Acetylcholine receptors loss and postsynaptic damage in MuSK antibody-positive myasthenia gravis

Muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibodies are found in some patients with "seronegative" myasthenia gravis (MG), but how they cause myasthenic symptoms is not clear. We visualized acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) and complement component 3 (C3) in muscle biopsies from 10 Japanese MG patients with MuSK antibodies, compared with 42 with AChR antibodies. The AChR density was not significantly decreased in MuSK antibody (Ab)-positive end-plates compared with AChR antibody-positive end-plates, and C3 was detected in only two of eight MuSK Ab-positive patients. MuSK antibodies do not appear to cause substantial AChR loss, complement deposition, or morphological damage. Effects on MuSK function need to be explored.     

Frequency of seronegativity in adult-acquired generalized myasthenia gravis

We determined the prevalence of muscle acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies in patients with adult-acquired generalized myasthenia gravis (MG), the seroconversion rate at 12 months, and the prevalence of muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibody among persistently seronegative patients. We identified 562 consecutive Mayo Clinic patients with MG based on clinical and electrophysiological criteria. At presentation, 508 patients (90.4%) tested positive for AChR binding or AChR modulating antibodies. After 12 months, 15.2% of initially seronegative patients had become seropositive, yielding a seronegativity rate of 8.2% (95% confidence interval: 6.2-9.6%). Among seronegative patients not receiving immunosuppressants, 38% were MuSK antibody-positive and 43% were seropositive for nonmuscle autoantibodies. Classification as seronegative MG should be reserved for nonimmunosuppressed patients with generalized MG who lack muscle AChR binding, AChR modulating, or MuSK antibodies at presentation and at follow-up of at least 12 months.     

Neurophysiological and mitochondrial abnormalities in MuSK antibody seropositive myasthenia gravis compared to other immunological subtypes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the electrophysiological and histopathological features of immunological myasthenia gravis (MG) subtypes. METHODS: Fifty MG patients underwent clinical examination, MuSK-Ab and AChR-Ab analysis. The majority underwent quantitative and single-fiber electromyography (QEMG, SFEMG), repetitive nerve stimulation and deltoid muscle biopsy. From muscle specimens with histological mitochondrial dysfunction, we amplified mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). In specimens with mtDNA deletions, the nuclear gene POLG1 was sequenced. RESULTS: Five AChR-Ab seropositive [AChR(+)] and 5 seronegative [AChR(-)] patients were MuSK-Ab seropositive [MuSK(+)]. Five of 7 neurophysiologically examined MuSK(+) patients (71%) had proximal myopathic pattern, compared to 7 of 31 MuSK(-)/AChR(+) patients (23%) (P=0.012). SFEMG was abnormal in all examined MuSK(+) patients. All 7 biopsied MuSK(+) and 32 MuSK(-) patients (89%) had cytochrome c oxidase (COX) negative fibers. Three of five MuSK(+) and 13 of 20 MuSK(-) patients analyzed had multiple mtDNA deletions but no POLG1 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Similar degree of SFEMG abnormalities was present in proximal muscles among MuSK(+) and AChR(+) patients. Proximal myopathy was over-represented in MuSK(+) patients; however, both MuSK(+) and MuSK(-) patients had mild myopathy with frequent mitochondrial abnormalities. SIGNIFICANCE: The weakness in MuSK(+) patients is most likely due to disturbed neuromuscular transmission. The frequently encountered mitochondrial dysfunction in MG warrants further study.     

Electrophysiological profile of the patients with MuSK positive myasthenia gravis

Abstract

Objectives:

To determine the electrophysiological profile of our cohort of patients with muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) positive myasthenia gravis (MG).

Methods:

Repetitive nerve stimulation test (RNS) and jitter analysis using concentric needle electrode were performed in 31 MuSK and in 28 acetylcholine receptor (AChR) positive MG patients.

