Residual neuromuscular blockade: incidence, assessment, and relevance in the postoperative period

The residual effects of neuromuscular blocking agents may persist into the early postoperative recovery period, even when neuromuscular blockade is carefully monitored and reversed in the operating room. Recent data suggest that mild degrees of residual paresis (train-of-four TOF ratios of 0.7-0.9) may be associated with significant impairment of respiratory and pharyngeal muscle function. Therefore, the new gold standard reflecting acceptable neuromuscular recovery is a TOF ratio > or =0.9. Several investigations have demonstrated that many patients continue to arrive in the postanesthesia care unit with TOF ratios <0.7-0.9. Several techniques may be used to reduce the risk of postoperative residual paresis, which include avoidance of long-acting muscle relaxants, use of neuromuscular monitoring in the operating room, routine reversal of neuromuscular blockade at a TOF count of 2-3, and early administration of reversal agents. Careful management of neuromuscular blockade may limit the occurrence of adverse events associated with residual postoperative paralysis. Large-scale outcome studies are needed to clearly define the impact of residual neuromuscular block on major morbidity and mortality in surgical patients.     

Enquête sur les modalités de la curarisation et la décurarisation au Maroc

Objective

To determine current clinical neuromuscular use in Morocco anesthetic practice.

Study design

Clinical practice survey.

Methods

Anesthesiologists were invited to answer anonymously to question about neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA): pharmacology, monitoring and antagonism drug use. Corrected yates test was used to compare qualitative parameters and variance analysis for quantitative parameters. P < 0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

We had 171 answers, 54% were paramedics (n = 93) and 46% (n = 78) were physicians (20% global effective in Morocco). Fifty-five percent were seniors. Vecuronium was the most NMBA used in Morocco for 51% of the anesthesiologists. Mean action time of NMBA was underestimate in more than 60% of the staff questioned specially for seniors (24.6%) than juniors (19.2%). Residual neuromuscular blockade was evaluated only by clinical and spirometric parameters in 72%. TOF monitor was used in 18% more in military hospitals (36%) and insurance clinics (40%) than private hospitals (12.5%). Administration of reversal drugs was systematic in 5.8% of anesthesiologists, frequent for 36.3% and rare for 55%.

Conclusions

This study show an underestimation of residual neuromuscular blockade, poor neuromuscular monitor use and lack of knowledge of NMBA specially for senior anesthesiologists and in private hospitals. We should elaborate Moroccan guideline for NMBA use and provide formal training programs for our anesthetic staff.     

Postoperative residual paralysis in outpatients versus inpatients

Postoperative residual paralysis is an important complication of the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs. In this prospective study, the incidence of residual paralysis detected as a train-of-four response <90% was less frequent in surgical outpatients (38%) than inpatients (47%) (P = 0.001). This might have been the result of the more frequent use of mivacurium for outpatients. Before undertaking tracheal extubation, the anesthesiologists had applied clinical criteria (outpatients, 49%; inpatients, 45%), pharmacological reversal (26%, 25%), neuromuscular transmission monitoring (12%, 11%), or a combination of these. None of these measures seemed to reduce the incidence of residual paralysis except for quantitative train-of-four monitoring. Postoperatively, eight individual clinical tests or a sum of these tests were also unable to predict residual paralysis by train-of-four. Although the incidence of residual paralysis was less frequent in surgical outpatients, predictive criteria were not evident.     

The use of neuromuscular blocking drugs in adult cardiac surgery: results of a national postal survey

Available data suggest that the choice of neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) can influence early clinical recovery of the fast-track cardiac surgical patient. The aim of this study was to use a survey tool to determine practice patterns of anesthesiologists for the use of NMBDs in the cardiac surgical setting. We mailed a survey to one third of the 3295 active members of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. A follow-up letter and survey were sent to each individual who did not respond to the initial mailing. After the second mailing, 459 surveys were returned, yielding a response rate of 43%. Pancuronium was listed as the primary NMBD used in the majority of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (69%) and off-pump (41%) procedures. Only 28% of respondents routinely used a peripheral nerve stimulator to monitor neuromuscular blockade in the operating room. Residual neuromuscular blockade was routinely reversed before tracheal extubation by only 9% of cardiac anesthesiologists. This survey demonstrates that long-acting NMBDs are often administered to fast-track cardiac patients. Peripheral nerve stimulator monitoring is rarely used in the operating room or intensive care unit, and reversal drugs (anticholinesterases) are infrequently administered in the postoperative period. IMPLICATIONS: This postal survey of cardiac anesthesiologists demonstrates that long-acting muscle relaxants are frequently administered to fast-track cardiac surgical patients. Neuromuscular blockade is rarely monitored or reversed in this patient population.     

