主动脉内球囊反搏在高危冠状动脉旁路移植手术中的预防性应用

目的 探讨主动脉内球囊反搏(LABP)在高危冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)围术期预防性应用的效果.方法 41例高危CABG病人围术期应用IABP辅助,其中20例为预防性应用(Y组),21例为CABG围术期发生严重低心排被迫应用(B组).术前两组性别、年龄、体表面积、心功能、射血分数、病变程度基本一致,仅冠心病合并室壁瘤情况,Y组显著高于B组(70%对38.1%P=0.04).结果 Y组与B组生存率为95.0%对85.7%(P=0.31),IABP应用时间为(72.5±28.91)h对(97.47±47.70)h,(P=0.02),术中严重低血压或心律失常发生率5%对66.7%(P<0.0001).术后呼吸机应用时间(22.0±1.6)h对(39.6±2.1)h(P=0.0015)、ICU停留时间(58.0±1.5)h对(98.5±1.9)h(P=0.003).结论 IABP的预防性应用为高危CABG病人提供了安全保障,术中严重低血压或心律失常发生率低,病情恢复快.     

Intra-aortic balloon cardiac assist: complication rates for the surgical and percutaneous insertion techniques

A retrospective study was performed to evaluate complications with the two most common intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) insertion techniques. During a nine year period, 202 patients (51 women, 151 men) underwent IABP cardiac assist utilizing the arteriotomy surgical (103 balloons) and percutaneous (99 balloons) insertion techniques. Complications, including asymptomatic loss of pedal pulse, vascular-symptomatic, infection, or balloon rupture occurred in 22.8 per cent of patients. Of the 54 complications, 13 (24%) were asymptomatic loss of pedal pulse, 36 (66.7%) were vascular symptomatic, three (5.5%) were infection, and two (3.7%) were balloon malfunctions. The overall complication rates were 16/103 (15.5%) and 38/99 (38.3%) for the surgical and percutaneous methods, respectively (P = 0.007). Thirty two per cent (33/103) of the patients receiving IABP surgically and 24 per cent (24/99) of those receiving IABP percutaneously died in the hospital (P = 0.34); no death was directly attributable to IABP. The number of patients requiring surgical intervention or removal was not significantly different between the surgical and percutaneous methods (9 versus 18%, P = .06). While the method of IABP insertion did not significantly alter hospital mortality, a significantly greater complication rate was observed with percutaneous insertion (P = .007). This was particularly relevant to complications occurring at the time of removal of IABP.     

主动脉内球囊反搏在主动脉瓣轻、轻中度反流患者中的应用

目的探讨主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)在主动脉瓣轻度和轻中度反流患者中使用的有效性和安全性。方法回顾性分析2006年9月至2011年1月上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院心脏手术后15例主动脉瓣轻中度反流伴左心室射血分数(LVEF)显著减低(40.00%)患者行IABP辅助的临床资料,其中男11例,女4例;平均年龄63.60(50～74)岁。主动脉瓣轻度反流9例,轻中度反流6例,LVEF均40.00%。术后放置IABP,比较患者使用IABP前后的平均动脉压(MAP)、心脏指数(CI)、全身血管阻力指数(SVRI)、肺循环阻力指数(PVRI)、LVEF、主动脉瓣反流等指标。结果本组患者无死亡,患者使用IABP后CI较术前明显改善,差异有统计学意义[(3.30±0.29)L/(min.m2)vs.(1.99±0.23)L/(min.m2),t=48.30,P=0.00],LVEF高于使用IABP前,差异有统计学意义(37.20%±1.37%vs.42.60%±2.87%,t=11.34,P=0.00),SVRI较使用IABP前改善,差异也有统计学意义[(2 347.00±190.00)dyn s/(cm5 m2)vs.(2 128.00±204.00)dyn s/(cm5.m2),t=20.60,P=0.00],主动脉瓣反流未见明显增加(χ2=0.60,P=0.44)。结论对主动脉瓣轻度和轻中度反流伴LVEF显著减低患者心脏手术后进行IABP辅助具有明显的循环支持效果,且未增加主动脉瓣反流的风险。     

