High-dose intraoperative radiotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: The results of high-dose intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and/or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for unresectable pancreatic cancer were analyzed to evaluate the possible advantages of IORT in combination with EBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1983 and 1993, 115 patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (53 with non-Stage IV disease and 62 with Stage IV disease) were treated with EBRT + IORT (55 patients), EBRT alone (44 patients), or IORT alone (16 patients). In non-Stage IV patients, the use of EBRT alone was due to the unavailability of IORT and the use of IORT alone was due to refusal of EBRT. The IORT dose was 30-33 Gy and the EBRT dose was 40-60 Gy. A historical control group comprised of 101 patients undergoing palliative surgery alone was also analyzed. RESULTS: Both non-Stage IV and Stage IV patients receiving EBRT with or without IORT had a better prognosis than the nonirradiated historical controls. Among non-Stage IV patients, the median survival of the EBRT + IORT group (8.5 months) and the EBRT group (8 months) was similar, although survival from 12 to 18 months was higher in the former group (38% vs. 10% at 12 months, p = 0.018, and 19% vs. 0% at 18 months, p = 0.023). In Stage IV patients, the prognosis was not influenced by the type of radiotherapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that a pretreatment carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level < 1000 U/ml was associated with better survival. In non-Stage IV patients with a CA 19-9 level < 1000 U/ ml, EBRT + IORT appeared to produce a better survival than EBRT alone (p = 0.047). This was supported by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: High-dose IORT + EBRT may be more effective than EBRT alone in patients with unresectable but localized pancreatic cancer and a low CA 19-9 level.     

Analysis of the clinical benefit of intraoperative radiotherapy in patients undergoing macroscopically curative resection for pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the survival of pancreatic cancer patients treated with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and/or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) following macroscopically curative resection. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients with pancreatic cancer who had undergone potentially curative total or regional pancreatectomy between 1980 and 1997 were retrospectively analyzed. Among the 138 patients, 98 had a pathologically negative surgical margin and the remaining 40 patients had a positive surgical margin. The usual EBRT dose was 45-55 Gy with a daily fraction of 1.5-2.0 Gy. The median IORT dose was 25 Gy in a single fraction. RESULTS: The 2-year cause-specific survival rate of patients with pathologically negative surgical margins was 19%, and that of patients with positive margins was 4% (p < 0.005). Although the median survival time (MST) of patients with negative margins treated with IORT and EBRT was significantly longer than that of those treated with operation alone (17 vs. 11 months), no significant difference in survival curves was observed. In patients with positive surgical margins in peripancreatic soft tissue, the difference between the survival curve of patients treated with surgery alone and that of those treated with surgery and radiation therapy was borderline significant (p < 0.10). Patients receiving intraarterial or intraportal infusion chemotherapy had significantly improved survival rates compared with those who did not receive it (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although the MST was longer in patients with negative margins receiving IORT and EBRT than in those receiving no radiation, improved long-term survival by IORT and/or EBRT was not suggested. In patients with positive margins, our results obtained by IORT/EBRT were encouraging. Randomized studies with much higher patient numbers are necessary to define the role of IORT in curatively resected pancreatic cancer.     

IORT在不可切除局部晚期胰腺癌治疗中作用

目的 探讨电子线IORT在不可切除局部晚期胰腺癌中的价值。方法 回顾分析2009—2014年本院行电子线IORT的不可切除局部晚期胰腺癌共167例患者的OS期、LR率、不良反应。IORT剂量10~20 Gy。术后12例体外照射、56例同步CRT、17例化疗。Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率,Logrank法检验差异和单因素预后分析,Cox模型多因素预后分析。结果 随访率100%。中位OS期10.3个月,2年OS率为22.0%。中位PFS 6.3个月,2年PFS率为9.9%。CSS期11.2个月,2年CSS率为23.6%。仅行IORT时,<15 Gy、15 Gy和>15 Gy的中位OS及1年OS率分别为6.2个月和10.0%、9.1个月和39.6%、22.2个月和74.4%(P=0.000)。术后辅助治疗模式中IORT+CRT的中位OS期11.6个月,生存最佳(P=0.033)。单因素分析显示IORT剂量、肿瘤大小和限光筒直径为影响预后因素(P=0.000、0.006、0.007),多因素分析显示IORT联合术后放疗、IORT剂量为影响预后因素(P=0.006、0.000)。结论 对于不可切除局部晚期胰腺癌,电子线IORT是安全有效治疗手段,避开胃肠组织前提下适当增加剂量可提高疗效,术后CRT可更好延长生存且不增加不良反应。     

Radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer]

We have been using external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for both resectable and unresectable pancreatic cancer patients. EBRT (50-60 Gy) was combined with IORT (25-33 Gy) whenever possible, but otherwise EBRT or IORT was given alone. In patients with unresectable tumor but no distant metastasis, the median survival time (MST) was 7.5 months (M) for the EBRT group and 9 M for the EBRT+IORT group. These MST's were significantly longer than the MST of 3 M of patients who had been treated without radiation (historical control). In non-Stage IV patients undergoing non-curative resection, the MST was 12.5 M for the EBRT group, 15.5 M for the EBRT+IORT group, and 7 M for the historical control. In patients undergoing macroscopic curative resection, the MST was 14 M for the EBRT group, 10 M for the EBRT+IORT group, and 10.5 M for the historical control. In Stage IV patients (with distant metastasis), the MST was 4.5 M for the EBRT group, 4 M for the EBRT+IORT group, 2 M for the IORT group, and 2.5 M for the historical control. Thus, radiotherapy appeared useful especially in non-Stage IV patients undergoing non-curative or no resection. A decrease or relief of pain was obtained in 90% of patients with unresectable lesions. Radiotherapy seems to play an important role in the treatment of pancreatic cancer but more aggressive combined treatment seems to be necessary to further improve the dismal prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients.     

术中和体外照射治疗晚期胰腺癌

目的 :分析不能手术切除的晚期胰腺癌术中放射 (IORT)和体外放射 (EBRT)治疗的疗效。方法 :回顾我院 1987- 1999年 75例不能手术切除的晚期胰腺癌患者进行单纯IORT、单纯EBRT和IORT加EBRT治疗的临床资料。结果 :单纯IORT、单纯EBRT和IORT加EBRT治疗的 1年生存率分别为15 2 %、14 3%和 31 8% ,IORT加EBRT治疗的结果优于前两者 ,P <0 0 5。结论 :IORT加EBRT治疗可以延长晚期胰腺癌患者的生存期     

胰腺癌术中放射治疗的价值

目的：回顾总结诸多放射治疗方式对胰腺癌治疗的价值。方法：1986－1999年间收治的无法手术切除的晚期胰腺癌患者68例，伴有严理和中度腹背痛的65例作为研究对象，其中无腹背痛的3例除外，单纯接受术中放射治疗25例，术中放射治疗加体外放射治疗20例，单纯体外放射治疗20例，另外单纯手术治疗胰腺癌30例作对照。结果：（1）单纯术中放射治疗组患者背痛和腹痛的完全缓解率为47％，部分缓解率为34％，总疼痛缓解率为81％，术后2周内见效，中位生存期为5．9个月（从治疗开始计算）。（2）术中放射治疗加体外放射治疗组患者背痛和腹痛的缓解率同单纯疗后4周左右见效，中位生存期是4．5个月。（4）单纯手术治疗组中位生期7个月。结论：术中放射治疗加体外放射治疗能明显延长晚期胰腺癌患者的生存期，而且能明显缓解患者的疼痛，见效快，提高了患者的生活质量。     

