Beclometasone dipropionate extrafine aerosol versus fluticasone propionate in children with asthma

Beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) extrafine is a hydrofluoroalkane-based, chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free inhalation aerosol. This study was conducted to determine whether BDP extrafine and CFC-fluticasone proprionate (FP) aerosols were equivalent in terms of efficacy and tolerability in children with symptomatic mild-to-moderate asthma. Male and female patients (aged 5-12 yr) with an asthma diagnosis for > or =3 months, peak expiratory flow (PEF) > or =60% of predicted normal and suboptimal asthma control were randomised to double-blind treatment with BDP extrafine 200 microg day(-1) (n=139) or CFC-FP 200 microg day(-1) (n=141) for up to 18 weeks. After 6 and 12 weeks, study medication was 'stepped down' to 100 and 50 microg day(-1), respectively, if patients had achieved good asthma control. Patients with poor asthma control discontinued from the study and those with intermediate control continued in the study but did not undergo a dose reduction. The estimated treatment difference in morning PEF% predicted at 6 weeks was -1.9% (90% CI -4.9, 1.0). There was a trend towards a greater increase in forced vital capacity (% predicted) in the BDP extrafine group (5.3 versus 0.4%; p=0.084). A 'step-down' in therapy to 100 microg day(-1) was possible in 36% and 42% of patients in the BDP extrafine and CFC-FP groups, respectively, at 6 weeks. Both drugs were well tolerated. BDP extrafine and CFC-FP aerosols were equally effective at improving asthma control in children with mild-to-moderate asthma at the same daily dose.     

Oropharyngeal candidiasis with dry-powdered fluticasone propionate: 500 microg/day versus 200 microg/day

We aimed to determine the frequency of oropharyngeal candidiasis and its clinical correlates in the asthmatic patients who use fluticasone propionate (FP) as a dry powdered inhaler. We selected four groups of patients: 62 asthmatic patients who were taking 200 microg/d FP, 122 asthmatics who were taking 500 microg/d FP, 50 asthmatic patients who had not been on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment and 40 normal non-asthmatic subjects. The frequency of positive swabs for Candida colonization was higher in 500 microg/d FP group than asthmatics without ICS use (chi2 = 6.8, p < 0.05) and normal controls (chi2 = 4.9, p < 0.05), whereas it wasn't different in the 200 microg/day FP group when compared to controls. When we considered patients who used ICS, the most effective variables affecting the occurrence of Candida colonization were washing of the throat by the patients (OR = 9.4, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] = 3.9-22.7, p < 0.0001) and duration of ICS use more than 12 months (OR = 2.5, 95 % CI = 1.1-2.6, p < 0.05). The present study showed that in the patients who use ICS, the most important determinants on colonization were not washing the throat regularly and duration of ICS use for more than 12 months.     

A comparative study of inhaled ciclesonide 160 microg/day and fluticasone propionate 176 microg/day in children with asthma

Ciclesonide (CIC) is an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with high anti-inflammatory activity and low incidence of local and systemic adverse effects. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of CIC with fluticasone propionate (FP) in children and adolescents with persistent asthma. This was a 12-week, randomized, double blind, parallel-group study. After a 2-to 4-week baseline period, a total of 556 children (ages 6-15 years) with asthma (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [FEV(1)], 50% to 90% predicted) were treated twice daily with CIC 80 microg (ex-actuator, equivalent to 100 microg ex-valve) or FP 88 microg (ex-actuator, equivalent to 100 microg ex-valve) administered via a hydrofluoroalkane-propelled metered-dose inhaler. A statistically significant increase from baseline was observed in FEV(1) for both CIC (285 +/- 16 ml) and FP (285 +/- 15 ml) (P < 0.0001 for both) and in morning and evening peak expiratory flow (P < 0.0001 for both). Significant improvements were seen in asthma symptoms, use of rescue medication, and asthma symptom-free days in both treatment groups, without any differences between the treatment groups in changes from baseline. Two FP-treated patients experienced oral candidiasis and one patient experienced voice alteration. Creatinine-adjusted 24-hr urine cortisol levels increased from baseline levels by 10% in the CIC group (P < 0.05) and by 6% in the FP group (not significant). The efficacy and safety of CIC 160 microg/day were comparable to those of FP 176 microg/day in children with asthma.     

