Acceptability of the human papillomavirus vaccine and reasons for non-vaccination among parents of adolescent sons

Routine administration of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine has been recommended for 11–12-year-old males since 2011, but coverage remains low. In a U.S. national sample of parents of 11–17-year-old males (n = 779), 78.6% of parents reported their sons had not received the HPV vaccine. The most common reason for non-vaccination (56.7%) was “My doctor or healthcare provider has not recommended it.” Parents citing only logistical reasons for non-vaccination (e.g., lack of recommendation, access, or education, n = 384) reported significantly higher vaccine acceptability than parents reporting a combination of attitudinal (e.g., concerns about vaccine safety or efficacy) and logistical barriers (n = 92), while parents citing only attitudinal barriers (n = 73) reported the lowest level of vaccine acceptability. In sum, many parents are willing but have not vaccinated sons due to logistical barriers, most commonly lack of healthcare provider recommendation. These findings have important implications for increasing HPV vaccination coverage among adolescent males.     

HPV vaccine for adolescent males: Acceptability to parents post-vaccine licensure

We examined mothers’ willingness to get their adolescent sons HPV vaccine. In December 2009, 2 months after approval of HPV vaccine for males, we surveyed a national sample of mothers with sons aged 9–18 (n = 406). More mothers were definitely or probably willing to get their sons HPV vaccine if the vaccine were free (47%) than if it cost $400 out of pocket (11%). The importance of HPV vaccine possibly protecting their sons’ future female partners from HPV-related disease was the strongest correlate of willingness. These findings are important to increasing acceptability to parents of HPV vaccine for their sons.     

HPV vaccination among adolescent males: Results from the National Immunization Survey-Teen

US guidelines provided a permissive recommendation for HPV vaccine for males in 2009, with an updated recommendation for routine vaccination in 2011. Data on vaccine uptake among males, however, remain sparse. We analyzed 2010–2011 data (collected mostly prior to the recommendation for routine vaccination) from the National Immunization Survey-Teen for a nationally representative sample of adolescent males ages 13–17 (n = 22,365). We examined HPV vaccine initiation (receipt of at least one dose based on healthcare provider records) as the primary outcome. Analyses used weighted logistic regression. HPV vaccine initiation increased from 1.4% in 2010 to 8.3% in 2011. Parents who reported receiving a healthcare provider recommendation to get their sons HPV vaccine were much more likely to have vaccinated sons (OR = 19.02, 95% CI: 14.36–25.19). Initiation was also higher among sons who were Hispanic (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.24–2.71) or who were eligible for the Vaccines for Children program (OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.01–2.31). Only 31.0% of parents with unvaccinated sons indicated their sons were “somewhat likely” or “very likely” to receive HPV vaccine in the next year. The most common main reasons for parents not intending to vaccinate were believing vaccination is not needed or not necessary (24.5%), not having received a provider recommendation (22.1%), and lack of knowledge (15.9%). HPV vaccination is low among adolescent males in the US, and provider recommendation for vaccination is likely key to improving vaccine uptake. Given the updated recommendation for routine vaccination and the changes in health insurance coverage that are likely to follow, continued efforts are needed to monitor HPV vaccination among males.     

HPV vaccine for teen boys: Dyadic analysis of parents' and sons' beliefs and willingness

ObjectiveParents and adolescents often decide together whether the child should receive human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. However, few studies have investigated the dyadic nature of beliefs that affect this process.MethodData came from the 2010 HPV Immunization in Sons (HIS) Study, a national sample of 412 parents and their adolescent sons. We conducted dyadic multivariate logistic regression to examine the relationships between parents' and sons' HPV vaccine beliefs and their willingness to have the son receive the vaccine.ResultsLess than half of parents and sons were willing to have the sons receive HPV vaccine (43% and 29%, respectively). Willing parents and sons anticipated greater regret if the son did not receive HPV vaccine but later contracted an HPV infection (parent odds ratio [OR] = 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24–2.40; son OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.04–2.19) (both p < .05). Lower concerns about side effects, such as pain and fainting, were also associated with willingness.ConclusionParents and sons were more willing to have the son receive HPV vaccine if they had higher anticipated regret about potential HPV infection and lower concerns about side effects. Communication campaigns may be able to target these beliefs to increase parents' and sons' willingness to seek HPV vaccination.     

