Comparison of subjective symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in young patients by age and gender

The authors assessed the subjective symptoms of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) in 167 young patients using self-reported forms, with five ratings for pain intensity and six ratings for difficulty in activities of daily living (ADL), to compare TMD symptoms according to gender and three age groups: group 1: 6- to 12-year-olds (juvenile); group 2: 13- to 15-year-olds (early adolescent); group 3: 16- to 18-year-olds (late adolescent). No significant gender differences were found in the symptoms among the groups, except for headache and neck pain in group 3. Pain intensity and tightness in the jaw/face, headache, and neck pain, as well as the ADL-related difficulty in prolonged jaw opening, eating soft/hard foods, and sleeping significantly differed among the groups (p < 0.01, Kruskal-Wallis test). Therefore, late adolescent patients with TMDs have higher pain intensity in the orofacial region and greater difficulty in ADL than do early adolescent and juvenile patients with TMDs.     

Comparison of patients with orofacial pain of different diagnostic categories

The authors compared the pain intensity and difficulty experienced in performing activities of daily living (ADL) among 237 patients with orofacial pain. The patients underwent comprehensive examinations and recorded their subjective symptoms on a form (five items for pain intensity and six for ADL-related difficulty). On the basis of the primary diagnosis, the patients were divided into the temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMJ), myofascial pain (MP), neuropathic pain (NP), and fibromyalgia (FM) groups. The intensity of pain in the jaw/face, tightness in the jaw/face, pain in the neck, and toothache significantly differed among the groups (p < 0.01, Kruskal-Wallis test). Compared to other patients, the FM and NP groups reported greater pain intensity, whereas those in the TMJ group reported lesser pain intensity. The ADL-related difficulty was not significantly different among the groups. Thus, compared to pain due to joint-related disorders, myalgic and neuropathic pain seem to be of higher intensity.     

Prevalence and impact of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in patients with masticatory muscle or temporomandibular joint pain: differences and similarities

AIMS: To evaluate temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients for differences between masticatory muscle (MM) and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain patients in the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and evaluate the level of psychological dysfunction and its relationship to PTSD symptoms in these patients. METHODS: This study included 445 patients. Psychological questionnaires included the Symptom Check List-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), the Multidimensional Pain Inventory, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the PTSD Check List Civilian. The total sample of patients was divided into 2 major groups: the MM group (n = 242) and the TMJ group (n = 203). Each group was divided into 3 subgroups based on the presence of a stressor and severity of PTSD symptoms. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (14.9%) in the MM group and 20 patients (9.9%) in the TMJ group presented with PTSD symptomatology (P = .112). Significant differences were found between the MM and the TMJ group in several psychometric domains, but when the presence of PTSD symptomatology was considered, significant differences were mostly maintained in the subgroups without PTSD. MM and TMJ pain patients in the "positive PTSD" subgroups scored higher on all SCL-90-R scales (P < .001) than patients in the other 2 subgroups and reached levels of distress indicative of psychological dysfunction. TMJ pain patients (58.3%; P = .008) in the positive-PTSD subgroups were more often classified as dysfunctional. Both positive-PTSD subgrounps of the MM and TMJ groups presented with more sleep disturbance (P < .005) than patients in the other 2 subgroups. CONCLUSION: A somewhat elevated prevalence rate for PTSD symptomatology was found in the MM group compared to the TMJ group. Significant levels of psychological dysfunction appeared to be linked to TMD patients with PTSD symptoms.     

Non-surgical treatment of sports-related temporomandibular joint disorders in basketball players

Abstract –  In this study, 18 basketball players (11 female, seven male; age range 14–32 years) with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) problems who had a history of sport injuries related to head or jaw region were evaluated and the results of the treatment were presented. A standardized functional examination of the masticatory system was performed including measurement of maximal jaw movements, recording of joint sounds, pain on movement of the jaw as well as tenderness to palpation of the both TMJ or masticatory muscles. Patients were also evaluated periodontally. Diagnosis was made according the criteria, described by Okeson, and appropriate treatment was applied using different kind of splints. At the end of treatment only one patient continued with right TMJ reduction with slight pain. Except for that patient, none of the patients had pain after treatment. The maximum opening of the jaws and the maximal jaw movements were statistically increased after treatment. Patients with TMJ problems also showed periodontal problems, most likely due to inadequate oral hygiene because of the limited jaw movements and pain. Periodontal parameters including probing depth (PD), Plaque index (PI), and Sulcus Bleeding Index (SBI) improved after treatment. Sports-related TMJ injuries may result in complex problems such as pain, TMJ sounds, limitation in maximal jaw movements and maximum opening of the mouth, difficulty in chewing. With the appropriate diagnosis this could be treated non-surgically in 6–8 months. This study also showed that the TMJ disorders may cause periodontal problems, which may affect all teeth and also the general health of the athlete.     