Results:

Pathological RNS was verified in 16 (51·6%) MuSK and 26 (92·9%) AChR MG patients (P < 0·01). Pathological jitter analysis was registered in 28 (90·3%) MuSK and 26 (92·9%) AChR MG patients (P > 0·05). Increased jitter was present in extensor digitorum communis (EDC) in 23 (74·2%) MuSK and in 25 (89·3%) AChR MG patients (P > 0·05) as well as in orbicularis oculi (OO) muscle in 24 (85·7%) MuSK and 22 (81·5%) AChR MG patients (P > 0·05). Lower mean value of mean consecutive difference (MCD) and fewer potential pairs with increased jitter were registered in MuSK MG compared to AChR MG patients only in EDC muscle (P < 0·05). In MuSK MG patients, increased jitter was observed to be more frequent in patients with longer disease duration (P < 0·05) and also in those patients exhibiting more severe disease forms (P < 0·01) only in EDC muscle.

Discussion:

Repetitive nerve stimulation test has low sensitivity in MuSK MG patients, while jitter analysis shows high sensitivity, especially in facial muscles. The EDC muscle in MuSK MG patients usually shows increased jitter in more severe disease forms and later in the course of the disease.     

Seronegative myasthenia gravis

Some myasthenia gravis (MG) patients do not have detectable acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies and have been termed "seronegative" (SNMG) in many previous studies. A high proportion of patients with purely ocular symptoms, ocular MG, are seronegative; this may be because the sensitivity of the assay is insufficient to detect low levels of circulating AChR antibodies and because of intrinsic differences in the ocular muscles that make them more susceptible to circulating factors. Seronegative generalized myasthenia is proving to be heterogeneous both clinically and immunologically. Plasma from SNMG patients often contains a factor, probably an immunoglobulin M antibody, that alters AChR function in in vitro assays, but its target is not yet clear. A variable proportion of SNMG patients have antibodies to the muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK). These antibodies are directed against the extracellular domain of MuSK and inhibit agrin-induced AChR clustering in muscle myotubes. Although the role of these antibodies in causing myasthenic symptoms in vivo has not been elucidated, MuSK antibodies appear to define a group of patients who are often female with bulbar weakness, contrasting with MuSK antibody-negative SNMG patients who are more likely to have generalized weakness. MuSK antibody-positive patients may also differ in the distribution of their electrophysiological abnormalities and their responses to treatments.     

Myopathic changes detected by quantitative electromyography in patients with MuSK and AChR positive myasthenia gravis

Myopathic changes are frequent a electrophysiological finding in patients with muscle specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) positive myasthenia gravis (MG). The aim of this study was to explore the importance of quantitative electromyography (EMG) in the detection of myopathic changes in MuSK MG patients. Classical and quantitative EMG were performed in 31 MuSK and 28 acetylcholine receptor (AChR) positive MG patients, matched by sex, age, disease duration and severity. Classical EMG revealed the presence of myopathic changes more frequently in MuSK MG compared to AChR MG patients, especially in the facial muscles. Quantitative EMG registered myopathic lesions more frequently than classical EMG, but the frequency was similar between MuSK and AChR MG patients. Quantitative EMG revealed myopathic changes in the majority of both MuSK and AChR positive MG patients. This examination is sensitive, but it cannot be used to differentiate between MG patients belonging to the different disease groups. It should not be used in isolation. Rather, it should complement classical EMG in the detection of myopathic changes.     

Clinical and experimental features of MuSK antibody positive MG in Japan

We investigated the presence of antibodies (Abs) against muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) in Japanese myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. MuSK Abs were found in 23 (27%) of 85 generalized seronegative MG (SNMG) patients but not in any of the ocular MG patients. MuSK Ab-positive patients were characterized as having female dominance (M:F, 5:18), age range at onset 18 to 72 (median 45) years old, and prominent oculobulbar symptoms (100%) with neck (57%) or respiratory (35%) muscle weakness. Limb muscle weakness was comparatively less severe (52%), thymoma absent. Most patients had good responses to simple plasma exchange and steroid therapy. MuSK IgG from all 18 patients was exclusively the IgG 4 subclass and bound mainly with the MuSK Ig 1–2 domain. Serial studies of 12 individuals showed a close correlation between the variation in MuSK Ab titers and MG clinical severity ( P  = 0.01 by Kruskal–Wallis). MuSK Ab titers were sharply decreased in patients who had a good response to early steroid therapy or simple plasma exchange, but there was no change, or a rapid increase on exacerbation after thymectomy. Measurement of MuSK Ab titers aids in the diagnosis of MG and the monitoring of clinical courses after treatment.     

