The Emerging Imperative for Health Care Quality Improvement

There are widespread and growing concerns about the variable and too often inadequate quality of health care in the United States. As a result, health care quality is being questioned and subjected to scrutiny as never before. Awareness of the quality deficits, combined with rising health care expenditures and changing attitudes of payers and consumers, has given rise to a nascent but growing quality improvement movement. Multiple barriers must be surmounted by this movement, but substantive work is under way on all fronts. Emergency medicine will definitely be affected by the quality improvement movement and should quickly move forward to define and establish performance measures for high-quality emergency care in an era when chronic disease dominates the agenda. Emergency medicine should also aggressively work to operationalize a culture of quality to minimize medical errors, to practice evidence-based medicine, to translate research results into clinical practice in a timely manner, and to establish accountability mechanisms for quality improvement and clinical excellence.     

The role of qualitative research within an evidence-based context: can metasynthesis be the answer?

The increasing emphasis on evidence in the health care planning and policy context has fuelled considerable discussion and debate in nursing circles on the appropriate place of the less favourably placed knowledge forms within the conventional evidentiary hierarchy. In this paper, nursing's affinity for qualitative methods, and the species of knowledge they generate, are considered within the context of this evolving evidence-based practice movement. Noting conceptual and terminological confusions around the notion of evidence such as have arisen within the nursing literature, the author argues for clarity in our collective thinking about the role of research in a nursing or any other applied practice discipline. Toward this end, she points to some of the newer approaches to research synthesis and integration that may hold particular promise for enhancing our confidence about what might properly constitute a qualitatively-derived evidentiary knowledge claim. Such approaches may assist nurses to work more comfortably within the evidence-based movement, assured that reliance upon scientifically sound reference points need not compromise the complexity, richness and diversity they recognize as inherent in practice context excellence.     

Evidence based practice and its critics: what is a nurse manager to do?

o'halloran p. , porter s. & blackwood b. (2010) Journal of Nursing Management 18, 90–95
Evidence based practice and its critics: what is a nurse manager to do? Aim(s) The purpose is to discuss the arguments against the evidence based practice (EBP) movement and suggest how nursing management might respond. Background EBP is a pervasive approach to directing and regulating nursing care. There are, however, fierce critics who argue that it is fundamentally flawed and detrimental to patient care. Evaluation We consider some of the more radical criticisms of EBP, weighing the arguments and reflecting on the extent to which alleged short-comings are supported in the literature. Postmodernist critics are amongst the most vocal and are therefore our principal focus. Key issue(s) ‘Best evidence’ implies a hierarchical approach to knowledge which excludes other forms of evidence that are needed to understand the complexity of care. Evidence based guidelines tend to stifle critical thinking amongst nurses. Conclusion(s) While EBP is increasingly open to a range of research methodologies, it still largely subscribes to a hierarchy of evidence, even though this approach to addressing the complexities of healthcare is limiting. Although the EBP approach can be shown to stifle critical thinking, this is not inherent to the approach, which can lend itself to supporting professional nursing practice. Implications for nursing management Nursing managers should neither abandon EBP nor accept it uncritically.     

Getting there from here: evidentiary quandaries of the US outcomes movement

The US outcomes movement assumes, and sometimes argues, the primacy for medical practice of probabilistic knowledge derived from methodologically rigorous statistical studies. ‘Evidence-based medicine,’ then, is considered a course of clinical medicine prescribed by such research. Implementation of evidence-based medicine has recently been uneven in the US, manifesting not only the expected ‘obstacles to implementation’ but several theoretical weaknesses of the applied science model of medical care. Outcomes researchers claim to provide certainty - certainty of what probable, as it turns out - in a world of clinical uncertainty. This paper argues that outcomes research actually exacerbates the inferential uncertainty of practising physicians who would use knowledge for practice. Two quandaries are discussed: whether to privilege rigorous or relevant research, and whether to privilege universal or local knowledge. In each case, the logic of ‘evidence-based medicine’ is insuffcient to resolve the quandary and would seem to support conflicting resolutions. Recent developments in US health policy are cited as manifestations of these quandaries. Finally, the reader is asked not to disregard the political implications of the outcomes movement.     