Residual paralysis in the PACU after a single intubating dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action

BACKGROUND: Residual neuromuscular blockade remains a problem even after short surgical procedures. The train-of-four (TOF) ratio at the adductor pollicis required to avoid residual paralysis is now considered to be at least 0.9. The incidence of residual paralysis using this new threshold is not known, especially after a single intubating dose of intermediate-duration nondepolarizing relaxant. Therefore, the aim of the study was to determine the incidence of residual paralysis in the postanesthesia care unit after a single intubating dose of twice the ED(95) of a nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action. METHODS: Five hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled. They received a single dose of vecuronium, rocuronium, or atracurium to facilitate tracheal intubation and received no more relaxant thereafter. Neuromuscular blockade was not reversed at the end of the procedure. On arrival in the postanesthesia care unit, the TOF ratio was measured at the adductor pollicis, using acceleromyography. Head lift, tongue depressor test, and manual assessment of TOF and DBS fade were also performed. The time delay between the injection of muscle relaxant and quantitative measurement of neuromuscular blockade was calculated from computerized anesthetic records. RESULTS: The TOF ratios less than 0.7 and 0.9 were observed in 16% and 45% of the patients, respectively. Two hundred thirty-nine patients were tested 2 h or more after the administration of the muscle relaxant. Ten percent of these patients had a TOF ratio less than 0.7, and 37% had a TOF ratio less than 0.9. Clinical tests (head lift and tongue depressor) and manual assessment of fade showed a poor sensitivity (11-14%) to detect residual blockade (TOF < 0.9). CONCLUSION: After a single dose of intermediate-duration muscle relaxant and no reversal, residual paralysis is common, even more than 2 h after the administration of muscle relaxant. Quantitative measurement of neuromuscular transmission is the only recommended method to diagnose residual block.     

Neuromuscular monitoring: methods and machines

Muscle relaxing agents are clinically in use for general anaesthesia to optimize the conditions to the endotracheal intubation as well as the surgical conditions. Therefore different musclerelaxants with specific pharmacological characteristics are available. Many factors that depend on the condition of the patient and the used musclerelaxant agent influence the duration of the neuromuscular blockade. Rapid reversal of their effects, particularly in cases of profound blockades, proved to be difficult. In cases of postoperative residual paralysis hypoxic complications because of failure of the ventilation increase the morbidity and mortality of the perioperative period. To avoid these complications in cause of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade it seems to be necessary to evaluate the status of the muscle function. For the tactile or visual assessment or the objective measurement of stimulation the train-of-four (TOF), double-burst (DBS) or tetanus-stimulation of peripheral nerves like the ulnar nerve may be used. Established methods for the objective monitoring of neuromuscular function is the mechanomyography (MMG), the acceleromyography (AMG), the electromyography (EMG), the kinemyography (KMG) and the phonomyography (PMG). A sufficient recovery of the neuromuscular transmission is reached to a TOF-ratio of 0,9 and should be aimed before the extubation at the end of surgery. No subjective evaluation of the neuromuscular recovery is able to identify residual paralysis above a TOF-ratio of 0,5. Recent studies suggest that objective methods should be used to monitor neuromuscular function to avoid postoperative residual blockades.     

Retrospective analysis of spontaneous recovery from neuromuscular blockade produced by empirical use of rocuronium

Purpose  

A train-of-four ratio (TOF ratio) of >0.9 should be the clinical cut-off to avoid residual paralysis. However, it is not rare to extubate patients without measurement of the TOF ratio, although the safe interval from the last administration of rocuronium assuring a TOF ratio of >0.9 has not been established in the daily clinical setting. In this study, to estimate the safe interval to avoid residual paralysis, we retrospectively selected patients in whom the TOF ratio was measured during remifentanil administration before extubation, and we studied the characteristics of recovery from the neuromuscular blockade produced by the empirical use of rocuronium.     