Complications Related to Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiac Surgery: A Decade Later

BACKGROUND: Our centre in 1995 reported 26% of vascular complications in cardiac surgical patients treated with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). However, during the last decade there have been improvements in IABP technology and insertion techniques. We aimed to evaluate the impact of these changes on the incidence of IABP-related complications in cardiac surgery. METHODS: Demographics, indications, technique and complication rate in 186 consecutive patients treated with IABP from January 1994 to December 1998 (Group I) were compared with 323 consecutive patients treated with IABP from January 1999 to December 2003 (Group II) at our regional cardiothoracic centre. Data was variably expressed as mean with or without range and either standard deviation or range. Statistical significance was accepted at P<0.05. RESULTS: There were 121 (65%) and 194 (60%) males in Group I and II, respectively. The mean age was 66+/-12.1 (17-88) years and the mean duration of IAPB use was 43.5h (range 3-144 h). Overall complication rate was 10% in Group I and 2% in Group II whereas vascular complications accounted for 3% in Group-I and 1% in Group-II. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated cardiogenic shock being strongly correlated to in-hospital mortality (OR 4.68; P=0.004) followed by older age (OR 3.12; P=0.034) and ejection fraction <35% (OR 1.78; P=0.03). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated a significant decrease in the IABP-related complications even though complexity of cases referred for surgery has increased. Henceforth, the risk of 1% vascular complications should play little influence on decision-making regarding the use of IABP.     

Aggregate risk score for predicting mortality after surgical biopsy for interstitial lung disease

In order to develop a practical risk score for 90-day mortality following surgical lung biopsy (SLB) for interstitial lung disease (ILD) we reviewed 311 consecutive patients undergoing SLB for ILD between 2002 and 2009. Postoperative complication, 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 11.5%, 9% and 10.6% respectively. Univariable and multivariable analyses, validated by bootstrap statistics, were used to identify factors associated with 90-day mortality. A scoring system was developed by proportionally weighting the regression coefficients of the significant predictors of 90-day mortality: age >67 (P < 0.0001, weighted score 1.5), preoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission (P = 0.006, weighted score 2), immunosuppressive treatment (P = 0.004, weighted score 1.5) and open surgery (P = 0.03, weighted score 1). Patients were grouped in four classes showing incremental risk of death at 90 days: class A, score 0 (2%); class B, score 1-2 (12%); class C, score 2.5-3 (40%); class D, score >3 (86%); P <0.0001). SLB entails a considerable surgical risk with an overall 90-day mortality around 10%. We were able to develop a practical risk score which, if validated by other independent studies, can be easily used to stratify the risk of SLB candidates and assess the cost-effectiveness of this procedure.     

Myocardial protection with insulin cardioplegia: who can really benefit?

AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects on myocardial protection of insulin-enriched warm blood cardioplegia (IWBC) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and in subgroups of patients with associated cardiac co-morbidities. METHODS: Between May 2000 and December 2002, 268 consecutive patients underwent CABG with warm blood cardioplegia (group A) or IWBC (10 UI/L) (group B). Hospital outcome, ECG, echocardiography and biochemical markers of ischemia were compared. Differences between subgroups of patients with unstable angina (UA), ventricular hypertrophy (VH) and diabetes were assessed. RESULTS: Hospital mortality, incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction and low output syndrome, IABP requirement, postoperative atrial fibrillation, in-hospital and in-ITU stay, postoperative recovery of left ventricular function and enzyme leakage did not show differences between the 2 groups; inotropic support was lower in IWBC. Moreover, patients with UA and IWBC showed a lower troponin I (TnI) (12 h: 0.82+/-0.57 ng/mL vs 2.56+/-1.18, P < 0.0001; 24 h: 0.71+/-0.64 vs 2.16+/-1.52, P < 0.0001; 48 h: 0.69+/-1.13 vs 1.79+/-1.43, P = 0.001; 72 h: 0.44+/-0.83 vs 1.01+/-1.02, P = 0.001), lower incidence of atrial fibrillation (4.2% versus 60.6%; P < 0.0001) and intraoperative defibrillation (0% versus 27.3%; P = 0.007). Furthermore, patients with VH treated with IWBC showed lower level of TnI (12 h: 0.41+/-0.32 ng/mL vs 2.93+/-0.67, P < 0.0001; 24 h: 0.37+/-0.45 vs 2.40+/-1.28, P < 0.0001; 48 h: 0.22+/-0.18 vs 1.95+/-1.33, P < 0.0001; 72 h: 0.12+/-0.12 vs 1.31+/-1.56, P < 0.0001), lower atrial fibrillation (6.5% vs 48%, P < 0.0001) and ventricular defibrillation (0% vs 20%, P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Insulin addiction to blood cardioplegia does not show any benefit in the global population and in diabetics; nevertheless, better myocardial protection can be demonstrated in patients with unstable angina and left ventricular hypertrophy.     

