Prevalence and phenotypic distribution of dyslipidemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus: effect of glycemic control

BACKGROUND: Data on the prevalence of dyslipidemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus are scarce and are based on total triglyceride and total cholesterol concentrations alone. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of glycemic optimization on the prevalence of dyslipidemia and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations requiring intervention in patients with type 1 diabetes. PATIENTS: A total of 334 adults with type 1 diabetes and 803 nondiabetic control subjects. METHODS: Levels of glycosylated hemoglobin, total cholesterol, total triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and LDL-C were assessed at baseline and after 3 to 6 months of intensive therapy with multiple insulin doses. RESULTS: Levels of LDL-C greater than 4.13 mmol/L (>160 mg/dL) and total triglyceride greater than 2.25 mmol/L (>200 mg/dL) and low HDL-C levels (<0.9 mmol/L [<35 mg/dL] in men or <1.1 mmol/L [<45 mg/dL] in women) were found in 16%, 5%, and 20% of patients and 13%, 6%, and 9% of controls, respectively (P<.001 for HDL-C). Diabetic women showed more hypercholesterolemia than nondiabetic women (15.6% vs 8.5%; P =.04). After glycemic optimization (mean +/- SD glycosylated hemoglobin decrease, 2.2 +/- 1.96 percentage points), the prevalence of LDL-C levels greater than 4.13 mmol/L (>160 mg/dL) became lower in diabetic men than in nondiabetic men (9.7% vs 17.5%; P =.04), but women showed frequencies of dyslipidemia similar to their nondiabetic counterparts. The proportion of patients with LDL-C concentrations requiring lifestyle (>2.6 mmol/L [>100 mg/dL]) or drug (>3.4 mmol/L [>130 mg/dL]) intervention decreased from 78% and 42% to 66% and 26%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Low HDL-C is the most frequent dyslipidemic disorder in patients with poorly controlled insulin-treated type 1 diabetes, and a high proportion show LDL-C levels requiring intervention. Less favorable lipid profiles could explain the absence of sex protection in diabetic women. The improvement caused by glycemic optimization puts forward intensive therapy as the initial treatment of choice for dyslipidemia in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes.     

Unlike type 2 diabetes,type 1 does not interact with the codon 54 polymorphism of the fatty acid binding protein 2 gene

In type 2 diabetes, the threonine (Thr) for alanine (Ala) codon 54 polymorphism of the fatty acid binding protein 2 gene is associated with elevated fasting and postprandial triglycerides and dyslipidemia when compared with the wild type (Ala-54/Ala-54). To assess whether this is the case in patients with type 1 diabetes, who usually do not manifest the metabolic syndrome, we screened 181 patients with similar glycemic control as the type 2 patients. Thirty percent were heterozygous, and 9% were homozygous for the polymorphism. Mean (+/-SEM) fasting plasma triglyceride levels in patients with the wild type (n = 84), those heterozygous for Ala-54/Thr-54 (n = 44), and those homozygous for the Thr-54 (n = 13) were 1.0 +/- 0.07, 1.1 +/- 0.17, and 1.2 +/- 0.23 mmol/liter, respectively. In addition, there were no differences in total, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol among the three groups. After a fat load, the postprandial area under the curve of triglyceride in plasma, chylomicrons, and very low-density lipoprotein were similar between the wild type (n = 18) and the Thr-54 homozygotes (n = 12). In conclusion, in contrast to type 2, type 1 diabetes does not interact with the codon 54 polymorphism of the fatty acid binding protein 2 gene to cause hypertriglyceridemia/dyslipidemia. Insulin resistance could account possibly for this difference.     

Effect of improving glycemic control on low-density lipoprotein particle size in type 2 diabetes

The current study sought to assess the effect of improving glycemic control in type 2 diabetes on the components of diabetic dyslipidemia, especially low-density lipoprotein (LDL) size. A total of 33 type 2 diabetic patients (48.5% women, age 59.6 +/- 11.1 years, body mass index [BMI] 28.9 +/- 4.9, diabetes duration 6 [0 to 40] years, 40.7% on insulin) were seen at the hospital because of poor glycemic control (hemoglobin A(1c) [HbA(1c)] 10.33% +/- 1.89%). Triglyceride, LDL-cholesterol (LDLc, Friedewald/ ultracentrifugation), high-density lipoprotein HDL-cholesterol (HDLc, direct method), apolipoproteins AI (apoAI) and B (apoB) (immunoturbidimetry), and LDL size (gradient gel electrophoresis) were measured at baseline and after improvement in glycemic control (decrease >/= 1 percentage point in HbA(1c) and final HbA(1c) 相似文献   