Evidence-based practice and health visiting: the need for theoretical underpinnings for evaluation

In this paper we argue that evidence-based practice, which is being introduced throughout the British National Health Service to make decisions about the allocation of limited resources, provides a welcome opportunity for health visitors to demonstrate their efficacy, skills and professionalism. However, the paper argues that to view health visiting as evidence-based is not to reduce health visiting merely to a technology through which scientific solutions are applied to social problems. Rather, health visiting needs to be viewed as a political movement, based on a particular model of society, which shapes the goals which health visitors pursue and influences the strategies they adopt to achieve their goals. The paper describes various models of health visiting as a way of showing how the goals of health visiting are always framed within a particular set of assumptions and causal explanations. The paper then turns to look at the issue of evaluating health visiting services. It is argued that evaluation should properly take account of the models which shape health visitors' goals and intervention strategies, and in turn, health visitors need to be explicit about the theoretical frameworks underpinning their interventions. Finally, it is argued that health visitors' knowledge and understanding of a range of models of society enables them to move between the various models to choose the most appropriate and effective means of intervention. Hence it is concluded that the emphasis on evidence-based practice provides health visitors with a valuable opportunity to show that their unique, professional skills and understanding are the preconditions for effective intervention.     

From Evidence-Based Practice to Knowledge Translation: What Is the Difference? What Are the Roles of Nurse Leaders?

ObjectivesNurses, as the largest healthcare workforce, are well-positioned to apply knowledge translation. The role of nursing leadership in facilitating evidence-based practice has been extensively discussed in the literature, but this is not the case for knowledge translation. The objective of this study was to examine the potential role of nurse leaders in applying knowledge translation across health settings.Data SourcesWe reviewed the existing literature for evidence-based practice as best practice in clinical care; examined how a complex systems approach to knowledge translation may extend beyond evidence-based practice, and considered nursing leadership approaches including transformational leadership.ConclusionIn this discursive article, we discuss the differences between evidence-based practice and knowledge translation, highlight the promise of transformational leadership in facilitating knowledge translation through a complex systems lens, and argue for the importance of nurse leaders in facilitating and supporting complex knowledge translation across healthcare settings.Implications for Nursing PracticeAlthough future research is needed to test our ideas, we argue that the advanced conceptual understanding generated in this article should inform a roadmap toward a future in which nurse leaders initiate, participate and advocate for complex knowledge translation across healthcare settings.     

The role of the middle manager in the implementation of evidence-based health care

The present study reflects on the role of the middle manager in the implementation of what has become known as evidence-based health care. This movement advocates that clinical practice is continually informed by the results of robust research and evidence. In our work exploring the complexity of ensuring that practice is informed by evidence we have found that general managers have relatively little influence when compared with clinicians especially doctors. We argue that local professional groups work together in communities of practice, which are frequently uniprofessional. These boundaries affect the motivations for seeking improvement and upgrading and the way evidence and knowledge is perceived and interpreted. We argue that if the quality of health care is to be improved, we need to understand the complex historically and contextually informed interactions between different professional groups and to design diffusion strategies that acknowledge this complexity.     