Intraoperative and conformal external-beam radiation therapy with protracted 5-fluorouracil infusion in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy is widely used for patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to clarify the efficacy and feasibility of chemoradiotherapy with more intensive radiotherapy in these patients, using a combination of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), conformal external-beam radiaotherapy (EBRT), and protracted 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). METHODS: Thirty patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma were enrolled in this Phase II study. The treatment consisted of IORT (25 grays [Gy]), followed by EBRT (40 Gy in 20 fractions, 5 times per week), and concurrent protracted 5-FU infusion (200 mg/m(2)), beginning 2-4 weeks after IORT. The authors evaluated the efficacy and adverse effects of this treatment by following up patients for 12.0-28.1 months. Survival from the date of IORT was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: In 11 of the 30 patients, metastatic spread was detected in the abdominal cavity at laparotomy. The full EBRT dose was administered in 28 of the 30 patients. Of the remaining 2 patients, EBRT was terminated at 8 Gy due to progression of brain metastasis and another patient did not receive EBRT or chemotherapy due to massive ascites after IORT. The overall response rate for primary pancreatic tumor on dynamic computed tomography scan was 23.3% (7 partial responses). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) was observed in 15 of the 28 patients who received the full irradiation dose (53.6%). These included anorexia, nausea, emesis, fatigue, leukopenia, and/or elevation of transaminase levels. There were no directly treatment-related deaths, but 1 patient died of hepatic failure related to late effects of irradiation after 25.6 months. The median survival time of the 30 patients was 7.8 months and the 2-year survival rate was 8.1%. The median survival time of the 19 patients without metastatic spread in the abdominal cavity was 12.9 months and that of the 11 patients with metastatic spread was 5.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: The present regimen of chemoradiotherapy is not superior to conventional chemoradiotherapy (EBRT and 5-FU) for patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.     

A phase I/II study of a hypoxic cell radiosensitizer KU-2285 in combination with intraoperative radiotherapy.

A fluorinated 2-nitroimidazole radiosensitizer KU-2285 was given before intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) to 30 patients with unresectable, unresected or macroscopic residual tumours. Twenty-three patients had pancreatic cancer and five had osteosarcoma. The IORT dose was 30 Gy for unresectable pancreatic cancer and 60 Gy for osteosarcoma. The dose of KU-2285 administered ranged from 1 to 9 g m-2. Four patients received a dose of 9 g m-2, and ten received 6.8-7 g m-2. All patients tolerated KU-2285 well, and no drug-related toxicity was observed. The average tumour concentration of KU-2285 immediately after IORT was 166 microg g-1 at dose of 6.8-7 g m-2 and 333 microg g-1 at 9 g m-2. The average tumour-plasma ratio was > or = 0.82. Eleven patients with unresectable but localized pancreatic cancer treated with KU-2285 plus IORT and external beam radiotherapy had a median survival time of 11 months and 1-year local control rate of 50%, which compares favourably with those of 8 months (P = 0.26) and 28% (P = 0.10) for 22 matched historical control patients. The five patients with osteosarcoma attained local control. The results of this first study on KU-2285 and IORT appear encouraging, and further studies of this compound seem to be warranted.     

Survival after attempted surgical resection and intraoperative radiation therapy for pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate a single institution's experience with intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in combination with attempted surgical resection for pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From May 1986 until June 2001, 77 patients at LDS Hospital underwent attempted surgical resection and IORT for pancreatic or periampullary adenocarcinoma. A potentially curative resection was defined as surgery with negative or microscopic positive margins. No patients had metastatic disease at the time of surgery and IORT. Forty-four patients with tumors located in the pancreas and 9 patients with periampullary tumors underwent potentially curative surgical resection and IORT. Twenty-four patients had pancreatic tumors deemed unresectable and underwent surgical bypass and IORT. Actuarial survival was calculated from the date of IORT until last follow-up or death by use of the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Patients undergoing a potentially curative resection and IORT for periampullary adenocarcinoma had a median survival of 167 months and a 56% 5-year actuarial survival, compared with a median survival of 16 months and a 19% 5-year actuarial survival for patients undergoing the same treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (p = 0.03). Patients with unresectable disease who underwent bypass and IORT had a median survival of 11 months and a 0% 3-year survival, significantly worse than patients able to undergo surgical resection and IORT (p = 0.0002). The operative mortality for all patients undergoing potentially curative resection and IORT was 3.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative radiation therapy is well tolerated and does not increase the morbidity or mortality of potentially curative surgical resection for pancreatic or periampullary adenocarcinoma. Patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma have a better prognosis than those with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and patients with unresectable pancreatic disease fared worse.     

Radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer: eleven year experience at the JCRT

Radiation therapy (XRT) for 41 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer resulted in a median survival of 7.0 months. There was no difference in median survival for patients receiving external beam alone (3500 to 5600 cGy) (n = 28), intraoperative (IORT) boost plus external beam (5040 to 6750 cGy) (n = 9), or a gold-198 implant +/- external beam radiation (n = 4). A pilot study using orthovoltage IORT boost indicates no acute toxicity with doses of 1250 to 1750 cGy. Serious late damage has not been observed in any patients followed to 2 years. Local recurrence in patients treated post-operatively after "radical" surgery occurred in one of 10 (10%). This adjuvant treatment is safe and appears to improve local control rates compared to historical data, but survival is still poor. The median survival for the post-operative group is 10 months; three patients are alive without disease 8 months to 8.3 years after treatment.     

Moderate dose intraoperative and external beam radiotherapy for locally recurrent rectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Late adverse effects (i.e. neuropathy, chronic bowel obstruction) limit the effective dose given in intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Initial results of a multi-modality treatment approach using moderate dose IORT and moderate dose EBRT are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients with recurrent rectal carcinomas had IORT and EBRT after complete (R0, n = 14) or incomplete resection (R1, n = 9; R2, n = 8). The mean [ORT dose was 13.7 Gy (range 12-20 Gy) supplemented with an EBRT dose of 41.4 Gy. Twenty-two patients had preoperative EBRT and 22 patients had concomitant chemotherapy (5-FU, Leucovorine). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 28 months, 16 patients had re-recurrent disease and 11 patients had died. Nine patients failed locally (four in-field, four marginal and one anastomotic re-recurrence), three combined with distant metastasis, resulting in overall and IORT infield local control rates of 71% and 87%, respectively. Distant metastases alone were found in seven patients. The 4-year overall and relapse-free survival rates were 58% and 48%, respectively. After incomplete resection the local failure rate increased (R0 21%, R1/2 35%) and the 4-year relapse-free survival rate decreased significantly (29% versus 71%) due to a markedly increased distant metastasis rate (53% versus 7%). Acute and late toxicities were not increased. CONCLUSION: The combination of moderate dose IORT and EBRT is a safe and efficacious component in a multi-modality treatment approach.     

Tumor response and patterns of failure following intraoperative radiotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer--evaluation by computed tomography

Tumor response and patterns of failure following intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of 42 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancers were evaluated by computed tomography (CT). At the time of maximum tumor regression, the tumor response rate following IORT was 52%, with three tumors showing CR. The median time of maximum tumor regression was 3 months after IORT. When tumor response was evaluated within 2 months of IORT, no significant difference in survival rate between responders and non-responders was noted. However, when tumor response was evaluated 3-6 months after IORT, the responders showed a significantly better survival rate than the non-responders. Local tumor recurrence, liver metastasis, and peritoneal dissemination were major causes of failure after IORT for unresectable pancreatic cancers. In addition, the median time of detection of these findings by CT was 2-3 months after IORT. Thus, our results indicate that CT performed 3-4 months after IORT is most important for predicting clinical outcome.     

Surgical management of retroperitoneal sarcomas associated with external and intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy.