Anti-MuSK antibody myasthenia gravis: clinical findings and response to treatment in two large cohorts

Introduction: Myasthenia gravis (MG) patients with autoantibodies to muscle‐specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) represent a distinct subset of those with this disease. Treatment and outcomes data in these patients are limited and conflicting. Methods: We reviewed 110 MuSK‐MG patients from two large clinics in Italy and the USA. Results: Thirty‐nine to 49% of patients with generalized, acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR‐Ab)–negative MG had MuSK‐MG. Eighty‐five percent were female, with disease onset typically in the fourth decade. Ocular and/or bulbar symptoms were present at onset in 79% of those studied. Eighty‐five percent were MGFA class III or greater, and crisis occurred in 28%. Plasma exchange (PLEX) produced improvement in 93%, whereas only 61% improved after intravenous immunoglobulin. Long‐term outcomes were comparable to those of patients with AChR‐Ab–positive MG. Conclusions: MuSK‐MG has a marked female predominance with frequent oculobulbar weakness and crises. Many patients deteriorate rapidly early in the disease, and PLEX is usually the preferred treatment. Long‐term outcomes are similar to those of patients with AChR‐Ab⁺ MG. Muscle Nerve 44: 36–40, 2011     

Clinical comparison of muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibody-positive and -negative myasthenic patients

We assayed cryopreserved sera from 38 acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-negative patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) who were followed clinically for muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibodies and analyzed and compared their clinical characteristics. None of 13 sera from patients with purely ocular MG were positive. Sera from 10 of 25 patients (40%) with generalized MG were positive for MuSK antibodies. The age at onset of myasthenic symptoms was significantly earlier in MuSK antibody-positive patients (P = 0.02). MuSK antibodies were present in AChR antibody-negative patients of either gender, with virtually identical prevalence in women (41.2%) and men (37.5%). The distribution of weakness more commonly involved neck muscles in MuSK antibody-positive patients, and limb muscles in MuSK antibody-negative patients. Patients responded to immunosuppressive treatment regardless of whether MuSK antibody was present. We conclude that MuSK antibodies are present and diagnostically useful in a subset of myasthenic patients without AChR antibodies. Although the distribution of weakness differs somewhat depending on whether MuSK antibodies are present, responses to anticholinesterase and immunosuppressive treatments are similar.     

MuSK antibody-positive, seronegative myasthenia gravis in Korea.

Several reports from Western countries suggest differences in the clinical features of patients with muscle specific kinase (MuSK) antibody-positive and -negative seronegative myasthenia gravis (MG). We performed the first survey in Korea of MuSK antibodies, studying 23 patients with acetylcholine receptor (AChR)-antibody seronegative MG. MuSK antibodies were present in 4 (26.7%) of 15 generalized seronegative MG patients and none of 8 ocular seronegative MG patients. All four MuSK positive patients were females, with pharyngeal and respiratory muscle weakness, and required immunosuppressive treatment. However, overall disease severity and age at onset was similar to that of MuSK-negative MG and treatment responses were equally good.     