Efficacy of berberine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Berberine has been shown to regulate glucose and lipid metabolism in vitro and in vivo. This pilot study was to determine the efficacy and safety of berberine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. In study A, 36 adults with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomly assigned to treatment with berberine or metformin (0.5 g 3 times a day) in a 3-month trial. The hypoglycemic effect of berberine was similar to that of metformin. Significant decreases in hemoglobin A1c (from 9.5%+/-0.5% to 7.5%+/-0.4%, P<.01), fasting blood glucose (from 10.6+/-0.9 mmol/L to 6.9+/-0.5 mmol/L, P<.01), postprandial blood glucose (from 19.8+/-1.7 to 11.1+/-0.9 mmol/L, P<.01), and plasma triglycerides (from 1.13+/-0.13 to 0.89+/-0.03 mmol/L, P<.05) were observed in the berberine group. In study B, 48 adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus were treated supplemented with berberine in a 3-month trial. Berberine acted by lowering fasting blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose from 1 week to the end of the trial. Hemoglobin A1c decreased from 8.1%+/-0.2% to 7.3%+/-0.3% (P<.001). Fasting plasma insulin and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index were reduced by 28.1% and 44.7% (P<.001), respectively. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were decreased significantly as well. During the trial, 20 (34.5%) patients experienced transient gastrointestinal adverse effects. Functional liver or kidney damages were not observed for all patients. In conclusion, this pilot study indicates that berberine is a potent oral hypoglycemic agent with beneficial effects on lipid metabolism.     

Influence of simvastatin on LDL-subtypes in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and in patients with diabetes mellitus and mixed hyperlipoproteinemia.

This study evaluates the influence of simvastatin on lipid concentrations and on LDL-subtype distribution in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and in patients with type 2 diabetes and mixed hyperlipoproteinemia. Nine patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (LDL-cholesterol: 7.1 +/- 1.1 mmol/L, triglycerides: 1.3 +/- 0.4 mmol/L) and 8 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mixed hyperlipoproteinemia (HbA1c 6.8 +/- 1.1%, LDL-cholesterol: 4.8 +/- 0.7 mmol/L, triglycerides: 2.5 +/- 1.1 mmol/L) were examined. Cholesterol concentration was determined in 7 LDL-subfractions isolated by density gradient ultracentrifugation before and during simvastatin treatment (10-20 mg/d, 4 weeks). Simvastatin decreased LDL-cholesterol (-34%/-30%, all p < 0.05) and triglycerides (-2%, n.s./-25%, p < 0.05), but had little effect on HDL-cholesterol (+7%/+2%, n.s.) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and diabetes mellitus, respectively. In both groups a significant reduction of cholesterol in each LDL-subfraction was observed. Large-buoyant (LDL-1, LDL-2) and intermediate-dense (LDL-3, LDL-4) LDL were reduced more than small-dense (LDL-5-LDL-7) LDL-subtypes (-36%/-38%/-23%, respectively) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, while in diabetic patients cholesterol reduction was uniform in all LDL-subtypes (-29%/-27%/-31%, respectively). Simvastatin decreases cholesterol concentration in all LDL-subfractions in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and in patients with diabetes mellitus with mixed hyperlipoproteinemia. However, the relative reduction of individual LDL-subtypes differed between both groups. This suggests that the effect of simvastatin on LDL-subtype distribution depends on the type of underlying hyperlipoproteinemia.     

Combined metformin-sulfonylurea treatment of patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes in fair to poor glycemic control.