Health-related quality of life in moderate asthma: 400 microg hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate vs 800 microg chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate. The Study Group

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP; 400 microg/d) with that of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) BDP (800 microg/d) on asthma health-related quality of life in a 12-week, parallel-group, multicenter study. BACKGROUND: HFA-BDP is a new CFC-free preparation of BDP, which was developed as a result of CFCs being phased out from metered dose inhalers. METHODS: Following 7 to 12 days of prednisone, 30 mg/d, 347 adults with moderate asthma were randomized to receive either 400 microg/d HFA-BDP, 800 microg/d CFC-BDP, or HFA placebo for 12 weeks (all other oral and inhaled steroids were withdrawn). Patients completed the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), and clinical asthma status was measured at the end of a run-in period, at randomization (after oral steroid treatment), and at the end of the study treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients withdrew, 43 due to worsening asthma (33 placebo; 5 HFA-BDP; 5 CFC-BDP). There was a deterioration in the AQLQ score (- 0.81) in the placebo group, and the difference between this and the stability observed in both the HFA-BDP group (+ 0.13) and the CFC-BDP group (- 0.03) was statistically significant (p 相似文献   

Treatment of steroid-dependent asthma patients with beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol.

Fifty-two steroid-dependent adults with chronic perennial asthma were transferred to beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol. The tests demonstrated a significant improvement with beclomethasone in terms of the diary score, bronchodilator use, and PEF and FEV1.0 measurements, as compared with the previous period of prednisolone treatment. Before the transfer, 26 of the patients displayed one or more diseases or symptoms which were probably due to systemic steroid medication. Morning cortisol levels, along with the response to tetracosactrin had in all cases returned to normal when tests were carried out 41 days after transfer to beclomethasone dipropionate. In a group of 12 patients with the lowest 11-OHCS basal values, the mean of their 11-OHCS values during prednisolone treatment was as low as 0.14 plus or minus 0.06 mumol/l, but tetracosactrin challenge induced an elevation to a normal level, 0.33 plus or minus 0.13 mumol/l. After 41 days of beclomethasone treatment, the corresponding values were 0.56 plus or minus 0.90 plus or minus 0.28 mumol/l. Thirty-seven patients experienced one or more disturbing symptoms after transfer to beclomethasone. In many cases, the symptoms of allergic rhinitis were troublesome and persistent leading to a sixfold increase in the use of antihistaminic tablets. When the patients had learned to exhale through the nose following beclomethasone inhalation, the use of antihistaminic tablets again diminished to some extent. Moreover, two cases of ulcerative colitis were encountered during the beclomethasone treatment. During a follow-up period of one year, 14 patients were again receiving prednisolone; most often, this was due to worsening of the asthma because of respiratory infections. During the beclomethasone treatment, a continuous significant improvement in PEF was noted after isoprenaline inhalation, suggesting that further benefit may be obtained by the employment of bronchodilator aerosols as an essential part of the treatment.     

Hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate, 400 microg, is as effective as chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate, 800 microg, for the treatment of moderate asthma

OBJECTIVE: The improved lung deposition of hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) extrafine aerosol compared with chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate (CFC-BDP) suggests that lower doses of HFA-BDP may be required to provide equivalent asthma control. The present study was undertaken to test this hypothesis. DESIGN: A 10- to 12-day run-in period confirmed that patients met established criteria of at least moderate asthma and the asthma was inadequately controlled by current therapy (inhaled beta-agonist and CFC-BDP [< or = 400 microg/d]). A short course of oral prednisone, 30 mg/d for 7 to 12 days, was followed to establish the patients were steroid responsive and to provide an "in-study" baseline of "optimal" asthma control. PATIENTS: A total of 347 patients were then randomized to HFA-BDP 400 microg/d, CFC-BDP 800 microg/d, or HFA-placebo for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Morning peak expiratory flow (AM PEF) measurements showed that HFA-BDP 400 microg/d achieved equivalent control of asthma to CFC-BDP 800 microg/d at all time intervals after oral steroid treatment. All other efficacy variables supported the AM PEF results and both active treatments were more effective than placebo. The safety profile of HFA-BDP compared favorably with that of CFC-BDP with no unexpected adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that HFA-BDP provides equivalent control of moderate or moderately severe asthma as CFC-BDP in the population studied, but at half the total daily dose.     

