Assessment of safety and immunogenicity of two different lots of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine manufactured using small and large scale manufacturing process

Background

Hib vaccine can be easily incorporated in EPI vaccination schedule as the immunization schedule of Hib is similar to that of DTP vaccine. To meet the global demand of Hib vaccine, SIIL scaled up the Hib conjugate manufacturing process. This study was conducted in Indian infants to assess and compare the immunogenicity and safety of DTwP-HB + Hib (Pentavac^®) vaccine of SIIL manufactured at large scale with the ‘same vaccine’ manufactured at a smaller scale.

Methods

720 infants aged 6-8 weeks were randomized (2:1 ratio) to receive 0.5 ml of Pentavac^® vaccine from two different lots one produced at scaled up process and the other at a small scale process. Serum samples obtained before and at one month after the 3rd dose of vaccine from both the groups were tested for IgG antibody response by ELISA and compared to assess non-inferiority.

Results

Neither immunological interference nor increased reactogenicity was observed in either of the vaccine groups. All infants developed protective antibody titres to diphtheria, tetanus and Hib disease. For hepatitis B antigen, one child from each group remained sero-negative. The response to pertussis was 88% in large scale group vis-à-vis 87% in small scale group. Non-inferiority was concluded for all five components of the vaccine. No serious adverse event was reported in the study.

Conclusions

The scale up vaccine achieved comparable response in terms of the safety and immunogenicity to small scale vaccine and therefore can be easily incorporated in the routine childhood vaccination programme.     

Response of MUTZ-3 dendritic cells to the different components of the Haemophilus influenzae type B conjugate vaccine: towards an in vitro assay for vaccine immunogenicity

Potency testing is mandatory for vaccine registration and batch release. Due to various limitations to in vivo potency testing, there is need for relevant in vitro alternatives. These alternative tests should preferably comprise cells from the target (human) species. The whole suite of immune responses to vaccination that occur in vivo in humans cannot be tested in vitro using a single cell type. Even so, dendritic cells (DC) form an important candidate cell type since they are pivotal in inducing and orchestrating immune responses. Cell lines are preferred over ex vivo cells for reasons of safety, accessibility, and reproducibility. In this first feasibility study we used the human cell line MUTZ-3, because it most closely resembles ex vivo human DC, and compared its response to monocyte-derived DC (moDC).Haemophilus influenzae type B (HiB) vaccine was chosen because its components exert different effects in vivo: while the HiB antigen, polyribosyl ribitol phosphate (PRP) fails to induce sufficient protection in children below 2 years of age, conjugation of this polysaccharide antigen to outer membrane protein (OMP) of Neisseria meningitides, results in sufficient protection. Effects of PRP, OMP, conjugated PRP-OMP, and adjuvanted vaccine (PedVax HiB), on cytokine production and surface marker expression were established. PRP induced no effects on cytokine production and the effect on surface marker expression was limited to a minor decrease in CD209 (DC-SIGN). In both MUTZ-3 and moDC, OMP induced the strongest response both in cytokine production and surface marker expression. Compared to OMP alone conjugated PRP-OMP generally induced a weaker response in cytokine production and surface marker expression. The effects of PedVax HiB were comparable to conjugated PRP-OMP. While moDC showed a larger dynamic range than MUTZ-3 DC, these cells also showed considerable variability between donors, with MUTZ-3 DC showing a consistent response between the replicate assays. In our view, this makes MUTZ-3 DC the cells of choice. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that the MUTZ-3 DC assay allows discrimination between compounds with different immunogenicity. The potential of this cell line as (part of) an in vitro immunogenicity assay should be further explored.     

A Phase I,randomized, open-label study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an enterovirus 71 vaccine

Background

Large-scale outbreaks of enterovirus 71 (EV71) infections have occurred in Asia-Pacific regions. Severe complications include encephalitis and poliomyelitis-like paralysis, cardiopulmonary collapse, and death, necessitating an effective vaccine against EV71.

