A phase II trial of vinorelbine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer

The objective of the present study is to investigate the clinical efficacy and tolerance of vinorelbine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with prior taxane and/or anthracycline treatment. A total of 25 patients who previously received taxane- and/or anthracycline-based chemotherapy as first- and/or second-line treatment of MBC were entered into the study and were treated with 20 mg/m2 vinorelbine on day 1 and 8 and 30 mg/m2 PLD on day 1 every 3 weeks. All were evaluated for efficacy, quality of life, and tolerance. Three complete and 6 partial responses were observed in 25 patients for an objective response rate of 36% (95% confidence interval: 17-55%). Eight patients (32%) had stable disease of not less than 3 months and 8 patients (32%) had disease progression. The median progression-free survival was 6.7 months (range, 2-18 months), and the median overall survival was 13.2 months (range, 3-31 months). Severe toxicities (grade 3 or above) were neutropenia (16%) and mucositis (8%). The health-related quality of life assessed before each cycle by specific questionnaire did not differ significantly over the treatment period. The combination of vinorelbine and PLD for anthracycline- and/or taxane-pretreated patients with MBC is an active and safe regimen that does not compromise the quality of life.     

A multicentric observational trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for metastatic breast cancer

Background  

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is active in metastatic breast cancer. This observational study evaluated the efficacy and safety of PLD in patients treated during routine clinical practice.     

Impact of geriatric risk factors on pegylated liposomal doxorubicin tolerance and efficacy in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients: Final results of the DOGMES multicentre GINECO trial

BackgroundMetastatic breast cancer chemotherapy in the elderly is considered effective in carefully selected patients, but there is little data regarding its effect in vulnerable patients.MethodsWe evaluated tumour response (primary endpoint), feasibility and outcomes after six courses of an adapted dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) (40 mg/m² every 28 days) as first-line chemotherapy for hormone-resistant MBC.ResultsOf 60 patients >70 years (median 77 years), 15% had performance status ?2 and 73% had visceral metastases. Geriatric assessment included: ?2 comorbidities, 42%; ?1 deficiency in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), 10% and Instrumental ADL (IADL), 82%; living in residential homes, 12%; albumin <35 g/L, 17%; body mass index (BMI) <21, 20%; depression, 17%; and lymphocytes ?1 × 10³/mm³, 27%. Complete response, partial response and stable disease were observed in 5%, 15% and 60%, respectively, but only 48% completed six cycles. Treatment discontinuations were mostly due to disease progression (18%) and non-haematological (NH) toxicities (22%). Eight patients died during treatment (three possibly related to PLD), and 15 had unplanned hospital admissions. Exploratory analyses to identify geriatric covariates associated with treatment outcomes revealed severe haematological toxicities significantly correlated with lymphocytes ?1 × 10³/mm³. NH toxicities correlated with age ?80 years and living in residential homes. Progression-free survival (median 6.1 months) decreased with age, deficiency in IADL, cardiac dysfunction and living in residential homes. Overall survival (median 15.7 months) also decreased with living in residential homes.ConclusionDespite manageable haematological toxicities and expected response rates, PLD feasibility was poor in unselected elderly patients.     

Myotax: a phase II trial of docetaxel plus non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as first-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer previously treated with adjuvant anthracyclines

Aim

Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) has demonstrated equivalent antitumour activity to conventional doxorubicin and a significantly lower risk of cardiotoxicity when given as a single agent or in combination with cyclophosphamide. This phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of NPLD and docetaxel combination in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously exposed to adjuvant anthracyclines.

Patients and methods

Thirty-four patients received NPLD 60 mg/m² and docetaxel 75 mg/m² in a 21-day cycle as first-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer. Treatment was planned for six cycles and was continued until progression or toxicity.

Results

Objective response rate among response-assessable patients was 79% (95% CI (confidence interval), 64–94%) and 27% (95% CI, 11–43%) presented a complete response. Median progression free survival was 11.3 months (95% CI, 6.2–13.3 months) and median overall survival was 28.2 months (95% CI, 16–36.4 months). Symptomatic grade 3 cardiotoxicity occurred in 15% of cases and febrile neutropenia in 47% of the patients.

Conclusions

The combination of NPLD and docetaxel demonstrated high antitumour activity in a population of metastatic breast cancer patients exposed to adjuvant anthracyclines and showed an unexpected and unexplained 15% symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction rate.     

Phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) and docetaxel as first-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the activity and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD; Caelyx) and docetaxel combination as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with a median age of 63 years were treated with PLD 30 mg/m(2) (day 1) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (day 2) every 3 weeks for six cycles. Recombinant human Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (rhG-CSF) could be used in patients with grade > or =3 neutropenia after the first cycle. RESULTS: Forty-two of 44 patients were assessable for response. The response rate (RR) was 64.3% (95% confidence interval 49.8% to 78.8%). Six patients (14.3%) achieved complete response (complete disappearance of all measurable and assessable disease lasting at least 4 weeks, no new lesions, no disease-related symptoms), partial response was observed in 21 patients (50%) > or =50% decrease of measureable disease lasting at least 4 weeks, no progression of assessable disease, no new lesions, no disease-related symptoms), eight patients had stable disease and seven patients progressive disease. Median disease-free and overall survival were not reached, but were in excess of 17 months (range 6-17 months). Twenty of the patients had received previous adjuvant chemotherapy (10 with epirubicin-containing regimen with a median cumulative dose of 400 mg/m(2)). Grade > or =3 neutropenia occurred in 18.4% and neutropenic fever in 9% of patients. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia was observed in four patients. Dose reduction was necessary in seven patients. Two patients discontinued treatment: one due to prolonged grade 3-4 neutropenia and one due to neurotoxicity. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PLD and docetaxel achieved high RRs with acceptable toxicity as first-line treatment in MBC.     

Docetaxel and doxorubicin compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial.

PURPOSE: This randomized, multicenter, phase III study compared doxorubicin and docetaxel (AT) with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) as first-line chemotherapy (CT) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 429) were randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (n = 214) or doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) (n = 215) on day 1, every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. RESULTS: Time to progression (TTP; primary end point) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were significantly longer with AT than AC (median TTP, 37.3 v 31.9 weeks; log-rank P =.014; median TTF, 25.6 v 23.7 weeks; log-rank P =.048). The overall response rate (ORR) was significantly greater for patients taking AT (59%, with 10% complete response [CR], 49% partial response [PR]) than for those taking AC (47%, with 7% CR, 39% PR) (P =.009). The ORR was also higher with AT in patients with visceral involvement (58% v 41%; liver, 62% v 42%; lung, 58% v 35%), three or more organs involved (59% v 40%), or prior adjuvant CT (53% v 41%). Overall survival (OS) was comparable in both arms. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was frequent in both groups, although febrile neutropenia and infections were more frequent for patients taking AT (respectively, 33% v 10%, P <.001; 8% v 2%, P =.01). Severe nonhematologic toxicity was infrequent in both groups, including grade 3/4 cardiac events (AT, 3%; AC, 4%). CONCLUSION: AT significantly improves TTP and ORR compared with AC in patients with MBC, but there is no difference in OS. AT represents a valid option for the treatment of MBC.     

Gemcitabine as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase II trial.

OBJECTIVES: This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Women with histologically or cytologically confirmed bidimensionally measurable MBC not amendable to curative surgery or radiation were eligible. Prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease was not permitted. Patients received gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 for 3 weeks every 28 days for a maximum of 8 cycles. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients, with a median age of 58 years, were enrolled. The overall response rate for the 35 evaluable patients was 37.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.5-55.1%), with 2 complete responses and 11 partial responses. Median time to progression and survival were 5.1 months (95% CI, 3.5-8.8 months) and 21.1 months (95% CI, 11.0-26.9 months), respectively. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, with a median of 4 cycles completed. Grade 4 toxicities were 1 infection and 1 abnormal pulmonary function. Grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 30.3% and 6.3% of patients, respectively. The most common grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity was nausea/vomiting (10.3%). Five of 21 patients had improved Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores. CONCLUSION: Single-agent gemcitabine is active and well tolerated as first-line treatment in patients with MBC.     

