Delayed-onset peripheral blood cytopenia after rituximab: frequency and risk factor assessment in a consecutive series of 77 treatments

The occurrence of unexplained peripheral blood cytopenia, particularly neutropenia, has been recently reported after rituximab. Its prevalence may be underestimated since it may occur late after treatment. This study analysed all cases of unexplained delayed-onset peripheral blood cytopenia of WHO grade II - IV occurring in an unselected series of patients treated with rituximab in order to evaluate its prevalence and clinical significance. Seventy-seven courses of rituximab (corresponding to 317 rituximab infusions) given to 72 consecutive patients affected by non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and treated at a single Center with rituximab, alone (nine cases), associated with chemotherapy (50) or with chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (18) were evaluated. Twenty-three cases of cytopenia (29.8%) were observed. Neutropenia developed in 21 cases (27.3%), thrombocytopenia in eight (10.4%), anemia in four (5.2%). Multiple cytopenias were observed in nine cases. Neutropenia developed after a median of 10 weeks, anemia of 5 weeks and thrombocytopenia of 4 weeks after the last rituximab dose. Severe infections occurred in four of 21 neutropenic patients (19%), compared to two of 56 controls (3.6%) (p = 0.043). Cytopenia eventually resolved in nine of 18 evaluable cases after a median of 10 weeks (range 1 - 23). Age, sex, histology, bone marrow infiltration, hypogammaglobulinemia, previous chemotherapy, autologous stem cell transplant, rituximab schedule and timing, rituximab doses were analysed as predictors for cytopenia; by multivariate analysis only a previous treatment with chemotherapy and more than four rituximab doses were significantly associated with a higher risk of post-rituximab delayed cytopenia. Delayed-onset cytopenia, particularly neutropenia, is a clinically significant complication of rituximab treatment, which merits further investigation.     

Rituximab in combination with fludarabine chemotherapy in low-grade or follicular lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of fludarabine plus rituximab in treatment-naive or relapsed patients with low-grade and/or follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, single-arm, single-center phase II study enrolling 40 patients. During the first week of the study, patients received two infusions of rituximab 375 mg/m2 administered 4 days apart. Seventy-two hours after the second infusion of rituximab, patients received the first of six cycles of fludarabine chemotherapy (25 mg/m2/d for 5 days on a 28-day cycle). Single infusions of rituximab were administered 72 hours before the second, fourth, and sixth cycles of fludarabine, and two infusions of rituximab were given 4 weeks after the last cycle of fludarabine. Treatment duration was 26 weeks. RESULTS: An overall response rate of 90% (80% complete response rate) was achieved in the intent-to-treat population. Similar response rates were seen in treatment-naive and previously treated patients. The median duration of response has not been reached at 40+ months. The median follow-up time in this study is 44 months (range, 15 to 66 months). In patients positive for the 14;18 translocation in blood and/or marrow at enrollment, molecular remission was achieved in 88% of cases, with patients remaining negative for up to 4 years to date. Hematologic toxicity was manageable, and except for a 15% incidence of herpes simplex/zoster infections, infectious complications were rare. Nonhematologic toxicities were minimal. CONCLUSION: Rituximab plus fludarabine was well tolerated and associated with an excellent complete response rate, including molecular remissions, in patients with low-grade or follicular lymphoma.     

Incidence of Hypogammaglobulinemia in Patients Receiving Rituximab and the Use of Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Recurrent Infections

BackgroundRituximab has altered the treatment approach to B-cell malignancies and other diseases. Reports consider that rituximab had limited impact on serum immunoglobulins. However, anecdotes suggest that rituximab can cause symptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia. This retrospective study examined the relationship among rituximab, hypogammaglobulinemia, and treatment of symptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG).MethodsPatients with serial quantitative serum immunoglobulin (SIgG) concentrations before and subsequent to rituximab administration at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center were identified. Information regarding rituximab administration, SIgG concentrations, frequency of infection, and administration of IVIG were recorded.ResultsBetween December 1998 and April 2009, 211 patients with B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab and with serial SIgG concentrations were identified. One hundred seventy-nine (85%) patients had normal SIgG before rituximab, 32 (15%) had low SIgG. After rituximab use, hypogammaglobulinemia was identified in 38.54% of patients with initially normal SIgG. The risk was greater in patients who received maintenance rituximab. Symptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia that prompted IVIG administration developed in 6.6% of patients.ConclusionsIn this data set, rituximab administration was associated with a high frequency of hypogammaglobulinemia, particularly symptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia, among patients who received multiple courses of rituximab. Baseline and periodic monitoring of SIgGs is appropriate in patients who receive rituximab.     