The use of neuromuscular monitoring in Germany

AIM: As there are no reliable epidemiological data for the use of muscle relaxants in Germany,we conducted a mailing study. The aim of the study was to compare the use of muscle relaxants between German anaesthesia departments. In the present part of the presentation we focused on neuromuscular monitoring (NMM) and management of residual paralysis. METHODS: A total number of 2,996 questionnaires were sent to all registered anaesthesiological facilities in Germany and the return was 68.6% (2054 questionnaires). RESULTS: In 574 of the returned questionnaires (28%) the regular use of NMM was confirmed. Intraoperative monitoring of neuromuscular block and assessment of neuromuscular recovery were the most frequent applications of NMM, i.e. 25% and 18% of returned questionnaires, respectively. Clinical signs, however, are still the most popular way to estimate the degree of neuromuscular blockade. Moreover, routine reversal at the end of surgery with a neostigmin/atropine mixture was not practiced in 75% of the anaesthesia departments. CONCLUSIONS: This survey revealed that NMM is still very rarely used in daily clinical practice. Especially the seldom use of NMM to assess residual paralysis has to be improved.     

Residual Paralysis in the PACU after a Single Intubating Dose of Nondepolarizing Muscle Relaxant with an Intermediate Duration of Action

Background: Residual neuromuscular blockade remains a problem even after short surgical procedures. The train-of-four (TOF) ratio at the adductor pollicis required to avoid residual paralysis is now considered to be at least 0.9. The incidence of residual paralysis using this new threshold is not known, especially after a single intubating dose of intermediate-duration nondepolarizing relaxant. Therefore, the aim of the study was to determine the incidence of residual paralysis in the postanesthesia care unit after a single intubating dose of twice the ED95 of a nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action.

Methods: Five hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled. They received a single dose of vecuronium, rocuronium, or atracurium to facilitate tracheal intubation and received no more relaxant thereafter. Neuromuscular blockade was not reversed at the end of the procedure. On arrival in the postanesthesia care unit, the TOF ratio was measured at the adductor pollicis, using acceleromyography. Head lift, tongue depressor test, and manual assessment of TOF and DBS fade were also performed. The time delay between the injection of muscle relaxant and quantitative measurement of neuromuscular blockade was calculated from computerized anesthetic records.

Results: The TOF ratios less than 0.7 and 0.9 were observed in 16% and 45% of the patients, respectively. Two hundred thirty-nine patients were tested 2 h or more after the administration of the muscle relaxant. Ten percent of these patients had a TOF ratio less than 0.7, and 37% had a TOF ratio less than 0.9. Clinical tests (head lift and tongue depressor) and manual assessment of fade showed a poor sensitivity (11-14%) to detect residual blockade (TOF < 0.9).     

Is the diagnosis of significant residual neuromuscular blockade improved by using double-burst nerve stimulation?

This study evaluated the use of double-burst stimulation (DBS) in the diagnosis of significant post-operative residual neuromuscular blockade. Ninety patients were allocated to three equal groups. In Group A the degree of residual neuromuscular blockade was assessed by clinical criteria (CC) only; in Group B by CC and manual evaluation of the response to train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation; and in Group C by CC, manual evaluation of the response to TOF, and DBS stimulation. Immediately after arrival in the recovery room mechanical twitch was recorded using TOF stimulation. The mean (+/- SD) TOF ratios were 0.53 +/- 0.19 in Group A, 0.67 +/- 0.11 in Group B and 0.81 +/- 0.08 in Group C. The incidence of a TOF ratio of less than 0.7 was 83.3% in Group A, 56.7% in Group B and 6.7% in Group C. It is concluded that the use of DBS enabled the anaesthetist to recognize significant residual block and thus reduced the incidence of post-operative residual neuromuscular blockade.     