Vinorelbine plus trastuzumab combination as first-line therapy for HER 2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients: an international phase II trial

The aim of this international phase II trial was to determine the efficacy and safety profile of weekly vinorelbine plus trastuzumab as first-line chemotherapy for women with HER 2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Sixty-nine patients with tumours overexpressing HER 2 received vinorelbine: 30 mg m-2 week-1 and trastuzumab: 4 mg kg-1 on day 1 as a loading dose followed by 2 mg kg-1 week-1 starting on day 8. Sixty-two patients were evaluable for response and 69 patients were evaluable for toxicity. The overall response rate was 62.9%. The median time to response was 8.4 weeks, the median duration of response was 17.5 months, the median progression-free survival was 9.9 months (95% CI, 5.6-12.1) and the one-year progression-free survival was 39.1%. The median survival for all patients was 23.7 months (95% CI, 18.4-32.6). This regimen was safe: grade 3-4 neutropenia were observed over 17.7% of courses in 83.8% of patients, with only two episodes of febrile neutropenia (0.1%) in two patients (2.9%). Only one patient discontinued treatment due to grade 3 symptomatic cardiac dysfunction that resolved with therapy. Vinorelbine plus trastuzumab is one of the most active treatment regimens for patients with HER 2-positive metastatic breast cancer and demonstrates a very favourable safety profile allowing prolonged treatment with long-term survival. This study has been presented in part at the following conferences: The San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, TX, USA, 2003; The American Society of Clinical Oncology, Orlando, FL, USA, 2005.     

Phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase II clinical trial to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had measurable disease, no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, and a performance status 相似文献   

Weekly pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma: A phase II study

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has the advantage of delivering active anthracycline directly to the tumor site, while exposing the patient to a lesser degree of doxorubicin-associated toxicities. Recently, a regimen in which paclitaxel is infused weekly over 1 h produced substantial antitumor activity with little myelosuppression. We designed a phase II trial to study the efficacy and toxicity of 10 mg/m(2) PLD on Days 1, 8 and 15, plus 70 mg/m(2) paclitaxel weekly in patients with untreated metastatic breast cancer and a high risk of cardiotoxicity. The study included 35 patients, with 31 (88.5%) evaluable for efficacy and 35 (100%) for toxicity. A total of 28 patients (80%) had two or more sites of disease. Overall, 4 complete and 16 partial responses were noted with an overall response rate of 64.5%, with 6 cases of stable and 5 cases of progressive disease. Toxicity was found to be manageable in that the only grade 3-4 side effects recorded were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, 8.5%; mucositis, 2.8%; leucopenia, 12.5%; anemia, 2.8% and AST/ALT, 2.8%. No cardiotoxicity was observed. In conclusion, weekly PLD plus paclitaxel appears to be a well-tolerated and effective approach for metastatic breast cancer patients with a high risk of cardiotoxicity.     

Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combined with gemcitabine as first-line treatment for metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer. Final results of a phase I/II trial

Doxorubicin and gemcitabine are active as single agents in breast cancer, have different mechanisms of action, and mainly have non-overlapping side effects. Dose-dependent doxorubicin-related cardiac toxicity is the principal limitation in the metastatic setting. This open, multicenter, single-arm phase I/II study assessed the safety and activity of gemcitabine in combination with non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet), a more cardiac-friendly anthracycline, in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer. We aimed to determine the optimal recommended dose (RD) of gemcitabine combined with Myocet in a population, with performance status >or=2 and LVEF >or=50%. A formal phase II study was performed afterwards. A total of 53 patients were recruited. Gemcitabine 900 mg/m(2) intravenously day 1 and 8 combined with Myocet 55 mg/m(2) intravenously day 1, every 21 days, was the final RD. The principal toxicity observed was hematological, and 48% of patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia. Other toxicities were mild and infrequent, including nausea and vomiting. There were no symptomatic cardiac events despite the fact that 36% of the patients had received prior treatment with adjuvant anthracyclines. Objective responses were observed in 51.1% of 47 evaluable patients (95% CI: 36-66%), including two complete response. In addition, 14 patients (29.8%) demonstrated stable disease. The combination of Myocet and gemcitabine at the RD is safe and has encouraging clinical activity in patients with advanced breast cancer, without apparent cardiac toxicity in anthracycline-pretreated patients. These data support further development of this combination.     