AChR myasthenia gravis switching to MuSK or double antibody positive myasthenia gravis in two children and literature review

Muscle–specific tyrosine kinase antibody (MuSK–Ab) and acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR–Ab) coexistence in myasthenia gravis (MG) is very rare. In this report, two children with AChR–Ab switching to double antibody positive MG (DP–MG) or MuSK–Ab positive MG (MuSK–MG) are described. Six similar cases were found in the literature via online database search. Therefore, this study describes eight patients in total, six female and two male. The average age of onset was 7.25 ± 5.95 years. Four AChR–MG patients switched to DP–MG with no known precipitating factor and four switched after thymectomy (two to MuSK–MG and two to DP–MG). After the serological switch, the patients transitioned to the phenotype of MuSK–MG and responded poorly to cholinesterase inhibitors and well to corticosteroids and plasma exchange.     

Anti-alkaline phosphatase antibody positive myasthenia gravis

Anti-alkaline phosphatase antibody (AP Ab) was specific in 9% of 249 anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) Ab-positive myasthenia gravis (MG) (SPMG) patients but not in patients with AChR Ab-negative MG (SNMG), other neurological and immunological diseases, or healthy volunteers. No cross-reactivity and no significant titer correlation were found between AP Ab and AChR Ab. We confirmed immunologically by radioimmunoassay and western blot analysis the presence of antibodies directed against AP. AP Ab-positive SPMG patients were characterized clinically as having female predominance and a more severe form of generalized MG than AP Ab-negative SPMG patients, and about half required artificial ventilation at maximum severity. AP Ab's pathogenic role in MG is yet unclarified, but our findings show AP to be a novel antigen among the various autoantigens present in MG patients and in whom AP Ab may modify clinical symptoms.     

Patterns and severity of neuromuscular transmission failure in seronegative myasthenia gravis

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and electrophysiological features of myasthenia gravis (MG) patients with (seropositive) or without (seronegative) antibodies to acetylcholine receptor. To investigate whether antibodies to muscle specific kinase (MuSK) and ryanodine receptor (RyR) are associated with particular features. METHODS: Clinical profiles and single fibre electromyography (SFEMG) in the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) were reviewed in consecutive 57 seropositive and 13 seronegative patients. Antibodies to MuSK and RyR were measured by immunoassays. RESULTS: Of the 13 seronegative patients, four (31%) were positive for MuSK antibodies and seven (54%) were positive for RyR antibodies, including all four MuSK positive patients. Clinical features were similar at presentation for seropositive and seronegative patients, but MuSK positive patients frequently developed myasthenic crises. Despite the similar clinical severities at the time of examination, the proportion with positive jitter (93% of seropositive patients, 50% of MuSK positive patients, and 44% of MuSK negative patients) and the extent of jitter (mean consecutive difference: 76 micros in seropositive patients, 36 micros in MuSK positive patients, and 30 micros in MuSK negative patients) were less in seronegative MG patients compared with seropositive MG patients. CONCLUSIONS: Seronegative MG is heterogeneous with respect to the presence of antibodies to MuSK. Impairment of neuromuscular synaptic transmission in EDC is less marked in seronegative than seropositive MG despite the similar clinical severity. This discrepancy may partly reflect the distribution of affected muscles in seronegative patients, but it is possible that other factors, such as impaired excitation-contraction coupling resulting from RyR antibodies, contribute to the clinical phenotype.     

Seronegative myasthenia gravis: disease severity and prognosis

Around 10-20% of myasthenia gravis (MG) patients do not have acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies (seronegative), of whom some have antibodies to a membrane-linked muscle specific kinase (MuSK). To examine MG severity and long-term prognosis in seronegative MG compared with seropositive MG, and to look specifically at anti-AChR antibody negative and anti-MuSK antibody negative patients. Seventeen consecutive seronegative non-thymomatous MG patients and 34 age and sex matched contemporary seropositive non-thymomatous MG controls were included in a retrospective follow-up study for a total period of 40 years. Clinical criteria were assessed each year, and muscle antibodies were assayed. There was no difference in MG severity between seronegative and seropositive MG. However, when thymectomized patients were excluded from the study at the year of thymectomy, seropositive MG patients had more severe course than seronegative (P < 0.001). One seropositive patient died from MG related respiratory insufficiency. The need for thymectomy in seronegative MG was lower than in seropositive MG. None of the seronegative patients had MuSK antibodies. This study shows that the presence of AChR antibodies in MG patients correlates with a more severe MG. With proper treatment, especially early thymectomy for seropositive MG, the outcome and long-term prognosis is good in patients with and without AChR antibodies.     