Perioperative heart failure in coronary surgery and timing of intra‐aortic balloon pump insertion

Background: Perioperative heart failure (HF) in coronary operations is accompanied by a high operative mortality rate. An intra‐aortic balloon pump (IABP) is often used to treat this syndrome. The correct timing for IABP insertion after completion of the operation has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the operative mortality in perioperative HF patients who had undergone coronary operations with respect to the early or the late use of IABP. Methods: This is a retrospective study including 7,270 patients who had undergone coronary surgery with or without associated procedures. A population of patients with perioperative HF was extracted and analyzed with respect to the use of drugs, intra‐operative or post‐operative IABP to treat this condition. Results: A total of 1,051 (14.5%) patients had perioperative HF. The mortality rate in this group was 13.5%. Early (intra‐operative) IABP insertion was performed in 123 patients. In contrast, 928 patients were treated with inotropic drugs only, and, of these patients, 59 developed a drug‐refractory HF requiring late IABP insertion. Operative mortality was significantly (P=0.001) higher in patients requiring late (64.4%) vs. early (41.5%) IABP insertion. Independent risk factors for developing a drug‐refractory HF were age, pre‐operative serum creatinine value and an associated mitral valve procedure. Conclusions: Postponing the use of IABP may be deleterious in patients with drug‐refractory HF. In the presence of the three factors independently associated with the risk of a drug‐refractory HF, early IABP insertion is suggested.     

Current results with intraaortic balloon pumping in infants and children

BACKGROUND: Intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) is useful for support in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction. IABP is usually timed with the R wave of the electrocardiogram. We have utilized M-mode echocardiography timed IABP in children with left-side heart failure since 1994. Electrocardiogram timing seems inappropriate for children, who have much higher heart rates. We describe our experience with children who underwent IABP therapy before and after 1994, when echocardiographic timing was instituted. METHODS: We reviewed records of 29 children who underwent IABP for all indications at Primary Children's Medical Center since 1988. RESULTS: Overall survival was 62.1% (18 of 29) in this series. Survival was similar for infants (odds ratio = 2.0, 95% confidence interval = 0.29 to 14.31, p = 0.43) and older children. Survival was similar in the echocardiography era when compared with the electrocardiogram era (odds ratio = 2.4, 95% confidence interval = 0.56 to 10.4, p = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: IABP is a useful means of support in children with left ventricular dysfunction. M-mode echocardiography is effective in triggering IABP. The sample size in this study is too small to detect a mortality rate difference.     

Combined Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump support to improve both ventricular unloading and coronary blood flow for myocardial recovery: an experimental study

Abstract:  Some patients in need of hemodynamic support do not respond to intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) therapy. Hemodynamic stability can then be obtained by a more potent cardiac assist device, like the Impella catheter pump. Whether additional IABP support additional to Impella support can provide more optimal hemodynamic myocardial conditions is examined in this study. Seven sheep were implemented with IABP and Impella. An acute myocardial infarction was induced. Hemodynamic performance was assessed during baseline, during Impella support and IABP support individually, and during the combined Impella plus IABP support. The Impella support provided a reduction of afterload with 30% and an increase of coronary artery flow with 47%. The IABP increased coronary artery flow (13%), carotid artery flow (16%), and aortic ascending blood pressure (6%); a similar (but stronger) effect was provided when using the IABP support additional to Impella support and, respectively, increases of 33, 21, and 19% were established. The oxygen demand–supply ratio decreased by 25% due to the extra use of the IABP. A combination of IABP and Impella provides the most optimal hemodynamic myocardial conditions compared to either stand-alone support.     