The effect of metformin treatment was studied in 13 patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), whose fasting plasma glucose concentration was greater than 10 mmol/L with maximal sulfonylurea doses. Patients were studied before and 3 months after receiving 2.5 g/day metformin. The fasting plasma glucose concentration (12.4 +/- 0.8 vs. 8.8 +/- 0.7 mmol/L), mean hourly postprandial plasma glucose concentration from 0800-1600 h (14.0 +/- 1 vs. 9.4 +/- 0.9 mmol/L), and glycosylated hemoglobin level (12.3 +/- 0.6% vs. 9.0 +/- 0.6%) were all significantly (P less than 0.005-0.001) lower after the administration of metformin. The improvement in glycemic control was associated with a 24% increase (P less than 0.05) in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake during glucose clamp studies and a 16% decrease in basal hepatic glucose production (P less than 0.05). Mean hourly concentrations of plasma insulin (411 +/- 73 vs. 364 +/- 73 pmol/L) and FFA concentrations (440 +/- 31 vs. 390 +/- 40 mumol/L) were also lower after 3 months of metformin treatment. However, neither insulin binding nor insulin internalization by isolated monocytes changed in response to metformin. Finally, plasma triglyceride, very low density lipoprotein triglyceride, and very low density lipoprotein cholesterol were significantly decreased (P less than 0.01-0.001), and high density lipoprotein cholesterol was significantly increased (P less than 0.001) after metformin treatment. Thus, the addition of metformin to sulfonylurea-treated patients with NIDDM not in good glycemic control significantly lowered fasting and postprandial plasma glucose concentrations, presumably due to the combination of enhanced glucose uptake and decreased hepatic glucose production. Since the dyslipidemia present in these patients also improved, the results suggest that metformin may be of significant clinical utility in patients with NIDDM not well controlled with sulfonylurea compounds.     

Lipid-lowering effect of simvastatin in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Dyslipidemia is an important factor in causation of macrovascular disease in type 2 diabetics. The role of simvastatin in the management of dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is not very well elucidated, particularly in the context of the recent American Diabetes Association criteria 2001. The American Diabetes Association suggests that aggressive therapy of diabetic dyslipidemia will reduce the risk of coronary heart disease in diabetics and that optimal levels are serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <2.60 mmol/L (< 100 mg/dl), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol >1.1 5 mmol/L (>45 mg/dl) and triglycerides <2.30 mmol/L, (<200 mg/dl).This study was planned to compare the effect of simvastatin together with behavioral modification and behavioral modification alone, in age, sex and body mass index matched patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with dyslipidemia, in reaching the target levels of various lipids as suggested by the American Diabetes Association criteria 2001. METHODS AND RESULTS: An open-label, prospective study was conducted on 80 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, who had fair to moderate glycemic control with a total glycated hemoglobin < 10%. The patients in the control group (n=40) were treated with only behavioral modifications like calorie control and daily walking for 30 minutes, and no lipid-lowering agent was given. The lipid profile was re-evaluated after 6 and 12 weeks. The patients in the test group (n=40) were advised behavioral modification and given simvastatin. The starting dose was 10 mg at bed time. After 6 weeks of simvastatin therapy, a lipid profile was done. If the goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 100 mg/dl and/or triglycerides <200 mg/dl and/or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol >45 mg/dl was not achieved, the dose of simvastatin was increased to 20 mg at bedtime for another 6 weeks. It was observed that low-density lipoprotein dyslipidemia was most prevalent. In the control group, a favorable alteration in lipid levels was brought about but none was statistically significant and the American Diabetes Association goals were not achieved in any of the patients. In the test group, there was a significant and favorable alteration in all lipid moieties, and the target levels were achieved in 80% of patients after 12 weeks. There was no significant alteration in glycemic control and liver functions. Myopathy and epigastric pain were seen in 1 patient in each group. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, behavioral modification alone did not achieve the target levels of various lipids in diabetic dyslipidemia as per the American Diabetes Association guidelines. Hence, pharmacological therapy with statins should be resorted to in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who carry a high risk of coronary heart disease. Simvastatin is a safe and efficacious lipid-lowering drug.     

Atorvastatin improves diabetic dyslipidemia and increases lipoprotein lipase activity in vivo

A major factor contributing to cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes is dyslipidemia, characterized by low HDL cholesterol and high triglycerides, rather than elevated LDL cholesterol. Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is the rate-limiting enzyme of triglyceride removal from plasma and has been implicated in atherosclerosis. Since treatment with statins significantly reduces cardiovascular morbidity in diabetes, we analyzed the lipid profile and LPL activities in 61 patients with type 2 diabetes before and 8 weeks after initiation of atorvastatin (40 mg) or placebo treatment. Lipid parameters and LPL activity were unchanged under treatment with placebo. Atorvastatin treatment resulted in a 30% reduction of total and a 45% reduction of LDL cholesterol (6.06 +/- 1.39 mmol/L versus 4.14 +/- 1.27 mmol/L and 4.11 +/- 1.13 mmol/L versus 2.27 +/- 0.89 mmol/L, both P < 0.0001). Triglycerides and VLDL cholesterol were also significantly reduced by statin therapy (2.24 +/- 2.11 mmol/L versus 1.82 +/- 1.46 mmol/L and 1.08 +/- 1.56 mmol/L versus 0.67 +/- 0.66 mmol/L, both P < 0.05). HDL cholesterol was not different between the atorvastatin and the placebo group. Compared to baseline, LPL activity was increased by 25% after atorvastatin treatment (213.0 +/- 28.1 nmol/mL/min versus 171.9 +/- 17.7 nmol/mL/min, P < 0.01). Our data demonstrate that atorvastatin induces a significant improvement of diabetic dyslipidemia and a significant increase of LPL activity. Since low LPL activity indicates an increased cardiovascular risk, the statin-mediated increase in LPL activity may help to explain the reduction of CAD in diabetic patients treated with statins.     

