE cochlear evaluation, at 5 pre-selected frequencies, has clinical potential.     

Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in a Representative Population Sample Aged 18 to 25 Years: Emisiones otoacüAsticas evocadas por transitorios en una muestra representativa de población con edades entre 18 y 25 años

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) were obtained from 688 ears of a group of 345 young adults aged 18 to 25 years, using the Otodynamics ILO88 in the standard, non-linear mode. Normative data for TEOAEs obtained from 186 otologically normal (ON) ears are presented. In 5 ON ears, there was no recordable response, despite hearing threshold levels better than 20 dB. The main factors affecting the TEOAE level were (1) gender, where females had larger responses on average than males; (2) tym-panometric measures, where ears with entirely normal tympanometric measures had larger responses than those with minor tympanometric abnormalities; (3) click stimulus intensity measured in the ear canal, which correlated positively with TEOAE level; and (4) hearing threshold level at 0.5 kHz, which correlated negatively with amplitude. There was also a small effect of social noise exposure in the 2-kHz region of the TEOAE, where the response was lower in those subjects exposed to significant social noise.     

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a representative population sample aged 18 to 25 years

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) were obtained from 688 ears of a group of 345 young adults aged 18 to 25 years, using the Otodynamics ILO88 in the standard, non-linear mode. Normative data for TEOAEs obtained from 186 otologically normal (ON) ears are presented. In 5 ON ears, there was no recordable response, despite hearing threshold levels better than 20 dB. The main factors affecting the TEOAE level were (1) gender, where females had larger responses on average than males; (2) tympanometric measures, where ears with entirely normal tympanometric measures had larger responses than those with minor tympanometric abnormalities; (3) click stimulus intensity measured in the ear canal, which correlated positively with TEOAE level; and (4) hearing threshold level at 0.5 kHz, which correlated negatively with amplitude. There was also a small effect of social noise exposure in the 2-kHz region of the TEOAE, where the response was lower in those subjects exposed to significant social noise.     

Basal Contributions to Short-Latency Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Components

The presence of short-latency (SL), less compressive-growing components in bandpass-filtered transient-evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) waveforms may implicate contributions from cochlear regions basal to the tonotopic place. Recent empirical work suggests a region of SL generation between ∼1/5 and 1/10-octave basal to the TEOAE frequency’s tonotopic place. However, this estimate may be biased to regions closer to the tonotopic place as the TEOAE extraction technique precluded measurement of components with latencies shorter than ∼5 ms. Using a variant of the non-linear, double-evoked extraction paradigm that permitted extraction of components with latencies as early as 1 ms, the current study empirically estimated the spatial-extent of the cochlear region contributing to 2 kHz SL TEOAE components. TEOAEs were evoked during simultaneous presentation of a suppressor stimulus, in order to suppress contributions to the TEOAE from different places along the cochlear partition. Three or four different-latency components of similar frequency content (∼2 kHz) were identified for most subjects. Component latencies ranged from 1.4 to 9.6 ms; latency was predictive of the component’s growth rate and the suppressor frequency to which the component’s magnitude was most sensitive to change. As component latency decreased, growth became less compressive and suppressor-frequency sensitivity shifted to higher frequencies. The shortest-latency components were most sensitive to suppressors approximately 3/5-octave higher than their nominal frequency of 2 kHz. These results are consistent with a distributed region of generation extending to approximately 3/5-octave basal to the TEOAE frequency’s tonotopic place. The empirical estimates of TEOAE generation are similar to model-based estimates where generation of the different-latency components occurs through linear reflection from impedance discontinuities distributed across the cochlear partition.     

TEOAE amplitude growth,detectability, and response threshold in linear and nonlinear mode and in different time windows

Transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) have been recorded in 60 ears of 31 adult volunteers with nearly normal hearing at stimulus levels ranging from 83 dB SPL peak equivalent down to the individual response threshold using linear and nonlinear recording mode. The stimulus level dependence of response incidence and amplitude has been analysed for the integral response and in time windows selecting response components of limited latency ranges. At stimulus levels above 70 dB SPL peak equivalent the TEOAE records received in linear mode are contaminated with stimulus artifacts. At moderate stimulus levels the TEOAE amplitude differs only to a small extent between the two recording modes. At low levels the linear mode turns out to be better suited for signal detection due to its inherent lower noise level. The response threshold, defined as the highest stimulus level yielding a reproducibility of at least 60%, is significantly correlated to hearing threshold. The consideration of time windowed responses yields best results with respect to incidence and threshold of responses in the latency range between 5 and 10 ms, but it does not enhance frequency specificity.     