Use of an intraaortic balloon pump in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

Prophylactic use of an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) prior to open-heart surgery in patients with impaired left ventricular function is still under debate. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% were therefore compared according to time of IABP placement, viz. preoperative (n = 56), intraoperative (n = 40) or postoperative (n = 17), and also with patients who did not receive mechanical support despite LVEF < 40% (n = 78). The main indication for preoperative IABP insertion was severely impaired left ventricular function (80%), while patients with intraoperative or postoperative IABP placement mainly presented with low cardiac-output syndrome (70%/53%). Preoperative IABP was associated with a low mortality rate (8.9%), whereas patients with intraoperative or postoperative IABP placement had a high mortality risk and an increased catecholamine requirement. Of the patients scheduled for surgery without prophylactic IABP, 19% required intra- or postoperative insertion. Prophylactic placement of IABP thus reduced the mortality rate as well as the postoperative need for mechanical and catecholamine support. Need for intraoperative IABP insertion was associated with high mortality, whereas the outcome after postoperative IABP placement depended on the indication for the measure.     

The impact of diffuseness of coronary artery disease on the outcomes of patients undergoing primary and reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE: Diffuse coronary artery disease jeopardizes myocardium, increasing surgical mortality in primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We sought to determine the impact of diffuseness on pre- and post-discharge outcomes for both primary and reoperative CABG (REOP). METHODS: Using a validated system for measuring diffuseness of coronary disease, preoperative angiograms were scored for primary CABG (n=792) and REOP cases (n=268) performed 1997-2004. A diffuseness score (DS)>18 was defined as elevated. In-hospital mortality, intermediate-term survival, and in-hospital composite outcome (COMP) (one or more of: mortality, stroke, MI, deep sternal infection, sepsis, IABP insertion, or return to OR) were examined. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality and COMP for patients with DS>18 were significantly higher (7.9% vs 2.4%, p<0.0001), (17.8% vs 9.2%, p<0.0001). DS (mean+/-SD) was higher in REOP cases than primary CABG (18.9+/-7.1 vs 14.4+/-6.0, p<0.0001). By multivariate analysis, DS>18 (OR 2.00, 95%CI, 1.20-3.32, p=0.008) and REOP (OR 2.40, 95%CI, 1.53-3.77, p<0.0001) were independently associated with COMP. Using propensity scores 82% of cases with DS>18 (n=289) were matched 1:1 to cases with DS18 (6.9% vs 2.8%, p=0.02), (16.6% vs 10.4%, p=0.03). Comparing cases with DS18 and primary CABG versus REOP, survival at 2 years was 92.1% versus 84.5% (p=0.001) and 92.7% versus 82.7% (p<0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Diffuse coronary artery disease is an important predictor of morbidity and mortality in primary and REOP CABG patients, and should be considered in both individual patient assessment and risk adjustment.     

Emergency myocardial revascularization for acute myocardial infarction: survival benefits of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass.

OBJECTIVE: Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with increased operative mortality. It has been suggested that this mortality might be reduced by performing the operation without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS: Between January 1992 and April 1998, 77 patients underwent emergency CABG within 48 h of AMI. Thirty seven were operated on with CPB, and 40 without CPB. The two groups were similar regarding age, gender, left-ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and preoperative use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP; 50%). The mean number of grafts/patient was 3 in the CPB group, and 1.9 in the No-CPB group (P<0.0001). RESULTS: Operative mortality in the CPB group was 24% (nine of 37) compared to 5% (two of 40) without CPB (P=0.015). Follow-up ranged between 6 and 66 months. There were no late deaths in the CPB group compared to nine (22%) in the No-CPB group (P<0.0066). Patients operated on with CPB had lower rates of recurrent angina (0 versus 15%; P=0.04) and re-interventions (0 versus 15%; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that CABG without CPB is the preferred method of myocardial revascularization, due to the fact that it carries lower mortality than CABG with CPB. The trade-off includes increased rates of recurrent angina, re-interventions and late mortality.     