Prognostic factors for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients treated with chemotherapy may not predict outcome in patients treated with rituximab

Several factors predict outcome for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) after chemotherapy. However, predictors of response to rituximab have not been identified. Baseline characteristics for 166 NHL patients (130 follicular) in a phase III trial of rituximab were analysed by univariate and multivariate methods to determine whether any of 27 factors predict response and/or response duration. In a univariate analysis, response to rituximab was associated with follicular histology, no prior fludarabine therapy, prior autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT), lack of bone marrow involvement or extranodal disease, positive bcl-2 in blood, and fewer relapses. By univariate analysis, longer median time to progression (TTP) and/or duration of response (DR) after rituximab therapy was associated with International Prognostic Index lower-risk group, multiagent chemotherapy, and low/normal serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) or beta2 microglobulin. In the multivariate analysis, response to rituximab correlated with follicular histology, prior ABMT, multiagent chemotherapy, and no bone marrow involvement; longer TTP and/or DR correlated with low/normal serum LDH or beta2 microglobulin, high CD3+ cells, and response to last chemotherapy. The follicular lymphoma international prognostic index (FLIPI) did not correlate consistently with response to rituximab or response duration. Several factors associated with prognosis following chemotherapy did not correlate with response to rituximab or response duration. NHL patients can respond to rituximab despite having factors associated with a poor outcome to chemotherapy.     

Fludarabine plus mitoxantrone with and without rituximab versus CHOP with and without rituximab as front-line treatment for patients with follicular lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Promising new therapeutic options for follicular lymphoma (FL) include fludarabine plus mitoxantrone (FM) and the mouse/human anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab. We performed a randomized comparative trial of FM with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) front-line chemotherapy with and without sequential rituximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All previously untreated CD20(+) FL patients presenting in 15 Italian cooperative institutions from October 1999 were randomly allocated to FM or CHOP. Following clinical or molecular restaging, patients in complete remission (CR) with bcl-2/IgH negativity (CR(-)) received no further treatment; those in CR with bcl-2/IgH positivity (CR(+)) received rituximab, as did those in partial remission (PR) with bcl-2/IgH negativity (PR(-)) or positivity (PR(+)); nonresponders (NR subgroup) were off study. RESULTS: After chemotherapy, the FM arm achieved higher rates of CR (68% [49 of 72 patients] v 42% [29 of 68 patients]; P =.003) and CR(-) (39% [28 of 72 patients] v 13 of 68 patients [19%]; P =.001). Rituximab elicited CR(-) in 55 of 95 treated patients (58%). The final CR(-) rate was higher in the FM arm (71% [51 of 72 patients] v 51% [35 of 68 patients]; P =.01). However, with a median follow-up of 19 months (range, 9 to 37 months), no statistically significant difference was found among the various study arms in terms of both progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that FM is superior to CHOP for front-line treatment of FL and that rituximab is an effective sequential treatment option. However, they also confirm that this superiority is unlikely to translate into either better PFS or OS.     

Superior quality and duration of responses among patients with mantle-cell lymphoma treated with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with or without rituximab compared with prior responses to CHOP

Sixteen patients with relapsed mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) were treated with the combination of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC) with or without rituximab. All patients had received prior CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone) chemotherapy, with a response rate of 63.5% (25% complete response), and a median duration of response of 10 months (range 1-32 months). Subsequent treatment with FC +/- rituximab produced a response rate of 75% with a higher complete response rate (56% P = 0.07 vs. CHOP), and a median duration of response of 11 months (4-25+ months). This study demonstrates that FC is a highly active regimen in patients relapsing following CHOP chemotherapy.     