Mothers' support for voluntary provision of HPV vaccine in schools

HPV vaccination rates among adolescents in the United States lag behind some other developed countries, many of which routinely offer the vaccine in schools. We sought to assess mothers’ willingness to have their adolescent daughters receive HPV vaccine at school. A national sample of mothers of adolescent females ages 11-14 completed our internet survey (response rate = 66%). The final sample (n = 496) excluded mothers who did not intend to have their daughters receive HPV vaccine in the next year. Overall, 67% of mothers who intended to vaccinate their daughters or had vaccinated their daughters reported being willing to have their daughters receive HPV vaccine at school. Mothers were more willing to allow their daughters to receive HPV vaccine in schools if they had not yet initiated the vaccine series for their daughters or resided in the Midwest or West (all p < .05). The two concerns about voluntary school-based provision of HPV vaccine that mothers most frequently cited were that their daughters’ doctors should keep track of her shots (64%) and that they wished to be present when their daughters were vaccinated (40%). Our study suggests that most mothers who support adolescent vaccination for HPV find school-based HPV vaccination an acceptable option. Ensuring communication of immunization records with doctors and allowing parents to be present during immunization may increase parental support.     

Do correlates of HPV vaccine initiation differ between adolescent boys and girls?

Background

Guidelines now recommend that adolescents routinely receive human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Because little is known about uptake among boys, we assessed HPV vaccine initiation in a population-based sample of adolescent boys and girls.

Methods

We analyzed weighted data from 751 parents who reported on an 11- to 17-year-old son or daughter for the 2010 North Carolina Child Health Assessment and Monitoring Program survey. Stratified multivariate logistic regression analyses identified correlates of HPV vaccine initiation separately for boys and girls.

Results

Only 14% of sons had received one or more doses of HPV vaccine compared to 44% of daughters (p < 0.01). For both sons and daughters, vaccine initiation correlated with age and having received meningococcal vaccine. Among sons, initiation of HPV vaccine was lower for those living in high income households (odds ratio [OR] = 0.22, 95% CI, 0.09–0.53) and higher for those whose race was neither white nor black (OR = 3.26, 95% CI, 1.06–10.04). When asked to give the main reason for not vaccinating their child against HPV, parents of unvaccinated sons were more likely than those of daughters to report not getting a provider's recommendation or not being aware that the vaccine was available for their child, but less likely to report concern about safety (p < 0.01). At least 86% of unvaccinated children had missed an opportunity to receive HPV vaccine.

Conclusions

HPV vaccine correlates and concerns varied for parents of boys and girls. To improve very low levels of uptake among boys, providers should recommend HPV vaccine concomitant with other adolescent vaccines.     

How do anticipated worry and regret predict seasonal influenza vaccination uptake among Chinese adults?

Objectives

To test two hypothesized models of how anticipated affect, cognitive risk estimate and vaccination intention might influence vaccination uptake against seasonal influenza.

Methods

The study collected baseline and follow-up data during the main influenza seasons (January–March) of 2009 and 2010, respectively, among 507 university students and staff of a university in Hong Kong. Following logistic regression to determine eligible variables, two mediation models of cognitive risk estimate, anticipated affect, vaccination intention and vaccination uptake against seasonal influenza were tested using structural equation modeling.

Results

Mediation analyses found that anticipated worry if not vaccinated influenced seasonal influenza vaccination uptake through its effects on either perceived probability of influenza infection (β = 0.45) or intention (β = 0.45) while anticipated regret if not vaccinated influenced vaccination uptake through its effect on intention (β = 0.45) only; anticipated regret if vaccinated impeded vaccination uptake indirectly through its effect on vaccination intention (β = −0.26) or directly (β = −0.20); perceived probability of influenza infection influenced vaccination uptake through its effect on intention (β = 0.20) or directly (β = 0.22); and finally, intention influenced vaccination uptake directly (β = 0.58).

Conclusion

The results suggest that anticipated affect seems to drive risk estimates related to seasonal influenza vaccination rather than vice versa and intention remains an important mediator of the associations of anticipated affect and cognitive risk estimate with vaccination uptake against seasonal influenza.     

Parents' Internet use for information about HPV vaccine

Purpose

The Internet is an increasingly common source of health-related information. We sought to examine associations between parents’ Internet information-seeking and their knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.

Methods

We interviewed parents within a year after approval of HPV vaccine for females and males. Participants were North Carolina parents with daughters ages 10–18 surveyed by telephone in Fall 2007 (n = 773); and a national sample of parents with sons ages 11–17 surveyed online in Fall 2010 (n = 115). We used multivariate regression to examine associations of past and intended Internet seeking for HPV vaccine information with knowledge and health belief model-related constructs.