术前置入主动脉内球囊反搏对高危冠状动脉旁路移植术患者预后的影响

目的比较高危冠心病患者术前预防性置入主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)和被动紧急置入IABP对临床预后的影响. 方法 35例接受冠状动脉旁路移植手术同时需接受IABP置入的患者,根据置入的时机不同分为两组.术前置入组 接受术前预防性置入IABP;对照组术中或术后接受紧急置入IABP.比较两组围术期死亡率、心肌梗死发生率、术后心功能不全和需要正性肌力药物辅助的程度、IABP使用的时间、术后呼吸机辅助时间和重症监护治疗病房(ICU)停留时间. 结果术前置入组围手术期死亡率和心肌梗死发生率分别为11.1%和0%,较对照组低(65.4%,50%;P＝0.007,0.013);两组呼吸机辅助通气时间、IABP使用时间、术后需正性肌力药物辅助时间以及术后平均住ICU时间差别均有显著性意义(P＜0.05). 结论术前预防性置入IABP能降低围术期死亡率、心肌梗死发生率,减少对正性肌力药物的需要量和缩短住ICU时间.     

Expansion of PCI at the Expense of Bypass Surgery Jeopardizes Protection against Premature Death

Prophylactic use of an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) prior to open-heart surgery in patients with impaired left ventricular function is still under debate. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &;lt; 40% were therefore compared according to time of IABP placement, viz. preoperative (n = 56), intraoperative (n = 40) or postoperative (n = 17), and also with patients who did not receive mechanical support despite LVEF &;lt; 40% (n = 78). The main indication for preoperative IABP insertion was severely impaired left ventricular function (80%), while patients with intraoperative or postoperative IABP placement mainly presented with low cardiac-output syndrome (70%/53%). Preoperative IABP was associated with a low mortality rate (8.9%), whereas patients with intraoperative or postoperative IABP placement had a high mortality risk and an increased catecholamine requirement. Of the patients scheduled for surgery without prophylactic IABP, 19% required intra- or postoperative insertion. Prophylactic placement of IABP thus reduced the mortality rate as well as the postoperative need for mechanical and catecholamine support. Need for intraoperative IABP insertion was associated with high mortality, whereas the outcome after postoperative IABP placement depended on the indication for the measure.     

Intraaortic balloon pump timing discrepancies in adult patients

The objective of this clinical study was to quantify the incidence and magnitude of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) inflation and deflation landmark discrepancies associated with the IABP catheter arterial pressure waveform. Cardiac surgery patients with an IABP inserted prior to surgery were recruited. Following cardiac exposure, a high-fidelity pressure catheter was inserted into the aortic root for digital recording. The radial artery pressure signal was simultaneously recorded from the patient monitor along with the arterial pressure and electrocardiogram waveforms from the IABP console while operating at 1:1 and 1:2 synchronization. In selected patients, recordings were obtained with the IABP timed to the high-fidelity aortic root waveform. In all 11 patients, inflation and deflation landmark delays were observed when comparing the aortic root waveforms to the IABP arterial pressure waveforms (inflation delay = 74 ± 29 [23-117] ms; deflation delay = 71 ± 37 [24-141] ms, mean ± standard deviation [min-max]). Delays were greater when compared to the radial artery waveform (inflation delay = 175 ± 50 [100-233] ms; deflation delay = 168 ± 52 [100-274] ms). In all cases, the landmark delays were statistically different from zero (P < 0.001). Diastolic augmentation and afterload reduction varied with waveform source. Conflicting indications of afterload reduction occurred in four patients. Timing to the aortic root waveform resulted in greater diastolic pressure augmentation and afterload reduction but mixed changes in stroke volume. Delay and distortion of the arterial waveform was consistently found when measured through the IABP catheter lumen. These delays can alter IABP efficacy and may be eliminated by using high-fidelity sensing of aortic pressure.     

