Oral health behaviors of preschool children with cerebral palsy: a case‐control community‐based study

To describe and compare the oral health behaviors of preschool children with and without cerebral palsy (CP), and to assess the oral health knowledge and attitudes of their primary caregivers (PCGs). Seventy‐two preschool children with CP were recruited from 23 Special Child Care Centers in Hong Kong. An age‐ (±3 months) and gender‐matched sample of children from mainstream preschools was recruited as a “control group.” Assessment of children's oral health behaviors and the PCGs' oral health knowledge and attitudes was conducted using questionnaires. Preschool children with CP were less likely to have ever attended a dentist (p < 0.05). Tooth brushing frequency was similar between the two groups (p > 0.05), but PCGs of children with CP more frequently reported provision of tooth brushing assistance to their children (p < 0.001). PCGs in both groups had similar oral health knowledge and attitudes (p > 0.05). Difference in oral health behaviors existed between preschool children with and without CP. PCGs of children with and without CP had similar oral health knowledge and attitudes.     

Gagging Problem Assessment: a re‐evaluation

The Gagging Problem Assessment (GPA) is an instrument to evaluate dental gagging. Although the GPA seemed to be reliable and valid in a pilot study, a replication study with more subjects was needed. Based on the pilot study, the number of items was reduced, resulting in the revised version of the GPA (GPA‐R). The aims of this study were to replicate the reliability of the GPA‐R and to investigate the correlation between dental gagging and general anxiety. Dental gagging patients (n = 59) were compared with a control group (n = 17) at t0 and 3 weeks later. The ‘gagging group’ also filled in the SCL‐90 anxiety scale. Gagging‐specific homogenous domains and internal consistency were determined. Stability and distinguishing capacity of the GPA‐R were assessed. SCL‐90‐Anxiety scores were compared with standard values in a non‐clinical population. The GPA‐R patient part was able to reliably discriminate between the absence or the presence of dental gagging. However, the reliability of the GPA‐R‐dentist part was insufficient. The GPA‐R seems to be sensitive to subtle differences in acts of the dentists. To overcome these problems, more detailed and explicit instructions on how to use the GPA‐R should be formulated and more specific gagging stimuli should be included. The ‘gagging group’ reported ‘fear of choking’ significantly more often than the control group (P = 0·008). This finding might be important for the treatment of dental gagging. Considering the outcome of our study, development of a new diagnostic gagging tool needs another approach that focuses on gagging severity.     

Oral health attitudes and behaviours of final‐year dental students

Objectives: The objectives of this study of final‐year dental students in 10 classes (1997, 2001—2009) were to examine their self‐reported oral health attitudes and behaviours and describe any trends in these attributes. Participants and methods: Students were surveyed in final semester via an anonymous questionnaire (34 behaviour questions; eight attitude statements). Distributions, trends over time and attitude–behaviour associations were examined. Results: Of 583 students, 459 responded (79%). All tooth‐brushed with fluoride toothpaste; 80% brushed ≥2/day. Overall, 85% flossed; over time flossing behaviour increased significantly (P < 0.05), and those flossing 1—2/day increased (P < 0.005). Over time, significant decreases occurred in those taught toothbrushing (P < 0.001) and flossing (P < 0.05), and in use of mouth rinses (P < 0.05) and tooth cleansing sticks/picks (P < 0.001). Almost all (96%) had received a dental examination; 77% attended a dentist 1—3/year. Between‐meal snacking was common (84%); 71% chewed gum. Although 18% had ever smoked, 5% currently smoked. Most strongly agreed they expected to keep most of their teeth for all their life (76%); their future needs for fillings would be minimal (61%); smoking could adversely affect their teeth or gums (85%); and regular dental attendance was important for their dental health (51%). Congruent attitudes and behaviours favouring oral health were widely held concerning dental attendance, flossing and smoking. Conclusions: Final‐year dental students showed well established, favourable oral hygiene attitudes and behaviours, with evidence to suggest this knowledge was developed whilst in dental school. Despite many ceasing smoking, 5% still smoked. All dental students should receive training in motivational counselling and tobacco cessation to ensure this is included in patient care.     

Self‐reported dry mouth among ageing people: a longitudinal,cross‐national study

Focusing on Swedish and Norwegian cohorts of community‐dwelling older adults between age 65 and 70, this study aimed to identify predictors of the prevalence and incident cases of daytime and night‐time xerostomia. It was hypothesized that the prevalence increases with increasing age and is higher in women than in men and that the prevalence of persistent xerostomia and the 5‐yr‐incident cases are higher in people with consistent use of medication and need for health care. Of the Norwegian participants who completed the 2007 survey (age 65 yr), 70% (n = 2,947) participated in 2012. Individuals participating in both 2007 and 2012 constituted the Swedish panel (80%, n = 4,862). The prevalence of xerostomia was higher in women than in men and increased from age 65 to age 70, most markedly in the Swedish cohort. The risk of persistent xerostomia was greatest for participants with consistent use of medication (OR = 1.3) and contact with a physician (OR = 2.3). The risk of incident cases of xerostomia during daytime was greatest for participants with recent and consistent use of medication and recent contact with a physician. Dental professionals should identify patients with xerostomia, emphasize early prevention, and alleviate oral symptoms in collaboration with physicians.     