Results

Among parents of daughters, having heard of HPV vaccine through the Internet (8%) was associated with higher HPV knowledge, perceived likelihood of HPV, and vaccination willingness, and with receiving a doctor's recommendation. It was also associated with lower perceived vaccine harms, uncertainty, and anticipated regret. Parents of sons who heard of HPV vaccine through the Internet (10%) perceived greater barriers to vaccination than parents who learned about HPV vaccine for males through other sources. Intended future Internet information-seeking among parents of daughters (69%) was more likely if they perceived a lower likelihood that their daughters would get HPV if they were vaccinated (all p < .05).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest a positive influence of accessing information on the Internet about HPV vaccine. It was associated with higher knowledge and mostly positive parental attitudes and beliefs.     

School-based vaccination of young US males: Impact of health beliefs on intent and first dose acceptance

Little is known about adolescent males and their parents with respect to intent and first dose uptake of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine outside of primay care settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential predictors of parental intent to vaccinate (study was conducted in November 2010–December 2012) and of first dose uptake of HPV vaccine among a sample of young adolescent males, 11–15 years of age, who received care at a school-based health center (SBHC). We also examined intent as a potential mediator of the relationships between predictors (health beliefs and perceived spousal agreement) and vaccination. Slightly more than half (n = 135 of 249) of parents reported an intention to vaccinate and 28% (n = 69) of males received their first dose of the HPV vaccine. Two of three health beliefs were significantly associated with both intention and uptake as was perceived spousal agreement. We found intention to vaccinate was a partial mediatator between the perceived benefits of HPV vaccine and first dose acceptance. We also determined that intent was a strong mediator between both general immunization benefits and perceived spousal agreement and first dose uptake. While vaccine uptake was lower than expected, particularly considering that many barriers to vaccine initiation were eliminated because of the SBHC setting, this rate is higher than in traditional settings. After controlling for intent, only perceived benefits of the HPV vaccine remained a significant predictor of first dose acceptance.     

Longitudinal Predictors of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Among a National Sample of Adolescent Males

Objectives. We conducted a longitudinal study to examine human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake among male adolescents and to identify vaccination predictors.Methods. In fall 2010 and 2011, a national sample of parents with sons aged 11 to 17 years (n = 327) and their sons (n = 228) completed online surveys. We used logistic regression to identify predictors of HPV vaccination that occurred between baseline and follow-up.Results. Only 2% of sons had received any doses of HPV vaccine at baseline, with an increase to 8% by follow-up. About 55% of parents who had ever received a doctor’s recommendation to get their sons HPV vaccine did vaccinate between baseline and follow-up, compared with only 1% of parents without a recommendation. Fathers (odds ratio = 0.29; 95% confidence interval = 0.09, 0.80) and non-Hispanic White parents (odds ratio = 0.29; 95% confidence interval = 0.11, 0.76) were less likely to have vaccinated sons. Willingness to get sons HPV vaccine decreased from baseline to follow-up among parents (P < .001) and sons (P = .003).Conclusions. Vaccination against HPV remained low in our study and willingness to vaccinate may be decreasing. Physician recommendation and education about HPV vaccine for males may be key strategies for improving vaccination.Quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine against types 6, 11, 16, and 18 is approved to protect against genital warts (caused mostly by HPV types 6 and 111) and anal cancer (caused mostly by HPV types 16 and 182) in males.3 About 4% of men in the United States report a previous diagnosis of genital warts,4 and about 2250 new cases of anal cancer occur annually among males in the United States.5 Given the high levels of HPV concordance among sexual partners,6 vaccinating males may also have indirect health benefits for their partners.7 United States guidelines began including HPV vaccine for males in October 2009.8 The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices first provided a permissive recommendation, recommending the 3-dose quadrivalent vaccine series for males aged 9 to 26 years but not making it part of their routine vaccination schedule.8 In October 2011, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices updated its stance on HPV vaccine for males and recommended routine vaccination of boys aged 11 to 12 years with catch-up vaccination for males aged 13 to 21 years.9 The updated recommendation continues to allow HPV vaccine to be given to males aged as young as 9 years and up to 26 years.9Although numerous studies have examined HPV vaccine uptake among females,10 data on HPV vaccine uptake among males are sparse. Despite mostly encouraging early levels of parental acceptability of the vaccine for males,11–13 initial estimates found that only about 2% of male adolescents in the United States had received any doses of HPV vaccine by the end of 2010.14,15 Recent data suggest that this increased to about 8% by the end of 2011.16 We are not aware of any studies that have examined predictors of vaccine uptake among males.Our study addresses several important gaps in the existing literature. We provide the first longitudinal examination of HPV vaccination among males and identify predictors of vaccine uptake. In doing so, we used data from both parents and their adolescent sons because many adolescents are involved in vaccination decisions.17 We also examined longitudinal changes in vaccine acceptability among parents and sons and parents’ reasons for not getting their sons HPV vaccine, because these data may provide valuable insight about future HPV vaccine uptake among males.     