围术期TOF监测与残余肌松潘库溴铵与维库溴铵的比较

目的研究潘库溴铵与维库溴铵术后残余肌松发生率,探讨围术期应用TOF监测降低术后残余肌松发生率的可行性.方法81例ASAⅠ～Ⅱ级成年择期手术病人,随机分为维库溴铵监测(V+M)组;维库溴铵未监测(V)组;潘库溴铵监测(P+M)组及潘库溴铵未监测(P)组4组.麻醉方法为静脉注射2.0～2.5mg/kg异丙酚,潘库溴铵或维库溴铵0.08～0.12mg/kg,3min后气管插管,麻醉维持应用50%N2O、异氟醚,间断给予芬太尼.使用TOF-GUARD监测仪监测肌松.P+M组和V+M组在TOF计数出现1～2个颤搐反应时给新斯的明0.04mg@kg-1、阿托品0.02mg@kg-1.拮抗;P组和V组根据临床反应判断是否给予拮抗及剂量.观察各组病人到ICU后残余肌松发生率(T4/T1＜0.70)及持续时间.结果4组病人到ICU后残余肌松发生率分别为V+M组23.80%、V组39.13%、P+M组42.11%、P组83.33%,P组残余肌松发生率显著高于V组(P＜0.01),而且监测组残余肌松发生率显著低于未监测组(P＜0.05).4组残余肌松持续时间分别为V+M组(11.11±5.48)min、V组(30.00±15.12)min、P+M组(21.15±11.62)min、P组(44.87±31.39)min,未监测组明显长于监测组(P＜0.05).未监测组潘库溴铵及维库溴铵总的用药量分别大于监测组(P＜0.05).结论1.围术期TOF监测可明显降低残余肌松发生率;2.潘库溴铵残余肌松发生率及持续时间均显著高于维库溴铵,在无神经肌肉功能监测的情况下,应用潘库溴铵应严加注意;3.应用非去极化肌松药阻滞后进行术后肌松拮抗是必要的.     

Intraoperative Acceleromyographic Monitoring Reduces the Risk of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade and Adverse Respiratory Events in the Postanesthesia Care Unit

Background: Incomplete recovery from neuromuscular blockade in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) may contribute to adverse postoperative respiratory events. This study determined the incidence and degree of residual neuromuscular blockade in patients randomized to conventional qualitative train-of-four (TOF) monitoring or quantitative acceleromyographic monitoring. The incidence of adverse respiratory events in the PACU was also evaluated.

Methods: One hundred eighty-five patients were randomized to intraoperative acceleromyographic monitoring (acceleromyography group) or qualitative TOF monitoring (TOF group). Anesthetic management was standardized. TOF patients were extubated when standard criteria were met and no fade was observed during TOF stimulation. Acceleromyography patients had a TOF ratio of greater than 0.80 as an additional extubation criterion. Upon arrival in the PACU, TOF ratios of both groups were measured with acceleromyography. Adverse respiratory events during transport to the PACU and during the first 30 min of PACU admission were also recorded.

Results: A lower frequency of residual neuromuscular blockade in the PACU (TOF ratio <= 0.9) was observed in the acceleromyography group (4.5%) compared with the conventional TOF group (30.0%; P < 0.0001). During transport to the PACU, fewer acceleromyography patients developed arterial oxygen saturation values, measured by pulse oximetry, of less than 90% (0%) or airway obstruction (0%) compared with TOF patients (21.1% and 11.1%, respectively; P < 0.002). The incidence, severity, and duration of hypoxemic events during the first 30 min of PACU admission were less in the acceleromyography group (all P < 0.0001).     

Residual paralysis: a real problem or did we invent a new disease?

Purpose

Over the past three decades, many studies have shown a high proportion of patients in the recovery room with residual neuromuscular blockade after anesthesia. The purpose of this Continuing Professional Development module is to present the physiological consequences of residual paralysis, estimate the extent of the problem, and suggest solutions to prevent its occurrence.

Principal findings

Residual paralysis is defined as a train-of-four ratio (TOFR) < 0.9 at the adductor pollicis. While tidal volume and, to a lesser extent, vital capacity are well preserved as the intensity of blockade increases, the probability of airway obstruction, impaired swallowing, and pulmonary aspiration increases markedly as TOFR decreases. In recent studies, incidences of residual paralysis from 4-57% have been reported, but surveys indicate that anesthesiologists estimate the incidence of the problem at 1% or less. The decision to administer neostigmine or sugammadex should be based on the degree of spontaneous recovery at the adductor pollicis muscle (thumb), not on recovery at the corrugator supercilii (eyebrow). The most important drawback of neostigmine is its inability to reverse profound blockade, which is a consequence of its ceiling effect. When spontaneous recovery reaches the point where TOFR > 0.4 or four equal twitch responses are seen, reduced doses of neostigmine may be given. The dose of sugammadex required in a given situation depends on the intensity of blockade.

