A Case Report Demonstrating Spontaneous Change in Tachycardia Terminating Window

A patient who received a patient-activated pacemaker system for termination of paroxysmal, drug-resistant, ventricular tachycardia is described. During the pre-implant invasive electrophysiological (EP) study and the three post-implant non-invasive EP studies, tachycardias were easily and reproducibly terminated by two stimuli using the interval scanning mode. On the fourth day post-implant, this pacing mode no longer terminated tachycardia at rest. A new pacing mode using more stimuli was then found to terminate the tachycardia reproducibly under various physiological conditions. This case report demonstrated a spontaneous change in the tachycardia terminating window and the usefulness of versatility in antitachycardia pacemaker systems.     

The Initial Clinical Experience with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator/ Antitachycardia Pacemaker

Guardian antitachycardia pacing (ATP) 4210 is a third generation, multi-programmable cardioverter defibrillator undergoing Phase I clinical trials. The tiered response includes ATP, low energy cardioversion or defibrillation, and bradycardia support. Extensive telemetry is available, including an episode log and details of all episode events. Five patients underwent the implantation of Guardian ATP 4210 as part of a Phase I trial at the University of Louisville. Two of the five patients had multiple VT episodes that were reverted successfully using ATP pacing (slow VT) and defibrillation (fast VT) and VF episodes, which resulted in defibrillation therapy over a follow-up period of 6 to 8 months. Four of the five patients required bradycardia support for bradyarrhythmias unassociated with ATP therapy or defibrillation and one patient required bradycardia support postdefibrillation therapy. The device design is microprocessor based and requires continuous interrogation of the microprocessor memory and checks of the validity of programmed parameters to continue its operation. When the safety check fails, the device is designed to shut down its antitachycardia and defibrillator functions. This design feature has a potential for leaving the patient unprotected if the device shuts down. Modification of this feature is required to ensure the device's long-term safety.     

Clinical Experience with Implantable Scanning Tachycardia Reversion Pacemakers

Un stimu-lateur implantable et automatique de type scanning a été développé et utilisé pour l'intérruption des tachycardies chez l'homme. Depuis janvier 1982, 22 patients ont reçu ce stimulateur à St. Bartholomew's Hospital. Plus de 125 appareils ont été implantés au total dans le monde. Les résultats cliniques sont encourageants, surtout avec la deuxième géneration de stimulateurs.     

Clinical Experience with a New Software-Based Antitachycardia Pacemaker for Recurrent Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardias

The Intermedics Intertach 262-12 tachycardia reversion pulse generator was implanted in 14 patients (six male, eight female, mean age at implantation 45 +/- 16 years) with recurrent symptomatic tachycardias. Six patients had atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia, three patients had orthodromic tachycardia with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, two had circus movement tachycardia via a concealed bypass tract, two had ventricular tachycardia, one patient had atrial flutter. Mean duration of symptoms before implantation was 8 +/- 4 years and mean number of antiarrhythmic drug trials was 3.5 +/- 1. The primary tachycardia response made consisted of autodecremental pacing in one patient, burst pacing in two patients, and adaptive scanning of the initial delay or burst cycle length in eleven patients. The secondary tachycardia response mode consisted of autodecremental pacing in four patients, burst pacing in three patients and burst scanning in four patients. Tachycardia response was automatic in all but one patient with ventricular tachycardia. During a follow-up period of 30.5 +/- 10.6 months, one patient with ventricular tachycardia died from a nonarrhythmic cause. Reinterventions were necessary due to electrode fracture in one patient and due to pacemaker software defect in another one. Two patients underwent surgical cure of their arrhythmia: one patient with atrial flutter and one patient with AV nodal reentry tachycardia, 24 months and 11 months postpacemaker implantation, respectively. Four patients required digitalis to prevent pacing induced atrial fibrillation. Other proarrhythmic effects were not encountered. The pacemaker proved to be a versatile system with reliable tachycardia detection and termination functions. It provided a valuable adjunctive therapy in these selected patients.     

Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia: Clinical Experience with the Intertach Pacemaker

MCCOMB, J.M., ET AL.: Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia: Clinical Experience with the Intertach Pacemaker. During a 3-year period, 22 patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia have been treated with antitachycardia pacemakers [Intermedics Intertach, 262–12, n = 17, and Intertach II, 262–16, n = 5). Eighty-two percent were female, the mean age was 44 ± 14 years; 86% had atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Symptoms had occurred over 11.8 ± 7.1 years, with 3.6 hospital admissions per patient, despite 4.7 ± 2.1 antiarrhythmic drugs. Following pacemaker implantation, during a follow-up of 14.8 ± 11.5 months, only two patients have been readmitted to a hospital because of supraventricular tachycardia (mean 0.1 per patient). One patient is taking an antiarrhythmic agent, and four are taking beta adrenergic blocking agents. Thus, 23% are taking cardioactive drugs (it was anticipated that two patients would continue on drugs after pacemaker implantation). There have been no serious complications. Atrial antitachycardia is thus an effective therapy in carefully selected patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia, reducing hospital admissions for supraventricular tachycardia and reducing the need for antiarrhythmic drugs.     

Recognition of Mutiple Tachyarrhythmias by Rate-Independent Means Using a Small Microcomputer

New implantable devices are now available that can offer different therapies for different arrhythmias but they need a method of discriminating between these rhythms. Heart rate analysis is predominantly used to discern between sinus rhythm (SR) and pathological tachycardias but this may be of limited value when the rates of the rhythms are similar. An enhanced form of Gradient Pattern Detection (GPD) has been developed using an 8-bit microcomputer that can distinguish between Sfl and up to three other arrhythmias in real time. This is a method based on electrogram morphology where each rhythm s specific electrogram is classified by a sequence of gradient zones. The microprocessor of the computer is of similar processing power to ones used in current pacemakers. Five patients with multiple arrhythmias were studied. Four had ventricular tachycardia (VT) and one had three conduction patterns during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Bipolar endocardial right ventricular electrograms were recorded during SR and tachycardia in all patients. The computer would first learn about each different rhythm by a semi-automatic means. Once all the rhythms were learned the program would enter the GPD analysis phase. The computer would output a series of real-time rhythm specific marker codes onto a chart recorder as it recognized each rhythm. Sixteen different arrhythmias (13 VT, 3 SVT) were examined for this study. All rhythms (including SR) were distinguished from each other except in the case of one patient with six VTs where two VTs had identical shapes and therefore could not be detected apart. The method would be a useful addition to heart rate analysis for future generations of microprocessor assisted pacemakers.     

Potential Hazards of Implanted Devices for the Electrical Control of Tachyarrhythmias

Sensing difficulties are more common with antitachycardia devices employing atrial rather than ventricular leads, but the consequences are potentially more disastrous with ventricular leads. The problem may be magnified in that the spurious discharge from poor sensing is likely lobe asynchronous. Worsening of arrhythmias during termination attempts cannot be totally avoided, but may be minimized if caution and expertise are applied to selection and testing. A device which can reliably terminate a tachyarrhythmia accelerated by a termination attempt is the safest.     

Experience with a New Implantable Pacer-, Cardioverter-Defibrillator for the Therapy of Recurrent Sustained Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias: A Step Toward a Universal Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Control Device

Ten consecutive patients (mean age 57.9 +/- 7.6 years) were treated with an investigational tachyarrhythmia control device, the implantable Medtronic Pacer-, Cardioverter-, Defibrillator model 7216A or 7217B. All patients had coronary artery disease with old myocardial infarctions and presented hemodynamically significant sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias not suppressed by antiarrhythmic drug therapy and unrelated to acute myocardial infarction. In two patients a nonthoracotomy lead system was implanted. Lowest effective defibrillation energy ranged from 5 to 18 joules (mean 12.2 +/- 4 joules) for the epicardial bielectrode systems and were 15 and 18 joules for the nonthoracotomy lead system implants. The postoperative periods were unremarkable. Follow-up ranged from 7 to 19 months (mean 13.8 +/- 4.5 months). Spontaneous tachyarrhythmia episodes were detected and treated by the device in six patients, five of them received staged therapies. No deaths occurred and no hospital admissions were necessary for device related or ventricular tachyarrhythmia related complications. In conclusion, this integrated device represents a major step toward the development of a universal ventricular arrhythmia control device.     