Acceptability and uptake of female adolescent HPV vaccination in Hong Kong: A survey of mothers and adolescents

Background

Organized population-based HPV vaccination programs can be effective in reducing the burden of cervical cancer, especially in the absence of a comprehensive cervical screening program (e.g. Hong Kong). Assessment of vaccine acceptability is important when evaluating the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of such vaccination programs.

Methods

To provide a more representative and updated assessment on the acceptability of female adolescent HPV vaccination in Hong Kong, we conducted surveys in 2008 among 1022 mothers with daughters aged ≤18 years through random digit-dialing telephone interviewing and 2167 schoolgirls aged 11–18 years using two-stage stratified cluster sampling. We conducted the maternal survey again in 2012 with an independent group of 1005 mothers.

Results

In 2008, 2.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8–3.2%) of the recruited schoolgirls reported having received HPV vaccination. In 2012, the mothers reported that 9.1% (7.0–11.6%) of their daughters who were in the same age range (11–18 years) as the schoolgirls had been vaccinated (p < 0.01). Regarding acceptability, 27.5% (24.8–30.4%) and 37.6% (34.5–40.8%) of the mothers were willing to have their daughters vaccinated at market price in 2008 and 2012 (p < 0.01), respectively. 27.1% (25.2–29.1%) of the schoolgirls were willing to receive HPV vaccination at market price in 2008. The willingness to pay for full-course vaccination among mothers had a median of US$128/HK$1000 (50% central range = US$64–192/HK$500–1500), i.e. substantially lower than the current market price.

Conclusions

The gap between acceptability and actual uptake of HPV vaccination among adolescent girls suggested that coverage is likely to be low without an organized HPV vaccination program, although the difference might be partially attributed to the possibility that at the time of the interview female adolescents who were willing to be vaccinated had not yet taken action. Policymakers should devise tailored, targeted and efficient vaccination strategies to achieve universal coverage for an effectively organized HPV vaccination program.     

HPV vaccination among lesbian and bisexual women: Findings from a national survey of young adults

Background

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and associated cervical disease are common among all women, regardless of sexual identity, yet limited research has examined HPV vaccination among lesbian and bisexual women.

Methods

A national sample of lesbian and bisexual women ages 18–26 (n = 543) completed our online survey during Fall 2013. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify correlates of HPV vaccine initiation (receipt of at least 1 dose) and completion (receipt of all 3 recommended doses among initiators).

Results

Overall, 45% of respondents had initiated HPV vaccine and 70% of initiators reported completing the series. HPV vaccine initiation was higher among respondents who were students, had received a healthcare provider's recommendation, perceived greater positive social vaccination norms, or anticipated greater regret if they did not get vaccinated and later got HPV. Initiation was lower among those who perceived greater HPV vaccine harms or greater barriers to getting the vaccine (all p < .05). HPV vaccine completion was higher among initiators who had a college degree while it was lower among those who perceived a greater likelihood of acquiring HPV or who anticipated greater regret if they got the vaccine and fainted (all p < .05). Among HPV vaccine initiators who had not yet completed the series, about half (47%) intended to get the remaining doses.

Conclusions

Many lesbian and bisexual women are not getting vaccinated against HPV. Healthcare provider recommendations and women's health beliefs may be important leverage points for increasing vaccination among this population.     

Well-woman visit of mothers and human papillomavirus vaccine intent and uptake among their 9–17 year old children

Objective

To examine the association between attending a well-woman clinic in the prior 2 years and obtaining the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for their 9–17-year-old child.

Methods

Women (n = 1256) who attended reproductive health clinics during September 2011 to February 2013 and had ≥1 children 9–17 years of age were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire containing questions on demographic characteristics, prior well-woman visits, HPV awareness, and HPV vaccine intent and uptake among their adolescent children.