AIMS: To report outcomes of adults with retroperitoneal sarcoma (RS) treated by surgery, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IORT). METHODS: From July 1988 to February 2001; 24 patients with primary and recurrent RS were diagnosed and treated. The median dose and energy of IORT delivered was 15 Gy/9meV. EBRT dose varies between 45-50 Gy. RESULTS: There were five primary and 19 recurrent tumours. One primary and five recurrent tumours underwent R0 resection. There were 12 liposarcomas and 19 grade I tumours; 13 patients developed local recurrence and three developed distant metastases.Twenty-two patients received IORT associated with EBRT: 11 developed recurrences. Six patients developed Neurotoxicity (4 grade II and 2 grade III). Disease free survival and overall survival at 5 years was 28 and 56% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EBRT with IORT treatment is a promising technique for local control. Lower recurrence rates are associated with radical (R0) surgical procedures.     

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for breast cancer using the Intrabeam system

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with low-energy X-rays (30-50 KV) is an innovative technique that can be used both for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and intraoperative boosting in patients affected by breast cancer. Immediately after tumor resection the tumor bed can be treated with low-distance X-rays by a single high dose. Whereas often a geographic miss in covering the boost target occurs with external beam boost radiotherapy (EBRT), the purpose of IORT is to cover the tumor bed safely. This report will focus on the feasibility and technical aspects of the Intrabeam device and will summarize our experience with side effects and local control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2002 and June 2003 57 breast cancer patients, all eligible for breast conserving surgery (BCS), were treated at the Mannheim Medical Center with IORT using the mobile X-ray system Intrabeam. The patient population in this feasibility study was not homogeneous consisting of 49 patients with primary stage I or II breast cancer, seven with local recurrence after previous EBRT and one with a second primary in a previously irradiated breast. The selection criteria for referral for IORT included tumor size, tumor cavity size, margin status and absence of an extensive intraductal component. The previously irradiated patients with local recurrences and 16 others received IORT as single modality. In all other cases IORT was followed by EBRT with a total dose of 46 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. The intraoperatively delivered dose after tumor resection was 20 Gy prescribed to the applicator surface. EBRT was delivered with a standard two-tangential-field technique using linear accelerators with 6- or 18-MV photons. Patients were assessed every three months by their radiation oncologist or surgeon during the first year after treatment and every six months thereafter. Breast ultrasound for follow-up was done every six months and mammographies once yearly. Acute side effects were scored according to the CTC/EORTC score and late side effects according to the Lent-Soma classification. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received IORT only; eight patients because they had received previous radiotherapy, 16 because of a very favorable risk profile or their own preference. Thirty-three patients with tumor sizes between 1 and 30 mm and no risk factors were treated by IORT as a boost followed by EBRT. The Intrabeam system was used for IORT. The Intrabeam source produces 30-50 KV X-rays and the prescribed dose is delivered in an isotropic dose distribution around spherical applicators. Treatment time ranged between 20 and 48 minutes. No severe acute side effects or complications were observed during the first postoperative days or after 12 months. One local recurrence occurred 10 months after surgery plus IORT followed by EBRT. In two patients distant metastases were diagnosed shortly after BCS. DISCUSSION: IORT with the Intrabeam system is a feasible method to deliver a single high radiation dose to breast cancer patients. As a preliminary boost it has the advantage of reducing the EBRT course by 1.5 weeks, and as APBI it might be a promising tool for patients with a low risk of recurrence. The treatment is well tolerated and does not cause greater damage than the expected late reaction in normal tissue.     

Intraoperative radiation therapy for patients with recurrent rectal and sigmoid colon cancer in previously irradiated fields.

A retrospective study evaluated 15 patients with pelvic recurrence of colorectal cancer in a previously irradiated region who received intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as part of salvage therapy. Total prior external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) doses ranged from 45 to 79.2 Gy. Tumor resection was accomplished in 14 patients, with an exenteration performed in seven. IORT dose was 15-20 Gy. Three patients received additional EBRT as a post-operative course of 25.2 Gy in 14 fractions. Actuarial 3-year local control rate was 25%. The 3-year overall survival rate was 29%. Patients with fixed and/or bulky pelvic tumors had a local control rate of 19% at 12 months and median overall survival of 9 months. Patients with less extensive clinical presentations of anastomotic non-fixed transmural recurrence, isolated pelvic node metastasis and rectal recurrence following local excision had a local control rate of 42% at 36 months and median survival of 43 months. We conclude that clinical presentation of recurrent disease is an important prognostic factor. The value of IORT may be limited to patients with less extensive clinical presentations.     

