Comparison of ADA 1997 and WHO 1985 criteria for diabetes in south Indians--the Chennai Urban Population Study. American Diabetes Association.

AIMS: To compare the American Diabetes Association (ADA) fasting criteria and World Health Organization (WHO) 2-h criteria for diabetes in an urban south Indian population. METHODS: Subjects were drawn from the Chennai Urban Population Study. Of the 1001 subjects studied, 52 (5.2%) were diagnosed as having diabetes according to WHO 2-h criteria and 32 (3.2%) according to the ADA fasting criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-five (48%) of the subjects diagnosed with diabetes by the WHO 2-h criteria were not classified as having diabetes by the ADA fasting criteria. Similarly, of the 78 subjects (7.8%) classified as having impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), only eight (10.3%) had impaired fasting glucose (IFG) according to the ADA fasting criteria. The overall agreement between the WHO 2-h criteria and ADA fasting criteria was poor (kappa = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the ADA fasting criteria results in a lower prevalence rates of diabetes in this lean urban south Indian population.     

Criteria for previously undiagnosed diabetes and risk of mortality: 15-year follow-up of the Edinburgh Artery Study cohort.

AIMS: To compare risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality associated with different criteria for undiagnosed diabetes and glucose tolerance. METHODS: A population-based cohort of 758 men and 738 women of 55-74 years of age who had an oral glucose tolerance test or known diabetes at baseline were followed up until death or for 15 years. Mortality outcomes were compared by baseline diabetes status using people with normal glucose tolerance (i.e. those without diabetes, impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance) as the reference group. RESULTS: Prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes using World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (fasting glucose of > or = 7.0 mmol/l and/or a 2-h post-challenge glucose of > or = 11.1 mmol/l) was 6.6%, of which 81% was associated with fasting glucose > or = 7.0 mmol/l and 19% was associated with isolated post-challenge hyperglycaemia. Hazard ratios (95% CI) for all-cause mortality adjusted for age and sex were 1.51 (1.09-2.08) for new diabetes by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criterion (fasting glucose of > or = 7.0 mmol/l regardless of post-challenge glucose), 1.60 (1.20-2.13) for new diabetes by WHO criteria and 1.98 (1.14-3.44) for isolated post-challenge hyperglycaemia. Hazard ratios (95% CI) for cardiovascular mortality adjusted for age and sex were 1.89 (1.17-3.00), 1.73 (1.12-2.66) and 1.08 (0.34-3.40) for new diabetes by ADA and WHO criteria and for isolated post-challenge hyperglycaemia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Undiagnosed diabetes was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality by any criteria but significantly increased cardiovascular disease mortality was only associated with diabetes diagnosed using the fasting glucose criterion. Mortality risks were similar in this population using either ADA or WHO criteria for diagnosis of diabetes.     

Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate glucose abnormalities in obese patients based on ADA (1997) and WHO (1985) criteria.

AIM: To assess the accuracy of the 1997 ADA criteria for diagnosing diabetes mellitus and related glucose disturbances in comparison with the reference WHO 1985 criteria in obese subjects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 286 men and 881 women, 15-84 years of age, with obesity (body mass index (BMI) > or = 30 kg/m2), an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was carried out according to WHO standard. Patients were classified into three categories of glucose tolerance using WHO 1985 (Normal Glucose Tolerance (NGT), Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM)) and ADA (Normal Fasting Glucose (NFG), Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) and DM) criteria. Prevalence of each category was compared and agreement between the two classifications was assessed. The relation between fasting plasma glucose value and diabetes, as diagnosed by WHO 1985 criteria, was studied using various regression models, cumulative frequency curves, Finch method and ROC curve. RESULTS: Compared with WHO 1985, ADA criteria strongly underestimated the prevalence rate of diabetes (3.7% vs. 10.6%) and intermediate glucose abnormalities (6.0% vs. 22.4%). Agreement between the two classifications was poor (kappa = 0.23). Moreover, many patients defined as glucose-intolerant by the WHO 1985 criteria were shifted to a more favourable metabolic status by ADA criteria. Thus, ADA criteria failed to detect 69% of WHO diabetic patients and 89% with IGT were considered as normal. According to the method, cut-off value of fasting blood glucose for detecting WHO 1985-diagnosed diabetes varied widely, from 5.3 to 6.3 mmol/l and none was satisfactory because of poor sensitivity and positive predictive value. CONCLUSION: The ADA criteria do not appear to be a good substitute for those of the WHO 1985 at identifying diabetes and intermediate glucose abnormalities in an obese population. Since it appears impossible to determine a reliable cut-off value for fasting blood glucose to identify diabetic obese subjects with sufficient sensitivity, our results justify the retention of the OGTT in clinical practice or for epidemiological studies.     