Local Activation Time Derived from Stored EGM is Associated with Failure of Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Implantable Defibrillator

Background : Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) is an effective treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, persistent failure of ATP in some patients is well recognized. Methods : A method of deriving the local activation time from stored intracardiac electrograms in implantable cardioverter defibrillators is described. Using a case‐control design, the local activation times were compared between patients with persistent unsuccessful ATP with comparable controls with successful ATP. Results : The local activation times during VT in patients with failed ATP were longer at 120–180 ms compared with corresponding control patients with successful ATP (60–80 ms). The local activation time expressed as a proportion of VT cycle length in patients with failed ATP compared with patients with successful ATP were 0.40 ± 0.08 versus 0.19 ± 0.08 (P = 0.012). Conclusion : A novel method of deriving local activation time is described, and delayed local activation time may explain failure of ATP in terminating VT in some patients. (PACE 2010; 549–552)     

Implantable Pacers for Tachycardia Termination: Stimulation Techniques and Long-Term Efficacy

The long-term efficacy of pacing for termination o/supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) was reviewed. Increasingly complex and sophisticated antitachycardia pacing stimulation patterns have evolved, and are outlined. Although excellent results are reported with simple patterns, it may be that the more complex algorithms increase the percentage o/tachycardia patients who may be candidates for implantation of a device. In the papers reviewed, there were 460 patients, 268 with SVT, and 192 with VT. Results were judged to be good-excellent in 96.5% of both VT and SVT groups.     

Clinical Experience with the Intertach 262-12 Pulse Generator in Patients with Recurrent Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardia

FROMER, M., ET AL.: Clinical Experience with the Intertach 262-12 Pulse Generator in Patients with Recurrent Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardia. An antitachycardia pulse generator, the Intermedics Intertach 262-12 was implanted in 16 patients (14 patients with supraventricular tachycardia of various origins and two patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia), who were not responsive to various antiarrhythmic drug regimens. The follow-up was from 6–49 months (mean 30.9 ± 13.8). Five patients had a follow-up of over 3 years. The device was used in all patients. One patient with ventricular tachycardia died from a nonarrhythmic cause. Loss of responsiveness to burst pacing was observed in 1/14 patients with supraventricular tachycardia and nontolerance of antitachycardia pacing in one patient. Overall clinical success of pacing was observed in 13/16 patients = 81%. The pacemaker proved to be a versatile system with reliable tachycardia detection and termination functions.     

Automatic Implantable Cardioverter/ Defibrillator (AICD) and Antitachycardia Pacemaker (Tachylog): Combined use in Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

Antitachycardia pacing in ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) is associated with potential acceleration of VT: frequency of VT and discomfort of the patient (pt) can limit treatment with the AICD. We therefore evaluated the combined use of antitachycardia pacing and AICD in 6 of 14 patients (age 50–70. mean 60 years) with AICD implantation because of VT, which could he terminated by temporary overdrive pacing. With the interactive mode of the Tachylog, termination of VT by the pacemaker as well as by the AICD was assessed after implantation. In the automatic mode, the Tachylog functioned as a bipolar VVI device with antitachycardia burst stimulation: 2–5 stimuli, interval 260–300 ms. 1–2 interventions. During follow-up of 12±5 months, the Tachylog terminated VT reliably 20 to 327 times per patient. In three patients, burst stimulation accelerated VT, which was terminated then by the AICD discharge. Conclusion: Drug resistant ventricular tachyarrhythmias can be terminated by the Tachylog pacemaker avoiding patients' discomfort. In case of acceleration. ventricular tachyarrhythmias can be controlled by the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator. A universal pacemaker should combine antitachycardia pacing with back-up defibrillation mode.     

Determinants of Pace-Terminable Ventricular Tachycardia: Implications for Implantable Antitachycardia Devices

The next generation of implantable antitachycardia devices incorporate anti-tachycardia pacing for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia. To evaluate the potential determinants of pace terminability, we analyzed 62 episodes of induced monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. We found that the tachycardia cycle length and cycle length variability are the major determinants of pace terminability. These findings should be considered in the designing of ventricular tachycardia detection and termination algorithms.     