Symptoms of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthrosis and Internal Derangement 30 Years After Non-Surgical Treatment

To evaluate the long-term condition of temporomandibular joints (TMJs) affected by osteoarthrosis and internal derangement, 99 patients treated non-surgically between 1958 and 1962 were recalled for follow-up. The patients, 16 men and 83 women (mean age 58.2 years) with either reducing or permanent disk displacement, were submitted to a structured interview concerning previous treatment, masticatory function, and the presence of symptoms of osteoarthrosis and internal derangement of the masticatory system, and of complaints of the musculoskeletal system in general. A control group, consisting of eight men and 27 women (mean age 58.9 years) without complaints of the masticatory system, matching the patient group for sex, age and state of dentition, was included in the study to avoid simply documenting age-related joint conditions. Satisfaction with the treatment outcome was high. Chewing ability of the patients did not differ from that of the controls, although patients more often expected pain and difficulty with opening the mouth wide. The main TMJ symptoms of the patients had decreased significantly; patients reported joint noises more often than controls. It is concluded that, despite some persisting symptoms, the non-surgical treatment approach of TMJ osteoarthrosis and internal derangement provides long-lasting satisfactory subjective results and is well-accepted by the patients.     

Patterns of cervical and masticatory impairment in subgroups of people with temporomandibular disorders–an explorative approach based on factor analysis

Objectives: To identify clinical patterns of impairment affecting the cervical spine and masticatory systems in different subcategories of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) by an explorative data-driven approach.

Methods: For this observational study, 144 subjects were subdivided according to Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMDs into: Healthy controls, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) signs without symptoms, TMJ affected, temporomandibular muscles affected, or TMJ and muscles affected. Factor analysis and linear regression were applied to cervical spine and masticatory data to identify and characterize clinical patterns in subgroups.

Results: Factor analysis identified five clinical dimensions, which explained 59% of all variance: Mechanosensitivity, cervical movement, cervical and masticatory dysfunction, jaw movement, and upper cervical movement. Regression analysis identified different clinical dimensions in each TMD subgroup.

Conclusion: Distinct clinical patterns of cervical spine and masticatory function were found among subgroups of TMD, which has clinical implications for therapeutic management.     

Management of temporomandibular joint arthritis in children and adolescents: An introduction for orthodontists

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common inflammatory rheumatic disease of childhood. JIA can affect any joint and the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is one of the joints most frequently involved. TMJ arthritis impacts mandibular growth and development and can result in skeletal deformity (convex profile and facial asymmetry), and malocclusion. Furthermore, when TMJs are affected, patients may present with pain at joint and masticatory muscles and dysfunction with crepitus and limited jaw movement. This review aims to describe the role of orthodontists in the management of patients with JIA and TMJ involvement. This article is an overview of evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with JIA and TMJ involvement. Screening for the orofacial manifestation of JIA is important for orthodontists to identify TMJ involvement and related dentofacial deformity. The treatment protocol of JIA with TMJ involvement requires an interdisciplinary collaboration including orthopaedic/orthodontic treatment and surgical interventions for the management of growth disturbances. Orthodontists are also involved in the management of orofacial signs and symptoms; behavioural therapy, physiotherapy and occlusal splints are the suggested treatments. Patients with TMJ arthritis require specific expertise from an interdisciplinary team with members knowledgeable in JIA care. Since disorders of mandibular growth often appear during childhood, the orthodontist could be the first clinician to see the patient and can play a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of JIA patients with TMJ involvement.     