Change Management in Health Care and Mental Health Nursing

Since Nightingale implied that progress was inherent in good nursing, change has slowly but surely accelerated to a frenetic pace in health care and to a degree in nursing. However, the healthy progress and implications associated with change in the nursing profession are not as readily embraced as this pace may imply. Rather, embracing change at the core of nursing and health care is a challenge as this is a group who it is suggested are not only resistant but also adept at reinforcing the status quo. Using mental health nursing as an example this position paper addresses the concept of change management, explores the facilitators and inhibitors to explain why change is not effectively managed at times. Further, case studies provided exemplify how change in mental health nursing has occurred and demonstrate how the concept of change management effectively has been achieved. Key strategies for change management are outlined in this article, noting the need to be sensitive to the culture and specifics of that organisation, because change takes place within people rather than within the organisation itself. Part of the challenges and strategies faced in the profession are related to the movement of information and knowledge from the point of research to implementation of evidence-based best practice. Leaders, therefore, should adopt change management principles and strategies, to further drive the developments which have changed mental health nursing over a relatively short period.     

Addressing domestic violence through maternal-child health home visiting: what we do and do not know

Domestic violence (DV) has been described as a public health epidemic. Health care providers of all disciplines encounter victims of DV in every practice setting. However, the vast majority of DV health care research has focused on care provided to victims in traditional acute care and clinic settings. Few investigators have conducted studies with community health nurses (CHNs) who visit DV victims in their homes. CHNs, providing preventive maternal-child health (MCH) care through home visits with families, have been described by some as key providers in DV prevention. However, there is a dearth of knowledge about the actual practice and related outcomes of these nurses when working with families experiencing DV. The purpose of this article is to provide a baseline view of the current state of knowledge on which nurses may begin building future research that leads to evidence-based practice. The article describes the potential role of home-visiting MCH nurses in DV prevention and intervention, provides a critical review of the existing research, identifies primary gaps in scientific knowledge, proposes future research priorities, and makes recommendations for practice.     

Evidence-based management: a literature review

This paper presents a review of evidence-based management (EBM), exploring whether management activities within healthcare have been, or can be, subject to the same scientific framework as clinical practice. The evidence-based approach was initially examined, noting the hierarchy of evidence ranging from randomized control trials to clinical anecdote. The literature varied in its degree of criticism of this approach; the most common concern referring to the assumed superiority of positivism. However, evidence-based practice was generally accepted as the best way forward. Stewart (1998) offered the only detailed exposition of EBM, outlining a necessary 'attitude of mind' both for EBM and for the creation of a research culture. However, the term 'clinical effectiveness' emerged as a possible replacement buzz-word for EBM (McClarey 1998). The term appears to encompass the sentiments of the evidence-based approach, but with a concomitant concern for economic factors. In this paper the author has examined the divide between those who viewed EBM as an activity for managers to make their own practice accountable and those who believed it to be a facilitative practice to help clinicians with evidence-based practice. Most papers acknowledged the limited research base for management activities within the health service and offered some explanation such as government policy constraints and lack of time. Nevertheless, the overall emphasis is that ideally there should be a management culture firmly based in evidence.     

How does "knowledge translation" affect my clinical practice?

Knowledge translation is emerging as an increasingly important area of research and practice aiming to remedy the disconnection between evidence-based clinical care and real-life practice. The discipline is informed by a large body of literature and practical tools, which can inform providers and leaders in health care. Front-line clinicians should be aware of the principles of knowledge translation and the evidence that defines successful and suboptimal strategies for introducing evidence-based care at the system level.     

Effectiveness of adolescent smoking prevention strategies

In the past 30 years, nursing knowledge of adolescent healthcare has grown tremendously, and the added knowledge can help us improve the care we provide to adolescents using evidence-based interventions for practice. While substantial progress has been made in reducing the numbers of adolescents who smoke, tobacco use by adolescents continues to be one of the largest public health problems in the United States. Current estimates are that about one in four adolescents smokes cigarettes on a regular basis. Researchers have tested community-based, school-based, and family-based interventions to prevent tobacco use among teens. This article revisits these interventions, summarizes those that have demonstrated effectiveness in preventing tobacco use among adolescents, and suggests how the interventions can be incorporated into nursing practice with teens. Recommendations for further research to establish evidence-based practice also are offered.     