Long-Term Antitachycardia Pacing Experience for Supraventricular Tachycardia

A pacemaker was used to control drug-resistant reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in 40 patients. An antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in 37 for SVT; in one for ventricular tachycardia that could also be used to terminate SVT; in one SVT could be terminated with an activity rate variable pacemaker; and in one a DDD pacemaker was used for prevention and termination of SVT. Twenty patients had AV nodal reentrant tachycardias, eight had tachycardias due to a concealed accessory pathway, eight had a Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, three had reentrant atrial tachycardias, and one had atrial flutter. Twenty-two patients were paced from the right atrium, five from the coronary sinus, ten from the right ventricle, and three had a DDD pacemaker. During a total follow-up period of 1,503 (mean 38) months an estimated 16,240 episodes of tachycardia were terminated promptly at home, 58 required several attempts, 57 episodes lasted longer than 30 minutes but did not require medical attention, and 11 required hospital admission. Hospital admission for SVT decreased from one per patient-month (in the 3 months before implantation) to 1 per 137 patient-months after implantation. Additional reentrant tachycardias occurred in 13 patients. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in combination with a conservative antitachycardia pacing mode was required in four patients paced from the atrium to avoid pacing induced atrial fibrillation. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy was used in 42% of patients to help control SVT. Conclusions: (1) Drug-resistant SVTs can be safely and effectively managed on the long-term with antitachycardia pacemakers. (2) Rapid termination of SVT improved the quality-of-life significantly by avoiding prolonged episodes of tachycardia and repetitive hospital admissions.     

The Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia Using an Automatic Tachycardia Terminating Pacemaker

Implanted cardiac pacemakers may be used in the management of selected patients with ventricular tachycardia unresponsive to other forms of medical and surgicaJ therapy. We would like to report the successful treatment of such a patient utilizing a new multiprogrammable automatically activating ventricular burst pacemaker. Thorough electrophysiologic study preceded implantation, and was instrumental in choosing an effective terminating technique, in identifying the need for adjunctive drug therapy, and in testing the safety and efficacy of the implanted system. (PACE, Vol. 4, September-October, 1981)     

Clinical Results with Omni-Orthocor®, an Implantable Antitachycardia Pacing System

Omni-Orthocor * * Cordis Corp. Miami. FL, U.S.A.
234A and 239A are implantable pacers capable of synchronization with an external overdriver. Synchronous or asynchronous burst pacing, synchronized extrastimuli, or a combination of both can be obtained. Upon recognition of a tachycardia, the patient or physician can initiate pane-termination. Omni-Orthocor was implanted in 69 patients (53 for ventricular tachycurdia, 11 for supraventricular tachycardia, 2 each with AV nodal reentry and WPW, and 1 patient with concealed accessory pathway). Thirty-five patients performed out of hospital termination. More resistant tochycardias were terminated in the hospital with 76.3% success in VT and only 50% success for SVT. Burst pacing was used in 75% of patients. Noninvasive electrophysiologic study was performed on all patients, and was the sole use of Omni-Orthocor in 20 patients. The device was not implicated in the six sudden death patients in this series.     

Long-Term Efficacy of an Antitachycardia Pacemaker and Implantable Defibrillator Combination

Antitachycardia pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) were implanted in 14 patients to control recurrent hemodynamically stable ventricular tachycardia (VT), All patients underwent extensive preimplant testing in the elecrrophysiology laboratory documenting that in each patient at least 50 episodes of VT could be reliably terminated by an external model of the antitachycardia pacemaker. The burst scanning mode of anfitachycardia pacing was used in all patients. ICDs were implanted solely as a back up should acceleration of VT occur, and all had high nonprogrammable rate cutoffs (mean 191 ± 12 beats/min). During a mean follow-up of 25 ± 6 months, 6,029 episodes of VT were treated in the 14 patients. Only 103 ICD discharges were required (approximately one discharge per 60 episodes of VT). Ten of the 14 patients received discharges from their ICDs. No deaths have occurred. All devices remain active and in the automatic mode. Thus, an antitachycardia pacemaker and ICD combination can safely and effectively terminate VT in highly selected patients who are subjected to extensive preimplant testing. In such patients, the vast majority of episodes of VT can be terminated with antitachycardia pacing, and only rarely is a discharge required from the ICD.     