氟达拉滨联合化疗治疗初治滤泡型淋巴瘤的临床观察

目的:评价氟达拉滨联合化疗治疗初治滤泡型淋巴瘤的疗效和不良反应。方法:研究对象为本院确诊的30例初治滤泡型淋巴瘤患者,其中17例接受FC(氟达拉滨+环磷酰胺)方案治疗,13例接受R-FC(利妥昔单抗+氟达拉滨+环磷酰胺)方案治疗。所有患者均接受2～6个周期的化疗,中位化疗周期数为4.5个周期。结果:30例患者中达完全缓解者26例(86.7%),部分缓解者1例(3.3%),总有效率为90.0%。在各项临床因素中,只有Ki-67表达阳性率对完全缓解有明显影响(P=0.031)。全部30例患者的1、2、3和4年无进展生存率分别为90%、85%、85%和63%。单因素分析发现,国际预后指数评分、Ki-67阳性率、血清乳酸脱氢酶及能否获得完全缓解对无进展生存的影响有统计学意义(P<0.05)。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制、免疫抑制和轻度胃肠道反应。有51.0%的化疗周期发生白细胞计数下降,10.5%的化疗周期发生血小板减少,33.0%的化疗周期发生胃肠反应。全组患者的带状疱疹发生率为30.0%,其中R-FC组的带状疱疹发生率为46.2%,FC组的带状疱疹发生率为17.6%。结论:氟达拉滨为主的联合化疗方案治疗初治滤泡型淋巴瘤的临床缓解率较高,无病生存时间较长,且不良反应可以耐受。     

The addition of rituximab to fludarabine improves clinical outcome in untreated patients with ZAP-70-negative chronic lymphocytic leukemia

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies in combination with chemotherapy have reported previously unattained response rates in patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL); however, the analysis of ZAP-70 protein and/or CD38 may explain better the discordant outcomes independent of treatment. METHODS: The authors conducted a Phase II study, in which rituximab was added to fludarabine for patients with symptomatic, untreated CLL, to evaluate clinical outcomes. Sixty patients with B-CLL received 6 monthly courses of fludarabine (25 mg/m(2) for 5 days) followed by 4 weekly doses of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: On the basis of National Cancer Institute criteria, 47 of 60 patients (78%) achieved a complete remission, 9 of 60 patients (15%) achieved a partial remission, and 4 of 60 patients (7%) had no response or progressive disease. It is noteworthy that the patients experienced a long progression-free survival (PFS) from treatment (68% at 3 yrs). A significantly shorter PFS was observed in ZAP-70-positive patients (25% vs. 100% at 3 yrs; P = 0.00005), in CD38-positive patients (18% vs. 91% at 3 yrs; P = 0.0002), and in patients who had more minimal residual disease (36% vs. 77% at 2.5 yrs; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: With the addition of rituximab to fludarabine, improved clinical outcomes were obtained, and the stratification of patients by using ZAP-70 and CD38 may help clinicians offer more aggressive and/or experimental approaches to the treatment of patients with high-risk B-CLL subtypes.     

Rituximab therapy is effective for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders after solid organ transplantation: results of a phase II trial

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) remain an uncommon complication of solid organ transplantation with a high mortality rate reported after conventional therapies. Alternative treatments such as rituximab have been explored. METHODS: Eleven patients with PTLD, who were CD20 positive, received an intravenous dose of rituximab, 375 mg/m2, weekly x 4 weeks, repeated every 6 months for 2 years in responding patients. The median age of the patients was 56 years (range, 43-68 yrs), and 9 patients were male. The type of solid organ transplantation that these patients received included lung (five patients), kidney (four patients), heart (one patient), and kidney/pancreas (one patient). The median time from transplantation to a PTLD diagnosis was 9 months (range, 1-122 mos). Diagnostic B-cell histology was diffuse large cell lymphoma or polymorphous process. No patient had bone marrow or central nervous system involvement. Primary extranodal disease was noted in 82% of patients. Immunosuppressive therapy was decreased at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: Rituximab was well tolerated, with mild infusional blood pressure alterations noted in two patients. The median follow-up period was 10 months (range, 1-32 mos). The overall response rate was 64%, with 6 complete responses (CR), 1 partial response, 2 cases of progressive disease, and 2 deaths. The median duration of CR was 8 months (range, 2-19+ mos). The median time to treatment failure was 10 months (range, 5-25+ mos). The median survival was 14 months (range, < 1-32+ mos). Four patients were alive at the time of last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent rituximab may offer a response and survival advantage in patients with PTLD. Further evaluation of rituximab in these disorders, potentially in combination with other therapies, is warranted.     