Timing of intra-aortic balloon pump support and 1-year survival.

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between the timing of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support and surgical outcome remains a subject of debate. Peri-operative mechanical circulatory support is commenced either prophylactically or after increasing inotropic support has proved inadequate. This study evaluates the effect timing of IABP support on the 1-year survival of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: From April 1997 to September 2002, 7698 consecutive cardiac surgical procedures were performed. This included 5678 isolated coronary artery bypasses (CABGs), 1245 isolated valve procedures and 775 simultaneous CABG and valve procedures. IABP support was required in 237 patients (3.1%). Twenty-seven patients (0.35%) were classed as high-risk and received preoperative IABP support, 25 patients (0.32%) were haemodynamically compromised and required preoperative IABP support, 120 patients (1.56%) required intra-operative IABP support, and 65 patients (0.84%) required post-operative IABP support. Multiple variables were offered to a Cox proportional hazards model and significant predictors of 1-year survival were identified. These were used to risk adjust Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: 1-year follow-up was complete and 450 deaths (5.8%) were recorded. The significant independent predictors of increased mortality at 1-year (P<0.05, HR=hazard ratio) were post-operative renal failure (HR=3.5), increasing EuroSCORE (HR=1.2), post-operative myocardial infarction (HR=3.7), post-operative IABP (HR=4.1) intra-operative IABP (HR=2.8), post-operative stroke (HR=2.5), increasing number of valves (HR=1.6), ejection fraction <30% (HR=1.3) and triple-vessel disease (HR=1.3). After risk-adjustment, 1-year survival for patients who required intra-operative IABP support was significantly greater than for those patients who required IABP support in the post-operative period. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who warrant IABP support in the post-operative setting have a significantly increased mortality at 1-year when compared to any other group. Therefore, earlier IABP support as part of surgical strategy may help to improve the outcome.     

Role of Intra‐Aortic Balloon Pump and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Early Graft Failure After Cardiac Transplantation

Early graft failure (EGF) is a major risk factor for death after heart transplantation (Htx). We investigated the predictive risk factors for moderate‐to‐severe EGF requiring an intra‐aortic balloon pump (IABP) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circulatory support as treatment after Htx. Between January 2000 and December 2014, 412 consecutive adult patients underwent isolated Htx at our institution. Moderate and severe EGF were defined as the need for IABP and ECMO support, respectively, within 24 h after Htx. All available recipient and donor variables were analyzed to assess the risk of EGF occurrence. Overall, moderate‐to‐severe EGF occurred in 46 (11.1%) patients. Twenty‐nine (63.04%) patients required peripheral or central ECMO support in the treatment of severe EGF and 17 (36.9%) patients required IABP support for the treatment of moderate EGF. The predictive risk factors for moderate‐to‐severe EGF in recipients, as assessed by logistic regression analysis, were a preoperative transpulmonary gradient > 12 mm Hg (odds ratio [OR] 5.2; P = 0.023), a preoperative inotropic score > 10 (OR 8.5; P = 0.0001), and preoperative ECMO support (OR 4.2; P = 0.012). For donors, the predictive risk factor was a donor score ≥ 17 (OR 8.3; P = 0.006). The absence of EGF was correlated with improved long‐term survival: 94% at 1 year and 81% at 5 years without EGF versus 76% and 36% at 1 year (P < 0.001), and 70% and 28% at 5 years (P < 0.001) with EGF requiring IABP and ECMO support, respectively. In‐hospital weaned and survived patients after IABP or ECMO treatment for moderate‐to‐severe EGF had a similar 5‐year conditional survival rate as transplant patients who had not suffered EGF: 88% without EGF versus 84% with EGF treated with mechanical circulatory support devices (P = 0.08). The occurrence of EGF is a multifactorial deleterious event that depends on donor and recipient profiles. IABP and ECMO support are reliable treatment strategies, depending on the grade of EGF. Furthermore, surviving patients treated with IABP or ECMO have the same long‐term conditional survival rate as patients who have not suffered EGF.     