瞬态诱发耳声发射检测职业性听力损伤的可行性研究

目的 :探讨瞬态诱发耳声发射 (TEOAE)检测职业性听力损伤的可行性及临床应用价值。方法 :选择 90例 (180耳 )噪声暴露工人为实验总组 ,按噪声暴露时间长短又分为 1、2、3组 ;另选 11例 (2 2耳 )正常听力青年人作为对照组 ,行纯音听阈和TEOAE测试。结果 :各实验组纯音听阈值明显高于对照组 ,TEOAE总重复率、幅值和信噪比及各频段重复率、幅值和信噪比明显低于对照组 (P <0 .0 5或P <0 .0 1)。实验 1、2、3组间比较 ,随着噪声接触时间的增加 ,各频率点纯音听阈提高 ,TEOAE总重复率、幅值和信噪比及各频段重复率、幅值和信噪比变小 ,在 2 .5 0～ 3.5 0kHz和 3.5 0～ 4 .5 0kHz频段最明显。结论 :用TEOAE检测职业性听力损伤是可行的 ,有临床应用价值 ,最敏感频段为 2 .5 0～ 3.5 0kHz和 3.5 0～ 4 .5 0kHz频段。     

TEOAE amplitude growth, detectability, and response threshold in linear and nonlinear mode and in different time windows

Transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) have been recorded in 60 ears of 31 adult volunteers with nearly normal hearing at stimulus levels ranging from 83 dB SPL peak equivalent down to the individual response threshold using linear and nonlinear recording mode. The stimulus level dependence of response incidence and amplitude has been analysed for the integral response and in time windows selecting response components of limited latency ranges. At stimulus levels above 70 dB SPL peak equivalent the TEOAE records received in linear mode are contaminated with stimulus artifacts. At moderate stimulus levels the TEOAE amplitude differs only to a small extent between the two recording modes. At low levels the linear mode turns out to be better suited for signal detection due to its inherent lower noise level. The response threshold, defined as the highest stimulus level yielding a reproducibility of at least 60%, is significantly correlated to hearing threshold. The consideration of time windowed responses yields best results with respect to incidence and threshold of responses in the latency range between 5 and 10 ms, but it does not enhance frequency specificity.     

Evaluation of anesthesia effects in a rat animal model using otoacoustic emission protocols

Anesthesia effects on otoacoustic emission (OAE) recordings were evaluated in a group of 72 Sprague–Dawley rats (mean weight 225±20 gr). Two anesthesia dosages (high and normal) and two anesthetic protocols (ketamine–xylazine, ketamine–xylazine–atropine) were tested. Transient evoked OAE (TEOAE) and distortion product OAE (DPOAE) responses were recorded in 10 min intervals, for a total period of 60 min. Analyses of the data with repeated measure models indicated the following: (1) The animals receiving a high dose of anesthesia (cumulative dose 66.6 mg of ketamine and 13.2 mg of xylazine/kg of body weight) presented significant alterations of the TEOAE response level and the signal to noise ratio at 3.0 kHz; (2) the animals receiving a normal dose of ketamine–xylazine anesthesia (cumulative dose 50 mg of ketamine and 10 mg of xylazine/kg of body weight) presented TEOAE and DPOAE responses invariant in terms of time; (3) significant differences were observed in the DPOAE responses from animals anesthetized with ketamine–xylazine and ketamine–xylazine–atropine. The data support the hypothesis that the ketamine anesthesia OAE suppressing mechanism is related to middle-ear mechanics.     

TEOAE-based estimation of the auditory threshold in the mid-octave frequencies

The purpose of this study was to estimate the hearing levels, at the mid-frequencies, of 233 ears with sensorineural hearing loss by classifying the corresponding transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) recordings into three threshold groups. A classification algorithm was based upon a discriminant analysis of fast Fourier transform (FFT) data, evoked by non-linear click stimuli of 80 (+/-2) dB SPL per ear. To validate the efficiency of the proposed methodology TEOAE recordings were initially grouped by mean hearing level values of the 1 kHz and 2 kHz octaves into three threshold ranges according to two strategy schemes: in the first, TEOAE data were assigned into 10-19 dB HL, 20-39 dB HL or > or = 40 dB HL groups. In the second, TEOAE data were assigned into 10-29 > dB H >, 30-39 dB HL or > or = 40 dB HL groups. The most accurate prediction estimates were obtained from the second strategy scheme with a 90.9% accuracy in the 10-29 dB HL group, 82% in the 30-39 dB HL group and 71.4% in the > or = 40 dB HL group.     

新生儿与成人瞬态诱发耳声发射差异的频谱特性分析

目的 比较新生儿与成人瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAE)的差异,并分析其频谱特性.方法 以短声刺激分别对120名通过听力筛查的新生儿(男58,女62)和32名平均纯音听阈(听力级)在20 dB以内的成年人(男15,女17)行TEOAE检测,对于测试结果 行频谱分析和半倍频程分析.结果 ①新生儿组TEOAE总强度(声压级,下同)为(15.18±4.39)dB,高于成人组的(9.51±4.12)dB,差异具有统计学意义(t=9.303,P<0.05).②新生儿的频带重复率、频带重复率非0比例、频带信噪比检出率及频带信噪比在第1频带(0.8 kHz)最低,在3.2 kHz最大;而成人在第5频带(4.0 kHz)处最低,在1.5 kHz最大.③新生儿与成人最大频带信噪比强度差为7.09 dB,二者出现的频率位置相差约1.7 kHz.④半倍频程分析显示新生儿TEOAE最大能量为(10.50±5.09)dB,在2828 Hz处,而成人为(2.84±5.33)dB,在1414 Hz处;二者最大反应在强度上相差7.66 dB,出现的频率位置相差1414 Hz.⑤成人1.5 kHz区的TEOAE信号最强,之后其信噪比随频带增高而降低,而新生儿信噪比却呈现随频带增高而增强的特征;从第1频带到第5频带,新生儿与成人TEOAE强度的差值随频带增高也逐渐增大.结论 成人TEOAE总强度低于新生儿.新生儿频带信噪比及半倍频程能量反应峰的分布频率及反应强度均高于成人.