Complementary Medicine and Evidence-Based Practice

Healthcare is changing as evidence-based medicine (EBM) is incorporated into education and practice. This article considers the hierarchy of evidence, the validation of evidence for decision making and the extent to which this includes aspects of cultural and social constructs of health. We review the influence and the methodology of EBM as it is applied to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), and suggest that there is an uneasy relationship as the two approaches to health have divergent understandings of health and evidence. There are fundamental philosophical and epistemological differences between orthodox and complementary medicine and we suggest that EBM is limited in how it can be applied to CAM. We question how the two approaches to healthcare can work together to create optimal outcomes in practice. The movement towards evidence-based practice underscores the division between biomedicine and CAM. Historically, there has been little scientific research into CAM, largely because of its place as a ‘fringe’ profession. Most research is funded by private sector interests who might see the economic benefit of a certain procedure or product. The research culture that has developed has been one that emphasises an evidence-based approach to establishing the efficacy of single herbs and nutrients, which overlooks the way that complementary therapists use these substances. The review concludes with a concern that the relationship between EBM and complementary medicine may become unbalanced, and the proponents of one system ignore or dismiss the values of the other. This lack of cross-paradigmatic respect is the wellspring for division and suspicion that is currently permeating the arranged marriage between CAM and EBM.     

A question of evidence: decision-making in palliative care nursing

Nurses are urged to integrate research evidence into their practice. Current perspectives of evidence-based practice promote a hierarchy of empirical evidence. Notwithstanding the contribution of empirical knowledge, this approach constrains our understanding of the value and contribution of other forms of knowledge. Shifting to a model of 'evidence informed practice', where multiple forms of knowledge are considered and valued, may better reflect the complexities of end-of-life care and offer a fuller understanding of palliative care nursing best practice.     

Central dimensions of clinical practice evaluation: efficiency, appropriateness and effectiveness - II

That a treatment selected for a given condition works, or that it works better than alternative treatments, or that it was selected because it works as well as but is cheaper than alternative treatments, should be of pivotal concern to clinicians and is of central concern to patients and to health care managers. Attempts to address these concerns have resulted in what is now widely termed the ‘effectiveness movement’. The protagonists of the movement have been concerned to create a culture of evaluation and inquiry within which the formulation of evidence-based clinical guidelines and their introduction into routine practice have played a prominent part. The need to ensure cost effectiveness of clinical intervention has been at least as emphasized as the need to ensure the clinical effectiveness of health care interventions. Although cost-effectiveness analyses are now an indispensable feature of practice guideline formulation and treatment evaluation, few studies have examined any deterioration in patient outcome associated with successful cost containment. An adequate understanding of the concept of clinical effectiveness and the associated aims of the ‘effectiveness movement’ is central to an understanding of the future nature and extent of health service provision, not simply in the UK but also internationally. Having examined the concepts of efficiency and appropriateness previously (O'Neill, Miles & Polychronis 1996, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2, 13–27) we move in this second of two articles to a detailed explanation of the concept of effectiveness, and to an examination of the derivation and use of clinical practice guidelines, concluding with a consideration of the role of practice guidelines in ensuring the cost effectiveness of health care intervention. The reservation is expressed that a ‘guidelines culture’, when established, will be manipulated by health care commissioners for largely political purposes, creating a systematic bias in the purchasing process that will actively disadvantage a range of patient groups.     

Meaning of health for Japanese elders

Since 1997, our research team has been building a research program to explore aspects of health for Japanese elders. Some of the substantive findings are: (1) highest blood pressure occurred during conversation and lowest during sleep for elders with stroke, who wore 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitors; (2) when stroke subjects talked about health, the higher use of future tense words was associated with lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure, while the higher use of past tense words was associated with higher diastolic blood pressure and; (3) when cardiac subjects talked about health, the higher use of negative feeling words was associated with higher systolic blood pressure. This substantive knowledge represents only one dimension of what we are learning. The meaning of health for Japanese elders is a collaborative research space which has enabled connecting with valued colleagues abroad to pursue understanding which informs health care research and practice in both countries.     

