Concurrent chemotherapy-radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: progression-free survival analysis of a phase III randomized trial.

PURPOSE: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is highly sensitive to both radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy. This randomized phase III trial compared concurrent cisplatin-RT (CRT) with RT alone in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with Ho's N2 or N3 stage or N1 stage with nodal size > or = 4 cm were randomized to receive cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) weekly up to 8 weeks concurrently with radical RT (CRT) or RT alone. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Three hundred fifty eligible patients were randomized. Baseline patient characteristics were comparable in both arms. There were significantly more toxicities, including mucositis, myelosuppression, and weight loss in the CRT arm. There were no treatment-related deaths in the CRT arm, and one patient died during treatment in the RT-alone arm. At a median follow-up of 2.71 years, the 2-year PFS was 76% in the CRT arm and 69% in the RT-alone arm (P =.10) with a hazards ratio of 1.367 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 2.00). The treatment effect had a significant covariate interaction with tumor stage, and a subgroup analysis demonstrated a highly significant difference in favor of the CRT arm in Ho's stage T3 (P =.0075) with a hazards ratio of 2.328 (95% CI, 1.26 to 4.28). For T3 stage, the time to first distant failure was statistically significantly different in favor of the CRT arm (P =.016). CONCLUSION: Concurrent CRT is well tolerated in patients with advanced NPC in endemic areas. Although PFS was not significantly different between the concurrent CRT arm and the RT-alone arm in the overall comparison, PFS was significantly prolonged in patients with advanced tumor and node stages.     

Concomitant chemoirradiation for stage III-IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Chinese patients: results of a matched cohort analysis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of concomitant chemoirradiation (CRT) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy compared with radiotherapy (RT) alone in Chinese patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between March 1997 and September 2000, 47 Chinese patients with Stage III (n = 9, 19%) and IV (n = 38, 81%) NPC were treated with by CRT using cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 22, and 43 of RT, plus adjuvant chemotherapy using cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) for 1 day and 5-fluorouracil 1 g/m(2) for 4 days on Days 71, 99, and 127. These patients were then compared with a cohort of 47 patients treated between 1990 and 1993 with RT alone, who were matched with respect to T stage, N stage, nodal bilaterality, nodal level, and nodal size. The RT techniques were similar in the two groups but different dose and fractionation schemes were used. The median biologic equivalent dose to 2 Gy per fraction delivered to the nasopharynx was 68 Gy in the CRT group and 65.3 Gy in the RT-alone group. RESULTS: The compliance rates were 62% for concomitant chemotherapy and 40% for adjuvant chemotherapy. No treatment-related deaths occurred. At the end of treatment, 96% of the CRT group and 79% of the RT-alone group achieved a complete response (p = 0.013). With a median follow-up of 26 months, the 3-year relapse-free survival, disease-specific survival, overall survival, local relapse-free survival, nodal relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival rate for the CRT group and the RT-alone group was 62% vs. 44% (p = 0.048), 67% vs. 71% (p = 0.88), 65% vs. 69% (p = 0.93), 87% vs. 75% (p = 0.059), 95% vs. 80% (p = 0.026), and 75% vs. 70% (p = 0.84), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our experience indicates that concomitant CRT improves locoregional control in Chinese patients with locoregionally advanced NPC, but our analyses failed to detect any impact on distant failure and survival. The failure to reduce distant metastasis and improve survival may have related in part to the more advanced disease stage in our patients and the relatively low compliance rate of adjuvant chemotherapy. Our findings suggest caution should be exercised in extrapolating the findings of the Intergroup Study 0099 to Chinese patients, and confirmatory results from prospective randomized studies in the endemic population are needed.     

Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial comparing concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy with radiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in endemic regions of china

PURPOSE: A prospective randomized trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of concurrent chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in endemic regions of China. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between July 2002 and September 2005, 316 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either radiotherapy alone (RT) or chemoradiotherapy concurrent with adjuvant chemotherapy (CRT). All patients received 70 Gy in 7 weeks using standard RT portals and techniques. The CRT patients were given concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m(2) on Day 1) weekly during RT, followed by cisplatin (80 mg/m(2) on Day 1) and fluorouracil (800 mg/m(2) on Days 1-5) every 4 weeks (Weeks 5, 9, and 13) for three cycles after completion of RT. All patients were analyzed by intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: The two groups were well-balanced in all prognostic factors and RT parameters. The CRT group experienced significantly more acute toxicity (62.6% vs. 32%, p = 0.000). A total of 107 patients (68%) and 97 patients (61%) completed all cycles of concurrent chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy, with a median follow-up time of 29 months. The 2-year overall survival rate, failure-free survival rate, distant failure-free survival rate, and locoregional failure-free survival rate for the CRT and RT groups were 89.8% vs. 79.7% (p = 0.003), 84.6% vs. 72.5% (p = 0.001), 86.5% vs. 78.7% (p = 0.024), and 98.0% vs. 91.9% (p = 0.007), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrated the significant survival benefits of concurrent chemotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC in endemic regions of China.     

Combined chemoradiation vs radiation therapy alone in stage-II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis of the published literature

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment of stage-II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We searched Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Internet, China Biology Medicine, VIP, and Wanfang database for studies of the RT with or without chemotherapy in patients with stage-II NPC that were published in any language. Analyses were carried out using RevMan 5.3 software. The relative risk was used to evaluate the data, the I² test was used to compare heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis was used to evaluate the stability and reliability of the results. There were 16 studies with 3038 patients that were included in this analysis. Risk ratios (RR) of 1.04 (95% CI: 1.01-1.06), 1.05 (95% CI: 1.00-1.10), 1.05 (95% CI: 1.02-1.07), and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.97-1.03) were observed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Subgroup analysis showed that compared with conventional RT alone, chemoradiation (CRT) could significantly improve OS (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03-1.15), PFS (RR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.08-1.35), and LRFS (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04-1.14), but did not significantly improve the rate of DMFS (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.94-1.12). However, compared with intensity modulated radiation therapy alone, CRT did not significantly improve the rate of OS (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99-1.03), PFS (RR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.95-1.03), LRFS (RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.05), and DMFS (RR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.96-1.01). Compared with conventional RT alone, CRT could significantly improve patients’ prognoses in terms of OS, PFS, and LRFS for stage-II NPC, but not DMFS, and CRT can provide greater benefits from concurrent chemotherapy than neoadjuvant chemotherapy. With intensity modulated radiation therapy, the stage-II NPC patients did not benefit from the addition of chemotherapy.     

A randomised trial of radiotherapy compared with cisplatin chemo-radiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell cancer of the esophagus.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Following our phase II experience, a randomised trial was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell cancer of the esophagus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients randomised to the RT group received 50 Gy/25 fx/5 weeks of teletherapy followed 1-2 weeks later with 12 Gy/2 fx of high-dose-rate intra-lumenal brachytherapy spaced a week apart. Following the first 3 years of recruitment, due to unexpected late morbidity, brachytherapy was excluded and the protocol modified to 66 Gy/33 fx/6.5 weeks. The CRT group received identical radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin at 35 mg/m(2) for 6-7 cycles. RESULTS: Between April 1999 and December 2005, 125 patients were randomised to a RT (n=60) or CRT group (n=65). Radiotherapy treatment was completed in 78% (47/60) of the RT group and 89% (58/65) of the CRT group (P=0.10). Six or more cycles of cisplatin could be delivered in 63% (41/65), which resulted in RTOG grade 3 neutropenia of 3%. Late morbidity in the form of ulcers (5% vs. 15% odds ratio 0.29, 95% CI 0.08-1.11, P=0.08) and strictures (13% vs. 28%, odds ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.16-1.01, P=0.05) was observed in the RT and CRT groups, respectively. At a median follow up of 23 months of all patients alive (range 6-82 months) and with 95/125 events, the median, 1, 2 and 5 year projected survival was 7.1 months, 32.3%, 22.8% and 13.7% vs. 13.4 months, 57.6%, 38.9% and 24.8% for the RT and CRT groups, respectively (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.98, P=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of concurrent cisplatin to radiotherapy resulted in a modest improvement in survival and was associated with manageable additional acute and late morbidity.     