Undiagnosed diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in adult Ghanaians using the ADA and WHO diagnostic criteria

Fasting glucose and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) criteria for glucose homeostasis were compared in a cross-sectional cluster, community study in Accra, Ghana. A total of 4636 subjects without prior diagnosis of diabetes had fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour OGTT and measurement of cardiovascular risk factors. Mean age of subjects was 44.2 years; 39.1% of subjects were males. The overall prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes ascertained with both criteria was 4.5% (n=209). The prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes by fasting (3,2%) and OGTT (3.1%) criteria were similar (p>0.05). The prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (15.8%) was higher than that of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) (10.7%). Only 56.5% (n=83) of subjects with diabetes by fasting criteria also had diabetes by OGTT criteria. Sixty-two subjects (42.8%) with diabetes by OGTT had normal or impaired fasting glucose. There was poor agreement between the two diagnostic criteria (kappa=0.31). The concordant normoglycaemic group was the youngest and had the lowest body-mass indey (BMI), waist girth, waist-hip ratio (WHR), total cholesterol, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The concordant diabetic group, in contrast, had the highest BMI, waist girth, WHR, total cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Both systems gave similar undiagnosed diabetes rates bur dissimilar IFG and IGT rates. There was poor agreement between the two diagnostic criteria. Diagnostic criteria influenced cardiovascular risk factors. A case may be made for using both criteria in order to ascertain all “diabetes” and all “at-risk” subjects. Received: 4 January 2001 / Accepted in revised form: 18 January 2002     

Comparison of WHO and ADA criteria for diagnosis of glucose status in adults

The aim was to compare the 1997 American Diabetes Association (ADA) and 1985 and 1998 World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) by ethnicity and cardiovascular risk factors. We analysed the oral glucose tolerance tests carried out in a cross-sectional survey of 5816 New Zealand workers aged 22-78 years (4211 men, 1605 women) carried out between 1988 and 1990. Prevalence of diabetes was similar using ADA (3.1%) compared with the 1998 WHO criteria (3.0%). The overall prevalence rate of diabetes using the 1985 WHO criteria was only 1.5%. The prevalence rate of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) was the lowest in Europeans (7.3%) and highest in Asians (15.0%). The overall weighted kappa for agreement between the 1997 ADA and 1998 WHO criteria was moderate (0.59), but varied between ethnic groups. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors were approximately more adverse across groups with IFG, normal (ADA)/IGT (WHO), IFG/IGT and diabetes compared with normal subjects. Compared to those with IFG, participants with the normal (ADA)/IGT (WHO) criteria differed in fasting and 2-h glucose, diastolic blood pressure, and urinary albumin levels, and the proportions of males and number with hypertension, but had a significantly adverse pattern of CVD risk factors compared to those with normal glycaemia. The 1988 WHO criteria using the OGTT provides additional information for classifying various categories of glucose intolerance that is not captured using the 1997 ADA fasting glucose criteria alone.     

The prevalence of diabetes, association with cardiovascular risk factors and implications of diagnostic criteria (ADA 1997 and WHO 1998) in a 1996 community-based population study in Hong Kong Chinese. Hong Kong Cardiovascular Risk Factor Steering Committee. American Diabetes Association.

AIMS: While the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 1997 diagnostic criteria advocate the use of fasting plasma glucose only, the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria retain the use of the standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The present study evaluated the relative merit of the respective diagnostic criteria in Chinese. METHODS: Data collected for the Hong Kong Cardiovascular Risk Factor Prevalence Study was analysed. This was a representative population-based study, conducted from 1995 to 1996 among 2,900 Chinese subjects aged 25-74 years using a 75-g OGTT. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes (known plus unknown) was 6.2% (95% confidence interval 5.3-7.1%), 9.2% (8.1-10.3%), and 9.8% (8.7-10.9%) based on ADA 1997, WHO 1985 and WHO 1998 criteria, respectively, with a very high prevalence in older subjects. The 2,451 subjects classified as normal under ADA 1997 criteria were heterogenous: 15.3% had impaired glucose tolerance; 2.1% had diabetes under WHO 1998 criteria. These latter two smaller groups had cardiovascular risk profiles comparable to that found among the impaired fasting glucose subjects (under ADA), but worse than that among the concordant normal glucose tolerance subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The ADA criteria underestimate both diabetes prevalence and cardiovascular risk in this population. Hence fasting glucose alone is an inadequate approach and OGTT should be retained to identify at-risk individuals in both clinical diagnosis and epidemiological studies.     

Diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance: 1997 criteria by the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (ADA), 1998 WHO consultation criteria, and 1985 WHO criteria. World Health Organization.

To compare 1997 ADA diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance/1998 WHO Consultation criteria versus 1985 WHO criteria, we analyzed data from a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) performed on 1051 high-risk subjects without medical history of diabetes at Diabetes Screening Clinic, Ramathibodi Hospital, Thailand. There were 372 males and 679 females, aged (mean +/- S.D.) = 50.3 +/- 12.55 years, BMI = 25.62 +/- 4.39 kg/m2. If fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was used as recently recommended then 54.1, 20.4, and 25.5% of cases were classified as normal, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), and diabetic, respectively. In diagnosing diabetes using a full OGTT based on the 1985 WHO criteria as the reference test, FPG > or = 7 mmol/l had a sensitivity of 57.7%, specificity of 97.4%, positive predictive value of 94.0%, and negative predictive value of 76.4%; 53.7% of subjects with IFG had 2-h plasma glucose > or = 11.1 mmol/l. The 1997 ADA/1998 WHO Consultation criteria and 1985 WHO criteria for a full OGTT yield similar overall results. FPG ( > or = 7 mmol/l) was not sensitive for diagnosing diabetes. Moreover, about half of the subjects with IFG were actually diabetic. Therefore, OGTT remains a valuable test in diagnosing diabetes and classifying various categories of glucose intolerance.     

Concordance between fasting and 2-h post-glucose challenge criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and glucose intolerance in high risk individuals.

AIMS: To compare the new fasting with the 2-h post glucose challenge diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus in a high-risk Central European population. METHODS: The results of the 75-g oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) performed between 1st January 1990 and 31st December 1998 in patients at high risk of glucose metabolism disturbance were analysed. RESULTS: From 1554 patients with OGTT results available for the study, 1360 (759 women and 601 men, aged 65.5+/-6.9 years, body mass index 28.2 +/- 4.5 kg/m2) were included into the study. With the use of the post-challenge criteria, 41.3% of the analysed population had diabetes or impaired diabetes tolerance (IGT), whereas with the new fasting system only 16.6% would have been diagnosed with any type of glucose intolerance. Diabetes was significantly more often diagnosed with the post-challenge criteria than with the fasting ones: 16.2 vs. 5.3% (P < 0.0001). The subjects with diabetes diagnosed upon fasting glucose value were significantly younger than the subjects with diabetes diagnosed according to the 2-h glucose challenge: 65.7 +/- 6.2 vs. 68.8 +/- 7.0 years, respectively (P < 0.01). The sensitivity of the new criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes was 18.2%, and specificity 97.2%. A total of 77.8% of IGT cases would have been diagnosed as having normal glucose metabolism according to the fasting glucose. The sensitivity of the new criteria for the diagnosis of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT or impaired fasting glucose) was 14.6%, and specificity 89.8%. The overall kappa statistic (k) was low; 0.211 (95% confidence interval 0.149-0.27). CONCLUSIONS: The new lower fasting criteria might be too insensitive to identify a large proportion of individuals with diabetes or impaired glucose intolerance, particularly in a high-risk population.     

Post-partum reclassification of glucose tolerance in women previously diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: To re-evaluate post-partum screening; fasting plasma glucose (FPG) vs. oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in Caucasian women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: Once breast-feeding had finished, an OGTT was performed in 120 women with previous GDM. They were classified according to World Health Organization (WHO) 1985 and American Diabetes Association (ADA) 1997 criteria. The kappa-statistic measure of agreement was used to compared both diagnostic categories. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve studied the FPG as a test to detect abnormal glucose tolerance. RESULTS: Identical diabetes prevalence (2%) but quite different intermediate categories (12% impaired glucose tolerance vs. 3% impaired fasting glucose) were observed with both criteria. The kappa-statistic (scaled from 0 to 1) was 0.38 (fair agreement), P = 0.000. The ROC curve area of the FPG was 0.65. CONCLUSIONS: FPG is an unsatisfactory method of evaluating the glucose tolerance of Caucasian women with previous GDM. OGTT may be a better test for such a purpose.     