Results

Nearly 78% of women reported having undergone a well-woman visit during the past 2 years. Bivariate analysis showed that the HPV vaccine initiation (23.9% vs. 14.0%, P = .004) and completion (13.6% vs. 6.7%, P = .011) among 9–17 daughters differed between mothers who did or did not have a well-woman visit during the past 2 years. However, intent to vaccinate them (47.2% vs. 53.3%, P = .173) did not differ between these two groups. With regard to 9–17 year old sons, vaccine initiation (10.1% vs. 9.6%, P = .871), completion (4.6% vs. 2.4%, P = .273) and intent to vaccinate (47.3% vs. 52.1%, P = .311) did not differ between these two groups. Multivariable logistic regression analyses confirmed the findings of these bivariate analyses after adjusting for confounder variables.

Conclusion

The well-woman visit may be a missed opportunity for physicians to educate their patients about the benefits of HPV vaccination for their adolescent children in general and sons in particular. Intervention studies are warranted to assess the benefits of using this setting to improve HPV vaccine uptake in the US.     

Perceptions and acceptability of HPV vaccination among parents of young adolescents: A multicenter national survey in China

Prophylactic HPV vaccines target young adolescents to prevent related cervical lesions and even genital warts prior to onset of sexual activity. Parental consent is often essential for success of vaccination program for this age group. We conducted a national multicenter study to explore the acceptability of HPV vaccination among parents of young adolescents and associated factors in relevant parent decision making in China. A total of 2899 parents of young adolescents (11–17 years) participated in the survey between November 28, 2011 and May 9, 2012, but four were excluded from analysis because of inconsistencies in their given information in the questionnaire. Mothers accounted for 62.8% of the parent participants. The mean age of the parents was 40.40 (standard deviation, 4.68) years. Only 36.2% of the parents accepted the vaccine for their children. Knowledge about HPV and HPV vaccine was a positive correlate with HPV vaccination acceptability (P_trend = 0.003). Grade of child (P_trend = 0.015), prior vaccination experience outside the National Expanded Program on Immunization (OR: 1.43; 95%CI: 1.19–1.72), fear of cervical cancer and/or genital warts (OR: 2.47; 95%CI: 2.00–3.05), and prior consultation regarding HPV vaccine information (OR: 2.35; 95%CI: 1.57–3.52) were also positively associated with higher HPV vaccine acceptability. The acceptability was lower in mothers (OR: 0.45; 95%CI: 0.37–0.54) and who had better education (P_trend = 0.009). 57.3% of the parents agreed that the most appropriate venue for HPV vaccination was the local center for disease prevention and control. In conclusion, our study indicates a low acceptability of HPV vaccination among parents of young adolescents in China. We understand there are many challenges in implementing HPV vaccination program. Our findings will serve as valuable references for future HPV vaccination policies and campaigns after HPV vaccines are approved in China.     

Intent to receive HPV vaccine and reasons for not vaccinating among unvaccinated adolescent and young women: findings from the 2006-2008 National Survey of Family Growth

Background and purpose

HPV vaccine coverage for females has increased in the U.S., although challenges to achieving high coverage remain. HPV vaccine coverage continues to lag behind that of other routinely recommended adolescent vaccines and these gaps in coverage are widening. To inform strategies to improve uptake, we explore correlates of vaccine intention and describe reasons for refusing HPV vaccination among unvaccinated females in a nationally representative sample of adolescents and young adults during early stages of HPV vaccine availability.

Methods

In 2007–2008, 1243 females aged 15–24 years were asked about HPV vaccination in the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). For unvaccinated women (n = 955), we evaluated demographic and sexual behavior correlates of likelihood to receive the vaccine in the next 12 months in bivariate and multivariable analyses by age. Correlates to the main reasons for foregoing vaccination are described.

Results

A minority (42.5%) of unvaccinated respondents said they intended to receive HPV vaccine in the next 12 months: 37.6% of adolescents (15–19 years) and 42.0% of young adults (20–24 years). Sexually experienced women were more than twice as likely as non-sexually experienced women to intend to receive HPV vaccine (15–19 years: aOR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.15, 4.94; 20–24 years: aOR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.08, 4.33). Having health insurance was associated with being likely to receive HPV vaccine among adolescents. Hispanic young adults were more likely than non-Hispanic Whites to be likely to receive HPV vaccine. The belief of not being at risk for HPV and institutional barriers were the two most commonly cited reasons for foregoing vaccination.Among unvaccinated women who did not intend to get vaccinated, respondents who never had sex were more likely to report not being at risk as the main reason for not needing the vaccine compared to women with sexual experience (44.5 vs. 24.4%) but this finding was only marginally significant in our limited sample.