Methods

In this randomized Phase I study, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated alum-adjuvanted EV71 whole-virus vaccine produced on Vero cell cultures. Sixty healthy volunteers aged 20–60 years received two doses of vaccine, administered 21 days apart. Each dose contained either 5 μg of EV71 antigen with 150 μg of adjuvant (Group A05) or 10 μg of EV71 antigen with 300 μg of adjuvant (Group B10). Serologic analysis was performed at baseline, day 21, and day 42.

Results

There were no serious adverse events. Mild injection site pain and myalgia were the most common adverse events with either vaccine formulation. The immunogenicity data showed that 90% of vaccine recipients have a 4-fold or greater increase in neutralization antibody titers (NT) after the first dose, without a further increase in NT after the second dose. The seroconversion rates on day 21 and day 42 were 86.7% and 93.1% respectively, in Group A05, and 92.9% and 96.3%, respectively, in Group B10. Thus, 5 μg and 10 μg of the EV71 vaccine can induce a remarkable immune response in healthy adults after only the first vaccination.

Conclusion

The 5 μg and 10 μg adjuvanted EV71 vaccines are generally safe and immunogenic in healthy adults. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01268787).     

Lot-to-lot consistency,safety and immunogenicity of 3 lots of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine: results from a phase III randomized,multicenter study in infants

BackgroundVaccination against Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) is included in routine pediatric immunization schedule in the United States. Previous vaccine shortages have created the need for additional options for Hib vaccination.MethodsThis phase III, randomized, multi-centered study (NCT01000974) evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a monovalent tetanus toxoid-conjugate Hib vaccine (Hib-TT) compared to a monovalent (Hib-TT control) and a combination Hib-TT vaccine. We hierarchically assessed lot-to-lot consistency of 3 Hib-TT lots and non-inferiority of Hib-TT to Hib-TT control. We co-administered routine pediatric vaccines with Hib-TT vaccines at 2, 4, 6 months (primary vaccination) and 15–18 months of age (booster vaccination). We recorded adverse events (AEs) for 4 (solicited) and 31 days (unsolicited) post-vaccination and serious AEs (SAEs) throughout the study.ResultsOf 4009 enrolled children, 3086 completed booster phase. Lot-to-lot consistency was not demonstrated. The study met statistical criteria for non-inferiority of Hib-TT to Hib-TT control in terms of immune responses to Hib and co-administered vaccines’ antigens, but not in terms of participants achieving post-primary vaccination anti-PRP levels ≥1 µg/mL. Because of the hierarchical nature of the objectives, non-inferiority could not be established. In all groups, 92.5–96.7% and 99.6–100% of participants achieved anti-PRP levels ≥0.15 µg/mL, while 78.3–89.8% and 97.9–99.1% had anti-PRP levels ≥1 µg/mL, post-primary and post-booster vaccination, respectively. Immune responses to co-administered vaccines and reported incidence of AEs were comparable among groups. We recorded SAEs for 107/2963 (3.6%), 24/520 (4.6%), and 21/520 (4.0%) children post-primary vaccination, and 29/2337 (1.2%), 4/435 (0.9%), and 2/400 (0.5%) children post-booster vaccination with Hib-TT, Hib-TT control and combination Hib-TT vaccine, respectively; 6/5330 (0.1%) SAEs in the Hib-TT groups were considered vaccine-related.ConclusionHib-TT induced seroprotective antibody concentrations in the majority of participants and was well-tolerated when co-administered with routine pediatric vaccines according to a 3 + 1 schedule.     

Invasive Haemophilus influenzae disease: an ecological study of sociodemographic risk factors before and after the introduction of Hib conjugate vaccine

This study examines the impact of H. influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccine on sociodemographic risk factors for invasive H. influenzae disease in the 2 years before and immediately after the introduction of Hib conjugate vaccine. An ecological study design was used and cases were identified using active surveillance employing several surveillance systems. The study population comprised all children aged <5 years resident in the West Midlands, an English health region, with laboratory confirmed invasive disease 2 years before (1990–1992) and 2 years after (1992–1994) the introduction of Hib conjugate vaccine. Selected sociodemographic variables derived from the UK census were obtained for all census enumeration districts in the region. Each variable was then ranked and divided into six categories. Linear associations between disease rates and sociodemographic variables were examined. Overall, there was a significant reduction in the incidence of invasive H. influenzae disease. In the pre-conjugate vaccine era there were trends of decreasing disease incidence with increasing child population density (p = 0.012) and total population density (p = 0.0023). In the post-conjugate vaccine period, total population density (p = 0.0275) remained significant and a trend of increasing disease incidence with increasing population mobility (p = 0.0012) was seen. Although Hib conjugate vaccine has resulted in a dramatic reduction in disease incidence changes in sociodemographic risk factors were identified in the post-conjugate vaccine period, particularly population mobility. Our results may have implications for current and future vaccine strategies.     