Impact of the American Diabetes Association diagnosis criteria on high-risk Spanish population. IGT Research Group. Impaired glucose tolerance

To research into the impact of the new American Diabetes Association (ADA) diagnostic criteria on high risk Spanish population, two cross-sectional studies involving seven primary health care centers in Catalonia (Spain) were revised. Individuals aged > 40 years with any major risk factor for diabetes were screened according to the World Health Organization (WHO) rules using a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test to measure fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2 h plasma glucose. The changes on diabetes prevalence and on epidemiological characteristics were evaluated applying the ADA criteria on the basis of FPG alone. A total of 970 individuals, 453 males (46.7%), mean age 59 years and mean body mass index (BMI) 30.6 kg/m2 were screened. Among the 459 diabetic subjects according to either the WHO or the ADA criteria, 314 (68.4%) were classified as having diabetes with respect to both sets of criteria (WHO and ADA). The overlap between impaired glucose tolerance (WHO) and impaired fasting glucose (ADA) diagnoses was 20.7%. Using the ADA criteria results in a decrease of the prevalence of diabetes by 1.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) = -2.2 to -0.8%). No changes in the diabetic phenotype (age, sex and BMI) were found. Impaired fasting glucose prevalence was 18.4% (95% CI = 16-21%). Overall concordance in terms of crude and weighted kappa-value was only acceptable (kappa = 0.51 and kappa = 0.61, respectively). To apply the new ADA diagnostic criteria on high risk Spanish population evidenced a decrease on diabetes prevalence. Nevertheless, the change of criteria undervalued the risk of postprandial hyperglycaemia related to impaired glucose tolerance.     

WHO and ADA criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in relation to body mass index. Insulin sensitivity and secretion in resulting subcategories of glucose tolerance.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of body mass index (BMI) on agreement between the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the new World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and to investigate the metabolic profile of the resulting subcategories. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study SUBJECTS: A total of 3018 subjects with no previous history of diabetes and fasting glucose <7.8 mmol/l, with a wide range of BMIs. MEASUREMENTS: (1) Prevalence of impaired glucose regulation (IGR) and diabetes (DM) according to ADA and WHO diagnostic criteria; (2) basal and post-load insulin sensitivity and secretion, calculated on the basis of data derived from an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). RESULTS: The diagnosis according to the two classifications was concordant in 2490 subjects, discordant in 528 (452 were identified as impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and 76 as DM only by means of OGTT). The disagreement increased with increasing BMI, being as high as 25.3% in subjects with BMI > or = 35 kg/m(2). Subjects with isolated fasting hyperglycaemia were mainly characterised by reduced insulin sensitivity and secretion in the basal state, but normal first-phase insulin secretion and moderately reduced insulin sensitivity after glucose challenge. Subjects with isolated 2 h hyperglycaemia were mainly characterised by normal basal insulin secretion and by a marked insulin resistance associated with a blunted first-phase insulin secretion after the glucose load. CONCLUSIONS: The disagreement between ADA and WHO classifications is particularly relevant in obesity, making OGTT mandatory in these subjects. Different pathogenic mechanisms are involved in isolated fasting or post-load hyperglycaemia, possibly related to a different site of insulin resistance (hepatic vs peripheral), and/or to a different disregulation of insulin secretion (basal vs post-load). A correct identification of the underlying mechanism(s) is the rationale for future studies to detect the effectiveness of different pharmacological or behavioural approaches.     