Initiation of maintenance treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/100 microg bd versus fluticasone propionate 100 microg bd alone in patients with persistent asthma: integrated analysis of four randomised trials

OBJECTIVES: To identify the asthma patients, on short-acting beta2-agonists alone, who would benefit from initial maintenance therapy (IMT) with salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) propionate 50/100 microg bd compared with fluticasone propionate (FP) 100 microg bd alone. The results of an integrated analysis of data from four previous trials are presented. METHODS: The four original trials were randomised, double-blind, parallel group studies and included patients who had received IMT with SFC 50/100 microg bd or FP 100 microg bd. Patients were >or=12 years with a 6 month history of asthma and >or=15% reversibility in FEV1. Patients had either not received inhaled corticosteroids in the preceding month or were steroid na?ve. Patients were assessed to determine whether any GINA-defined asthma characteristics or combination of asthma characteristics could predict those individuals who would achieve well controlled asthma status with IMT with SFC rather than with inhaled steroid alone. Patients with persistent asthma were assessed based on GINA-defined baseline asthma characteristics and well controlled asthma status in response to each treatment was investigated according to combinations of these baseline features. Subsequently, a further range of endpoints, including asthma symptoms, rescue medication use and asthma control, were analysed over weeks 1-12 for the combinations of features where the treatment difference in well controlled asthma status was greatest. RESULTS: The results of the initial analyses demonstrated that patients exhibiting two or three features of uncontrolled asthma at baseline were more likely to achieve well controlled asthma when treated with SFC than with FP alone, the most significant difference being observed in patients with three baseline features (odds ratio 2.60, 95% CI: 1.87, 3.62, p<0.001). Patients with one baseline feature showed no difference between the FP and SFC groups. Further analyses on data from patients with two or three baseline asthma features, showed that treatment with SFC resulted in significantly greater improvements in mean morning PEF, percentage symptom-free days, nights with no awakenings and rescue-free days compared with FP. In addition, asthma control was achieved earlier in patients in the SFC group. SFC and FP were well tolerated as shown previously in the four individual trials. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on short-acting beta2-agonists alone with two or three features of uncontrolled asthma (moderate to severe airflow limitation/daily symptoms/daily rescue medication use) are most likely to achieve better control, earlier, with SFC 50/100 microg bd initial maintenance treatment compared with FP 100 microg bd alone.     

Efficacy of fluticasone propionate compared with beclomethasone dipropionate in bronchial asthma: improvement in compliance and symptoms by fluticasone.

Recent studies have shown that fluticasone propionate (FP) was more effective than beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) inhalation even at a dose reduced by twofold or more in the treatment of bronchial asthma. Here, we further compared the effectiveness of FP and BDP, including rates of drug compliance. Forty-two symptomatic patients were treated by BDP (1000 +/- 345; mean +/- SD; microgram/day) for 8 weeks, followed by FP at one-half the respective dose, and peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in 1 second were investigated. In addition, the patients were asked about drug compliance and factors related to compliance (expressed using a visual analogue scale). Significant increases of peak expiratory flow (from 316 +/- 96 L/minute to 345 +/- 86 L/minute) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (from 1.7 +/- 0.5 L to 1.9 +/- 0.4 L) were found. Furthermore, significantly higher scores were obtained for compliance and various factors related to compliance. These data indicate that FP is more effective than a twofold higher dosage of BDP and that better compliance with the use of FP, probably because of improved various factors associated with FP compliance, contributes to FP efficacy.     

Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination therapy 50/250 microg twice daily is more effective than budesonide 800 microg twice daily in treating moderate to severe asthma

Three hundred and fifty-three asthmatic patients who remained symptomatic despite treatment with budesonide 800-1200 microg day(-1) (or equivalent) were randomized to a new combination therapy comprising salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone propionate 250 microg (Seretide, Advair, Viani 50/250 microg) twice daily or budesonide 800 microg twice daily for 24 weeks. Patients kept daily records of their morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), daytime and night-time symptom scores and daytime and night-time use of rescue salbutamol. Mean morning PEF increased by 451 min(-1) (baseline 361 l min(-1)) in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SFC) group and by 19 l min(-1) (baseline 358 l min(-1)) in the budesonide group over the 24 weeks. The adjusted mean morning PEF over weeks 1 to 24 was significantly greater in the SFC group, despite the > three-fold lower corticosteroid dose (406 vs. 380 l min(-1); P < 0.001). A significantly greater improvement in evening PEF was also seen in the SFC group (adjusted mean 416 vs. 398 l min(-1); P<0.001). SFC also provided significantly better control of daytime symptoms and a significantly greater reduction in the requirement for rescue salbutamol compared with budesonide. These results demonstrate that SFC 50/250 microg twice daily is superior to budesonide 800 microg twice daily in the management of patients with moderate to severe asthma who are symptomatic on their existing dose of corticosteroid.     