Overall survival after concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

This phase III randomized study compared concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy (CRT) versus radiotherapy (RT) alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A total of 350 patients were randomly assigned to receive external RT alone or concurrently with cisplatin at a dosage of 40 mg/m(2) weekly. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and the median follow-up was 5.5 years. The 5-year overall survival was 58.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 50.9% to 66.2%) for the RT arm and 70.3% (95% CI = 63.4% to 77.3%) for the CRT arm. In Cox regression analysis adjusted for T stage, age, and overall stage, the difference in overall survival was statistically significantly in favor of concurrent CRT (P = .049, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71 [95% CI = 0.5 to 1.0]). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that there was no difference between overall survival in the arms for T1/T2 stage (P = .74, HR = 0.93 [95% CI = 0.59 to 1.4]), whereas there was a difference between the arms for T3/T4 stage (P = .013, HR = 0.51 [95% CI = 0.3 to 0.88]), favoring the CRT arm. The regimen of weekly concurrent CRT is a promising standard treatment strategy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.     

Preliminary results of a randomized study on therapeutic gain by concurrent chemotherapy for regionally-advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: NPC-9901 Trial by the Hong Kong Nasopharyngeal Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: This randomized study compared the results achieved by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus radiotherapy (RT) alone for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with advanced nodal disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with nonkeratinizing/undifferentiated NPC staged T1-4N2-3M0 were randomized to CRT or RT. Both arms were treated with the same RT technique and dose fractionation. The CRT patients were given cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43, followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2 and fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m2/d for 96 hours starting on days 71, 99, and 127. RESULTS: From 1999 to January 2004, 348 eligible patients were randomly assigned; the median follow-up was 2.3 years. The two arms were well-balanced in all prognostic factors and RT parameters. The CRT arm achieved significantly higher failure-free survival (72% v 62% at 3-year, P = .027), mostly as a result of an improvement in locoregional control (92% v 82%, P = .005). However, distant control did not improve significantly (76% v 73%, P = .47), and the overall survival rates were almost identical (78% v 78%, P = .97). In addition, the CRT arm had significantly more acute toxicities (84% v 53%, P < .001) and late toxicities (28% v 13% at 3-year, P = .024). CONCLUSION: Preliminary results confirmed that CRT could significantly improve tumor control, particularly at locoregional sites. However, there was significant increase in the risk of toxicities and no early gain in overall survival. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the ultimate therapeutic ratio.     

Concomitant chemoradiation versus radical radiotherapy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx and nasopharynx using weekly cisplatin: a phase II randomized trial

BackgroundTo know the effectiveness and tolerance of weekly cisplatin added to radiotherapy (RT) in advanced carcinoma of oropharynx and nasopharynx.Patients and methodsStage II–IV cancer patients were randomly assigned to either radical RT, 70 Gy/35 fractions over 7 weeks (RT arm), or chemoradiotherapy (CRT), cisplatin 40 mg/m² weekly for seven doses plus RT. Primary end points were (i) the responses, (ii) toxicity profile, and (iii) overall survival (OS) in two groups. Study period was from June 2003 to July 2005.ResultsOne hundred and fifty-three patients were randomly allocated to the study, 76 in RT arm and 77 in CRT arm. Seventy-one in each arm completed the planned treatment; complete response (CR): 67.1% versus 80.5% in RT and CRT arms (P = 0.04). Grade III and IV toxicity were 16% and 40% in RT and CRT arms, respectively (P = 0.01). There were frequent treatment interruptions (9.3% versus 28.9%; P = 0.003) and hospitalization (20% versus 40.8%) in the CRT group. OS was superior in the CRT arm (P = 0.02): 27 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.2–36.8] for RT versus not reached for CRT. Three-year OS was 42% for RT and 62% for CRT group. CRT and CR were independent prognostic factors.ConclusionThis trial on Indian head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients confirms that the use of weekly cisplatin is safe and CRT is superior to RT alone resulting in higher OS.     