Prevalence of abnormalities of glucose metabolism in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

Patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) present a higher risk for abnormalities of glucose metabolism (AGM). For to study this in our population, we submitted 85 patients, with body mass index (BMI) of 28.5 +/- 6.6 kg/m(2) and aged 25.5 +/- 5.4 years old, to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and assessed the impact of BMI on the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and of diabetes mellitus (DM). The states of glucose tolerance were classified considering fasting plasma glucose (FPG) according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criterion and plasma glucose at 120 minutes according to the Word Health Organization (WHO) criterion. According to the ADA criteria, 83.5% classified as normal and 16.5% as with AGM, with 15.3% presenting impaired fasting glucose and 1.2% DM, while according to the WHO criteria, 68.2% were classified as normal and 31.8% as with AGM, with 27.0% of them presenting IGT and 4.8% DM. Seventy-three percent of PCOS patients with IGT by WHO criterion had normal FPG by ADA criterion. The prevalence of AGM for both criteria increased with the body mass index. In conclusion, we found a higher prevalence of AGM in PCOS patients than that found in the general population, being the highest in obese patients. Glycemia at 120 minutes on the OGTT identified more patients with AGM than fasting glycemia. We recommended that the assessment of AGM must be done by the OGTT in all patients with PCOS.     

Reproducibility of diabetes mellitus diagnosis (WHO 1999 criteria) in women

Abstract. Reproducibility of diabetes mellitus (DM) diagnosis has been recognized as non-optimal and a few studies have analyzed its reproducibility using new diagnostic criteria. Our aim was to evaluate the reproducibility of WHO 1999 criteria for DM diagnosis in women. A total of 696 caucasian women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) underwent an OGTT at a median of 6.2 years (interquartile range, 0.5–7.3) after delivery. When OGTT was diagnostic of DM, a second test was scheduled and performed after a median of 3 months (interquartile range, 1.6–10.6). At the second test, 35 women were diagnosed with DM (12 by fasting plasma glucose (FPG) alone, 10 by isolated post-challenge hyperglycemia (IPH), 10 by fasting and 2-h plasma glucose, 3 by symptoms of hyperglycemia plus measurement of plasma glucose). DM was confirmed in 56.3% of women diagnosed without symptoms. In this subgroup, reproducibility according to the abnormality at the first test was: 33.3% in those diagnosed by FPG alone, 40% in those diagnosed by IPH, and 100% in those diagnosed by both fasting and 2-h plasma glucose (p<0.05 vs. the two previous groups). In women with former GDM, the reproducibility of DM diagnosis by FPG alone or IPH is similar and lower than the diagnosis made by abnormality in both values.     

Impact of the new American Diabetes Association and World Health Organisation diagnostic criteria for diabetes on subjects from three ethnic groups living in the UK

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends basing diabetes diagnosis on a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) of > or = 7.0 mmol/L and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) on 6.1 < or = FPG < 7.0 mmol/L. The new World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendations also adopt this FPG cut-off, but retain the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) where possible and the intermediate group of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in addition to IFG. We compare the effect of the new ADA and WHO diagnostic criteria in three ethnic groups. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty whites, 340 South Asians and 347 subjects of African descent, aged 40-59 years and not known to have diabetes, were identified through South London general practices. Inevitably, the prevalence of new diabetes was lower under ADA than under WHO criteria (including post-load levels) for all three groups, falling from 5.7% overall to 3.3% (fall 2.4% 95% CI 1.6% to 3.6%). The largest fall was for South Asians from 9.1% to 5.0% (fall 4.1% 95% CI 2.2% to 6.8%). The prevalence of impaired glucose homeostasis under ADA criteria (IFG) was substantially less than under WHO criteria (IFG + IGT). Under WHO criteria, including a glucose tolerance test, there was marked variation by ethnic group in diabetes prevalence (p < 0.001) and IGT (p < 0.0001), both were most prevalent amongst South Asians. Under ADA criteria, (or new WHO criteria without OGTT) diabetes prevalence still differed significantly between groups (p < 0.01), but there was no difference in IFG prevalence (p = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with IGT but normal FPG are at greater risk of coronary heart disease. The new ADA definition fails to identify substantial numbers of such subjects, particularly among South Asians. Our study supports the retention of the OGTT in the new WHO criteria, particularly for South Asians.     

Application of the new ADA criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes to population studies in sub-Saharan Africa. American diabetes association.