Safety and immunogenicity of three different formulations of a liquid hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated poliovirus-Haemophilus influenzae b conjugate-hepatitis B vaccine at 2, 4, 6 and 12-14 months of age

The current recommended infant vaccination schedules require many injections at multiple sites, which increase stress for infants and parents and may create challenges to vaccination compliance. Therefore, combination vaccines, which reduce the number of injections at each medical visit, can be an essential method to improve compliance. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and immunogenicity of an investigational, liquid, hexavalent, pediatric vaccine at 2, 4, 6, and 12-14 months of age. In this multicenter, open-label controlled study, 756 infants were randomized in approximately equal numbers to receive 0.5 mL intramuscular dose of diptheria-tetanus-pertussis-polio-Haemophilus influenzae type b + hepatitis B vaccine, or 1 of 3 double-blind investigational formulations. All formulations included a hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) concentration of 10 μg/0.5 mL. The three hexavalent vaccine formulations used in this study contained either Hib polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) conjugate component (tetanus toxoid [PRP-T, 12 μg] or Neisseria meningitidis outer membrane protein complex [PRP-OPMC, 3 μg or 6 μg]): a minimum acceptable postdose 3 antibody response rate for each antigen was defined by the lower limit of a 95% confidence interval exceeding a prespecified target. Rates of adverse events (AEs) were similar among groups, with a trend for increased solicited vaccine-related injection-site reactions (pain, erythema, swelling) with increasing PRP-OMPC dose. No serious vaccine-related AEs were reported in the investigational groups. Both PRP-OMPC formulations met prespecified acceptability criteria for all antigens: PRP, HBsAg, pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus and poliovirus. The PRP-T formulation met the acceptability criterion for antibody responses to all antigens other than PRP at postdose 3. Postdose 4 responses were adequate for all antigens in all formulations. All vaccine formulations were well-tolerated. Both PRP-OMPC formulations met prespecified immunogenicity criteria of PRP-OMPC evaluation.     

A phase 3, randomized,double-blind study to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of 3 lots of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in pneumococcal vaccine-naive adults 18 through 49 years of age

IntroductionIntroduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs), including the 13-valent PCV (PCV13), has considerably reduced pneumococcal disease burden. However, additional serotypes not in PCV13 continue to present a substantial disease burden. The 20-valent PCV (PCV20) was developed to expand protection against pneumococcal disease beyond PCV13. As part of the phase 3 clinical development program, the current study assessed consistency of immune responses across 3 lots of PCV20 and described the safety profile of PCV20.MethodsThis phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind study of pneumococcal vaccine-naive adults 18–49 years of age randomized 1710 participants in a 2:2:2:1 ratio to receive 1 of 3 lots of PCV20 or PCV13. Immunogenicity was assessed through serotype-specific opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) titers before and approximately 1 month (28–42 days) after vaccination. Reported local reactions within 10 days, systemic events within 7 days, adverse events (AEs) within 30 days, and serious AEs (SAEs) and newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions (NDCMCs) within 6 months after vaccination were evaluated.ResultsEquivalence in immune responses (OPA geometric mean titers) for all 20 vaccine serotypes was demonstrated across the 3 PCV20 lots. Robust responses, assessed by OPA geometric mean fold rises, percentage of participants achieving ≥4-fold rises, and percentage of participants with OPA titers ≥lower limit of quantitation, were observed after PCV20. Reported rates of local reactions, systemic events, and AEs were similar between the pooled PCV20 lots and PCV13; most events were mild or moderate. Reported rates of SAEs and NDCMCs were low and similar between the PCV20 and PCV13 groups.ConclusionsThree different lots of PCV20 demonstrated robust and consistent immunogenicity. The safety and tolerability of PCV20 was acceptable and similar to that of PCV13. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03828617).     