Conclusion

Careful monitoring and delaying the administration of neostigmine until four twitches are observed at the adductor pollicis can decrease the incidence of residual paralysis. The clinical and pharmacoeconomic effects of unrestricted sugammadex use are unknown at this time.     

Ventilation and neuromuscular blocking drugs

Ventilatory failure after administration of neuromuscular blocking agents is an important factor in anaesthesia-related perioperative morbidity and mortality. Improved knowledge and new monitoring methods may avoid ventilatory failure caused by incomplete recovery of neuromuscular function in the postoperative period. Central respiratory muscles are less sensitive than, and their time course of neuromuscular block is different from those of, pharyngeal muscles and those of the upper airway. Differences in potency and time course of neuromuscular block may lead to incorrect assessment of ventilatory function during onset and recovery. Even if recovery of the mechanical adductor pollicis train-of-four (TOF) response to a ratio of 0.70 has previously been associated with adequate ventilatory capacity, it is now shown that hypoxic ventilatory responses may be markedly reduced despite adequate respiratory force at a TOF ratio of 0.70. Hence, partial paralysis may interfere with ventilatory regulation in hypoxaemia. Consequently, monitoring neuromuscular function by peripheral nerve stimulation in one muscle yields limited information about total ventilatory capacity, especially the function of the upper airway and ventilatory regulation. Therefore, neuromuscular monitoring should be used with caution during recovery and should always be combined with bedside clinical tests if possible.     

Residual paralysis induced by either vecuronium or rocuronium after reversal with pyridostigmine

We investigated postoperative residual curarization after administration of either vecuronium or rocuronium with reversal by pyridostigmine in 602 consecutive patients without perioperative neuromuscular monitoring. On arrival in the recovery room, neuromuscular function was assessed both by acceleromyography in a train-of-four (TOF) pattern and also clinically by the ability to sustain a head-lift for >5 s and the tongue-depressor test. Postoperative residual curarization was defined as a TOF ratio <0.7. One fifth of 602 patients (vecuronium, 24.7%; rocuronium, 14.7%) had a TOF <0.7 in the recovery room. There were no significant differences in the TOF ratios between 10 mg and 20 mg of pyridostigmine. The patients with residual block had several associated factors: the absence of perioperative neuromuscular monitoring, the use of pyridostigmine, which is less potent than neostigmine, a larger dose of vecuronium, shorter time from the last neuromuscular blocker to TOF monitoring, or peripheral cooling. We conclude that significant residual neuromuscular block after vecuronium or rocuronium was not eliminated even with reversal by a large dose of pyridostigmine. IMPLICATIONS: Without monitoring, the significant residual neuromuscular block after vecuronium or rocuronium is not eliminated even by reversal with a large dose of pyridostigmine and can still be a problem in the recovery room.     

Train-of-four ratio recovery often precedes twitch recovery when neuromuscular block is reversed by sugammadex

Background: Sugammadex reverses rocuronium‐induced neuromuscular block (NMB). In all published studies investigating sugammadex, the primary outcome parameter was a train‐of‐four (TOF) ratio of 0.9. The recovery time of T1 was not described. This retrospective investigation describes the recovery of T1 vs. TOF ratio after the reversal of NMB with sugammadex. Methods: Two studies were analyzed. In study A, a phase II dose‐finding study, ASA I–II patients received an intravenous (IV) dose of rocuronium 1.2 mg/kg, followed by an IV dose of sugammadex (2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 12.0 or 16.0 mg/kg) or placebo (0.9% saline) after 5 min. In study B, a phase III trial comparing patients with renal failure and healthy controls, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was used to induce NMB; sugammadex 2.0 mg/kg was administered at reappearance of T2. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed by acceleromyography and TOF nerve stimulation. The primary efficacy variable was time from the administration of sugammadex to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.9. Retrospectively, the time to recovery of T1 to 90% was calculated. Results: After the reversal of rocuronium‐induced NMB with an optimal dose of sugammadex [16 mg/kg (A) or 2 mg/kg (B)], the TOF ratio recovered to 0.9 significantly faster than T1 recovered to 90%. Clinical signs of residual paralysis were not observed. Conclusion: After the reversal of NMB by sugammadex, full recovery of the TOF ratio is possible when T1 is still depressed. The TOF ratio as the only measurement for the adequate reversal of NMB by sugammadex may not always be reliable. Further investigations for clinical implications are needed.     