AIMS: To examine the implications for epidemiological studies of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommendation that the fasting blood glucose at a lowered level becomes the main diagnostic test for diabetes on cross-sectional-based data from sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: Data from 11 surveys conducted in rural, peri-urban and urban Cameroon (n = 1804), South Africa (n = 3799) and Tanzania (n = 10013) which measured fasting (ADA criteria) and 2-h blood glucose concentrations during a standard 75 g OGTT (old WHO criteria) were analysed. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes was higher in eight of the 11 surveys when applying the new ADA compared to the old WHO criteria. With the exception of one population (Mara, Tanzania) the absolute difference in prevalence between the two classifications tended to be small (< 2%). There was considerable variation in the categorization of individuals using the ADA and old WHO criteria. The level of agreement between the two ranged from fair to good (Kappa statistic 0.17-0.86). The prevalence of impaired fasting glycaemia (IFG) was lower than that of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in 10 of the surveys and the agreement between the two was fair, < or = 0.26 in all the surveys. CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of the new ADA fasting criteria for prevalence surveys is an attractive and practical option, particularly in Africa, further information is required on the characteristics and prognosis of individuals classified as IFG or diabetic by the fasting criteria, prior to wide adoption of the ADA criteria. Ideally measurement of both fasting and two low glucose concentrations should remain the standard for epidemiological studies.     

Comparison of the results between two diagnostic criteria by ADA and WHO among subjects with FPG 5.6-7.8 mmol/l in Kin-Hu and Kin-Chen, Kinmen, 1991-94.

The objective of this study was to compare the results between two diagnostic criteria by ADA (1997) and WHO (1985) among those with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level 5.6-7.8 mmol/l from a community-based survey in Kin-Hu and Kin-Chen, Kinmen conducted in 1991-94. According to official household registry, 10,797 residents aged over 30 were eligible for screening. 7580 had completed FPG screening and 1855 with FPG 5.6-7.8 mmol/l were invited to receive a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). 78.5% (1456/1855) had completed OGTT. The prevalence of impaired fasting glucose (IFG, by ADA) was 15.7%; the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT, by WHO) was 22.7%; the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes was 7.4% by ADA criteria and 10.9% by WHO criteria. It should be noticed that, among subjects with FPG 5.6-7.8 mmol/l, 50.3% of individuals with undiagnosed diabetes and 67.6% of individuals with IGT by WHO criteria would be missed by ADA criteria. Based on the above findings, the two-step screening strategy using FPG as the first line screening and OGTT for high-risk group (FPG 5.6-7.8 mmol/l) only was recommended in epidemiological study and case finding in consideration of feasibility and validity.     

Strategies for early detection of the risk of type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes in 1st degree relatives of patients with this disease

The present study included two groups of subjects: I. the adult offspring of parents with conjugal type 2 diabetes (n = 77; age range 18-59 yrs and mean age 38 +/- 0.8 yrs; BMI range 18.9-40.3 kg/m2 and mean value 26.6 +/- 0.6 kg/m2); and II. the adult offspring having one parent with type 2 diabetes: either father (n = 83-53%) or mother (n = 74-47%). The age range of the latter group was 21-64 yrs, mean age 41 +/- 0.8 yrs; BMI range was 17.6-46.4 kg/m2, and mean value 26.8 +/- 0.4 kg/m2. The normal glucose tolerance of the "healthy" parent was verified with the OGGT evaluated by the WHO and ADA criteria. In all offspring the same test (75 g) was performed, and glucose in venous blood and insulin (IRI) in serum were determined on fasting and at 30, 60 and 120 min of the test. In fasting state the levels of serum lipids (triglycerides, total and LDL and HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein AI and B) were also measured. In the group I unknown diabetes mellitus was discovered in 4 cases (4%): in 3 according to the WHO/ADA criteria and in one case evaluated by the ADA criteria), in 19 subjects (25%) IGT was found in 16 isolated and in 3 associated with isolated fasting glycaemia (IFG), and only in one case (1%) the isolated IFG was ascertained. In the group II diabetes was discovered according to the ADA criteria in 4 persons (2.5%), IGT in 29 subjects (18.5%), of whom 8 had also IFG. In this subgroup 16 subjects had diabetic father and 13 diabetic mother. The isolated IFG had 7 offspring (4.4%), of whom 2 had diabetic father and 5 diabetic mother. Apart from glycaemia, other parameters didn't disclose difference between the offspring of diabetic father and diabetic mother. However, considering these parameters together for the whole group II, it was found that the offspring with IGT, isolated and associated with IFG, differed from the remaining ones with significantly higher BMI, higher systolic blood pressure, higher 2-h serum IRI, and higher levels of serum triglycerides, total cholesterol and ApoB. CONCLUSION: Measurement of isolated fasting glycaemia and its interpretation by the ADA criteria is inadequate in studies aiming at early detection of glucose intolerance in subjects with familial increased risk of type 2 diabetes and should include also the determination of the 2-h glycemia of the OGTT evaluated according to the WHO criteria. On the other hand, the determination of fasting glycaemia and its evaluation by the ADA criteria is a valuable in diabetes screening, as its elevated level may identify other metabolic disorders associated with diabetes, and unfavorable risk of cardiovascular complications of this disease.     