国产比索洛尔对高血压2型糖尿病患者糖代谢的影响

目的观察国产比索洛尔对高血压合并2型糖尿病患者糖代谢及血压的影响情况。方法将符合纳入标准的高血压合并2型糖尿病患者随机分组。观察治疗前后患者糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹血糖、糖耐量和血压等的变化。结果共有92例患者完成研究,其中比索洛尔组47例,卡托普利组45例。治疗前和经12周治疗后两组HbA1c、空腹血糖、餐后2h血糖、收缩压和舒张压差异均无统计学意义(P=0.05)。结论本研究表明比索洛尔作为高选择性β1受体阻滞剂,对于原发性高血压合并2型糖尿病患者糖代谢无明显不良影响,同时具有良好的降压效果。     

Treatment of hyperlipidemia in primary practise in Germany: sub-group analyses from the 4E-registry with particular emphasis on men and women with diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: To investigate the achievement of treatment goals for low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in men and women with diabetes mellitus receiving statins in a primary-care setting in Germany. METHODS: 6,827 men and 5,989 women with diabetes mellitus were recruited from among the 28,200 men and 24,200 women participating in the 4E registry of patients being treated with statins for primary hypercholesterolemia unresponsive to diet and lifestyle. Participants were assessed after 6 weeks and 9 months of statin therapy. Attainment of treatment targets was assessed (i) using individual LDL goals based on each participant's individual level of risk and (ii) based on the 2.6 mmol/L target recommended by current European and U.S. guidelines for persons with diabetes. RESULTS: At baseline, patients with and without diabetes mellitus had similar LDL cholesterol levels patients (men: 4.5+/-1 vs. 4.7+/-1 mmol/L, women: 4.7+/-1 vs. 4.9+/-1 mmol/L respectively). The mean drop in LDL cholesterol on statin therapy was similar in men and women with and without diabetes, ranging from 26-27 percent all subgroups. After 9 months of statins, individual LDL goals were achieved by 25% of men and 24% of women with diabetes, while only 16% of diabetic men and 12% of diabetic women achieved the 2.6 mmol/L LDL target. These success rates were similar to those of non-diabetics, including those at high risk, in 4E. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes mellitus in 4E responded just as well to statins as patients without diabetes. However, achievement of treatment goals in patients with diabetes was just as poor as in other high-risk groups in the 4E cohort.     

2型糖尿病高危人群的血管内皮功能与血浆游离脂肪酸水平

目的研究2型糖尿病（T2DM）患者、糖耐量正常的2型糖尿病一级亲属（FDRs）、糖耐量减低（IGT）人群的血管内皮功能、血浆游离脂肪酸（FFA）水平并与健康对照组进行比较。方法测定36例健康人（男16例,女20例）、57例FDRs（男27例,女30例）、59例IGT（男25例,女34例）,35例T2DM（男15例,女20例）的FFA水平、内皮依赖性血管舒张功能（EDV）以及空腹胰岛素、TC、TG、BMI、腰臀围比、空腹血糖及糖化血红蛋白,同时计算胰岛素敏感性指数（IAI）。结果FDRs、IGT及T2DM组的EDV显著低于健康对照组[FDRs组（5．03±0．34）％,IGT组（3．09±0．28）％,T2DM组（2．62±0．29）％,对照组（12．45±3．37）％];FFA水平高于对照组[FDRs组（0．52±0．08）mmol／L,IGT组（0．52±0．12）mmol／L,T2DM组（0．59±0．23）mmol／L,对照组（0．46±0．18）mmol／L];IAI低于对照组（FDRs组-4．20±0．38,IGT组-4．41±0．72,T2DM组-4．65±0．64,对照组-3．79±0．57）,差异均有统计学意义（P值均〈0．05）。结论T2DM、糖耐量正常的FDRs及IGT人群存在IAI降低、血管内皮功能受损、FFA升高。     