Accelerometry of adductor pollicis muscle predicts recovery of respiratory function from neuromuscular blockade

BACKGROUND: Residual paralysis increases the risk of pulmonary complications but is difficult to detect. To test the hypothesis that accelerometry predicts effects of residual paralysis on pulmonary and upper airway function, the authors related tests of pulmonary and pharyngeal function to accelerometry of adductor pollicis muscle in 12 partially paralyzed volunteers. METHODS: Rocuronium (0.01 mg/kg + 2-10 microg x kg-1 x min-1) was administered to maintain train-of-four (TOF) ratios (assessed every 15 s) of approximately 0.5 and 0.8 over a period of more than 5 min. The authors evaluated pharyngeal and facial muscle functions during steady state relaxation and performed spirometric measurements every 5 min until recovery. Upper airway obstruction was defined as a mean ratio of expiratory and inspiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity of greater than 1. The TOF ratio associated with "acceptable" pulmonary recovery (forced vital capacity and forced inspiratory volume in 1 s of > or =90% of baseline) was calculated using a linear regression model. RESULTS: At peak blockade (TOF ratio 0.5 +/- 0.16), forced inspiratory flow was impaired (53 +/- 19%) to a greater degree than forced expiratory flow (75 +/- 20%) with a mean ratio of expiratory and inspiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity of 1.18 +/- 0.6. Upper airway obstruction, observed in 8 of 12 volunteers, paralleled an impaired ability to swallow reported by 10 of 12 volunteers. In contrast, all volunteers except one could sustain a head lift for more than 5 s. The authors calculated that a mean TOF ratio of 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.71) predicts "acceptable" recovery of forced vital capacity, whereas forced inspiratory volume in 1 s was impaired until a TOF ratio of 0.95 (0.82-1.18) was reached. A 100% recovery of TOF ratio predicts an acceptable recovery of forced vital capacity, forced inspiratory volume in 1 s, and mean ratio of expiratory and inspiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity in 93%, 73%, and 88% of measurements (calculated negative predictive values), respectively. CONCLUSION: Impaired inspiratory flow and upper airway obstruction frequently occur during minimal neuromuscular blockade (TOF ratio 0.8), and extubation may put the patient at risk. Although a TOF ratio of unity predicts a high probability of adequate recovery from neuromuscular blockade, respiratory function can still be impaired.     

Single acceleromyographic train-of-four, 100-Hertz tetanus or double-burst stimulation: which test performs better to detect residual paralysis?

BACKGROUND: Acceleromyography is regularly used as an isolated test to detect residual paralysis. The performance of acceleromyography, however, has not been investigated for the setting where calibration is impossible. This study first evaluated the reliability of a single acceleromyographic train-of-four (TOF) ratio (T4/T1) to detect residual paralysis and compared it with tactile estimation of fade after double-burst stimulation and 100-Hz, 5-s tetanus. The second part of the study investigated whether uncalibrated acceleromyographic TOF ratio can predict time to complete recovery. METHODS: Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol and sufentanil. In the first part of the study (n = 40) neuromuscular blockade was assessed by mechanomyography. After signal stabilization 0.15 mg/kg cisatracurium was given. At the end of surgery a first physician evaluated manual fade after double-burst stimulation, then, in the same patient, a single acceleromyographic TOF ratio was recorded; thereafter a second physician, unaware of the results, assessed fade after a 100-Hz, 5-s tetanus. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive value of the three tests to detect a mechanomyographic TOF > or =0.9 were calculated. In the second part of the study (n = 25) neuromuscular recovery was assessed simultaneously with mechanomyography and uncalibrated acceleromyography (current set manually at 60 mA); the time intervals from acceleromyographic TOF ratios of 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9 until complete recovery, i.e., adductor pollicis mechanomyography 0.9 TOF ratios, were determined. RESULTS: The sensitivity of double burst stimulation was 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13-45%), its specificity was 100%, the negative predictive value was 29% (95% CI, 13-45%), and the positive predictive value was 100%. For a single acceleromyographic TOF ratio the respective values were 70% (95% CI, 54-86%), 88% (95% CI, 67-100%), 47% (95% CI, 23-71%) and 95% (95% CI, 86-100%). The respective values for 100-Hz, 5-s tetanus were 74% (95% CI, 59-89%), 55% (95% CI, 23-88%), 38% (95% CI, 12-64%), and 85% (95% CI, 72 -99%). At an uncalibrated acceleromyographic TOF ratio was 0.6, complete recovery occurred within 16 min (95% CI, 13.5-17.8 min). At acceleromyographic TOF ratios of 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9 this time interval was 12.5 min (95% CI, 10.2-14.8 min), 8 min (95% CI, 6.1-9.9 min), and 4 min (95% CI, 2.7-5.8 min), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Acceleromyographic TOF performed better than double-burst stimulation or 100 Hz tetanus, but it did not reliably detect low degrees of residual paralysis when used as an isolated test at the end of surgery. The uncalibrated acceleromyographic TOF ratio, however, did predict the time to complete recovery.     