Human mastication modulated by experimental trigeminal and extra-trigeminal painful stimuli

summary This paper describes the modulation of human deliberately unilateral mastication by trigeminal and extra-trigeminal standardized painful stimuli. Series with 15 s of gum-chewing before induction of pain, during pain and after pain were quantitatively assessed by jaw-closing muscle electromyography (EMG) and kinematics of the lower jaw. Four different painful stimuli were used: cold stimulation of the frontal region, cold stimulation of the dominant hand, capsaicin stimulation of the hard palate, and pressure painm stimulation of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Intensity and quality of perceived pain were rated on visual analogue scales (VAS) and McGill's Pain Questionnaires (MPQ). Analysis of the data showed that frontal cold stimulation was the least painful test and was associated with the fewest changes in masticatory function. Cold stimulation of the hand and palatal capsaicin stimulation caused significant increases in peak amplitudes of EMG bursts from all jaw-closing muscles and faster jaw movements whereas TMJ pressure pain produced significantly lower peak EMG amplitudes. The present results suggest that nociceptive input from different tissues and even extra-trigeminal regions may modulate trigeminal motor function in selective ways. Thus, clinical observations of changes in masticatory function may not always be due to pain in the orofacial region and therefore do not necessitate orofacial treatment.     

Symptoms of the stomatognathic system in temporomandibular and cervical spine disorders

This study was performed to assess the prevalance of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in patients with cervical spine disorders (CSD) and to compare patients with CSD and subgroups of patients with TMD with regard to the results of orthopaedic tests of the stomatognathic system. A group of 103 consecutive patients with signs and symptoms of CSD and a group of 111 consecutive patients with TMD were examined. All subgroups of TMD patients showed a significantly smaller range of motion than the CSD patients. Patients with TMD had limited mouth opening (<40 mm) on active and passive mouth opening more often than CSD patients. TMD patients with myogenous problems reported oral habits more often than CSD patients, although no objective differences between CSD and TMD patients were found. Subgroups of TMD patients reported joint sounds, and pain on palpation and joint play tests of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) more frequently than CSD patients. Joint sounds on active movements, pain on palpation of the TMJ, and pain on joint play tests correctly classified 82% of the patients with TMD and 72% of the patients with CSD. In spite of the biomechanical and anatomical relationship between the neck and the stomatognathic system, the results of the study show that CSD patients have signs and symptoms of TMD comparable with those of the adult Dutch population. It was concluded that the function of the masticatory system should be evaluated in patients with neck complaints in order to rule out a possible involvement of the masticatory system.     

Correlation between cervical spine and temporomandibular disorders

Neuroanatomical interconnections and neurophysiological relationships between the orofacial area and the cervical spine have been documented earlier. The present single-blind study was aimed at screening possible correlations between clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and cervical spine disorders. Thirty-one consecutive patients with symptoms of TMD and 30 controls underwent a standardised clinical examination of the masticatory system, evaluating range of motion of the mandible, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function and pain of the TMJ and masticatory muscles. Afterwards subjects were referred for clinical examination of the cervical spine, evaluating segmental limitations, tender points upon palpation of the muscles, hyperalgesia and hypermobility. The results indicated that segmental limitations (especially at the C0–C3 levels) and tender points (especially in the m. sternocleidomastoideus and m. trapezius) are significantly more present in patients than in controls. Hyperalgesia was present only in the patient group (12–16%). Received: 18 January 1998 / Accepted: 29 April 1998     

Development of temporomandibular disorder symptoms: a 3-year cohort study of university students

The aims of this study were to examine the incidence of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) over a 3-year period and to evaluate the risk of self-reported TMDs among university students in Japan. The study population comprised 2374 university students examined at the start of their undergraduate course and 492 students re-examined after 3 years using questionnaires on symptoms of TMD and experiences of jaw injury, stress, orthodontic treatment and parafunctional habits. Cumulative incidence (%) and relative risks were calculated overall. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to determine the degree of risks of these variables for symptoms of TMDs using logistic regression. Results of logistic regression analysis showed that male subjects with experience of jaw injury had a 3·54 (CI=1·45-8·68, P<0·01)-fold higher risk of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain than that for those who did not. Female subjects who reported experiencing stress and bruxism had 10·56 (CI=1·28-87·54, P<0·05)- and 5·00 (CI=1·21-20·71, P<0·05)-fold higher risks of TMJ sound, respectively, than the risk for female subjects who had not experienced stress or bruxism. The results indicated that experiences of jaw injury, stress and bruxism were significantly associated with increased risks of development of TMJ disorders in a 3-year cohort.     