Conclusion

In the first years immediately post-licensure of an HPV vaccine, the majority of unvaccinated women indicated that they were unlikely to seek vaccination. Intent to receive the HPV vaccine is tied to sexual experience and most women who do not intend to get vaccinated and have never had sex believe they are not at risk of HPV or do not need an HPV vaccine. These findings highlight the need to better communicate information regarding lifetime risk for HPV and the importance of receiving HPV vaccine prior to sexual initiation. These findings should inform strategies to increase vaccine uptake.     

HPV vaccine acceptance among adolescent males and their parents in two suburban pediatric practices

PurposeTo measure HPV vaccine acceptance among unvaccinated adolescent males and parents and correlate acceptance with knowledge, awareness, and personal experience.MethodsAdolescent males ages 11–21 years old and their parents completed questionnaires measuring attitudes and knowledge about HPV vaccination and personal experience. Acceptance was defined as wanting the vaccine and conditional acceptance as wanting the vaccine if it would protect against genital warts or cervical cancer.ResultsAdolescent (n = 154) and parent (n = 121) vaccine acceptance was low (16% and 34%, respectively); however, conditional acceptance was higher. While adolescents had similar conditional acceptance for a vaccine against genital warts and cervical cancer, parents reported higher conditional acceptance for protection against genital warts. Independent predictors of acceptance included personal experience and demographic variables.ConclusionsHPV vaccine acceptance among adolescents and parents was low. Conditional acceptance levels highlight the importance of education about a few important benefits of HPV vaccination, which may increase vaccination rates.     

Human papillomavirus vaccine uptake among males 11–26 years in United States: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011–2012

Anogenital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the leading sexually transmitted infection in the United States. In October 2011, the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (HPV4) was recommended for males in the U.S. We analyzed a subsample of 11–26 year old (N = 1012) males, from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey 2011–2012 dataset, to examine HPV vaccine uptake. The initiation rates in the 11–17 years and the 18–26 years age-groups were 10.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8.09–16.6%) and 5.5% (95%CI: 3.1–9.5%) respectively. The corresponding HPV vaccine completion rates were 39.3% (16.7–67.7%) for the 11–17 year old males and 59.1% (37.2–77.6) for the 18–26-year-old males. Despite a slight increase, HPV vaccine uptake remained low among males. These findings can help in HPV vaccination policy in the United States, with a focus on informational messages directed toward young males and their parents in order to increase uptake of HPV vaccine.     

Correlates of HPV vaccination among adolescent females from Appalachia and reasons why their parents do not intend to vaccinate

Limited research has examined HPV vaccination in Appalachia, a region with cervical cancer disparities. We analyzed 2008–2010 National Immunization Survey-Teen data for adolescent females ages 13–17 from Appalachia (n = 1951) to identify correlates of HPV vaccination and reasons why their parents do not intend to vaccinate. HPV vaccine initiation was 40.8%, completion was 27.7%, and follow-through was 67.8%. Vaccination outcomes tended to be higher among females who were older, had visited their healthcare provider in the last year, or whose parents reported receiving a provider recommendation to vaccinate. Only 41.0% of parents with unvaccinated daughters intended to vaccinate in the next year. The most common reasons for not intending to vaccinate were believing vaccination is not needed or not necessary (21.5%) and lack of knowledge (18.5%). Efforts to reduce missed opportunities for vaccination at healthcare visits and address reasons why parents are not vaccinating may help increase HPV vaccination in Appalachia     

Acceptance of the HPV vaccine among women,parents, community leaders,and healthcare providers in Ohio Appalachia

To assess HPV vaccine acceptability, focus groups of women (18–26 years), parents, community leaders, and healthcare providers were conducted throughout Ohio Appalachia. Themes that emerged among the 23 focus groups (n = 114) about the HPV vaccine were: barriers (general health and vaccine specific), lack of knowledge (cervical cancer and HPV), cultural attitudes, and suggestions for educational materials and programs. Important Appalachian attitudes included strong family ties, privacy, conservative views, and lack of trust of outsiders to the region. There are differences in HPV vaccine acceptability among different types of community members highlighting the need for a range of HPV vaccine educational materials/programs to be developed that are inclusive of the Appalachian culture.