Who Should Be Screened for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis? Experience From the Western New York Stroke Screening Program

OBJECTIVE: Identification of significant asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) is important because of the stroke-risk reduction observed with carotid endarterectomy. The authors developed and validated a simple scoring system based on routinely available information to identify persons at high risk for ACAS using data collected during a community health screening program at various sites in western New York. A total of 1331 unselected volunteers without previous stroke, transient ischemic attack, or carotid artery surgery were evaluated by personal interview and duplex ultrasound. The main outcome measure was carotid artery stenosis > 60% by duplex ultrasound. In the derivation set (n = 887), 4 variables were significantly associated with ACAS > 60%: age > 65 years (odds ratio [OR] = 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.6-6.7), current smoking (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.2-3.5), coronary artery disease (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.5-3.9), and hypercholesterolemia (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.2-2.9). Three risk groups (low, intermediate, and high) were defined on the basis of total risk score assigned on the basis of the strength of association. The scheme effectively stratified the validation set (n = 444); the likelihood ratio and posttest probability for ACAS in the high-risk group were 3.0 and 35%, respectively, and in the intermediate and low-risk groups were 1.4 and 20% and 0.4 and 7%, respectively. Routinely available information can be used to identify persons in the community at high risk for ACAS. Doppler ultrasound screening in this subgroup may prove to be cost-effective and have an effect on stroke-free survival.     

Treatment of Carotid Artery Disease: Endarterectomy or Angioplasty?

The management of carotid stenosis has enjoyed renewed interest in the neurological community in recent years due to the advent of endovascular approaches. In concert, progress in medical treatment of these patients has rekindled the debate regarding the best management of carotid stenosis overall, both for symptomatic and asymptomatic disease. For symptomatic carotid stenosis, the major decision required is choosing the type of intervention best suited for individual patients: carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting. For patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis, intensive medical management has evolved significantly over the past decade to decrease the risk of ischemic stroke to match surgical intervention under most circumstances. This review will examine the supporting evidence for each intervention, and discuss the recent advances in medical and endovascular therapy that provide the data for a new era in clinical decision making.     

Stroke: Carotid stenosis--surgery or stenting to prevent stroke?

Thromboembolism resulting from complex atheromatous plaque formation at the origin of the internal carotid artery is a common cause of ischemic stroke. In appropriately selected patients, plaque removal by carotid endarterectomy is of substantial net benefit. Endovascular stenting appears less "invasive" than endarterectomy,but is the former as safe and effective as the latter?     

Carotid artery auscultation--anachronism or useful screening procedure?

Carotid bruits are supposed to indicate the presence of high-grade common carotid or extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis in a large proportion of patients. Using a stethoscope, we prospectively auscultated 273 carotid arteries of 145 patients blinded to the results of a complete extracranial and intracranial Doppler investigation including extracranial color-coded duplex ultrasound. Fifty-four arteries showed stenosis of > or = 50%-99%, or occlusion of the extracranial internal or the common carotid artery. In 25 of these arteries, a bruit was present. In 9 out of 16 patients with extracranial stenosis from 70%-99%, a bruit was detected. In one additional patient with a middle-grade external carotid artery stenosis, a bruit was also present. In seven additional patients, a bruit was present in the absence of any carotid artery stenosis, cardiac vitium or goiter. The sensitivity of carotid auscultation for the detection of a 70%-99% stenosis of the common or extracranial internal carotid artery was 56% and specificity was 91%. The positive predictive value of a bruit found during carotid auscultation was 27%, and the negative predictive value of a normal auscultation was 97%. Carotid auscultation is a useful screening procedure in the detection of carotid stenosis or occlusion, but requires confirmation by carotid ultrasound.     

Asymptomatic Alzheimer's disease: a prodrome or a state of resilience?

Neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, the neuropathological hallmarks of AD, are not limited to individuals with dementia. These pathologic changes can also be present in the brains of cognitively normal older adults - a condition we defined as Asymptomatic AD (ASYMAD). Although it remains unclear whether these individuals would remain clinically normal with longer survival, they seem to be able to compensate for or delay the appearance of dementia symptoms. Here, we provide a historical background and highlight the combined clinical, pathologic and morphometric evidence related to ASYMAD. Understanding the nature of changes during this apparently asymptomatic state may shed light on the mechanisms that forestall the progression of the disease and allow for maintenance of cognitive health, an important area of research that has been understudied relative to the identification of risks and pathways to negative health outcomes.     