The role of parafunctions, emotions and stress in predicting facial pain

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a study to examine the degree to which parafunctions and emotional states predicted jaw pain in subjects with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and control subjects. METHODS: Ninety-six subjects diagnosed with myofascial pain, myofascial pain and arthralgia, disk displacement or no TMD symptoms participated. The authors used experience sampling methodology to collect data on pain, behaviors and emotions. They paged subjects approximately every two hours, but not during sleep. When paged, subjects completed a brief questionnaire containing rating scales of jaw pain, masticatory muscle tension, time and intensity of tooth contact, mood and stress level. RESULTS: Analyses of variance showed that groups differed significantly (P < .05) in terms of pain; masticatory muscle tension; and a composite variable measuring time and intensity of contact; mood; and stress. The two myofascial pain groups scored higher on these measures than did the group with disk displacement and the control group. The authors used masticatory muscle tension, the composite variable, mood and stress to predict jaw pain using linear regression. The model was significant and accounted for 69 percent of the variance in jaw pain. Because tension was so highly correlated with jaw pain, the authors removed this variable and re-ran the analysis. The second model also was significant and accounted for 46 percent of the variance in jaw pain. CONCLUSIONS: Parafunctional behaviors, especially those that increase muscle tension, and emotional states are good predictors of jaw pain levels in patients with TMD and healthy control subjects. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Treatment that helps patients reduce parafunctions, excess masticatory muscle tension, stress and emotional distress should be effective in reducing TMD pain.     

A unified concept of idiopathic orofacial pain: clinical features

The main features of atypical facial pain, stomatodynia, atypical odontalgia, and masticatory muscle and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders are compared in this article, which included a search of articles indexed in MEDLINE. The fact that their terminology has been the subject of many debates can be considered a consequence of taxonomic difficulties and uncertainties. Epidemiologic studies indicate marked female predominance for all types of idiopathic orofacial pain. There is also a difference in the age of maximal prevalence between masticatory muscle and TMJ disorders and the other entities. The clinical presentations display several symptoms in common. Pain is oral, perioral, or facial and does not follow a nervous pathway. It has been present for the last 4 to 6 months or has returned periodically in the same form over a period of several months or years. The pain is continuous, has no major paroxysmal character, and is present throughout all or part of the day. It is generally absent during sleep. Clinical, radiographic, or laboratory examination does not reveal any obvious organic cause of pain. There is also a frequent presence of certain psychologic factors, personality traits, or life events. Based on these shared characteristics, a unified concept is proposed. Each of these entities belongs to a group of idiopathic orofacial pain and could be expressed in either the jaws, the buccal mucosa, the teeth, the masticatory muscles, or the TMJ.     

Psychometric properties of the modified Symptom Severity Index (SSI)

Summary The psychometric properties of the modified Symptom Severity Index were investigated to assess the relationships among dimensions of pain in temporomandibular disorders (TMD). The 15‐item instrument is composed of ordinal scales assessing five pain dimensions (intensity, frequency, duration, unpleasantness and difficulty to endure) as experienced in three locations (temple, temporomandibular joint (TMJ), masseter). In 108 closed‐lock subjects, Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure internal consistency resulting in 31 of the 105 pair‐wise comparisons ≥0·71. Multilevel exploratory factor analysis was used to assess dimensionality between items. Two factors emerged, termed temple pain and jaw pain. The jaw pain factor comprised the TMJ and masseter locations, indicating that subjects did not differentiate between these two locations. With further analysis, the jaw pain factor could be separated into temporal aspects of pain (frequency, duration) and affective dimensions (intensity, unpleasantness, endurability). Temple pain could not be further reduced; this may have been influenced by concurrent orofacial pains such as headache. Internal consistency was high, with alphas ≥0·92 for scales associated with all factors. Excellent test‐retest reliability was found for repeat testing at 2–48 h in 55 subjects (Intra‐class correlation coefficients = 0·97, 95%CI 0·96–0·99). In conclusion, the modified Symptom Severity Index has excellent psychometric properties for use as an instrument to measure pain in subjects with TMD. The most important characteristic of this pain is location, while the temporal dimensions are important for jaw pain. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and assess relationships between dimensions of pain as experienced in other chronic pain disorders.     