Prevalence of type II diabetes mellitus in population of Krakow

The study was carried out within a framework of the Polish Multicenter Study on Diabetes Epidemiology in 1998-2000. The aim of the study was to define the prevalence of type 2 diabetes, especially unknown diabetes, and prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance in a demographically well-defined urban population using the comparable epidemiological methods which were applied in the previous study in Wroc?aw in 1985-1986. The study was carried out in 200,000 subjects inhabiting the town quarter. Out of those who were 35 or more 6000 subjects were randomised using a table of random numbers. All randomized subjects received a letter of invitation explaining the sense of study, its objectives and methods. If necessary the invitations were renewed, and then the subjects were contacted by phone. Each responding person received a questionnaire to complete. Then anthropometric and blood pressure measurements were taken. Blood was sampled for plasma glucose, insulin, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides in the fasting state. Those who declared being non-diabetic and in whom screening test using a glucometer (Glucotrend) revealed fasting glycemia below 8 mmol/l underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (75 g) to determine glycemia and insulinemia at 120 min. Plasma glucose, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides concentrations were measured with an enzymatic method, whereas insulinemia was defined with the IRMA technique, using ready kits Swierk-Poland. Diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance were recognised according to the 1985 WHO criteria. Chi square test, Fisher's test and Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was carried out using the statistical package BMDP. During 3 years of the study out of 6000 randomly selected subjects 3060 (1731 women and 1329 men) responded. In the study population 192 patients were with known diabetes, including 150 subjects receiving oral antidiabetic agents or insulin at the time of the study or some with high fasting glycemia not receiving any treatment except a diet. The 42 subjects who prior to the study had not been receiving hypoglycemic agents or in whom fasting glycemia had been below 8 mmol/l underwent an oral glucose tolerance test. Of them diabetes was confirmed in 11 patients, impaired glucose tolerance was observed in 9, and glucose intolerance was excluded in 22 subjects. Thus, in the study group 161 subjects (75 women and 86 men) with a mean age 61.5 +/- 8.95 years had already diabetes. Their mean BMI was 31.5 +/- 4.6 kg/m2 and did not differ significantly between both sexes. Only HDL cholesterol was significantly higher in men (women 1.1 +/- 0.3 vs. men 1.3 +/- 0.3, p < 0.001) in this group. Among those who declared being non-diabetic 160 subjects (77 men and 83 women), mean age 58.0 +/- 9.7 years and mean BMI 31.4 +/- 4.9 kg/m2 had diabetes identified according to the 1985 WHO criteria. Fasting insulinemia was 16.6 +/- 12.0 uj/ml in this group. At 120 min OGTT insulinemia in women was higher than in men (152.6 +/- 90.5 vs. 112.0 +/- 83.4, p < 0.01). In the whole study population diabetes was found in 321 subjects, including 161 with known and 160 with newly diagnosed diabetes. Based upon these data a standardized prevalence rate due to type 2 diabetes was calculated being 5.37% for the whole population (2.82% for known and 2.55% for unknown diabetes, respectively). When only part of the population over 35 years of age was taken into consideration, the rate was 10.77% (5.66% for known and 5.11% for unknown diabetes). When only fasting glycemia according to ADA recommendation was analysed, diabetes was recognised in 160 subjects (107 men and 53 women). In 78 subjects (49 men and 29 women) diabetes was diagnosed according to the WHO and ADA criteria. When oral glucose tolerance test and glycemia at 120 min exceeding 11.1 mmo/l is considered a gold standard for the diagnosis of diabetes, the diagnostic accuracy of the ADA criteria is 48.7%. In the study population 449 (14.55%) subjects (201 men and 248 women), mean age 56.6 +/- 9.6 years and mean BMI 29.7 +/- 4.6 (men 29.0 +/- 3.7 vs. women 30.2 +/- 5.2, p < 0.01) had impaired glucose tolerance. In our study population there were 572 subjects (329 men and 243 women) with impaired fasting glucose. Of them 359 subjects (212 men and 147 women) had normal glucose tolerance in OGTT, 161 (99 men and 62 women) had impaired glucose tolerance, and 52 (18 men and 62 women) type 2 diabetes. Thus, of the 572 subjects 9% (5.4% of men and 13% of women) had diabetes type 2, and 28% (30% of men and 25% of women) had impaired glucose tolerance. As the frequency of impaired glucose tolerance in this subgroup is higher than in the whole study population it seems justified to identify a group of subjects with increased fasting glycemia and to administer OGTT. CONCLUSIONS: 1. A significant rise in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes was observed between 1986 and 2000 (from 3.7% to 10.77%). 2. Prevalence of unknown diabetes increased considerably (reaching 5.11%). 3. The similar rise in the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance was observed between 1986 and 2000 (from 2.9% to 14.5%) 4. Early detection of type 2 diabetes should be based upon oral glucose tolerance test according to the WHO.     