Current status of diabetes management in elderly Koreans with diabetes

Knowledge about the current status of diabetes management is indispensable for the improvement of diabetes management. We performed a survey to investigate the current trend of diabetes management in elderly Koreans, at eight hospitals located throughout the country. A total of 539 patients with type 2 diabetes older than 65 years (men=224, women=315) were recruited. Their mean age was 71.5+/-4.9 years and BMI 24.3+/-3.4 (men=23.6+/-2.8, women=24.9+/-3.7)kg/m(2), and 38.2% of the patients were obese (BMI> or =25 kg/m(2), men=29.5%, women=44.4%). The mean duration of the diabetes was 13.1+/-9.2 years. Although 37.3% of the patients had A1C below 7.0%, 33.8% of the patients had A1C more than 8.0%. Three hundred and sixty three patients (67.4%) were treated with oral hypoglycemic agents and 175 patients (32.5%) were treated with insulin or combination with oral agents. The glycemic control was better in patients treated with oral agents (oral agent group=7.7+/-4.6%, insulin group=8.5+/-1.9%). Although mean SBP and DBP were 131.4+/-16.7 and 75.9+/-10.4 mmHg, respectively, 67.4% of the patients had hypertension and 38.2% of the patients with hypertension did not reach the goal (<130/80 mmHg). Of 539 elderly patients, 253 patients (47.4%) had dyslipidemia (LDL-C> or =4.1 mmol/l and/or triglyceride> or =2.5 mmol/l and/or HDL-C<1.1 mmol/l) and 72.7% of the patients with dyslipidemia took the lipid lowering agents. However, 47.4% of them did not achieve the goal (LDL-C<2.6 mmol/l and/or triglyceride<1.7 mmol/l and/or HDL-C>1.1 mmol/l). Twenty-eight patients (5.5%) had been admitted to the hospital because of severe hypoglycemia. Half of the patients (57%) had microvascular complications (retinopathy, neuropathy or overt proteinuria), and 28% of the patients had macro-vascular complications (CVD, stroke or peripheral vascular disease). As elderly diabetic patients are usually polymorbid, diabetes mellitus in old age is needed a more comprehensive approach to not only the treatment of hyperglycemia but also of hypertension, dyslipidemia and other associated diseases.     

A randomized trial of improved weight loss with a prepared meal plan in overweight and obese patients: impact on cardiovascular risk reduction

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term effects of a prepackaged, nutritionally complete, prepared meal plan compared with a usual-care diet (UCD) on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese persons. DESIGN: In this randomized multicenter study, 302 persons with hypertension and dyslipidemia (n = 183) or with type 2 diabetes mellitus (n = 119) were randomized to the nutrient-fortified prepared meal plan (approximately 22% energy from fat, 58% from carbohydrate, and 20% from protein) or to a macronutrient-equivalent UCD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was weight change. Secondary measures were changes in blood pressure or plasma lipid, lipoprotein, glucose, or glycosylated hemoglobin levels; quality of life; nutrient intake; and dietary compliance. RESULTS: After 1 year, weight change in the hypertension/dyslipidemia group was -5.8+/-6.8 kg with the prepared meal plan vs -1.7+/-6.5 kg with the UCD plan (P<.001); for the type 2 diabetes mellitus group, the change was -3.0+/-5.4 kg with the prepared meal plan vs -1.0+/-3.8 kg with the UCD plan (P<.001) (data given as mean +/- SD). In both groups, both interventions improved blood pressure, total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, glycosylated hemoglobin level, and quality of life (P<.02); in the diabetic group, the glucose level was reduced (P<.001). Compared with those in the UCD group, participants with hypertension/dyslipidemia in the prepared meal plan group showed greater improvements in total (P<.01) and high-density lipoprotein (P<.03) cholesterol levels, systolic blood pressure (P<.03), and glucose level (P<.03); in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus, there were greater improvements in glucose (P =.046) and glycosylated hemoglobin (P<.02) levels. The prepared meal plan group also showed greater improvements in quality of life (P<.05) and compliance (P<.001) than the UCD group. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term dietary interventions induced significant weight loss and improved cardiovascular risk in high-risk patients. The prepared meal plan simultaneously provided the simplicity and nutrient composition necessary to maintain long-term compliance and to reduce cardiovascular risk.     