Predictors of Device Activation for Ventricular Arrhythmias and Survival in Patients with Implantable Pacemakers/Defibrillators

Predictors of survival and arrhythmia recurrence for patients with implanted defibrillators have been reported but patients with sustained, well-tolerated ventricular tachycardia were often excluded from these trials. Arrhythmia recurrence and survival in populations including these patients have been less well studied. The purpose of the present study was to examine predictors of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in patients who received a tiered therapy antitachycardia pacemaker/defibrillator for ventricular tachycardia, fibrillation, or both. Three hundred thirty-seven patients who received a Ventritex CADENCE® tiered therapy antitachycardia device at one of 19 participating centers between July 11, 1989 and March 4, 1991 are included in this retrospective analysis. Diagnostic summary data and stored electrograms telemetered from the implanted device were assessed to determine characteristics of recurrent arrhythmias. Mean follow-up was 360 ± 10 (SEM) days. Thirty-three patients died during follow-up. At least one recurrent ventricular arrhythmia was observed in 205 patients (61 %). A total of 7,539 episodes were observed with a mean of 37 ± 5 per patient. Patients with recurrent ventricular arrhythmias were slightly but significantly older (64 ± 0.7 vs 59 ± 1.2 years; P < 0.001) but were not distinguished by gender or underlying structural disease. Patients whose presenting arrhythmia was monomorphic ventricular tachycardia were more likely to experience recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (69% recurrence rate) than patients presenting with ventricular fibrillation or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (46% recurrence rate; P < 0.001). Cycle length of spontaneous tachycardia was also a predictor of arrhythmia recurrence. Patients having slower ventricular arrhythmias were less likely to remain recurrence free. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was similar for patients with and without recurrences. Younger age and absence of arrhythmia recurrence but not presenting arrhythmia were predictors of survival. We conclude that age and presentation with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia are important predictors of arrhythmia recurrence for this patient population. Exclusion of patients with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia underestimates the rate of recurrent ventricular arrhythmias and utilization of device therapy.     

Results of Delivered Therapy for VT or VF in Patients with Third-Generation Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

Third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) offer tiered therapy and can provide significant advantage in the management of patients with life-threatening arrhythmias. Three different types of ICDs were implanted in 21 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Arrhythmia presentation was VT(76%), VF(10%), or both (14%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction for the group was 32.4 ± 7%. No surgical mortality occurred. Prior to discharge individual EPS determined the final programmed settings of the ICDs. During a mean follow-up of 13 ± 1.4 months (range 2–20) the overall patient survival was 85.7%. No sudden arrhythmic or cardiac death occurred. Twenty of 21 patients (95%) received therapy by their device. In 14 patients (67%) antitachycardia pacing (A TP) was programmed "on," 13 of which was self-adaptative autodecremental mode. There were 247 VT episodes, 231 of which were subjected to ATP with 97% success and 3% acceleration or failure. Low energy shocks reverted all other VT episodes. VF episodes were successfully reverted by a single shock (93%), two shocks (6%), or three shocks (1 %). We conclude that ATP therapy of VT is successful in the large majority of episodes with rare failures, and that VF episodes are generally terminated by a single ICD shock.     

Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: How Many Attempts Are Useful?

The purpose of this study was to determine the termination and acceleration rates for 1 to 6 attempts of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) delivered by ICD in order to terminate spontaneously occurring VTs. Twenty-four ICD recipients with active ATP programs, including a maximum of six ATP sequences and spontaneously occurring VTs during follow-up, were investigated. During a mean follow-up of 42 ± 15 months (range, 17–63 months) 413 spontaneous VT episodes (17 ± 14; range, 1–49 per patient) resulting in appropriate ATP delivery by the ICD occurred. ATP successfully terminated 328 episodes (80 %) with a mean number of 1.6 ± 1.1 pacing sequences. Eighty episodes (19%) were accelerated by ATP and 5 (1%) were unresponsive to ATP. The ATP success decreased until the third ATP sequence (59%→ 31%→ 24%), but increased again in the fourth to sixth attempt (46%→ 46%→ 29%). The acceleration rate increased from sequence one to sequence three (8%→ 13%→ 28%), but decreased significantly in further ATP attempts (19%→ 0%→ 0%). The mean time delays until redetection or termination after 4, 5, and 6 attempts of ATP were 22 ± 5 seconds, 37 ± 2 seconds, and 41 ± 9 seconds, respectively. Nine patients (37%) used ≥3 ATP attempts during follow-up and all of them had a therapeutic benefit from it. Five out of 13 VTs (38%) treated with ≥4 attempts could ultimately be terminated by ATP. The results of this study demonstrate that the first ATP sequence is the most effective and that > 4 ATP attempts may be useful in a minority of patients. There seems to be a low risk of VT acceleration by the fourth to sixth ATP sequence. Because of the associated time delay, a high number of ATP attempts should only be programmed in patients with hemodynamically well-tolerated stable VTs.