Temporomandibular dysfunction in adult patients with myotonic dystrophy (DM1)

Myotonic muscle dystrophy is a systemic disease with early engagement of the facial muscles. Our aim was to study dysfunction of the temporomandibular system in patients with ‘classic’ dystrophia myotonica (DM1) and compare it with TMD patients and healthy controls. The study included 27 referred patients with DM1, 18 women and nine men, aged 30–62 years, and two matched control groups: patients with temporomandibular disorders symptoms (TMD) and healthy controls, both groups were consecutive patients. The patients answered questions regarding facial pain, jaw function and dysfunction. A clinical examination of the temporomandibular system including the occlusion was performed, and the maximum bite force and finger forces were measured. Among the DM1 patients, 33% reported difficulty biting off, and 22% had difficulty chewing, avoiding foods like meat and raw vegetables, and 37% of the DM1 patients scored their pain and discomfort as moderate to fairly severe. Their main complaints were TMJ clicking and locking, difficulty opening wide and tiredness. They had more clinical signs of dysfunction compared with the controls (P < 0·001), but no statistically significant difference to the TMD patients. The maximum bite force in DM1 patients was impaired compared to both the TMD patients and the controls (P < 0·001). Significantly more occlusal interferences were found in DM1 patients and were associated with chewing difficulties (P < 0·001). In conclusion, patients suffering from DM1 had an increased prevalence of TMD symptoms, reported impaired chewing function and had a decreased maximum bite force.     

颞下颌关节区疼痛患者全身伴随症状的初步研究

目的调查与颞下颌关节(TMJ)区疼痛伴随出现的全身症状的发生情况。方法选取TMJ区疼痛患者51例及TMJ区无疼痛的对照者31人,调查其TMJ症状及全身伴随症状。治疗半年后对TMJ区疼痛患者进行复查。应用一元线性回归和卡方检验对TMJ区疼痛与全身症状的相关性及伴随性进行统计学分析。结果与TMJ疼痛有相关性的症状包括头痛、背痛、手麻抖、肩颈痛、失眠、目眩、听力下降、眼痛和易疲劳(P<0.05)。患者组部分症状(头痛、肩颈痛、眼痛、耳鸣、目眩、眼下抽搐、易疲劳、手脚发凉、易烦躁、注意力不集中和消化不良)发生的比例显著高于对照组(P<0.01)。半年后与TMJ区疼痛伴随改善的症状有头痛、肩颈痛和易疲劳(P<0.05)。结论头部、肩颈等口腔颌面邻近器官的症状是TMJ区疼痛的主要伴随症状,与TMJ症状的改善有伴随关系。     

Management of painful temporomandibular disorders: Methods and overview of The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network prospective cohort study

BackgroundPatients often seek consultation with dentists for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). The objectives of this article were to describe the methods of a large prospective cohort study of painful TMD management, practitioners’ and patients’ characteristics, and practitioners’ initial treatment recommendations conducted by The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (the “network”).MethodsParticipating dentists recruited into this study treated patients seeking treatment for painful TMDs. The authors developed self-report instruments based on well-accepted instruments. The authors collected demographics, biopsychosocial characteristics, TMD symptoms, diagnoses, treatments, treatment adherence, and painful TMDs and jaw function outcomes through 6 months.ResultsParticipating dentists were predominately White (76.8%) and male (62.2%), had a mean age of 52 years, and were general practitioners (73.5%) with 23.8% having completed an orofacial pain residency. Of the 1,901 patients with painful TMDs recruited, the predominant demographics were White (84.3%) and female (83.3%). Patients’ mean age was 44 years, 88.8% self-reported good to excellent health, and 85.9% had education beyond high school. Eighty-two percent had pain or stiffness of the jaw on awakening, and 40.3% had low-intensity pain. The most frequent diagnoses were myalgia (72.4%) and headache attributed to TMDs (51.0%). Self-care instruction (89.4%), intraoral appliances (75.4%), and medications (57.6%) were recommended frequently.ConclusionsThe characteristics of this TMD cohort include those typical of US patients with painful TMDs. Network practitioners typically managed TMDs using conservative treatments.Practical ImplicationsThis study provides credible data regarding painful TMDs and TMD management provided by network practitioners across the United States. Knowledge acquired of treatment recommendations and patient reports may support future research and improve dental school curricula.     