Conformal radiotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer: Review of 82 cases

BACKGROUND: The Intergroup 0116 study showed a survival benefit with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for resected gastric cancer. We report our experience using conformal radiotherapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty-two patients with resected gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, Stage IB to IV (M0), were treated with 45 Gy in 25 fractions using a 5-field conformal technique. Chemotherapy was in accordance with the Intergroup 0116 study, or infusional 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in a phase I/II trial. RESULTS: Mean age was 56.4 years. Median follow-up was 22.8 months. Grade 3 or greater acute toxicity (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 3.0) was noted in 57% of patients (upper gastrointestinal tract 34%, hematologic 33%). One patient died of neutropenic sepsis. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 late toxicity included esophageal strictures (3 patients) and small bowel obstruction (1 patient). Full course CRT was completed by 67% of patients. Of 26 patients who relapsed, 20 died. Site of first relapse was available on 23 patients: 8 locoregional and distant, 4 locoregional alone, 11 distant alone. Overall and relapse-free survival were 69% and 54% at 3 years. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant CRT for gastric cancer, even with conformal RT, is associated with significant toxicity. Survival was comparable to that reported in the Intergroup 0116 study.     

Efficacy and feasibility of cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and feasibility of a cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) protocol based on Intergroup Study 0099 for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: Sixteen patients with stage II-IVB NPC were treated with a protocol of cisplatin-based concurrent CRT and adjuvant chemotherapy from 1998 to 2002. Three courses of cisplatin (80 mg/m2) were scheduled during 70 Gy of radiotherapy (RT), and two agents of adjuvant chemotherapy (FP regimen: cisplatin 80 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m2/day by 4-day continuous infusion) were challenged. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up duration was 45 months. Both 3-year OS and RFS rates were 81%. Proportions of patients who tolerated each scheduled treatment were 94% for RT, 63% for concurrent chemotherapy and 38% for adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our protocol of the cisplatin-based concurrent CRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of FP regimen was effective for Japanese patients with NPC. However, the doses and numbers of cycle of chemotherapy need to be modified because of the low compliance rate. Larger numbers of data accumulation and/or multi-institutional trials may be warranted to confirm the efficacy of this protocol.     

Preliminary results of a randomized study (NPC-9902 Trial) on therapeutic gain by concurrent chemotherapy and/or accelerated fractionation for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE: To compare the benefit achieved by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and/or accelerated fractionation (AF) vs. radiotherapy (RT) alone with conventional fractionation (CF) for patients with T3-4N0-1M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients were irradiated with the same RT technique to > or =66 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction, conventional five fractions/week in the CF and CF+C (chemotherapy) arms, and accelerated six fractions/week in the AF and AF+C arms. The CF+C and AF+C patients were given the Intergroup 0099 regimen (concurrent cisplatin plus adjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil). RESULTS: Between 1999 and April 2004, 189 patients were randomly assigned; the trial was terminated early because of slow accrual. The median follow-up was 2.9 years. When compared with the CF arm, significant improvement in failure-free survival (FFS) was achieved by the AF+C arm (94% vs. 70% at 3 years, p = 0.008), but both the AF arm and the CF+C arm were insignificant (p > or = 0.38). Multivariate analyses showed that CRT was a significant factor: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.52 (0.28-0.97), AF per se was insignificant: HR = 0.68 (0.37-1.25); the interaction of CRT by AF was strongly significant (p = 0.006). Both CRT arms had significant increase in acute toxicities (p < 0.005), and the AF+C arm also incurred borderline increase in late toxicities (34% vs. 14% at 3 years, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results suggest that concurrent chemoradiotherapy with accelerated fractionation could significantly improve tumor control when compared with conventional RT alone; further confirmation of therapeutic ratio is warranted.     

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in Asian patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: toxicities and preliminary results.