Muscle histopathology in myasthenia gravis with antibodies against MuSK and AChR

Aims: We compared myopathological features in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients with antibodies against AChR (seropositive) and muscle-specific tyrosin-kinase (MuSK). While the immunopathogenesis of seropositive MG is well known, there is a lack of pathological studies in anti-MuSK antibody-positive (MuSK+) MG. Methods: We analysed skeletal muscle biopsy features of 13 MG patients: 6 MuSK+ (all women) and 7 anti-AchR antibody-positive (AChR+) (2 women and 5 men). In our histopathological examination, we quantified the atrophy factor of both fibre types, and the extent of minicores, myofibrillar disarray, cytochrome c oxidase (COX)-negative fibres, mitochondrial aggregates and fibre type grouping. Results: Mean muscle fibre atrophy factor was higher in AChR+ MG than MuSK+ MG, both in type I fibres (494 vs. 210) and particularly in type II fibres (1023 vs. 300). Fibre type grouping was observed in AChR+ MG whereas COX-negative fibres were common in MuSK+ MG. Bulbar muscles were more severely affected in MuSK+ MG and the disease was more severe: the onset was usually earlier (39 years) with Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America score III in MuSK+ MG, and score II was found in AChR+ MG (62 years). Conclusions: Muscle biopsies of MuSK+ MG show myopathic signs with prominent mitochondrial abnormalities, whereas neurogenic features and atrophy are more frequently found in AChR+ MG. The mitochondrial impairment could explain the oculo-bulbar involvement in MuSK+ MG.     

The predictive value of the presence of different antibodies and thymus pathology to the clinical outcome in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis

Objectives

To analyze the predictive value of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies (anti-AChR Ab) and anti-muscle specific kinase antibodies (anti-MuSK Ab), as well as the thymus pathology to the clinical outcome in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (MG).

Methods

We analyzed 138 patients with generalized MG, who were thymectomized and assayed for anti-AChR Ab and anti-MuSK Ab.

Results

Anti-AChR Ab were detected in 84% of patients, while anti-MuSK Ab were present in 36% of the AChR Ab negative patients. Severe forms of the disease were more frequent in MuSK Ab positive, compared to the AChR Ab positive and complete seronegative patients. Thymic lymphoid follicular hyperplasia (LFH) was present in 60%, thymoma in 23%, atrophic thymus in 9% and the normal thymus in 8% of patients. LFH was more frequent among women, while thymoma and atrophic thymus were more frequent in men. The younger patients mainly had LFH and normal thymus, while thymoma and atrophic thymus were more frequent in older patients. The mildest clinical presentation was present in patients with normal thymus, while severe forms of the disease were registered in the patients with thymoma. The AChR Ab positive patients had more often LFH and thymoma, while within MuSK Ab positive patients atrophic thymus was most common.

Conclusion

The best disease outcome was observed in patients with normal thymus or LFH with anti-AChR Ab or without both types of antibodies.     

A case of myasthenia gravis with anti-MuSK antibodies showing a dramatic improvement with plasma exchange]

A 49-year-old woman with seronegative myasthenia gravis (SNMG) was admitted to our hospital with severe respiratory failure, proximal muscle weakness and bulbar palsy. Permanent tracheostomy and continuous mechanical ventilation were performed. At a previous hospital, she was diagnosed as SNMG on the basis of the positive waning during 3 Hz repetitive stimulation of the ulnar nerve, although no acetylcholine receptor antibodies (Ab) were detected by serological examination. Before admission to our hospital, she was treated with corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and tryptophan column immuno-adsorption therapy without clinical improvement. At our hospital, serological examination detected muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase (MuSK) Ab and plasma exchange was performed as treatment. Plasma exchange and subsequent immunomodulating therapy with corticosteroids and tacrolimus showed a dramatic clinical improvement with a marked decline of MuSK Ab level in the serum. These results suggested that plasma exchange should be considered as first choice to treat patients with refractory MuSK Ab-positive MG.     