Evidence-based nursing: a stereotyped view of quantitative and experimental research could work against professional autonomy and authority

In recent years, there have been calls within the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS) for evidence-based health care. These resonate with long-standing calls for nursing to become a research-based profession. Evidence-based practice could enable nurses to demonstrate their unique contribution to health care outcomes, and support their seeking greater professionalization, in terms of enhanced authority and autonomy. Nursing's professionalization project, and, within this, various practices comprising the 'new nursing', whilst sometimes not delivering all that was hoped of them, have been important in developing certain conditions conducive to developing evidence-based practice, notably a critical perspective on practice and a reluctance merely to follow physicians' orders. However, nursing has often been hesitant in its adoption of quantitative and experimental research. This hesitancy, it is argued, has been influenced by the propounding by some authors within the new nursing of a stereotyped view of quantitative/experimental methods which equates them with a number of methodological and philosophical points which are deemed, by at least some of these authors, as inimical to, or problematic within, nursing research. It is argued that, not only is the logic on which the various stereotyped views are based flawed, but further, that the wider influence of these viewpoints on nurses could lead to a greater marginalization of nurses in research and evidence-based practice initiatives, thus perhaps leading to evidence-based nursing being led by other groups. In the longer term, this might result in a form of evidence-based nursing emphasizing routinization, thus--ironically--working against strategies of professional authority and autonomy embedded in the new nursing. Nursing research should instead follow the example of nurse researchers who already embrace multiple methods. While the paper describes United Kingdom experiences and debates, points raised about the importance of questioning stereotyped views of research should have international relevance.     

Governing nursing conduct: the rise of evidence-based practice

Drawing on the Foucauldian concept of 'governmentality' to analyse the evidence-based movement in nursing, we argue that it is possible to identify the governance of nursing practice and hence nurses across two distinct axes; that of the political (governance through political and economic means) and the personal (governance of the self through the cultivation of the practices required by nurses to put evidence into practice). The evaluation of nursing work through evidence-based reviews provides detailed information that may enable governments to target and instruct nurses regarding their work in the interest of preserving the health of the population as a whole. Political governance of the nursing population becomes possible through centralised discursive mechanisms, such as evidence-based reviews that present nursing practice as an intelligible field whose elements are connected in a more or less systematic manner. The identity of the evidence-based nurse requires the modern nurse to develop new skills and attitudes. Evidence-based nursing is an emerging technology of government that judges nursing research and knowledge and has the capacity to direct nursing practice at both the political and personal level.     

Teaching strategies to support evidence-based practice

Evidence-based practice is an expected core competency of all health care clinicians regardless of discipline. Use of evidence-based practice means integrating the best research with clinical expertise and patient values to achieve optimal health outcomes. Evidence-based practice requires nurses to access and appraise evidence rapidly before integrating it into clinical practice. Role modeling and integrating the skills necessary to develop evidence-based practice into clinical and nonclinical courses is an important part in developing positive attitudes toward evidence-based practice, an essential first step to using evidence to guide practice decisions. The step-by-step approach to evidence-based practice proposed by Melnyk and colleagues provides an excellent organizing framework for teaching strategies specifically designed to facilitate nurses' knowledge and skill development in evidence-based practice.     

What really worked? A case analysis and discussion of confrontational intervention for substance abuse in marginalized women

Confrontations, including ultimatums and withdrawal of services, are used by health care providers to break down denial in substance abusers. This case analysis and discussion explores the ramifications of confrontation for marginalized women and raises questions about the ethics and efficacy of this approach for substance abusers in general. Nursing is beginning to incorporate substance abuse as a substantive area of knowledge and practice. It is argued in this article that nurses should not uncritically adopt the current orthodoxy about this problem, but view it anew from our own unique, comprehensive perspective.