A preliminary comparative study of the guided tissue regeneration and free gingival graft procedures for adjacent facial root coverage.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of guided tissue regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes to that of free gingival graft for treatment of adjacent facial gingival recession. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Eight adjacent gingival recession sites with Miller class I or II defects containing at least a maxillary or mandibular canine were selected in 6 patients. Four recession sites in 3 patients were treated with guided tissue regeneration, and the other 4 sites in the remaining 3 patients were treated with free gingival graft. Probing depth, gingival recession, attachment level, width of keratinized gingiva, and root coverage were recorded before surgery (baseline) and 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements were found for gingival recession, attachment level, and root coverage from baseline to 6 months and 1 year postoperatively in both groups. Both procedures produced the same average reduction in gingival recession, gain in attachment level, and amount of root coverage after 1 year. Probing depths did not differ between groups throughout the study. The width of keratinized gingiva was significantly greater in the grafted group than in the guided tissue regeneration group. CONCLUSION: Both procedures produced the same average amount of root coverage, reduction in gingival recession, and gain in clinical attachment. The guided tissue regeneration procedure provided a better esthetic appearance without any difference in gingival color or architecture in cases of adjacent facial gingival recession.     

Root coverage and pocket reduction as combined surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: One of the main objectives of periodontal reconstructive surgery is the coverage of exposed roots due to gingival recession. A large variety of mucogingival grafting procedures are available that give highly predictable and esthetically acceptable results when treating intact root surfaces. However, these procedures call for a second surgery site in the palate. The present study examines a series of cases in which connective tissue, obtained from the tuberosity during pocket reduction procedures in the posterior region of the maxilla, was used for root coverage. METHODS: Forty-four teeth from 25 patients with gingival recession of 3.30 +/- 0.14 mm (mean +/- SEM) were treated with subepithelial connective tissue grafts using connective tissue obtained from the tuberosity area during pocket reduction procedures in the posterior region of the maxilla. RESULTS: The mean root coverage recession after treatment was 0.16 +/- 0.06 mm, with effectiveness of coverage at 95.0% +/- 1.84 and a predictability of 84.1%. Periodontal probing depth reduction at the donor site was 4.08 +/- 0.24 mm. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the subepithelial connective tissue graft obtained from the tuberosity area during pocket reduction procedures in the posterior region of the maxilla provides a very predictable and esthetic root coverage without the need for a second surgical site.     

Expanded mesh connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions

BACKGROUND: The connective tissue graft procedure is an effective method to achieve root coverage. Although multiple sites often need grafting, the palatal mucosa supplies only a limited area of grafting material. The expanded mesh graft provides a method whereby a graft can be stretched to cover a larger area. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness and the predictability of expanded mesh connective tissue graft (e-MCTG) in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. METHODS: Fifty-two buccal gingival recessions were treated in 10 systemically healthy patients. Fifteen recession treated operation sites with at least three adjacent Miller Class I and/or II recessions were performed. The connective tissue graft obtained from the palatal mucosa was expanded to cover the recipient bed, which was 1.5 times larger than the graft. Clinical measurements recorded at baseline and 12 months postoperatively included gingival recession depth (RD), gingival recession width (RW), percentage root coverage (RC), probing depth (PD), width of keratinized tissue (KT), and clinical attachment level (CAL). RESULTS: Twelve months after surgery, a statistically significant gain in CAL (3.2 +/- 0.8 mm, P < 0.001) and increase in KT (1.2 +/- 0.4, P < 0.001) were assessed. In 80% of the treated sites, 100% RC was achieved (mean 96%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that the use of e-MCTG technique allowed the treatment of multiple adjacent recessions with adequate wound healing and highly predictable root coverage. This procedure can be applied favorably in treating multiple gingival recessions in one surgery.     

Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession.

BACKGROUND: Different techniques have been proposed for the treatment of gingival recessions. This study compared the clinical results of gingival recession treatment using a subepithelial connective tissue graft and an acellular dermal matrix allograft. METHODS: Nine patients with bilateral Miller Class I or II gingival recessions were selected. A total of 30 recessions were treated and randomly assigned to the test group and the contralateral recession to the control group. In the control group, the exposed root surfaces were treated by the placement of a connective tissue graft in combination with a coronally positioned flap; in the test group, an acellular dermal matrix allograft was used as a substitute for palatal donor tissue. Probing depth, clinical attachment level, gingival recession, and width of keratinized tissue were measured 2 weeks prior to surgery and 3 and 6 months postsurgery. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the test group and the control group in terms of recession reduction, clinical attachment gain, and reduction in probing depth. The control group had a statistically significant increased area of keratinized tissue after 3 months compared to the test group. Both procedures, however, produced an increase in keratinized tissue after 6 months, with no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: The acellular dermal matrix allograft may be a substitute for palatal donor tissue in root coverage procedures.     