Combination therapy with fludarabine and rituximab followed by alemtuzumab in the first-line treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma: a phase 2 trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of fludarabine and rituximab, followed by alemtuzumab, as first-line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). METHODS: In a nonrandomized phase 2 trial, 41 patients who had previously untreated CLL or SLL and required treatment received 4 cycles of the fludarabine and rituximab combination followed 5 weeks later by 4 weeks (12 doses) of intravenous alemtuzumab therapy. The response to treatment was evaluated after completion of treatment with fludarabine and rituximab, and again after the completion of alemtuzumab consolidation. RESULTS: Initial treatment with the combination of fludarabine and rituximab was well tolerated, and produced a 71% overall response rate (13% complete response). Thirty-four patients began treatment with intravenous alemtuzumab, but this drug was relatively poorly tolerated when given at a short interval after fludarabine and rituximab, and only 20 patients (49% of total) were able to complete the prescribed course. Five patients had an improvement in their response with alemtuzumab; the final complete response rate was 21%. The median progression-free survival for the entire group was 42 months. Toxicity with alemtuzumab included infusion-related toxicity, myelosuppression, and opportunistic infections. CONCLUSIONS: The intravenous schedule of alemtuzumab employed in the trial was relatively poorly tolerated in this community-based trial. The relatively low complete response rates after treatment with the combination of fludarabine and rituximab and after the completion of treatment suggest that these abbreviated courses may compromise efficacy. The generalized use of alemtuzumab as consolidation therapy cannot yet be recommended for community practice. However, optimization of the route of administration, duration of treatment, and interval after completion of induction therapy may improve efficacy, and further investigation is ongoing.     

Serum immunoglobulins in B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Natural history and prognostic significance

To investigate the prognostic significance of gammaglobulin and immunoglobulin levels in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), survival studies were performed in a series of patients with that disorder. The survival probability of patients with initial levels of gammaglobulin of less than 700 mg/dl was significantly lower (P = 0.03) than in patients with initial levels of 700 mg/dl or more. Decreased initial levels of IgG and IgA also were associated with reduced survival probability (P = 0.027 and P = 0.014, respectively), whereas hypo-IgM did not show any influence on survival. When the influence on survival of gammaglobulin and immunoglobulin concentration was analyzed by Cox's multivariate model, the only variable which entered the regression at significant level was IgA (P = 0.006). As shown by the same type of analysis, the prognostic value of hypo-IgA is independent from the clinical staging. The natural history of hypogammaglobulinemia and hypoimmunoglobulinemia was investigated by sequential analysis in a series of untreated patients. The appearance of decreased levels of these globulins was found to be a continuous process developing spontaneously during the untreated course of the disease. Among factors associated with the appearance of hypogammaglobulinemia during the evolution of CLL, initial lower levels of IgG and IgA, but not IgM, were found in a multivariate analysis.     

Serum globulins as marker of immune restoration after treatment with high-dose rituximab for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