Cost-effectiveness of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination product 50/250 microg twice daily and budesonide 800 microg twice daily in the treatment of adults and adolescents with asthma. International Study Group

Despite a good understanding of the disease and its treatments, asthma continues to place a large economic burden on healthcare systems. As such, it is important to consider the economic impact of alternative therapeutic options for the treatment of this condition to ensure that scarce resources are used in the most efficient manner possible. Thus, the aim of asthma management from an economic perspective is to reduce the burden of this disease through maximizing health gain with available resources. A prospective economic analysis was conducted as part of a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, comparative trial of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination product (SFC) 50/250 microg twice daily vs. budesonide (800 microg twice daily) in adults and adolescents with asthma who were symptomatic despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids at doses of 800-1200 microg day(-1). Treatment effectiveness was measured in terms of successfully-treated weeks, defined as a > or =5% improvement in morning peak expiratory flow, episode-free days (a day without the need for rescue medication, no nocturnal awakening or adverse events) and symptom-free days. Cost-effectiveness analyses were performed using direct healthcare and drug costs, from the perspective of the Swedish healthcare system (1998 prices), with appropriate sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of the findings. Overall, SFC produced significantly higher (P<0.001) proportions of successfully-treated weeks, episode-free days and symptom-free days. Direct asthma management costs were similar between the two groups [SEK19.6 ($US2.4) for SFC vs. SEK18.5 (SUS2.2) for budesonide]. The cost per successfully-treated week was lower for SFC than for budesonide [SEK204 ($US24.8) vs. SEK300 ($US36.4) per week], as were the costs per episode-free day [SEK51.1 ($US6.2) vs. SEK75.1 ($US9.1) per day] and symptom-free day [SEK42.2 ($US5.1) vs. SEK53.0 ($US6.4) per day]. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios showed that the additional costs to achieve additional benefits with SFC were minimal. Costs per additional successfully-treated week, symptom-free day and episode-free day with SFC were SEK31.6 ($US3.9), SEK9.2 ($US1.1) and SEK7.7 ($US0.9), respectively, relative to budesonide. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were stable over a wide range of assumptions. The results suggest that SFC is a more cost-effective treatment than budesonide in the management of moderate to severe asthma.     

Efficacy and safety of low-dose fluticasone propionate compared with zafirlukast in patients with persistent asthma

To compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate and zafirlukast in patients with relatively stable persistent asthma who were previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids and short-acting beta(2)-agonists.A total of 440 patients (> or =12 years of age) previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids (beclomethasone dipropionate or triamcinolone acetonide) and short-acting beta(2)-agonists were included in this randomized double-blind study. After an 8-day run-in period, patients were treated with fluticasone (88 microg) or zafirlukast (20 mg) twice daily for 6 weeks. Outcome measures included pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)], peak expiratory flow [peak flow]), albuterol use, asthma symptoms, withdrawals due to lack of efficacy, and asthma exacerbations.Patients treated with fluticasone (n = 224) experienced greater mean increases in FEV(1) (0.24 L vs. 0.08 L, P <0.001), morning peak flow (30 L/min vs. 6 L/min, P <0.001), and evening peak flow (23 L/min vs. 5 L/min, P <0.001) during the study than did those treated with zafirlukast (n = 216). Fluticasone-treated patients had significantly greater increases in the mean percentages of symptom-free days (22% vs. 8%, P <0.001), rescue-free days (23% vs. 10%, P = 0.002), nights with uninterrupted sleep (<1% vs. -5%, P = 0.006), and fewer asthma exacerbations (1% vs. 6%, P = 0.005). Fewer fluticasone-treated patients were withdrawn due to lack of efficacy (2% vs. 13%, P <0.001).Inhaled fluticasone was more effective than zafirlukast in maintaining or improving asthma control in patients with relatively stable asthma who were switched from low-dose inhaled corticosteroids.     