The immunogenicity and safety of different formulations of a novel Staphylococcus aureus vaccine (V710): results of two Phase I studies

Merck V710 is a novel vaccine that contains the highly conserved Staphylococcus aureus iron surface determinant B (IsdB) protein. V710 has induced positive immune responses in healthy subjects. The purpose of the two studies described herein was to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of two different formulations of V710. Both studies were randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trials. Study 1 compared liquid, aluminum-adjuvanted V710 (30 μg) with liquid, non-adjuvanted V710 (30 μg) in a 1:1 ratio in 64 healthy adults (18-70 years). Study 2 compared non-adjuvanted lyophilized V710 (60 μg) with saline placebo in a 4:1 ratio in 51 healthy adults (18-80 years). Blood was collected at screening and up to Day 360 postvaccination in Study 1, and at screening and up to Day 84 postvaccination in Study 2. Sera were analyzed for IsdB-specific antibodies using a total IgG assay. The primary endpoints in Study 1 were the proportion of patients with a positive immune response (≥2-fold rise in IsdB-specific IgG antibody level) the geometric mean concentration (GMC), and the geometric mean-fold rise (GMFR), all from baseline at Day 14. The primary endpoint in Study 2 was the GMFR in IsdB-specific IgG antibody concentration from baseline at Day 14. In Study 1, 84.4% responded in the adjuvanted V710 group, and 71.9% in the non-adjuvanted V710 group. The GMC was 115.4 μg/mL in the adjuvanted group and 99.1 μg/mL in the nonadjuvanted group. The GMFR in antibody concentration in the group receiving aluminum-adjuvanted V710 was 4.5 and the GMFR in the group receiving non-adjuvanted V710 was 4.0. In Study 2, the GMFR in antibody concentration in the V710 group was 5.3, and 80.5% had a positive immune response. None responded in the placebo group. Positive immune response was seen in the active treatment groups over the full duration of each study. There were no serious adverse experiences (AE) in either study, and no patients discontinued due to an AE. There were no clinically meaningful differences in AEs between groups in either study. In conclusion, V710, both with and without aluminum adjuvant, and in both liquid and lyophilized formulations, was immunogenic within 14 days of vaccination. All treatments showed similar safety profiles.     

A first-in-human phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the candidate tuberculosis vaccine MVA85A-IMX313, administered to BCG-vaccinated adults

IntroductionThere is an urgent need for a new and effective tuberculosis vaccine because BCG does not sufficiently prevent pulmonary disease. IMX313 is a novel carrier protein designed to improve cellular and humoral immunity. MVA85A-IMX313 is a novel vaccine candidate designed to boost immunity primed by bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) that has been immunogenic in pre-clinical studies. This is the first evaluation of IMX313 delivered as MVA85A-IMX313 in humans.MethodsIn this phase 1, open-label first-in-human trial, 30 healthy previously BCG-vaccinated adults were enrolled into three treatment groups and vaccinated with low dose MVA85A-IMX313 (group A), standard dose MVA85A-IMX313 (group B), or MVA85A (group C). Volunteers were followed up for 6 months for safety and immunogenicity assessment.ResultsThe majority of adverse events were mild and there were no vaccine-related serious AEs. Both MVA85A-IMX313 and MVA85A induced a significant increase in IFN-γ ELISpot responses. There were no significant differences between the Ag85A ELISpot and intracellular cytokine responses between the two study groups B (MVA85A-IMX313) and C (MVA85A) at any time point post-vaccination.ConclusionMVA85A-IMX313 was well tolerated and immunogenic. There was no significant difference in the number of vaccine-related, local or systemic adverse reactions between MVA85A and MVA85A-IMX313 groups. The mycobacteria-specific cellular immune responses induced by MVA85A-IMX313 were not significantly different to those detected in the MVA85A group. In light of this encouraging safety data, further work to improve the potency of molecular adjuvants like IMX313 is merited.This trial was registered on clinicatrials.gov ref. NCT01879163.     