Impaired free fatty acid suppression during hyperinsulinemia is a characteristic finding in familial combined hyperlipidemia, but insulin resistance is observed only in hypertriglyceridemic patients

Insulin resistance has been associated with hypertriglyceridemia, combined hyperlipidemia, and familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL). Whether all FCHL patients with different types of dyslipidemia have low insulin sensitivity has not been evaluated. We measured insulin sensitivity by the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp with indirect calorimetry in 110 healthy controls and in 105 nondiabetic, FCHL family members: in 50 without dyslipidemia, in 19 with hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol >/=7.7 mmol/L), in 22 with hypertriglyceridemia (total triglycerides >/=2.4 mmol/L in men 2.4 mmol/L in women), and in 14 with combined hyperlipidemia. During the hyperinsulinemic clamp, FCHL family members had higher free fatty acid levels than did controls (0.06+/-0.06 [mean+/-SD] in controls versus 0.16+/-0.11 in relatives without dyslipidemia versus 0.15+/-0. 07 in hypercholesterolemic patients versus 0.29+/-0.14 in hypertriglyceridemic patients versus 0.27+/-0.17 mmol/L in patients with combined hyperlipidemia; P<0.001 after adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index). Relatives without dyslipidemia (16.4+/-4.4 micromol. kg(-1). min(-1), P=0.001) and patients with hypertriglyceridemia (12.8+/-3.8 micromol. kg(-1). min(-1), P<0.001) and with combined hyperlipidemia (13.7+/-3.1 micromol. kg(-1). min(-1), P<0.001) had lower rates of insulin-stimulated glucose oxidation than did controls (19.4+/-4.7 micromol. kg(-1). min(-1)). Also, the rates of nonoxidative glucose disposal were lower in patients with hypertriglyceridemia (P=0.001) and combined hyperlipidemia (P=0.011) than in controls. In contrast, subjects with hypercholesterolemia and control subjects had similar rates of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. We conclude that a defect in free fatty acid suppression during hyperinsulinemia, probably located in adipose tissue, is characteristic for all FCHL patients with varying types of dyslipidemia, whereas insulin resistance in skeletal muscle is observed only in FCHL patients with elevated triglyceride levels.     

Fasting and daylong triglycerides in obesity with and without type 2 diabetes

Postprandial hypertriglyceridemia associated with insulin resistance is one of the cardiovascular risk factors in obesity and type 2 diabetes. It is not known whether diabetics have a more pronounced postprandial hypertriglyceridemia than obese subjects. Daylong triglyceridemia, representing postprandial lipemia, was determined in obese subjects with and without type 2 diabetes and in lean subjects. Nineteen type 2 diabetics (F/M: 7/12, body mass index [BMI]: 30.6 +/- 5.4 kg/m(2)), 45 obese nondiabetics (F/M: 16/29, BMI: 29.5 +/- 2.6 kg/m(2)) and 78 lean subjects (F/M: 28/50, BMI: 23.7 +/- 2.2 kg/m(2)) measured capillary triglycerides (TGc) during 3 days on 6 fixed time-points each day in an out-of-hospital situation. Daylong TGc profiles were calculated as mean integrated area under the TGc-curve (TGc-AUC). Fasting plasma TG were higher in diabetics and obese nondiabetics (1.81 +/- 0.79 and 1.77 +/- 0.80 mmol/L) compared with lean subjects (1.23 +/- 0.67 mmol/L, P <.001). TGc-AUC was similarly increased in both diabetics and obese nondiabetics (35.0 +/- 12.1 and 35.2 +/- 10.6 mmol.1 h/L) compared with lean controls (25.5 +/- 12.0 mmol.1 h/L, P <.001). Self-reported energy intake was not significantly different between the groups. Fasting TGc (r =.87, P <.001) and waist circumference (r =.51, P <.001) were the parameters best associated with TGc-AUC. Using stepwise multiple regression analysis, fasting TGc, BMI, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were the best predictors of TGc-AUC, explaining 77% of the variation. The cut-off level for "normal" TGc-AUC, calculated as the 75th percentile of TGc-AUC in lean subjects, was 30.7 mmol.1 h/L and corresponded with a fasting TGc of 1.8 mmol/L (eg, 1.6 mmol/L in plasma), calculated using univariate regression analysis. In conclusion, daylong triglyceridemia is similarly increased in diabetics and obese nondiabetics compared with lean subjects. Fasting TG and central obesity largely determine daylong triglyceridemia, independent of the presence of type 2 diabetes. Decreasing fasting plasma TG below 1.6 mmol/L could lead to a normalization of postprandial lipemia in obese subjects with and without diabetes.     