An important biological alteration in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the dysregulation of immunoglobulin production, as a consequence of complex and yet incompletely understood interactions between plasma cells and the neoplastic B-cell clone. As a result, most patients develop severe hypogammaglobulinemia during the course of the disease. Fourteen patients were analyzed retrospectively for changes in globulins produced by antineoplastic treatments. During maximum response to fludarabine, chlorambucil, and overall rituximab, the mean levels of globulins were 2.500, 2.752, and 3.018 g/dl. The mean increase in globulins during clinical response to individual treatments compared to pre-treatment values were 0.050 g/dl for fludarabine, 0.302 g/dl for chlorambucil, 0.267 g/dl for low-dose rituximab, and 0.346 g/dl for high-dose rituximab. Overall, treatment with rituximab produced an average increase in globulins at clinical response of 11.6%, which increased further to 17.3% at maximum clinical response. Serum globulins increased significantly compared with pre-treatment values at maximum clinical response to rituximab overall (P = 0.001) and high-dose rituximab (P = 0.001), but no statistical significance occurred in the cases of fludarabine (P = 0.5), chlorambucil/prednisone (P = 0.14), and low-dose rituximab (P = 0.07). Serum globulins levels correlate with disease status (complete responders versus partial responders and stable disease groups), but not with peripheral neoplastic load. Therefore, although rituximab is efficient in decreasing the tumor burden, additional mechanisms may be involved in relieving suppressive effects on immunoglobulin-producing cells, which especially manifest at high doses of the agent. Use of high doses of rituximab in CLL can avoid T-cell dysfunction and neutropenia, and is associated with humoral immunorestorative effects. No other relationship with pharmaceutical companies and no financial interests or relationships apply to the authors of this article. This work was presented in part in abstract form as: Alexandrescu DT, Hugec VS, Dutcher JP, Wiernik PH. Serum globulins as marker of immunologic restoration in chronic lymphocytic leukemia after treatment with high-dose rituximab. Proc. International Society for Biological Therapy of Cancer (iSBTc). J Immunother 2005;28(6):628–9.     

Anthracycline‐fludarabine‐containing regimens with or without rituximab in the treatment of patients with advanced follicular lymphoma

BACKGROUND:

Recent experience has suggested that there has been a stepwise improvement in the survival outcomes of patients who have follicular lymphoma with the introduction of new treatment options. In the current study, the authors report the results of 2 subsequent phase 2 trials of 238 previously untreated patients.

METHODS:

In a trial of bleomycin, epidoxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (BACOP) plus fludarabine, mitoxantrone, and dexamethasone (FND), 144 patients received 2 BACOP treatments followed by 4 FND treatments. In a trial of BACOP plus fludarabine and rituximab (FR), 94 patients received 3 BACOP treatments followed by 4 FR treatments.

RESULTS:

The complete remission (CR) rate for BACOP/FND was 62%. After a median follow‐up of 60 months, the failure‐free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 4 years were 53% and 77%, respectively. The CR rate for BACOP/FR was 79%. After a median follow‐up of 36 months, the FFS and OS rates at 4 years were 56% and 97%, respectively, which were significant compared with the CR and OS rates achieved with BACOP/FND. Twenty‐five of 42 bcl‐2‐positive patients attained a molecularly negative CR and had improved FFS. No significant differences were observed between the 2 trials in the percentage of infections or neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS:

The CR and OS rates achieved with BACOP/FR were better, and overall toxicity did not increase. Furthermore, patients who received rituximab had a better FFS compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone. Finally, although conclusions between nonrandomized groups may depend on differences in observed and unobserved prognostic features, the current results suggested that the addition of rituximab to anthracycline‐fludarabine–containing regimens have a favorable effect on the prognosis of patients with advanced follicular lymphoma. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

A high tumor-associated macrophage content predicts favorable outcome in follicular lymphoma patients treated with rituximab and cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisone.

PURPOSE: Tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) content predicts survival in follicular lymphoma (FL) patients treated with chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine how combination of rituximab with chemotherapy influences TAM-associated clinical outcome. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Expression of a macrophage marker, CD68, was determined immunohistochemically from FL samples of 96 patients treated with rituximab and cyclophosphamide-Adriamycin-vincristine-prednisone regimen. Of them, 71 received therapy at diagnosis and 25 at relapse. Neutrophil and CD3+ lymphocyte counts were also measured. The median follow-up time for the cohort was 54 months. Fourty-five patients previously treated with chemotherapy served as a control group. RESULTS: Consistent with previous studies, high TAM amount was associated with adverse outcome in chemotherapy-treated patients (P = 0.026). In contrast, after rituximab and cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisone regimen, high TAM content correlated with longer survival rates. According to Kaplan Meier estimates, the median progression free survival (PFS) was not reached for patients with high TAM content compared with 45 months for patients with low TAM scores (P = 0.006). A trend toward a better overall survival (OS) at 5 years was also observed for patients with high TAM content (OS, 97% versus 90%, P = 0.116). The positive prognostic value of TAMs was seen both for the patients treated at diagnosis and at relapse. In multivariate analyses, TAM content remained an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. Neutrophil and CD3+ lymphocyte counts did not correlate with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that high TAM score is associated with a favorable prognosis in FL patients treated with immunochemotherapy.     