A technique for augmenting the palatal connective tissue donor site: clinical case report and histologic evaluation

This case report describes a simple method for augmenting tissue at prospective palatal connective tissue donor sites. The patient was referred for treatment of facial marginal tissue recession on the maxillary left canine. Clinical examination indicated that the palatal mucosa was thin and did not provide an adequate volume of soft tissue for donor harvesting, precluding the use of a palatal connective tissue graft for treatment of the recession defect. Sterile lyophilized bovine collagen sponge was therefore surgically inserted between a full-thickness palatal flap and bone at the prospective donor site. Eight weeks postoperative, the augmented palatal donor area showed a significant clinical increase in thickness and volume and served as a connective tissue donor source in the treatment of the facial marginal tissue recession. Histologic analysis of the donor tissue demonstrated normal structure, fibrous connective tissue, and abundant collagen. Clinical examination 6 months following surgery showed complete root coverage, with tissue texture, volume, and color similar to those of the adjacent soft tissue. Healing of the donor site was uneventful. This case report demonstrates that sterile lyophilized collagen sponge material may be used to augment palatal donor connective tissue and can subsequently be used as a donor source for soft tissue grafting.     

Modeling mucosal dimensions after implantation of a bio-absorbable membrane for surgical root coverage

The aim of this study was to model alterations of mucosal thickness after implantation of a bio-absorbable membrane for surgical root coverage employing guided tissue regeneration. Periodontal conditions around 31 recession sites in 14 patients were assessed for up to 12 months after surgery. Mucosal thickness was modeled in a multivariate, three-level (occasion, tooth, subject) time series model. The amount of root coverage was studied in a bivariate multilevel model of change and mean recession to avoid mathematic coupling. Predictions of gingival thickness were, at the outset, strongly related to baseline gingival width. At maxillary teeth, gingival thickness at all measurement locations peaked 3months after surgery with negative relations to baseline gingival width. Thereafter, thickness gradually decreased but remained higher (0.3-0.5mm, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.9mm) than before surgery, while positive correlations with baseline gingival width were re-established. At mandibular teeth, gingival thickness did not change so dramatically, while thickness of lining mucosa underwent similar changes as at maxillary teeth. In contrast to previous publications, modeling change of recession depth and mean recession did not yield better results in deeper sites when applying a bivariate multilevel model that avoids mathematic coupling.     

牙龈退缩根面覆盖治疗1例

目的 牙龈退缩常常导致根面敏感、菌斑控制不良和牙龈美学等问题,影响患者的口腔健康和颜面美观。本病例采用根面覆盖术治疗牙龈退缩,以改善患者牙齿敏感问题。诊治经过：手术采用冠向复位瓣联合结缔组织移植瓣双层技术治疗退缩类型（recession type,RT）为1类的牙龈退缩。结果 术后2周,受区龈缘略水肿;术后12个月复诊,龈缘位置趋于稳定,根面覆盖率达100%,角化龈宽度及临床附着水平增加。患者无牙齿敏感、系带牵拉和瘢痕形成等不适症状,牙龈美学效果良好。结论 冠向复位瓣联合结缔组织移植瓣双层技术治疗RT 1类牙龈退缩效果良好,不仅能够获得完全根面覆盖、牙龈美学效果良好,而且增加了术区角化牙龈的宽度和临床附着水平。     