Hypertension and Tachycardia During Electroconvulsive Therapy: To Treat or Not to Treat?

ECT is associated with hypertension and tachycardia for a brief period of time. In some patients, as those with severe cardiovascular disease, reduced intracranial compliance, and vascular pathology that may precipitate hemorrhage, it is reasonable to modify the cardiovascular response. Various techniques are reviewed and a method of control in use in our practice is recommended for its efficacy and safety.     

Categorical or Dimensional: How Do Attachment Measures Inform Clinicians in Couple Therapy?

Self-report measures of adult romantic attachment have been widely used in research but their application in clinical practice has not been adequately examined. One important issue is the selection of a practical and reliable attachment measure that therapists can rely on in couple therapy. In the present study, the three-category Attachment Style Prototype (Hazan & Shaver, 1987) representing the original classic conceptualization of attachment, and the Experiences in Close Relationships (Brennan, Clark, & Shaver, 1998), a more recent scale with two dimensions representing a new conceptualization, were compared. Experiences in Close Relationships data were also used to establish four clusters based on the scores of the two dimensions. The Experiences in Close Relationships and Attachment Style Prototype categories were related in meaningful ways; however, Attachment Style Prototype was less effective in detecting a group of insecurely attached individuals who tended to self-identify as securely attached. Experiences in Close Relationships clearly shows an advantage over Attachment Style Prototype in clinical application, and therefore was recommended. Examples of the clinical utilization of Experiences in Close Relationships in couple therapy were provided using Experiences in Close Relationships scores from couples seeking therapy.     

Is There Equipoise Regarding the Optimal Medical Treatment of Patients with Asymptomatic White Matter Hyperintensities?

Background: White matter hyperintensity (WMH) is a common manifestation of chronic ischemic microvascular disease that heralds greater risk of functional disability, stroke, and dementia. SPRINT MIND recently reported that intensive blood pressure reduction resulted in lower rates of mild cognitive impairment and WMH progression, suggesting that medical interventions could have a measurable impact on WMH. We conducted an anonymous survey of providers in the NINDS StrokeNet to better understand neurologist attitudes about asymptomatic WMH. Methods: We sent a 7-question survey to the 29 Regional Coordinating Centers of the StrokeNet, whose coordinators disseminated the survey to providers “involved in the care of a patient after their stroke.” Results: We received 136 responses. For stroke prevention therapies, including aspirin and statin therapy and blood pressure target, there was substantial equipoise, with no single option receiving >50% endorsement and between 15-32% of respondents choosing the option of “not sure.” 83% of respondents indicated high or moderate enthusiasm for a trial targeting this patient population. The clinical outcomes of reduction in ischemic stroke, cognitive impairment, or dementia were high importance (>70% endorsement), while the remaining radiographic, safety, and clinical endpoints all failed to reach 50% endorsement. Conclusions: Our survey establishes meaningful neurologist attitudes that can inform future WMH research. There is considerable equipoise regarding optimal medical treatment for patients with asymptomatic WMH and providers in StrokeNet, who would be a vital stakeholder in WMH research in the United States, enthusiastically support a clinical trial to resolve open questions on optimal medical management.     

Carotid artery tortuosity, kinking, coiling: stroke risk factor, marker, or curiosity?