PURPOSE: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is endemic in Singapore. Nearly 60% of the patients diagnosed with NPC will present with locally advanced disease. The North American Intergroup study 0099 reported improved survival outcome in patients with locally advanced NPC who received combined chemoradiotherapy when compared to radiotherapy alone. Hence we explored the feasibility and efficacy of a similar protocol in our patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between June 1996 and December 1997, 57 patients were treated with the following schedule as described. Radical radiotherapy (RT) of 66-70 Gy to the primary and neck with cisplatin (CDDP) 25 mg/m2 on days 1-4 given by infusion over 6-8 hours daily on weeks 1, 4, and 7 of the RT. This is followed by a further 3 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy starting from week 11 from the first dose of radiation (CDDP 20 mg/m2/d and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] 1 gm/m2/d on days 1-4 every 28 days). RESULTS: The majority of patients (68%) had Stage IV disease. About 54% of patients received all the intended treatment; 75% received all 3 cycles of CDDP during the RT phase and 63% received all three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. The received dose intensity of CDDP and 5-FU of greater than 0.8 was achieved in 58% and 60% of the patients respectively. Two treatment-related deaths due to reactivation of hepatitis B and neutropenic sepsis respectively, were encountered. At median follow-up of 16 months, 14 patients had relapsed, 12 systemically and 2 loco-regionally. CONCLUSION: Due to the acceptable tolerability of such a protocol in our cohort of patients, we have embarked on a Phase III study to confirm the results of the 0099 Intergroup study in the Asian context.     

诱导性同步放化疗治疗侵袭性肺上沟瘤

目的分析同步放化疗(CRT)在NSCLC外科治疗的地位.方法回顾性总结1987～1996年外科手术的30例累及胸顶部的NSCLC,单纯手术组10例,手术+放疗组(RT)9例,含铂方案化疗+放疗组(CRT)11例.结果单纯手术组2、4年生存率分别为30%和20%, RT组为22% 和11%,CRT组为73% 和53%.单因素分析根治性(是与否比较,P=0.027)和诱导性治疗(单纯手术和RT与CRT比较,P=0.0173)是有意义的预后因素.多因素分析仅诱导性治疗,P=0.023 8,是有意义的预后因素.结论与诱导性放疗和单纯手术相比,CRT可提高累及胸顶部的NSCLC患者的生存率.     

Concurrent versus sequential chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized study

PURPOSE: The superiority of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) over radiation alone in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been proven, but the relative merits of a concurrent schedule versus their sequential administration are less clear. This study compared the safety and efficacy of concurrent and sequential CRT, with chemotherapy (CT) consisting of a cisplatin and vinorelbine regimen, in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and two previously untreated patients (aged 42-75 years) with locally advanced, stage IIIA (n = 15) or stage IIIB (n = 87) NSCLC were entered into the study. The CT schedule consisted of up to four cycles of cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) at the first and fourth cycles (12.5 mg/m(2) during the 2nd/3rd cycles) on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle. Radiotherapy (RT) was prescribed at a dose of 60 Gy/30 fractions, given as five fractions per week for 6 weeks. In the concurrent arm (arm A), RT was started on day 4 of cycle 2; whilst in the sequential arm (arm B), RT started within 2 weeks after completion of CT. Fifty-two patients were randomized to concurrent treatment and 50 to the sequential schedule. RESULTS: Overall survival was significantly longer in arm A (median survival 16.6 months) versus arm B (median survival 12.9 months) (P = 0.023 by means of log-rank test; hazard ratio HR = 0.61, 95% CI of HR (0.39-0.93)), and time to progression (TTP) was also significantly longer in arm A (median time to progression 11.9 months) versus arm B (median time to progression 8.5 months) (P = 0.024 by means of log-rank test; HR = 0.62, 95% CI of HR (0.38-0.93)). Ninety-eight patients were evaluable for response and 101 for toxicity. The overall response rate was significantly higher in arm A, 80% (with 21% complete response (CR)) compared with 47% (with 17% CR) in arm B (P = 0.001 by means of chi(2)-test). WHO grade 3 or 4 toxicity was more frequent in arm A than in arm B, with a significantly greater incidence of leucopenia (53% versus 19%, P = 0.009 by means of chi(2) test) and nausea/vomiting (39% versus 15%, P = 0.044 by means of chi(2) test). There were no treatment related deaths. CONCLUSION: In this study population, concurrent CRT demonstrated significant benefit in terms of response rate, overall survival and time to progression over sequential CRT. The concurrent CRT schedule was associated with higher toxicity; however, the adverse event profile was acceptable in both arms.     