Orofacial pain, jaw function, and temporomandibular disorders in women with a history of juvenile chronic arthritis or persistent juvenile chronic arthritis

OBJECTIVES: We sought to study the long-term outcome of juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA) in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). STUDY DESIGN: Temporomandibular disorders, including TMJ involvement, were assessed in 42 women with pauciarticular or polyarticular JCA--on average 25.8 years from disease onset--and compared with those found in matched control subjects. Disease-related parameters associated with temporomandibular disorders were identified. RESULTS: The TMJ was involved in 66.7% of the patients, most severely in extended pauciarticular JCA. Temporomandibular disorders were more frequent in the patients than in the control subjects, especially in those with persistent disease. The TMJ involvement was positively correlated with disease duration and negatively correlated with jaw opening and occlusal support. Duration of active JCA and history of functional pain were identified as predictors of present TMJ involvement. CONCLUSION: In a long-term follow-up, TMJ involvement proved frequent in the studied patients and was associated with long disease duration and previous pain on jaw opening. The findings suggest that patients with JCA should undergo orofacial evaluation on a regular basis.     

Chewing ability as a parameter for evaluating the disability of patients with temporomandibular disorders

Restoration of chewing ability is an important aspect of the treatment for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). However, too little attention has been paid to it. We have used a questionnaire to evaluate and score the chewing ability of TMD patients. The questionnaire includes 19 kinds of food and a chewing task. The patient was asked if she/he experiences difficulty in enjoying eating. The aim of this study was to evaluate correlations between score of chewing ability (SCA) and other symptoms/signs of TMD. Four hundred and seventy-three consecutive TMD patients were evaluated for SCA and other symptoms/signs including temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain, TMJ and muscle tenderness, TMJ noise (clicking and crepitus), and maximum mouth opening. The relationship between SCA and other symptoms/signs were analysed by multiple regression analysis. Score of chewing ability correlated significantly with TMJ pain and mouth opening capacity but not with TMJ noise and muscle tenderness. Age was a background factor but sex was not. The result of this study suggests that SCA correlated with dysfunction of the TMD patients. This method could be used to evaluate the ability of chewing in assessment of TMD.     

The relationship between clinical and MRI findings in patients with unilateral temporomandibular joint pain

BACKGROUND: With the advent of magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, clinicians and researchers have sophisticated techniques by which to assess the anatomy of the temporomandibular joint, or TMJ. Imaging is indicated when the results will affect the patient's care beyond that which can be gained from a complete clinical assessment. One of the primary indications for treatment of patients with temporomandibular disorders, or TMDs, is jaw pain, including TMJ pain. Therefore, it is necessary to assess whether MRI-depicted TMJ findings are associated with TMJ pain. This study assessed the relationship between TMJ pain and clinical and MRI findings. METHODS: Subjects consisted of 85 patients with unilateral jaw pain in the area of the TMJ. The contralateral, nonpainful TMJ served as the matched control. All patients underwent a complete stomatognathic examination that included palpation of both TMJs. No care was given and no anti-inflammatory medications were prescribed until bilateral MRIs were obtained within one week. RESULTS: The authors found significant relationships between the side of reported jaw pain and the patient's report that palpation of the TMJ was painful and between the side of reported pain and the presence of MRI-detected effusions. The authors found no relationship between the side of reported pain and the presence of a disk displacement, or DD, or between the presence of effusions and DD on either side of the jaw. CONCLUSION: Although MRI-depicted effusions of the TMJ were associated with reports of TMJ pain, there was a high level of false-positive and false-negative findings. The results indicate that palpation of the TMJ is more accurate than MRI-depicted effusions in identifying the TMJ as the source of pain for patients with unilateral jaw pain. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results of this study suggest that palpation of the TMJ is superior to MRI in identifying the joint as the source of pain. Therefore, the most cost-effective and valid test to determine if the TMJ is a source of jaw pain is a complete clinical assessment.