Seronegative generalised myasthenia gravis: clinical features,antibodies, and their targets

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a well-recognised disorder of neuromuscular transmission that can be diagnosed by the presence of antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor (AChR). However, some patients (about 15%) with generalised MG do not have detectable AChR antibodies. There is some evidence, however, that this "seronegative" MG is an antibody-mediated disorder. Plasma from patients with the disorder seems to contain various distinct humoral factors: IgG antibodies that reversibly inhibit AChR function; a non-IgG (possibly IgM) factor that indirectly inhibits AChR function; and an IgG antibody against the muscle-specific kinase (MuSK). The presence of antibodies against MuSK appears to define a subgroup of patients with seronegative MG who have predominantly localised, in many cases bulbar, muscle weaknesses (face, tongue, pharynx, etc) and reduced response to conventional immunosuppressive treatments. Moreover, muscle wasting may be present, which prevents complete response to these therapies.     

AChR phosphorylation and indirect inhibition of AChR function in seronegative MG

BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% to 20% of patients with autoimmune MG do not have antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), so-called seronegative MG (SNMG). IgG antibodies from up to 70% of SNMG patients bind to the muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase, MuSK. The plasmas and non-IgG fractions from SNMG patients (and some with AChR antibodies) also contain a factor, perhaps an IgM antibody, that inhibits AChR function, but it is not clear how this factor acts and whether it is related to the MuSK IgG antibodies. METHODS: The authors studied 12 unselected SNMG plasmas and their non-IgG fractions; seven were positive for MuSK IgG antibodies. Ion flux assays, electrophysiology, phosphorylation, and kinase assays were used to look at mechanisms of action. RESULTS: Eight of the 12 plasmas and their non-IgG fractions inhibited AChR function, but the inhibitory activity was transient and did not correlate with the presence of MuSK IgG antibodies. Two of three plasmas added outside of a cell-attached patch pipette inhibited AChR function within the patch, and these two plasmas also increased AChR phosphorylation. CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose that a plasma factor(s) in SNMG patients, distinct from MuSK IgG antibodies, binds to a muscle membrane receptor and activates a second messenger pathway leading to AChR phosphorylation and reduced AChR function. Identifying the target for this factor should lead to improved diagnosis of MG in MuSK antibody-negative patients and may provide new insights into the function of the neuromuscular junction and pathophysiological mechanisms in MG.     

Effect of sera from AChR-antibody negative myasthenia gravis patients on AChR and MuSK in cell cultures

A proportion of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) do not have antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor (AChR). Some of these patients have antibodies to muscle specific kinase (MuSK), whereas others have neither antibody (seronegative MG, SNMG). Both MuSK antibody positive MG (MuSK-MG) and SNMG are antibody-mediated diseases but how they cause neuromuscular junction failure is not clear. One possibility is that they reduce the clustering and expression of AChRs. We looked at the effects of MuSK-MG and SNMG sera/IgG on surface AChR distribution and expression, and AChR subunit and MuSK mRNA by quantitative RT-PCR, in TE671 and C2C12 myotubes. In TE671 cells MuSK-MG sera reduced AChR expression by about 20%, but had no effect on AChR subunit or MuSK mRNA expression. In C2C12 myotubes, MuSK-MG sera caused a reduction in the number of agrin-induced clusters, but the clusters became larger and there was no significant effect on total surface AChR numbers or AChR subunit or MuSK mRNA. By contrast, SNMG sera not only reduced AChR numbers by about 20% in TE671 cells, but modestly upregulated AChR gamma subunit expression in TE671 cells and both AChR gamma subunit and MuSK expression in C2C12 myotubes. Thus, although these results have, disappointingly, demonstrated little effect of MuSK antibodies on AChR expression, they do imply that SNMG antibodies act on AChR-associated pathways.