Hard and soft tissue augmentation in a postorthodontic patient: a case report

A combination of hard and soft tissue grafting is used to augment a thin biotype. A 26-year-old woman with mandibular anterior flaring and Miller Class I and III recessions requested interceptive treatment. Surgery included a full-thickness buccal flap, intramarrow penetrations, bone graft placement, and primary flap closure. Postoperative visits were at 2 and 4 weeks and 2, 3, and 6 months. Stage-two surgery consisted of submerged connective tissue graft placement. Postoperative visits were completed at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks and 1 year. Follow-up was completed 3 years after the initial surgery. Interradicular concavities were resolved and gingival biotype was augmented. Soft tissue recession remained at 6 months. Reentry revealed clinical labial plate augmentation; 2 mm was achieved at the lateral incisors and the left central incisor and 3 mm was achieved at the right canine. No bone augmentation was achieved on the left canine and right central incisor. The dehiscence at the right central incisor appeared narrower. Overall, a 2- to 3-mm gain in alveolar bone thickness/height was observed. Two months after stage-two surgery, near complete root coverage was achieved; 1 mm of recession remained on the left central incisor. There was a soft tissue thickness gain of 2 mm without any visual difference in keratinized tissue height. Interradicular concavities were eliminated; the soft tissue was augmented and the gingival biotype was altered. Interdental soft tissue craters remained. One year after connective tissue graft placement, there was near complete root coverage at the left central incisor, which at 2 months experienced residual recession. Interradicular concavities and interdental soft tissue craters were eliminated with soft tissue augmentation, including clinical reestablishment of the mucogingival junction. Clinical stability remained 3 years after the initial surgery, with the patient noting comfort during mastication and routine oral hygiene. A clinical increase in labial plate thickness, in conjunction with soft tissue augmentation, appears to provide for continued stability and decreased potential for future clinical attachment loss.     

Root coverage with cultured gingival dermal substitute composed of gingival fibroblasts and matrix: a case series

Cultured gingival dermal substitute (CGDS), composed of gingival fibroblasts and matrix and fabricated using tissue-engineering techniques, has been used for root coverage procedures. Fourteen sites from four patients with > or = 2 mm of Miller Class I or II facial gingival tissue recession were treated. The autologous CGDS sheet, prepared prior to surgical treatment, was grafted over the teeth with gingival recession and then covered with a coronally positioned flap. Vertical and horizontal recession was measured at baseline (prior to the surgical procedure) and 13 to 40 weeks (average: 30.7 +/- 9.6 weeks) after surgery. The average vertical and horizontal root coverage after surgery was 79.1% +/- 25.7% and 75.2% +/- 31.4%, respectively. Moreover, there was a significant increase of keratinized and attached gingival tissue at the final clinical evaluation compared with preoperative measurements (P < .05). These results demonstrate CGDS as a promising grafting material for use with root coverage procedures in periodontal therapy.     

Treatment of adjacent gingival recessions with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and the modified tunnel technique.

OBJECTIVE: There has been great interest in the treatment of gingival recession defects, especially with subepithelial connective tissue grafting. Recent advances have focused on subepithelial connective tissue grafting by the tunnel technique. In this clinical study, a modified periodontal plastic surgery technique for coverage of adjacent gingival recessions was performed. This surgical modification was based on the tunnel technique without vertical incisions, where the partial dissection was converted to a full-thickness dissection at the mucogingival area to supply more blood vessels. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Patients, each contributing at least two adjacent buccal gingival recessions, were treated. Subepithelial connective tissue grafting was used to cover the defects. Gingival recession, probing depth, and attachment level were measured at baseline and 8 months posttreatment. RESULTS: There were statistically significant improvements in attachment level and gingival recession after 8 months; the mean gain in attachment was 3.67 mm and the mean root coverage was 3.28 mm, which translated to mean root coverage of 95%. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that subepithelial connective tissue grafting with a modified tunnel approach, in which the partial-thickness flap is converted to a full-thickness flap in a coronoapical direction, results in adequate early healing and highly predictable root coverage in adjacent gingival recessions.     

Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes

Different techniques have been proposed for the treatment of gingival recession. This study compared the clinical results of gingival recession treatment using a subepithelial connective tissue graft and an acellular dermal matrix allograft. Seven patients with bilateral Miller class I or II gingival recession were selected. Twenty-six recessions were treated and randomly assigned to the test group. In each case the contralateral recession was assigned to the control group. In the control group, a connective tissue graft in combination with a coronally positioned flap was used; in the test group, an acellular dermal matrix allograft was used as a substitute for palatal donor tissue. Probing depth, clinical attachment level, gingival recession, and width of keratinized tissue were measured two weeks prior to surgery and at six and 12 months post-surgery. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of recession reduction, clinical attachment gain, probing pocket depth, and increase in the width of the keratinized tissue after six or 12 months. There was no statistically significant increase in the width of keratinized tissue between six and 12 months for either group. Within the limitations of this study, it can be suggested that the acellular dermal matrix allograft may be a substitute for palatal donor tissue in root coverage procedures and that the time required for additional gain in the amount of keratinized tissue may be greater for the acellular dermal matrix than for the connective tissue procedures.     