Efficacy of budesonide Turbuhaler compared with that of beclomethasone dipropionate pMDI in Japanese patients with moderately persistent asthma

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide Turbuhaler with that of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) pMDI. METHODOLOGY: Three hundred and fifty adult asthma patients (mean age 52.7 years, mean baseline morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 294 L/min (< 80% predicted normal)), taking BDP via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), 400 microg daily for at least 2 months, were randomized in an open 6 week study to receive daily doses of either budesonide 100 microg or 400 microg twice daily via Turbuhaler or continued treatment with BDP, 100 microg four times daily. The primary efficacy variable was the mean change in morning PEF from baseline to the end of treatment. Outcome was also assessed using symptom scores and investigators' assessments employed in Japanese clinical trials. RESULTS: At the end of the 6 week treatment period, mean morning PEF improved significantly from baseline in both budesonide groups, 16 L/min and 33 L/min in the 200 microg and 800 microg groups, respectively, but not in the BDP group, 5 L/min. There was no significant difference between 200 microg budesonide and 400 microg BDP treatment in the effect on PEF (P = 0.29), but 800 microg budesonide was significantly superior to BDP (P < 0.001). Final assessment of improvement and usefulness ratings showed that both budesonide treatments were significantly superior to BDP (P < 0.001). All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Budesonide Turbuhaler (200 microg) was as effective as 400 microg BDP pMDI. The efficacy of budesonide was improved significantly by increasing the dosage to 800 microg daily. The study design shows the importance of including a higher dose treatment group when comparing two formulations of inhaled corticosteroids in order to determine whether the treatments to be compared are on the steep part of the dose-response curve. Without that information, comparative studies are usually inconclusive.     

Randomized comparison of ciclesonide 160 and 640 microg/day in severe asthma

OBJECTIVE: Demonstrating clinical benefit of higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma is frequently problematic owing to their relatively flat dose-response curve in this condition. In this study we compared the efficacy and safety of a fourfold difference in the dose of ciclesonide-ciclesonide 320 microg twice daily (CIC640) versus ciclesonide 160 microg once daily (CIC160)-in patients with severe persistent asthma. METHODS: Patients with bronchial asthma (6 months) were included in this randomized, double-blind study. After receiving fluticasone propionate 250 microg twice daily during run-in, patients were randomized to CIC160 (n=339) or CIC640 (n=341) for 12 weeks. Primary endpoints were time to first asthma exacerbation and forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)). Secondary endpoints included other lung function variables, asthma symptom scores and rescue medication use (RMU). RESULTS: Asthma exacerbations occurred in 12.7% of patients receiving CIC160 and 6.7% receiving CIC640. CIC640 was superior for time to first exacerbation (p=0.0050, one-sided). FEV(1) increased significantly with CIC160 and CIC640 (least squares mean+/-SE of mean: 269+/-31 and 332+/-31 mL, respectively; p<0.0001), with no significant difference between groups. Change in % predicted FEV(1) and morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) were significantly higher with CIC640 (p<0.05). Asthma symptom score sums and RMU decreased in both groups; CIC640 was statistically superior (p=0.0108 and 0.0005, respectively). No unexpected adverse events were reported in either group and the majority of the events reported were mild or moderate in intensity. No significant changes in serum cortisol were observed from the baseline to the study end. Small decreases in creatinine-adjusted 24h urine cortisol levels from baseline were seen in both the treatment groups, which, due to the large patient numbers, were statistically significant (p<0.05); however, no dose-response effect was seen and the difference between groups was not significant (p=0.7892). CONCLUSION: CIC640 was superior to CIC160 for time to first exacerbation, % predicted FEV1, morning PEF, asthma symptom score sum and RMU in patients with severe asthma; both doses had similar tolerability profiles and no significant changes in serum cortisol were seen in either treatment group.     

A clinical trial of treating asthma of moderate severity with beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol]

In order to investigate the efficacy of steroid inhalation in treating asthma of moderate severity, a single-blind, randomized short-term (3-4 weeks) trial was performed in 25 asthmatics uncontrolled by salbutamol inhalation, oral aminophylline and beta 2-agonist. 22 patients finished the trial. Among them, twelve received beclomethasone dipropionate 300 mcg/day and ten received placebo. There was significant improvement in asthmatic symptoms and pulmonary function (FEV1.0, V50, V25) in the group treated with steroid inhalation at the end of this trial, whereas no significant changes were observed in the placebo group. The results demonstrated that steroid inhalation could effectively control asthma of moderate severity.     