A phase 1 randomized open-label clinical study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a novel recombinant hepatitis E vaccine

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability for variable dosages of a novel hepatitis E vaccine p179.MethodsThe randomized open-label parallel control phase 1 clinical trial enrolled 120 eligible participants aged 16–65 years in Jiangsu Province, China. The experimental groups were randomized to receive different dosages of 20 μg, 30 μg, and 40 μg Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) p179 vaccines, with the 30 μg HEV vaccine p239 Hecolin as control, and vaccinated at 0, 1 and 6 month intervals. Participants were observed for solicited local and systemic adverse reactions (ARs) occurring within 7 days after each vaccination, and any serious adverse events (SAEs) occurring within 6 months post-vaccination. Blood samples were collected from participants 3 days before and after each injection, to determine the blood routine and serum biochemical indexes.ResultsThe solicited local ARs incidence in experimental groups were significantly lower than that of the control group (P = 0.027). The difference between solicited total and systemic ARs incidence of experimental groups and the control group were not significant (P > 0.05). Similar patterns were observed when the analyses were performed on the group having ARs of varying grades and symptoms. All changes in blood biochemical indexes and routine blood tests before and after different vaccinations were mild (grade 1) or moderate (grade 2), and the difference in experimental groups and the control group were not statistically significant. No vaccine related SAEs occurred in any of the subjects during the study.ConclusionThree different dosages of HEV p179 vaccine were deemed safe and well tolerated. No vaccine-associated SAEs were identified, and the 30 μg dosage formulation was selected for further investigation for efficacy.Clinical trials registration number: 2012L01657.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a Haemophilus influenzae B (Hib)-hepatitis B vaccine with a modified process hepatitis B component administered with concomitant pneumococcal conjugate vaccine to infants

Background

A hepatitis B vaccine was manufactured with a modified process (mpHBV) that incorporated double the usual amount of phosphate. Following a study in young adults, the mpHBV was evaluated in infants in a combination hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae B vaccine (mpHBV-Hib).

Methods

The mpHBV-Hib was compared with the licensed bivalent HBV-Hib vaccine Comvax™ for immunogenicity and safety. Both vaccines contained 5 μg/0.5 mL of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and 7.5 μg/0.5 mL of PRP-OMPC (polyribosylribitol phosphate outer membrane protein complex). A total of 543 infants were randomized 1:1 to receive either vaccine at 2, 4 and 12 months of age. A pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) was given concomitantly. Immunogenicity was assessed at 1-month post-dose 3.

Results

Seroprotection rates [% subjects with anti-hepatitis B surface antigen antibody titers (anti-HBs) ≥10 mIU/mL)] were 100% and 99% for mpHBV-Hib and the licensed control (Comvax™), respectively. Anti-HBs geometric mean titers (GMTs) were 4204 (95% CI, 3411-5182) and 1683 (95% CI, 1350-2099) mIU/mL, respectively. Anti-PRP seroprotection rates (SPR) at ≥0.15 μg/mL and at ≥1.0 μg/mL were 97% and 94%, respectively, for mpHBV-Hib and 96% and 92%, respectively, for the control. Anti-PRP GMTs were 7.1 μg/mL for mpHBV-Hib and 8.0 μg/mL for the control. Reactogenicity of the two vaccines was similar.

Conclusions

The mpHBV in combination with Hib and with co-administered PCV was highly immunogenic. The safety profile of mpHBV-Hib was comparable to the licensed control. Both the control and mpHBV-Hib met acceptability criteria for seroprotection rates to hepatitis B, with higher anti-HBs GMTs noted for mpHBV-Hib.     