Preoperative intraaortic balloon pumps in high-risk patients undergoing open heart surgery

BACKGROUND: The use of the preoperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction or unstable angina with critical coronary anatomy is becoming more frequent as surgical casemix changes. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of preoperative IABP use on survival in high-risk patients having open heart surgery. METHODS: Prospectively collected data for 645 consecutive patients were reviewed. Patients receiving an IABP were identified and grouped as follows: group A (preoperative IABP for high-risk nonemergent cases), group B (preoperative IABP for emergent cases), and group C (intra/postoperative IABP). Risk-adjusted hospital mortality rates in these three groups was compared using the modified Parsonnet score for preoperative risk stratification. RESULTS: IABPs were used in 101 cases (16%). The predicted versus actual hospital mortality rate was 20% versus 5.7% in group A, 32.1% versus 47.6% in group B, and 12.6% versus 22.2% in group C (group A vs group B, p = 0.0014; group A vs group C, p = 0.012). IABP-related morbidity occurred in 3% of cases (all in group C). CONCLUSIONS: Risk-adjusted mortality was significantly lower in high-risk cases with preoperative IABPs compared with emergent cases and intraoperative/postoperative IABPs. We encourage the use of preoperative IABPs in selected high-risk patients.     

The effect and role of the intraaortic balloon pumping in off-pump coronary artery bypass

Eighty consecutive patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) were studied. They were divided into group I (n = 10) which received preoperative intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP), and group II (n = 70) which did not receive IABP. The indications for preoperative IABP were severe left main coronary artery disease in 7 patients, severe 3 vessel disease in 3 patients, unstable angina in 5 patients, acute myocardial infarction in 3 patients. There was no operative mortality in both groups. The average number of distal anastomosis 2.7/patients in group I and 3.3/patients in group II. There was no differences in ventilator support time, length of stay in the intensive care unit and morbidity between 2 groups. The average postoperative IABP support time was 5.4 hours. There was no IABP-related complication in group I. IABP was very effective to perform OPCAB surgery safety. Preoperative IABP may be effective modality to support OPCAB surgery not only in emergent case but also in elective case.     

Aggressive preoperative use of intraaortic balloon pump in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: The use of the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting has been traditionally associated with a high complication rate and adverse outcomes. However, recent reports show that many of these catastrophic outcomes can be avoided by preoperatively placing the IABP in high-risk patients. To further validate these reports, we defined a set of liberal criteria for preoperative IABP insertion and applied them to a series of elderly patients (70 years or older) undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Two hundred six consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass were retrospectively reviewed. A rapid recovery protocol emphasizing reduced cardiopulmonary bypass time, an anesthetic protocol for early extubation, perioperative administration of corticosteroids and thyroid hormone, and aggressive diuresis was applied to all patients. Patients who required an urgent operation because of failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, a critical left main stenosis (70% or greater), pronounced left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction 40% or less), or unstable angina refractory to medical therapy or who required an emergency reoperation received preoperative IABP support. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate for the entire group was 4.4%. There were 97 patients (47%) who received a preoperative IABP (group II) in comparison with 109 patients (53%) who did not fulfill the preoperative insertion criteria (group I). Patients in group II had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (mean, 46% versus 59%, p<0.001) and a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (35% versus 17%, p<0.01) and acute myocardial infarction (37% versus 17%, p<0.01) than patients in group I. The average postoperative hospital length of stay for patients in group II was slightly longer than for those in group I (9.0+/-10.5 versus 6.0+/-3.7 days, p<0.01). However, there were no statistically significant differences in complication or mortality rates between the two groups. Only 2 patients (2.2%) had complications related to IABP insertion. Lower extremity ischemia occurred in both patients, and both were treated successfully with thromboembolectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Liberal preoperative insertion of the IABP can be performed safely in high-risk elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, with results comparable to those in lower risk patients.