Prevalence and determinants of diabetes mellitus and glucose intolerance in a Canarian Caucasian population - comparison of the 1997 ADA and the 1985 WHO criteria. The Guía Study.

AIMS: To estimate the prevalence of diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance in a Canarian population according to the 1997 ADA and the 1985 WHO criteria; and to study the cardiovascular risk factors associated with these categories. METHODS: A total of 691 subjects over 30 years old were chosen in a random sampling of the population (stratified by age and sex). An oral glucose tolerance test was performed (excluding known diabetic patients) and lipids were determined in the fasting state. Anthropometric and blood pressure measurements were performed, and history of smoking habits and medications was recorded. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes was 15.9% (1997 ADA) and 18.7% (1985 WHO); the prevalence of impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance was 8.8 and 17.1%, respectively. The age-adjusted prevalence of diabetes (Segi's standard world population) for the population aged 30-64 years was 12.4% (1985 WHO). The risk factors significantly associated with diabetes (1997 ADA and 1985 WHO) were age, body mass index; waist-to-hip ratio, systolic and mean blood pressure, triglycerides, total cholesterol and low HDL-cholesterol. Age, body mass index and systolic blood pressure were associated with impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance; triglycerides were also associated with impaired fasting glucose. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and glucose intolerance in Guía is one of the highest among studied Caucasian populations. The new 1997 ADA criteria estimate a lower prevalence of diabetes. Impaired fasting glucose also had a lower prevalence than impaired glucose intolerance and the overlap of these categories was modest.     

Diagnostic value of fasting capillary glucose,fructosamine and glycosylated haemoglobin in detecting diabetes and other glucose tolerance abnormalities compared to oral glucose tolerance test

New diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus recommend lowering of the fasting plasma glucose to 7.0 mmol/l. In contrast to recommendations of the American Diabetes Association (AA). WHO recommends using the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in clinical practice. In this study, based on OGTT results and WHO 1998 criteria, we determined if measuring fasting capillary glycaemia (FCG) along with fructosamine and/or glycosylated haemoglobin allows the detection of glucose tolerance abnormalities better than FCG alone. OGTT was performed in 538 patients. Serum fructosamine was determined in 480 of the patients, and glycosylated haemoglobin in 234 of the patients. According to WHO 1998 criteria, the patients were divided into groups due to glucose tolerance abnormalities. Fructosamine correlated stronger with 2-h post-load glucose concentrations than with FCG. HbA1c correlated stronger with FCG than with 2-h post-load glucose. Combined use of fructosamine and FCG predicted 2-h post-load glucose better than combined use of FCG and HbA1c. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that FCG was the best criterion in discriminating diabetes. Combined use of FCG and fructosamine slightly improved the ability to discriminate glucose tolerance abnormalities from normal glucose tolerance. FCG is the most effective predictor of 2-h post-load glucose and the best criterion for discriminating diabetes and other glucose tolerance abnormalities from normal glucose tolerance. Fructosamine is a potentially useful post-load glycaemia index. OGTT is irreplaceable in identification of patients with high post-load glycaemia. Received: 14 March 2001 / Accepted in revised form: 19 December 2001