Development and technology transfer of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines for developing countries

This paper describes the development of a Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccine at the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment/Netherlands Vaccine Institute (RIVM/NVI, Bilthoven, The Netherlands), and the subsequent transfer of its production process to manufacturers in developing countries. In 1998, at the outset of the project, the majority of the world's children were not immunized against Hib because of the high price and limited supply of the conjugate vaccines, due partly to the fact that local manufacturers in developing countries did not master the Hib conjugate production technology. To address this problem, the RIVM/NVI has developed a robust Hib conjugate vaccine production process based on a proven model, and transferred this technology to several partners in India, Indonesia, Korea and China. As a result, emerging manufacturers in developing countries acquired modern technologies previously unavailable to them. This has in turn facilitated their approach to producing other conjugate vaccines. As an additional spin-off from the project, a World Health Organization (WHO) Hib quality control (QC) course was designed and conducted at the RIVM/NVI, resulting in an increased regulatory capacity for conjugate vaccines in developing countries at the National Regulatory Authority (NRA) level. For the local populations, this has translated into an increased and sustainable supply of affordable Hib conjugate-containing combination vaccines. During the course of this project, developing countries have demonstrated their ability to produce large quantities of high-quality modern vaccines after a successful transfer of the technology.     

Four year immunogenicity of the RTS,S/AS02(A) malaria vaccine in Mozambican children during a phase IIb trial

Previous studies with the malaria vaccine RTS,S/AS02_A in young children in a malaria endemic area of Mozambique have shown it to have a promising safety profile and to reduce the risk of Plasmodium falciparum infection and disease.In this study, we assessed the antibody responses to the P. falciparum and hepatitis B components of the RTS,S/AS02_A vaccine over a 45 months surveillance period in a large phase IIb trial which included 2022 children aged 1-4 years at recruitment.The RTS,S/AS02_A vaccine induced high anti-circumsporozoite antibody levels with at least 96% of children remaining seropositive during the entire follow-up period. IgG titers decayed over the first 6 months of follow-up to about 25% of the initial level, but still remained 30-fold higher until month 45 compared to controls. Children with higher levels of naturally acquired immunity at baseline, assessed by blood stage indirect fluorescent antibody test, had slightly higher anti-circumsporozoite levels, after adjusting for the effect of age.The RTS,S/AS02_A vaccine also induced high levels of anti-hepatitis B surface antigen antibodies (seroprotection >97%).RTS,S/AS02_A vaccine is immunogenic and induces long-lasting anti-circumsporozoite antibodies, persisting at least 42 months after immunization. These antibodies may play a role in protection against malaria.     

A trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in populations of adults ≥65 years of age with different prior pneumococcal vaccination

IntroductionA 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, PCV20, was developed to expand protection against vaccine-preventable pneumococcal disease. PCV20 contains the components of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, PCV13, and includes capsular polysaccharide conjugates for 7 additional serotypes. Thus, PCV20 may cover those additional serotypes in individuals previously vaccinated with PCV13 or provide benefits of immunization with a conjugate vaccine to individuals previously immunized with a pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. This study described the safety and immunogenicity of PCV20 in adults ≥65 years of age with prior pneumococcal vaccination.MethodsThis phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label study was conducted in the United States and Sweden. Adults ≥65 years of age were enrolled into 1 of 3 cohorts based on their prior pneumococcal vaccination history (23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PPSV23], PCV13, or both PCV13 and PPSV23). Participants were randomized 2:1 within their cohort to receive a single dose of PCV20 or PCV13 in those with prior PPSV23 only, and PCV20 or PPSV23 in those with prior PCV13 only; all participants with prior PCV13 and PPSV23 received PCV20. Safety was assessed by prompted local reactions within 10 days, systemic events within 7 days, adverse events (AEs) within 1 month, and serious AEs (SAEs) and newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions (NDCMCs) within 6 months after vaccination. Immune responses 1 month after PCV20 were assessed.ResultsThe percentages of participants reporting local reactions, systemic events, and AEs after PCV20 administration were similar across cohorts and comparable with the PCV13 and PPSV23 control groups. SAE and NDCMC rates were low in all groups. Robust immune responses, including opsonophagocytic antibody responses, to the 20 vaccine serotypes were observed 1 month after PCV20 regardless of prior pneumococcal vaccination.ConclusionsPCV20 was well tolerated and immunogenic in adults ≥65 years of age previously vaccinated with different pneumococcal vaccine regimens.Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03835975.     