Antibody therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a promising new modality

Therapeutic options for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have been limited, with low complete response rates (CR) and no treatments demonstrating a survival advantage. The recent introduction of the monoclonal antibodies rituximab and alemtuzumab into clinical trials for patients with CLL has generated promising results. Rituximab targets the CD20 antigen and demonstrates varied single-agent activity that is highly dependent upon the dosing schedule and treatment status of the patient. More importantly, when rituximab is combined with fludarabine or fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, a high frequency of CR and prolonged progression-free survival are observed without an appreciable increase in significant toxicity. Alemtuzumab targets the more ubiquitously expressed CD52 antigen and is therefore associated with a higher frequency of toxicity, particularly immunosuppression, but has appreciable activity in fludarabine refractory CLL. Additionally, alemtuzumab is effective against CLL clones that have p53 mutations or deletions. Future efforts in developing combination strategies with rituximab, alemtuzumab, and potentially other new antibodies offer great promise for the future treatment of CLL.     

The role of fludarabine in the treatment of follicular and mantle cell lymphoma

Advanced-stage follicular lymphoma (FL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cannot be cured using conventional chemotherapy. Fludarabine, the most widely used purine analog, exhibits a particularly high level of activity against small lymphocytic lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Numerous studies have investigated the efficacy of fludarabine as a single agent or in combination with other cytostatic compounds in the treatment of FL and MCL. Hematologic toxicity is the most commonly observed adverse event in patients treated with fludarabine, but serious infectious complications are relatively rare. Fludarabine monotherapy has proven to be particularly effective in the treatment of FL; however, complete responses (CRs) are observed in only approximately 20-40% of all cases. In contrast, combinations containing fludarabine and anthracyclines or alkylating agents have yielded superior response rates and longer periods of progression-free survival (PFS), and the addition of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab appears to yield even better results. In a randomized trial, an immunochemotherapy regimen consisting of a fludarabine-containing combination and rituximab resulted in superior remission and survival rates compared with the fludarabine-containing combination alone. In summary, fludarabine has proven to be a safe and effective agent in the treatment of indolent lymphoma. In particular, combinations containing fludarabine, anthracyclines and/or alkylating agents, and rituximab have yielded remarkable CR and PFS rates. Consequently, current research efforts have focused on the use of fludarabine-containing combinations in the first-line treatment of FL and MCL.     

Phase I study of bryostatin 1 and fludarabine in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent (non-Hodgkin's) lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Preclinical studies suggested that bryostatin 1 might potentiate the therapeutic effects of fludarabine in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. We undertook a phase I study to identify appropriate schedules and doses of bryostatin 1 and fludarabine to be used in phase II studies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or indolent lymphoma received fludarabine daily for 5 days and a single dose of bryostatin 1 via a 24-hour continuous infusion either before or after the fludarabine course. Doses were escalated in successive patients until recommended phase II doses for each sequence were identified on the basis of dose-limiting toxic events. RESULTS: Bryostatin 1 can be administered safely and tolerably with full dose fludarabine (25 mg/m(2)/d x 5). The recommended bryostatin 1 phase II dose is 50 microg/m(2) for both sequences, bryostatin 1 --> fludarabine and fludarabine --> bryostatin 1. The combination is active against both CLL and indolent lymphomas with responses seen in patients who had been previously treated with fludarabine. Correlative studies do not support the hypothesis that bryostatin 1 potentiates fludarabine activity through down-regulation of protein kinase C in target cells. CONCLUSIONS: Bryostatin 1 can be administered with full dose fludarabine, and the combination is moderately active in patients with persistent disease following prior treatment. In view of the activity of monoclonal antibodies such as the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab in the treatment of CLL and indolent lymphomas, the concept of combining bryostatin 1 and fludarabine with rituximab warrants future consideration.     