Comparison between two surgical techniques for root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix graft

Aim: The aim of this randomized, controlled, clinical study was to compare two surgical techniques with the acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG) to evaluate which technique could provide better root coverage. Material and Methods: Fifteen patients with bilateral Miller Class I gingival recession areas were selected. In each patient, one recession area was randomly assigned to the control group, while the contra‐lateral recession area was assigned to the test group. The ADMG was used in both groups. The control group was treated with a broader flap and vertical‐releasing incisions, and the test group was treated with the proposed surgical technique, without releasing incisions. The clinical parameters evaluated before the surgeries and after 12 months were: gingival recession height, probing depth, relative clinical attachment level and the width and thickness of keratinized tissue. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for all parameters at baseline. After 12 months, there was a statistically significant reduction in recession height in both groups, and there was no statistically significant difference between the techniques with regard to root coverage. Conclusions: Both surgical techniques provided significant reduction in gingival recession height after 12 months, and similar results in relation to root coverage.     

Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions Using Gingival Unit Grafts: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Background: One of the success factors in periodontal plastic surgery is the synergistic relationship between involved tissues and vascular supply. Gingiva as a functional unit is unique with a specific vascular configuration and contains the supracrestal portion naturally created to survive over avascular root surfaces. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to clinically evaluate the treatment of localized gingival recessions by using gingival unit grafts (palatal tissue involving marginal gingiva and papillae) compared with conventional palatal grafts. Methods: Seventeen patients with Class I to II recession defects on mandibular anterior teeth were included and randomly divided into two groups. Recessions were treated with gingival unit grafts in group 1 (n = 8) and with palatal grafts in group 2 (n = 9). Clinical parameters including vertical recession (VR), probing depth, keratinized tissue (KT), and attachment level were recorded at baseline and 8 months after surgery. Results: Both treatments produced significant clinical improvements within the groups. Intergroup comparison revealed significantly higher VR reduction, attachment, and KT gain in group 1 than in group 2; mean percentages of the defect coverage were 91.62% ± 9.74% and 68.97% ± 13.67%, respectively (P <0.05). Healing of the gingival unit donor site was uneventful. Conclusion: Within its limits, this study demonstrates the possibility of treating buccal recessions with gingival unit grafts as an alternative technique using gingival donor graft of site‐specific vascular configuration, with better defect coverage, clinical, and esthetic improvements compared with palatal grafts.     

Morbidity and economic complications following mucogingival surgery in a hemophiliac HIV-infected patient: a case report

BACKGROUND: This report describes the surgical treatment of a gingival recession in a hemophiliac HIV-infected patient. To our knowledge, mucogingival surgery has not been described previously in these patients. METHODS: Under the supervision of the patient's hematologist, a subepithelial connective tissue graft procedure was carried out to treat the recession. The treatment was performed after substitution therapy with factor VIII concentrate, supported by local antifibrinolytic treatment with epsilonaminocaproic acid. RESULTS: One week after surgery, the grafted zone showed a normal healing, but an area of necrosis appeared at the donor palatal site with spontaneous bleeding. The administration of factor VIII concentrate had to be prolonged to arrest the hemorrhage. In total, 44,500 units of factor VIII concentrate were used, the cost of which reached around $20,000. After 1 month the donor site had re-epithelialized by secondary intention. The root coverage was around 85% successful. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the surgical risk and the high economic cost in the use of the factor VIII concentrate, we do not recommend performing mucogingival surgery in HIV-infected hemophiliacs unless it is absolutely necessary. Prevention and early treatment must be the goal in the management of these patients.     

Efficacy of Human Chorion Membrane Allograft for Recession Coverage: A Case Series

Background : Membranes of human placentas have been used in the field of medicine for skin grafts, treatment of burns, and ulcerated skin conditions with great success. The use of placenta allografts in dentistry is a more recent development, with the first commercial product being made available in 2008. The unique inherent biologic properties in placenta allografts enhance wound healing and may propagate regeneration. Methods: Ten healthy adult patients presenting with 21 Miller Class I gingival recession (GR) defects (isolated or adjacent multiple) were surgically treated with a modified coronally advanced flap and chorion membrane for root coverage. Clinical parameters measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months were probing depth, clinical attachment level, GR height, width of keratinized gingiva, and assessment of gingival biotype. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the treatment outcomes at the follow‐up intervals. Results: The results showed statistically significant (P <0.001) improvements in all clinical parameters at the 3‐ and 6‐month follow‐ups. The mean percentage of root coverage at the end of 6 months was 89.92% ± 15.59%, and 14 of 21 treated GR defects showed 100% root coverage. The gingival biotype also showed a thick biotype in nine sites that had an initial thin biotype. Conclusions: Fetal membranes possess distinctive properties that can be harnessed to promote periodontal healing. The chorion membrane covered by a modified coronally advanced flap is a new approach that has shown promising results in terms of root coverage, increased width of keratinized tissue, and thickness of the gingival biotype.     