A phase III randomized trial of combined chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

A phase III randomized trial was conducted to investigate whether induction chemotherapy followed by radiation can influence survival as compared with radiation alone in unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LADNSCLC). A total of 101 patients with unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC were enrolled. Patients were stratified by performance status, weight loss, histology and stage, and then randomized to receive combined chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone. Radiotherapy was administered in 1.8 Gy to 2.0 Gy standard fractions daily 5 times weekly for a total dose of 60 Gy to 65 Gy. The combined group received induction of cisplatin, etoposide, and vinblastine (PEV) chemotherapy with cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5, etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 2 to 4, and vinblastine 6 mg/m2 on day 1, which wasrepeated every 3 weeks for 3 courses, after which time the patients underwent radiotherapy. Of 101 patients registered, 89 patients (43 combined, 46 radiotherapy alone) were eligible for analysis. The response rates for the combined and radiotherapy groups were 65% (28/43) and 70% (32/46), respectively. The median survival time (MST) showed a tendency to be more prolonged in the combined group than in the group receiving radiotherapy alone (13.8 vs. 8.5 months). The MST in patients with nonsquamous histology was strikingly prolonged in the combined group as compared with the radiotherapy group (14 vs. 3.6 months, p 0.027). Likewise, the MST in patients with stage IIIB was significantly prolonged in the combined group as compared with the radiotherapy group (11.1 vs. 7.2 months, p 0.045). Together, the MST of the high-risk group with nonsquamous or stage IIIB was significantly higher in the combined group than that seen in the radiotherapy group (11.6 vs. 8 months, p 0.046), whereas the MST of the low-risk group, defined as having both squamous histology and stage IIIA, was similar in the two treatment groups (18.3 vs. 20.8 months, p = 0.293). In conclusion, induction PEV chemotherapy plus radiotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in high-risk subsets of unresectable LAD-NSCLC and therapeutic strategy should be based on the identification of prognostic factors.     

Ic期子宫内膜癌患者中MPA和EBRT的联合疗效

Objective: To report the comparative effect of combined medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and external beam pelvic radiotherapy (EBRT) with EBRT alone on local or distant recurrences, overall survival and treatment related toxicities in patients with stage Ic grade 3 endometrial cancer. Methods: A retrospective review of 80 International Federation of Gyne-cology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage Ic grade 3 endometrial carcinoma patients treated between October 1994 and October 2004 at Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, China was performed. All patients underwent surgery, of which 40 patients in arm I received combined MPA and EBRT while in arm II 40 patients received only adjuvant EBRT after surgery. The median dose of EBRT in arm I was 50 Gy (range 36-54 Gy) and in arm II was 45.2 Gy (range 43.2-50.4 Gy). Multivariate analysis was performed for the prognostic factors and Kaplan-Meier method was used for overall survival. Results: Of the 80 eligible patients, 40 in each group could be evaluated. The follow-up times ranged from 4-98 months with a median of 45 months. The overall survival rates at five years were 73% among patients treated with combined MPA and EBRT and 28.2% among patients treated with EBRT alone (P < 0.001). The rate of distant metastasis was significantly higher among patients treated with EBRT alone group than combined MPA and EBRT (55% vs 25%, P = 0.006) while no difference in loco regional recur-rence rates was observed in both treatment groups. Most of the side effects observed in the combined MPA and EBRT group. Age (P < 0.001) and the presence of progesterone receptors (P = 0.003) were independent significant prognostic factors for overall survival in multiple regression analysis. Conclusion: We has been concluded that the addition of progestagen to external beam pelvic radiotherapy significantly improved survival and reduced distant metastasis among women with stage Ic grade 3 endometrial cancer.     