Impact of radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy on the risk for a second malignancy after breast cancer

The risk of any second malignancy was determined for all patients treated for a primary cancer of the breast without evidence of distant metastasis at Duke University Medical Center between 1970 and 1981. The incidence, 10-year actuarial risk (AR), and relative risk (RR) of a second malignancy developing were calculated for the 407 patients who were treated with surgery alone, 226 who were treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), 140 who were treated with surgery plus adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), and 308 who received all three modalities (CRT). The AR of a subsequent cancer (8.4% for CRT, 8.7% for CT, 8.7% for RT, and 11.7% for surgery only patients) did not differ significantly between treatment groups. The overall second cancer RR was 1.0% after CRT (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4 to 2.0), 1.3% after RT (95% CI, 0.6 to 2.5), 1.6% after CT (95% CI, 0.9 to 2.6), and 1.7% after surgery alone (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.4). Contralateral breast cancers (RR of 4.2%; 95% CI, 2.7 to 6.3) account for the statistically significant excess of second malignancies among the surgery alone patients. The AR for contralateral breast cancer in the surgery group was higher than in either group receiving CT (P less than 0.01), but was not significantly different from the RT group. The RR for solid tumors other than breast cancer was not significantly different from unity in any of the treatment groups. The RR for acute leukemia was 16.7% in the CRT group (95% CI, 0.2 to 92.7), 11.1% in the CT group (95% CI, 0.1 to 61.8), 10.0% in the surgery alone group (95% CI, 1.1 to 36.1), and 0.0% in the RT group (95% CI, 0.0 to 61.1). This study indicated that inclusion of RT and/or CT in the initial treatment of breast cancer did not impact negatively on patients' overall risk for a subsequent malignancy during the first decade after therapy, and that adjuvant CT with or without RT may decrease their risk of a contralateral breast cancer.     

The Scottish and Manchester randomised trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced cervical cancer

204 eligible patients were entered into a multicentre randomised trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess whether there was any survival advantage in patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with those given radiotherapy alone. Patients were aged up to 70 years, performance status 0-1/2, with bulky stage IIb, stage III or stage IVa squamous or adenosquamous carcinoma. Three cycles of methotrexate 100 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 were given at 2-weekly intervals before radical radiotherapy. 104 eligible patients received the combination treatment and 100 radiotherapy only. The two arms of the study were well balanced for tumour and patient characteristics. The response rate to chemotherapy was 49%, 33% of patients in the radiotherapy (XRT) alone arm and 45% of the combination arm were clinically free of tumour at the end of treatment. The median follow-up for surviving patients is 5.4 years (range: 11 months-8 years) and 84% have been followed-up for more than 4 years. 134 patients have died (68 XRT only, 66 combined arm). The median survival RT alone was 111 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI) 72-151 weeks), combination arm 125 weeks (95% CI 79-170 weeks). The estimated death ratio is 0.79 (P = 0.19, 95% CI 0.56-1.12). The estimated 3-year survival is 40% (95% CI 30-50%) RT only compared with 47% (95% CI 37-57%) in the combination arm. Acute and late toxicity of radiotherapy was not increased by the addition of chemotherapy.     

Plasma Epstein–Barr viral DNA load at midpoint of radiotherapy course predicts outcome in advanced-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BackgroundTo test the hypothesis that prognostication of treatment outcome is feasible by biomarker response at midcourse of chemoradiotherapy (CRT)/radiotherapy (RT), with respect to the plasma load of Epstein–Barr viral (EBV) DNA in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Patients and methodsOne hundred seven patients with stage IIB–IV NPC were prospectively studied. Plasma EBV DNA load was measured by quantitative PCR before therapy (pre-DNA), at completion of 4 weeks of CRT/RT (mid-DNA), and within 3 months of completion of therapy (post-DNA). The end points are post-DNA load, a recognized surrogate of survival, and clinical outcome.ResultsNinety-three percent of patients had detectable EBV DNA before therapy (median load = 972 copies/ml). EBV DNA became undetectable in 55 (51%) patients at the end of week 4 of therapy. Detectable mid-DNA was associated with worse clinical outcome (median follow-up time, 6.2 years), for distant failure [hazard ratio (HR) 12.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.78–51.93; P < 0.0001], progression-free survival (PFS; HR 4.05, 95% CI 1.89–8.67, P < 0.0001), and overall survival (OS; HR 3.29, 95% CI 1.37–7.90, P = 0.0077). Seventy-four percent of all failures were associated with detectable mid-DNA, whereas 34% of all failures were associated with detectable post-DNA. Stratification by tumor stage (IIB, III, IV) has no significant prognostic effect.ConclusionsUnfavorable EBV DNA response at midcourse of RT/CRT is an adverse prognosticator for treatment outcome, is linked to majority of all failures, and discriminates outcome better than tumor stage. The data could provide a basis for trial design that addresses alteration of therapy intensity during the latter phase of CRT, and adjuvant therapy. Validation studies are awaited.     