A phase II,single-center,randomized, double-blind,parallel control clinical study evaluating the immunogenicity and safety of a two-dose schedule of serogroups ACYW meningococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine

BackgroundThis was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel control study evaluating the immunogenicity and safety of a two-dose schedule of serogroups ACYW meningococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine with tetanus toxoid (TT) conjugate protein, in infants and toddlers of 3–35 months old.Method720 participants were stratified according to the age of 3–5 months old, 6–11 months old, and 12–35 months old and randomly assigned with an equal ratio to two different dose groups, i.e., 40- and 20-μg doses. Blood samples were taken from all participants before the first vaccination and 30 days after the full-course vaccination to detect the serogroups ACYW meningococcal antibodies. All adverse events occurred within 30 days after vaccination of each dose, and serious adverse events occurred within six months after full-course vaccination were collected for safety evaluation. This study was registered at the China drug trial registration with the identifier CTR 20182031.ResultsAfter 30 days of full-course vaccination, 92.78 % (95 % CI: 85.70 %-100.00 %) showed the immune response against all serogroups in both high-dose and low-dose groups by rabbit serum bactericidal antibody assay (rSBA) and the geometric mean titer (GMT) of all serogroups showed a high level (74.6–505.8, 95 % CI: 56.4–615.7). However, no significant difference between different dose groups was observed (P > 0.05). The common local and systemic adverse events in both groups were redness (3 %-7%), and fever (26 %-65 %), respectively. In addition, the grade 3 adverse event related to the vaccine was fever (1.67 %-12.50 %). No serious adverse event was reported to be associate with the vaccination.ConclusionThe serogroups ACYW meningococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine was safe and effective in the population aged 3–35 months. The vaccine efficacy and safety of the 20-μg dose group were not less than that of the 40-μg dose group.     

Phase I,randomized, observer-blind,placebo-controlled studies to evaluate the safety,reactogenicity and immunogenicity of an investigational non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) protein vaccine in adults

BackgroundNon-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is a major cause of various respiratory diseases. The development of an effective vaccine against NTHi mandates new approaches beyond conjugated vaccines as this opportunistic bacterium is non-encapsulated. Here we report on the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a multi-component investigational vaccine based on three conserved surface proteins from NTHi (proteins D [PD], E [PE] and Pilin A [PilA]) in two observer-blind phase I studies.MethodsIn the first study (NCT01657526), 48 healthy 18–40 year-olds received two vaccine formulations (10 or 30 μg of each antigen [PD and a fusion protein PE-PilA]) or saline placebo at months 0 and 2. In the second study (NCT01678677), 270 50–70 year-olds, current or former smokers, received eight vaccine formulations (10 or 30 μg antigen/dose non-adjuvanted or adjuvanted with alum, AS01_E or AS04_C) or saline placebo at months 0, 2 and 6 (plain and alum-adjuvanted groups) and at months 0 and 2 (AS-adjuvanted groups). Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 7 and 30 days post-vaccination, respectively; potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) and serious AEs (SAEs) throughout the studies. Humoral and antigen-specific T-cell immunity (in study 2 only) responses were assessed up to 12 months post-vaccination.ResultsObserved reactogenicity was highest in the AS-adjuvanted groups but no safety concerns were identified with any of the NTHi vaccine formulations. One fatal SAE (cardiac arrest) not considered related to vaccination, and one pIMD (non-serious psoriasis) in the Placebo group, were reported post-dose 3 in Study 2. All formulations generated a robust antibody response while the AS01-adjuvanted formulations produced the highest humoral and cellular immune responses.ConclusionThis study confirms that the NTHi vaccine formulations had an acceptable reactogenicity and safety profile and were immunogenic in adults. These results justify further clinical development of this NTHi vaccine candidate.     

Comparative immunogenicity and safety of different multivalent component pertussis vaccine formulations and a 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine in infants and toddlers: a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter study

Background

Pentavalent and quadrivalent combination vaccine formulations from the same manufacturer (DTaP-IPV/Hib [PENTA], DTaP-IPV [QUAD]) were investigated as to whether they were sufficiently interchangeable to tailor use to local preference or availability.