Effect of dosing schedule on efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol in chronic asthma

Fifty-two children 6 to 12 yr of age and 37 young adults 13 to 38 yr of age with moderate to severe extrinsic asthma requiring daily bronchodilators and who had been taking beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) for at least 3 months were evaluated. All patients received their regular daily medications and BDP, 2 inhalations 4 times a day (q.i.d.) (total dose, 336 micrograms/day), for 2 wk; they were then randomized to receive either BDP or placebo aerosol, 4 inhalations twice a day (b.i.d.), with the same total dose/day as well as their regular medications, for 8 wk. Placebo patients deteriorated significantly by comparison with BDP patients in respiratory symptoms and pulmonary functions. More placebo than BDP patients ended participation in the study prematurely because of increasingly severe symptoms. In the 89 study patients, there were no significant differences in respiratory symptoms or pulmonary function measurements between the b.i.d. and q.i.d. dosage regimens in either pediatric or adult age groups. There were no significant changes in mean morning cortisol levels from baseline measurements to the end of the study period; at that time, all patients had a normal ACTH stimulation test. We conclude that BDP (336 micrograms/day) is as effective and safe for control of asthma symptoms with b.i.d. as with q.i.d. dosage schedules in pediatric and young adult patients.     

The efficacy and safety of combination salmeterol (50 microg)/fluticasone propionate (500 microg) inhalation twice daily via accuhaler in Chinese patients with COPD

BACKGROUND: Few studies of the efficacy and safety of therapy with combinations of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SFCs) have been conducted in Chinese patients with COPD, and the benefits of combination therapy in nonsmoking patients with COPD are, to our knowledge, not known. STUDY OBJECTIVES: The aims were to establish the efficacy and tolerability of the therapy with SFC (salmeterol, 50 microg/fluticasone, 500 microg, twice daily) in the management of Chinese COPD patients and to investigate the effectiveness of SFC in nonsmokers with COPD. METHODS AND PATIENTS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study. Changes in prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator FEV(1), quality of life determined by the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores, relief bronchodilator use, nighttime awakenings, and frequency of exacerbations of COPD were measured in patients randomized to receive SFC (n = 297) or placebo (n = 148). Never-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers accounted for 11.7%, 66.7%, and 21.6%, respectively, of the study population. RESULTS: After 24 weeks, the mean changes in prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator FEV(1) were 180 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], approximately 91 to 268; p < 0.001) and 65 mL (95% CI, approximately 14 to 115; p = 0.012), respectively, greater for the SFC group than that for the placebo group. The differences in response to treatment were significant (all p < 0.0001) in former or current smokers but not in never-smokers (p > 0.05). The mean improvement in the total SGRQ score for the SFC group was 5.74 (p < 0.01) greater than that for the placebo group. SFC significantly reduced the frequency of nighttime awakenings and the use of relief bronchodilator. The adjusted ratio of exacerbations of COPD for the SFC group relative to the placebo group was 0.61 (95% CI, approximately 0.45 to 0.84; p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the SFC and placebo groups in safety measures. CONCLUSIONS: SFC therapy achieved sustained improvement in lung function, quality of life, and control of symptoms, and was well tolerated in Chinese patients. Greater improvements in lung function were found only for COPD patients with a history of smoking. Trial registration: http://ctr.gsk.co.uk/Summary/fluticasone_salmeterol/studylist.asp Identifier: No. SCO100540.     

Improvement in health-related quality of life with fluticasone propionate compared with budesonide or beclomethasone dipropionate in adults with severe asthma

OBJECTIVE: Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were evaluated in adults with severe asthma following inhaled corticosteroid treatment with high-dose beclomethasone dipropionate or budesonide (BDP/BUD) and compared with fluticasone propionate taken at approximately half the dose of BDP/BUD. METHODOLOGY: HRQoL was assessed as part of an open, multicentre, randomized, parallel-group study in Australia evaluating the safety and efficacy of switching to fluticasone propionate (FP) 1000-2000 micro g/day (n = 67) compared with remaining on BDP/BUD >/=1750 micro g/day (n = 66) for 6 months. Patients completed two HRQoL questionnaires, the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36), at baseline and at weeks 12 and 24. A change in AQLQ score of >/=0.5 was considered to be clinically meaningful. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in HRQoL with FP on four of the eight dimensions on the SF-36 (i.e. physical functioning, general health, role-emotional, and mental health), while there were no significant improvements in HRQoL in the BDP/BUD group. Overall, patients in the FP group experienced significantly greater improvement (P < 0.001) in AQLQ scores at weeks 12 and 24 compared with the BDP/BUD group. On the individual domains of the AQLQ, there were significant treatment differences (P < 0.01) in favour of FP in three of the four domains (activity limitations [0.92], symptoms [0.73], and emotional function [1.02]). Mean differences between groups for overall score and these three domains were also clinically meaningful. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe asthma who received FP (at approximately half the dose of BDP/BUD) experienced statistically significant, as well as clinically meaningful, improvements in their HRQoL.