Recovery of neuromuscular function after cardiac surgery: pancuronium versus rocuronium

The use of pancuronium in fast-track cardiac surgical patients may be associated with delays in clinical recovery. Our objective in this study was to evaluate the incidence and severity of residual neuromuscular blockade after cardiac surgery in patients randomized to receive either pancuronium (0.08-0.1 mg/kg) or rocuronium (0.6-0.8 mg/kg). Eighty-two patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass were randomized to a pancuronium (n = 41) or rocuronium (n = 41) group. Intraoperative and postoperative management was standardized. In the intensive care unit, train-of-four (TOF) ratios were measured each hour until weaning off ventilatory support was initiated. Neuromuscular blockade was not reversed. After tracheal extubation, patients were examined for signs and symptoms of residual paresis. When weaning of ventilatory support was initiated, significant neuromuscular blockade was present in the pancuronium subjects (TOF ratio: median, 0.14; range, 0.00-1.11) compared with the rocuronium subjects (TOF ratio: median, 0.99; range, 0.87-1.21) (P < 0.05). Patients in the rocuronium group were more likely to be free of signs and symptoms of residual paresis than patients in the pancuronium group. Our findings suggest that the use of longer-acting muscle relaxants in cardiac surgical patients is associated not only with impaired neuromuscular recovery, but also with signs and symptoms of residual muscle weakness in the early postoperative period. IMPLICATIONS: The use of long-acting muscle relaxants in fast-track cardiac surgical patients is associated with significant residual neuromuscular block in the intensive care unit, including signs and symptoms of residual paresis.     

Impaired neuromuscular transmission after recovery of the train-of-four ratio

BACKGROUND: Residual neuromuscular blockade may increase the risk of development of post-operative pulmonary complications, but is difficult to detect clinically. It was speculated that patients may have impaired neuromuscular transmission after surgery of long duration, despite the recovery of the train-of-four (TOF) ratio. METHODS: The muscle force (mechanomyography), motor compound muscle action potential amplitude and fatigue of the adductor pollicis (AP) muscle were assessed after recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.9. Thirteen patients receiving repetitive administration of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) during surgery (median, 5.3 h; interquartile range, 3.4-6 h) were studied post-operatively in the intensive care unit. At the time of the measurements, patients were scheduled for extubation and the AP TOF ratio amounted to a mean (standard deviation, SD) of 0.94 (0.05). Six healthy volunteers of similar age, weight and gender were studied for comparison. Force-frequency curves were generated by stimulation (10-80 Hz) of the ulnar nerve, and the AP electromyogram (EMG) amplitude was measured, in parallel, before and after evoked muscle fatigue. RESULTS: The maximum AP force at a stimulation frequency of 20-80 Hz was significantly lower in patients than in controls [40 N (16 N) vs. 65 N (18 N) at 80 Hz]. In patients, but not in controls, the EMG amplitude decreased with increasing nerve stimulation frequency, and a tetanic fade of both force and EMG, amounting to 0.41 (0.33) (EMG) and 0.61 (0.35) (mechanomyography) at 80 Hz, was observed. Force after fatiguing contractions did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: After repetitive administration of NMBAs during surgery, even with recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.9 or more, muscle weakness from impaired neuromuscular transmission can occur. The clinician should consider that post-operative recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.9 does not exclude an impairment of neuromuscular transmission.