Localized gingival recession caused by a C-PAP mask: a case report

This case report describes a localized gingival recession on the labial of tooth # 6 caused by the nasal mask of a C-PAP (Continuous Positive Air Pressure) machine. The patient was diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Treatment consisted of night-time use of a C-PAP machine. The patient noticed sudden exposure of the root surface on no. 6 and sought evaluation by his family dentist. He was referred to a periodontist for evaluation. A subepithelial connective tissue graft was performed to repair the defect. A maxillary bite splint with a buccal and apical extension to protect the grafted area was constructed. The patient is able to wear the C-PAP mask and protective splint concurrently for successful treatment of his OSA and maintenance of the newly grafted connective tissue. We as dental practitioners can use this information to evaluate the etiology of gingival recession, especially those occurring in patients with OSA.     

Subepithelial connective tissue grafts in the treatment of multiple recession-type defects

BACKGROUND: There is little documentation regarding the treatment of multiple recession-type defects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results obtained with a connective tissue graft placed under a coronally advanced flap for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients, with at least two recession defects affecting adjacent teeth, were treated with a combination of a connective tissue graft and a coronally advanced flap. At baseline, the following measurements were recorded: 1) recession depth; 2) probing depth; 3) clinical attachment level; and 4) width of keratinized tissue. At 6 months post-surgery, all clinical measurements were repeated. RESULTS: The mean root coverage from baseline to 6 months post-surgery results was 96%. Complete root coverage was achieved in 20 (71%) of the 28 defects. The mean recession depth decreased from 3.84 +/- 1.50 mm to 0.14 +/- 0.23 mm. Statistically significant improvements were found for all clinical parameters from baseline to 6 months (P <0.01). Patients with maxillary recessions recorded statistically superior outcomes than patients with mandibular recessions. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study demonstrated that the connective tissue graft associated with a coronally advance flap is an effective procedure to cover multiple gingival recessions, especially in defects localized in the maxillary arch. However, further investigation focusing on the effects of this root coverage procedure in mandibular sites is necessary.     

Coronally positioned flap with subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: various indications and flap designs

Aesthetic concerns and functional abnormalities, such as dentin hypersensitivity, are often associated with gingival recession defects. Root coverage procedures aim to restore both gingival aesthetics and function in recession defects. The coronally positioned flap combined with the subepithelial connective tissue graft is one of the most widely used root coverage procedures. The present report illustrates four different indications where this procedure has been successfully employed. An isolated Miller class II recession defect associated with frenum pull, multiple adjacent Miller class I defects in the aesthetic zone, an isolated Miller class I defect associated with dentin hypersensitivity, and an isolated Miller class II defect on a retained deciduous tooth are the four diverse conditions treated by periodontal plastic surgery. Different approaches were used to create the coronally positioned flap. Treatment resulted in complete root coverage, resolution of hypersensitivity, and satisfaction of the patients' aesthetic concerns. An effective and predictable treatment modality, such as the coronally positioned flap combined with the subepithelial connective tissue graft, should be considered when treatment planning for gingival recession defects.     

Pocket elimination surgery with simultaneous connective tissue graft. A case report with 3-year follow-up

BACKGROUND, AIMS: The purpose of the present case report was to present 2 ways of treating recession in a periodontal patient combined with regular pocket elimination surgery. The techniques used enabled the operator to reduce the number of surgical sessions and clinically evaluate the 3-year coverage of gingival recessions using a subpedicle connective tissue graft. METHODS: Surgery consisted of pocket elimination procedures to treat adult periodontitis as a way to harvest connective tissue to be placed in the areas of recession. The grafted tissue was covered by the primary flap or left uncovered in a pouch, according to 2 different techniques described in the literature. RESULTS: In this case, we observed that, with this approach, we were successful in reducing the number of surgical session as well as achieving objective and subjective goals of therapy in treated areas.     

Root coverage with free gingival autografts--a clinical study.

AIM: To assess the percentage of root coverage with autogenous free gingival grafts. MATERIALS & METHODS: Ten non-smoking patients with Miller's class I or class II recessions were included in the study. The clinical parameters such as recession depth, recession width, probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level and width of the keratinized gingiva were recorded at the baseline, at the end of 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the surgical procedure. Autogenous free gingival grafts harvested from the palatal mucosa were used to cover the denuded roots. RESULTS: Four out of ten sites showed 100% root coverage. A mean percentage of 80.3% of root coverage was achieved.