Chemotherapy with gemcitabine-containing regimens for locally recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Results from Phase II trials conducted in Asia have shown that gemcitabine alone (GEM) or with cisplatin (GC) is active among patients with metastatic or locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: At the Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH), Toronto, 32 patients with NPC were treated with GEM (n = 18) or GC (n = 14) from January 2000 to October 2001. Patients either received 1000 mg/m(2) GEM on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days as a single agent, or with cisplatin (CG) given on day 2 at 70 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Most patients (91%) were of Southeast Asian ancestry and 29 (91%) had Type 2 (World Health Organization 1991 classification) nonkeratinizing histology. Sixteen of the GEM (89%) and five (36%) of the GC patients had received chemotherapy before entering the study. Median follow-up was 32 weeks (range, 2-97 weeks) for both groups. In the GEM group, there were five (28%) partial responses (PR) and one (6%) complete response (CR), giving an overall response rate of 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.59). In the GC group, there were two (14%) CRs and seven PRs (50%), giving an overall response of 64% (95% CI, 35-87). Hematologic toxicity was dose limiting but uncomplicated. Nonhematologic toxicity included one patient with reversible reactivation of hepatitis, one with Grade 3 cisplatin-related sensory neuropathy, and three with cardiovascular events that were possibly related to chemotherapy. The median duration of response for the GEM and GC patients was 17 and 24 weeks and the 1-year survival rate was 48% (95% CI, 18-78) and 69% (95% CI, 40-99), respectively. Median survival has not been reached. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that GEM is an active and tolerable drug for patients with NPC.     

Concurrent weekly carboplatin and radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: report of a joint phase II study.

We report a phase I/II study of weekly concurrent carboplatin and radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (M0 stage). Of 47 patients registered, 45 completed the treatment course. Twenty-six (55%) (95% CI, 41-69%) patients experienced > or =grade 3 acute toxicity (RTOG). Five (11%) (95% CI, 2-20%) patients experienced > or =grade 3 chronic toxicity. This regimen appears to have acceptable toxicity compared to the experimental arm of Phase III Intergroup Study 0099, but progression-free and overall survival are probably inferior. At present, there is no data to suggest that carboplatin can replace cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiation for NPC.     

Second malignancy risk associated with treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma: meta-analysis of the randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Despite several investigations, second malignancy risks (SMR) following radiotherapy alone (RT), chemotherapy alone (CT) and combined chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) remain controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We sought individual patient data from randomised trials comparing RT versus CRT, CT versus CRT, RT versus CT or involved-field (IF) versus extended-field (EF) RT for untreated HL. Overall SMR (including effects of salvage treatment) were compared using Peto's method. RESULTS: Data for between 53% and 69% of patients were obtained for the four comparisons. (i) RT versus CRT (15 trials, 3343 patients): SMR were lower with CRT than with RT as initial treatment (odds ratio (OR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.62-0.98 and P = 0.03). (ii) CT versus CRT (16 trials, 2861 patients): SMR were marginally higher with CRT than with CT as initial treatment (OR = 1.38, CI 1.00-1.89 and P = 0.05). (iii) IF-RT versus EF-RT (19 trials, 3221 patients): no significant difference in SMR (P = 0.28) although more breast cancers occurred with EF-RT (P = 0.04 and OR = 3.25). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of CT in addition to RT as initial therapy for HL decreases overall SMR by reducing relapse and need for salvage therapy. Administration of RT additional to CT marginally increases overall SMR in advanced stages. Breast cancer risk (but not SMR in general) was substantially higher after EF-RT. Caution is needed in applying these findings to current therapies.