A longitudinal study of gastric emptying and upper gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with diabetes mellitus

PURPOSE: To evaluate the natural history of gastric emptying and upper gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with diabetes mellitus. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 20 patients (6 men, 14 women) with diabetes mellitus (16 with type 1 diabetes, 4 with type 2 diabetes). Each had measurements of gastric emptying of a solid (100 g of ground beef) and liquid (150 mL of 10% dextrose) meal using scintigraphy, glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)] and mean blood glucose levels), upper gastrointestinal symptoms, and autonomic nerve function at baseline and after a mean (+/- SD) of 12.3 +/- 3.1 years of follow-up. RESULTS: There were no differences in mean gastric emptying of the solid component (retention at 100 minutes at baseline: 56% +/- 19% vs. follow-up: 51% +/- 21%, P = 0.23) or the liquid component (time for 50% to empty at baseline: 33 +/- 11 minutes vs. follow-up: 31 +/- 12 minutes, P = 0.71) during follow-up. Mean blood glucose (17.0 +/- 5.6 mmol/L vs. 13.8 +/- 4.9 mmol/L, P = 0.007) and HbA(1c) (8.4% +/- 2.3% vs. 7.6% +/- 1.3%, P = 0.03) levels were lower at follow-up. There was no difference in symptom score (baseline: 3.9 +/- 2.7 vs. follow-up: 4.2 +/- 4.0, P = 0.78). There was evidence of autonomic neuropathy in 7 patients (35%) at baseline and 16 (80%) at follow-up. CONCLUSION: In patients with diabetes mellitus, we did not observe any marked changes in either gastric emptying or upper gastrointestinal symptoms during a 12-year period.     

Cardiovascular risk factors associated with diabetes in an Indian community of Guadeloupe. A case control study

Indians of Guadeloupe have an especially high prevalence type 2 diabetes mellitus and a particular susceptibility to coronary heart disease. This case-control study conducted from September 15 to 24, 1997, analysed cardiovascular risk factors associated with diabetes and particularly dyslipidaemia in the Indian community of Guadeloupe. The 172 subjects included 86 diabetic patients of Indian origin and 86 age- and sex-matched non-diabetic controls. All subjects underwent a physical examination by the same observer. Obesity and hypertension were assessed, and fasting lipid concentrations were measured. The body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio were higher among patients than controls: 27.8 vs 25.1 Kg/m2 (p < 0.001) and 0.94 vs 0.90 (p < 0.001). Mean arterial systolic and diastolic pressures were higher for patients than controls (p < 0.001). Median HDL-cholesterol was 1.23 mmol/L for patients vs 1.4 mmol/L for controls (p < 0.001), and median triglycerides were 2.0 vs 1.3 mmol/L (p < 0.001). Mean apolipoprotein B was 1.40 +/- 0.36 g/L for patients vs 1.23 +/- 0.35 g/L for controls (p < 0.001). Our results show slight hypertension, central obesity, a lower plasma HDL-cholesterol concentration, a higher triglyceride concentration, and a higher apolipoprotein B concentration for diabetics. These data would appear to have important implications for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in this population.     

Effects of omega-3 fish oils on lipid metabolism, glycemic control, and blood pressure in type II diabetic patients

We investigated the effects of omega-3 fish oil (FO) supplementation on lipid metabolism, glycemic control, and blood pressure (BP) in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. In 22 diabetic patients without overt hyperlipidemia, serum triglyceride, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, HDL2-cholesterol, HDL3-cholesterol, and apolipoprotein A-I (apo A-I) levels did not change during omega-3 FO supplementation for 8 weeks. The mean serum apo B concentration increased significantly [baseline, 2.56 +/- 0.11 (+/- SEM) mmol/L; 4 weeks, 2.82 +/- 0.13 mmol/L; 8 weeks, 2.80 +/- 0.13 mmol/L; P less than 0.01]. The mean plasma postheparin lipoprotein lipase activity increased transiently during the fourth week (baseline, 168 +/- 17 U/mL; 4 weeks, 182 +/- 18 U/mL; P less than 0.05), whereas postheparin hepatic triglyceride lipase activity did not change. Glycemic control worsened transiently during the fourth week, (baseline, 7.7 +/- 0.4%; 4 weeks, 8.4 +/- 0.3%; P less than 0.05). Both systolic and diastolic BP decreased significantly throughout the study (systolic BP: baseline, 142 +/- 5 mm Hg; 8 weeks, 128 +/- 5 mm Hg; diastolic BP: baseline, 88 +/- 4 mm Hg; 8 weeks, 80 +/- 3 mm Hg; P less than 0.01). These findings suggest that in type II diabetics without overt hyperlipidemia, omega-3 FO supplementation does not improve either the glycemic control or serum lipids, and it is associated with a potentially detrimental rise in serum apo B concentrations. Until more information is available, use of such supplementation should be discouraged.     