Methods

A randomized, controlled, open-label, 4-armed, multicenter study in healthy, full-term infants (42–89 days of age) was conducted in 38 centers across the United States. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to a control vaccine group (3 doses DTaP, IPV, and Hib and at Dose 4 DTaP and Hib) and 3 combination vaccine groups: (1) 3 doses PENTA, then Dose 4 DTaP and Hib; (2) 4 QUAD doses and Hib; (3) 4 PENTA doses. Participants (N = 2167) were immunized at 2, 4, and 6 months of age, Dose 4 participants (N = 1832) at 15 months of age. Immunogenicity was assessed before Doses 1 and 4 and after Doses 3 and 4. Safety was assessed 30 days after each dose and through 180 days Post-Dose 4.

Results

Antibody responses and geometric mean concentrations/geometric mean titers (GMCs/GMTs) elicited by each combination vaccine were noninferior (upper-bound 90% confidence interval of GMC/GMT ratios <1.5) to control vaccines except pertactin GMCs were higher after 4 control DTaP doses (157.46 EU/mL) than after Dose 4 with DTaP and Hib (after a PENTA infant series) (111.70 EU/mL) and after 4 PENTA doses (98.00 EU/mL). Fever rates in the combination vaccine groups were noninferior (upper bound 95% CI of combination vaccine group fever rate minus control vaccine group fever rate <10%) to the control vaccine group except the rate after 4 QUAD and Hib doses (23.5%) was higher than after 4 control DTaP doses (13.9%).

Conclusions

PENTA and QUAD had similar safety profiles and no clinically important differences in immunogenicity compared with separately administered control vaccines. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT ID: NCT00255047).     

A randomized phase II trial to compare safety and immunogenicity of the MVA-BN smallpox vaccine at various doses in adults with a history of AIDS

Traditional replicating smallpox vaccines are associated with serious safety concerns in the general population and are contraindicated in immunocompromised individuals. However, this very population remains at greatest risk for severe complications following viral infections, making vaccine prevention particularly relevant. MVA-BN was developed as a non-replicating smallpox vaccine that is potentially safer for people who are immunocompromised. In this phase II trial, 3 MVA-BN dosing regimens were evaluated for safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity in persons with HIV (PWH) who had a history of AIDS. Following randomization, 87 participants who were predominately male and African American received either 2 standard doses on weeks 0 and 4 in the standard dose (SD) group (N = 27), 2 double-standard doses on the same schedule in the double dose (DD) group (N = 29), or 3 standard doses on weeks 0, 4 and 12 in the booster dose (BD) group (N = 31). No safety concerns were identified, and injection site pain was the most commonly reported solicited adverse event (AE) in all groups (66.7%), with no meaningful differences between groups. The incidence of severe (Grade 3) AEs was low across groups and no serious AEs or AEs of special interest considered related to study vaccine were reported. Doubling the standard MVA-BN dose had no significant effect on induction of neutralizing antibodies, with 100% seroconversion and comparable GMTs at week 6 in the SD and DD groups (78.9 and 100.3, respectively). A booster dose significantly increased peak neutralizing titers in the BD group (GMT: 281.1), which remained elevated at 12 months (GMT: 45.3) compared to the SD (GMT: 6.2) and DD (GMT: 10.6) groups. However, based on the immune response previously reported for healthy participants, a third dose (booster) does not appear necessary, even for immunocompromised participants.Clinical Trial Registry Number: NCT02038881.     

A randomized,double-blind,dose-finding Phase II study to evaluate immunogenicity and safety of the third generation smallpox vaccine candidate IMVAMUNE

IMVAMUNE^® is a Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA)-based virus that is being developed as a safer 3rd generation smallpox vaccine. In order to determine the optimal dose for further development, a double-blind, randomized Phase II trial was performed testing three different doses of IMVAMUNE^® in 164 healthy volunteers. All three IMVAMUNE^® doses displayed a favourable safety profile, with local reactions as the most frequent observation. The 1 × 10⁸ TCID₅₀ IMVAMUNE^® dose induced a total antibody response in 94% of the subjects following the first vaccination and the highest peak seroconversion rates by ELISA (100%) and PRNT (71%). This IMVAMUNE^® dose was considered to be optimal for the further clinical development of this highly attenuated poxvirus as a safer smallpox vaccine.