Definitive radiotherapy for patients with isolated vaginal recurrence of endometrial carcinoma after hysterectomy

PURPOSE: To determine the outcome of patients after radical radiotherapy (RT) for isolated vaginal recurrence of endometrial carcinoma and to determine the clinical and pathologic predictors of outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed the records of 91 patients treated at our institution between 1960 and 1997 with radical RT for vaginal recurrence after definitive surgery for endometrial carcinoma. Thirty-one percent of the patients received external beam RT (EBRT) alone, 12% received brachytherapy alone, and 57% received a combination. The median dose of radiation was 75 Gy (range 34-122). All end points were measured from the time of the first recurrence. The median duration of follow-up after recurrence was 58 months (range 1-289). RESULTS: The 2- and 5-year local control (LC) rate and overall survival rate was 82% and 75% and 69% and 43%, respectively. The median time from initial diagnosis of endometrial cancer to death from disease was 38 months. On univariate analysis, a dose to the relapse site of > or =80 Gy and EBRT plus brachytherapy vs. single-modality therapy were significant predictors of improved LC. On multivariate analysis, only the type of treatment correlated significantly with LC (p = 0.03). On univariate analysis, Grade 1 or 2 vs. Grade 3 tumor and EBRT plus brachytherapy vs. single-modality therapy were significant predictors of improved overall survival. CONCLUSION: RT provides excellent LC of isolated vaginal recurrences of endometrial carcinoma, particularly when high doses are given using a combination of EBRT and brachytherapy. However, distant metastases frequently develop despite local disease control, contributing to a 5-year overall survival rate of <50%. For patients who have an isolated vaginal recurrence, the time from initial diagnosis of endometrial cancer to death from disease is usually >3 years. For this reason, in studies of adjuvant RT, long-term follow-up is required to permit evaluation of the impact of treatment on survival.     

Treatment of recurrent gynecologic malignancies with iodine-125 permanent interstitial irradiation

PURPOSE: To analyze the outcome of permanent 125I interstitial radiotherapy for unresectable retroperitoneal recurrences of gynecologic malignancies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of 20 patients treated between 1979 and 1993 was performed to evaluate survival and morbidity associated with the interstitial 125I technique. RESULTS: Nineteen tumors were located on the lateral pelvic wall and one in the para-aortic region. Eight patients, not previously irradiated, received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) along with 125I interstitial implants placed at the time of celiotomy. Nineteen (95%) are dead of disease at 1-69 months of follow-up. The median survival was 7.7 months for patients treated with 125I alone and 25.4 months for those treated with both 125I and EBRT. One patient is alive without evidence of disease 69 months after 125I implantation. Fistulas, bowel obstructions, and fatal complications occurred only among patients previously irradiated. CONCLUSIONS: When used in a previously irradiated field, 125I interstitial radiotherapy has major morbidity and is unlikely to be associated with cure or long-term survival. In radiotherapy-naive patients with unresectable isolated recurrent gynecologic malignancies, 125I implants and EBRT are feasible and occasionally may contribute to long-term disease-free survival.     

Control of aftereffects due to intraoperative radiotherapy

In cases of treating a pancreatic cancer, an aneurysm and thrombus of the abdominal aorta, necrosis of the vertebral body, and damage to the peripheral nerves can be caused by intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT). These aftereffects have been observed in tests conducted in experimental animal reported by Colorado State University. Similarly, our clinical experiences have led us to set safety guidelines to prevent damage due to IORT. The safety level of a radiation dose for IORT alone is limited to 30 Gy, and for IORT combined with external beam radiotherapy, from 20 Gy (IORT) plus 50 Gy (EBRT). Using these parameters, among 58 cases of a pancreatic tumor treated by IORT, only one case subsequently developed a pseudoaneurysm at the stump of splenic artery.