Time course of C-reactive protein reduction with simvastatin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The aim of this study was to investigate the time course of C-reactive protein (CRP) reduction with simvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Thirty-five subjects (mean +/- SEM body mass index 32.8 +/- 1 kg/m(2), mean +/- SEM glycated hemoglobin 7.3 +/- 0.2%) were studied using a randomized, crossover, double-blind design. Patients were treated with simvastatin 40 mg or placebo for 28 days, with a minimum 28-day intervening washout. On entry, all subjects had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >100 mg/dl and/or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol >130 mg/dl. High-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) was measured on days 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 of each phase; fasting lipids were measured weekly. The mean hs-CRP level was 4.2 +/- 0.6 mg/L at baseline (>3.0 mg/L represents high risk). After simvastatin administration, there was a significant reduction in levels of log(hs-CRP) (p = 0.001). This effect of simvastatin was seen by day 7 (p = 0.008), with maximal reduction seen at day 14 (p = 0.004; hs-CRP in original units 3.1 +/- 0.5 mg/L with simvastatin and 4.1 +/- 0.6 mg/L with placebo). As expected, the change in hs-CRP was not related to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction. By day 28 with simvastatin, hs-CRP had returned to near baseline levels. In conclusion, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, simvastatin reduced hs-CRP within 7 days. However, this potentially beneficial effect was lost within 28 days.     

C-peptide and glucagon profiles in minority children with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The present study was conducted to determine the extent of insulin deficiency and glucagon excess in the hyperglycemia of type 2 diabetes in children. The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents has increased substantially over the past several years. Because insulin and glucagon action both regulate blood glucose concentration, we studied their responses to mixed meals in children with type 2 diabetes. Subjects were 24 patients with type 2 diabetes compared with 24 controls, aged 9--20 yr (predominantly African-Americans), matched for body mass index and sexual maturation. All of those with diabetes were negative for antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase. Plasma glucose, glucagon, and serum C-peptide concentrations were measured at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after a mixed liquid meal (Sustacal) ingestion (7 mL/kg body weight; maximum, 360 mL). The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated by trapezoidal estimation. The incremental C-peptide (Delta CP) in response to the mixed meal was calculated (peak -- fasting C-peptide). The plasma glucose AUC was significantly greater in patients than in controls (mean +/- SEM, 1231 +/- 138 vs. 591 +/- 13 mmol/L x min; P < 0.001). The Delta CP was significantly lower in those with diabetes than in controls (1168 +/- 162 vs. 1814 +/- 222 pmol/L; P < 0.02). Glucagon responses did not differ between the two groups. Hyperglycemia is known to inhibit glucagon secretion. Therefore, our patients with substantial hyperglycemia would be expected to have decreased glucagon responses compared with controls and are thus relatively hyperglucagonemic. Patients were divided into poorly and well controlled subgroups (glycosylated hemoglobin A(1c), > or =7.2% and <7.2%, respectively). There were no significant differences in the Delta CP and glucagon responses between these two subgroups. We next analyzed the data in terms of duration of diabetes (long term, > or =1 yr; short term, <1 yr). The CP was significantly lower in long- vs. short-term patients (768 +/- 232 vs. 1407 +/- 199 pmol/L; P < 0.05). The plasma glucagon AUC was significantly higher in the long- vs. short-term patients (9029 +/- 976 vs. 6074 +/- 291 ng/L x min; P < 0.001). Hemoglobin A(1c) did not differ between long- vs. short-term patients. Our results indicate that relative hypoinsulinemia and hyperglucagonemia represent the pancreatic beta- and alpha-cell dysfunctions in children with type 2 diabetes. The severity of both beta- and alpha-cell dysfunctions appears to be determined by the duration of diabetes.