Oral health care needs and oral health‐related quality of life (OHIP‐14) in homeless people

Daly B, Newton T, Batchelor P, Jones K. Oral health care needs and oral health‐related quality of life (OHIP‐14) in homeless people. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2010. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S Abstract – Objectives: The aim of this study was (i) to determine the oral health status and oral health care needs of this population, (ii) to assess oral health‐related quality of life using OHIP‐14 and (iii) to explore whether there is a relationship between oral health status and oral health‐related quality of life. Methods: A convenience sample was drawn from eight facilities catering for homeless people in south east London. Participants were invited to attend an outreach dental clinic and receive a clinical oral health and treatment needs assessment. The impact of oral disease was assessed using OHIP‐14. Results: There were 102 people from a range of vulnerable housing situations invited to participate in the study. The mean age was 39.5 (SD ± 12.3) and 92% (n = 92) were men. The mean DMFT of dentate participants (n = 94) was 15.5 (SD ± 7.6), mean DT was 4.2 (SD ± 5.2), mean MT was 6.8 (SD ± 6.0) and mean FT was 4.6 (SD ± 4.8). Normative needs were extensive with 76% having a restorative need, 80% having a need for oral hygiene measures and periodontal treatment and 38% having a prosthetic treatment need. Ninety one per cent of homeless people experienced at least one impact and the mean number of impacts (n = 90) was 5.9 (SD ± 4.8).The most commonly experienced oral health‐related quality of life impacts were in the dimension of pain, with aching in the mouth having a prevalence of 65% and discomfort while eating foods having a prevalence of 62%. Forty‐four per cent felt handicapped by their oral condition. The experience of oral impact had only a slight relationship with clinical status and there were no differences in clinical status or oral impact by vulnerability of housing situation. Conclusions: Oral health care needs were extensive and greater than that of the general population in the UK, although disease levels were similar. While homeless people experienced many more oral impacts (as measured with OHIP‐14) compared with adults of the same age in the general population in the UK, there was only a slight relationship with clinical status and oral health‐related quality of life.     

Methods and preliminary findings of a cost‐effectiveness study of glass‐ionomer‐based and composite resin sealant materials after 2 yr

The cost‐effectiveness of glass‐carbomer, conventional high‐viscosity glass‐ionomer cement (HVGIC) [without or with heat (light‐emitting diode (LED) thermocuring) application], and composite resin sealants were compared after 2 yr in function. Estimated net costs per sealant were obtained from data on personnel time (measured with activity sampling), transportation, materials, instruments and equipment, and restoration costs for replacing failed sealants from a community trial involving 7‐ to 9‐yr‐old Chinese children. Cost data were standardized to reflect the placement of 1,000 sealants per group. Outcomes were the differences in the number of dentine caries lesions that developed between groups. The average sealant application time ranged from 5.40 min (for composite resin) to 8.09 min (for LED thermocured HVGIC), and the average cost per sealant for 1,000 performed per group (simulation sample) ranged from $US3.73 (for composite resin) to $US7.50 (for glass‐carbomer). The incremental cost‐effectiveness of LED thermocured HVGIC to prevent one additional caries lesion per 1,000 sealants performed was $US1,106 compared with composite resin. Sensitivity analyses showed that differences in the cost of materials across groups had minimal impact on the overall cost. Cost and effectiveness data enhance policymakers’ ability to address issues of availability, access, and compliance associated with poor oral‐health outcomes, particularly when large numbers of children are excluded from care, in economies where oral health services are still developing.     

A comparative study of oral health knowledge,attitude and behaviour of non‐medical,para‐medical and medical students in Udaipur city,Rajasthan, India

To cite this article:
Int J Dent Hygiene
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601‐5037.2009.00393.x
Sharda AJ, Shetty S. A comparative study of oral health knowledge, attitude and behaviour of non‐medical, para‐medical and medical students in Udaipur city, Rajasthan, India. Abstract: Aim: The aim of the study was to assess and compare the Oral health knowledge, attitude and behaviour of the non‐medical, para‐medical and medical students. Material and methods: In a cross‐sectional study, a total of 825 students (males – 577, females – 248) of six different professions belonging to non‐medical, para‐medical and medical categories were surveyed using a self‐administered, structured questionnaire pretested through a pilot survey. The mean percentage scores, standard deviation and frequency distribution were calculated. The Student’s t‐test, anova test, Scheffe’s test and chi‐squared test were used as test of significance. The linear regression analysis was used to assess the relation of behaviour with knowledge and attitude. Results: The knowledge scores were significantly higher for the medical students compared with those of non‐medical students. The attitude scores were significantly lower for the non‐medical category compared with the other two categories and the scores were the highest among the para‐medical students. The behaviour scores were significantly lower for the non‐medical students than for the para‐medical and the medical categories. All the scores were significantly higher for females than for the males. Regression analysis showed a linear relationship of behaviour with the attitude, but no significant linear relation with the knowledge. Conclusion: All the students showed low level of knowledge and the preventive behaviour among the students could still be improved. The results indicate that the knowledge was not enough to influence the oral health behaviour, but behaviour showed linear relationship with attitude of the students.