Phase II study of oral fludarabine in combination with rituximab for relapsed indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Oral fludarabine is more convenient than intravenous fludarabine in an outpatient setting. To assess the efficacy and toxicity of oral fludarabine in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), we conducted a multicenter phase II study. Patients with relapsed indolent B-NHL with two or fewer prior regimens and up to 16 doses of rituximab were eligible. Patients received 375 mg/m² rituximab on day 1, and 40 mg/m² oral fludarabine once daily on days 1 through 5 every 28 days for up to six cycles. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate. Forty-one patients were enrolled, including 38 (93%) with follicular lymphoma. Thirty-four patients (83%) had received rituximab as prior therapy. Twenty-seven patients (66%) completed the planned six cycles. Dose reduction of oral fludarabine was required in 17 patients (41%). The overall response rate was 76% (31 of 41 patients; 95% confidence interval, 60–88%) with a complete response rate of 68% (28 of 41 patients; 95% confidence interval, 52–82%). Median progression-free survival for the 41 patients was 19.7 months (95% confidence interval, 12.3–26.5 months). Hematological toxicities, including grade 4 neutropenia (68%), were the most frequent toxicities. Non-hematological toxicities were mild, except for one patient who died of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia 4 months after the protocol treatment. In conclusion, oral fludarabine in combination with rituximab is a highly effective and convenient therapy for patients with relapsed indolent B-NHL who have mostly been pretreated with rituximab. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00311129.) ( Cancer Sci  2009; 100: 1951–1956)     

Screening and early diagnosis in lung cancer

Over the last few years, several monoclonal antibodies have been investigated in patients with B-cell lymphoid malignancies. Rituximab is the most important monoclonal antibody of clinical value in these disorders. Rituximab is an IgG1 chimeric antibody containing murine light- and heavy-chain variable region sequences and human constant region sequences. Since approval in 1997, rituximab has become the standard of care in follicular B-cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and aggressive lymphoma when combined with chemotherapy. Higher clinical benefits of rituximab can be seen in patients with CLL when it is added to other chemotherapeutic agents. Several recent reports have suggested that in patients with CLL, rituximab combined with purine nucleoside analogs (PNAs) or PNAs and cyclophosphamide may improve the results with acceptable toxicity, both in previously untreated and refractory/relapsed patients. The randomized, multinational Phase III study (REACH trial) has shown that rituximab combined with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (R-FC regimen) results in 10 months longer progression-free survival, and higher overall response and complete response rates than fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC regimen) in previously treated patients. The German CLL study group initiated a multicenter, multinational Phase III trial, CLL8, to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of R-FC versus FC for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced CLL. The overall response rate was significantly higher in the R-FC arm (95%) compared with FC (88%). The complete response rate in the R-FC arm was 44% compared with 27% in the FC arm. The recently updated analysis has demonstrated longer overall survival in the R-FC group. Recent clinical observations have revealed that combinations of rituximab with pentostatin and cyclophosphamide, or cladribine and cyclophosphamide are also highly active regimens in previously untreated CLL. In addition, the results of treatment with high-dose methylprednisolone in combination with rituximab in advanced CLL resistant to fludarabine have been reported recently by several groups. However, available therapies are only partially effective in CLL, exposing an obvious need to develop new, more specific and active drugs. Recently, several new anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have been developed and are now being evaluated in clinical trials.     

Combined fludarabine and rituximab for low grade lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia

As both fludarabine and rituximab are active against indolent lymphoproliferative disorders, we have studied the combination of fludarabine and rituximab in patients with low-grade lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in phase I/II fashion. Of 33 patients enrolled, 21(63.6%) had low-grade lymphoma and 12 (36.4%) had CLL. They received fludarabine 30 mg/m 2 on days 1-4 and rituximab 125, 250 or 375 mg/m 2 on day 5 at intervals of 28 days to a maximum of 8 cycles. Three patients were removed from the study because of rituximab-associated anaphylaxis and four because of prolonged hematopoietic toxicity. Toxicity and responsiveness did not differ at the different dose levels of rituximab. For 29 evaluable patients, responses were seen in 82.8% and complete responses in 34.5%. Of 7 responding patients not referred for stem cell transplantation, 6 remain in complete remission at a median follow-up of 16 months (range 4-30 months). Of 13 previously untreated patients, all responded and 46.2% had a complete response. Of 16 previously treated patients, 68.5% responded and 25% had a complete response. The combination of fludarabine and rituximab has major activity and acceptable toxicity in patients with low-grade lymphoma and CLL.