Although abnormalities in course and geometry (tortuosity, kinking, and coiling) of the internal carotid arteries (ICA) are commonly identified, their etiology and relationship with stroke and stroke risk factors remain unclear This study assessed the clinical and ultrasonographic features of the patients with abnormalities in course and geometry of the ICA. Carotid color duplex ultrasound studies of 345 consecutive patients referred to the Neuroultrasound Lab were prospectively evaluated. Abnormalities in direction and course of the ICA were classified according to the criteria of Weibel-Fields and Metz modified by the authors. Kinking was categorized as mild (> 60 degrees), moderate (30 degrees-60 degrees), and severe (< 30 degrees). Carotid abnormalities (CA) were found in 85/345 (24.6%), 60/85 (70.6%) were female. More CA were seen in females older than 60 y/o (p < 0.001), but there was no gender difference in patients 60 y/o or younger CA were bilateral in 41 patients (48%), but in those with unilateral CA, most were on the left. The most common CA was kinking (71 arteries, 56%), followed by tortuosity (48 arteries, 38%), and coiling (7 arteries, 6%). None of the atherosclerotic vascular diseases or risk factors was associated with CA. Mild atheromatous plaques predominated in patients with CA, but moderate and large plaques were more common in the others (p = 0.001). Maximal systolic velocity at the level of CA was higher in patients with kinking or coiling compared with tortuosity (p = 0.001). Lumen diameter at the level of CA was inversely correlated to the severity of CA (p < 0.001). However, carotid stenosis was equally present in all groups. This study suggests that CA have no clear importance as a stroke risk factor or marker of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Our results suggest that CA do not develop as a consequence of vascular risk factors or atherosclerotic lesions, and they are not related to ischemic stroke, TIA or the presence of carotid stenosis. In women, CA was related with advanced age. It appears that CA frequently identified by color duplex sonography are more of curiosity than a clinically significant finding.     

Carotid angioplasty and stenting: are they therapeutic alternatives?

Clinical trials have shown that carotid surgery prevents stroke, but also has a significant risk of morbidity. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (endovascular treatment) can also be used to treat carotid stenosis and have the advantage of avoiding general anaesthesia, cranial nerve injury and the discomforts of surgery. However, there are several potential complications of endovascular treatment, including intimal dissection and plaque rupture, and the long-term consequences of restenosis. More embolic signals are detected during and immediately after carotid angioplasty than during carotid surgery, although a randomised comparison showed no difference in neuropsychological outcomes. The large published case series of carotid endovascular treatment suggest a similar major morbidity rate to surgery, but a small single centre randomised trial reported very poor results in stented patients. Trial data from the much larger Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS) has been more encouraging. Results are available from 504 patients with carotid stenosis randomised to surgery or endovascular treatment. Endovascular treatment was carried out by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty using balloon catheters with the adjunct use of stents in 22%. Audited safety analysis by intention to treat showed no difference in the outcome measure of disabling stroke or death within 30 days of treatment, but the rate of treatment related death or stroke lasting more than seven days was relatively high in both groups (endovascular treatment 10%, surgery 9.9%). Minor complications, particularly cranial nerve palsy and haematoma were significantly less frequent in the endovascular group, but restenosis was significantly more common. Both treatments appeared equally effective at preventing stroke recurrence with no difference in the rates of stroke during follow-up for up to 3 years. Techniques of carotid angioplasty and stenting improved over the course of CAVATAS, and new designs of stents, filters and protection devices are being developed. Further large, multicentre randomised trials are therefore being started which will evaluate primary stenting of carotid artery stenosis in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Until the results are available, it will remain uncertain whether angioplasty and stenting are safe and effective therapeutic alternatives to surgery.     

Carotid endarterectomy: is it still a gold standard?

Extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis accounts for 15-20% of ischemic strokes. Carotid endarterectomy has high efficacy in stroke prevention in selected patients with symptomatic (age <80 years) and asymptomatic carotid stenosis (age <75 years). Randomized clinical trials demonstrated that carotid endarterectomy reduces the stroke risk, compared to medical therapy alone, for patients with 70-99% symptomatic stenosis with 16% absolute risk reduction at 5 years. The benefit for patients with 50-69% symptomatic stenosis is lower i.e. absolute risk reduction 4.6% at 5 years. Endarterectomy is not indicated for symptomatic patients with <50% stenosis. There is no need for time-delay for surgery in patients after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. Patients with more extensive strokes or hemorrhage should undergo surgery after 4-6 weeks following initial symptoms. Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis reduces the risk of ipsilateral stroke, and any stroke, by approximately 30% over 3 years. However, the absolute risk reduction is small over the first few years and decision should be based on individual institutional experience. In all situations, the best medical therapy should accompany surgery. In the recent years, appearance of angioplasty, stenting, and distal protection procedures provides competitive alternatives to classical endarterectomy. However, long-term benefits of carotid angioplasty should be confirmed by bigger, randomized, comparative clinical trials.     

Idiopathic Carotid and Coronary Vasospasm: A New Syndrome?

We present the first case of cerebral infarction due to idiopathic reversible vasospasm of the extracranial internal carotid artery without headache or identifiable cause in a patient who subsequently suffered acute myocardial infarction due to vasospasm of the coronary artery.