Combination of bevacizumab and 2-weekly pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as first-line therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. A multicenter,single-arm phase II trial (SAKK 24/06)

Background: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and bevacizumab are active agents in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We carried out a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of PLD and bevacizumab as first-line treatment in MBC patients.Methods: Bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) and PLD (20 mg/m²) were infused on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle for a maximum of six cycles. Thereafter, bevacizumab monotherapy was continued at the same dose until progression or toxicity. The primary objective was safety and tolerability, and the secondary objective was to evaluate efficacy of the combination.Results: Thirty-nine of 43 patients were assessable for the primary end point. Eighteen of 39 patients (46%, 95% confidence interval 30% to 63%) had a grade 3 toxicity. Sixteen (41%) had grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, one had grade 3 mucositis, and one severe cardiotoxicity. Secondary end point of overall response rate among 43 assessable patients was 21%.Conclusions: In this nonrandomized single-arm trial, the combination of bimonthly PLD and bevacizumab in locally recurrent and MBC patients demonstrated higher than anticipated toxicity while exhibiting only modest activity. Based on these results, we would not consider this combination for further investigation in this setting.     

The clinical benefit of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with conventional anthracyclines: a multicentre phase II trial

This study evaluates the clinical benefit of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), previously treated with conventional anthracyclines. Seventy-nine women with MBC previously treated with anthracyclines received PLD 50 mg m(-2) every 4 weeks. All patients were previously treated with chemotherapy and 30% of patients had > or =3 prior chemotherapies for metastatic disease. Patients were considered anthracycline resistant when they had disease progression on anthracycline therapy for MBC or within 6 months of adjuvant therapy. The overall clinical benefit rate (objective response+stable disease > or =24 weeks) was 24% (16.1% in patients with documented anthracycline resistance vs 29% in patients classified as having non-anthracycline-resistant disease). There was no difference with respect to the clinical benefit between patients who received PLD >12 months and those who received PLD < or =12 months since last anthracycline treatment for metastatic disease (clinical benefit 25 vs 24.1%, respectively). Median time to progression and overall survival were 3.6 and 12.3 months, respectively. The median duration of response was 12 months, and the median time to progression in patients with stable disease (any) was 9.5 months. Fourteen patients (17.7%) had a prolonged clinical benefit lasting > or =12 months. In conclusion, PLD was associated with an evident clinical benefit in anthracycline-pretreated patients with MBC.     

Phase III trial of liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide compared with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the efficacy and tolerability of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet) and epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: One hundred and sixty anthracycline-na?ve metastatic breast cancer patients were randomised to receive Myocet (M; 75 mg/m(2)) or epirubicin (E; 75 mg/m(2)) in combination with cyclophosphamide (C; 600 mg/m(2)), every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. OUTCOME MEASURES: Response (overall response = complete + partial response rates), time to disease progression, overall survival and cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction). RESULTS: Overall response rates were 46% and 39% for MC and EC treatment, respectively (P=0.42). MC was superior to EC with respect to median time to treatment failure (5.7 versus 4.4 months; P=0.01) and median time to disease progression (7.7 versus 5.6 months; P=0.02). Median survival times were 18.3 and 16.0 months for MC and EC, respectively (P=0.504). Unsurprisingly, given an equimolar comparison, neutropenia and stomatitis/mucositis were significantly more common in patients who received MC. However, there was less injection site toxicity with MC. Both treatments showed a low incidence of cardiotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Myocet appears to be an acceptable alternative to epirubicin as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer because it combines the dose-effect reliability of doxorubicin with the level of safety provided by epirubicin.     

Phase II study of single-agent pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (PLD) in metastatic breast cancer after first-line treatment failure

OBJECTIVES: Aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit and the toxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (n = 30) who failed a prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease received 45 mg/m2 pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) every 4 weeks following prophylactic administration of metoclopramide (10 mg) and dexamethasone (8 mg). RESULTS: 29 of 30 patients were assessed for clinical benefit and time to progression. All patients were assessed for toxicity and analysis of overall survival. 9 patients (31%) had a partial response, and 16 patients (55%) responded with stable disease, resulting in a clinical benefit rate of 86% (n = 25). Median time to progression was 4 months (95% CI: 2.8-5.2), median duration of response was 7 months (95% CI: 4.7-8.2), and median survival was 12 months (95% CI: 6.7-17.2). Skin toxicity was the most common adverse event (30%, all < or = grade 2). Other toxicities were remarkably low in occurrence. CONCLUSION: PLD is a well-tolerated, second-line monotherapy with a high rate of clinical benefit.